Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, VA; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 55615-55616 [2010-22722]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–71,601]
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporate Trust Operations Division
Also Known as Global Corporate Trust
Billing Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Aerotek, Inc., Also
Known as Allegis Group and
Teksystems, Aetea Information
Technology, Inc., Ajilon Consulting,
American, Cybersystems, Inc., and
Comforce Staffing Services, Syracuse,
NY; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on March 25, 2010,
applicable to workers of The Bank of
New York Mellon, Corporate Trust
Operations Division, also known as
Global Corporate Trust Billing,
including on-site leased workers from
Aerotek, Inc., AETEA Information
Technology, Inc., Ajilon Consulting,
American Cybersystems, Inc., and
Comforce Staffing Services, Syracuse,
New York. The notice was published in
the Federal Register on April 23, 2010
(75 FR 21356).
At the request of the State Agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in customized trust
services, such as debt finance
transactions.
The company reports that Aerotek,
Inc., an on-site leasing firm at the
subject firm, is also known as Allegis
Group and TEKsystems.
Information also shows that workers
separated from employment from
Aerotek, Inc. had their wages reported
under a separate unemployment
insurance (UI) tax account for Allegis
Group and TEKsystems.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending this certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
the subject firm who were adversely
affected by a shift in customized trust
services to Pune, India.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–71,601 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of The Bank of New York
Mellon, Corporate Trust Operations Division,
including on-site leased workers of Aerotek,
Inc., also known as Allegis Group and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
TEKsystems, AETEA Information
Technology, Inc., Ajilon Consulting,
American Cybersystems, Inc., and Comforce
Staffing Services, Syracuse, New York, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after July 7, 2008, through
March 25, 2012, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 1st day of
September 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–22718 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
55615
after July 21, 2007, through July 21, 2009, are
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 30th day of
August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–22717 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,695]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, VA; Notice
of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,856]
Isco Tubulars, Inc., Camanche, IA;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on December 23, 2009,
applicable to workers of IPSCO
Tubulars, Inc., Camanche, Iowa (subject
firm). The Department’s notice was
published in the Federal Register on
February 16, 2010 (74 FR 7034).
Workers are engaged in employment
related to the production of steel pipe
and tubular products.
On our own motion, the Department
reviewed the certification applicable to
the workers of the subject firm.
The Department’s review shows that
the subject firm was publicly identified
by name by the International Trade
Commission in an investigation
resulting in a category of determination
that is listed in Section 222(f) of the Act,
19 U.S.C. 2272(f). That determination
was published in the Federal Register
on July 21, 2008 and is within one year
of the date of the TAA petition.
Therefore, the Department is amending
the impact date to read July 21, 2007
and the expiration date to read July 21,
2009.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–70,856 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of IPSCO Tubulars, Inc.,
Camanche, Iowa, who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On May 4, 2010, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of Parkdale Mills
(formerly Hanesbrands, Inc.), Galax,
Virginia. The Department’s Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
May 20, 2010 (75 FR 28295).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
finding that Parkdale Mills (formerly
Hanesbrands, Inc.), Galax, Virginia did
not totally or partially separate, or
threaten to separate, a significant
number or proportion of workers as
required by Section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners alleged that an adequate
employment decline had occurred and
provided additional information in
support of the allegation.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department of Labor
requested Hanesbrands, Inc. to submit a
new Confidential Data Request form as
well as written and verbal clarification
of previously-submitted information
and additional written information.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department confirmed
that the facility at issue was sold by
Hanesbrands, Inc. to Parkdale Mills of
Gastonia, North Carolina on October 28,
2009 and that yarn production increased
in 2008 from 2007 levels but decreased
during January through September 2009
compared to January through September
2008 levels.
The petitioners state that separations
at the Galax, Virginia facility occurred
on October 23, 2009 and October 24,
2009, and asserts that worker
separations occurred because the ‘‘Plant
was sold—reduction in force.’’
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
55616
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Notices
Based on previously-submitted
information and new information
obtained during the reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that the subject workers are
workers separated from Hanesbrands,
Inc., Galax, Virginia and not workers
separated from Parkdale Mills, Galax,
Virginia. A careful review of the new
information revealed that a significant
proportion or number of workers at
Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia was
totally or partially separated, or
threatened with such separation, prior
to October 28, 2009.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department confirmed
that Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia
was an export-only facility that
produced yarn exclusively for use in
foreign countries and that Hanesbrands,
Inc. did not shift to or acquire from a
foreign country articles like or directly
competitive with the yarn produced at
the Galax, Virginia facility.
The reconsideration investigation also
revealed that Hanesbrands, Inc. did not
increase its imports of either articles
like or directly competitive with the
yarn produced at the Galax, Virginia
facility or the apparel made from fabric
woven from the yarn formerly produced
at the Galax, Virginia facility.
Based on the information obtained
during the initial and reconsideration
investigations, the Department
determines that the criteria set forth in
Section 222(a) have not been met.
Since the yarn produced by the
subject worker group was exported to be
used in foreign facilities and worker
groups located outside the United States
and U.S. Territories cannot be eligible to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance,
the Department determines that the
adversely affected secondary workers
criteria set forth in Section 222(c) have
not been met.
Conclusion
mstockstill on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
After careful reconsideration, I affirm
the original notice of negative
determination of eligibility to apply for
worker adjustment assistance for
workers and former workers of
Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of
August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–22722 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Sep 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: (10–110)]
NASA Advisory Council; Information
Technology Infrastructure Committee;
Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public
Law 92–463, as amended, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) announce a meeting for the
Information Technology Infrastructure
Committee of the NASA Advisory
Council (NAC).
DATES: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 8
a.m.–5:30 p.m., Local Time. Meet-MeNumber: 1–877–613–3958; #2939943
ADDRESSES: NASA Ames Conference
Center, 500 Severyns Avenue, Building
3, Ballroom, NASA Research Park,
Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Tereda J. Frazier, Executive Secretary
for the Information Technology
Infrastructure Committee, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546,
(202) 358–2595.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The topics
of discussion for the meeting are the
following:
• NASA IT Summit Post Mortem
Briefing;
• NASA’s Chief Technology Officer
Briefing;
• Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Chief
Technology Officer Briefing;
• IT Committee Work Plan Actions/
Assignments;
• Logistics.
The meeting will be open to the
public up to the seating capacity of the
room. It is imperative that this meeting
be held on this date to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Visitors will need to show
a valid picture identification such as a
driver’s license to enter the NASA Ames
Conference Center and must state that
they are attending the NASA Advisory
Council Information Technology
Infrastructure Committee meeting in the
Ballroom. All non-U.S. citizens must fax
copy of their passport, and print or type
their name, current address, citizenship,
company affiliation (if applicable) to
include address, telephone number, and
their title, place of birth, date of birth,
U.S. visa information to include type,
number and expiration date, U.S. Social
Security Number (if applicable), and
place and date of entry into the U.S., to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ms. Tereda J. Frazier, Executive
Secretary, Information Technology
Infrastructure Committee, NASA
Advisory Council, at e-mail
tereda.j.frazier@nasa.gov or by
telephone at (202) 358–2595 by no later
than September 20, 2010. To expedite
admittance, attendees with U.S.
citizenship can provide identifying
information 3 working days in advance
by contacting Ms. Tereda J. Frazier via
e-mail at tereda.j.frazier@nasa.gov or by
telephone at 202–358–2595. Persons
with disabilities who require assistance
should indicate this.
Dated: September 7, 2010.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–22651 Filed 9–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency
Meeting
10 a.m., Thursday,
September 16, 2010.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Briefing on Dodd-Frank Act
Implementation.
2. Final Rule—Part 701 of NCUA’s
Rules and Regulations, Secondary
Capital Accounts.
3. Final Rule—Part 701 of NCUA’s
Rules and Regulations, Short-term,
Small amount Loans.
4. Vantage Credit Union’s Appeal of
Region IV’s Denial of its Request to
Convert to a Federal Community
Charter.
5. Insurance Fund Report.
6. Adoption of FASAB Standards for
Financial Reporting on the National
Credit Union Share Insurance Fund.
7. National Credit Union Share
Insurance Fund Premium.
RECESS: 11:15 a.m.
TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday,
September 16, 2010.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Delegations of Authority (3). Closed
pursuant to some or all of the following
exemptions: (2), (8), (9)(A)(ii) and (B).
TIME AND DATE:
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55615-55616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22722]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,695]
Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, VA; Notice of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On May 4, 2010, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former
workers of Parkdale Mills (formerly Hanesbrands, Inc.), Galax,
Virginia. The Department's Notice was published in the Federal Register
on May 20, 2010 (75 FR 28295).
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the finding that Parkdale Mills (formerly Hanesbrands, Inc.),
Galax, Virginia did not totally or partially separate, or threaten to
separate, a significant number or proportion of workers as required by
Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioners alleged that an
adequate employment decline had occurred and provided additional
information in support of the allegation.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department of Labor
requested Hanesbrands, Inc. to submit a new Confidential Data Request
form as well as written and verbal clarification of previously-
submitted information and additional written information.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department confirmed
that the facility at issue was sold by Hanesbrands, Inc. to Parkdale
Mills of Gastonia, North Carolina on October 28, 2009 and that yarn
production increased in 2008 from 2007 levels but decreased during
January through September 2009 compared to January through September
2008 levels.
The petitioners state that separations at the Galax, Virginia
facility occurred on October 23, 2009 and October 24, 2009, and asserts
that worker separations occurred because the ``Plant was sold--
reduction in force.''
[[Page 55616]]
Based on previously-submitted information and new information
obtained during the reconsideration investigation, the Department
determines that the subject workers are workers separated from
Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia and not workers separated from
Parkdale Mills, Galax, Virginia. A careful review of the new
information revealed that a significant proportion or number of workers
at Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia was totally or partially
separated, or threatened with such separation, prior to October 28,
2009.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department confirmed
that Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax, Virginia was an export-only facility
that produced yarn exclusively for use in foreign countries and that
Hanesbrands, Inc. did not shift to or acquire from a foreign country
articles like or directly competitive with the yarn produced at the
Galax, Virginia facility.
The reconsideration investigation also revealed that Hanesbrands,
Inc. did not increase its imports of either articles like or directly
competitive with the yarn produced at the Galax, Virginia facility or
the apparel made from fabric woven from the yarn formerly produced at
the Galax, Virginia facility.
Based on the information obtained during the initial and
reconsideration investigations, the Department determines that the
criteria set forth in Section 222(a) have not been met.
Since the yarn produced by the subject worker group was exported to
be used in foreign facilities and worker groups located outside the
United States and U.S. Territories cannot be eligible to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance, the Department determines that the
adversely affected secondary workers criteria set forth in Section
222(c) have not been met.
Conclusion
After careful reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of
negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance for workers and former workers of Hanesbrands, Inc., Galax,
Virginia.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-22722 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
