Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fees Schedule, 54408-54410 [2010-22207]
Download as PDF
54408
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices
securities in which it is registered as a
DMM. The Exchange does not need to
spell out the term ‘‘designated market
maker’’ as it, and the term DMM unit,
are defined terms in Rule 2.
The Exchange proposes to implement
these changes on October 1, 2010.4
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ‘‘Act’’),5 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,6
in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
the proposed Rule is consistent with
these principles in that it seeks to
increase the trading performance of
SLPs, which will benefit all market
participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 7 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.8 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
4 As noted above, the SLP program is a pilot
program currently set to expire on September 30,
2010. The Exchange intends to file to make the
program permanent or extend the pilot program so
that it can continue past September 30, 2010.
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Sep 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.10
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSEAmex–2010–85 on
the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAmex–2010–85. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent
to file the proposed rule change along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied the pre-filing requirement.
10 17
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEAmex–2010–85 and should be
submitted on or before September 28,
2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–22206 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–62793; File No. SR–CBOE–
2010–076]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Fees
Schedule
August 30, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
17, 2010, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Fees Schedule relating to routing
charges. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.cboe.org/legal), at
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to modify
its fee schedule related to routing large
orders to other exchanges for execution
in connection with the Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan referenced in CBOE Rule 6.80.
Currently, when the Exchange receives
a marketable order for the account of a
non-broker dealer when CBOE is not at
the national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’),
CBOE transmits a message to market
participants in accordance with Rule
6.14A to see in an attempt to achieve an
execution at the NBBO price or better
for the order (i.e., step-up) so that CBOE
can avoid routing order flow to a
competing exchange. If step-up is not
achieved, CBOE will route a ‘‘linkage’’
order to the NBBO market(s) up to the
size of the displayed interest at the
NBBO or the size of the order
(whichever is smaller).3 If the linkage
order is executed (which is typically the
case), CBOE absorbs all transaction costs
associated with the execution at the
away market. CBOE also routes the
order for free. When CBOE receives a
similar marketable order for the account
of a broker dealer, however, CBOE
charges $0.50 per contract for the
routing and away execution costs, in
addition to the customary CBOE
execution charges. This is because the
service is geared more toward retail
customer orders.
CBOE is now seeking to refine the
cost structure of the program as it relates
3 We note that, pursuant to Rule 6.14A(a)(i), if one
or more orders are resting at the Exchange’s BBO
and there is insufficient Market-Maker interest at
the BBO price to satisfy the entire marketable order,
the Exchange will immediately route away without
processing for step-up.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Sep 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
to large non-broker dealer customer
orders. Specifically, when CBOE
receives a qualifying customer order
that has an original size of 1,000 or more
contracts that is routed, in whole or in
part, to one or more exchanges, CBOE
will charge $ 0.35 per contract executed
on another exchange, in addition to the
customary CBOE execution charges
(when applicable). The changes will
take effect on August 23, 2010.
These larger non-broker dealer
customer orders are more akin to broker
dealer orders and CBOE believes it is
appropriate and consistent to pass
through some of these costs. We note
that the step-up service should still be
a very attractive offering for these larger
non-broker dealer orders since, when
step-up is achieved, they will continue
to receive considerable cost savings. As
is the case today, order senders can
request that orders be cancelled if stepup is not achieved without routing to an
away market, thereby avoiding this new
charge. The program will remain
unchanged for orders that fall under the
1,000 contract threshold.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),4 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 5 of the Act
in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among CBOE trading permit holders.
Because non-broker dealer customer
orders with an original size of 1,000
contracts or more are more akin to
broker dealer orders, CBOE believes it is
appropriate to pass through some costs
associated with this routing service.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
4 15
5 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is
designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge, thereby qualifying for
effectiveness on filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) 6 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 7
thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2010–076 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2010–076. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
6 15
7 17
Sfmt 4703
54409
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
C.F.R. 240.19b–4(f)(2).
07SEN1
54410
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 7, 2010 / Notices
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
will also be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–CBOE–
2010–076 and should be submitted on
or before September 28, 2010.
distributions paid by the issuer of the
underlying security.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The primary purpose of this proposed
rule change is to revise OCC’s By-Laws
to allow OCC to make adjustments to
the settlement price of exchangedesignated security futures for all cash
dividends or distributions paid by the
issuer of the underlying security. Under
its current rules, OCC makes such
adjustments only for ‘‘non-ordinary’’
dividends. However, OneChicago, LLC
(‘‘OneChicago’’) has informed OCC that
it believes there is a demand for security
futures that would be adjusted in
response to all cash dividends or
distributions. Accordingly, OCC is
proposing to amend Section 3 of Article
XII of its By-Laws to permit exchanges
to designate certain security futures that
would be adjusted for ordinary as well
as ‘‘non-ordinary’’ dividends. Exchanges
could continue to trade security futures
that would be adjusted only in the event
of a ‘‘non-ordinary’’ dividend.
For security futures subject to
adjustment for all cash dividends or
distributions, it would be the exchange’s
responsibility to inform OCC of the
issuance of a cash dividend or
distribution and the appropriate
adjustment amount. Provided that such
information (including any corrections
thereto) is reported to OCC before a
designated cut-off time prior to the exdate, OCC would then make the
appropriate adjustment to the settlement
price of the security futures contract.
Such adjustments would be effective
before the opening of business on the
ex-date.3 If the exchange failed to report
[FR Doc. 2010–22207 Filed 9–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–62801; File No. SR–OCC–
2010–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
To Allow for Adjustments to the
Settlement Price of ExchangeDesignated Security Futures for All
Cash Dividends or Distributions Paid
by the Issuer of the Underlying
Security
August 31, 2010.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
August 19, 2010, The Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) and on August 25, 2010,
amended the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which
items have been prepared primarily by
OCC. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to revise OCC’s By-Laws to
allow OCC to make adjustments to the
settlement price of exchange-designated
security futures for all cash dividends or
8 17
1 15
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:24 Sep 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
2 The Commission has modified the text of the
summaries prepared by OCC.
3 The standard method for adjusting futures
contracts in response to cash distributions is to
decrease the prior day’s settlement price by the
amount of the dividend. This adjustment is
effective at the opening of business on the ex-
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dividend or distribution information to
OCC on a timely basis or reported
incorrect dividend or distribution
information to OCC, then the exchange
would be able to report such
information or corrected information to
OCC on the ex-date, and OCC would
effect the adjustment as soon as
practicable thereafter.4 In the event the
exchange already opened trading in the
security futures contracts affected
thereby, the exchange would provide
OCC with direction on whether such
trades should be cleared or disregarded
as provided for in Article VI, Section 7
of OCC’s By-Laws. Pursuant thereto,
disregarded transactions would be
deemed null and void and given no
effect. These procedures are intended to
preserve OCC’s ability to initiate and
conduct nightly processing on a timely
basis, but they also provide the
exchange with the opportunity to report
to OCC dividend or distribution
information that was not available to it
before OCC’s processing cut-offs or to
correct erroneously reported
information to ensure an appropriate
adjustment to the settlement price for
the affected contracts.
In connection with OneChicago’s
proposal, OneChicago and OCC also
have agreed to amend the Security
Futures Agreement for Clearing and
Settlement Services, dated April 1, 2002
(the ‘‘Clearing Agreement’’), by entering
into Amendment No. 1 thereto.5
Amendment No. 1 would amend
Section 5 of the Clearing Agreement to
permit OneChicago to designate those
security futures contracts for which
adjustments will be made in response to
all cash dividends or distributions and
to set forth for OneChicago’s obligation
to furnish OCC with notice of all
relevant information regarding such
dividends or distributions in order for
distribution date and parallels the adjustment made
to the price of the underlying stock by the securities
exchanges on the ex-distribution date. It is intended
to ensure that no futures mark-to-the-market
attributable to the adjustment made to the stock
price for the dividend will occur.
4 OCC also proposes to add Interpretation and
Policy .10 to Article XII, Section 3 that provides
that officially reported settlement prices will not be
adjusted (other than as provided for in the By-Laws
and Rules) except in extraordinary circumstances.
The Interpretation further provides that in no event
will a completed settlement be adjusted due to
errors discovered thereafter. This latter provision is
intended to preserve the finality of money
settlements should it be later determined that an
officially reported settlement price was erroneous
and is based on existing provisions of OCC’s ByLaws. See, e.g., Article XIV, Section 6,
Interpretation and Policy .01; Article XVI, Section
4, Interpretation and Policy .01; and Article XVII,
Section 4, Interpretation and Policy .01.
5 Amendment No. 1, which will be executed after
the effectiveness of this filing, would amend and
restate Section 5 of the Clearing Agreement.
E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM
07SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54408-54410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-22207]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-62793; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-076]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Fees Schedule
August 30, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 17, 2010, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule relating to
routing charges. The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (https://www.cboe.org/legal), at
[[Page 54409]]
the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to modify its fee schedule related to
routing large orders to other exchanges for execution in connection
with the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan
referenced in CBOE Rule 6.80. Currently, when the Exchange receives a
marketable order for the account of a non-broker dealer when CBOE is
not at the national best bid or offer (``NBBO''), CBOE transmits a
message to market participants in accordance with Rule 6.14A to see in
an attempt to achieve an execution at the NBBO price or better for the
order (i.e., step-up) so that CBOE can avoid routing order flow to a
competing exchange. If step-up is not achieved, CBOE will route a
``linkage'' order to the NBBO market(s) up to the size of the displayed
interest at the NBBO or the size of the order (whichever is
smaller).\3\ If the linkage order is executed (which is typically the
case), CBOE absorbs all transaction costs associated with the execution
at the away market. CBOE also routes the order for free. When CBOE
receives a similar marketable order for the account of a broker dealer,
however, CBOE charges $0.50 per contract for the routing and away
execution costs, in addition to the customary CBOE execution charges.
This is because the service is geared more toward retail customer
orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ We note that, pursuant to Rule 6.14A(a)(i), if one or more
orders are resting at the Exchange's BBO and there is insufficient
Market-Maker interest at the BBO price to satisfy the entire
marketable order, the Exchange will immediately route away without
processing for step-up.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBOE is now seeking to refine the cost structure of the program as
it relates to large non-broker dealer customer orders. Specifically,
when CBOE receives a qualifying customer order that has an original
size of 1,000 or more contracts that is routed, in whole or in part, to
one or more exchanges, CBOE will charge $ 0.35 per contract executed on
another exchange, in addition to the customary CBOE execution charges
(when applicable). The changes will take effect on August 23, 2010.
These larger non-broker dealer customer orders are more akin to
broker dealer orders and CBOE believes it is appropriate and consistent
to pass through some of these costs. We note that the step-up service
should still be a very attractive offering for these larger non-broker
dealer orders since, when step-up is achieved, they will continue to
receive considerable cost savings. As is the case today, order senders
can request that orders be cancelled if step-up is not achieved without
routing to an away market, thereby avoiding this new charge. The
program will remain unchanged for orders that fall under the 1,000
contract threshold.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\4\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \5\ of the Act in
particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among CBOE
trading permit holders. Because non-broker dealer customer orders with
an original size of 1,000 contracts or more are more akin to broker
dealer orders, CBOE believes it is appropriate to pass through some
costs associated with this routing service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed rule change is designated by the Exchange as
establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, thereby
qualifying for effectiveness on filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \6\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
\7\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\7\ 17 C.F.R. 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-076 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-076. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
[[Page 54410]]
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File No. SR-CBOE-2010-076 and should be submitted on or before
September 28, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22207 Filed 9-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P