Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 52982-52987 [2010-21394]

Download as PDF 52982 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 18, 2010, applicable to workers of BlueScope Buildings North America, Laurinburg, North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2010 (75 FR 32224). At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to prefabricated metal building components. New information shows that some workers separated from employment at BlueScope Buildings North America had their wages reported through a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name Butler Manufacturing Company, a division of BlueScope Buildings North America. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the production of prefabricated metal building components to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–73,758 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of BlueScope Buildings North America, including workers whose unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported through Butler Manufacturing Company, Laurinburg, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 19, 2009, through May 18, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–21399 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–70,784] [FR Doc. 2010–21397 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Chrysler Group LLC, Formally Known as Chrysler LLC, Kenosha Engine Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC and Syncreon, Kenosha, WI; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on September 2, 2009, applicable to workers of Chrysler Group LLC, formally known as Chrysler, LLC, Kenosha Engine Plant, Kenosha, Wisconsin. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57340). The notice was amended on May 10, 2010 to include on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC. The notice was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 34170– 34171). At the request of the state, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities in production of V–6 automobile engines. The company reports that workers leased from Syncreon were employed on-site at the Kenosha, Wisconsin location of Chrysler Group LLC, formally known as Chrysler, LLC, Kenosha Engine Plant. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Sycreon working on-site at the Kenosha Engine Plant. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–70,784 is hereby issued as follows: All workers at Chrysler Group LLC, formally known as Chrysler, LLC, Kenosha Engine Plant, including on-site leased workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC and Syncreon, Kenosha, Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 27, 2008, through September 2, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— 52983 (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1- year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 72,956 ............. 73,302 ............. 73,587 ............. Jasper Chair Company ........................................... Wolfe Dye & Bleach Works, Inc ............................. ArcelorMittal Weirton, Inc., Leased Workers from The Hudson Company. Connextions, Inc., Sprint Operating Unit ................ Sing Fei, Inc ............................................................ Jasper, IN ................................................................ Shoemakersville, PA ............................................... Weirton, WV ............................................................ November 19, 2008. January 7, 2009. February 26, 2009. Concord, NC ........................................................... San Francisco, CA .................................................. April 20, 2009. July 24, 2009. 74,001 ............. 74,460 ............. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 72,734 ............. 72,896 ............. 72,936 ............. Nukote International, Inc ......................................... Staffmark, Working On Site at Leach International Current Medicine Group, LLC, Springs Science+Business Media Finance, Inc. Rochester, NY ......................................................... Buena Park, CA ...................................................... Philadelphia, PA ...................................................... October 30, 2008. November 18, 2008. November 19, 2008. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 52984 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,450 ............. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Employee Reporting to Woodland Park, NJ. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc.. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. Farley’s and Sathers Candy Company, Inc., Onsite Leased Workers from Doherty Staffing Solutions. Aigis Mechtronics, Inc., A Subsidiary of Nortek, Inc., Leased Workers of Adecco Employment Services. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations, etc., Off-Site Workers Reporting to St. Louis, MO. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. Lodging by Liberty, Inc., Brown Jordan International, Inc.; BJI Employee Services; etc. Eli Lilly and Company, Chemical Process Research and Development Pilot Plant. Keane, Inc., Teachers Insurance Annuity Association—College Retirement Equities Fund. Multina, USA ........................................................... LTX–Credence Corporation, Leased Workers from ATR International, Inc. HNTB Corporation, HNTB Holding, LTD., Accounting Department. Stanadyne Corporation, Pencil Nozzel Injector Division, Leased Workers from Pro-Type. GM Powertrain Defiance CET, General Motors ..... Pentel of America, Ltd., Manufacturing Division ..... Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Leased Workers from Manpower and Kforce. Sweater Project Corp .............................................. White’s Metal Works, Inc ........................................ The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. Woodland Park, NJ ................................................. January 29, 2009. Winona, MN ............................................................ January 29, 2009. Greenville, TX ......................................................... January 29, 2009. Piedmont, SC .......................................................... January 29, 2009. Anaheim, CA ........................................................... January 29, 2009. Havre De Grace, MD .............................................. January 29, 2009. Smyrna, GA ............................................................. January 29, 2009. Westwego, LA ......................................................... January 29, 2009. Mount Pleasant, TN ................................................ January 29, 2009. Stamford, CT ........................................................... January 29, 2009. North Augusta, SC .................................................. January 29, 2009. Tempe, AZ .............................................................. January 29, 2009. Round Lake, MN ..................................................... February 17, 2009. Winston-Salem, NC ................................................. February 22, 2009. St. Louis, MO .......................................................... February 24, 2009. St. Charles, MO ...................................................... February 24, 2009. Hazelwood, MO ....................................................... February 24, 2009. Liberty, NC .............................................................. March 15, 2009. Indianapolis, IN ....................................................... March 22, 2009. Denver, CO ............................................................. March 26, 2009. Plattsburgh, NY ....................................................... Hillsboro, OR ........................................................... March 18, 2009. March 16, 2009. Kansas City, MO ..................................................... April 1, 2009. Jacksonville, NC ...................................................... April 13, 2009. Defiance, OH ........................................................... Torrance, CA ........................................................... Tewksbury, MA ....................................................... April 14, 2009. May 6, 2009. May 17, 2009. North Bergen, NJ .................................................... Bassett, VA ............................................................. Long Beach, CA ...................................................... May 11, 2009. June 10, 2009. June 7, 2009. Anaheim, CA ........................................................... June 7, 2009. El Segundo, CA ...................................................... June 7, 2009. 73,450A ........... 73,450B ........... 73,450C .......... 73,450D .......... 73,450E ........... 73,450F ........... 73,450G .......... 73,450H .......... 73,450I ............ 73,450J ........... 73,450K ........... 73,513 ............. 73,577 ............. 73,635 ............. 73,635A ........... 73,635B ........... 73,753 ............. 73,775 ............. 73,796 ............. 73,806 ............. 73,849 ............. 73,878 ............. 73,917 ............. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 74,012 ............. 74,058 ............. 74,112 ............. 74,140 ............. 74,223 ............. 74,293 ............. 74,293A ........... 74,293B ........... VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM Impact date 30AUN1 52985 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 74,293C .......... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. The TriZetto Group, Inc., Leased Workers from Syntel Limited, Inforonics, LLC, etc. HSBC Card Services, Inc., HSBC North American Holdings, Security and Fraud Dept., etc. Quiksilver Americas, Quiksliver Screenprint Operations, Leased Workers from Rainmaker Staffing. Travelers Indemnity Company, Claims Services, Workers’ Compensation Subrogation. Laserwords U.S., Inc., Laserwords Private LTD, Leased Workers from Kelly Services. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement. Hagemeyer North America, El Paso Branch .......... Hagemeyer North America, Mcallen Branch .......... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department, Off-Site Teleworker Bryan Martin. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Leach International, Esterline Technologies, Leased Workers from Ultimate Staffing Service, etc. Providence Chain Company, Leased Workers from Microtech Staffing Group and Occupations Unlimited. Huntington Beach, CA ............................................ June 7, 2009. Irvine, CA ................................................................ June 7, 2009. Lemoore, CA ........................................................... June 7, 2009. Seal Beach, CA ....................................................... June 7, 2009. Greenwood Village, CO .......................................... July 1, 2009. Tulsa, OK ................................................................ June 18, 2009. Huntington Beach, CA ............................................ May 8, 2010. Wyomissing, PA ...................................................... July 13, 2009. Lewiston, ME ........................................................... June 11, 2009. Hartford, CT ............................................................ July 26, 2009. El Paso, TX ............................................................. McAllen, TX ............................................................. Denver, CO ............................................................. July 19, 2009. July 19, 2009. July 19, 2009. Collinsville, VA ........................................................ Decatur, IL ............................................................... Jonesboro, AR ........................................................ Mansfield, OH ......................................................... Lynchburg, VA ......................................................... Enid, OK .................................................................. Grand Junction, CO ................................................ Buena Park, CA ...................................................... July July July July July July July July Providence, RI ......................................................... July 30, 2009. 74,293D .......... 74,293E ........... 74,293F ........... 74,348 ............. 74,354 ............. 74,381 ............. 74,391 ............. 74,394 ............. 74,433 ............. 74,441 ............. 74,442 ............. 74,443 ............. 74,443A ........... 74,443B ........... 74,443C .......... 74,443D .......... 74,443E ........... 74,443F ........... 74,443G .......... 74,457 ............. 74,461 ............. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Impact date 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 19, 22, 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 72,886 ............. 73,165 ............. Turner Techtronics, Inc ........................................... James Hamilton Construction Company, Tyrone Mine. Burbank, CA ............................................................ Silver City, NM ........................................................ November 17, 2008. December 23, 2008. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,431 ............. Milliken & Company, Apparel Division .................... Barnwell, SC ........................................................... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or TA–W No. Subject firm 72,283 ............. International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division, Massachusetts Teleworkers. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Impact date (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Location Frm 00062 Impact date Endicott, NY. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 January 19, 2009. E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 52986 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 72,283A ........... International Business Machines (IBM), Domino Server Application Development Team, etc., Massachusetts Teleworkers. Ferragon Corporation, Ferrous Metal Processing Company. 74,256 ............. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) Location Brooklyn, OH ........................................................... Subject firm 72,842 ............. 72,971 ............. 73,101 ............. Nabors Well Services, Ltd., Nabors Industries, Ltd ASC Machine Tools, Inc ......................................... Tyler Pipe Company, Soil/Plumbing Division, North Plant. Robin Industries, Inc., Cleveland Manufacturing .... Marshalltown Company ........................................... Unit Structures, LLC ................................................ Aperto Networks, Inc., Operations Department ...... FirstSolutions, Claims Processing Center .............. SuperMedia, LLC, FKA Idearc Media, LLC, Supermedia Information Services, LLC Auto Builders, Inc .................................................... Diagnostic Staffing Services, LLC .......................... Humana Insurance Company, Carenetwork, Inc .... Beloit Health Systems/Beloit Clinic, The Health Information Management Transcription Department. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc 73,110 73,374 73,413 73,717 73,723 73,863 ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. 73,950 74,021 74,281 74,321 ............. ............. ............. ............. 74,362 ............. Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance TA–W No. 72,463 ............. 72,771 ............. 73,827 ............. Draexlmaier Automotive of America, LLC .............. HMC Technologies .................................................. Architectural Glazing Technologies, On-site Leased Workers Bonney Staffing. Doyle and Roth Manufacturing Company, Inc ........ Blen-Col, Inc., DBA L&A Molding (Hudson Color Concentrates). StarTek USA, Inc., Off-Site Worker ........................ 74,451 ............. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Cleveland, OH. Marshalltown, IA. Magnolia, AR. Milpitas, CA. Two Harbors, MN. Bensalem, PA. Ladson, SC. Pittsburgh, PA. Green Bay, WI. Beloit, WI. York, PA. Simpson, PA. Leominster, MA. Denver, CO. workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve 73,589 ............. DuPont Performance Coatings, E.I. Dupont De Nemours Company OEM. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Employees. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division. Cytec Carbon Fibers, LLC, Corporate Service Division. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division. Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service Division. 74,094 ............. 74,095 ............. 74,096 ............. 74,097 ............. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Impact date Duncan, SC. New Albany, MS. Sanford, ME. Subject firm 74,093 ............. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Location TA–W No. 74,092 ............. Impact date San Angelo, TX. Spokane Valley, WA. Tyler, TX. Subject firm 74,273 ............. 74,383 ............. country) of section 222 have not been met. Location on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Endicott, NY. (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign TA–W No. Impact date no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location Frm 00063 Impact date Fenton, MO. Winona, MN. Greenville, TX. Piedmont, SC. Anaheim, CA. Havre de Grace, MD. Smyrna, GA. Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 52987 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 74,098 ............. Building Block Chemicals, Corporate Service Division. Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service Division. Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement. StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department StarTek USA, Inc .................................................... StarTek USA, Inc .................................................... 74,099 ............. 74,100 ............. 74,101 ............. 74,102 ............. 74,216 ............. 74,444 74,445 74,446 74,447 74,448 74,449 74,450 ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation Location Impact date Westwego, LA. Mount Pleasant, TN. Stamford, CT. North Augusta, SC. Tempe, AZ. Moosic, PA. Collinsville, VA. Decatur, IL. Jonesboro, AR. Mansfield, OH. Lynchburg, VA. Enid, OK. Grand Junction, CO. period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department’s previous negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,844 ............. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. .................................... Waterford, MI .......................................................... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: August 19, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–21394 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221 (a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. Impact date The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than September 9, 2010. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than September 9, 2010. Copies of these petitions may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of August 2010. Michael Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 8/9/10 AND 8/13/10 TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location 74496 ................ 74497 ................ 74498 ................ Hallmark Cards, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................................ Deluxe Digital Studios, Inc. (Workers) ................................. Detroit Terminal (State/One-Stop) ........................................ Kansas City, MO ................... Moosic, PA ............................ Detroit, MI ............................. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM Date of institution 30AUN1 08/09/10 08/09/10 08/11/10 Date of petition 08/02/10 06/28/10 07/08/10

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52982-52987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-21394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such

[[Page 52983]]

workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1- year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 52984]]

73,450.................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Woodland Park, NJ......... January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Employee
Reporting to Woodland
Park, NJ.
73,450A................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Winona, MN................ January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450B................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Greenville, TX............ January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450C................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Piedmont, SC.............. January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc..
73,450D................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Anaheim, CA............... January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450E................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Havre De Grace, MD........ January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450F................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Smyrna, GA................ January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450G................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Westwego, LA.............. January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450H................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Mount Pleasant, TN........ January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450I................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Stamford, CT.............. January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450J................. Cytec Industries, Inc., North Augusta, SC......... January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,450K................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Tempe, AZ................. January 29, 2009.
Corporate Service
Employees, Leased Workers
from Advanced Personnel,
etc.
73,513.................. Farley's and Sathers Candy Round Lake, MN............ February 17, 2009.
Company, Inc., On-site
Leased Workers from
Doherty Staffing
Solutions.
73,577.................. Aigis Mechtronics, Inc., A Winston-Salem, NC......... February 22, 2009.
Subsidiary of Nortek,
Inc., Leased Workers of
Adecco Employment
Services.
73,635.................. The Boeing Company, St. Louis, MO............. February 24, 2009.
Engineering Operations,
etc., Off-Site Workers
Reporting to St. Louis,
MO.
73,635A................. The Boeing Company, St. Charles, MO........... February 24, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
73,635B................. The Boeing Company, Hazelwood, MO............. February 24, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
73,753.................. Lodging by Liberty, Inc., Liberty, NC............... March 15, 2009.
Brown Jordan
International, Inc.; BJI
Employee Services; etc.
73,775.................. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.......... March 22, 2009.
Chemical Process Research
and Development Pilot
Plant.
73,796.................. Keane, Inc., Teachers Denver, CO................ March 26, 2009.
Insurance Annuity
Association--College
Retirement Equities Fund.
73,806.................. Multina, USA.............. Plattsburgh, NY........... March 18, 2009.
73,849.................. LTX-Credence Corporation, Hillsboro, OR............. March 16, 2009.
Leased Workers from ATR
International, Inc.
73,878.................. HNTB Corporation, HNTB Kansas City, MO........... April 1, 2009.
Holding, LTD., Accounting
Department.
73,917.................. Stanadyne Corporation, Jacksonville, NC.......... April 13, 2009.
Pencil Nozzel Injector
Division, Leased Workers
from Pro-Type.
74,012.................. GM Powertrain Defiance Defiance, OH.............. April 14, 2009.
CET, General Motors.
74,058.................. Pentel of America, Ltd., Torrance, CA.............. May 6, 2009.
Manufacturing Division.
74,112.................. Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Tewksbury, MA............. May 17, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Manpower and Kforce.
74,140.................. Sweater Project Corp...... North Bergen, NJ.......... May 11, 2009.
74,223.................. White's Metal Works, Inc.. Bassett, VA............... June 10, 2009.
74,293.................. The Boeing Company, Long Beach, CA............ June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,293A................. The Boeing Company, Anaheim, CA............... June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,293B................. The Boeing Company, El Segundo, CA............ June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.

[[Page 52985]]

74,293C................. The Boeing Company, Huntington Beach, CA...... June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,293D................. The Boeing Company, Irvine, CA................ June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,293E................. The Boeing Company, Lemoore, CA............... June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,293F................. The Boeing Company, Seal Beach, CA............ June 7, 2009.
Engineering Operations &
Technology Div. &
Information Technology
Div.
74,348.................. The TriZetto Group, Inc., Greenwood Village, CO..... July 1, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Syntel Limited,
Inforonics, LLC, etc.
74,354.................. HSBC Card Services, Inc., Tulsa, OK................. June 18, 2009.
HSBC North American
Holdings, Security and
Fraud Dept., etc.
74,381.................. Quiksilver Americas, Huntington Beach, CA...... May 8, 2010.
Quiksliver Screenprint
Operations, Leased
Workers from Rainmaker
Staffing.
74,391.................. Travelers Indemnity Wyomissing, PA............ July 13, 2009.
Company, Claims Services,
Workers' Compensation
Subrogation.
74,394.................. Laserwords U.S., Inc., Lewiston, ME.............. June 11, 2009.
Laserwords Private LTD,
Leased Workers from Kelly
Services.
74,433.................. Prudential Insurance Hartford, CT.............. July 26, 2009.
Company of America,
Prudential Retirement.
74,441.................. Hagemeyer North America, El Paso, TX............... July 19, 2009.
El Paso Branch.
74,442.................. Hagemeyer North America, McAllen, TX............... July 19, 2009.
Mcallen Branch.
74,443.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Denver, CO................ July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department, Off-Site
Teleworker Bryan Martin.
74,443A................. StarTek USA, Inc., Collinsville, VA.......... July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443B................. StarTek USA, Inc., Decatur, IL............... July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443C................. StarTek USA, Inc., Jonesboro, AR............. July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443D................. StarTek USA, Inc., Mansfield, OH............. July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443E................. StarTek USA, Inc., Lynchburg, VA............. July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443F................. StarTek USA, Inc., Enid, OK.................. July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,443G................. StarTek USA, Inc., Grand Junction, CO........ July 19, 2009.
Resource Planning
Department.
74,457.................. Leach International, Buena Park, CA............ July 22, 2009.
Esterline Technologies,
Leased Workers from
Ultimate Staffing
Service, etc.
74,461.................. Providence Chain Company, Providence, RI............ July 30, 2009.
Leased Workers from
Microtech Staffing Group
and Occupations Unlimited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

[[Page 52986]]

72,283A................. International Business Endicott, NY..............
Machines (IBM), Domino
Server Application
Development Team, etc.,
Massachusetts Teleworkers.
74,256.................. Ferragon Corporation, Brooklyn, OH.............. ..............................
Ferrous Metal Processing
Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,842.................. Nabors Well Services, San Angelo, TX............
Ltd., Nabors Industries,
Ltd.
72,971.................. ASC Machine Tools, Inc.... Spokane Valley, WA........
73,101.................. Tyler Pipe Company, Soil/ Tyler, TX.................
Plumbing Division, North
Plant.
73,110.................. Robin Industries, Inc., Cleveland, OH.............
Cleveland Manufacturing.
73,374.................. Marshalltown Company...... Marshalltown, IA..........
73,413.................. Unit Structures, LLC...... Magnolia, AR..............
73,717.................. Aperto Networks, Inc., Milpitas, CA..............
Operations Department.
73,723.................. FirstSolutions, Claims Two Harbors, MN...........
Processing Center.
73,863.................. SuperMedia, LLC, FKA Bensalem, PA..............
Idearc Media, LLC,
Supermedia Information
Services, LLC
73,950.................. Auto Builders, Inc........ Ladson, SC................
74,021.................. Diagnostic Staffing Pittsburgh, PA............
Services, LLC.
74,281.................. Humana Insurance Company, Green Bay, WI.............
Carenetwork, Inc.
74,321.................. Beloit Health Systems/ Beloit, WI................
Beloit Clinic, The Health
Information Management
Transcription Department.
74,362.................. Harley-Davidson Motor York, PA..................
Company Operations, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

[[Page 52987]]

74,098.................. Building Block Chemicals, Westwego, LA..............
Corporate Service
Division.
74,099.................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Mount Pleasant, TN........
Corporate Service
Division.
74,100.................. Cytec Industries, Inc., Stamford, CT..............
Corporate Service
Division.
74,101.................. Cytec Surface Specialties, North Augusta, SC.........
Inc., Corporate Service
Division.
74,102.................. Cytec Engineered Tempe, AZ.................
Materials, Inc.,
Corporate Service
Division.
74,216.................. Prudential Insurance Moosic, PA................
Company of America,
Prudential Retirement.
74,444.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Collinsville, VA..........
Resource Planning
Department.
74,445.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Decatur, IL...............
Resource Planning
Department.
74,446.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Jonesboro, AR.............
Resource Planning
Department.
74,447.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Mansfield, OH.............
Resource Planning
Department.
74,448.................. StarTek USA, Inc., Lynchburg, VA.............
Resource Planning
Department.
74,449.................. StarTek USA, Inc.......... Enid, OK..................
74,450.................. StarTek USA, Inc.......... Grand Junction, CO........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same
worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information
or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the
Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further
investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under
the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: August 19, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-21394 Filed 8-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.