Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 51846-51849 [2010-20790]

Download as PDF 51846 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2010 / Notices The amended notice applicable to TA–W–73,591A is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Chrysler Group, LLC, Manufacturing Division, St. Louis Plant North, including on-site leased workers from American Food, G4S Wackenhut, C R Associates, Syncreon, Robinson Solutions, and DuPont Performance Coatings, a wholly owned subsidiary of E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company, OEM, Fenton, Missouri, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 25, 2009, through June 2, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of August 2010. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–20787 Filed 8–20–10; 8:45 am] Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the production of prefabricated metal building components to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–73,758 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of BlueScope Buildings North America, including workers whose unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported through Buttler Manufacturing Company, Laurinburg, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 19, 2009, through May 18, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 11th day of August, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [FR Doc. 2010–20788 Filed 8–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P [TA–W–73,758] erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES BlueScope Buildings North America Including Workers Whose Unemployment Insurance (UI) Wages Are Reported Through Buttler Manufacturing Company, Laurinburg, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 18, 2010, applicable to workers of BlueScope Buildings North America, Laurinburg, North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2010 (75 FR 32224). At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to prefabricated metal building components. New information shows that some workers separated from employment at BlueScope Buildings North America had their wages reported through a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name Buttler Manufacturing Company, a division of BlueScope Buildings North America. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:25 Aug 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of August 2, 2010 through August 6, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 51847 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2010 / Notices directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or TA–W No. 72,580 73,207 73,566 73,892 74,179 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. Subject firm Location Criterion Catalysts & Technologies L.P. ........................................................... O’Neal Steel, Inc., Leased Workers from Advantage Staffing ......................... Precision Etchings and Findings, Inc. .............................................................. Design Ware, American Greetings, Leased Workers Advanced Employment Thakar Aluminum Corporation .......................................................................... Belmont, WV .................. Greensboro, NC ............. Warwick, RI .................... Kalamazoo, MI ............... Sandusky, OH ................ The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or Impact date October 13, 2008. December 31, 2008. February 24, 2009. April 5, 2009. May 27, 2009. services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,954 ......... 73,083 ......... RBP Chemical Technology, Inc. ....................................................................... Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC, On-Site Leased Workers from Atrium Staffing. Suite Simplicity, LLC, Formerly Deco Lav, Inc ................................................. Ceratizit USA, Inc., zCrtsyixit S.A., On-Site Leased Workers from The Callos Company and Adecco. NCI Group, Inc., DBA A&S Building Systems; Leased Workers of Daniel Group. Insulet Corporation, Leased Workers from John Galt Staffing, GCR Professional Services, etc. Flextronics America, LLC, Flextronics International USA, On-Site Leased Workers form Aerotek. Leased Workers From Teksystems, Ajilon, and Pomeroy, Working On-Site at Target Corporation, North Campus Rollout Room. Purchasingnet, Inc., Research & Development, and General & Administrative, ESW, etc. Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc., Emerson Electric Company. CareFusion 209, Incorporated, Leased Workers from Aerotek and Adecco ... AT&T Services, Inc., Information Technology .................................................. JBL Incorporated, Harman International Industries, Leased Workers Select Staffing, etc. Milwaukee, WI ................ Parsippany, NJ ............... November 24, 2008. December 11, 2008. Greensboro, NC ............. Derry, PA ........................ December 17, 2008. January 13, 2009. Rocky Mount, NC ............ January 25, 2009. Bedford, MA ................... February 8, 2009. Creedmoor, NC .............. February 23, 2009. Brooklyn Park, MN ......... March 1, 2009. Red Bank, NJ ................. March 16, 2009. McKinney, TX ................. April 7, 2009. Middleton, WI ................. Bothell, WA ..................... Northridge, CA ................ April 6, 2009. April 19, 2009. June 25, 2010. 73,124 ......... 73,309 ......... 73,368 ......... 73,483 ......... 73,556 ......... erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES 73,606 ......... 73,734 ......... 73,891 ......... 73,975 ......... 73,986 ......... 73,991 ......... VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:31 Aug 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Impact date 51848 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,992 ......... BP Solar International, Inc., Subsidiary of BP America International, Inc., Leased Workers of Aerotek, etc. Tyden Brooks Security Products Group, On-Site Leased Workers from ERG Staffing Service & Express Employment, etc. Precision Wire Components, Leased Workers From Aerotek ......................... Con-way Enterprise Services, Accounting, Fixed Assets and IT Infrastructure Divisions; etc. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc., Tennessee Operations Product Return Center (‘‘PRC’’). Fairchild Semiconductor, Leased Workers from NStar Global Services ......... Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA), Risk and Fraud Operations Divisions, Citigroup, Inc. Precision Dynamics Corporation ...................................................................... Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maine, Wellpoint, Inc., Leased Workers Iconma, Indecon, Pinnacle, etc. J.P. Morgan Chase, Troy Telephone Banking ................................................. Progress Software Corporation, Off-Site Workers Reporting to Bedford, Massachusetts from Arizona, etc. Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ Savvion, A Progress Software Company ......................................................... DataDirect Technologies .................................................................................. Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ DataDirect Technologies Headquarters ........................................................... Progress Software Corporation ........................................................................ DataDirect Technologies .................................................................................. DataDirect Technologies .................................................................................. DataDirect Technologies .................................................................................. Evonik Cyro, LLC, Evonik Industries, On-Site Leased Workers from Manpower. Frederick, MD ................. April 23, 2009. Phillipsburg, NJ .............. April 30, 2009. Tualatin, OR ................... Portland, OR ................... April 23, 2009. May 28, 2009. Lebanon, TN ................... May 28, 2009. Mountaintop, PA ............. Tucson, AZ ..................... June 3, 2009. June 1, 2009. San Fernando, CA ......... South Portland, ME ........ June 14, 2009. June 24, 2009. Troy, MI .......................... Bedford, MA ................... July 12, 2009. July 12, 2009. El Segundo, CA .............. San Francisco, CA ......... Nashua, NH .................... Santa Clara, CA ............. Los Gatos, CA ................ Oak Brook, IL ................. Largo, MD ....................... New York, NY ................. Morrisville, NC ................ Austin, TX ....................... Sugar Land, TX .............. Fairfax, VA ...................... Norfolk, VA ..................... Sanford, ME ................... July July July July July July July July July July July July July July 74,038 ......... 74,124 ......... 74,170 ......... 74,172 ......... 74,187 ......... 74,209 ......... 74,292 ......... 74,299 ......... 74,382 ......... 74,397 ......... 74,398 74,399 74,400 74,401 74,402 74,403 74,404 74,405 74,406 74,407 74,408 74,409 74,410 74,431 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Impact date 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 22, 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. 2009. are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,988 ......... Matcor Automotive, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers from GSN Staffing, Ameristaff & Express, etc. General Fasteners Company ........................................................................... General Motors Component Holdings, LLC, General Motors Company; Delphi Corporation, Electronics & Safety Division. Eagle Express Trucking, Inc. ............................................................................ River Bend Industries, LLC, Leased Workers Firststaff ................................... Moberly, MO ................... November 24, 2008. Richmond, IN .................. Kokomo, IN ..................... January 27, 2009. February 15, 2010. Saint Marys, PA ............. Fort Smith, AR ................ May 20, 2009. May 10, 2009. 73,378 ......... 73,689 ......... 74,130 ......... 74,205 ......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,871 ......... Weyerhaeuser Company, iLevel Sales Service Center ................................... Sacramento, CA ............. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) TA–W No. Subject firm 73,683 ......... 74,173 ......... Contour Aerospace Corporation, a division of Vought Aircraft Industries ....... Liberty Healthcare Corporation ......................................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:31 Aug 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Sfmt 4703 Impact date April 6, 2009. (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. Location Fmt 4703 Impact date Everett, WA. Bala Cynwyd, PA. E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Impact date 51849 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2010 / Notices The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign TA–W No. Subject firm 72,122 ......... 72,762 ......... 72,949 ......... The Dial Corporation ........................................................................................ Upper Connecticut Valley Hospital Association, Inc. Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Corporate Headquarters/Hard Drive Development Division. Custom Hoists, Inc., Standex International ...................................................... Consolidated Glass and Mirror Corp., Guardian Industries Corp. Plycraft Industries, Inc. ..................................................................................... Lamson Pipe Company .................................................................................... Komatsu Latin America Corporation, Komatsu America Corporation .............. Aero-Metric, Inc. ............................................................................................... Dish Network Service L.L.C., McKeesport Dispatch-DNS ............................... 73,225 73,579 73,629 73,655 73,702 74,297 74,355 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance TA–W No. 73,735 74,376 74,421 74,440 ......... ......... ......... ......... Location Hayesville, OH. Galax, VA. Huntington Beach, CA. Erie, PA. Miami, FL. Seattle, WA. McKeesport, PA. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Subject firm Location Product Action .................................................................................................. Ellwood Crankshaft & Machine Company ........................................................ Fairfield Chair Company, Plant #1 ................................................................... Hagemeyer North America, Sonepar USA ....................................................... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. Subject firm 73,890 ......... Pioneer Press, Ltd ............................................................................................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Location Subject firm 74,153 ......... Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Quality Division, Leased Workers from ManPower. Swets Information Service, Finance Department ............................................. Diebold Incorporated ........................................................................................ 74,231 ......... 74,282 ......... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of August 2, 2010 through August 6, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:31 Aug 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 Impact date Kaukauna, WI. workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve TA–W No. Impact date Dayton, OH. Hermitage, PA. Lenoir, NC. Charleston, SC. by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and TA–W No. Impact date St. Louis, MO. Colebrook, NH. Lake Forest, CA. on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES country) of section 222 have not been met. no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location Impact date Austin, TX. Runnemede, NJ. North Canton, OH. Date: August 11, 2010. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR [FR Doc. 2010–20790 Filed 8–20–10; 8:45 am] Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance BILLING CODE P PO 00000 Employment and Training Administration Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 162 (Monday, August 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51846-51849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20790]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
August 2, 2010 through August 6, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or

[[Page 51847]]

directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency;
and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,954................... RBP Chemical Technology, Milwaukee, WI.......... November 24, 2008.
Inc..
73,083................... Viewpointe Archive Parsippany, NJ......... December 11, 2008.
Services, LLC, On-Site
Leased Workers from
Atrium Staffing.
73,124................... Suite Simplicity, LLC, Greensboro, NC......... December 17, 2008.
Formerly Deco Lav, Inc.
73,309................... Ceratizit USA, Inc., Derry, PA.............. January 13, 2009.
zCrtsyixit S.A., On-
Site Leased Workers
from The Callos Company
and Adecco.
73,368................... NCI Group, Inc., DBA A&S Rocky Mount, NC........ January 25, 2009.
Building Systems;
Leased Workers of
Daniel Group.
73,483................... Insulet Corporation, Bedford, MA............ February 8, 2009.
Leased Workers from
John Galt Staffing, GCR
Professional Services,
etc.
73,556................... Flextronics America, Creedmoor, NC.......... February 23, 2009.
LLC, Flextronics
International USA, On-
Site Leased Workers
form Aerotek.
73,606................... Leased Workers From Brooklyn Park, MN...... March 1, 2009.
Teksystems, Ajilon, and
Pomeroy, Working On-
Site at Target
Corporation, North
Campus Rollout Room.
73,734................... Purchasingnet, Inc., Red Bank, NJ........... March 16, 2009.
Research & Development,
and General &
Administrative, ESW,
etc.
73,891................... Emerson Process McKinney, TX........... April 7, 2009.
Management Regulator
Technologies, Inc.,
Emerson Electric
Company.
73,975................... CareFusion 209, Middleton, WI.......... April 6, 2009.
Incorporated, Leased
Workers from Aerotek
and Adecco.
73,986................... AT&T Services, Inc., Bothell, WA............ April 19, 2009.
Information Technology.
73,991................... JBL Incorporated, Harman Northridge, CA......... June 25, 2010.
International
Industries, Leased
Workers Select
Staffing, etc.

[[Page 51848]]

73,992................... BP Solar International, Frederick, MD.......... April 23, 2009.
Inc., Subsidiary of BP
America International,
Inc., Leased Workers of
Aerotek, etc.
74,038................... Tyden Brooks Security Phillipsburg, NJ....... April 30, 2009.
Products Group, On-Site
Leased Workers from ERG
Staffing Service &
Express Employment, etc.
74,124................... Precision Wire Tualatin, OR........... April 23, 2009.
Components, Leased
Workers From Aerotek.
74,170................... Con-way Enterprise Portland, OR........... May 28, 2009.
Services, Accounting,
Fixed Assets and IT
Infrastructure
Divisions; etc.
74,172................... Toshiba America Consumer Lebanon, TN............ May 28, 2009.
Products, Inc.,
Tennessee Operations
Product Return Center
(``PRC'').
74,187................... Fairchild Semiconductor, Mountaintop, PA........ June 3, 2009.
Leased Workers from
NStar Global Services.
74,209................... Citicorp Credit Tucson, AZ............. June 1, 2009.
Services, Inc. (USA),
Risk and Fraud
Operations Divisions,
Citigroup, Inc.
74,292................... Precision Dynamics San Fernando, CA....... June 14, 2009.
Corporation.
74,299................... Anthem Blue Cross and South Portland, ME..... June 24, 2009.
Blue Shield of Maine,
Wellpoint, Inc., Leased
Workers Iconma,
Indecon, Pinnacle, etc.
74,382................... J.P. Morgan Chase, Troy Troy, MI............... July 12, 2009.
Telephone Banking.
74,397................... Progress Software Bedford, MA............ July 12, 2009.
Corporation, Off-Site
Workers Reporting to
Bedford, Massachusetts
from Arizona, etc.
74,398................... Progress Software El Segundo, CA......... July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,399................... Progress Software San Francisco, CA...... July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,400................... Progress Software Nashua, NH............. July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,401................... Savvion, A Progress Santa Clara, CA........ July 12, 2009.
Software Company.
74,402................... DataDirect Technologies. Los Gatos, CA.......... July 12, 2009.
74,403................... Progress Software Oak Brook, IL.......... July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,404................... Progress Software Largo, MD.............. July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,405................... Progress Software New York, NY........... July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,406................... DataDirect Technologies Morrisville, NC........ July 12, 2009.
Headquarters.
74,407................... Progress Software Austin, TX............. July 12, 2009.
Corporation.
74,408................... DataDirect Technologies. Sugar Land, TX......... July 12, 2009.
74,409................... DataDirect Technologies. Fairfax, VA............ July 12, 2009.
74,410................... DataDirect Technologies. Norfolk, VA............ July 12, 2009.
74,431................... Evonik Cyro, LLC, Evonik Sanford, ME............ July 22, 2009.
Industries, On-Site
Leased Workers from
Manpower.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.

[[Page 51849]]

The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of August 2, 2010 through August 6, 2010.
Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services,
or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of
determinations.

Date: August 11, 2010.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-20790 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.