Woven Electric Blankets From China, 51482 [2010-20671]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
51482
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 161 / Friday, August 20, 2010 / Notices
Commission has determined to grant
Respondents’ motions for leave.
On May 10, 2010, Complainants filed
their own petition seeking modification
of the Commission’s remedial orders.
On May 27, 2010, the IA and
Respondents filed responses to
Complainants’ petition for modification
of the Commission’s remedial orders.
Having examined the petitions
seeking modification of the limited
exclusion order and the cease-and-desist
orders, and the responses thereto, the
Commission determined that
Respondents’ petition complies with 19
U.S.C. 1337(k)(2) and 19 CFR 210.76(a),
but that Complainants’ petition does
not. Accordingly, the Commission has
determined to institute a modification
proceeding to consider Respondents’
petition, and has delegated the
proceeding to the Chief Administrative
Law Judge for assignment to a presiding
administrative law judge.
While Broadcom’s allegations of
changed circumstances do not warrant
the institution of a modification
proceeding under Commission rule
210.76, the party might find a formal
enforcement proceeding under rule
210.75(b) a more suitable avenue to
address its concerns. In fact, the
Commission indicated as much in 2009
when it declined Broadcom’s request to
initiate an informal enforcement
proceeding under 210.75(a), in light of
‘‘the factual nature of the allegations’’ in
the request. Separate from the particular
dispute at issue in this investigation, the
Commission is preparing to commence
the third in a series of five-year surveys
on the effectiveness of section 337
exclusion orders. As indicated when the
Commission gave notice of its survey
preparations, it will seek feedback on
the experience of complainants ‘‘in
policing the exclusion order,
particularly with respect to any
investigatory efforts and any
interactions with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.’’ 75 FR 8398 (Feb. 24,
2010). After evaluating the survey
responses, the Commission may
consider whether there are any
appropriate actions for the Commission
to undertake to enhance the
effectiveness of the orders.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210.76 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.76).
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:19 Aug 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued: August 16, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
Electric Blankets From China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–1163 (Final).
[FR Doc. 2010–20674 Filed 8–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 10, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–20671 Filed 8–19–10; 8:45 am]
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1163 (Final)]
Woven Electric Blankets From China
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigation, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from China of woven electric blankets,
provided for in subheading 6301.10.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV).
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA)
Background
The Commission instituted this
investigation effective June 30, 2009,
following receipt of a petition filed with
the Commission and Commerce by
Sunbeam Products, Inc., doing business
as Jarden Consumer Solutions, Boca
Raton, FL. The final phase of the
investigation was scheduled by the
Commission following notification of a
preliminary determination by
Commerce that imports of woven
electric blankets from China were being
sold at LTFV within the meaning of
section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of
the final phase of the Commission’s
investigation and of a public hearing to
be held in connection therewith was
given by posting copies of the notice in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register of March
11, 2010 (75 FR 11557). The hearing was
held in Washington, DC, on June 29,
2010, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this investigation to
the Secretary of Commerce on August
10, 2010. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
4177 (August 2010), entitled Woven
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that on August
11, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree
(‘‘Decree’’) in United States and the State
of South Dakota v. Jeraldine Borsch
Fahrni, the Chester A. Borsch, Jr. Trust,
and Chester A. Borsch, Jr. as Trustee of
the Chester A. Borsch, Jr. Trust, Case
No. 5:10–CV–05068–JLV, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota, Western
Division. The case was brought under
Sections 107(a) and 113(g)(2) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a)
and 9613(g)(2), for the recovery of
response costs related to the cleanup at
the Gilt Edge Mine Superfund Site
(‘‘Site’’) in Lawrence County, South
Dakota.
The Consent Decree requires the
Defendants to confess to (1) entry of
judgment in the amount of $890,000; (2)
agree to transfer the Site properties they
own to the State of South Dakota; and
(3) assign any insurance coverage
related to the Site to the United States.
The United States and the State of
South Dakota filed a Complaint
simultaneous with the Consent Decree
alleging that the Defendants are jointly
and severally liable for response costs
related to the cleanup at the Gilt Edge
Mine Superfund Site in Lawrence
County, South Dakota. 42 U.S.C.
9607(a), 9613(g)(2). The Consent Decree
would resolve the claims against the
Defendants as described in the
Complaint.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Decree. Comments should
be addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and either e-mailed
to the pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov
or mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 161 (Friday, August 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 51482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1163 (Final)]
Woven Electric Blankets From China
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject
investigation, the United States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act
of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United
States is materially injured by reason of imports from China of woven
electric blankets, provided for in subheading 6301.10.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted this investigation effective June 30,
2009, following receipt of a petition filed with the Commission and
Commerce by Sunbeam Products, Inc., doing business as Jarden Consumer
Solutions, Boca Raton, FL. The final phase of the investigation was
scheduled by the Commission following notification of a preliminary
determination by Commerce that imports of woven electric blankets from
China were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of
the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final
phase of the Commission's investigation and of a public hearing to be
held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of
March 11, 2010 (75 FR 11557). The hearing was held in Washington, DC,
on June 29, 2010, and all persons who requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation
to the Secretary of Commerce on August 10, 2010. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4177 (August 2010),
entitled Woven Electric Blankets From China: Investigation No. 731-TA-
1163 (Final).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 10, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-20671 Filed 8-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
