Drill Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Correction to the Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination, 51014-51015 [2010-20500]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
51014
EP, minus the amount determined to
constitute an export subsidy in the
companion countervailing duty
investigation. See, e.g., Notice of Final
Shanxi Yida
Shanxi Yida
0.00
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Special
Special
Fair Value: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23
Steel Imp. &
Steel Group
From India, 69 FR 67306, 67307
Exp. Co.,
Co., Ltd.
(November 17, 2004). In this case,
Ltd.
Shanxi Fenglei Shanxi
106.82 because the DP–Master Group benefitted
Drilling
Fenglei
from an export subsidy, we will instruct
Tools Co.,
Drilling
CBP to require an antidumping cash
Ltd.
Tools Co.,
deposit or posting of a bond equal to the
Ltd.
weighted-average amount by which the
Jiangsu
Jiangsu
106.82 NV exceeds the CEP for the DP–Master
Shuguang
Shuguang
Group, minus the amount determined to
Huayang
Huayang
constitute an export subsidy.
Drilling Tool,
Drilling
Because Baoshan, Yida, and Separate
Co. Ltd.
Tool, Co.
Rate Companies did not benefit from
Ltd.
Jiangyin Long- Jiangyin Long106.82 any export subsidy, we will instruct
CBP to require an antidumping cash
Bright Drill
Bright Drill
Pipe ManuPipe Manudeposit or the posting of a bond for each
facturing
facturing
entry equal to the weighted-average
Co., Ltd.
Co., Ltd.
amount by which the NV exceeds U.S.
PRC-wide En.......................
429.29 price, as indicated above.
tity.
For all other entries of drill pipe from
the PRC, the following cash deposit/
Disclosure
bonding instructions apply: (1) For all
PRC exporters of drill pipe which have
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
not received their own rate, the cashof publication of this notice to parties in deposit or bonding rate will be the PRCthis proceeding in accordance with 19
wide rate; (2) for all non-PRC exporters
CFR 351.224(b).
of drill pipe from the PRC which have
not received their own rate, the cashSuspension of Liquidation
deposit or bonding rate will be the rate
In accordance with section 733(d) of
applicable to the exporter/producer
the Act, we will instruct CBP to suspend combinations that supplied that nonliquidation of all entries of drill pipe
PRC exporter. This suspension of
from the PRC as described in the ‘‘Scope liquidation will remain in effect until
of Investigation’’ section, entered, or
further notice.
withdrawn from warehouse, for
International Trade Commission
consumption from the DP–Master
Notification
Group, Baoshan, the Separate Rate
Respondents, and the PRC-wide entity
In accordance with section 733(f) of
on or after the date of publication of this the Act, we have notified the ITC of our
notice in the Federal Register. For Yida, preliminary affirmative determination of
we will not instruct CBP to suspend
sales at LTFV. Section 735(b)(2) of the
liquidation of any entries of drill pipe
Act requires the ITC to make its final
from the PRC as described in the ‘‘Scope determination as to whether the
of Investigation’’ section that are
domestic industry in the United States
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, is materially injured, or threatened with
for consumption on or after the date of
material injury, by reason of imports of
publication of this notice in the Federal drill pipe, or sales (or the likelihood of
Register.
sales) for importation, of the
The Department has determined in
merchandise under investigation within
Drill Pipe From the People’s Republic of 45 days of our final determination.
China: Preliminary Affirmative
Public Comment
Countervailing Duty Determination, 75
FR 33245 (June 11, 2010) (‘‘CVD PRC
Case briefs or other written comments
Drill Pipe Prelim’’), that the merchandise may be submitted to the Assistant
under investigation, exported and
Secretary for Import Administration no
produced by the DP–Master Group,
later than seven business days after the
benefitted from an export subsidy.
date on which the final verification
Where the merchandise under
report is issued in this proceeding.
investigation is also subject to a
Rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised
concurrent countervailing duty
in case briefs must be received no later
investigation, we instruct CBP to require than five business days after the
an antidumping cash deposit or posting deadline date for case briefs. See 19 CFR
of a bond equal to the weighted-average 351.309(c)(i) and (d). A list of
amount by which the NV exceeds the
authorities used and an executive
Exporter
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Producer
18:40 Aug 17, 2010
WeightedAverage
margin
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
summary of issues should accompany
any briefs submitted to the Department.
This summary should be limited to five
pages total, including footnotes.
In accordance with section 774 of the
Act, and if requested, we will hold a
public hearing, to afford interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
arguments raised in case or rebuttal
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
we intend to hold the hearing shortly
after the deadline of submission of
rebuttal briefs at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a
time and location to be determined.
Parties should confirm by telephone the
date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, Room 1870, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the
issues to be discussed. At the hearing,
each party may make an affirmative
presentation only on issues raised in
that party’s case brief and may make
rebuttal presentations only on
arguments included in that party’s
rebuttal brief.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–20512 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–965]
Drill Pipe From the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Correction to the
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances, and Postponement of
Final Determination
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Dach, Susan Pulongbarit, or Matthew
Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices
Dated: August 11, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Correction
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1655,
(202) 482–4031, or (202) 482–2312,
respectively.
International Trade Administration
On August 6, 2010, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) released
the preliminary determination of the
investigation for drill pipe from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) to
interested parties. See Drill Pipe from
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less than Fair Value and Affirmative
Determination of Critical
Circumstances, and Postponement of
Final Determination, signed August 5,
2010 (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
Subsequent to the announcement and
release of the Preliminary
Determination, the Department
identified an inadvertent error.
Specifically, the Preliminary
Determination incorrectly stated that the
Department determined a weightedaverage dumping margin of 7.64 percent
for Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. (‘‘Baoshan’’)
and a dumping margin for the separate
rate respondents 1 of 106.82 percent.
However, the correct rate, as noted in
Baoshan’s Analysis Memorandum is
2.66 percent. See Memorandum to the
File, through Scot T. Fullerton, from
Susan Pulongbarit, regarding
Antidumping Investigation of Drill Pipe
from the People’s Republic of China:
Analysis for the Preliminary
Determination of Baoshan Iron & Steel
Co., Ltd., dated August 5, 2010. Because
we used Baoshan’s rate to calculate the
separate rate margin, we have also
corrected the average dumping margin
for the separate rate respondents to
104.33 percent. To resolve these
discrepancies, the Preliminary
Determination is hereby corrected to
identify Baoshan’s weighted-average
dumping margin as 2.66 percent and the
average dumping margin for the
separate rate respondents as 104.33
percent. We are publishing this
correction simultaneously with the
Preliminary Determination.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
[A–427–001]
1 The separate rate respondents are Shanxi
Fenglei Drilling Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Shuguang
Huayang Drilling Tool, Co. Ltd., and Jiangyin LongBright Drill Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Aug 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
[FR Doc. 2010–20500 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Sorbitol From France: Notice of
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 28, 2010, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on sorbitol
from France. The review covers one
producer/exporter of sorbitol, Syral
S.A.S. (Syral). Based on the withdrawal
of the requests for review from Archer
Daniels Midland Company (ADM) and
Corn Products International (CP),
domestic producers of sorbitol, we are
now rescinding this administrative
review in full.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 1, 2010, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on sorbitol
from France for the period April 1,
2009, through March 31, 2010. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 75 FR 16426
(April 1, 2010). On April 5, 2010, the
Department received a request from CP
that the Department conduct an
administrative review covering Syral.
On April 30, 2010, the Department
received a request from ADM that the
Department conduct an administrative
review covering Syral. On May 28, 2010,
the Department published in the
Federal Register the notice of initiation
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51015
of the 2009–2010 administrative review
of sorbitol from France. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 29976
(May 28, 2010).
On June 3, 2010, the Department
issued its antidumping duty
questionnaire to Syral. On June 25,
2010, CP withdrew its request for
review of Syral. On August 2, 2010,
ADM withdrew its request for review of
Syral.
Period of Review
The period of review (POR) at the
time the review was initiated was April
1, 2009, through March 31, 2010.
Subsequently, the antidumping duty
order on sorbitol from France was
revoked, effective August 5, 2009. See
Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order
on Sorbitol from France, 75 FR 42380
(July 21, 2010). Consequently, the POR
for the administrative review became
April 1, 2009, through August 4, 2009.
Scope of the Order
The products under review are
shipments of crystalline sorbitol.
Crystalline sorbitol is a polyol produced
by the catalytic hydrogenation of sugars
(glucose). It is used in the production of
sugarless gum, candy, groceries, and
pharmaceuticals. The above-described
sorbitol is currently classifiable under
item 2905.44.00 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description remains dispositive.
Rescission of Antidumping
Administrative Review
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations provides that
the Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws at a later date if the
Department determines it is reasonable
to extend the time limit for withdrawing
the request. CP and ADM withdrew
their requests for review of Syral within
the 90-day deadline.
Assessment Instructions
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the company for
which this review is rescinded,
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM
18AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51014-51015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20500]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-965]
Drill Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Notice of
Correction to the Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and
Postponement of Final Determination
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Dach, Susan Pulongbarit, or
Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,
[[Page 51015]]
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1655, (202) 482-4031, or
(202) 482-2312, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
On August 6, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'')
released the preliminary determination of the investigation for drill
pipe from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') to interested
parties. See Drill Pipe from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement
of Final Determination, signed August 5, 2010 (``Preliminary
Determination''). Subsequent to the announcement and release of the
Preliminary Determination, the Department identified an inadvertent
error.
Specifically, the Preliminary Determination incorrectly stated that
the Department determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.64
percent for Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. (``Baoshan'') and a dumping margin
for the separate rate respondents \1\ of 106.82 percent. However, the
correct rate, as noted in Baoshan's Analysis Memorandum is 2.66
percent. See Memorandum to the File, through Scot T. Fullerton, from
Susan Pulongbarit, regarding Antidumping Investigation of Drill Pipe
from the People's Republic of China: Analysis for the Preliminary
Determination of Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., dated August 5, 2010.
Because we used Baoshan's rate to calculate the separate rate margin,
we have also corrected the average dumping margin for the separate rate
respondents to 104.33 percent. To resolve these discrepancies, the
Preliminary Determination is hereby corrected to identify Baoshan's
weighted-average dumping margin as 2.66 percent and the average dumping
margin for the separate rate respondents as 104.33 percent. We are
publishing this correction simultaneously with the Preliminary
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The separate rate respondents are Shanxi Fenglei Drilling
Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Shuguang Huayang Drilling Tool, Co. Ltd.,
and Jiangyin Long-Bright Drill Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: August 11, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-20500 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
