Drill Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Correction to the Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination, 51014-51015 [2010-20500]

Download as PDF 51014 EP, minus the amount determined to constitute an export subsidy in the companion countervailing duty investigation. See, e.g., Notice of Final Shanxi Yida Shanxi Yida 0.00 Determination of Sales at Less Than Special Special Fair Value: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 Steel Imp. & Steel Group From India, 69 FR 67306, 67307 Exp. Co., Co., Ltd. (November 17, 2004). In this case, Ltd. Shanxi Fenglei Shanxi 106.82 because the DP–Master Group benefitted Drilling Fenglei from an export subsidy, we will instruct Tools Co., Drilling CBP to require an antidumping cash Ltd. Tools Co., deposit or posting of a bond equal to the Ltd. weighted-average amount by which the Jiangsu Jiangsu 106.82 NV exceeds the CEP for the DP–Master Shuguang Shuguang Group, minus the amount determined to Huayang Huayang constitute an export subsidy. Drilling Tool, Drilling Because Baoshan, Yida, and Separate Co. Ltd. Tool, Co. Rate Companies did not benefit from Ltd. Jiangyin Long- Jiangyin Long106.82 any export subsidy, we will instruct CBP to require an antidumping cash Bright Drill Bright Drill Pipe ManuPipe Manudeposit or the posting of a bond for each facturing facturing entry equal to the weighted-average Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. amount by which the NV exceeds U.S. PRC-wide En....................... 429.29 price, as indicated above. tity. For all other entries of drill pipe from the PRC, the following cash deposit/ Disclosure bonding instructions apply: (1) For all PRC exporters of drill pipe which have We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date not received their own rate, the cashof publication of this notice to parties in deposit or bonding rate will be the PRCthis proceeding in accordance with 19 wide rate; (2) for all non-PRC exporters CFR 351.224(b). of drill pipe from the PRC which have not received their own rate, the cashSuspension of Liquidation deposit or bonding rate will be the rate In accordance with section 733(d) of applicable to the exporter/producer the Act, we will instruct CBP to suspend combinations that supplied that nonliquidation of all entries of drill pipe PRC exporter. This suspension of from the PRC as described in the ‘‘Scope liquidation will remain in effect until of Investigation’’ section, entered, or further notice. withdrawn from warehouse, for International Trade Commission consumption from the DP–Master Notification Group, Baoshan, the Separate Rate Respondents, and the PRC-wide entity In accordance with section 733(f) of on or after the date of publication of this the Act, we have notified the ITC of our notice in the Federal Register. For Yida, preliminary affirmative determination of we will not instruct CBP to suspend sales at LTFV. Section 735(b)(2) of the liquidation of any entries of drill pipe Act requires the ITC to make its final from the PRC as described in the ‘‘Scope determination as to whether the of Investigation’’ section that are domestic industry in the United States entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, is materially injured, or threatened with for consumption on or after the date of material injury, by reason of imports of publication of this notice in the Federal drill pipe, or sales (or the likelihood of Register. sales) for importation, of the The Department has determined in merchandise under investigation within Drill Pipe From the People’s Republic of 45 days of our final determination. China: Preliminary Affirmative Public Comment Countervailing Duty Determination, 75 FR 33245 (June 11, 2010) (‘‘CVD PRC Case briefs or other written comments Drill Pipe Prelim’’), that the merchandise may be submitted to the Assistant under investigation, exported and Secretary for Import Administration no produced by the DP–Master Group, later than seven business days after the benefitted from an export subsidy. date on which the final verification Where the merchandise under report is issued in this proceeding. investigation is also subject to a Rebuttal briefs limited to issues raised concurrent countervailing duty in case briefs must be received no later investigation, we instruct CBP to require than five business days after the an antidumping cash deposit or posting deadline date for case briefs. See 19 CFR of a bond equal to the weighted-average 351.309(c)(i) and (d). A list of amount by which the NV exceeds the authorities used and an executive Exporter sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices VerDate Mar<15>2010 Producer 18:40 Aug 17, 2010 WeightedAverage margin Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 summary of issues should accompany any briefs submitted to the Department. This summary should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In accordance with section 774 of the Act, and if requested, we will hold a public hearing, to afford interested parties an opportunity to comment on arguments raised in case or rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, we intend to hold the hearing shortly after the deadline of submission of rebuttal briefs at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 1870, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Requests should contain the party’s name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. At the hearing, each party may make an affirmative presentation only on issues raised in that party’s case brief and may make rebuttal presentations only on arguments included in that party’s rebuttal brief. This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 5, 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–20512 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–965] Drill Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Correction to the Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Dach, Susan Pulongbarit, or Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 18, 2010 / Notices Dated: August 11, 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Correction sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1655, (202) 482–4031, or (202) 482–2312, respectively. International Trade Administration On August 6, 2010, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) released the preliminary determination of the investigation for drill pipe from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) to interested parties. See Drill Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement of Final Determination, signed August 5, 2010 (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). Subsequent to the announcement and release of the Preliminary Determination, the Department identified an inadvertent error. Specifically, the Preliminary Determination incorrectly stated that the Department determined a weightedaverage dumping margin of 7.64 percent for Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. (‘‘Baoshan’’) and a dumping margin for the separate rate respondents 1 of 106.82 percent. However, the correct rate, as noted in Baoshan’s Analysis Memorandum is 2.66 percent. See Memorandum to the File, through Scot T. Fullerton, from Susan Pulongbarit, regarding Antidumping Investigation of Drill Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Analysis for the Preliminary Determination of Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., dated August 5, 2010. Because we used Baoshan’s rate to calculate the separate rate margin, we have also corrected the average dumping margin for the separate rate respondents to 104.33 percent. To resolve these discrepancies, the Preliminary Determination is hereby corrected to identify Baoshan’s weighted-average dumping margin as 2.66 percent and the average dumping margin for the separate rate respondents as 104.33 percent. We are publishing this correction simultaneously with the Preliminary Determination. This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. [A–427–001] 1 The separate rate respondents are Shanxi Fenglei Drilling Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Shuguang Huayang Drilling Tool, Co. Ltd., and Jiangyin LongBright Drill Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:40 Aug 17, 2010 Jkt 220001 [FR Doc. 2010–20500 Filed 8–17–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P Sorbitol From France: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 28, 2010, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on sorbitol from France. The review covers one producer/exporter of sorbitol, Syral S.A.S. (Syral). Based on the withdrawal of the requests for review from Archer Daniels Midland Company (ADM) and Corn Products International (CP), domestic producers of sorbitol, we are now rescinding this administrative review in full. DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482– 0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On April 1, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on sorbitol from France for the period April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 75 FR 16426 (April 1, 2010). On April 5, 2010, the Department received a request from CP that the Department conduct an administrative review covering Syral. On April 30, 2010, the Department received a request from ADM that the Department conduct an administrative review covering Syral. On May 28, 2010, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51015 of the 2009–2010 administrative review of sorbitol from France. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 29976 (May 28, 2010). On June 3, 2010, the Department issued its antidumping duty questionnaire to Syral. On June 25, 2010, CP withdrew its request for review of Syral. On August 2, 2010, ADM withdrew its request for review of Syral. Period of Review The period of review (POR) at the time the review was initiated was April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010. Subsequently, the antidumping duty order on sorbitol from France was revoked, effective August 5, 2009. See Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order on Sorbitol from France, 75 FR 42380 (July 21, 2010). Consequently, the POR for the administrative review became April 1, 2009, through August 4, 2009. Scope of the Order The products under review are shipments of crystalline sorbitol. Crystalline sorbitol is a polyol produced by the catalytic hydrogenation of sugars (glucose). It is used in the production of sugarless gum, candy, groceries, and pharmaceuticals. The above-described sorbitol is currently classifiable under item 2905.44.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description remains dispositive. Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) of the Department’s regulations provides that the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review, or withdraws at a later date if the Department determines it is reasonable to extend the time limit for withdrawing the request. CP and ADM withdrew their requests for review of Syral within the 90-day deadline. Assessment Instructions The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For the company for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51014-51015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-965]


Drill Pipe From the People's Republic of China: Notice of 
Correction to the Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and 
Postponement of Final Determination

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni Dach, Susan Pulongbarit, or 
Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,

[[Page 51015]]

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1655, (202) 482-4031, or 
(202) 482-2312, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    On August 6, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
released the preliminary determination of the investigation for drill 
pipe from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') to interested 
parties. See Drill Pipe from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and 
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Postponement 
of Final Determination, signed August 5, 2010 (``Preliminary 
Determination''). Subsequent to the announcement and release of the 
Preliminary Determination, the Department identified an inadvertent 
error.
    Specifically, the Preliminary Determination incorrectly stated that 
the Department determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.64 
percent for Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. (``Baoshan'') and a dumping margin 
for the separate rate respondents \1\ of 106.82 percent. However, the 
correct rate, as noted in Baoshan's Analysis Memorandum is 2.66 
percent. See Memorandum to the File, through Scot T. Fullerton, from 
Susan Pulongbarit, regarding Antidumping Investigation of Drill Pipe 
from the People's Republic of China: Analysis for the Preliminary 
Determination of Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., dated August 5, 2010. 
Because we used Baoshan's rate to calculate the separate rate margin, 
we have also corrected the average dumping margin for the separate rate 
respondents to 104.33 percent. To resolve these discrepancies, the 
Preliminary Determination is hereby corrected to identify Baoshan's 
weighted-average dumping margin as 2.66 percent and the average dumping 
margin for the separate rate respondents as 104.33 percent. We are 
publishing this correction simultaneously with the Preliminary 
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The separate rate respondents are Shanxi Fenglei Drilling 
Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Shuguang Huayang Drilling Tool, Co. Ltd., 
and Jiangyin Long-Bright Drill Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is published in accordance with section 777(i) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

     Dated: August 11, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-20500 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P