Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 49529-49533 [2010-20039]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38141).
At the request of the petitioners, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in internal design
and engineering services for chips used
in networking and multimedia products.
The company reports that workers
leased from Manpower, were employed
on-site at the Austin, Texas location of
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
Networking and Multimedia Group
(‘‘NMG’’), excluding the Multimedia
Applications Division, including on-site
workers of Synergy Services, Craftcorp,
Directions Engineering Company,
Netpolarity, Inc. and Tac Worldwide.
The Department has determined that
these workers were sufficiently under
the control of the subject firm to be
considered leased workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Manpower, working on-site at the
Austin, Texas location of Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc., Networking and
Multimedia Group (‘‘NMG’’), excluding
the Multimedia Applications Division,
including on-site workers of Synergy
Services, Craftcorp, Directions
Engineering Company, Netpolarity, Inc.
and Tac Worldwide.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–71,551A is hereby issued as
follows:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘All workers of Freescale Semiconductor,
Inc., Networking and Multimedia Group
(‘‘NMG’’), excluding the Multimedia
Applications Division, including on-site
workers of Synergy Services, Craftcorp,
Directions Engineering Company,
Netpolarity, Inc., Tac Worldwide and
Manpower, Austin, Texas, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after July 1, 2008 through
June 17, 2012, and all workers in the group
threatened with total or partial separation
from employment on the date of certification
through two years from the date of
certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.’’
Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
August 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–20027 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of July 26, 2010
through July 30, 2010.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both,
of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) The increase in imports
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49529
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition
from a foreign country by the workers’
firm of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
49530
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) Notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally
or partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
72,362 ...............
72,653 ...............
P.M. Kelly, Inc., Realty Road ..........................................................
Da-Tech Corporation, Leased Workers from Judge Technical
Services, Synerfac Technical, etc.
Precision Mold & Engineering, Inc. .................................................
Sunrise Tool and Die, Inc. ..............................................................
Thyssenkrupp Presta Steering Group .............................................
Charles D. Owen Mfg. Co. Inc., Springs Global U.S., Inc. .............
Narriot Industries, LLC ....................................................................
Flexsteel Industries, Inc., Leased Workers from Sedona Staffing
Technicolor Video Cassette of Michigan, Thomson, Home Entertainment Services, Leased Workers Select Staffing, etc.
Prestolite Wire Corporation, Leased Workers from Express Services and Staffmark.
General Motors Vehicle Manufacturing, General Motors Corp.,
Leased Workers Aerotek and Kelly Services.
Ashland, ME ...............................
Ivyland, PA .................................
September 18, 2008.
September 24, 2008.
Warren, MI ..................................
Henderson, KY ...........................
Ladson, SC .................................
Swannanoa, NC .........................
Boykins, VA ................................
Dubuque, IA ...............................
Detroit, MI ...................................
November 19, 2008.
November 20, 2008.
December 1, 2008.
February 2, 2009.
February 22, 2009.
February 12, 2010.
March 1, 2009.
Paragould, AR ............................
April 14, 2009.
Shreveport, LA ...........................
August 28, 2010.
72,905
72,996
73,040
73,469
73,557
73,769
73,771
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
73,964 ...............
74,081 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
72,377 ...............
72,408 ...............
Match.Com, Workers Whose Wages are Reported Under PRC ....
Capmark Capital, Inc., Capmark Financial Group, Debtor in Possession, Leased Workers Spherion and ACS.
Freeport-McMoran Safford, Inc., Including All Reclamation Group
Employees.
Circuit Services Worldwide, Subsidiary of Pan-Co International
Company, Ltd.
Ellcon National, Machine Shop In Plant One, Faverly Transport,
Leased On-Site Workers Aerotek.
Dakota Imaging ...............................................................................
Wacker Neuson Corporation, Wacher Neuson SE .........................
Bombardier Transportation, Bombardier Mass Transit, Leased
Workers form Eastern Technical Services.
Farley’s & Sathers Candy Company, Inc., Leased Workers from
Select Staffing.
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., Southwest, Leased Workers
from Kelly Services.
Robert Bosch, LLC, Leased Workers from Aerotek, Cucor U.S.,
etc.
Robert Bosch, LLC, Leased Workers from Aerotek, Cucor U.S.,
etc.
Liz Claiborne, Inc., Finance Division ...............................................
Local Insight Media, Inc., Corporate Services Division ..................
Jacksonville, NC .........................
Granville, OH ..............................
September 21, 2008.
September 24, 2008.
Safford, AZ .................................
October 21, 2008.
Bellevue, WA ..............................
November 9, 2008.
Greenville, SC ............................
January 10, 2009.
El Paso, TX ................................
Menomonee Falls, WI ................
Plattsburgh, NY ..........................
January 12, 2009.
January 27, 2009.
January 26, 2009.
Chattanooga, TN ........................
February 4, 2009.
Sherman, TX ..............................
February 5, 2009.
Plymouth, MI ..............................
February 10, 2009.
Farmington Hills, MI ...................
February 10, 2009.
North Bergen, NJ .......................
Englewood, CO ..........................
February 18, 2009.
March 22, 2009.
72,716 ...............
72,829 ...............
73,248 ...............
73,271 ...............
73,376 ...............
73,379 ...............
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
73,491 ...............
73,493 ...............
73,652 ...............
73,652A ............
73,679 ...............
73,768 ...............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
49531
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
73,824 ...............
Honeywell International, Inc., Automation and Control Solutions
Division.
Amphenol TCS ................................................................................
Goodrich Corporation, Landing Gear Division ................................
Damco USA, Inc., Finance Division ................................................
SuperMedia, Inc., Formerly Idearc Media LLC, Publishing Operations Group.
Bowne Technology Enterprise, LLC, Bowne and Company, Inc.,
Help Desk Division.
Liz Claiborne, Inc., Corporate Manufacturing Department .............
Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., Pharmaceutical Manufacturing, Technical Operations and Quality Management.
Microsemi Corp. Massachusetts, Testing Services ........................
Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement
Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement
Highland Lakes Software, Inc. ........................................................
National Sales Company, Stanley Black and Decker, Leased
Workers of Lumea Staffing.
National Manufacturing Company, Stanley Black & Decker, Stanley National Hardware, Leased Workers Lumea Staff.
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Companies, Workers’ Compensation Statistical Reporting.
HAVI Logistics, North America, Havi Group, LP ............................
Becton, Dickinson, and Company, BD Medical; Sharps Disposal
Systems, Leased Workers The Eastridge Group, etc.
PerTronix, Inc. .................................................................................
Andrew Wireless Solution, CommScope, Leased Workers Manpower and Griffith Security.
Frank Russell Company, Administrative Service Center ................
Rock Island, IL ...........................
March 29, 2009.
Milpitas, CA ................................
Cleveland, OH ............................
Madison, NJ ...............................
St. Petersburg, FL ......................
April 6, 2009.
March 18, 2009.
April 13, 2009.
May 2, 2009.
Piscataway, NJ ...........................
May 5, 2009.
North Bergen, NJ .......................
Nutley, NJ ...................................
May 12, 2009.
May 11, 2009.
Lawrence, MA ............................
Moosic, PA .................................
Dubuque, IA ...............................
Austin, TX ...................................
Sterling, IL ..................................
May 19, 2009.
June 17, 2009.
June 17, 2009.
June 15, 2009.
June 21, 2009.
Rock Falls, IL .............................
June 21, 2009.
Hartford, CT ................................
June 22, 2009.
Livonia, MI ..................................
Oceanside, CA ...........................
June 25, 2009.
June 8, 2009.
Rancho Dominguez, CA .............
Newton, NC ................................
June 25, 2009.
June 29, 2009.
Tacoma, WA ...............................
July 21, 2009.
73,870
73,872
73,914
74,033
...............
...............
...............
...............
74,051 ...............
74,105 ...............
74,144 ...............
74,178 ...............
74,266 ...............
74,266A ............
74,283 ...............
74,287 ...............
74,288 ...............
74,298 ...............
74,306 ...............
74,313 ...............
74,322 ...............
74,332 ...............
74,420 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers
Impact date
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
72,850 ...............
Kasto, Inc., Keuro Besitz GMBH & Co, Leased Workers of Industrial Employees, etc.
Hayes Enterprises, Inc. ...................................................................
Cranberry Lumber Company ...........................................................
Form Tech Fraser ...........................................................................
Export, PA ..................................
November 13, 2008.
Potomac, MT ..............................
Beckley, WV ...............................
Fraser, MI ...................................
January 18, 2009.
April 14, 2009.
April 8, 2009.
73,348 ...............
73,910 ...............
74,026 ...............
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have
been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
72,222 ...............
YRC, Inc., YRC Worldwide, Inc. .....................................................
Richfield, OH ..............................
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W No.
Subject firm
72,901 ...............
73,939 ...............
Sequel Software, Inc. ......................................................................
C3I, Inc., Leased Workers from Manpower and Express ...............
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
September 3, 2008.
(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Location
Impact date
Durango, CO.
Wilkes-Barre, PA.
(decline in sales or production, or both)
and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
PO 00000
Impact date
services to a foreign country) of section
222 have not been met.
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
49532
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
74,270 ...............
74,270A ............
74,270B ............
74,270C ............
74,270D ............
Lockheed
Lockheed
Lockheed
Lockheed
Lockheed
Martin
Martin
Martin
Martin
Martin
Systems
Systems
Systems
Systems
Systems
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
.............................................
Subject firm
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
73,212 ...............
73,285 ...............
73,301 ...............
73,401 ...............
73,841 ...............
73,894 ...............
74,334 ...............
74,415 ...............
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and
(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of
74,029 ...............
Mohican Juvenile Correctional Facility ............................................
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Grimes, IA.
Minneapolis, MN.
Newfield, NJ.
High Point, NC.
Dayton, OH.
Fremont, CA.
Morrisville, NC.
Kimberly, WI.
TA–W No.
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Verona, VA.
Grandville, MI.
South Burlington, VT.
West Mifflin, PA.
Ballefontaine, OH.
Auburn, CA.
Decatur, AL.
Hartselle, AL.
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
PO 00000
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
Location
McQuay International ......................................................................
Enterprise Tool and Die ..................................................................
Burton Snowboards, Inc ..................................................................
American Superconductor Corporation ...........................................
Siemens ...........................................................................................
Dyrsmith, LLC, DBA Precision-works Manufacturing .....................
CR Compressors, LLC ....................................................................
CR Compressors, LLC ....................................................................
Impact date
Perrysville, OH.
Subject firm
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Location
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Fort Payne, AL.
Berlin, CT.
Totowa, NJ.
Bethlehem, PA.
Rockford, IL.
Fort Worth, TX.
Kankakee, IL.
Brady, TX.
Subject firm
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
Impact date
services from a foreign country) of
section 222 have not been met.
TA–W No.
72,537
72,645
73,886
74,043
74,083
74,190
74,360
74,361
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Location
CJ’s Wholesale Socks, Inc. .............................................................
Nielsen Hardware, Actuant Corporation .........................................
Precision Custom Coatings .............................................................
Circuit City, Inc., Bethlehem Distribution Center ............................
Camcar Aerospace ..........................................................................
Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. ................................................
American Spring Wire Corp. ...........................................................
Oglebay Norton Industrial Sands, Inc., D/B/A Carmeuse Industrial
Sands.
Ryko Manufacturing Co. ..................................................................
Bowne of Chicago, Inc., dba Bowne of Minneapolis, Leased
Workers Randstad Staffing Services, etc.
Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corp., A Subsidiary of AMG ....................
DEP, Inc., DBA Edward Ferrel/Lewis Mittman, Leased Workers
from Graham Personelle.
HSBC Finance Corporation, HSBC North America Holdings, Inc.
United Auto Workers Local 2244 ....................................................
Buehler Motor, Inc., Buhler Motor GMBH, Leased Workers From
Manpower.
New Page Corporation, Kimberly Mill .............................................
Impact date
Owego, NY.
Endicott, NY.
Endicott, NY.
Apalachin, NY.
Owego, NY.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
TA–W No.
72,249
72,359
72,515
72,917
73,005
73,154
73,156
73,161
Integration
Integration
Integration
Integration
Integration
Location
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
49533
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
73,998 ...............
Dupont Performance Coatings, On-Site at New United Motor
Manufacturing, Inc.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
Location
Fremont, CA.
because the petitions are the subject of
ongoing investigations under petitions
TA–W No.
Subject firm
74,344 ...............
Hanes Brands, Inc ...........................................................................
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a
negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation
period applicable to the same worker
group. The duplicative petitions did not
present new information or a change in
circumstances that would result in a
reversal of the Department’s previous
73,741 ...............
73,953 ...............
Kenco ..............................................................................................
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc .........................................................
[FR Doc. 2010–20039 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
Impact date
Winston Salem, NC.
Subject firm
Dated: August 4, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance .
filed earlier covering the same
petitioners.
Location
TA–W No.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of July 26,
2010 through July 30, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested
under the Freedom of Information Act.
Requests may be submitted by fax,
courier services, or mail to FOIA
Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or
tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
Impact date
negative determination, and therefore,
further investigation would duplicate
efforts and serve no purpose.
Location
Impact date
Lexington, KY.
Woburn, MA.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Certifications
of Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221(a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than August 23, 2010.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, at the address
shown below, not later than August 23,
2010.
Copies of these petitions may be
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act. Requests may be
submitted by fax, courier services, or
mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office
of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th of
August 2010.
Michael Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
APPENDIX
TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 7/26/10 AND 7/30/10
Subject firm
(Petitioners)
Location
Tasman Hartford, LLC (Company) ........................
Evonik Cyro, LLC (Company) ................................
D–Tech USA, LLC (Workers) ................................
Prudential Financial (State/One-Stop) ...................
Williams International, LLC (State/One-Stop) ........
Philips Lighting (Company) ....................................
Faurecia Automotive Seating Group (State/OneStop).
Hartford, WI ...................
Sanford, ME ...................
Plano, TX .......................
Hartford, CT ...................
Commerce Township, MI
Union, NJ .......................
Troy, MI ..........................
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W
74430
74431
74432
74433
74434
74435
74436
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
Date of institution
07/26/10
07/26/10
07/27/10
07/27/10
07/27/10
07/28/10
07/28/10
13AUN1
Date of petition
07/22/10
07/22/10
07/23/10
07/26/10
07/16/10
07/21/10
07/06/10
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49529-49533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
July 26, 2010 through July 30, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
[[Page 49530]]
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,362..................... P.M. Kelly, Inc., Realty Ashland, ME.......... September 18, 2008.
Road.
72,653..................... Da-Tech Corporation, Ivyland, PA.......... September 24, 2008.
Leased Workers from Judge
Technical Services,
Synerfac Technical, etc.
72,905..................... Precision Mold & Warren, MI........... November 19, 2008.
Engineering, Inc..
72,996..................... Sunrise Tool and Die, Inc. Henderson, KY........ November 20, 2008.
73,040..................... Thyssenkrupp Presta Ladson, SC........... December 1, 2008.
Steering Group.
73,469..................... Charles D. Owen Mfg. Co. Swannanoa, NC........ February 2, 2009.
Inc., Springs Global
U.S., Inc..
73,557..................... Narriot Industries, LLC... Boykins, VA.......... February 22, 2009.
73,769..................... Flexsteel Industries, Dubuque, IA.......... February 12, 2010.
Inc., Leased Workers from
Sedona Staffing.
73,771..................... Technicolor Video Cassette Detroit, MI.......... March 1, 2009.
of Michigan, Thomson,
Home Entertainment
Services, Leased Workers
Select Staffing, etc.
73,964..................... Prestolite Wire Paragould, AR........ April 14, 2009.
Corporation, Leased
Workers from Express
Services and Staffmark.
74,081..................... General Motors Vehicle Shreveport, LA....... August 28, 2010.
Manufacturing, General
Motors Corp., Leased
Workers Aerotek and Kelly
Services.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,377..................... Match.Com, Workers Whose Jacksonville, NC..... September 21, 2008.
Wages are Reported Under
PRC.
72,408..................... Capmark Capital, Inc., Granville, OH........ September 24, 2008.
Capmark Financial Group,
Debtor in Possession,
Leased Workers Spherion
and ACS.
72,716..................... Freeport-McMoran Safford, Safford, AZ.......... October 21, 2008.
Inc., Including All
Reclamation Group
Employees.
72,829..................... Circuit Services Bellevue, WA......... November 9, 2008.
Worldwide, Subsidiary of
Pan-Co International
Company, Ltd.
73,248..................... Ellcon National, Machine Greenville, SC....... January 10, 2009.
Shop In Plant One,
Faverly Transport, Leased
On-Site Workers Aerotek.
73,271..................... Dakota Imaging............ El Paso, TX.......... January 12, 2009.
73,376..................... Wacker Neuson Corporation, Menomonee Falls, WI.. January 27, 2009.
Wacher Neuson SE.
73,379..................... Bombardier Transportation, Plattsburgh, NY...... January 26, 2009.
Bombardier Mass Transit,
Leased Workers form
Eastern Technical
Services.
73,491..................... Farley's & Sathers Candy Chattanooga, TN...... February 4, 2009.
Company, Inc., Leased
Workers from Select
Staffing.
73,493..................... MEMC Electronic Materials, Sherman, TX.......... February 5, 2009.
Inc., Southwest, Leased
Workers from Kelly
Services.
73,652..................... Robert Bosch, LLC, Leased Plymouth, MI......... February 10, 2009.
Workers from Aerotek,
Cucor U.S., etc.
73,652A.................... Robert Bosch, LLC, Leased Farmington Hills, MI. February 10, 2009.
Workers from Aerotek,
Cucor U.S., etc.
73,679..................... Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ..... February 18, 2009.
Finance Division.
73,768..................... Local Insight Media, Inc., Englewood, CO........ March 22, 2009.
Corporate Services
Division.
[[Page 49531]]
73,824..................... Honeywell International, Rock Island, IL...... March 29, 2009.
Inc., Automation and
Control Solutions
Division.
73,870..................... Amphenol TCS.............. Milpitas, CA......... April 6, 2009.
73,872..................... Goodrich Corporation, Cleveland, OH........ March 18, 2009.
Landing Gear Division.
73,914..................... Damco USA, Inc., Finance Madison, NJ.......... April 13, 2009.
Division.
74,033..................... SuperMedia, Inc., Formerly St. Petersburg, FL... May 2, 2009.
Idearc Media LLC,
Publishing Operations
Group.
74,051..................... Bowne Technology Piscataway, NJ....... May 5, 2009.
Enterprise, LLC, Bowne
and Company, Inc., Help
Desk Division.
74,105..................... Liz Claiborne, Inc., North Bergen, NJ..... May 12, 2009.
Corporate Manufacturing
Department.
74,144..................... Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., Nutley, NJ........... May 11, 2009.
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing, Technical
Operations and Quality
Management.
74,178..................... Microsemi Corp. Lawrence, MA......... May 19, 2009.
Massachusetts, Testing
Services.
74,266..................... Prudential Insurance Moosic, PA........... June 17, 2009.
Company of America,
Prudential Retirement.
74,266A.................... Prudential Insurance Dubuque, IA.......... June 17, 2009.
Company of America,
Prudential Retirement.
74,283..................... Highland Lakes Software, Austin, TX........... June 15, 2009.
Inc..
74,287..................... National Sales Company, Sterling, IL......... June 21, 2009.
Stanley Black and Decker,
Leased Workers of Lumea
Staffing.
74,288..................... National Manufacturing Rock Falls, IL....... June 21, 2009.
Company, Stanley Black &
Decker, Stanley National
Hardware, Leased Workers
Lumea Staff.
74,298..................... The Travelers Indemnity Hartford, CT......... June 22, 2009.
Company, Travelers
Companies, Workers'
Compensation Statistical
Reporting.
74,306..................... HAVI Logistics, North Livonia, MI.......... June 25, 2009.
America, Havi Group, LP.
74,313..................... Becton, Dickinson, and Oceanside, CA........ June 8, 2009.
Company, BD Medical;
Sharps Disposal Systems,
Leased Workers The
Eastridge Group, etc.
74,322..................... PerTronix, Inc............ Rancho Dominguez, CA. June 25, 2009.
74,332..................... Andrew Wireless Solution, Newton, NC........... June 29, 2009.
CommScope, Leased Workers
Manpower and Griffith
Security.
74,420..................... Frank Russell Company, Tacoma, WA........... July 21, 2009.
Administrative Service
Center.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,850..................... Kasto, Inc., Keuro Besitz Export, PA........... November 13, 2008.
GMBH & Co, Leased Workers
of Industrial Employees,
etc.
73,348..................... Hayes Enterprises, Inc.... Potomac, MT.......... January 18, 2009.
73,910..................... Cranberry Lumber Company.. Beckley, WV.......... April 14, 2009.
74,026..................... Form Tech Fraser.......... Fraser, MI........... April 8, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,222..................... YRC, Inc., YRC Worldwide, Richfield, OH........ September 3, 2008.
Inc..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,901..................... Sequel Software, Inc...... Durango, CO..........
73,939..................... C3I, Inc., Leased Workers Wilkes-Barre, PA.....
from Manpower and Express.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.
[[Page 49532]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,270..................... Lockheed Martin Systems Owego, NY............
Integration.
74,270A.................... Lockheed Martin Systems Endicott, NY.........
Integration.
74,270B.................... Lockheed Martin Systems Endicott, NY.........
Integration.
74,270C.................... Lockheed Martin Systems Apalachin, NY........
Integration.
74,270D.................... Lockheed Martin Systems Owego, NY............
Integration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,249..................... CJ's Wholesale Socks, Inc. Fort Payne, AL.
72,359..................... Nielsen Hardware, Actuant Berlin, CT.
Corporation.
72,515..................... Precision Custom Coatings. Totowa, NJ.
72,917..................... Circuit City, Inc., Bethlehem, PA.
Bethlehem Distribution
Center.
73,005..................... Camcar Aerospace.......... Rockford, IL.
73,154..................... Transcom Enhanced Fort Worth, TX.
Services, Inc..
73,156..................... American Spring Wire Corp. Kankakee, IL.
73,161..................... Oglebay Norton Industrial Brady, TX.
Sands, Inc., D/B/A
Carmeuse Industrial Sands.
73,212..................... Ryko Manufacturing Co..... Grimes, IA.
73,285..................... Bowne of Chicago, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.
dba Bowne of Minneapolis,
Leased Workers Randstad
Staffing Services, etc.
73,301..................... Shieldalloy Metallurgical Newfield, NJ.
Corp., A Subsidiary of
AMG.
73,401..................... DEP, Inc., DBA Edward High Point, NC.
Ferrel/Lewis Mittman,
Leased Workers from
Graham Personelle.
73,841..................... HSBC Finance Corporation, Dayton, OH.
HSBC North America
Holdings, Inc..
73,894..................... United Auto Workers Local Fremont, CA.
2244.
74,334..................... Buehler Motor, Inc., Morrisville, NC.
Buhler Motor GMBH, Leased
Workers From Manpower.
74,415..................... New Page Corporation, Kimberly, WI.
Kimberly Mill.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of services from a foreign
country) of section 222 have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,029..................... Mohican Juvenile Perrysville, OH.
Correctional Facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,537..................... McQuay International...... Verona, VA. ................................
72,645..................... Enterprise Tool and Die... Grandville, MI. ................................
73,886..................... Burton Snowboards, Inc.... South Burlington, VT. ................................
74,043..................... American Superconductor West Mifflin, PA. ................................
Corporation.
74,083..................... Siemens................... Ballefontaine, OH. ................................
74,190..................... Dyrsmith, LLC, DBA Auburn, CA. ................................
Precision-works
Manufacturing.
74,360..................... CR Compressors, LLC....... Decatur, AL. ................................
74,361..................... CR Compressors, LLC....... Hartselle, AL. ................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
[[Page 49533]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,998..................... Dupont Performance Fremont, CA. ................................
Coatings, On-Site at New
United Motor
Manufacturing, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
74,344..................... Hanes Brands, Inc......... Winston Salem, NC. ................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same
worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information
or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the
Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further
investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,741..................... Kenco..................... Lexington, KY. ................................
73,953..................... Freescale Semiconductor, Woburn, MA. ................................
Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of July 26, 2010 through July 30, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under
the searchable listing of determinations.
Dated: August 4, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance .
[FR Doc. 2010-20039 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P