Woodland Mills Corporation, Mill Spring, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 49524-49525 [2010-20033]

Download as PDF emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 49524 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of the respondents, including Vizio and AmTran, or any of their affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities, or any of their successors or assigns; and (2) cease and desist orders directed to several respondents, including Vizio. On August 14, 2009, Funai filed a complaint, asserting that certain respondents, including and Suzhou Raken Technology, Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’), have violated the Commission’s limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders and seeking enforcement under Commission Rule 210.75 (19 CFR 210.75) and temporary emergency action under Commission Rule 210.77 (19 CFR 210.77). Suzhou is a joint venture company established in September 2009 by AmTran and LG Display Co., Ltd. Funai included Suzhou in its enforcement complaint pursuant to the provisions in the limited exclusion order that cover ‘‘affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities’’ and the provisions in the Cease and Desist orders that applies to ‘‘controlled (whether by stock ownership or otherwise) and majority owned business entities engaging in [prohibited conduct], for, with, or otherwise on behalf of’’ a named Respondent. Funai accused Suzhou of selling infringing digital televisions sold under at least the brand names Vizio® and Gallevia® in China and then importing them into the United States. On May 25, 2010, Funai and Vizio, AmTran, and Suzhou (collectively ‘‘the Vizio Respondents’’) filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation and the enforcement proceeding as to the Vizio Respondents based on a settlement agreement. On May 28, 2010, the ALJ issued an ID granting the joint motion. On June 18, 2010, the Commission determined not to review the ID. On June 29, 2010, Funai and the Vizio Respondents filed a joint motion for rescission of the remedial orders against Vizio and AmTran pursuant to the settlement agreement. On July 7, 2010, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Commission has determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of Commission Rule 210.76 (a)(1) (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)) that there be changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders previously issued in this investigation with respect to Vizio and AmTran. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Aug 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.76(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 9, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–19982 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–709] In the Matter of Certain Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products Containing Same Including Televisions, Media Players, and Cameras; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting a motion filed by complainant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (‘‘Freescale’’) for leave to amend its complaint and the notice of investigation. SUMMARY: Paul M. Bartkowski, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 2, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Freescale Semiconductor of Austin, Texas (‘‘Freescale’’). 75 FR 16837–38. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuits, chipsets, and products containing same including televisions, media players, and cameras by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,467,455; 5,715,014; and 7,199,306 (‘‘the ‘306 patent’’). The Commission’s notice of investigation named numerous respondents (‘‘Respondents’’). The ALJ issued the subject ID on July 8, 2010, granting a motion filed by complainant Freescale for leave to amend its complaint to (1) correct ‘‘clear typographical errors’’; (2) replace one respondent whose counsel has represented that it does not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation any accused products; and (3) add a dependent claim of the ‘306 patent to the investigation. Respondents filed a petition for review of the ID. Freescale and the Commission investigative attorney filed responses in opposition to Respondents’ petition. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: August 9, 2010. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–19984 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–73,695] Woodland Mills Corporation, Mill Spring, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated July 22, 2010, petitioners requested administrative E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM 13AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on June 24, 2010. The Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 39049). Workers are engaged in employment related to the production of spun yarn. The initial determination was based on the findings that worker separations are not attributable to increased imports or a shift/acquisition by the workers’ firm to a foreign country. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information pertaining to subject firm operations and an alleged shift in production abroad. The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–20033 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–72,781] emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES World Color (USA), LLC Formerly Known as Quebecor World World Color Covington Including On-Site Leased Workers From Randstad Temporary Agency and IH Services; Covington, TN; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 14, 2010, applicable to workers of World Color (USA), LLC, formerly known as Quebecor World, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Aug 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 World Color Covington, Dyersburg Facility, including on-site leased workers from Randstad Temporary Agency, Covington, Tennessee. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 5, 2010 (75 FR 30067). At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of magazines. The company reports that workers leased from IH Services were employed on-site at the Covington, Tennessee, location of World Color (USA), LLC, formerly known as Quebecor World, World Color Covington. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from IH Services working on-site at the Covington, Tennessee, location of World Color (USA), LLC, formerly known as Quebecor World, World Color Covington. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers employed at World Color (USA), LLC, formerly known as Quebecor World, World Color Covington who were adversely affected by a shift in production of magazines to Columbia and Canada. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–72,781 is hereby issued as follows: ‘‘All workers of World Color (USA), LLC, Formerly known as Quebecor World, World Color Covington, including on-site leased workers Randstad Temporary Agency and IH Services, Covington, Tennessee, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 4, 2008, through May 14, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.’’ Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of July 2010. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–20030 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 49525 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–70,724] Komatsu Reman Division of Komatsu America Corporation a Subsidiary of Komatsu Limited Including On-Site Leased Workers From KENCO; Lexington, KY; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 30, 2009, applicable to workers of Komatsu Reman, a division of Komatsu America Corporation, a subsidiary of Komatsu Limited, Lexington, Kentucky. The notice was published in the Federal Register on September 22, 2009 (74 FR 48303). At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of remanufactured mining and construction equipment component parts. The company reports that workers leased from Kenco were employed onsite at the Lexington, Kentucky, location of Komatsu Reman, a division of Komatsu America Corporation, a subsidiary of Komatsu Limited. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Kenco working on-site at the Lexington, Kentucky location of the firm. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–70,724 is hereby issued as follows: ‘‘All workers of Komatsu Reman, a division of Komatsu America Corporation, a subsidiary of Komatsu Limited, including onsite leased workers from Kenco, Lexington, Kentucky, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 18, 2008, through July 30, 2011, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.’’ E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM 13AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49524-49525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,695]


Woodland Mills Corporation, Mill Spring, NC; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated July 22, 2010, petitioners requested 
administrative

[[Page 49525]]

reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' 
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable 
to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination 
was issued on June 24, 2010. The Notice of Determination was published 
in the Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 39049).
    Workers are engaged in employment related to the production of spun 
yarn. The initial determination was based on the findings that worker 
separations are not attributable to increased imports or a shift/
acquisition by the workers' firm to a foreign country.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information pertaining to subject firm operations and an 
alleged shift in production abroad.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of August 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-20033 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P