Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc., New Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 49535 [2010-20031]
Download as PDF
49535
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices
TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 7/19/10 AND 7/23/10—Continued
Subject firm
(Petitioners)
Location
DataDirect Technologies (Company) .....................
Avaya (Wkrs) ..........................................................
Convergys (Wkrs) ..................................................
McGuire Furniture Company (Wkrs) ......................
PricewaterhouseCoopers (Workers) ......................
New Page Corporation (Company) ........................
Ainak (Company) ...................................................
Good Harbor Fillet (State/One-Stop) .....................
Husqvarna Outdoor Products (Workers) ...............
Huntington Foam LLC (Workers) ...........................
Russell Investments (Workers) ..............................
Fairfield Chair Company (Company) .....................
World Color (USA), LLC (Company) .....................
Kennametal/Extrude Hone (Workers) ....................
Unisource Worldwide, Inc. (Company) ..................
Douglas Corporation (State/One-Stop) ..................
International Business Machines (State/One-Stop)
Mattel, Inc. (Workers) .............................................
MH Technologies, LLC (Company) .......................
Tyden Brooks Security Products Group (Workers)
Norfolk, VA .....................
Basking Ridge, NJ .........
Albuquerque, NM ...........
San Francisco, CA .........
Cleveland, OH ...............
Kimberly, WI ..................
Winchester, KY ..............
Gloucester, MA ..............
Texarkana, TX ...............
Brockway, PA ................
Tacoma, WA ..................
Lenoir, NC ......................
Dyersburg, TN ...............
Irwin, PA ........................
Wisconsin Rapids, WI ....
Eden Prairie, MN ...........
Rochester, MN ...............
El Sequndo, CA .............
Mount Holly Springs, PA
Livingston, NJ ................
TA–W
74410
74411
74412
74413
74414
74415
74416
74417
74418
74419
74420
74421
74422
74423
74424
74425
74426
74427
74428
74429
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
[FR Doc. 2010–20037 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,908]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph
Company LLC, a Wholly Owned
Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a
Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc., New
Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice
of Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated July 14, 2010,
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on June
16, 2010. The Department’s Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR
38142). The petition alleges that a
merger of the subject firm with another
firm led to duplication of services (call
center support services for landline
telephone, Internet, and related data
communications) and, thus, the closure
of the subject facility.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:35 Aug 12, 2010
Jkt 220001
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination was based
on the findings that the subject firm did
not shift to/acquire from a foreign
country services like or directly
competitive with the call center support
activities provided by the subject
workers, nor did the workers supply a
service that was used in the production
of an article or the supply of a service
by a firm whose workers are currently
eligible to apply for TAA on the basis
of that article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner paraphrased the findings as
presented in the negative determination
and agreed that ‘‘[T]here was no shift in
work to a foreign country nor was
Embarq [parent company of the subject
firm] acquired by a foreign country.’’
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of institution
Date of petition
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/20/10
07/21/10
07/21/10
07/21/10
07/21/10
07/22/10
07/22/10
07/22/10
07/23/10
07/23/10
07/23/10
07/23/10
07/23/10
07/23/10
07/12/10
07/08/10
06/29/10
07/08/10
07/13/10
07/19/10
07/12/10
07/19/10
06/30/10
07/14/10
07/21/10
07/19/10
07/16/10
07/15/10
07/21/10
07/22/10
07/22/10
07/20/10
05/19/10
07/01/10
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–20031 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–73,840]
Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep; Detroit, MI;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated July 6, 2010, the
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was signed on June
17, 2010. The Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not
previously considered that the determination
complained of was erroneous;
E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM
13AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 49535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20031]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,908]
Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, a Wholly Owned
Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc.,
New Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated July 14, 2010, petitioners requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The determination was issued on June 16, 2010. The
Department's Notice of determination was published in the Federal
Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142). The petition alleges that a
merger of the subject firm with another firm led to duplication of
services (call center support services for landline telephone,
Internet, and related data communications) and, thus, the closure of
the subject facility.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative determination was based on the findings that the
subject firm did not shift to/acquire from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with the call center support activities
provided by the subject workers, nor did the workers supply a service
that was used in the production of an article or the supply of a
service by a firm whose workers are currently eligible to apply for TAA
on the basis of that article or service.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner paraphrased the
findings as presented in the negative determination and agreed that
``[T]here was no shift in work to a foreign country nor was Embarq
[parent company of the subject firm] acquired by a foreign country.''
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-20031 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P