Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc., New Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 49535 [2010-20031]

Download as PDF 49535 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 7/19/10 AND 7/23/10—Continued Subject firm (Petitioners) Location DataDirect Technologies (Company) ..................... Avaya (Wkrs) .......................................................... Convergys (Wkrs) .................................................. McGuire Furniture Company (Wkrs) ...................... PricewaterhouseCoopers (Workers) ...................... New Page Corporation (Company) ........................ Ainak (Company) ................................................... Good Harbor Fillet (State/One-Stop) ..................... Husqvarna Outdoor Products (Workers) ............... Huntington Foam LLC (Workers) ........................... Russell Investments (Workers) .............................. Fairfield Chair Company (Company) ..................... World Color (USA), LLC (Company) ..................... Kennametal/Extrude Hone (Workers) .................... Unisource Worldwide, Inc. (Company) .................. Douglas Corporation (State/One-Stop) .................. International Business Machines (State/One-Stop) Mattel, Inc. (Workers) ............................................. MH Technologies, LLC (Company) ....................... Tyden Brooks Security Products Group (Workers) Norfolk, VA ..................... Basking Ridge, NJ ......... Albuquerque, NM ........... San Francisco, CA ......... Cleveland, OH ............... Kimberly, WI .................. Winchester, KY .............. Gloucester, MA .............. Texarkana, TX ............... Brockway, PA ................ Tacoma, WA .................. Lenoir, NC ...................... Dyersburg, TN ............... Irwin, PA ........................ Wisconsin Rapids, WI .... Eden Prairie, MN ........... Rochester, MN ............... El Sequndo, CA ............. Mount Holly Springs, PA Livingston, NJ ................ TA–W 74410 74411 74412 74413 74414 74415 74416 74417 74418 74419 74420 74421 74422 74423 74424 74425 74426 74427 74428 74429 .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. .............................. [FR Doc. 2010–20037 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–72,908] emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc., New Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated July 14, 2010, petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on June 16, 2010. The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142). The petition alleges that a merger of the subject firm with another firm led to duplication of services (call center support services for landline telephone, Internet, and related data communications) and, thus, the closure of the subject facility. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Aug 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The negative determination was based on the findings that the subject firm did not shift to/acquire from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with the call center support activities provided by the subject workers, nor did the workers supply a service that was used in the production of an article or the supply of a service by a firm whose workers are currently eligible to apply for TAA on the basis of that article or service. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner paraphrased the findings as presented in the negative determination and agreed that ‘‘[T]here was no shift in work to a foreign country nor was Embarq [parent company of the subject firm] acquired by a foreign country.’’ The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2) a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration of the initial determination. After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution Date of petition 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/20/10 07/21/10 07/21/10 07/21/10 07/21/10 07/22/10 07/22/10 07/22/10 07/23/10 07/23/10 07/23/10 07/23/10 07/23/10 07/23/10 07/12/10 07/08/10 06/29/10 07/08/10 07/13/10 07/19/10 07/12/10 07/19/10 06/30/10 07/14/10 07/21/10 07/19/10 07/16/10 07/15/10 07/21/10 07/22/10 07/22/10 07/20/10 05/19/10 07/01/10 there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–20031 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–73,840] Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep; Detroit, MI; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated July 6, 2010, the petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was signed on June 17, 2010. The Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM 13AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 49535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-20031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,908]


Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, a Wholly Owned 
Subsidiary of Embarq Corporation, a Subsidiary of Centurylink, Inc., 
New Bern Call Center, New Bern, NC; Notice of Negative Determination 
Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated July 14, 2010, petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the 
subject firm. The determination was issued on June 16, 2010. The 
Department's Notice of determination was published in the Federal 
Register on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142). The petition alleges that a 
merger of the subject firm with another firm led to duplication of 
services (call center support services for landline telephone, 
Internet, and related data communications) and, thus, the closure of 
the subject facility.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the 
decision.
    The negative determination was based on the findings that the 
subject firm did not shift to/acquire from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with the call center support activities 
provided by the subject workers, nor did the workers supply a service 
that was used in the production of an article or the supply of a 
service by a firm whose workers are currently eligible to apply for TAA 
on the basis of that article or service.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner paraphrased the 
findings as presented in the negative determination and agreed that 
``[T]here was no shift in work to a foreign country nor was Embarq 
[parent company of the subject firm] acquired by a foreign country.''
    The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor 
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a 
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2) 
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration 
of the initial determination.
    After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the 
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-20031 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P