In the Matter of Certain Digital Television Products and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order Against Certain Respondents, 49523-49524 [2010-19982]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Lancaster County Park Hill, 1913 S 41St. St., Lincoln, 10000628 Sheridan County Spade Ranch Store, W Side of SHWY 27/Lot 5 of Ellsworth, Ellsworth, 10000629 NORTH CAROLINA Cleveland County WeSt. End Historic District, Bounded by W Mountain St., W Gold St., S Cansler St., S Tracy St., S Watterson St., and S Goforth St., Kings Mountain, 10000630 Durham County Burch Avenue Historic District, (Durham MRA) Roughly bounded by S Buchanan Blvd, W Chapel Hill St., Duke University Rd, Burch Ave, and Rome Ave, Durham, 10000631 Wake County Madonna Acres Historic District, (Post.World War II and Modern Architecture in Raleigh, North Carolina, 1945–1965) Delany Dr, Dillon, Summerville, and Tierney Circles, Raleigh, 10000632 OKLAHOMA Cherokee County American Baptist Home Mission House, 530 Summit St., Tahlequah, 10000621 Grant County Pond Creek Masonic Lodge #125, 126 Broadway Ave, Pond Creek, 10000622 Kay County National Park Service National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Removal of Listed Property Pursuant to § 60.15 of 36 CFR part 60. Comments are being accepted on the following properties being considered for removal from the National Register of Historic Places. Comments may be forwarded by United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written or faxed comments should be submitted by August 30, 2010. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Wentz Camp, Intersection of L.A. Cann Dr and E. Prospect Ave., Ponca City, 10000620 J. Paul Loether, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program. Latimer County Request for removal has been made for the following resource: Administration Building, 831 SE 172 Rd, Wilburton, 10000626 MISSOURI Major County First United Methodist Church, 118 N 7th, Fairview, 10000624 St. Louis [Independent City] Medart’s, 7036 Clayton Ave., St. Louis, 09000410 Nowata County [FR Doc. 2010–20091 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] Moore Ranch, 6 mi W of Nowata on N4070 Rd, Oklahoma, 10000617 BILLING CODE P Payne County White Cloud Lodge, 820 E 146th, Perkins, 10000619 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Pottawatomie County Squirrel Creek Bridge, Carries Rangeline Rd over Squirrel Creek, Shawnee, 10000625 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Tulsa County Brady Historic District, Roughly along E/W Cameron and E/W Archer, from N Boulder to N Detroit, Tulsa, 10000618 Morrow Home Place, 13200 E 126th St. N, Collinsville, 10000627 Woods County Nickel Ensor McClure House, 1301 Locust, Alva, 10000623 [FR Doc. 2010–20088 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Aug 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 [Investigation No. 337–TA–617] In the Matter of Certain Digital Television Products and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same; Notice of Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Order Against Certain Respondents U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 49523 Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to rescind a limited exclusion order and cease and desist order issued in the abovecaptioned investigation with respect to Vizio, Inc.(‘‘Vizio’’) and AmTran Technology Co., Ltd.(‘‘AmTran’’). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on November 15, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Funai Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan and Funai Corporation of Rutherford, New Jersey (collectively ‘‘Funai’’) against several respondents including Vizio and AmTran. 72 FR 64240 (2007). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital television products and certain products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,115,074 (‘‘the ‘074 patent’’) and 5,329,369 (‘‘the ‘369 patent’’). On April 10, 2009, the Commission terminated this investigation with a finding of violation of Section 337 by reason of infringement of claims 1, 5, and 23 of the ‘074 patent. 74 FR 17511 (2009). The Commission determined that the appropriate form of relief is (1) a limited exclusion order under 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1) prohibiting the unlicensed entry of certain digital television products and certain products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, and 23 of the ‘074 patent, and are manufactured abroad by SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM 13AUN1 emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES 49524 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 156 / Friday, August 13, 2010 / Notices or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of the respondents, including Vizio and AmTran, or any of their affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities, or any of their successors or assigns; and (2) cease and desist orders directed to several respondents, including Vizio. On August 14, 2009, Funai filed a complaint, asserting that certain respondents, including and Suzhou Raken Technology, Ltd. (‘‘Suzhou’’), have violated the Commission’s limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders and seeking enforcement under Commission Rule 210.75 (19 CFR 210.75) and temporary emergency action under Commission Rule 210.77 (19 CFR 210.77). Suzhou is a joint venture company established in September 2009 by AmTran and LG Display Co., Ltd. Funai included Suzhou in its enforcement complaint pursuant to the provisions in the limited exclusion order that cover ‘‘affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities’’ and the provisions in the Cease and Desist orders that applies to ‘‘controlled (whether by stock ownership or otherwise) and majority owned business entities engaging in [prohibited conduct], for, with, or otherwise on behalf of’’ a named Respondent. Funai accused Suzhou of selling infringing digital televisions sold under at least the brand names Vizio® and Gallevia® in China and then importing them into the United States. On May 25, 2010, Funai and Vizio, AmTran, and Suzhou (collectively ‘‘the Vizio Respondents’’) filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation and the enforcement proceeding as to the Vizio Respondents based on a settlement agreement. On May 28, 2010, the ALJ issued an ID granting the joint motion. On June 18, 2010, the Commission determined not to review the ID. On June 29, 2010, Funai and the Vizio Respondents filed a joint motion for rescission of the remedial orders against Vizio and AmTran pursuant to the settlement agreement. On July 7, 2010, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions, the Commission has determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of Commission Rule 210.76 (a)(1) (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)) that there be changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders previously issued in this investigation with respect to Vizio and AmTran. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:35 Aug 12, 2010 Jkt 220001 The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.76(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 9, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–19982 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–709] In the Matter of Certain Integrated Circuits, Chipsets, and Products Containing Same Including Televisions, Media Players, and Cameras; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting a motion filed by complainant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (‘‘Freescale’’) for leave to amend its complaint and the notice of investigation. SUMMARY: Paul M. Bartkowski, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on April 2, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Freescale Semiconductor of Austin, Texas (‘‘Freescale’’). 75 FR 16837–38. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain integrated circuits, chipsets, and products containing same including televisions, media players, and cameras by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,467,455; 5,715,014; and 7,199,306 (‘‘the ‘306 patent’’). The Commission’s notice of investigation named numerous respondents (‘‘Respondents’’). The ALJ issued the subject ID on July 8, 2010, granting a motion filed by complainant Freescale for leave to amend its complaint to (1) correct ‘‘clear typographical errors’’; (2) replace one respondent whose counsel has represented that it does not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation any accused products; and (3) add a dependent claim of the ‘306 patent to the investigation. Respondents filed a petition for review of the ID. Freescale and the Commission investigative attorney filed responses in opposition to Respondents’ petition. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: August 9, 2010. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–19984 Filed 8–12–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–73,695] Woodland Mills Corporation, Mill Spring, NC; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated July 22, 2010, petitioners requested administrative E:\FR\FM\13AUN1.SGM 13AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49523-49524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19982]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-617]


In the Matter of Certain Digital Television Products and Certain 
Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same; Notice of 
Commission Determination To Rescind a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease 
and Desist Order Against Certain Respondents

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to rescind a limited exclusion order and 
cease and desist order issued in the above-captioned investigation with 
respect to Vizio, Inc.(``Vizio'') and AmTran Technology Co., 
Ltd.(``AmTran'').

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 15, 2007, based on a complaint filed by Funai Electric Co., 
Ltd. of Japan and Funai Corporation of Rutherford, New Jersey 
(collectively ``Funai'') against several respondents including Vizio 
and AmTran. 72 FR 64240 (2007). The complaint alleged violations of 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in 
the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and 
the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital 
television products and certain products containing same by reason of 
infringement of one or more claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,115,074 (``the 
`074 patent'') and 5,329,369 (``the `369 patent'').
    On April 10, 2009, the Commission terminated this investigation 
with a finding of violation of Section 337 by reason of infringement of 
claims 1, 5, and 23 of the `074 patent. 74 FR 17511 (2009). The 
Commission determined that the appropriate form of relief is (1) a 
limited exclusion order under 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1) prohibiting the 
unlicensed entry of certain digital television products and certain 
products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 
and 23 of the `074 patent, and are manufactured abroad by

[[Page 49524]]

or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of the respondents, 
including Vizio and AmTran, or any of their affiliated companies, 
parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities, or any of 
their successors or assigns; and (2) cease and desist orders directed 
to several respondents, including Vizio.
    On August 14, 2009, Funai filed a complaint, asserting that certain 
respondents, including and Suzhou Raken Technology, Ltd. (``Suzhou''), 
have violated the Commission's limited exclusion order and cease and 
desist orders and seeking enforcement under Commission Rule 210.75 (19 
CFR 210.75) and temporary emergency action under Commission Rule 210.77 
(19 CFR 210.77). Suzhou is a joint venture company established in 
September 2009 by AmTran and LG Display Co., Ltd. Funai included Suzhou 
in its enforcement complaint pursuant to the provisions in the limited 
exclusion order that cover ``affiliated companies, parents, 
subsidiaries, or other related business entities'' and the provisions 
in the Cease and Desist orders that applies to ``controlled (whether by 
stock ownership or otherwise) and majority owned business entities 
engaging in [prohibited conduct], for, with, or otherwise on behalf 
of'' a named Respondent. Funai accused Suzhou of selling infringing 
digital televisions sold under at least the brand names Vizio[supreg] 
and Gallevia[supreg] in China and then importing them into the United 
States.
    On May 25, 2010, Funai and Vizio, AmTran, and Suzhou (collectively 
``the Vizio Respondents'') filed a joint motion to terminate the 
investigation and the enforcement proceeding as to the Vizio 
Respondents based on a settlement agreement. On May 28, 2010, the ALJ 
issued an ID granting the joint motion. On June 18, 2010, the 
Commission determined not to review the ID.
    On June 29, 2010, Funai and the Vizio Respondents filed a joint 
motion for rescission of the remedial orders against Vizio and AmTran 
pursuant to the settlement agreement. On July 7, 2010, the Commission 
investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion.
    Having reviewed the parties' submissions, the Commission has 
determined that the settlement agreement satisfies the requirement of 
Commission Rule 210.76 (a)(1) (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)) that there be 
changed conditions of fact or law. The Commission therefore has issued 
an order rescinding the limited exclusion order and cease and desist 
orders previously issued in this investigation with respect to Vizio 
and AmTran.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.76(a)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.76(a)(1)).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 9, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-19982 Filed 8-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P