Amendments to the Informal and Other Procedures, Rules of Organization and Program Management, and Rules of Practice; Interim Commission Review of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Inspection Reports and Regulation P, 47444-47451 [2010-18860]
Download as PDF
47444
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(4) Commencement of cases
(§ 134.202(d) only, on deadlines and
how to count days);
(5) Filing and service requirements
(§ 134.204);
(6) Amendments and supplemental
pleadings (§ 134.207);
(7) Requirement of signature
(§ 134.209);
(8) Motions (§ 134.211);
(9) Summary decision (§ 134.212);
(10) Sanctions (§ 134.219); and
(11) Review of initial decisions
(§ 134.228).
§ 134.802
[Reserved]
§ 134.803 Commencement of appeals from
AMO decisions.
(a) An appeal from an AMO decision
must be commenced by filing an appeal
petition within 15 days from the date
the Employee receives the AMO’s
decision.
(b) If the AMO does not issue a
decision, the appeal petition must be
filed no sooner than 16 days and no
later than 55 days from the date on
which the Employee filed the original
Statement of Dispute with the AMO.
(c) The rule for counting days is in
§ 134.202(d).
(d) OHA will dismiss an untimely
appeal.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 134.804
The appeal petition.
(a) Form. There is no required format
for an appeal petition. However, it must
include the following:
(1) A copy of the original Statement
of Dispute;
(2) A copy of the AMO’s decision or
other response, if any;
(3) Statement of why the AMO’s
decision is alleged to be in error;
(4) Any other pertinent information
the OHA Judge should consider;
(5) A request for mediation, if
applicable;
(6) The Employee’s name, home
mailing address, daytime telephone and
facsimile numbers, e-mail address, and
signature; and
(7) If represented by an attorney, the
attorney’s contact information and
signature.
(b) Service of the appeal petition upon
the SBA. The Employee must serve
copies of the entire appeal petition upon
three SBA officials:
(1) The AMO;
(2) Chief Human Capital Officer, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
20416; and
(3) Associate General Counsel for
General Law, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20416, e-mail:
OGLService@sba.gov, except that an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
employee of the Office of Inspector
General (OIG) must serve it upon the
Counsel to the Inspector General, U.S.
Small Business Administration, 409
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
20416, e-mail: ig.counseldiv@sba.gov.
(c) Certificate of Service. The
Employee will attach to the appeal
petition a signed certificate of service
meeting the requirements of
§ 134.204(d).
(d) The rules governing filing and
service are in § 134.204.
(e) Dismissal. An appeal petition that
does not meet all the requirements of
this section may be dismissed by the
Judge at his or her own initiative or
upon motion of the SBA.
§ 134.805
After the appeal petition is filed.
(a) The AA/OHA will assign a Judge
to adjudicate the case. If mediation is
requested or offered, the AA/OHA will
assign a different person to mediate the
case.
(b) OHA will issue and serve upon the
Employee and the SBA a notice and
order informing the parties that an
appeal has been filed, and setting the
date for SBA’s response and the close of
record.
(c) The rules for amendments to
pleadings and supplemental pleadings
are in § 134.207.
(d) Unless otherwise instructed, OHA
will serve all orders and the decision by
U.S. Mail upon the Employee at his or
her home address, or upon the attorney
if represented by an attorney.
§ 134.806
Mediation.
Either the Employee or the SBA may
request mediation, or OHA may offer
mediation. OHA may designate a Judge
or an OHA attorney to serve as a
mediator. If the parties reach a
settlement through mediation, they may
file a joint motion to dismiss the appeal
based on that settlement. If the parties
do not reach a settlement, the mediation
will conclude and the appeal will go to
adjudication. An OHA-provided
mediator will not be involved in a
subsequent adjudication.
§ 134.807
SBA response.
(a) If the appeal goes to adjudication,
SBA will file and serve the SBA’s
response to the appeal and a copy of the
Dispute File.
(b) Unless the Judge orders a different
date (either on his or her own initiative
or on motion by a party), the SBA must
file any response to the appeal petition
no later than 15 days from the
conclusion of mediation or 45 days from
the filing of the appeal petition,
whichever is later.
(c) The SBA’s response and the
Dispute File are normally the last
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submissions in an appeal, although the
Judge may order or permit additional
submissions. If a party wishes to file an
additional submission, the party must
file and serve a motion (see § 134.211)
accompanied by the proposed
submission.
§ 134.808
The decision.
(a) The Judge will decide the appeal
within 45 calendar days (if practicable)
from close of record. The decision will
affirm, modify, remand, or reverse the
AMO’s decision.
(b) The standard of review and burden
of proof will be determined by the
specific issue presented.
(c) OHA’s decision is an initial
decision which becomes the final
decision of the SBA 30 calendar days
after issuance, unless a party files a
request for review pursuant to
§ 134.809.
(d) OHA’s decision is not precedential
and it will not be published.
§ 134.809
Review of initial decision.
The Request for Review (RFR) process
is the same as in § 134.228 except that,
for OIG employees:
(a) The RFR must be served on the
Counsel to the Inspector General rather
than on the Associate General Counsel
for General Law; and
(b) The deciding official is the
Inspector General (or designee) rather
than the Administrator.
Dated: July 30, 2010.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–19401 Filed 8–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 200, 201 and 202
[Release No. 34–62575]
Amendments to the Informal and Other
Procedures, Rules of Organization and
Program Management, and Rules of
Practice; Interim Commission Review
of Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board Inspection Reports
and Regulation P
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is
amending its Informal and Other
Procedures to add a rule to facilitate
interim Commission review of Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(‘‘PCAOB’’) inspection reports under
Section 104(h) of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (the ‘‘Act’’), and its Rules of
Organization and Program Management
and Rules of Practice to delegate
authority to the Chief Accountant
related to these reviews. The
Commission is also establishing a
subpart in its Informal and Other
Procedures—Regulation P—to include
procedural rules relating to the PCAOB.
DATES: Effective Date: September 7,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Cohan (Senior Special Counsel)
or John Offenbacher (Professional
Accounting Fellow) at (202) 551–5300,
Office of the Chief Accountant,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–7561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission is amending: (1) Its
Informal and Other Procedures 1 to
establish a new subpart (‘‘Regulation
P’’),2 to establish a set of procedures to
facilitate requests by registered public
accounting firms for interim
Commission review of PCAOB
inspection reports (§ 202.140), and to
redesignate existing Rule 12 (§ 202.11)
as Rule 190 (§ 202.190); (2) its Rules of
Organization and Program
Management 3 to provide delegations of
authority to the Chief Accountant
related to these reviews (§ 200.30–11);
and (3) its Rules of Practice 4 to reflect
the new delegations of authority
(§ 201.430 and § 201.431).
I. Discussion of Rule Amendments
A. Introduction
The Act established the PCAOB to
oversee the audit of companies that are
subject to the securities laws, and
related matters, in order to protect the
interests of investors and further the
public interest in the preparation of
informative, accurate, and independent
audit reports. The PCAOB operates
under the comprehensive oversight and
enforcement authority of the
Commission.5
1 17
CFR 202 et seq.
CFR 202 subpart 100.
3 17 CFR 200 et seq.
4 17 CFR 201 et seq.
5 The Act vests the Commission with oversight
duties and responsibilities, including the duties to
appoint the members of the PCAOB, approve
PCAOB rules and professional standards for them
to take effect, act as an appellate authority for
PCAOB enforcement actions, and approve the
PCAOB’s budget and annual accounting support
fee. The Commission also, among other things, may
amend existing PCAOB rules, assign additional
tasks to the PCAOB as appropriate, oversee the
PCAOB’s exercise of certain assigned powers and
duties, and limit the PCAOB’s activities and remove
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Consistent with that oversight,
Section 104(h) of the Act provides for
the opportunity of a registered public
accounting firm to request interim
Commission review with respect to
PCAOB inspection reports. The
Commission is adopting new rules to
implement the Act’s provisions relating
to these interim review requests.
B. Background
Section 104 of the Act requires the
PCAOB to conduct a continuing
program of inspections of each
registered public accounting firm.6 That
section of the Act directs the PCAOB to
publish a written report of its findings
for each inspection.7
As required by the Act, PCAOB rules
provide that a registered public
accounting firm may review and
respond to a draft inspection report.8
However, when the PCAOB first
publishes its report, no portions of the
inspection report that deal with
criticisms of, or potential defects in, the
quality control systems of the firm
under inspection shall be made public
if those criticisms or defects are
addressed by the firm, to the satisfaction
of the PCAOB, not later than 12 months
after the date of the inspection report.9
Section 104 of the Act also provides
that a registered public accounting firm
may seek interim review by the
Commission, pursuant to such rules as
the Commission may promulgate, if the
firm either:
(1) Has responded to the substance of
particular items in the PCAOB’s draft
inspection report and disagrees with the
assessments contained in any final
report prepared by the PCAOB
following that response, or
(2) Disagrees with the PCAOB’s
determination that quality control
criticisms or defects identified in the
inspection report have not been
addressed to the satisfaction of the
PCAOB within 12 months of the date of
the inspection report.10
The Act further provides that a firm may
request any such review within 30 days
of the event that gives rise to the
review.11 We believe implicit in the
language of 104(h)(1) is that the firm
may seek review both with respect to
items to which the firm responded to
the PCAOB in connection with a draft
inspection report and disagrees with the
PCAOB members. See, e.g., Title I of the Act [15
U.S.C. 7211–7219].
6 See Section 104(a) of the Act.
7 See Section 104(g) of the Act.
8 See Section 104(f) of the Act and PCAOB Rule
4007.
9 See Section 104(g)(2) of the Act.
10 See Section 104(h)(1) of the Act.
11 See Section 104(h)(3) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47445
assessments relating to those items
contained in any final report, as well as
any assessments contained in any final
inspection report that was not contained
in the draft inspection report provided
to the firm with which the firm
disagrees (e.g., items on which the firm
did not have an opportunity to comment
in connection with the draft report).
New Rule 140, which we are adopting
today, clarifies that these are separate
reviewable matters.
To implement Section 104 of the Act
as to the PCAOB’s basic inspection
program, the Commission approved a
set of rules proposed by the PCAOB.12
These rules provide that the PCAOB
will make a draft inspection report
available for review by the firm that is
the subject of the report, and the firm
may submit a written response to the
draft report, which will become part of
the inspection report.13 A separate
PCAOB rule implements the Act’s
12-month delay of publication of any
portions of an inspection report that
deal with criticisms of, or defects in, the
inspected firm’s quality control
systems.14 During that 12-month period,
the firm that is the subject of the report
may submit evidence or otherwise
demonstrate to the PCAOB that it has
improved its quality control systems
and remedied the defects in question. If
the PCAOB determines that the firm has
addressed the quality control defects
and criticisms in the final report
satisfactorily, the portion of the report
that dealt with those defects and
criticisms will not be made public.15
On the other hand, if the inspected
firm has failed to address those defects
and criticisms to the satisfaction of the
PCAOB within the 12-month period
mandated by Sections 104(g) and (h) of
the Act, the PCAOB will take one of the
following actions:
(1) If the inspected firm failed to make
any submission to the PCAOB
concerning the firm’s efforts to address
the quality control defects or criticisms,
the PCAOB will make those portions of
the report public upon expiration of the
12-month period;
(2) If the firm made a submission to
the PCAOB concerning the firm’s efforts
to address the quality control defects or
criticisms, but did not seek timely
interim Commission review of an
adverse PCAOB determination
concerning those defects or criticisms,
12 See PCAOB Rules 4000–4010, PCAOB Release
No. 2003–19 (October 7, 2003). The rules were
approved by the Commission in Release No. 34–
49787 (June 1, 2004).
13 See PCAOB Rule 4007. See also Section 104(f)
of the Act.
14 See PCAOB Rule 4009.
15 See Section 104(g)(2) of the Act.
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
47446
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
the PCAOB will make public those
portions of the report that deal with
criticisms of or potential defects in
quality control systems that the firm has
not addressed to the satisfaction of the
Board upon expiration of a 30-day
period during which the firm may seek
Commission review; or
(3) If the inspected firm made a timely
request for interim Commission review,
the PCAOB will make public those
portions of the report that deal with
criticisms of or potential defects in
quality control systems that the firm has
not addressed to the satisfaction of the
Board 30 days after the firm formally
requested interim Commission review,
unless the Commission, by rule or order,
directs otherwise.16
C. Rule Amendments
We are adopting new Rule 140 to
provide procedures for firms to follow
in requesting interim Commission
review with respect to a PCAOB
inspection report, including examples of
the types of information that would
facilitate the Commission’s review.
Consistent with the time periods in the
Act, the rule specifies that a request for
interim Commission review must be
submitted to the Commission’s Office of
the Secretary, with a copy to the
PCAOB, within 30 days following either
the date the firm is provided a copy of
the final inspection report (with respect
to a review sought pursuant to Section
104(h)(1)(A) of the Act), or the date the
firm receives notice of the PCAOB’s
adverse determination with respect to
remediation of quality control defects or
criticisms (with respect to a review
sought pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(B)
of the Act).17
The review request should be marked
‘‘Request for Interim Commission
Review with Respect to PCAOB
Inspection Report.’’ Firms seeking
interim Commission review should
submit, along with the review request,
information that, to the extent possible,
is focused on the specific matters for
which review is requested, and that
clearly and succinctly addresses the
issues raised by the PCAOB. Generally,
we expect that this information would
include, but may not necessarily be
limited to:
• The particular inspection report
that is the subject of the request,
• The specific assessments or
determinations that are the subject of
the request,
• The alleged errors or deficiencies in
the assessments or determinations and
16 See
PCAOB Rule 4009(d).
periods for purposes of Rule 140 shall be
computed as provided in Rule 160 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice. 17 CFR 201.160.
17 Time
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
the reasons they are believed to be in
error or deficient,
• If the action relates to an adverse
determination by the PCAOB with
respect to remediation of quality control
defects or criticisms, any actions the
firm took to address criticisms or defects
identified in the inspection report,18
and
• Any supporting documentation
relevant to the review including, but not
limited to, any documents previously
submitted to the PCAOB that the firm
wishes the Commission to consider.
The rule directs the firm to provide a
copy of its review request to the PCAOB
simultaneously with its submission to
the Commission. This is consistent with
directions throughout the new rule for
the firm and the PCAOB to provide
copies of the information they submit to
the Commission to the other party
simultaneous with their submission to
the Commission to provide an
opportunity for both parties to be
informed of each other’s respective
positions.
With respect to interim reviews
contemplated by Section 104(h)(1)(A) of
the Act, PCAOB Rule 4008 is silent
regarding whether a final inspection
report would be made public before an
inspected firm has an opportunity to
review the final inspection report and
determine whether to request interim
Commission review. In order to prevent
the release of any final report before the
inspected firm has an opportunity to
seek Commission review, the new rule
provides that the PCAOB shall not make
a final inspection report publicly
available until the firm that is the
subject of the report has had 30 calendar
days in which to seek interim
Commission review, unless the firm
consents in writing to earlier
publication of the report. As noted
above, this is consistent with the
provision in PCAOB Rule 4009 that
delays publication of unresolved quality
control defects or criticisms for 30
calendar days in certain circumstances.
New Rule 140 also provides for a similar
delay of publication with respect to the
possibility of a review request pursuant
to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act.
18 A request with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(B)
is limited to situations where the firm disagrees
with a Board determination that criticisms or
defects indentified in a previously issued
inspection report have not been satisfactorily
addressed. It is not an additional opportunity to
seek review with respect to the original criticisms
or defects themselves. If a firm disagrees with an
original criticism or defect and wishes to request
Commission review, the firm should initiate that
request in accordance with Section 104(h)(1)(A)
within 30 days of when the firm is originally
provided a copy of the final inspection report.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We do not believe that matters
potentially subject to interim
Commission review should be subject to
publication, absent consent by the firm,
before the firm’s time to seek that
review has expired, and we see no
sufficient reason to vary this result
based on whether review would be
pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of the
Act or Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act.19
We understand this procedure may
require the PCAOB to adjust its
processes to account for the 30-day
period for a firm to request review
before initial publication of the final
inspection report. However, given the
standard of review articulated below
with respect to the Commission’s
processing of such reviews, as well as
the fact that the Commission may
decline to grant review requests, we do
not believe providing for an initial stay
of the publication of a final inspection
report will result in needless delays or
routine appeals simply to delay
publication.
New Rule 140 also provides that a
timely review request by a firm will
operate as an automatic stay of
publication of the portions of the final
inspection report that are the subject of
the firm’s review request (with respect
to requests pursuant to Section
104(h)(1)(A) of the Act) or the portions
of the inspection report that deal with
criticism of or potential defects in the
quality control systems of the firm that
are the subject of the firm’s review
request (with respect to requests
pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the
Act) unless the Commission determines
otherwise, in its own discretion.
At the end of the 30-day review
request period, the PCAOB shall make
publicly available any portions of the
final inspection report that are not the
subject of the firm’s review request
(with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of
the Act) or criticisms of or potential
defects in the quality control systems of
the firm that are not the subject of the
firm’s review request (with respect to
Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act), unless
the Commission otherwise determines
that such a result would not be
necessary or appropriate. This helps to
ensure timely publication of the
portions of the report that are not
19 In particular, we believe this approach is
consistent with Section 104(h) that an opportunity
for interim Commission review is meant to precede
publication. Further, we believe this approach is
consistent with Section 104(g) of the Act, which
provides that the final inspection report will be
made available to the public ‘‘subject to’’ the Section
104(h) review process, which itself is a logical
extension of the statutory requirement for the
PCAOB to provide for a procedure for review before
publication in accordance with Section 104(f) of the
Act.
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
subject to review. Further, if the firm
fails to make a timely review request,
the PCAOB shall make publicly
available the final inspection report
(with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of
the Act) or the portions of the
inspection report that deal with
criticism of or potential defects in the
quality control systems of the firm (with
respect to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the
Act).
If a timely request for interim review
with respect to an inspection report is
made, the Commission will notify the
firm and the PCAOB within 30 calendar
days of the receipt of the request as to
whether the Commission in its
discretion will grant the request for
interim review. We believe this provides
an appropriate period of time to
evaluate the initial review request while
balancing the interest in timely
publication of inspection
determinations. In considering whether
to grant a review request, among the
factors that the Commission may
consider are whether the review request
makes a reasonable showing that review
is appropriate or otherwise presents a
concern. We do not intend to routinely
grant review requests absent some
indication of concern.
If the Commission does not grant the
review request, the stay of publication is
terminated upon notification to the firm
and the PCAOB. If the Commission
notifies the firm and the PCAOB that the
request for interim review has been
granted, the stay of publication shall
continue unless the Commission
determines otherwise in its own
discretion, or unless the firm consents
in writing to the PCAOB, with a copy
to the Commission to earlier
publication.
Rule 140 provides that where the
Commission has notified the firm and
the PCAOB that it is granting the request
for an interim review, the PCAOB may
submit responsive information or
documents with the Commission, with
a copy to the firm, within 15 calendar
days of receipt of such notice. We
believe this period of time should be
reasonable given that the PCAOB
drafted the final inspection report and
considered the evidence for its decision.
The Commission also may request
additional information, and provide a
period of up to seven calendar days to
respond to such request, from the firm
in question, the PCAOB, and any
associated person of the firm. The
Commission may grant the firm or the
PCAOB a period of up to seven calendar
days to respond to any information
obtained. This period of time is selected
to balance the interest for an
opportunity to respond with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
expediency needed to complete the
review and, if applicable, have the
underlying findings or determinations
published. Likewise, if the firm or the
PCAOB fails to respond timely to a
request from the Commission, such
failure may make it impossible for the
Commission to complete its review and
therefore could result in a determination
adverse to the non-responsive party.20
The information provided by the firm,
together with any additional
information provided by the PCAOB or
associated persons, provides a basis for
Commission consideration of the
review. Rule 140 provides that, based on
this information, the Commission shall
consider whether the PCAOB’s
assessments or determinations are
arbitrary and capricious, or otherwise
not consistent with the purposes of the
Act.
Congress did not prescribe a standard
of review for PCAOB inspection reports
in the Act. Therefore, in establishing
this standard of review, the Commission
is informed by the approach that the
courts have generally taken in reviewing
agency action in the absence of a
statutorily prescribed standard of
review.21 Further, an arbitrary and
capricious standard of review creates an
incentive for the firm to fully address
and pursue areas of concern in the
inspection report with the PCAOB,
under its rules, prior to requesting
review by the Commission.
At the end of its review, the
Commission shall inform the firm
seeking review and the PCAOB in
writing that the Commission:
(1) Does not object to all or part of the
PCAOB’s assessments or determination
and the stay of publication is
terminated; or
(2) Remands to the PCAOB with
instructions that the stay of publication
is permanent or that the PCAOB take
such other actions as the Commission
deems necessary or appropriate with
respect to publication, including, but
not limited to, revising the final
inspection report or determinations
before publication.
To further encourage expediency in
the review process, the rule provides
that the review is to be completed and
20 Such failure on the part of the firm would
include the failure of an ‘‘associated person’’ of a
firm to respond.
21 See Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation v. Environmental Protection Agency,
540 U.S. 461, 496 (2004); see also 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A)
(Administrative Procedure Act). Also, we note that
this is the standard that the courts have utilized in
reviewing Commission actions. See, e.g., Natural
Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. v. SEC, et al.,
606 F.2d 1031, 1049 (DC Cir. 1979); Bradford Nat’l
Clearing Corp. et al. v. SEC, 590 F.2d 1085, 1093
(DC Cir. 1978).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47447
written notice provided to the firm and
the PCAOB no more than 75 calendar
days after notification to the firm and
the PCAOB that the Commission is
granting the request for an interim
review, unless the Commission extends
the period of review for good cause. The
default 75-day period allows for the
maximum 15-day period in the rule for
the PCAOB to respond, an opportunity
for the Commission to determine if
additional information is needed, the
ability, if appropriate, to have at least
one request for additional information
and an opportunity for the other party
to respond (up to seven days under the
rule each), and an opportunity for the
Commission to review and complete the
request.
Consistent with the purpose of
providing an opportunity for review
before public disclosure of all or a
portion of an inspection report by the
PCAOB, Rule 140 provides that, unless
otherwise determined by the
Commission, the decision to grant or
deny a review request and the results of
the Commission’s review shall be nonpublic, and the information or
documents submitted, created, or
obtained by the Commission or its staff
in the course of the review shall be
deemed non-public.22 Further Section
104(h)(2) provides that any decision of
the Commission with respect to interim
review under Section 104(h) is not
subject to judicial review.23 Finally,
again consistent with the limited
purposes of review under Section
104(h), any action taken by the
Commission relates solely to the
publication of the relevant inspection
report and does not imply that the firm
is exonerated or that no action may
ultimately result from the inspection or
from an investigation by the
Commission, the PCAOB, or any other
party.
D. Regulation P
The Commission is establishing a
separate subpart in the Commission’s
Informal and Other Procedures—
Regulation P—to include procedural
rules relating to the PCAOB in one
central location. The intention is to
designate Rules in Regulation P
according to the Section of the Act to
which they primarily relate. As such,
the procedural rule regarding interim
22 See also Section 105(b)(5) of the Act. Rule 140
also provides that nothing shall be construed to
impair or limit the ability of any party to request
confidential treatment under the Freedom of
Information Act [15 U.S.C. 7215(b)(5)], or any other
applicable law. Applicants may wish to consider
whether seeking confidential treatment would be
appropriate.
23 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2).
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
47448
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
inspection report reviews, which relates
primarily to Section 104 of the Act, is
being designated as Rule 140. In
addition, the Commission is
redesignating its existing procedural
rule relating to the PCAOB budget
process from Rule 11 to Rule 190 given
the process relates primarily to Section
109 of the Act.
E. Delegation of Authority
In connection with adopting Rule 140,
the Commission also is adopting Rule
30–11 of our Rules of Organization and
Program Management to delegate
authority to the Commission’s Chief
Accountant to process interim reviews
subject to Rule 140. Among other
matters, the Chief Accountant is
delegated authority to grant or deny
requests for interim review, to extend
the time periods for the PCAOB or the
firm to respond under the rule, to
request additional information in
conjunction with the review, to make a
determination with respect to the
review, and to notify the PCAOB and
the firm of the results of the review.
This delegation of authority is intended
to conserve Commission resources by
permitting the Chief Accountant to
fulfill the Commission’s review
requirements in a timely manner.
Nevertheless, the staff may submit
matters to the Commission for
consideration, as it deems
appropriate.24 Further, we expect that
the Commission staff will process
interim Commission reviews with
respect to inspection reports as
efficiently and expeditiously as possible
to avoid any unnecessary delay in
making the inspection report available
to the public, as required by the Act.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
II. Administrative Procedure Act,
Regulatory Flexibility Act, and
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Commission finds, in accordance
with Section 553(b)(3)(A) of the
Administrative Procedure Act
(‘‘APA’’),25 that this revision relates
solely to agency organization,
procedure, or practice. It is, therefore,
not subject to the provisions of the APA
requiring notice and opportunity for
public comment.26 The Regulatory
24 The Commission may also review any action
taken by delegated authority. See Section 4A(b) of
the Exchange Act. The Commission is revising its
Rules of Practice to reflect this new delegation of
authority to the Chief Accountant. Consistent with
Section 104(h)(2), the Commission is also revising
its Rules of Practice to provide that actions taken
by delegated authority with respect to Rule 140 are
not subject to judicial review.
25 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A).
26 In addition, we intend to apply these
procedures to pending applications, without further
delay.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
Flexibility Act,27 therefore, does not
apply. Similarly, because these rules
relate to ‘‘agency organization,
procedure or practice that does not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties,’’
analysis of major status under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act is not required.28 The rules
do not contain any collection of
information requirements as defined by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
as amended.29
The Commission intends, after the
Commission’s initial experience under
the new procedures, to issue a notice of
comment in the future so the
Commission can consider any such
comments, along with the Commission’s
initial experience, in order to determine
whether changes in pursuit of
enhancements or efficiencies would be
warranted.
III. Consideration of the Costs and
Benefits of the Rule Amendments
We are sensitive to the costs and
benefits imposed by our rules and
amendments, and we have identified
certain costs and benefits of these rules.
The potential benefits of the rule
amendments include clarification and
increased transparency of the
Commission’s review and oversight
procedures with respect to the
PCAOB 30 and the interim review
procedures set forth in Rule 140, and
the benefits of process: Notice,
opportunity to be heard, efficiency, and
fairness. Rule 140 establishes a set of
procedures for registered public
accounting firms to follow in requesting
interim Commission review with
respect to a PCAOB inspection report, as
required by the Act. The rule benefits
inspected firms by informing them of
the procedures to follow in initiating the
review process and obtaining
Commission review with respect to
inspection findings and determinations
with which they disagree. Commission
review with respect to the PCAOB’s
inspection reports would allow the
Commission to protect the public
interest in the quality of PCAOB reports.
It could provide a further incentive for
the PCAOB to exercise diligence in its
inspection and remedial determination
process, including encouraging the
PCAOB to make determinations on the
basis of reasoned support and sound
analysis. The review procedure also
benefits inspected firms by protecting
27 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
U.S.C. 804(3)(C).
29 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
30 In addition, organizing Commission procedural
rules relating to the PCAOB in one subpart also will
make locating such rules easier.
28 5
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
against publication of inspection
findings that the Commission ultimately
may remand to the PCAOB for
reconsideration.
There also are potential costs of the
rule. Firms involved in Commission
review proceedings may incur
additional costs beyond those already
incurred in complying with PCAOB
procedures for seeking review of the
inspection report’s findings at the
PCAOB level. However, a request for
interim review of a PCAOB inspection
report by the Commission is optional.
Thus, a registered public accounting
firm would incur these costs only if it
expected the benefits from the review
process to justify the costs.
The PCAOB also may incur additional
costs as a result of the rule amendments,
for example by adjusting its inspection
process in anticipation of review
requests and providing information to
the Commission, especially at the
Commission’s request. The imposition
of additional costs, beyond those
already incurred by the PCAOB, could
lead to higher accounting support fees
assessed against issuers to cover the
PCAOB’s recoverable budget
expenditure. To the extent the PCAOB
has been publishing inspection reports
before it has been feasible for firms to
request interim review of findings, the
public may experience a delay in
publication from existing practice.
However, to the extent those reports
have included findings that would be
remanded under Rule 140, providing an
opportunity for those findings to be
corrected may increase public
confidence in the findings, including
that the findings would not be further
subject to change upon publication.
IV. Consideration of Impact on the
Economy, Burden on Competition and
Promotion of Efficiency, Competition
and Capital Formation
Section 23(a)(2) of the Exchange Act
requires us, when adopting rules under
the Exchange Act, to consider the
impact on competition of any rule we
adopt. The rule amendments are
intended to provide additional guidance
with respect to the Commission’s
oversight responsibilities under
Sections 104 and 107 of the SarbanesOxley Act. The rule amendments
provide procedures for requesting
Commission review with respect to
inspection reports issued by the
PCAOB.
Section 3(f) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 31 requires us, when
engaging in rulemaking that requires us
to consider or determine whether an
31 15
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
U.S.C. 78c(f).
06AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
action is necessary or in the public
interest, to consider, in addition to the
protection of investors, whether the
action will promote competition and
capital formation. We are not aware of
any effect the rule amendments will
have on competition, and capital
formation. They are designed to
enhance the transparency of the
Commission’s and the PCAOB’s
administrative practices, by facilitating
the public’s understanding of the
Commission’s oversight responsibilities
with respect to PCAOB, and by
promoting public confidence in the
PCAOB’s auditor oversight functions.
The amendments may increase the
efficiency of the PCAOB inspection
process. Rule 140, which sets forth the
administrative procedures relating to
the Commission’s review with respect to
PCAOB inspection reports, applies to all
registered public accounting firms that
seek administrative review by the
Commission. Therefore, the
Commission does not expect the rules to
have an anti-competitive effect.
V. Statutory Basis and Text of Rules
The Commission is amending its
Informal and Other Procedures under
the authority set forth in Sections 3,
101(c)(5), 104, and 107 of the Act; and
Sections 4A and 23 of the Exchange Act.
The amendments to the Commission’s
Rules of Organization and Program
Management and Rules of Practice are
adopted pursuant to the authorities set
forth therein.
List of Subjects
17 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and
procedure, Authority delegations
(Government agencies), Organization
and functions (Government agencies).
17 CFR Part 201
Administrative practice and
procedure.
17 CFR Part 202
Administrative practice and
procedure, Securities.
Text of Amendments
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, Title 17, Chapter II of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
PART 200—ORGANIZATION;
CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND
INFORMATION AND REQUESTS
1. The general authority citation for
part 200 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77o, 77s, 77sss, 78d,
78d–1, 78d–2, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 80a–37,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
80b–11, and 7201 et seq., unless otherwise
noted.
*
■
*
*
*
*
2. Add § 200.30–11 to read as follows:
§ 200.30–11 Delegation of authority to the
Chief Accountant.
Pursuant to the provisions of Pub. L.
101–181, 101 Stat. 1254, 1255 (15 U.S.C.
78d–1, 78d–2), the Securities and
Exchange Commission hereby delegates,
until the Commission orders otherwise,
the following functions to the Chief
Accountant of the Commission, to be
performed by him or her or under his
or her direction by such person or
persons as may be designated from time
to time by the Chairman of the
Commission:
(a) In connection with Commission
review of inspection reports of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (‘‘PCAOB’’) under 15 U.S.C.
7214(h) and § 202.140:
(1) To grant or deny review requests
and notify the firm and the PCAOB as
to whether the Commission will grant
the review request under § 202.140(d);
(2) To extend the time periods set
forth in § 202.140(e) within which the
PCAOB, registered public accounting
firm or an associated person may submit
responsive information and documents
in connection with a request for
Commission review.
(3) To request additional information
pursuant to § 202.140(e) relating to the
PCAOB’s assessments or determination
under review from the PCAOB, the
registered public accounting firm, or
any associated person of the firm during
the course of an interim review of an
inspection report, and to grant the
PCAOB, the firm or any associated
person a period of up to seven calendar
days to respond to any information
obtained.
(4) To consider requests for review of
inspection reports and, based on such
review, to not object to all or part of the
assessments or determination of the
PCAOB and terminate the stay of
publication, or to remand to the PCAOB
with instructions that the stay of
publication is permanent or that the
PCAOB take such other actions as he or
she deems necessary or appropriate
with respect to publication, including,
but not limited to, revising the final
inspection report or determinations
before publication, and to provide the
written notice communicating the same
to the PCAOB and the registered public
accounting firm, consistent with
§ 202.140.
(5) To determine that a timely review
request by a firm will not operate as a
stay of publication of those portions of
the final inspection report or
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47449
determinations described in
§ 202.140(b) that are the subject of the
firm’s review request pursuant to
§ 202.140(c)(5), as well as to determine
that publication of the remainder of the
final inspection report or criticisms or
defects in the quality control systems
would not be necessary or appropriate
pursuant to § 202.140(c)(5).
(6) To, in the event the Commission
does grant a review request pursuant to
§ 202.140, determine that the stay of
publication shall not continue pursuant
to § 202.140(d).
(7) To, in the event that the review
pursuant to § 202.140(e) has not been
completed and a written notice has not
been sent 75 calendar days after
notification to the firm and the PCAOB
that it is granting the request for an
interim review, grant an extension of
time under the authority set forth in
§ 202.140(e).
(b) Notwithstanding anything in the
foregoing, in any case in which the
Chief Accountant believes it
appropriate, he or she may submit the
matter to the Commission.
PART 201—RULES OF PRACTICE
3. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s, 77sss, 78w, 78x,
79t, 80a–37 and 80b–11; 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 201.430 is amended by
adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 201.430 Appeal of actions made
pursuant to delegated authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
7214(h)(2), any decision by the
Commission pursuant to 200.30–11
shall not be reviewable under 15 U.S.C.
78y and shall not be deemed ‘final
agency action’ for purposes of 5 U.S.C.
704.
PART 202—INFORMAL AND OTHER
PROCEDURES
5. The general authority citation for
part 202 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s, 77t, 78d–1, 78u,
78w, 78ll(d), 79r, 79t, 77sss, 77uuu, 80a–37,
80a–41, 80b–9, 80b–11, and 7201 et seq.,
unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Add subpart A to part 202 after
§ 202.12 to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
47450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart A—Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board
(Regulation P)
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 202.140 Interim Commission review of
PCAOB inspection reports.
(a) Definitions.
(1) Board or PCAOB means the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board.
(2) Registered public accounting firm
or Firm shall have the meaning set forth
in 15 U.S.C. 7201(a)(12).
(3) Associated person means a person
associated with the registered public
accounting firm as defined in 15 U.S.C.
7201(a)(9).
(b) Reviewable matters. A registered
public accounting firm may request
interim Commission review of an
assessment or determination by the
PCAOB contained in an inspection
report prepared under 15 U.S.C. 7214
and relating to that firm, if the firm:
(1) Has provided the PCAOB with a
response, pursuant to the rules of the
PCAOB, to the substance of particular
items in a draft inspection report and
disagrees with the assessments relating
to those items contained in any final
inspection report prepared by the
PCAOB following such response;
(2) Disagrees with an assessment
contained in any final inspection report
that was not contained in the draft
inspection report provided to the firm
under 15 U.S.C. 7214(f) or the rules of
the PCAOB; or
(3) Disagrees with the determination
of the PCAOB that criticisms or defects
in the quality control systems of the
firm that were identified in an
inspection report, but not disclosed to
the public, have not been addressed to
the satisfaction of the PCAOB within 12
months after the date of that inspection
report.
(c) Procedures for requesting interim
Commission review.
(1) A request for interim Commission
review with respect to matters described
in paragraph (b) of this section must be
submitted to the Commission’s Office of
the Secretary within 30 calendar days of
the following:
(i) The date the firm is provided a
copy of the final inspection report
described in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of
this section; or
(ii) The date the firm receives notice
of the PCAOB’s determination described
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(2) The PCAOB shall not make
publicly available the final inspection
report or criticisms or defects in the
quality control systems of the firm
subject to a determination described in
paragraph (b) of this section, as
applicable, during the 30-day period
during which the firm may request
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
interim Commission review, unless the
firm consents in writing to earlier
publication of the report.
(3) A request for interim Commission
review (‘‘request’’ or ‘‘submission’’) must
be marked ‘‘Request for Interim
Commission Review With Respect to
PCAOB Inspection Report.’’ The request
must focus on the specific matters for
which relief is requested and succinctly
address the issues raised by the PCAOB.
The request, to the extent possible,
should include, for example:
(i) A copy of the particular inspection
report that is the subject of the request;
(ii) The specific assessments or
determinations that are the subject of
the request;
(iii) The alleged errors or deficiencies
in the PCAOB’s assessments or
determination and the reasons for the
firm’s position;
(iv) If the matter is being reviewed
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
any actions taken by the registered
public accounting firm to address
criticisms or defects identified in the
inspection report; and
(v) Any supporting documentation
relevant to the review.
(4) The firm must provide a copy of
its review request to the PCAOB
simultaneously with its submission to
the Commission.
(5) A timely review request by a firm
will operate as a stay of publication of
those portions of the final inspection
report or criticisms or defects in the
quality control systems of the firm
subject to a determination described in
paragraph (b) of this section, as
applicable, that are the subject of the
firm’s review request, unless the
Commission otherwise determines in its
own discretion. Upon expiration of the
30-day period during which the firm
may request interim Commission
review, the PCAOB shall make publicly
available the remainder of the final
inspection report or criticisms or defects
in the quality control systems of the
firm that were indentified in an
inspection report, as applicable, that are
not the subject of the firm’s review
request, unless the Commission
otherwise determines that such a result
would not be necessary or appropriate.
(6) If the firm fails to make a timely
review request, pursuant to Section
104(g)(2) of the Act, the PCAOB shall
make publicly available the final
inspection report or criticisms or defects
in the quality control systems of the
firm that were indentified in an
inspection report, as applicable.
(d) Procedures for granting or denying
the review request. Within 30 calendar
days of a timely review request, the
Commission will notify the firm and the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PCAOB as to whether the Commission
will exercise its discretion to grant the
request for an interim review. If the
Commission does not grant the review
request, the stay of publication is
terminated upon notification to the firm
and the PCAOB. If the Commission does
grant the review request, the stay of
publication shall continue unless the
Commission determines otherwise in its
own discretion, or unless the firm
consents in writing to the PCAOB, with
a copy to the Commission, to earlier
publication.
(e) Procedures where a review request
has been granted.
(1) Where the Commission has
notified the firm and the PCAOB that it
is granting the request for an interim
review, the PCAOB may submit
responsive information and documents
with the Commission within 15
calendar days of receipt of such notice.
The PCAOB must provide a copy of
such information and documents
simultaneously to the firm.
(2) During the course of the interim
review, the Commission may request
additional information relating to the
PCAOB’s assessments or determination
under review, and provide a period of
up to seven calendar days to respond to
such request, from the PCAOB, the firm,
and any associated person of the firm.
The Commission may grant the firm or
the PCAOB a period of up to seven
calendar days to respond to any
information obtained pursuant to this
paragraph. The firm or the PCAOB, as
applicable, shall provide
simultaneously to the other party all
information provided as a result of a
request for additional information or
responses thereto. The firm with which
any associated person from whom
information is requested shall provide
simultaneously to the PCAOB all
information provided as a result of a
request for additional information or
responses thereto. If the firm (including
any associated person) or the PCAOB
fails to respond timely to a request from
the Commission, such failure may serve
as the basis for the Commission to
conclude its review and make a
determination adverse to the nonresponsive party.
(3) The Commission, based on the
information submitted by the firm, the
PCAOB and any associated persons,
shall consider whether the PCAOB’s
assessments or determination are
arbitrary and capricious, or otherwise
not consistent with the purposes of the
Act.
(4) At the conclusion of its review, the
Commission shall inform the firm and
the PCAOB in writing that the
Commission:
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 151 / Friday, August 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Does not object to all or part of the
assessments or determination of the
PCAOB and the stay of publication is
terminated; or
(ii) Remands to the PCAOB with
instructions that the stay of publication
is permanent or that the PCAOB take
such other actions as the Commission
deems necessary or appropriate with
respect to publication, including, but
not limited to, revising the final
inspection report or determinations
before publication.
(5) The review pursuant to this
section shall be completed and a written
notice pursuant to this section shall be
sent no more than 75 calendar days after
notification to the firm and the PCAOB
that the Commission is granting the
request for an interim review, unless the
Commission extends the period for good
cause.
(f) Treatment of review.
(1) Time periods in this section shall
be computed as provided in the
Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 CFR
201.160.
(2) Unless otherwise determined by
the Commission, the decision to grant or
deny a review request and the
conclusions of the Commission’s review
shall be non-public, and the information
or documents submitted, created, or
obtained by the Commission or its staff
in the course of the review shall be
deemed non-public. Nothing in this rule
shall be construed to impair or limit the
ability of any party to request
confidential treatment under the
Freedom of Information Act, 15 U.S.C.
7215(b)(5), or any other applicable law.
(3) Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2),
any decision of the Commission as a
result of an interim review with respect
to a PCAOB inspection report, including
whether a request for review is granted
or denied, shall not be reviewable under
15 U.S.C. 78y and shall not be deemed
to be ‘‘final agency action’’ for purposes
of 5 U.S.C. 704.
(4) Any action taken by the
Commission relates solely to the
publication of the relevant inspection
report and does not affect the ability of
the Commission or PCAOB to take
appropriate action.
(g) Designation of address;
Representation.
(1) When a registered public
accounting firm first submits a request
for interim Commission review, or an
associated person first submits
information related to a request, the firm
or associated person shall submit to the
Commission, and keep current, an
address at which any notice or other
written communication furnished to the
firm or associated person may be sent,
a contact name and telephone number
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Aug 05, 2010
Jkt 220001
where the firm or associated person may
be reached during business hours and,
if represented, the representative’s
name, business address, and telephone
number.
(2) If the firm, PCAOB, or associated
person will be represented by a
representative, the initial submission of
that person shall be accompanied by the
notice of appearance required by
§ 201.102(d). The other provisions of
§ 201.102 with respect to representation
before the Commission shall apply.
§ 202.11
[Redesignated as § 202.190]
7. Redesignate § 202.11 as § 202.190
under Subpart A.
■
Dated: July 26, 2010.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–18860 Filed 8–5–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–247C]
Schedules of Controlled Substances;
Placement of 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-(n)propylthiophenethylamine and NBenzylpiperazine Into Schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act; Correction
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule: correction.
AGENCY:
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is correcting a
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of March 18, 2004. The final
rule pertained to the scheduling of NBenzylpiperazine (BZP), and contained
an error regarding the potency of BZP
relative to amphetamine. Although DEA
used the correct figures in arriving at its
scheduling determination, the agency is
publishing this correction to provide an
official statement of the actual figures.
This correction does not address the
scheduling of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)propylthiophenethylamine (2C–T–7)
which was also placed into schedule I
as a result of the above cited
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
This correction is effective
August 6, 2010 without further action.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47451
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152, Telephone (202)
307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
DEA is correcting an inadvertent error
that occurred in a Final Rule that
scheduled the substance nBenzylpiperazine (BZP) as a schedule I
controlled substance. In a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, published on
September 8, 2003 (68 FR 52872), DEA
proposed the control of BZP in schedule
I of the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA). A Final Rule, published on
March 18, 2004 (69 FR 12794), finalized
the placement of BZP in schedule I of
the CSA.
Each of these rules contained a
misstatement in the ‘‘Supplementary
Information’’ section, with regard to the
potency differences between BZP and
amphetamine. In each rule, it was
erroneously stated that BZP is 10 to 20
times more potent than amphetamine.
In actuality, the converse is true (i.e.,
BZP is 10 to 20 times less potent than
amphetamine.) Therefore this
Rulemaking corrects this misstatement
in the Final Rule. Under separate
rulemaking, DEA is publishing a
correction to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, published September 8,
2003 (68 FR 52872).
DEA emphasizes that these errors
were made solely in the rules as
published in the Federal Register. Both
DEA and the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) considered
the correct BZP potencies during their
scheduling deliberations. The correct
potencies were included in both the
HHS scientific and medical evaluation
document, and in DEA’s scheduling
document, which were used to make the
determination for control. The public
docket for BZP contains both of these
review documents. In addition, DEA has
already published on the agency’s Web
site the correct figures regarding relative
potency.
The determination of control of BZP
was made after consideration of all the
available data and all eight factors and
the criteria for schedule I as specified in
21 U.S.C. 811 and 812. The
amphetamine-like property of BZP was
determined following the collective
review and consideration of all the
available evidence including drug
discrimination and self-administration
and other information. These studies
were briefly mentioned in the rules
controlling BZP as a schedule I
controlled substance and were
discussed in detail in the scientific and
medical evaluation and scheduling
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 151 (Friday, August 6, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47444-47451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18860]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 200, 201 and 202
[Release No. 34-62575]
Amendments to the Informal and Other Procedures, Rules of
Organization and Program Management, and Rules of Practice; Interim
Commission Review of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Inspection Reports and Regulation P
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') is
amending its Informal and Other Procedures to add a rule to facilitate
interim Commission review of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
[[Page 47445]]
(``PCAOB'') inspection reports under Section 104(h) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (the ``Act''), and its Rules of Organization and
Program Management and Rules of Practice to delegate authority to the
Chief Accountant related to these reviews. The Commission is also
establishing a subpart in its Informal and Other Procedures--Regulation
P--to include procedural rules relating to the PCAOB.
DATES: Effective Date: September 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Cohan (Senior Special Counsel)
or John Offenbacher (Professional Accounting Fellow) at (202) 551-5300,
Office of the Chief Accountant, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100
F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-7561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is amending: (1) Its Informal
and Other Procedures \1\ to establish a new subpart (``Regulation
P''),\2\ to establish a set of procedures to facilitate requests by
registered public accounting firms for interim Commission review of
PCAOB inspection reports (Sec. 202.140), and to redesignate existing
Rule 12 (Sec. 202.11) as Rule 190 (Sec. 202.190); (2) its Rules of
Organization and Program Management \3\ to provide delegations of
authority to the Chief Accountant related to these reviews (Sec.
200.30-11); and (3) its Rules of Practice \4\ to reflect the new
delegations of authority (Sec. 201.430 and Sec. 201.431).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 CFR 202 et seq.
\2\ 17 CFR 202 subpart 100.
\3\ 17 CFR 200 et seq.
\4\ 17 CFR 201 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Discussion of Rule Amendments
A. Introduction
The Act established the PCAOB to oversee the audit of companies
that are subject to the securities laws, and related matters, in order
to protect the interests of investors and further the public interest
in the preparation of informative, accurate, and independent audit
reports. The PCAOB operates under the comprehensive oversight and
enforcement authority of the Commission.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Act vests the Commission with oversight duties and
responsibilities, including the duties to appoint the members of the
PCAOB, approve PCAOB rules and professional standards for them to
take effect, act as an appellate authority for PCAOB enforcement
actions, and approve the PCAOB's budget and annual accounting
support fee. The Commission also, among other things, may amend
existing PCAOB rules, assign additional tasks to the PCAOB as
appropriate, oversee the PCAOB's exercise of certain assigned powers
and duties, and limit the PCAOB's activities and remove PCAOB
members. See, e.g., Title I of the Act [15 U.S.C. 7211-7219].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with that oversight, Section 104(h) of the Act provides
for the opportunity of a registered public accounting firm to request
interim Commission review with respect to PCAOB inspection reports. The
Commission is adopting new rules to implement the Act's provisions
relating to these interim review requests.
B. Background
Section 104 of the Act requires the PCAOB to conduct a continuing
program of inspections of each registered public accounting firm.\6\
That section of the Act directs the PCAOB to publish a written report
of its findings for each inspection.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Section 104(a) of the Act.
\7\ See Section 104(g) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As required by the Act, PCAOB rules provide that a registered
public accounting firm may review and respond to a draft inspection
report.\8\ However, when the PCAOB first publishes its report, no
portions of the inspection report that deal with criticisms of, or
potential defects in, the quality control systems of the firm under
inspection shall be made public if those criticisms or defects are
addressed by the firm, to the satisfaction of the PCAOB, not later than
12 months after the date of the inspection report.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Section 104(f) of the Act and PCAOB Rule 4007.
\9\ See Section 104(g)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 104 of the Act also provides that a registered public
accounting firm may seek interim review by the Commission, pursuant to
such rules as the Commission may promulgate, if the firm either:
(1) Has responded to the substance of particular items in the
PCAOB's draft inspection report and disagrees with the assessments
contained in any final report prepared by the PCAOB following that
response, or
(2) Disagrees with the PCAOB's determination that quality control
criticisms or defects identified in the inspection report have not been
addressed to the satisfaction of the PCAOB within 12 months of the date
of the inspection report.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Section 104(h)(1) of the Act.
The Act further provides that a firm may request any such review within
30 days of the event that gives rise to the review.\11\ We believe
implicit in the language of 104(h)(1) is that the firm may seek review
both with respect to items to which the firm responded to the PCAOB in
connection with a draft inspection report and disagrees with the
assessments relating to those items contained in any final report, as
well as any assessments contained in any final inspection report that
was not contained in the draft inspection report provided to the firm
with which the firm disagrees (e.g., items on which the firm did not
have an opportunity to comment in connection with the draft report).
New Rule 140, which we are adopting today, clarifies that these are
separate reviewable matters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Section 104(h)(3) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To implement Section 104 of the Act as to the PCAOB's basic
inspection program, the Commission approved a set of rules proposed by
the PCAOB.\12\ These rules provide that the PCAOB will make a draft
inspection report available for review by the firm that is the subject
of the report, and the firm may submit a written response to the draft
report, which will become part of the inspection report.\13\ A separate
PCAOB rule implements the Act's 12-month delay of publication of any
portions of an inspection report that deal with criticisms of, or
defects in, the inspected firm's quality control systems.\14\ During
that 12-month period, the firm that is the subject of the report may
submit evidence or otherwise demonstrate to the PCAOB that it has
improved its quality control systems and remedied the defects in
question. If the PCAOB determines that the firm has addressed the
quality control defects and criticisms in the final report
satisfactorily, the portion of the report that dealt with those defects
and criticisms will not be made public.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See PCAOB Rules 4000-4010, PCAOB Release No. 2003-19
(October 7, 2003). The rules were approved by the Commission in
Release No. 34-49787 (June 1, 2004).
\13\ See PCAOB Rule 4007. See also Section 104(f) of the Act.
\14\ See PCAOB Rule 4009.
\15\ See Section 104(g)(2) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the other hand, if the inspected firm has failed to address
those defects and criticisms to the satisfaction of the PCAOB within
the 12-month period mandated by Sections 104(g) and (h) of the Act, the
PCAOB will take one of the following actions:
(1) If the inspected firm failed to make any submission to the
PCAOB concerning the firm's efforts to address the quality control
defects or criticisms, the PCAOB will make those portions of the report
public upon expiration of the 12-month period;
(2) If the firm made a submission to the PCAOB concerning the
firm's efforts to address the quality control defects or criticisms,
but did not seek timely interim Commission review of an adverse PCAOB
determination concerning those defects or criticisms,
[[Page 47446]]
the PCAOB will make public those portions of the report that deal with
criticisms of or potential defects in quality control systems that the
firm has not addressed to the satisfaction of the Board upon expiration
of a 30-day period during which the firm may seek Commission review; or
(3) If the inspected firm made a timely request for interim
Commission review, the PCAOB will make public those portions of the
report that deal with criticisms of or potential defects in quality
control systems that the firm has not addressed to the satisfaction of
the Board 30 days after the firm formally requested interim Commission
review, unless the Commission, by rule or order, directs otherwise.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See PCAOB Rule 4009(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Rule Amendments
We are adopting new Rule 140 to provide procedures for firms to
follow in requesting interim Commission review with respect to a PCAOB
inspection report, including examples of the types of information that
would facilitate the Commission's review. Consistent with the time
periods in the Act, the rule specifies that a request for interim
Commission review must be submitted to the Commission's Office of the
Secretary, with a copy to the PCAOB, within 30 days following either
the date the firm is provided a copy of the final inspection report
(with respect to a review sought pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of
the Act), or the date the firm receives notice of the PCAOB's adverse
determination with respect to remediation of quality control defects or
criticisms (with respect to a review sought pursuant to Section
104(h)(1)(B) of the Act).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Time periods for purposes of Rule 140 shall be computed as
provided in Rule 160 of the Commission's Rules of Practice. 17 CFR
201.160.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The review request should be marked ``Request for Interim
Commission Review with Respect to PCAOB Inspection Report.'' Firms
seeking interim Commission review should submit, along with the review
request, information that, to the extent possible, is focused on the
specific matters for which review is requested, and that clearly and
succinctly addresses the issues raised by the PCAOB. Generally, we
expect that this information would include, but may not necessarily be
limited to:
The particular inspection report that is the subject of
the request,
The specific assessments or determinations that are the
subject of the request,
The alleged errors or deficiencies in the assessments or
determinations and the reasons they are believed to be in error or
deficient,
If the action relates to an adverse determination by the
PCAOB with respect to remediation of quality control defects or
criticisms, any actions the firm took to address criticisms or defects
identified in the inspection report,\18\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ A request with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(B) is limited
to situations where the firm disagrees with a Board determination
that criticisms or defects indentified in a previously issued
inspection report have not been satisfactorily addressed. It is not
an additional opportunity to seek review with respect to the
original criticisms or defects themselves. If a firm disagrees with
an original criticism or defect and wishes to request Commission
review, the firm should initiate that request in accordance with
Section 104(h)(1)(A) within 30 days of when the firm is originally
provided a copy of the final inspection report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any supporting documentation relevant to the review
including, but not limited to, any documents previously submitted to
the PCAOB that the firm wishes the Commission to consider.
The rule directs the firm to provide a copy of its review request
to the PCAOB simultaneously with its submission to the Commission. This
is consistent with directions throughout the new rule for the firm and
the PCAOB to provide copies of the information they submit to the
Commission to the other party simultaneous with their submission to the
Commission to provide an opportunity for both parties to be informed of
each other's respective positions.
With respect to interim reviews contemplated by Section
104(h)(1)(A) of the Act, PCAOB Rule 4008 is silent regarding whether a
final inspection report would be made public before an inspected firm
has an opportunity to review the final inspection report and determine
whether to request interim Commission review. In order to prevent the
release of any final report before the inspected firm has an
opportunity to seek Commission review, the new rule provides that the
PCAOB shall not make a final inspection report publicly available until
the firm that is the subject of the report has had 30 calendar days in
which to seek interim Commission review, unless the firm consents in
writing to earlier publication of the report. As noted above, this is
consistent with the provision in PCAOB Rule 4009 that delays
publication of unresolved quality control defects or criticisms for 30
calendar days in certain circumstances. New Rule 140 also provides for
a similar delay of publication with respect to the possibility of a
review request pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act.
We do not believe that matters potentially subject to interim
Commission review should be subject to publication, absent consent by
the firm, before the firm's time to seek that review has expired, and
we see no sufficient reason to vary this result based on whether review
would be pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of the Act or Section
104(h)(1)(B) of the Act.\19\ We understand this procedure may require
the PCAOB to adjust its processes to account for the 30-day period for
a firm to request review before initial publication of the final
inspection report. However, given the standard of review articulated
below with respect to the Commission's processing of such reviews, as
well as the fact that the Commission may decline to grant review
requests, we do not believe providing for an initial stay of the
publication of a final inspection report will result in needless delays
or routine appeals simply to delay publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ In particular, we believe this approach is consistent with
Section 104(h) that an opportunity for interim Commission review is
meant to precede publication. Further, we believe this approach is
consistent with Section 104(g) of the Act, which provides that the
final inspection report will be made available to the public
``subject to'' the Section 104(h) review process, which itself is a
logical extension of the statutory requirement for the PCAOB to
provide for a procedure for review before publication in accordance
with Section 104(f) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Rule 140 also provides that a timely review request by a firm
will operate as an automatic stay of publication of the portions of the
final inspection report that are the subject of the firm's review
request (with respect to requests pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of
the Act) or the portions of the inspection report that deal with
criticism of or potential defects in the quality control systems of the
firm that are the subject of the firm's review request (with respect to
requests pursuant to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act) unless the
Commission determines otherwise, in its own discretion.
At the end of the 30-day review request period, the PCAOB shall
make publicly available any portions of the final inspection report
that are not the subject of the firm's review request (with respect to
Section 104(h)(1)(A) of the Act) or criticisms of or potential defects
in the quality control systems of the firm that are not the subject of
the firm's review request (with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the
Act), unless the Commission otherwise determines that such a result
would not be necessary or appropriate. This helps to ensure timely
publication of the portions of the report that are not
[[Page 47447]]
subject to review. Further, if the firm fails to make a timely review
request, the PCAOB shall make publicly available the final inspection
report (with respect to Section 104(h)(1)(A) of the Act) or the
portions of the inspection report that deal with criticism of or
potential defects in the quality control systems of the firm (with
respect to Section 104(h)(1)(B) of the Act).
If a timely request for interim review with respect to an
inspection report is made, the Commission will notify the firm and the
PCAOB within 30 calendar days of the receipt of the request as to
whether the Commission in its discretion will grant the request for
interim review. We believe this provides an appropriate period of time
to evaluate the initial review request while balancing the interest in
timely publication of inspection determinations. In considering whether
to grant a review request, among the factors that the Commission may
consider are whether the review request makes a reasonable showing that
review is appropriate or otherwise presents a concern. We do not intend
to routinely grant review requests absent some indication of concern.
If the Commission does not grant the review request, the stay of
publication is terminated upon notification to the firm and the PCAOB.
If the Commission notifies the firm and the PCAOB that the request for
interim review has been granted, the stay of publication shall continue
unless the Commission determines otherwise in its own discretion, or
unless the firm consents in writing to the PCAOB, with a copy to the
Commission to earlier publication.
Rule 140 provides that where the Commission has notified the firm
and the PCAOB that it is granting the request for an interim review,
the PCAOB may submit responsive information or documents with the
Commission, with a copy to the firm, within 15 calendar days of receipt
of such notice. We believe this period of time should be reasonable
given that the PCAOB drafted the final inspection report and considered
the evidence for its decision.
The Commission also may request additional information, and provide
a period of up to seven calendar days to respond to such request, from
the firm in question, the PCAOB, and any associated person of the firm.
The Commission may grant the firm or the PCAOB a period of up to seven
calendar days to respond to any information obtained. This period of
time is selected to balance the interest for an opportunity to respond
with the expediency needed to complete the review and, if applicable,
have the underlying findings or determinations published. Likewise, if
the firm or the PCAOB fails to respond timely to a request from the
Commission, such failure may make it impossible for the Commission to
complete its review and therefore could result in a determination
adverse to the non-responsive party.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Such failure on the part of the firm would include the
failure of an ``associated person'' of a firm to respond.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information provided by the firm, together with any additional
information provided by the PCAOB or associated persons, provides a
basis for Commission consideration of the review. Rule 140 provides
that, based on this information, the Commission shall consider whether
the PCAOB's assessments or determinations are arbitrary and capricious,
or otherwise not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
Congress did not prescribe a standard of review for PCAOB
inspection reports in the Act. Therefore, in establishing this standard
of review, the Commission is informed by the approach that the courts
have generally taken in reviewing agency action in the absence of a
statutorily prescribed standard of review.\21\ Further, an arbitrary
and capricious standard of review creates an incentive for the firm to
fully address and pursue areas of concern in the inspection report with
the PCAOB, under its rules, prior to requesting review by the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v.
Environmental Protection Agency, 540 U.S. 461, 496 (2004); see also
5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) (Administrative Procedure Act). Also, we note
that this is the standard that the courts have utilized in reviewing
Commission actions. See, e.g., Natural Resources Defense Council,
Inc., et al. v. SEC, et al., 606 F.2d 1031, 1049 (DC Cir. 1979);
Bradford Nat'l Clearing Corp. et al. v. SEC, 590 F.2d 1085, 1093 (DC
Cir. 1978).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the end of its review, the Commission shall inform the firm
seeking review and the PCAOB in writing that the Commission:
(1) Does not object to all or part of the PCAOB's assessments or
determination and the stay of publication is terminated; or
(2) Remands to the PCAOB with instructions that the stay of
publication is permanent or that the PCAOB take such other actions as
the Commission deems necessary or appropriate with respect to
publication, including, but not limited to, revising the final
inspection report or determinations before publication.
To further encourage expediency in the review process, the rule
provides that the review is to be completed and written notice provided
to the firm and the PCAOB no more than 75 calendar days after
notification to the firm and the PCAOB that the Commission is granting
the request for an interim review, unless the Commission extends the
period of review for good cause. The default 75-day period allows for
the maximum 15-day period in the rule for the PCAOB to respond, an
opportunity for the Commission to determine if additional information
is needed, the ability, if appropriate, to have at least one request
for additional information and an opportunity for the other party to
respond (up to seven days under the rule each), and an opportunity for
the Commission to review and complete the request.
Consistent with the purpose of providing an opportunity for review
before public disclosure of all or a portion of an inspection report by
the PCAOB, Rule 140 provides that, unless otherwise determined by the
Commission, the decision to grant or deny a review request and the
results of the Commission's review shall be non-public, and the
information or documents submitted, created, or obtained by the
Commission or its staff in the course of the review shall be deemed
non-public.\22\ Further Section 104(h)(2) provides that any decision of
the Commission with respect to interim review under Section 104(h) is
not subject to judicial review.\23\ Finally, again consistent with the
limited purposes of review under Section 104(h), any action taken by
the Commission relates solely to the publication of the relevant
inspection report and does not imply that the firm is exonerated or
that no action may ultimately result from the inspection or from an
investigation by the Commission, the PCAOB, or any other party.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See also Section 105(b)(5) of the Act. Rule 140 also
provides that nothing shall be construed to impair or limit the
ability of any party to request confidential treatment under the
Freedom of Information Act [15 U.S.C. 7215(b)(5)], or any other
applicable law. Applicants may wish to consider whether seeking
confidential treatment would be appropriate.
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Regulation P
The Commission is establishing a separate subpart in the
Commission's Informal and Other Procedures--Regulation P--to include
procedural rules relating to the PCAOB in one central location. The
intention is to designate Rules in Regulation P according to the
Section of the Act to which they primarily relate. As such, the
procedural rule regarding interim
[[Page 47448]]
inspection report reviews, which relates primarily to Section 104 of
the Act, is being designated as Rule 140. In addition, the Commission
is redesignating its existing procedural rule relating to the PCAOB
budget process from Rule 11 to Rule 190 given the process relates
primarily to Section 109 of the Act.
E. Delegation of Authority
In connection with adopting Rule 140, the Commission also is
adopting Rule 30-11 of our Rules of Organization and Program Management
to delegate authority to the Commission's Chief Accountant to process
interim reviews subject to Rule 140. Among other matters, the Chief
Accountant is delegated authority to grant or deny requests for interim
review, to extend the time periods for the PCAOB or the firm to respond
under the rule, to request additional information in conjunction with
the review, to make a determination with respect to the review, and to
notify the PCAOB and the firm of the results of the review. This
delegation of authority is intended to conserve Commission resources by
permitting the Chief Accountant to fulfill the Commission's review
requirements in a timely manner. Nevertheless, the staff may submit
matters to the Commission for consideration, as it deems
appropriate.\24\ Further, we expect that the Commission staff will
process interim Commission reviews with respect to inspection reports
as efficiently and expeditiously as possible to avoid any unnecessary
delay in making the inspection report available to the public, as
required by the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ The Commission may also review any action taken by
delegated authority. See Section 4A(b) of the Exchange Act. The
Commission is revising its Rules of Practice to reflect this new
delegation of authority to the Chief Accountant. Consistent with
Section 104(h)(2), the Commission is also revising its Rules of
Practice to provide that actions taken by delegated authority with
respect to Rule 140 are not subject to judicial review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Administrative Procedure Act, Regulatory Flexibility Act, and
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Commission finds, in accordance with Section 553(b)(3)(A) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA''),\25\ that this revision
relates solely to agency organization, procedure, or practice. It is,
therefore, not subject to the provisions of the APA requiring notice
and opportunity for public comment.\26\ The Regulatory Flexibility
Act,\27\ therefore, does not apply. Similarly, because these rules
relate to ``agency organization, procedure or practice that does not
substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties,''
analysis of major status under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act is not required.\28\ The rules do not contain
any collection of information requirements as defined by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, as amended.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A).
\26\ In addition, we intend to apply these procedures to pending
applications, without further delay.
\27\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
\28\ 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C).
\29\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission intends, after the Commission's initial experience
under the new procedures, to issue a notice of comment in the future so
the Commission can consider any such comments, along with the
Commission's initial experience, in order to determine whether changes
in pursuit of enhancements or efficiencies would be warranted.
III. Consideration of the Costs and Benefits of the Rule Amendments
We are sensitive to the costs and benefits imposed by our rules and
amendments, and we have identified certain costs and benefits of these
rules.
The potential benefits of the rule amendments include clarification
and increased transparency of the Commission's review and oversight
procedures with respect to the PCAOB \30\ and the interim review
procedures set forth in Rule 140, and the benefits of process: Notice,
opportunity to be heard, efficiency, and fairness. Rule 140 establishes
a set of procedures for registered public accounting firms to follow in
requesting interim Commission review with respect to a PCAOB inspection
report, as required by the Act. The rule benefits inspected firms by
informing them of the procedures to follow in initiating the review
process and obtaining Commission review with respect to inspection
findings and determinations with which they disagree. Commission review
with respect to the PCAOB's inspection reports would allow the
Commission to protect the public interest in the quality of PCAOB
reports. It could provide a further incentive for the PCAOB to exercise
diligence in its inspection and remedial determination process,
including encouraging the PCAOB to make determinations on the basis of
reasoned support and sound analysis. The review procedure also benefits
inspected firms by protecting against publication of inspection
findings that the Commission ultimately may remand to the PCAOB for
reconsideration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ In addition, organizing Commission procedural rules
relating to the PCAOB in one subpart also will make locating such
rules easier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There also are potential costs of the rule. Firms involved in
Commission review proceedings may incur additional costs beyond those
already incurred in complying with PCAOB procedures for seeking review
of the inspection report's findings at the PCAOB level. However, a
request for interim review of a PCAOB inspection report by the
Commission is optional. Thus, a registered public accounting firm would
incur these costs only if it expected the benefits from the review
process to justify the costs.
The PCAOB also may incur additional costs as a result of the rule
amendments, for example by adjusting its inspection process in
anticipation of review requests and providing information to the
Commission, especially at the Commission's request. The imposition of
additional costs, beyond those already incurred by the PCAOB, could
lead to higher accounting support fees assessed against issuers to
cover the PCAOB's recoverable budget expenditure. To the extent the
PCAOB has been publishing inspection reports before it has been
feasible for firms to request interim review of findings, the public
may experience a delay in publication from existing practice. However,
to the extent those reports have included findings that would be
remanded under Rule 140, providing an opportunity for those findings to
be corrected may increase public confidence in the findings, including
that the findings would not be further subject to change upon
publication.
IV. Consideration of Impact on the Economy, Burden on Competition and
Promotion of Efficiency, Competition and Capital Formation
Section 23(a)(2) of the Exchange Act requires us, when adopting
rules under the Exchange Act, to consider the impact on competition of
any rule we adopt. The rule amendments are intended to provide
additional guidance with respect to the Commission's oversight
responsibilities under Sections 104 and 107 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The rule amendments provide procedures for requesting Commission review
with respect to inspection reports issued by the PCAOB.
Section 3(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \31\ requires
us, when engaging in rulemaking that requires us to consider or
determine whether an
[[Page 47449]]
action is necessary or in the public interest, to consider, in addition
to the protection of investors, whether the action will promote
competition and capital formation. We are not aware of any effect the
rule amendments will have on competition, and capital formation. They
are designed to enhance the transparency of the Commission's and the
PCAOB's administrative practices, by facilitating the public's
understanding of the Commission's oversight responsibilities with
respect to PCAOB, and by promoting public confidence in the PCAOB's
auditor oversight functions. The amendments may increase the efficiency
of the PCAOB inspection process. Rule 140, which sets forth the
administrative procedures relating to the Commission's review with
respect to PCAOB inspection reports, applies to all registered public
accounting firms that seek administrative review by the Commission.
Therefore, the Commission does not expect the rules to have an anti-
competitive effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory Basis and Text of Rules
The Commission is amending its Informal and Other Procedures under
the authority set forth in Sections 3, 101(c)(5), 104, and 107 of the
Act; and Sections 4A and 23 of the Exchange Act. The amendments to the
Commission's Rules of Organization and Program Management and Rules of
Practice are adopted pursuant to the authorities set forth therein.
List of Subjects
17 CFR Part 200
Administrative practice and procedure, Authority delegations
(Government agencies), Organization and functions (Government
agencies).
17 CFR Part 201
Administrative practice and procedure.
17 CFR Part 202
Administrative practice and procedure, Securities.
Text of Amendments
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 17, Chapter II of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 200--ORGANIZATION; CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND INFORMATION AND
REQUESTS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 200 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77o, 77s, 77sss, 78d, 78d-1, 78d-2, 78w,
78ll(d), 78mm, 80a-37, 80b-11, and 7201 et seq., unless otherwise
noted.
* * * * *
0
2. Add Sec. 200.30-11 to read as follows:
Sec. 200.30-11 Delegation of authority to the Chief Accountant.
Pursuant to the provisions of Pub. L. 101-181, 101 Stat. 1254, 1255
(15 U.S.C. 78d-1, 78d-2), the Securities and Exchange Commission hereby
delegates, until the Commission orders otherwise, the following
functions to the Chief Accountant of the Commission, to be performed by
him or her or under his or her direction by such person or persons as
may be designated from time to time by the Chairman of the Commission:
(a) In connection with Commission review of inspection reports of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (``PCAOB'') under 15
U.S.C. 7214(h) and Sec. 202.140:
(1) To grant or deny review requests and notify the firm and the
PCAOB as to whether the Commission will grant the review request under
Sec. 202.140(d);
(2) To extend the time periods set forth in Sec. 202.140(e) within
which the PCAOB, registered public accounting firm or an associated
person may submit responsive information and documents in connection
with a request for Commission review.
(3) To request additional information pursuant to Sec. 202.140(e)
relating to the PCAOB's assessments or determination under review from
the PCAOB, the registered public accounting firm, or any associated
person of the firm during the course of an interim review of an
inspection report, and to grant the PCAOB, the firm or any associated
person a period of up to seven calendar days to respond to any
information obtained.
(4) To consider requests for review of inspection reports and,
based on such review, to not object to all or part of the assessments
or determination of the PCAOB and terminate the stay of publication, or
to remand to the PCAOB with instructions that the stay of publication
is permanent or that the PCAOB take such other actions as he or she
deems necessary or appropriate with respect to publication, including,
but not limited to, revising the final inspection report or
determinations before publication, and to provide the written notice
communicating the same to the PCAOB and the registered public
accounting firm, consistent with Sec. 202.140.
(5) To determine that a timely review request by a firm will not
operate as a stay of publication of those portions of the final
inspection report or determinations described in Sec. 202.140(b) that
are the subject of the firm's review request pursuant to Sec.
202.140(c)(5), as well as to determine that publication of the
remainder of the final inspection report or criticisms or defects in
the quality control systems would not be necessary or appropriate
pursuant to Sec. 202.140(c)(5).
(6) To, in the event the Commission does grant a review request
pursuant to Sec. 202.140, determine that the stay of publication shall
not continue pursuant to Sec. 202.140(d).
(7) To, in the event that the review pursuant to Sec. 202.140(e)
has not been completed and a written notice has not been sent 75
calendar days after notification to the firm and the PCAOB that it is
granting the request for an interim review, grant an extension of time
under the authority set forth in Sec. 202.140(e).
(b) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing, in any case in which
the Chief Accountant believes it appropriate, he or she may submit the
matter to the Commission.
PART 201--RULES OF PRACTICE
0
3. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s, 77sss, 78w, 78x, 79t, 80a-37 and 80b-
11; 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1).
* * * * *
0
4. Section 201.430 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.430 Appeal of actions made pursuant to delegated authority.
* * * * *
(c) * * * Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2), any decision by the
Commission pursuant to 200.30-11 shall not be reviewable under 15
U.S.C. 78y and shall not be deemed `final agency action' for purposes
of 5 U.S.C. 704.
PART 202--INFORMAL AND OTHER PROCEDURES
0
5. The general authority citation for part 202 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77s, 77t, 78d-1, 78u, 78w, 78ll(d), 79r,
79t, 77sss, 77uuu, 80a-37, 80a-41, 80b-9, 80b-11, and 7201 et seq.,
unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
6. Add subpart A to part 202 after Sec. 202.12 to read as follows:
[[Page 47450]]
Subpart A--Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (Regulation P)
Sec. 202.140 Interim Commission review of PCAOB inspection reports.
(a) Definitions.
(1) Board or PCAOB means the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board.
(2) Registered public accounting firm or Firm shall have the
meaning set forth in 15 U.S.C. 7201(a)(12).
(3) Associated person means a person associated with the registered
public accounting firm as defined in 15 U.S.C. 7201(a)(9).
(b) Reviewable matters. A registered public accounting firm may
request interim Commission review of an assessment or determination by
the PCAOB contained in an inspection report prepared under 15 U.S.C.
7214 and relating to that firm, if the firm:
(1) Has provided the PCAOB with a response, pursuant to the rules
of the PCAOB, to the substance of particular items in a draft
inspection report and disagrees with the assessments relating to those
items contained in any final inspection report prepared by the PCAOB
following such response;
(2) Disagrees with an assessment contained in any final inspection
report that was not contained in the draft inspection report provided
to the firm under 15 U.S.C. 7214(f) or the rules of the PCAOB; or
(3) Disagrees with the determination of the PCAOB that criticisms
or defects in the quality control systems of the firm that were
identified in an inspection report, but not disclosed to the public,
have not been addressed to the satisfaction of the PCAOB within 12
months after the date of that inspection report.
(c) Procedures for requesting interim Commission review.
(1) A request for interim Commission review with respect to matters
described in paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted to the
Commission's Office of the Secretary within 30 calendar days of the
following:
(i) The date the firm is provided a copy of the final inspection
report described in paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section; or
(ii) The date the firm receives notice of the PCAOB's determination
described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(2) The PCAOB shall not make publicly available the final
inspection report or criticisms or defects in the quality control
systems of the firm subject to a determination described in paragraph
(b) of this section, as applicable, during the 30-day period during
which the firm may request interim Commission review, unless the firm
consents in writing to earlier publication of the report.
(3) A request for interim Commission review (``request'' or
``submission'') must be marked ``Request for Interim Commission Review
With Respect to PCAOB Inspection Report.'' The request must focus on
the specific matters for which relief is requested and succinctly
address the issues raised by the PCAOB. The request, to the extent
possible, should include, for example:
(i) A copy of the particular inspection report that is the subject
of the request;
(ii) The specific assessments or determinations that are the
subject of the request;
(iii) The alleged errors or deficiencies in the PCAOB's assessments
or determination and the reasons for the firm's position;
(iv) If the matter is being reviewed under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, any actions taken by the registered public accounting firm to
address criticisms or defects identified in the inspection report; and
(v) Any supporting documentation relevant to the review.
(4) The firm must provide a copy of its review request to the PCAOB
simultaneously with its submission to the Commission.
(5) A timely review request by a firm will operate as a stay of
publication of those portions of the final inspection report or
criticisms or defects in the quality control systems of the firm
subject to a determination described in paragraph (b) of this section,
as applicable, that are the subject of the firm's review request,
unless the Commission otherwise determines in its own discretion. Upon
expiration of the 30-day period during which the firm may request
interim Commission review, the PCAOB shall make publicly available the
remainder of the final inspection report or criticisms or defects in
the quality control systems of the firm that were indentified in an
inspection report, as applicable, that are not the subject of the
firm's review request, unless the Commission otherwise determines that
such a result would not be necessary or appropriate.
(6) If the firm fails to make a timely review request, pursuant to
Section 104(g)(2) of the Act, the PCAOB shall make publicly available
the final inspection report or criticisms or defects in the quality
control systems of the firm that were indentified in an inspection
report, as applicable.
(d) Procedures for granting or denying the review request. Within
30 calendar days of a timely review request, the Commission will notify
the firm and the PCAOB as to whether the Commission will exercise its
discretion to grant the request for an interim review. If the
Commission does not grant the review request, the stay of publication
is terminated upon notification to the firm and the PCAOB. If the
Commission does grant the review request, the stay of publication shall
continue unless the Commission determines otherwise in its own
discretion, or unless the firm consents in writing to the PCAOB, with a
copy to the Commission, to earlier publication.
(e) Procedures where a review request has been granted.
(1) Where the Commission has notified the firm and the PCAOB that
it is granting the request for an interim review, the PCAOB may submit
responsive information and documents with the Commission within 15
calendar days of receipt of such notice. The PCAOB must provide a copy
of such information and documents simultaneously to the firm.
(2) During the course of the interim review, the Commission may
request additional information relating to the PCAOB's assessments or
determination under review, and provide a period of up to seven
calendar days to respond to such request, from the PCAOB, the firm, and
any associated person of the firm. The Commission may grant the firm or
the PCAOB a period of up to seven calendar days to respond to any
information obtained pursuant to this paragraph. The firm or the PCAOB,
as applicable, shall provide simultaneously to the other party all
information provided as a result of a request for additional
information or responses thereto. The firm with which any associated
person from whom information is requested shall provide simultaneously
to the PCAOB all information provided as a result of a request for
additional information or responses thereto. If the firm (including any
associated person) or the PCAOB fails to respond timely to a request
from the Commission, such failure may serve as the basis for the
Commission to conclude its review and make a determination adverse to
the non-responsive party.
(3) The Commission, based on the information submitted by the firm,
the PCAOB and any associated persons, shall consider whether the
PCAOB's assessments or determination are arbitrary and capricious, or
otherwise not consistent with the purposes of the Act.
(4) At the conclusion of its review, the Commission shall inform
the firm and the PCAOB in writing that the Commission:
[[Page 47451]]
(i) Does not object to all or part of the assessments or
determination of the PCAOB and the stay of publication is terminated;
or
(ii) Remands to the PCAOB with instructions that the stay of
publication is permanent or that the PCAOB take such other actions as
the Commission deems necessary or appropriate with respect to
publication, including, but not limited to, revising the final
inspection report or determinations before publication.
(5) The review pursuant to this section shall be completed and a
written notice pursuant to this section shall be sent no more than 75
calendar days after notification to the firm and the PCAOB that the
Commission is granting the request for an interim review, unless the
Commission extends the period for good cause.
(f) Treatment of review.
(1) Time periods in this section shall be computed as provided in
the Commission's Rules of Practice, 17 CFR 201.160.
(2) Unless otherwise determined by the Commission, the decision to
grant or deny a review request and the conclusions of the Commission's
review shall be non-public, and the information or documents submitted,
created, or obtained by the Commission or its staff in the course of
the review shall be deemed non-public. Nothing in this rule shall be
construed to impair or limit the ability of any party to request
confidential treatment under the Freedom of Information Act, 15 U.S.C.
7215(b)(5), or any other applicable law.
(3) Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 7214(h)(2), any decision of the
Commission as a result of an interim review with respect to a PCAOB
inspection report, including whether a request for review is granted or
denied, shall not be reviewable under 15 U.S.C. 78y and shall not be
deemed to be ``final agency action'' for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 704.
(4) Any action taken by the Commission relates solely to the
publication of the relevant inspection report and does not affect the
ability of the Commission or PCAOB to take appropriate action.
(g) Designation of address; Representation.
(1) When a registered public accounting firm first submits a
request for interim Commission review, or an associated person first
submits information related to a request, the firm or associated person
shall submit to the Commission, and keep current, an address at which
any notice or other written communication furnished to the firm or
associated person may be sent, a contact name and telephone number
where the firm or associated person may be reached during business
hours and, if represented, the representative's name, business address,
and telephone number.
(2) If the firm, PCAOB, or associated person will be represented by
a representative, the initial submission of that person shall be
accompanied by the notice of appearance required by Sec. 201.102(d).
The other provisions of Sec. 201.102 with respect to representation
before the Commission shall apply.
Sec. 202.11 [Redesignated as Sec. 202.190]
0
7. Redesignate Sec. 202.11 as Sec. 202.190 under Subpart A.
Dated: July 26, 2010.
By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18860 Filed 8-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P