Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 45630-45632 [2010-19011]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
45630
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
September 15, 2010, at the address
listed below.
ADDRESSES: All nominations should be
mailed or delivered to Wanda K. Jones,
Dr.P.H., Executive Secretary, Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee;
C/O Office on Women’s Health;
Department of Health and Human
Services; 200 Independence Avenue,
SW.; Room 712E; Washington,
DC20201. E-mail delivery of
nominations will not be accepted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wanda K. Jones, Dr.P.H.; Department of
Health and Human Services, C/O Office
on Women’s Health; 200 Independence
Avenue, SW.; Room 712E; Washington,
DC 20201; please refer all inquiries to
cfsac@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CFSAC
was established on September 5, 2002.
The Committee was established to
advise, consult with, and make
recommendations to the Secretary,
through the Assistant Secretary for
Health, on a broad range of topics
including (1) the current state of the
knowledge and research about the
epidemiology and risk factors relating to
chronic fatigue syndrome, and
identifying potential opportunities in
these areas; (2) current and proposed
diagnosis and treatment methods for
chronic fatigue syndrome; and (3)
development and implementation of
programs to inform the public, health
care professionals, and the biomedical,
academic, and research communities
about chronic fatigue syndrome
advances.
Nominations
The Office on Women’s Health is
requesting nominations to future
committee member vacancies for the
CFSAC. The positions are scheduled to
become vacant on April 1, 2011. The
Committee is composed of seven
scientists with demonstrated expertise
in biomedical research and four
individuals with demonstrated expertise
in health services, insurance, or
voluntary organizations concerned with
the problems of individuals with CFS.
The vacant positions include the
biomedical research and health services
categories.
Individuals selected for appointment
to the Committee will serve as voting
members. Individuals selected for
appointment to the Committee can be
invited to serve terms of up to four
years. Committee members receive a
stipend for attending Committee
meetings and conducting other business
in the interest of the Committee.
Committee members also are authorized
to receive per diem and reimbursement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
for travel expenses incurred for
conducting Committee business. To
qualify for consideration of appointment
to the Committee, an individual must
possess demonstrated experience and
expertise in the designated fields or
disciplines, as well as expert knowledge
of the broad issues and topics pertinent
to chronic fatigue syndrome.
Nominations should be typewritten,
and the original nomination and three
copies submitted in one package. The
following information must be part of
the package submitted for each
individual being nominated for
consideration: (1) A letter of nomination
that clearly states the name and
affiliation of the nominee, the basis for
the nomination (i.e., specific attributes
which qualify the nominee for service in
this capacity), and a statement that the
nominee is willing to serve as a member
of the Committee; (2) the nominator’s
name, address, and daytime telephone
number, and the home and/or work
address, telephone number, and e-mail
address of the individual being
nominated; and (3) a current copy of the
nominee’s curriculum vitae. Federal
employees should not be nominated for
consideration of appointment to this
Committee.
The Department makes every effort to
ensure that the membership of HHS
Federal advisory committees is fairly
balanced in terms of points of view
represented and the committee’s
function. Every effort is made to ensure
that a broad representation of
geographic areas, females, ethnic and
minority groups, and people with
disabilities are given consideration for
membership on HHS Federal advisory
committees. Appointment to this
Committee shall be made without
discrimination on the basis of age, race,
ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation,
disability, and cultural, religious, or
socioeconomic status. Nominations
must state that the nominee is willing to
serve as a member of CFSAC and
appears to have no conflict of interest
that would preclude membership.
Potential candidates are required to
provide detailed information concerning
such matters as financial holdings,
consultancies, and research grants or
contracts to permit evaluation of
possible sources of conflict of interest.
Dated: July 28, 2010.
Wanda K. Jones,
Designated Federal Officer, Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–19025 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–42–P
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: Survey of State Underage
Drinking Prevention Policies and
Practices—New
The Sober Truth on Preventing
Underage Drinking Act (the ‘‘STOP
Act’’) 1 states that the ‘‘Secretary [of
Health and Human Services] shall
* * * annually issue a report on each
State’s performance in enacting,
enforcing, and creating laws,
regulations, and programs to prevent or
reduce underage drinking.’’ The
Secretary has delegated responsibility
for this report to SAMHSA. Therefore,
SAMHSA is developing a Survey of
State Underage Drinking Prevention
Policies and Practices (the ‘‘State
Survey’’) to provide input for an Annual
Report on State Underage Drinking
Prevention and Enforcement Activities
(the ‘‘State Report’’).
The STOP Act also requires the
Secretary to develop ‘‘a set of measures
to be used in preparing the report on
best practices’’ and to consider
categories including but not limited to
the following:
Category #1: Sixteen specific
underage drinking laws/regulations
enacted at the State level (e.g., laws
prohibiting sales to minors; laws related
to minors in possession of alcohol);
Category #2: Enforcement and
educational programs to promote
compliance with these laws/regulations;
Category #3: Programs targeted to
youths, parents, and caregivers to deter
underage drinking and the number of
individuals served by these programs;
Category #4: The amount that each
State invests, per youth capita, on the
prevention of underage drinking broken
into five categories: (a) Compliance
check programs in retail outlets; (b)
Checkpoints and saturation patrols that
include the goal of reducing and
1 Public Law 109–422. It is assumed Congress
intended to include the District of Columbia as part
of the State Report.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Notices
deterring underage drinking; (c)
Community-based, school-based, and
higher-education-based programs to
prevent underage drinking; (d)
Underage drinking prevention programs
that target youth within the juvenile
justice and child welfare systems; and
(e) Any other State efforts or programs
that target underage drinking.
Congress’ purpose in mandating the
collection of data on State policies and
programs through the State Survey is to
provide policymakers and the public
with currently unavailable but much
needed information regarding State
underage drinking prevention policies
and programs. SAMHSA and other
Federal agencies that have underage
drinking prevention as part of their
mandate will use the results of the State
Survey to inform Federal programmatic
priorities. The information gathered by
the State Survey will also establish a
resource for State agencies and the
general public for assessing policies and
programs in their own State and for
becoming familiar with the programs,
policies, and funding priorities of other
States. It is also consistent with
SAMHSA’s Strategic Initiative,
‘‘Prevention of Substance Abuse and
Mental Illness,’’ which includes the
prevention of underage drinking and is
designed to create prevention prepared
communities where individuals,
families, schools, workplaces, and
communities take action to promote
emotional health and prevent and
reduce mental illness, substance abuse,
and suicide across the lifespan.
Because of the broad scope of data
required by the STOP Act, SAMHSA
will rely on existing data sources where
possible to minimize the survey burden
on the States. SAMHSA will employ
data on State underage drinking policies
from the National Institute on Alcohol
Abuse and Alcoholism’s Alcohol Policy
Information System (APIS), an
authoritative compendium of State
alcohol-related laws. The APIS data will
be augmented by SAMHSA with
original legal research on State laws and
policies addressing underage drinking
to include all of the STOP Act’s
requested laws and regulations
(Category #1 of the four categories
included in the STOP Act, as described
above, page 2).
The STOP Act mandates that the State
Survey assess ‘‘best practices’’ and
emphasize the importance of building
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
45631
collaborations with Federally
Recognized Tribal Governments (‘‘Tribal
Governments’’). It also emphasizes the
importance at the Federal level of
promoting interagency collaboration
and to that end established the
Interagency Coordinating Committee on
the Prevention of Underage Drinking
(ICCPUD). SAMHSA has determined
that to fulfill the Congressional intent, it
is critical that the State Survey gather
information from the States regarding
the best practices standards that they
apply to their underage drinking
programs, collaborations between States
and Tribal Governments, and the
development of State-level interagency
collaborations similar to ICCPUD.
SAMHSA has determined that data on
Categories #2, #3, and #4 mandated in
the STOP Act (as listed on page 2)
(enforcement and educational programs;
programs targeting youth, parents, and
caregivers; and State expenditures) as
well as States’ best practices standards,
collaborations with Tribal Governments,
and State-level interagency
collaborations are not available from
secondary sources and therefore must be
collected from the States themselves.
The State Survey will therefore be
necessary to fulfill the Congressional
mandate found in the STOP Act.
The State Survey is a single document
that is divided into four sections, as
follows:
(1) Enforcement of underage drinking
prevention laws;
(2) Underage drinking prevention
programs, including data on State best
practices standards and collaborations
with Tribal Governments;
(3) State interagency collaborations
used to implement the above programs;
and
(4) Estimates of the State funds
invested in the categories specified in
the STOP Act (see description of
Category #4, above, page 2) and
descriptions of any dedicated fees, taxes
or fines used to raise these funds.
The number of questions in each
Section is as follows:
Section 1: 29 questions.
Section 2A: 18 questions.2
Section 2B: 6 questions.3
Section 2C: 6 questions.
Section 3: 12 questions.
Section 4: 19 questions.
Total: 90 Questions.
It is anticipated that respondents will
actually respond to only a subset of this
total. This is because the survey is
designed with ‘‘skip logic,’’ which
means that many questions will only be
directed to a subset of respondents who
report the existence of particular
programs or activities.
To ensure that the State Survey
obtains the necessary data while
minimizing the burden on the States,
SAMHSA has conducted a lengthy and
comprehensive planning process. It has
sought advice from key stakeholders (as
mandated by the STOP Act) including
hosting an all-day stakeholders meeting,
conducting two field tests with State
officials likely to be responsible for
completing the State Survey, and
investigating and testing various State
Survey formats, online delivery systems,
and data collection methodologies.
Based on these investigations,
SAMHSA has decided to collect the
required data using an online survey
instrument over an 8-week period. The
State Survey will be sent to each State
Governor’s office and the Office of the
Mayor of the District of Columbia, for a
total of 51 survey respondents. Based on
the feedback received from stakeholders
and field pilot testers, it is anticipated
that the State Governors will designate
staff from State agencies that have
access to the requested data (typically
State Alcohol Beverage Control [ABC]
agencies and State Substance Abuse
Program agencies). SAMHSA will
provide both telephone and online
technical support to State agency staff
and will emphasize that the States are
only expected to provide data that is
readily available and are not required to
provide data that has not already been
collected. The burden estimate below
takes into account these assumptions.
The estimated annual response
burden to collect this information is as
follows:
2 Note that the number of questions in Sections
2A is an estimate. This Section asks States to
identify their programs that are specific to underage
drinking prevention. For each program identified
there are six follow-up questions. Based on
feedback from stakeholders and pilot testers, it is
anticipated that States will report an average of
three programs for a total of 18 questions.
3 Note that the number of questions in Section 2B
is an estimate. This Section asks States to identify
their programs that are related to underage drinking
prevention. For each program identified there are
two follow-up questions. Based on feedback from
stakeholders and pilot testers, it is anticipated that
States will report an average of three such programs
for a total of six questions.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
45632
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 3, 2010 / Notices
Instrument
Number of
respondents
Responses/
respondent
Burden/
response (hrs)
Annual
burden
(hrs)
State Questionnaire .........................................................................................
51
1
17.7
902.7
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by September 2, 2010 to:
SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human
Resources and Housing Branch, Office
of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503; due to potential
delays in OMB’s receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal
Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202–395–
5806.
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
Description: Section 466(a)(17) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) requires
States to establish procedures under
which the State Child Support
Enforcement IV–D agencies shall enter
into agreements with financial
institutions doing business in States for
the purpose of securing information
leading to the enforcement of child
support orders. Under 452(l) and
466(a)(17)(A)(i) of the Act, the Secretary
may aid State agencies conducting data
matches with financial institutions
doing business in multiple States by
centrally matching through the Federal
Parent Locator Service.
Respondents: Financial institutions
doing business in two or more States.
[FR Doc. 2010–19011 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects:
Title: Financial Institution Data
Match.
OMB No.: 0970–0196.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Financial Data Match Result File .....................................................................
Election Form ...................................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 402.88.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. E-mail address:
infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests
should be identified by the title of the
information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Aug 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
259
122
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Dated: July 29, 2010.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–19009 Filed 8–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0382]
Animal Drug User Fee Rates and
Payment Procedures for Fiscal Year
2011
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Notice.
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Average
burden
hours per
response
4
1
0.33
0.50
341.88
10.2
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
rates and payment procedures for fiscal
year (FY) 2011 animal drug user fees.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act), as amended by the Animal
Drug User Fee Act of 2003 (ADUFA) and
the Animal Drug User Fee Amendments
of 2008 (ADUFA II), authorizes FDA to
collect user fees for certain animal drug
applications and supplements, on
certain animal drug products, on certain
establishments where such products are
made, and on certain sponsors of such
animal drug applications and/or
investigational animal drug
submissions. This notice establishes the
fee rates for FY 2011.
SUMMARY:
Visit
FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrug
UserFeeActADUFA/default.htm or
contact Lisa Kable, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–10), Food and Drug
Administration, 7529 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9718.
For general questions, you may also email the Center for Veterinary Medicine
(CVM) at: cvmadufa@fda.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4703
Total
burden
hours
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 148 (Tuesday, August 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45630-45632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-19011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Survey of State Underage Drinking Prevention Policies and
Practices--New
The Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking Act (the ``STOP
Act'') \1\ states that the ``Secretary [of Health and Human Services]
shall * * * annually issue a report on each State's performance in
enacting, enforcing, and creating laws, regulations, and programs to
prevent or reduce underage drinking.'' The Secretary has delegated
responsibility for this report to SAMHSA. Therefore, SAMHSA is
developing a Survey of State Underage Drinking Prevention Policies and
Practices (the ``State Survey'') to provide input for an Annual Report
on State Underage Drinking Prevention and Enforcement Activities (the
``State Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 109-422. It is assumed Congress intended to
include the District of Columbia as part of the State Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The STOP Act also requires the Secretary to develop ``a set of
measures to be used in preparing the report on best practices'' and to
consider categories including but not limited to the following:
Category #1: Sixteen specific underage drinking laws/regulations
enacted at the State level (e.g., laws prohibiting sales to minors;
laws related to minors in possession of alcohol);
Category #2: Enforcement and educational programs to promote
compliance with these laws/regulations;
Category #3: Programs targeted to youths, parents, and caregivers
to deter underage drinking and the number of individuals served by
these programs;
Category #4: The amount that each State invests, per youth capita,
on the prevention of underage drinking broken into five categories: (a)
Compliance check programs in retail outlets; (b) Checkpoints and
saturation patrols that include the goal of reducing and
[[Page 45631]]
deterring underage drinking; (c) Community-based, school-based, and
higher-education-based programs to prevent underage drinking; (d)
Underage drinking prevention programs that target youth within the
juvenile justice and child welfare systems; and (e) Any other State
efforts or programs that target underage drinking.
Congress' purpose in mandating the collection of data on State
policies and programs through the State Survey is to provide
policymakers and the public with currently unavailable but much needed
information regarding State underage drinking prevention policies and
programs. SAMHSA and other Federal agencies that have underage drinking
prevention as part of their mandate will use the results of the State
Survey to inform Federal programmatic priorities. The information
gathered by the State Survey will also establish a resource for State
agencies and the general public for assessing policies and programs in
their own State and for becoming familiar with the programs, policies,
and funding priorities of other States. It is also consistent with
SAMHSA's Strategic Initiative, ``Prevention of Substance Abuse and
Mental Illness,'' which includes the prevention of underage drinking
and is designed to create prevention prepared communities where
individuals, families, schools, workplaces, and communities take action
to promote emotional health and prevent and reduce mental illness,
substance abuse, and suicide across the lifespan.
Because of the broad scope of data required by the STOP Act, SAMHSA
will rely on existing data sources where possible to minimize the
survey burden on the States. SAMHSA will employ data on State underage
drinking policies from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism's Alcohol Policy Information System (APIS), an authoritative
compendium of State alcohol-related laws. The APIS data will be
augmented by SAMHSA with original legal research on State laws and
policies addressing underage drinking to include all of the STOP Act's
requested laws and regulations (Category 1 of the four
categories included in the STOP Act, as described above, page 2).
The STOP Act mandates that the State Survey assess ``best
practices'' and emphasize the importance of building collaborations
with Federally Recognized Tribal Governments (``Tribal Governments'').
It also emphasizes the importance at the Federal level of promoting
interagency collaboration and to that end established the Interagency
Coordinating Committee on the Prevention of Underage Drinking (ICCPUD).
SAMHSA has determined that to fulfill the Congressional intent, it is
critical that the State Survey gather information from the States
regarding the best practices standards that they apply to their
underage drinking programs, collaborations between States and Tribal
Governments, and the development of State-level interagency
collaborations similar to ICCPUD.
SAMHSA has determined that data on Categories 2,
3, and 4 mandated in the STOP Act (as listed on page
2) (enforcement and educational programs; programs targeting youth,
parents, and caregivers; and State expenditures) as well as States'
best practices standards, collaborations with Tribal Governments, and
State-level interagency collaborations are not available from secondary
sources and therefore must be collected from the States themselves. The
State Survey will therefore be necessary to fulfill the Congressional
mandate found in the STOP Act.
The State Survey is a single document that is divided into four
sections, as follows:
(1) Enforcement of underage drinking prevention laws;
(2) Underage drinking prevention programs, including data on State
best practices standards and collaborations with Tribal Governments;
(3) State interagency collaborations used to implement the above
programs; and
(4) Estimates of the State funds invested in the categories
specified in the STOP Act (see description of Category 4,
above, page 2) and descriptions of any dedicated fees, taxes or fines
used to raise these funds.
The number of questions in each Section is as follows:
Section 1: 29 questions.
Section 2A: 18 questions.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Note that the number of questions in Sections 2A is an
estimate. This Section asks States to identify their programs that
are specific to underage drinking prevention. For each program
identified there are six follow-up questions. Based on feedback from
stakeholders and pilot testers, it is anticipated that States will
report an average of three programs for a total of 18 questions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2B: 6 questions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Note that the number of questions in Section 2B is an
estimate. This Section asks States to identify their programs that
are related to underage drinking prevention. For each program
identified there are two follow-up questions. Based on feedback from
stakeholders and pilot testers, it is anticipated that States will
report an average of three such programs for a total of six
questions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2C: 6 questions.
Section 3: 12 questions.
Section 4: 19 questions.
Total: 90 Questions.
It is anticipated that respondents will actually respond to only a
subset of this total. This is because the survey is designed with
``skip logic,'' which means that many questions will only be directed
to a subset of respondents who report the existence of particular
programs or activities.
To ensure that the State Survey obtains the necessary data while
minimizing the burden on the States, SAMHSA has conducted a lengthy and
comprehensive planning process. It has sought advice from key
stakeholders (as mandated by the STOP Act) including hosting an all-day
stakeholders meeting, conducting two field tests with State officials
likely to be responsible for completing the State Survey, and
investigating and testing various State Survey formats, online delivery
systems, and data collection methodologies.
Based on these investigations, SAMHSA has decided to collect the
required data using an online survey instrument over an 8-week period.
The State Survey will be sent to each State Governor's office and the
Office of the Mayor of the District of Columbia, for a total of 51
survey respondents. Based on the feedback received from stakeholders
and field pilot testers, it is anticipated that the State Governors
will designate staff from State agencies that have access to the
requested data (typically State Alcohol Beverage Control [ABC] agencies
and State Substance Abuse Program agencies). SAMHSA will provide both
telephone and online technical support to State agency staff and will
emphasize that the States are only expected to provide data that is
readily available and are not required to provide data that has not
already been collected. The burden estimate below takes into account
these assumptions.
The estimated annual response burden to collect this information is
as follows:
[[Page 45632]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Burden/ Annual burden
Instrument respondents respondent response (hrs) (hrs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Questionnaire......................... 51 1 17.7 902.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by September 2, 2010 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-5806.
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-19011 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
