Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 45095-45096 [2010-18929]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
45095
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 147 / Monday, August 2, 2010 / Notices
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters.2 If the interested party
intends for the Secretary to review sales
of merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Please note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to section
351.303(f)(3)(ii) of the Department’s
regulations.
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department
has clarified its practice with respect to
the collection of final antidumping
duties on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration Web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov.
Six copies of the request should be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. The Department
also asks parties to serve a copy of their
requests to the Office of Antidumping/
Countervailing Operations, Attention:
Sheila Forbes, in room 3065 of the main
Commerce Building. Further, in
accordance with section 351.303(f)(l)(i)
of the Department’s regulations, a copy
of each request must be served on every
party on the Department’s service list.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of August 2010. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of August 2010, a request for review
of entries covered by an order, finding,
or suspended investigation listed in this
notice and for the period identified
above, the Department will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping or countervailing
duties on those entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of (or bond for)
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable for the POR.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: July 27, 2010.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–18936 Filed 7–30–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for
September 2010
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in September
2010 and will appear in that month’s
Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset
Reviews.
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from South Korea (A–580–807) (3rd Review) ...........................................................
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Japan (A–588–702) (3rd Review) ......................................................................
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from South Korea (A–580–813) (3rd Review) ...........................................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan (A–583–816) (3rd Review) ....................................................................
2 If the review request involves a non-market
economy and the parties subject to the review
request do not qualify for separate rates, all other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jul 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
exporters of subject merchandise from the nonmarket economy country who do not have a
separate rate will be covered by the review as part
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dana Mermelstein
(202) 482–1391.
Dana Mermelstein
(202) 482–1391.
Dana Mermelstein
(202) 482–1391.
Dana Mermelstein
(202) 482–1391.
of the single entity of which the named firms are
a part.
E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
02AUN1
45096
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 147 / Monday, August 2, 2010 / Notices
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
No Sunset Review of countervailing
duty orders is scheduled for initiation in
September 2010.
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
Suspended Investigations
Foreign–Trade Zone 138 - Columbus,
Ohio Area, Application for
Reorganization under Alternative Site
Framework
No Sunset Review of suspended
investigations is scheduled for initiation
in September 2010.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
Sunset Reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—
Policies Regarding the Conduct of Fiveyear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy
Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998).
The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further
information regarding what is required
of all parties to participate in Sunset
Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–18929 Filed 7–30–10; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jul 30, 2010
Jkt 220001
(Docket 46–2010)
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign–Trade Zones (FTZ) Board
(the Board) by the Columbus Regional
Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 138,
requesting authority to reorganize the
zone under the alternative site
framework (ASF) adopted by the Board
(74 FR 1170, 1/12/09; correction 74 FR
3987, 1/22/09). The ASF is an option for
grantees for the establishment or
reorganization of general–purpose zones
and can permit significantly greater
flexibility in the designation of new
‘‘usage–driven’’ FTZ sites for operators/
users located within a grantee’s ‘‘service
area’’ in the context of the Board’s
standard 2,000–acre activation limit for
a general–purpose zone project. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the Foreign–Trade Zones Act, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the
regulations of the Board (15 CFR part
400). It was formally filed on July 21,
2010.
FTZ 138 was approved on March 13,
1987 (Board Order 351, 52 FR 9319, 3/
24/87) and expanded on February 23,
1994 (Board Order 685, 59 FR 10783, 3/
8/94), on November 9, 1999 (Board
Order 1063, 64 FR 63786, 11/22/99), on
May 29, 2001 (Board Order 1166, 66 FR
32933, 6/19/01), on December 19, 2003
(Board Order 1311, 69 FR 49, 1/2/04)
and on November 2, 2007 (Board Order
1530, 72 FR 65563; 11/21/07).
The general–purpose zone currently
consists of the following sites: Site 1
(3,787 acres total) -- portions of the
Rickenbacker Inland Port - includes
certain acreage within the Rickenbacker
International Airport and Air Industrial
Park, Alum Creek East Industrial Park,
Alum Creek West Industrial Park, and
Groveport Commerce Center, Franklin
County; Site 2 (136 acres) -- Gateway
Business Park, McClain Road, Lima,
Allen County; Site 3 (42 acres) -- within
the 90–acre Gateway Interchange
Industrial Park, State Route 104 and
U.S. Route 35, Chillicothe, Ross County;
Site 4 (64 acres, 2 parcels) -- within the
960–acre Rock Mill Industrial Park,
south of Mill Park Drive, Lancaster,
Fairfield County; Site 5 (133 acres) -within the 149–acre D.O. Hall Business
Center, State Route 660 and north of
Reitler Road, Cambridge, Guernsey
County; Site 6 (74 acres, 2 parcels) -within the Eagleton Industrial Park,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State Route 142 and west of Spring
Valley Road, London, Madison County;
Site 12 (31 acres) -- Marion Industrial
Park, 1110 Cheney Avenue, Marion,
Marion County; Site 13 (41 acres) -Capital Park South, 3125–3325 Lewis
Centre Way, Grove City, Franklin
County; Site 14 (27 acres) -- Southpointe
Industrial Park, 3901 Gantz Road, Grove
City, Franklin County; Site 15 (50 acres,
sunset 12/31/2011) -- Columbus
Industrial District, located at 4545
Fisher Road, Columbus, Franklin
County; Site 16 (74 acres, expires 9/1/
2010) -- located at 1809 Wilson Road,
Columbus, Franklin County; Site 17 (9
acres, expires 7/31/2011) -- Quarry East
Commerce Center (Drew Shoe
Company), located at 252 Quarry Drive,
Lancaster, Fairfield County; Site 18 (22
acres, expires 9/1/2010) -- located at 700
Manor Park, Columbus, Franklin
County; and, Site 19 (1 acre, expires 9/
1/2010) -- located at 330 Oak Street,
Columbus, Franklin County.
The grantee’s proposed service area
under the ASF would be Athens,
Champaign, Clark, Coshocton,
Crawford, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin,
Guernsey, Highland, Hocking, Knox,
Licking, Logan, Madison, Marion,
Morrow, Muskingum, Perry, Pickaway,
Pike, Ross, Union, Vinton and Wyandot
Counties, Ohio, as described in the
application. If approved, the grantee
would be able to serve sites throughout
the service area based on companies’
needs for FTZ designation. The
proposed service area is within and
adjacent to the Columbus Customs and
Border Protection port of entry. The
grantee also proposes to retain its
existing site (Site 2) in Lima (Allen
County).
The applicant is requesting authority
to reorganize its existing zone project to
include Sites 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 15 as
‘‘magnet’’ sites and Sites 13, 14, 16, 17
and 18 as ‘‘usage–driven’’ sites. The ASF
allows for the possible exemption of one
magnet site from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits
that generally apply to sites under the
ASF, and the applicant proposes that
Site 1 be so exempted. The applicant is
also requesting authority to remove 193
acres of undeveloped land from Site 1
(Alum Creek West Industrial Park), to
remove 41 acres from Site 2, to delete
Site 3 in its entirety, to remove 29 acres
from Site 4, to remove 6 acres from Site
6, to remove 33 acres from Site 13, to
remove 20 acres from Site 14, and to
delete Site 19 in its entirety. Because the
ASF only pertains to establishing or
reorganizing a general–purpose zone,
the application would have no impact
on FTZ 138’s authorized subzones.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Claudia Hausler of the FTZ
E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
02AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 147 (Monday, August 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45095-45096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18929]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for September 2010
The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in
September 2010 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of
Five-Year Sunset Reviews.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department contact
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from Dana Mermelstein
South Korea (A-580-807) (3rd Review). (202) 482-1391.
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings Dana Mermelstein
from Japan (A-588-702) (3rd Review). (202) 482-1391.
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings Dana Mermelstein
from South Korea (A-580-813) (3rd Review). (202) 482-1391.
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings Dana Mermelstein
from Taiwan (A-583-816) (3rd Review). (202) 482-1391.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45096]]
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
No Sunset Review of countervailing duty orders is scheduled for
initiation in September 2010.
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for
initiation in September 2010.
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical
issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set
forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the
Conduct of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16,
1998). The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews
provides further information regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: July 20, 2010.
Edward C. Yang,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-18929 Filed 7-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
