Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 43921-43922 [2010-18391]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices
doctm/tmcal.html) and other Internet
Web sites, press releases to general and
trade media, direct mail, notices by
industry trade associations and other
multiplier groups, and publicity at
industry meetings, symposia,
conferences, and trade shows.
Recruitment for the mission will
begin immediately and conclude no
later than September 15, 2010. The U.S.
Department of Commerce will review all
applications immediately after the
deadline. We will inform applicants of
selection decisions as soon as possible
after September 15, 2010. Applications
received after that date will be
considered only if space and scheduling
constraints permit.
Contacts
U.S. Commercial Service Domestic
Contact: Sean Timmins, 202–482–1841,
Sean.Timmins@trade.gov.
U.S. Commercial Service Saudi
Arabia Contacts: Mr. Habeeb Saeed, U.S.
Commercial Service Riyadh, Tel: 966–
1–488–3800,
Habeeb.Saeed@mail.doc.gov.
Mr. Ishtiaq Hussain, U.S. Commercial
Service Dhahran, Tel: 966–3–330–3200,
Ishtiaq.Hussain@mail.doc.gov.
Natalia Susak,
Global Trade Programs, Commercial Service
Trade Missions Program.
[FR Doc. 2010–17742 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–833]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 5, 2010, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain polyester staple fiber from
Taiwan. The period of review is May 1,
2008, through April 30, 2009. We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results. We
received comments from Far Eastern
Textile Limited. The final weightedaverage dumping margin for Far Eastern
Textile Limited is listed below in the
‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of
this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: July 27, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael A. Romani or Richard
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Rimlinger, AD/CVD Operations, Office
5, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0198 or
(202) 482–4477, respectively.
Background
On February 5, 2010, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber (PSF) from
Taiwan. See Certain Polyester Staple
Fiber From Taiwan: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 5964 (February 5, 2010)
(Preliminary Results). We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received
comments from the respondent. The
Department has conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
PSF. PSF is defined as synthetic staple
fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise
processed for spinning, of polyesters
measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier,
inclusive) or more in diameter. This
merchandise is cut to lengths varying
from one inch (25 mm) to five inches
(127 mm). The merchandise subject to
the order may be coated, usually with a
silicon or other finish, or not coated.
PSF is generally used as stuffing in
sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets,
comforters, cushions, pillows, and
furniture. Merchandise of less than 3.3
decitex (less than 3 denier) currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
at subheading 5503.20.00.20 is
specifically excluded from the order.
Also specifically excluded from the
order are polyester staple fibers of 10 to
18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to
8 inches (fibers used in the manufacture
of carpeting). In addition, low-melt PSF
is excluded from the order. Low-melt
PSF is defined as a bi-component fiber
with an outer sheath that melts at a
significantly lower temperature than its
inner core.
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable in the HTSUS at
subheadings 5503.20.00.45 and
5503.20.00.65. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43921
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by
parties to this review are addressed in
the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’
from Edward C. Yang, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary,
dated July 19, 2010 (Decision
Memorandum), and hereby adopted by
this notice. A list of the issues which
parties have raised and to which we
have responded is in the Decision
Memorandum and attached to this
notice as an Appendix. The Decision
Memorandum, which is a public
document, is on file in the Department’s
Central Records Unit of the main
Commerce building, Room 1117, and is
accessible on the Web at https://
trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Ministerial Errors
In the Preliminary Results, we
indicated that we had matched products
sold in the United States with identical
products sold in the home market. In
fact, in our calculation for the
Preliminary Results, one product sold in
the United States did not match to an
above-cost, contemporaneous,
physically identical product sold in the
home market in the ordinary course of
trade. Instead, from the pool of homemarket sales that passed the cost-ofproduction test, we had selected for
comparison purposes the product sold
in the home market with the most
similar physical characteristics to the
product sold in the United States. For
this comparison, we made a differencesin-merchandise adjustment to normal
value.
In the Preliminary Results we stated
erroneously that the preliminary margin
we had found for the respondent was
2.11 percent; the correct margin
resulting from our preliminary
calculations was 2.43 percent. See
‘‘Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from
Taiwan: Far Eastern Textile Limited
Analysis Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of the
Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order (5/1/08–4/30/
09)’’ dated February 1, 2010.
We received no comments from
parties concerning these inadvertent
errors in the Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
We have made no changes to our
calculations and, as announced in the
Preliminary Results, we disregarded
sales made at prices below the cost of
production in the home market when
determining normal value in this
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
43922
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Notices
administrative review. As a result of our
review, we determine that a weightedaverage dumping margin of 2.43 percent
exists for Far Eastern Textile Limited for
the period May 1, 2008, through April
30, 2009.
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. Although Far
Eastern Textile Limited indicated that it
was not the importer of record for any
of its sales to the United States during
the period of review, it reported the
names of the importers of record for all
of its U.S. sales. Because Far Eastern
Textile Limited also reported the
entered value for all of its U.S. sales, we
have calculated importer-specific
assessment rates for the merchandise in
question by aggregating the dumping
margins we calculated for all U.S. sales
to each importer and dividing this
amount by the total entered value of
those sales.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
Far Eastern Textile Limited for which it
did not know its merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after publication of these final
results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of PSF from Taiwan entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cashdeposit rate for Far Eastern Textile
Limited will be 2.43 percent; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in the original less-thanfair-value investigation or previous
reviews, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:30 Jul 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 7.31
percent, the all-others rate established
in Notice of Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Certain Polyester Staple
Fiber From the Republic of Korea and
Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber From the
Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 65 FR
33807 (May 25, 2000). These cashdeposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: July 19, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
1. Exchange Rates.
2. Selection of Normal Value.
[FR Doc. 2010–18391 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2010–0067]
Interim Guidance for Determining
Subject Matter Eligibility for Process
Claims in View of Bilski v. Kappos
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; Request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) has
prepared Interim Guidance for
Determining Subject Matter Eligibility
for Process Claims in view of Bilski v.
Kappos (Interim Bilski Guidance) for its
personnel to use when determining
subject matter eligibility under 35
U.S.C. 101 in view of the recent
decision by the United States Supreme
Court (Supreme Court) in Bilski v.
Kappos, No. 08–964 (June 28, 2010). It
is intended to be used by Office
personnel as a supplement to the
previously issued Interim Examination
Instructions for Evaluating Subject
Matter Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. 101
dated August 24, 2009 (Interim
Instructions) and the memorandum to
the Patent Examining Corps on the
Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v.
Kappos dated June 28, 2010. This
guidance supersedes previous guidance
on subject matter eligibility that
conflicts with the Interim Bilski
Guidance. Any member of the public
may submit written comments on the
Interim Bilski Guidance. The Office is
especially interested in receiving
comments regarding the scope and
extent of the holding in Bilski.
DATES: The Interim Bilski Guidance is
effective July 27, 2010. This guidance
applies to all applications filed before,
on or after the effective date of July 27,
2010.
Comment Deadline Date: To be
ensured of consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
September 27, 2010. No public hearing
will be held.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
Interim Bilski Guidance should be sent
by electronic mail message over the
Internet addressed to
Bilski_Guidance@uspto.gov or facsimile
transmitted to (571) 273–0125.
Comments may also be submitted by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450. Although comments may
be submitted by facsimile or mail, the
Office prefers to receive comments via
the Internet.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43921-43922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18391]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-833]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On February 5, 2010, the Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from Taiwan. The period of
review is May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009. We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. We
received comments from Far Eastern Textile Limited. The final weighted-
average dumping margin for Far Eastern Textile Limited is listed below
in the ``Final Results of the Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: July 27, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael A. Romani or Richard
Rimlinger, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482-0198 or (202) 482-4477, respectively.
Background
On February 5, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain polyester staple fiber (PSF) from
Taiwan. See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 5964 (February
5, 2010) (Preliminary Results). We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results. We received comments from the
respondent. The Department has conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is PSF. PSF is defined as
synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for
spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or
more in diameter. This merchandise is cut to lengths varying from one
inch (25 mm) to five inches (127 mm). The merchandise subject to the
order may be coated, usually with a silicon or other finish, or not
coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing in sleeping bags, mattresses,
ski jackets, comforters, cushions, pillows, and furniture. Merchandise
of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3 denier) currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at
subheading 5503.20.00.20 is specifically excluded from the order. Also
specifically excluded from the order are polyester staple fibers of 10
to 18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8 inches (fibers used in
the manufacture of carpeting). In addition, low-melt PSF is excluded
from the order. Low-melt PSF is defined as a bi-component fiber with an
outer sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature than its
inner core.
The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable in
the HTSUS at subheadings 5503.20.00.45 and 5503.20.00.65. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to this review are
addressed in the ``Issues and Decision Memorandum'' from Edward C.
Yang, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy
Assistant Secretary, dated July 19, 2010 (Decision Memorandum), and
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have
raised and to which we have responded is in the Decision Memorandum and
attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Decision Memorandum, which
is a public document, is on file in the Department's Central Records
Unit of the main Commerce building, Room 1117, and is accessible on the
Web at https://trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and electronic version of
the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Ministerial Errors
In the Preliminary Results, we indicated that we had matched
products sold in the United States with identical products sold in the
home market. In fact, in our calculation for the Preliminary Results,
one product sold in the United States did not match to an above-cost,
contemporaneous, physically identical product sold in the home market
in the ordinary course of trade. Instead, from the pool of home-market
sales that passed the cost-of-production test, we had selected for
comparison purposes the product sold in the home market with the most
similar physical characteristics to the product sold in the United
States. For this comparison, we made a differences-in-merchandise
adjustment to normal value.
In the Preliminary Results we stated erroneously that the
preliminary margin we had found for the respondent was 2.11 percent;
the correct margin resulting from our preliminary calculations was 2.43
percent. See ``Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan: Far Eastern
Textile Limited Analysis Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order (5/1/08-4/30/09)''
dated February 1, 2010.
We received no comments from parties concerning these inadvertent
errors in the Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Review
We have made no changes to our calculations and, as announced in
the Preliminary Results, we disregarded sales made at prices below the
cost of production in the home market when determining normal value in
this
[[Page 43922]]
administrative review. As a result of our review, we determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of 2.43 percent exists for Far Eastern
Textile Limited for the period May 1, 2008, through April 30, 2009.
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Although Far Eastern Textile Limited indicated that it was not
the importer of record for any of its sales to the United States during
the period of review, it reported the names of the importers of record
for all of its U.S. sales. Because Far Eastern Textile Limited also
reported the entered value for all of its U.S. sales, we have
calculated importer-specific assessment rates for the merchandise in
question by aggregating the dumping margins we calculated for all U.S.
sales to each importer and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of those sales.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the period of review produced by Far Eastern Textile
Limited for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6,
2003).
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions directly to
CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review
for all shipments of PSF from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash-deposit rate for
Far Eastern Textile Limited will be 2.43 percent; (2) for merchandise
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in the original less-than-fair-value investigation or previous
reviews, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 7.31 percent, the all-others rate
established in Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of
Korea and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 65 FR 33807 (May 25, 2000). These
cash-deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 19, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
1. Exchange Rates.
2. Selection of Normal Value.
[FR Doc. 2010-18391 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P