Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan, 41804-41808 [2010-17538]
Download as PDF
41804
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices
776(a) and (b) of the Act to find a grant
to Yama under the Xiamen Municipal
Science and Technology Program to be
specific under section 771(5A)(D)(iii) of
the Act. A full discussion of our
decision to apply adverse facts available
is presented in the Decision
Memorandum in the section ‘‘Use of
Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse
Facts Available.’’
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we have
calculated individual rates for Yama
and Changtai Rongshu. Section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that for
companies not investigated, we will
determine an ‘‘all others’’ rate equal to
the weighted–average countervailable
subsidy rates established for exporters
and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis countervailable subsidy rates,
and any rates determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. In this case, the
all others rate is based on Yama’s
calculated rate.
Exporter/manufacturer
Net subsidy rate
Yama Ribbons and
Bows Co., Ltd. ..........
Changtai Rongshu Textile Co., Ltd. ...............
All Others ......................
1.56
117.95
1.56
privileged and business proprietary
information in our files, provided the
ITC confirms that it will not disclose
such information, either publicly or
under an Administrative Protective
Order (‘‘APO’’), without the written
consent of the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
In the event that the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice will serve as the only reminder
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This determination is published
pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of
the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Also, in accordance with section
703(d) of the Act, we instructed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to
discontinue the suspension of
liquidation for countervailing duty
purposes for subject merchandise
entered on or after April 13, 2010, but
to continue the suspension of
liquidation of entries made from
December 14, 2010, through April 12,
2010.
We will issue a countervailing duty
order if the ITC issues a final affirmative
injury determination, and will require a
cash deposit of estimated countervailing
duties for such entries of merchandise
in the amounts indicated above. If the
ITC determines that material injury, or
threat of material injury, does not exist,
this proceeding will be terminated and
all estimated deposits or securities
posted as a result of the suspension of
liquidation will be refunded or
canceled.
APPENDIX
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
final determination. In addition, we are
making available to the ITC all non–
privileged and non–proprietary
information related to this investigation.
We will allow the ITC access to all
Comment 5: Inclusion of Terminated
Programs in the AFA Rate Calculation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jul 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
List of Comments and Issues in the
Decision Memorandum
General Issues
Company–Specific Issues
Comment 2: Xiamen Municipal Science
and Technology Grant Program Specificity
Comment 3: International Market
Developing Fund Grants for SMEs Specificity
Comment 4: Calculation of Yama’s Sales
Denominator
AFA
All–Others Rate
Comment 6: All–Others Rate
Calculation
[FR Doc. 2010–17541 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
International Trade Administration
A–583–844
Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Narrow
Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge
from Taiwan
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: We determine that imports of
narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan are being,
or are likely to be, sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV), as
provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we have made
changes in the margin calculations.
Therefore, the final determination
differs from the preliminary
determination. The final weighted–
average dumping margins for the
investigated companies are listed below
in the section entitled ‘‘Final
Determination Margins.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hector Rodriguez or Holly Phelps, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0629 and (202)
482–0656, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comment 1: Double Counting/
Overlapping Remedies
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Sfmt 4703
Background
On February 18, 2010, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary determination of sales at
LTFV in the antidumping duty
investigation of NWR from Taiwan. See
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge from Taiwan: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 75 FR 7236 (Feb. 18,
2010) (Preliminary Determination).
Since the preliminary determination,
the following events have occurred.
In February 2010, the Department
selected certain unaffiliated companies
which supplied ribbon to Dear Year
Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd. (Dear Year) and
Shienq Houng Group (i.e., Hsien Chan
Enterprise Co., Ltd., Novelty Handicrafts
Co., Ltd., and Shienq Huong Enterprise
Co., Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Shienq Huong’’)),
and we requested that these unaffiliated
suppliers respond to section D of the
questionnaire (i.e., the section relating
to cost of production (COP) and
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices
constructed value) with respect to the
merchandise supplied to Dear Year and
Shienq Huong. In February and March
2010, Dear Year’s unaffiliated supplier
informed the Department that it did not
produce NWR but merely purchased
and resold it, while Shienq Houng’s
unaffiliated ribbon suppliers provided
responses to section D of the
questionnaire.
In March 2010, we verified the
questionnaire responses of three
respondents in this case, Dear Year,
Roung Shu Industry Corporation (Roung
Shu), and Shienq Houng, in accordance
with section 782(i) of the Act. Also in
this month, we received additional
comments on the scope of this
investigation from the petitioner.1
Finally in March 2010, we issued
supplemental questionnaires to Shienq
Huong’s unaffiliated suppliers, and we
received responses to these
supplemental questionnaires in April
2010.
Also in April 2010, Dear Year, Roung
Shu, and the petitioner submitted their
main case briefs (i.e., related to all
issues except those associated with the
responses received from the unaffiliated
suppliers noted above). We also
received rebuttal briefs in April 2010
from the petitioner and the three
respondents. In April 2010, we issued
additional supplemental questionnaires
to Shienq Huong’s unaffiliated
suppliers. We received responses to
these supplemental questionnaires in
April and May 2010.
In May and June 2010, the petitioner,
Dear Year, and Shienq Huong submitted
supplemental case and rebuttal briefs
specifically raising issues with regards
Dear Year’s and Shienq Huong’s
unaffiliated suppliers of NWR.
In June 2010, the petitioner provided
revised scope exclusion language
relating to NWR included in kits. For
further discussion, see the ‘‘Scope
Comments’’ section, below. Also in June
2010, the Department held a public
hearing at the request of the petitioner,
Dear Year, and Shienq Huong.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is
July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise subject to the
investigation is narrow woven ribbons
with woven selvedge, in any length, but
with a width (measured at the narrowest
span of the ribbon) less than or equal to
12 centimeters, composed of, in whole
1 The petitioner in this investigation is Berwick
Offray LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary Lion
Ribbon Company, Inc.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jul 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
or in part, man–made fibers (whether
artificial or synthetic, including but not
limited to nylon, polyester, rayon,
polypropylene, and polyethylene
teraphthalate), metal threads and/or
metalized yarns, or any combination
thereof. Narrow woven ribbons subject
to the investigation may:
• also include natural or other non–
man-made fibers;
• be of any color, style, pattern, or
weave construction, including but
not limited to single–faced satin,
double–faced satin, grosgrain,
sheer, taffeta, twill, jacquard, or a
combination of two or more colors,
styles, patterns, and/or weave
constructions;
• have been subjected to, or composed
of materials that have been
subjected to, various treatments,
including but not limited to dyeing,
printing, foil stamping, embossing,
flocking, coating, and/or sizing;
• have embellishments, including but
´
not limited to applique, fringes,
embroidery, buttons, glitter,
sequins, laminates, and/or adhesive
backing;
• have wire and/or monofilament in,
on, or along the longitudinal edges
of the ribbon;
• have ends of any shape or
dimension, including but not
limited to straight ends that are
perpendicular to the longitudinal
edges of the ribbon, tapered ends,
flared ends or shaped ends, and the
ends of such woven ribbons may or
may not be hemmed;
• have longitudinal edges that are
straight or of any shape, and the
longitudinal edges of such woven
ribbon may or may not be parallel
to each other;
• consist of such ribbons affixed to
like ribbon and/or cut–edge woven
ribbon, a configuration also known
as an ‘‘ornamental trimming;’’
• be wound on spools; attached to a
card; hanked (i.e., coiled or
bundled); packaged in boxes, trays
or bags; or configured as skeins,
balls, bateaus or folds; and/or
• be included within a kit or set such
as when packaged with other
products, including but not limited
to gift bags, gift boxes and/or other
types of ribbon.
Narrow woven ribbons subject to the
investigation include all narrow woven
fabrics, tapes, and labels that fall within
this written description of the scope of
this investigation.
Excluded from the scope of the
investigation are the following:
(1) formed bows composed of narrow
woven ribbons with woven
selvedge;
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41805
(2) ‘‘pull–bows’’ (i.e., an assemblage of
ribbons connected to one another,
folded flat and equipped with a
means to form such ribbons into the
shape of a bow by pulling on a
length of material affixed to such
assemblage) composed of narrow
woven ribbons;
(3) narrow woven ribbons comprised
at least 20 percent by weight of
elastomeric yarn (i.e., filament yarn,
including monofilament, of
synthetic textile material, other
than textured yarn, which does not
break on being extended to three
times its original length and which
returns, after being extended to
twice its original length, within a
period of five minutes, to a length
not greater than one and a half
times its original length as defined
in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS),
Section XI, Note 13) or rubber
thread;
(4) narrow woven ribbons of a kind
used for the manufacture of
typewriter or printer ribbons;
(5) narrow woven labels and apparel
tapes, cut–to-length or cut–toshape, having a length (when
measured across the longest edge–
to-edge span) not exceeding 8
centimeters;
(6) narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge attached to and forming
the handle of a gift bag;
(7) cut–edge narrow woven ribbons
formed by cutting broad woven
fabric into strips of ribbon, with or
without treatments to prevent the
longitudinal edges of the ribbon
from fraying (such as by merrowing,
lamination, sono–bonding, fusing,
gumming or waxing), and with or
without wire running lengthwise
along the longitudinal edges of the
ribbon;
(8) narrow woven ribbons comprised
at least 85 percent by weight of
threads having a denier of 225 or
higher;
(9) narrow woven ribbons constructed
from pile fabrics (i.e., fabrics with a
surface effect formed by tufts or
loops of yarn that stand up from the
body of the fabric) ;
(10) narrow woven ribbon affixed
(including by tying) as a decorative
detail to non–subject merchandise,
such as a gift bag, gift box, gift tin,
greeting card or plush toy, or
affixed (including by tying) as a
decorative detail to packaging
containing non–subject
merchandise;
(11) narrow woven ribbon that is (a)
affixed to non–subject merchandise
as a working component of such
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
41806
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
non–subject merchandise, such as
where narrow woven ribbon
comprises an apparel trimming,
book marker, bag cinch, or part of
an identity card holder, or (b)
affixed (including by tying) to non–
subject merchandise as a working
component that holds or packages
such non–subject merchandise or
attaches packaging or labeling to
such non–subject merchandise,
such as a ‘‘belly band’’ around a pair
of pajamas, a pair of socks or a
blanket;
(12) narrow woven ribbon(s)
comprising a belt attached to and
imported with an item of wearing
apparel, whether or not such belt is
removable from such item of
wearing apparel; and
(13) narrow woven ribbon(s) included
with non–subject merchandise in
kits, such as a holiday ornament
craft kit or a scrapbook kit, in which
the individual lengths of narrow
woven ribbon(s) included in the kit
are each no greater than eight
inches, the aggregate amount of
marrow woven ribbon(s) included
in the kit does not exceed 48 linear
inches, none of the narrow woven
ribbon(s) included in the kit is on
a spool, and the narrow woven
ribbon(s) is only one of multiple
items included in the kit.
The merchandise subject to this
investigation is classifiable under the
HTSUS statistical categories
5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
merchandise also may enter under
subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20;
5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00;
5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10;
5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80
and under statistical categories
5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The
HTSUS statistical categories and
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
merchandise under investigation is
dispositive.
Scope Comments
Prior to the preliminary determination
in this case, we received a request from
certain retailers of NWR that the
Department modify the scope of the
investigation to exclude NWR included
in kits or sets in ‘‘de minimis’’ amounts.
Because of concerns over whether the
proposed scope exclusion language
would be administrable, we declined to
modify the scope in the Preliminary
Determination, and we did not use the
language suggested by these retailers or
the alternative language proposed by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jul 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
petitioner. See Preliminary
Determination, 75 FR at 7240.
Following the preliminary
determination, on March 24, 2010, and
June 3, 2010, the petitioner submitted
additional language for this scope
exclusion. Having determined that the
language contained in the petitioner’s
June 3, 2010, submission is
administrable, we have incorporated
this language in exclusion 13. See the
‘‘Scope of Investigation’’ section, above.
Unaffiliated Supplier Costs
In our Preliminary Determination, we
determined that the companies weaving
the ribbon are the producers of the NWR
subject to this investigation. See
Preliminary Determination, 75 FR at
7242. After analyzing the information
on the record with respect to this issue,
as well as the comments received from
interested parties, we continue to find
that the weaver is the producer of NWR.
See the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (Decision Memorandum)
from Edward C. Yang, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Import Administration, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Deputy Secretary for Import
Administration, dated July 12, 2010, at
Comments 19 and 20 for further
discussion regarding this determination.
As noted above, from February
through May 2010, we received
responses to our requests for cost
information from certain of Dear Year
and Shienq Huong’s unaffiliated
suppliers of purchased ribbon. With
respect to Dear Year, the response from
Dear Year’s supplier revealed that the
supplier did not weave the merchandise
under consideration, but rather it
merely purchased the ribbon from
another company and then resold it to
Dear Year. Because insufficient time
existed to request additional
information from the upstream supplier
prior to the final determination, as facts
available for purposes of the final
determination, we are relying on Dear
Year’s costs of acquisition for the
purchased NWR in lieu of actual
production costs from the weavers as
such information is not contained in the
record of this proceeding. For further
discussion, see Comment 19 in the
Decision Memorandum.
With respect to Shienq Huong’s
unaffiliated suppliers, these companies
provided certain cost information but
informed the Department that they did
not maintain records at a sufficient level
of detail to provide POI product–
specific costs. Because the submitted
costs are not POI product–specific costs,
we are unable to use them in our
analysis for the final determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Therefore, as with Dear Year, as facts
available for purposes of the final
determination, we are relying on Shienq
Huong’s costs of acquisition for the
purchased NWR ribbon costs in lieu of
actual costs of production from the
weaver, as the weaver is unable to
provide such costs on a sufficiently
specific basis for use in the
Department’s calculations. For further
discussion, see Comment 20 in the
Decision Memorandum.
Section 776(a) of the Act provides that
the Department shall apply ‘‘facts
otherwise available’’ if (1) necessary
information is not on the record, or (2)
an interested party or any other person
(A) withholds information that has been
requested, (B) fails to provide
information within the deadlines
established, or in the form and manner
requested by the Department, subject to
subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782
of the Act, (C) significantly impedes a
proceeding, or (D) provides information
that cannot be verified as provided by
section 782(i) of the Act. Here, we lack
information necessary to determine the
unaffiliated suppliers’ actual costs and
must, therefore, rely upon facts
available. Although we appropriately
requested the unaffiliated suppliers’
costs, the suppliers did not maintain
records at a sufficient level of detail to
provide such costs in a manner
sufficiently detailed for use in the
Department’s margin calculations;
therefore, we are relying on the
acquisition prices for purchased ribbon
as facts available because they are
product–specific and constitute the only
useable data available with respect to
purchased ribbon. However, if an
antidumping duty order is issued in this
proceeding, we will require product–
specific costs from unaffiliated
suppliers, if requested. This constitutes
notice to the weavers of NWR that
information must be maintained to
allow the reporting of costs on a
product–specific basis.
Cost of Production
As discussed in the preliminary
determination, we conducted an
investigation to determine whether the
respondents made comparison market
sales of the foreign like product during
the POI at prices below their COP
within the meaning of section 773(b) of
the Act. See Preliminary Determination,
75 FR 7236 (Feb. 18, 2010). For this
final determination, we performed the
cost test following the same
methodology as in the Preliminary
Determination.
We found that 20 percent or more of
each respondent’s sales of a given
product during the POI were at prices
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices
less than the weighted–average COP for
this period. Thus, we determined that
these below–cost sales were made in
‘‘substantial quantities’’ within an
extended period of time and at prices
which did not permit the recovery of all
costs within a reasonable period of time
in the normal course of trade. See
sections 773(b)(1)-(2) of the Act.
Therefore, for purposes of this final
determination, we found that each
respondent made below–cost sales not
in the ordinary course of trade.
Consequently, we disregarded these
sales and used the remaining sales as
the basis for determining normal value
for each respondent pursuant to section
773(b)(1) of the Act.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties in this
investigation are addressed in the
Decision Memorandum, which is
adopted by this notice. Parties can find
a complete discussion of the issues
raised in this investigation and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Central Records Unit, room 1117 of
the main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper
copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of the
comments received and our findings at
verification, we have made certain
changes to the margin calculations. For
a discussion of these changes, see the
‘‘Margin Calculations’’ section of the
Decision Memorandum.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Act, we verified the sales and cost
information submitted by the
respondents for use in our final
determination. We used standard
verification procedures including an
examination of relevant accounting and
production records, and original source
documents provided by the
respondents.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
Pursuant to 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend
liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise from Taiwan, entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jul 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
41807
consumption on or after February 18,
2010, the date of publication of the
preliminary determination in the
Federal Register. CBP shall require a
cash deposit or the posting of a bond
equal to the estimated amount by which
the normal value exceeds the U.S. price
as shown below. These instructions
suspending liquidation will remain in
effect until further notice. For Dear Year
and Shienq Huong, because their
estimated weighted–average final
dumping margins are zero, we are not
directing CBP to suspend liquidation of
entries of NWR produced and exported
by these companies.
Finally, we note that neither Dear
Year nor Shienq Huong has disclosed
for the public record the names of their
unaffiliated suppliers. Therefore, upon
public disclosure of this information to
the Department, we will notify CBP that
Dear Year’s and Shienq Huong’s exports
of merchandise produced by these
unaffiliated suppliers have LTFV
investigation margins of zero and thus
are excluded from any order resulting
from this investigation. Until and unless
such public disclosure is made, we will
notify CBP that all entries of
merchandise produced by Dear Year’s
and Shienq Huong’s unaffiliated
suppliers will be subject to the ‘‘all
others’’ rate established in this
proceeding.
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Shienq Huong Enterprise Co., Ltd./Hsien
Chan Enterprise Co.,
Ltd./Novelty Handicrafts Co., Ltd. ..........
All Others ......................
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, we have notified the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
our final determination. As our final
determination is affirmative, the ITC
will determine within 45 days whether
imports of the subject merchandise are
causing material injury, or threat of
material injury, to an industry in the
United States. If the ITC determines that
material injury or threat of injury does
not exist, the proceeding will be
terminated and all securities posted will
be refunded or canceled. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist,
the Department will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP
to assess antidumping duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
This notice will serve as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
Final Determination Margins
written notification of return/
The weighted–average dumping
destruction of APO materials or
margins are as follows:
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
Weighted–Average with the regulations and the terms of an
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (percent)
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
Dear Year Brothers
Mfg. Co., Ltd. ............
0.00 determination and notice in accordance
with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the
Roung Shu Industry
Corporation ...............
4.37 Act.
0.00
4.37
‘‘All Others’’ Rate
In accordance with section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we have based
the ‘‘All Others’’ rate on the weighted
average of the dumping margins
calculated for the exporters/
manufacturers investigated in this
proceeding. The ‘‘All Others’’ rate is
calculated exclusive of all de minimis
margins and margins based entirely on
AFA.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix Issues in Decision
Memorandum
General Issues
1. Targeted Dumping
2. The Appropriate Unit of Measure On
Which to Base Sales and Cost Data
3. How to Define the Product
Characteristic ‘‘Color’’
4. Display Unit Costs
Company–Specific Issues
5. Date of Shipment for Dear Year
6. Dear Year’s Sales of Traded Goods
7. The Treatment of a Relabeling Billing
Adjustment for Dear Year
8. The Treatment of Dear Year’s
‘‘Combination’’ Ribbons
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
41808
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 137 / Monday, July 19, 2010 / Notices
9. Clerical Error in Dear Year’s
Preliminary Dumping Margin
10. Dear Year’s Sample Sales
11. Reallocation of Variable Overhead
for Dear Year
12. Variables Names in Dear Year’s Cost
Database
13. The Treatment of the Product
Characteristic ‘‘Width’’ for Roung Shu
14. Warranty Expenses for Roung Shu
15. Roung Shu’s Reporting of the Costs
Associated with Different Colors of
NWR
16. Financial Expenses for Roung Shu
17. Financial Expenses for Shienq
Huong
18. Depreciation Expense for Shienq
Huong
Issues Related to Unaffiliated Suppliers
19. Dear Year’s Unaffiliated Suppliers’
Cost of Production (COP)
20. Shienq Huong’s Unaffiliated
Suppliers’ COP
21. Assigning Combination Rates to
Dear Year and Shienq Huong
[FR Doc. 2010–17538 Filed 7–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–952]
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: July 19, 2010.
SUMMARY: On February 18, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published its preliminary
determination of sales at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the antidumping duty
investigation of narrow woven ribbons
with woven selvedge (‘‘narrow woven
ribbons’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We invited interested
parties to comment on our Preliminary
Determination. Based on our analysis of
the comments we received, we have
made changes from the Preliminary
Determination. We determine that
narrow woven ribbons from the PRC are
being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at LTFV as provided in
1 See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 75 FR 7244 (February 18, 2010)
(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jul 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘Act’’). The final dumping
margins for this investigation are listed
in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’
section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Zhulieta Willbrand or Karine Gziryan,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3147 and (202)
482–4081, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Case History
The period of investigation is January
1, 2009, through June 30, 2009. The
Department published its preliminary
determination of sales at LTFV and
postponement of the final determination
on February 18, 2010.2 As explained in
the memorandum from the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, the Department has
exercised its discretion to toll deadlines
for the duration of the closure of the
Federal Government from February 5,
through February 12, 2010. Thus, all
deadlines in this segment of the
proceeding have been extended by
seven days. The revised deadline for the
final determination of this investigation
is now July 12, 2010.3
Between March 8, 2010 and March 12,
2010, the Department conducted
verification of mandatory respondent
Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Yama’’).4
On April 20, 2010, the Department
received case briefs from: Berwick
Offray LLC and its wholly owned
subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc.
(‘‘Petitioner’’); Yama; and Yangzhou
Bestpak Gifts & Crafts Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Bestpak’’). On April 26, 2010, the
Department received rebuttal briefs from
Petitioner, Yama, and Bestpak.
On June 14, 2010, the Department
issued a memorandum to all interested
parties requesting comment on two
possible Harmonized Tariff Schedule
(‘‘HTS’’) numbers (i.e., 6310.10.90 and
6310.90.90) that could be used as the
surrogate value for scrap ribbon and
scrap yarn.5 On June 18, 2010, we
Preliminary Determination.
Memorandum to the Record from Ronald
Lorentzen, DAS for Import Administration,
regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As
a Result of the Government Closure During the
Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated February 12, 2010.
4 See the ‘‘Verification’’ section below for
additional information.
5 See Memorandum to The File, Antidumping
Investigation of Narrow Woven Ribbons with
Woven Selvedge from the People’s Republic of
China: Surrogate Value for Scrap Yarn and Scrap
Ribbon, dated June 14, 2010.
PO 00000
2 See
3 See
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
received comments from Yama and
Petitioner.
On June 14, 2010, in response to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit’s decision in Dorbest Limited et
al. v. United States, 2009–1257, –1266
(May 14, 2010) (‘‘Dorbest’’), the
Department issued a memorandum to
inform all interested parties that the
Department would reconsider its
valuation of the labor wage rate, and to
permit parties to comment on this
issue.6 On June 21, 2010, we received
comments from Yama and Petitioner.
Additionally, on June 15 and 22, 2010,
the Department issued a memorandum
adding additional export data to the
record related to the Department’s
determination of the surrogate value for
labor.7 On June 21, 2010, Petitioner and
Yama submitted comments regarding
the wage rate issue. Further, on June 22,
2010, the Department issued another
memorandum adding additional export
data to the record related to the
Department’s determination of the
surrogate value for labor.8 We received
no additional comments. On July 1,
2010, the Department placed further
data on the record regarding the wage
rate issue.9 No party submitted
comments.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
investigation, as well as comments
received pursuant to the Department’s
requests, are addressed in the ‘‘Narrow
Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge
from the People’s Republic of China:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Determination’’ (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’), dated
concurrently with this notice and which
is hereby adopted by this notice. A list
of the issues which parties raised and to
which we respond in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached to
this notice as Appendix I. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file in the Central
Records Unit, Room 1117 of the main
Commerce building, and is accessible
on the World Wide Web at https://
6 See Memorandum to The File, Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Narrow Woven Ribbons with
Woven Selvedge from the People’ Republic of
China: Export Data, dated June 14, 2010.
7 See Memorandum to The File, Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Narrow Woven Ribbons with
Woven Selvedge from the People’ Republic of
China: Additional Export Data, dated June 15, 2010.
8 See Memorandum to The File, Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Narrow Woven Ribbons with
Woven Selvedge from the People’ Republic of
China: Additional Export Data, dated June 22, 2010.
9 See Memorandum to The File, Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Narrow Woven Ribbons with
Woven Selvedge from the People’ Republic of
China: Data on Labor Wage, dated July 1, 2010.
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 137 (Monday, July 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41804-41808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-17538]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-583-844
Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: We determine that imports of narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value (LTFV), as provided in section
735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made
changes in the margin calculations. Therefore, the final determination
differs from the preliminary determination. The final weighted-average
dumping margins for the investigated companies are listed below in the
section entitled ``Final Determination Margins.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hector Rodriguez or Holly Phelps, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0629 and (202) 482-0656, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 18, 2010, the Department published in the Federal
Register the preliminary determination of sales at LTFV in the
antidumping duty investigation of NWR from Taiwan. See Narrow Woven
Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination,
75 FR 7236 (Feb. 18, 2010) (Preliminary Determination). Since the
preliminary determination, the following events have occurred.
In February 2010, the Department selected certain unaffiliated
companies which supplied ribbon to Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd.
(Dear Year) and Shienq Houng Group (i.e., Hsien Chan Enterprise Co.,
Ltd., Novelty Handicrafts Co., Ltd., and Shienq Huong Enterprise Co.,
Ltd. (collectively ``Shienq Huong'')), and we requested that these
unaffiliated suppliers respond to section D of the questionnaire (i.e.,
the section relating to cost of production (COP) and
[[Page 41805]]
constructed value) with respect to the merchandise supplied to Dear
Year and Shienq Huong. In February and March 2010, Dear Year's
unaffiliated supplier informed the Department that it did not produce
NWR but merely purchased and resold it, while Shienq Houng's
unaffiliated ribbon suppliers provided responses to section D of the
questionnaire.
In March 2010, we verified the questionnaire responses of three
respondents in this case, Dear Year, Roung Shu Industry Corporation
(Roung Shu), and Shienq Houng, in accordance with section 782(i) of the
Act. Also in this month, we received additional comments on the scope
of this investigation from the petitioner.\1\ Finally in March 2010, we
issued supplemental questionnaires to Shienq Huong's unaffiliated
suppliers, and we received responses to these supplemental
questionnaires in April 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petitioner in this investigation is Berwick Offray LLC
and its wholly-owned subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also in April 2010, Dear Year, Roung Shu, and the petitioner
submitted their main case briefs (i.e., related to all issues except
those associated with the responses received from the unaffiliated
suppliers noted above). We also received rebuttal briefs in April 2010
from the petitioner and the three respondents. In April 2010, we issued
additional supplemental questionnaires to Shienq Huong's unaffiliated
suppliers. We received responses to these supplemental questionnaires
in April and May 2010.
In May and June 2010, the petitioner, Dear Year, and Shienq Huong
submitted supplemental case and rebuttal briefs specifically raising
issues with regards Dear Year's and Shienq Huong's unaffiliated
suppliers of NWR.
In June 2010, the petitioner provided revised scope exclusion
language relating to NWR included in kits. For further discussion, see
the ``Scope Comments'' section, below. Also in June 2010, the
Department held a public hearing at the request of the petitioner, Dear
Year, and Shienq Huong.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2008, through June 30,
2009.
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise subject to the investigation is narrow woven
ribbons with woven selvedge, in any length, but with a width (measured
at the narrowest span of the ribbon) less than or equal to 12
centimeters, composed of, in whole or in part, man-made fibers (whether
artificial or synthetic, including but not limited to nylon, polyester,
rayon, polypropylene, and polyethylene teraphthalate), metal threads
and/or metalized yarns, or any combination thereof. Narrow woven
ribbons subject to the investigation may:
also include natural or other non-man-made fibers;
be of any color, style, pattern, or weave construction,
including but not limited to single-faced satin, double-faced satin,
grosgrain, sheer, taffeta, twill, jacquard, or a combination of two or
more colors, styles, patterns, and/or weave constructions;
have been subjected to, or composed of materials that have
been subjected to, various treatments, including but not limited to
dyeing, printing, foil stamping, embossing, flocking, coating, and/or
sizing;
have embellishments, including but not limited to
appliqu[eacute], fringes, embroidery, buttons, glitter, sequins,
laminates, and/or adhesive backing;
have wire and/or monofilament in, on, or along the
longitudinal edges of the ribbon;
have ends of any shape or dimension, including but not
limited to straight ends that are perpendicular to the longitudinal
edges of the ribbon, tapered ends, flared ends or shaped ends, and the
ends of such woven ribbons may or may not be hemmed;
have longitudinal edges that are straight or of any shape,
and the longitudinal edges of such woven ribbon may or may not be
parallel to each other;
consist of such ribbons affixed to like ribbon and/or cut-
edge woven ribbon, a configuration also known as an ``ornamental
trimming;''
be wound on spools; attached to a card; hanked (i.e.,
coiled or bundled); packaged in boxes, trays or bags; or configured as
skeins, balls, bateaus or folds; and/or
be included within a kit or set such as when packaged with
other products, including but not limited to gift bags, gift boxes and/
or other types of ribbon.
Narrow woven ribbons subject to the investigation include all
narrow woven fabrics, tapes, and labels that fall within this written
description of the scope of this investigation.
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are the following:
(1) formed bows composed of narrow woven ribbons with woven
selvedge;
(2) ``pull-bows'' (i.e., an assemblage of ribbons connected to one
another, folded flat and equipped with a means to form such ribbons
into the shape of a bow by pulling on a length of material affixed to
such assemblage) composed of narrow woven ribbons;
(3) narrow woven ribbons comprised at least 20 percent by weight of
elastomeric yarn (i.e., filament yarn, including monofilament, of
synthetic textile material, other than textured yarn, which does not
break on being extended to three times its original length and which
returns, after being extended to twice its original length, within a
period of five minutes, to a length not greater than one and a half
times its original length as defined in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS), Section XI, Note 13) or rubber thread;
(4) narrow woven ribbons of a kind used for the manufacture of
typewriter or printer ribbons;
(5) narrow woven labels and apparel tapes, cut-to-length or cut-to-
shape, having a length (when measured across the longest edge-to-edge
span) not exceeding 8 centimeters;
(6) narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge attached to and
forming the handle of a gift bag;
(7) cut-edge narrow woven ribbons formed by cutting broad woven
fabric into strips of ribbon, with or without treatments to prevent the
longitudinal edges of the ribbon from fraying (such as by merrowing,
lamination, sono-bonding, fusing, gumming or waxing), and with or
without wire running lengthwise along the longitudinal edges of the
ribbon;
(8) narrow woven ribbons comprised at least 85 percent by weight of
threads having a denier of 225 or higher;
(9) narrow woven ribbons constructed from pile fabrics (i.e.,
fabrics with a surface effect formed by tufts or loops of yarn that
stand up from the body of the fabric) ;
(10) narrow woven ribbon affixed (including by tying) as a
decorative detail to non-subject merchandise, such as a gift bag, gift
box, gift tin, greeting card or plush toy, or affixed (including by
tying) as a decorative detail to packaging containing non-subject
merchandise;
(11) narrow woven ribbon that is (a) affixed to non-subject
merchandise as a working component of such
[[Page 41806]]
non-subject merchandise, such as where narrow woven ribbon comprises an
apparel trimming, book marker, bag cinch, or part of an identity card
holder, or (b) affixed (including by tying) to non-subject merchandise
as a working component that holds or packages such non-subject
merchandise or attaches packaging or labeling to such non-subject
merchandise, such as a ``belly band'' around a pair of pajamas, a pair
of socks or a blanket;
(12) narrow woven ribbon(s) comprising a belt attached to and
imported with an item of wearing apparel, whether or not such belt is
removable from such item of wearing apparel; and
(13) narrow woven ribbon(s) included with non-subject merchandise
in kits, such as a holiday ornament craft kit or a scrapbook kit, in
which the individual lengths of narrow woven ribbon(s) included in the
kit are each no greater than eight inches, the aggregate amount of
marrow woven ribbon(s) included in the kit does not exceed 48 linear
inches, none of the narrow woven ribbon(s) included in the kit is on a
spool, and the narrow woven ribbon(s) is only one of multiple items
included in the kit.
The merchandise subject to this investigation is classifiable under
the HTSUS statistical categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under
subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00;
5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and
5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The HTSUS statistical categories and
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however,
the written description of the merchandise under investigation is
dispositive.
Scope Comments
Prior to the preliminary determination in this case, we received a
request from certain retailers of NWR that the Department modify the
scope of the investigation to exclude NWR included in kits or sets in
``de minimis'' amounts. Because of concerns over whether the proposed
scope exclusion language would be administrable, we declined to modify
the scope in the Preliminary Determination, and we did not use the
language suggested by these retailers or the alternative language
proposed by the petitioner. See Preliminary Determination, 75 FR at
7240.
Following the preliminary determination, on March 24, 2010, and
June 3, 2010, the petitioner submitted additional language for this
scope exclusion. Having determined that the language contained in the
petitioner's June 3, 2010, submission is administrable, we have
incorporated this language in exclusion 13. See the ``Scope of
Investigation'' section, above.
Unaffiliated Supplier Costs
In our Preliminary Determination, we determined that the companies
weaving the ribbon are the producers of the NWR subject to this
investigation. See Preliminary Determination, 75 FR at 7242. After
analyzing the information on the record with respect to this issue, as
well as the comments received from interested parties, we continue to
find that the weaver is the producer of NWR. See the ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum'' (Decision Memorandum) from Edward C. Yang, Acting
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, Import Administration, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy
Secretary for Import Administration, dated July 12, 2010, at Comments
19 and 20 for further discussion regarding this determination.
As noted above, from February through May 2010, we received
responses to our requests for cost information from certain of Dear
Year and Shienq Huong's unaffiliated suppliers of purchased ribbon.
With respect to Dear Year, the response from Dear Year's supplier
revealed that the supplier did not weave the merchandise under
consideration, but rather it merely purchased the ribbon from another
company and then resold it to Dear Year. Because insufficient time
existed to request additional information from the upstream supplier
prior to the final determination, as facts available for purposes of
the final determination, we are relying on Dear Year's costs of
acquisition for the purchased NWR in lieu of actual production costs
from the weavers as such information is not contained in the record of
this proceeding. For further discussion, see Comment 19 in the Decision
Memorandum.
With respect to Shienq Huong's unaffiliated suppliers, these
companies provided certain cost information but informed the Department
that they did not maintain records at a sufficient level of detail to
provide POI product-specific costs. Because the submitted costs are not
POI product-specific costs, we are unable to use them in our analysis
for the final determination. Therefore, as with Dear Year, as facts
available for purposes of the final determination, we are relying on
Shienq Huong's costs of acquisition for the purchased NWR ribbon costs
in lieu of actual costs of production from the weaver, as the weaver is
unable to provide such costs on a sufficiently specific basis for use
in the Department's calculations. For further discussion, see Comment
20 in the Decision Memorandum.
Section 776(a) of the Act provides that the Department shall apply
``facts otherwise available'' if (1) necessary information is not on
the record, or (2) an interested party or any other person (A)
withholds information that has been requested, (B) fails to provide
information within the deadlines established, or in the form and manner
requested by the Department, subject to subsections (c)(1) and (e) of
section 782 of the Act, (C) significantly impedes a proceeding, or (D)
provides information that cannot be verified as provided by section
782(i) of the Act. Here, we lack information necessary to determine the
unaffiliated suppliers' actual costs and must, therefore, rely upon
facts available. Although we appropriately requested the unaffiliated
suppliers' costs, the suppliers did not maintain records at a
sufficient level of detail to provide such costs in a manner
sufficiently detailed for use in the Department's margin calculations;
therefore, we are relying on the acquisition prices for purchased
ribbon as facts available because they are product-specific and
constitute the only useable data available with respect to purchased
ribbon. However, if an antidumping duty order is issued in this
proceeding, we will require product-specific costs from unaffiliated
suppliers, if requested. This constitutes notice to the weavers of NWR
that information must be maintained to allow the reporting of costs on
a product-specific basis.
Cost of Production
As discussed in the preliminary determination, we conducted an
investigation to determine whether the respondents made comparison
market sales of the foreign like product during the POI at prices below
their COP within the meaning of section 773(b) of the Act. See
Preliminary Determination, 75 FR 7236 (Feb. 18, 2010). For this final
determination, we performed the cost test following the same
methodology as in the Preliminary Determination.
We found that 20 percent or more of each respondent's sales of a
given product during the POI were at prices
[[Page 41807]]
less than the weighted-average COP for this period. Thus, we determined
that these below-cost sales were made in ``substantial quantities''
within an extended period of time and at prices which did not permit
the recovery of all costs within a reasonable period of time in the
normal course of trade. See sections 773(b)(1)-(2) of the Act.
Therefore, for purposes of this final determination, we found that
each respondent made below-cost sales not in the ordinary course of
trade. Consequently, we disregarded these sales and used the remaining
sales as the basis for determining normal value for each respondent
pursuant to section 773(b)(1) of the Act.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are addressed in the Decision Memorandum, which is
adopted by this notice. Parties can find a complete discussion of the
issues raised in this investigation and the corresponding
recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, room 1117 of the main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/.
The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at
verification, we have made certain changes to the margin calculations.
For a discussion of these changes, see the ``Margin Calculations''
section of the Decision Memorandum.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the sales and
cost information submitted by the respondents for use in our final
determination. We used standard verification procedures including an
examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original
source documents provided by the respondents.
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
Pursuant to 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all
entries of subject merchandise from Taiwan, entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after February 18, 2010, the date of
publication of the preliminary determination in the Federal Register.
CBP shall require a cash deposit or the posting of a bond equal to the
estimated amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price as
shown below. These instructions suspending liquidation will remain in
effect until further notice. For Dear Year and Shienq Huong, because
their estimated weighted-average final dumping margins are zero, we are
not directing CBP to suspend liquidation of entries of NWR produced and
exported by these companies.
Finally, we note that neither Dear Year nor Shienq Huong has
disclosed for the public record the names of their unaffiliated
suppliers. Therefore, upon public disclosure of this information to the
Department, we will notify CBP that Dear Year's and Shienq Huong's
exports of merchandise produced by these unaffiliated suppliers have
LTFV investigation margins of zero and thus are excluded from any order
resulting from this investigation. Until and unless such public
disclosure is made, we will notify CBP that all entries of merchandise
produced by Dear Year's and Shienq Huong's unaffiliated suppliers will
be subject to the ``all others'' rate established in this proceeding.
Final Determination Margins
The weighted-average dumping margins are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Manufacturer/Exporter Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Year Brothers Mfg. Co., Ltd.................... 0.00
Roung Shu Industry Corporation...................... 4.37
Shienq Huong Enterprise Co., Ltd./Hsien Chan 0.00
Enterprise Co., Ltd./Novelty Handicrafts Co., Ltd..
All Others.......................................... 4.37
------------------------------------------------------------------------
``All Others'' Rate
In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we have based
the ``All Others'' rate on the weighted average of the dumping margins
calculated for the exporters/manufacturers investigated in this
proceeding. The ``All Others'' rate is calculated exclusive of all de
minimis margins and margins based entirely on AFA.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we have notified the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of our final determination. As our
final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine within 45
days whether imports of the subject merchandise are causing material
injury, or threat of material injury, to an industry in the United
States. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of injury
does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all securities
posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines that such
injury does exist, the Department will issue an antidumping duty order
directing CBP to assess antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
This notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in
accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix Issues in Decision Memorandum
General Issues
1. Targeted Dumping
2. The Appropriate Unit of Measure On Which to Base Sales and Cost Data
3. How to Define the Product Characteristic ``Color''
4. Display Unit Costs
Company-Specific Issues
5. Date of Shipment for Dear Year
6. Dear Year's Sales of Traded Goods
7. The Treatment of a Relabeling Billing Adjustment for Dear Year
8. The Treatment of Dear Year's ``Combination'' Ribbons
[[Page 41808]]
9. Clerical Error in Dear Year's Preliminary Dumping Margin
10. Dear Year's Sample Sales
11. Reallocation of Variable Overhead for Dear Year
12. Variables Names in Dear Year's Cost Database
13. The Treatment of the Product Characteristic ``Width'' for Roung Shu
14. Warranty Expenses for Roung Shu
15. Roung Shu's Reporting of the Costs Associated with Different Colors
of NWR
16. Financial Expenses for Roung Shu
17. Financial Expenses for Shienq Huong
18. Depreciation Expense for Shienq Huong
Issues Related to Unaffiliated Suppliers
19. Dear Year's Unaffiliated Suppliers' Cost of Production (COP)
20. Shienq Huong's Unaffiliated Suppliers' COP
21. Assigning Combination Rates to Dear Year and Shienq Huong
[FR Doc. 2010-17538 Filed 7-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S