Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 39710-39711 [2010-16841]
Download as PDF
39710
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 132 / Monday, July 12, 2010 / Notices
security is not impacted by this
exemption.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
4.0
Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission
concludes that granting the requested
exemption is consistent with existing
regulation at 10 CFR 26.207(d), ‘‘Plant
emergencies,’’ which allows the licensee
to not meet the requirements of 10 CFR
26.205(c) and (d) during declared
emergencies as defined in the licensee’s
emergency plan. The 10 CFR Part 26
Statements of Consideration (73 FR
17148; March 31, 2008), state that ‘‘Plant
emergencies are extraordinary
circumstances that may be most
effectively addressed through staff
augmentation that can only be
practically achieved through the use of
work hours in excess of the limits of
§ 26.205(c) and (d).’’ The objective of the
exemption is to ensure that the control
of work hours do not impede a
licensee’s ability to use whatever staff
resources may be necessary to respond
to a plant emergency and ensure that the
plant maintains a safe and secure status.
The actions described in the
exemption request and ‘‘Hurricane Plan’’
procedure are consistent with the
recommendations in NUREG–1474,
‘‘Effect of Hurricane Andrew on the
Turkey Point Nuclear Generating
Station from August 20–30, 1992.’’ Also
consistent with NUREG–1474, NRC staff
expects the licensee would have
completed a reasonable amount of
hurricane preparation prior to the need
to sequester personnel, in order to
minimize personnel exposure to high
winds.
The NRC staff has determined that: (1)
The proposed exemption is authorized
by law;(2) there is a reasonable
assurance that the health and safety of
the public will not be endangered by the
proposed exemption; (3) such activities
will be consistent with the
Commission’s regulations and guidance;
and (4) the issuance of the exemption
will not endanger the common defense
and security.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, ‘‘Finding of
no significant impact,’’ the Commission
has previously determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 21678;
April 26, 2010).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of July 2010.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Jul 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–16878 Filed 7–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2010–25; Order No. 483]
Postal Classification Change
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently–filed Postal Service request
concerning two classification changes to
Address Management Services. This
notice addresses procedural steps
associated with these filings.
DATES: Comments are due: July 13,
2010.
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at
https://www.prc.gov. Commenters who
cannot submit their views electronically
should contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section by telephone for advice on
alternatives to electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 2,
2010, the Postal Service filed a notice
pursuant to 39 CFR 3020.90 and 3020.91
concerning two classification changes to
Address Management Services.1
The first change removes ‘‘Delivery
Type’’ service from the list of services
included within Address Management
Services. The Postal Service states that
this service is limited, outdated, not
widely used, and the information
obtained through this service may be
obtained through other services. Id. at 1.
Rule 3020.91 requires that the Postal
Service file a notice of proposed change
no later than 15 days prior to the
effective date of the change. The Postal
Service intends to offer Delivery Type
service subscriptions through
September 30, 2010, and honor
subscriptions until they expire. Id.
The second change removes the
specifications as to how information is
provided to customers for CRIS Route,
City State, Delivery Statistics, eLOT, 5–
Digit ZIP, Official National Zone Charge,
ADDRESSES:
1 Notice of the United States Postal Service of
Classification Changes Related to Address
Management Services, July 2, 2010 (Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Z4 Change, ZIP+4, ZIP Move, AMS API,
and TIGER ZIP+4 services. Currently,
CD–ROM, DVD, and disc are specified.
Id. at 2. The Postal Service states that
removing the specifications will allow it
to provide information by any
appropriate means. Id.
The Commission establishes Docket
No. MC2010–25 for consideration of
matters related to the Address
Management Services classification
changes identified in the Postal
Service’s Notice.
Interested persons may submit
comments on the changes proposed
within the Postal Service’s Notice.
Comments are due no later than July 13,
2010. The Postal Service’s Request can
be accessed via the Commission’s Web
site (https://www.prc.gov). Proposed
edits to the draft Mail Classification
Schedule are attached to the Postal
Service’s Notice.
The Commission appoints Emmett
Rand Costich to serve as Public
Representative in the captioned
proceedings.
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. MC2010–25 for consideration of
matters raised by the Postal Service’s
Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
July 13, 2010.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Emmett
Rand Costich is appointed to serve as
the officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Shoshana M. Grove,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–16868 Filed 7–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Rule 303, SEC File No. 270–450, OMB
Control No. 3235–0505]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 303, SEC File No. 270–450, OMB
Control No. 3235–0505.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 132 / Monday, July 12, 2010 / Notices
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the existing collection of information
provided for in Rule 303 (17 CFR
242.303) of Regulation ATS (17 CFR
242.300 et seq.) under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et
seq.). The Commission plans to submit
this existing collection of information to
the Office of Management and Budget
for extension and approval.
Regulation ATS sets forth a regulatory
regime for ‘‘alternative trading systems’’
(‘‘ATSs’’), which are entities that carry
out exchange functions but which are
not required to register as national
securities exchanges under the Act. In
lieu of exchange registration, an ATS
can instead opt to register with the
Commission as a broker-dealer and, as
a condition to not having to register as
an exchange, must instead comply with
Regulation ATS. Rule 303 of Regulation
ATS (17 CFR 242.303) describes the
record preservation requirements for
ATSs. Rule 303 also describes how such
records must be maintained, what
entities may perform this function, and
how long records must be preserved.
Under Rule 303, ATSs are required to
preserve all records made pursuant to
Rule 302, which includes information
relating to subscribers, trading
summaries, and time-sequenced order
information. Rule 303 also requires
ATSs to preserve any notices provided
to subscribers, including, but not
limited to, notices regarding the ATSs
operations and subscriber access. For an
ATS subject to the fair access
requirements described in Rule
301(b)(5)(ii) of Regulation ATS, Rule
303 further requires the ATS to preserve
at least one copy of its standards for
access to trading, all documents relevant
to the ATS’s decision to grant, deny, or
limit access to any person, and all other
documents made or received by the ATS
in the course of complying with Rule
301(b)(5) of Regulation ATS. For an ATS
subject to the capacity, integrity, and
security requirements for automated
systems under Rule 301(b)(6) of
Regulation ATS, Rule 303 requires an
ATS to preserve all documents made or
received by the ATS related to its
compliance, including all
correspondence, memoranda, papers,
books, notices, accounts, reports, test
scripts, test results, and other similar
records. As provided in Rule 303(a)(1),
ATSs are required to keep all of these
records, as applicable, for a period of at
least three years, the first two in an
easily accessible place. In addition, Rule
303 requires ATSs to preserve records of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Jul 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
partnership articles, articles of
incorporation or charter, minute books,
stock certificate books, copies of reports
filed pursuant to Rule 301(b)(2), and
records made pursuant to Rule 301(b)(5)
for the life of the ATS.
The information contained in the
records required to be preserved by Rule
303 will be used by examiners and other
representatives of the Commission, State
securities regulatory authorities, and the
self-regulatory organizations to ensure
that ATSs are in compliance with
Regulation ATS as well as other
applicable rules and regulations.
Without the data required by the Rule,
regulators would be limited in their
ability to comply with their statutory
obligations, provide for the protection of
investors, and promote the maintenance
of fair and orderly markets.
Respondents consist of ATSs that
choose to register as broker-dealers and
comply with the requirements of
Regulation ATS. There are currently 81
respondents. To comply with the record
preservation requirements of Rule 303,
these respondents will spend
approximately 1,215 hours per year (81
respondents at 15 burden hours/
respondent). At an average cost per
burden hour of $106, the resultant total
related cost of compliance for these
respondents is $128,790 per year (1,215
burden hours multiplied by $106/hour).
Written comments are invited on (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to: Charles Boucher, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission will hold a Closed Meeting
on Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii)
and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Casey, as duty officer,
voted to consider the items listed for the
Closed Meeting in a closed session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday, July
15, 2010 will be:
Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings;
Consideration of amicus participation;
and
Other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
551–5400.
Dated: July 8, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–17057 Filed 7–8–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–16841 Filed 7–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
39711
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 132 (Monday, July 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39710-39711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16841]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Rule 303, SEC File No. 270-450, OMB Control No. 3235-0505]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 303, SEC File No. 270-450, OMB Control No. 3235-0505.
[[Page 39711]]
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 303 (17 CFR 242.303) of
Regulation ATS (17 CFR 242.300 et seq.) under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
Regulation ATS sets forth a regulatory regime for ``alternative
trading systems'' (``ATSs''), which are entities that carry out
exchange functions but which are not required to register as national
securities exchanges under the Act. In lieu of exchange registration,
an ATS can instead opt to register with the Commission as a broker-
dealer and, as a condition to not having to register as an exchange,
must instead comply with Regulation ATS. Rule 303 of Regulation ATS (17
CFR 242.303) describes the record preservation requirements for ATSs.
Rule 303 also describes how such records must be maintained, what
entities may perform this function, and how long records must be
preserved.
Under Rule 303, ATSs are required to preserve all records made
pursuant to Rule 302, which includes information relating to
subscribers, trading summaries, and time-sequenced order information.
Rule 303 also requires ATSs to preserve any notices provided to
subscribers, including, but not limited to, notices regarding the ATSs
operations and subscriber access. For an ATS subject to the fair access
requirements described in Rule 301(b)(5)(ii) of Regulation ATS, Rule
303 further requires the ATS to preserve at least one copy of its
standards for access to trading, all documents relevant to the ATS's
decision to grant, deny, or limit access to any person, and all other
documents made or received by the ATS in the course of complying with
Rule 301(b)(5) of Regulation ATS. For an ATS subject to the capacity,
integrity, and security requirements for automated systems under Rule
301(b)(6) of Regulation ATS, Rule 303 requires an ATS to preserve all
documents made or received by the ATS related to its compliance,
including all correspondence, memoranda, papers, books, notices,
accounts, reports, test scripts, test results, and other similar
records. As provided in Rule 303(a)(1), ATSs are required to keep all
of these records, as applicable, for a period of at least three years,
the first two in an easily accessible place. In addition, Rule 303
requires ATSs to preserve records of partnership articles, articles of
incorporation or charter, minute books, stock certificate books, copies
of reports filed pursuant to Rule 301(b)(2), and records made pursuant
to Rule 301(b)(5) for the life of the ATS.
The information contained in the records required to be preserved
by Rule 303 will be used by examiners and other representatives of the
Commission, State securities regulatory authorities, and the self-
regulatory organizations to ensure that ATSs are in compliance with
Regulation ATS as well as other applicable rules and regulations.
Without the data required by the Rule, regulators would be limited in
their ability to comply with their statutory obligations, provide for
the protection of investors, and promote the maintenance of fair and
orderly markets.
Respondents consist of ATSs that choose to register as broker-
dealers and comply with the requirements of Regulation ATS. There are
currently 81 respondents. To comply with the record preservation
requirements of Rule 303, these respondents will spend approximately
1,215 hours per year (81 respondents at 15 burden hours/respondent). At
an average cost per burden hour of $106, the resultant total related
cost of compliance for these respondents is $128,790 per year (1,215
burden hours multiplied by $106/hour).
Written comments are invited on (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimates of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to: Charles Boucher, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send
an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16841 Filed 7-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P