Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Overview Information; Safe and Supportive Schools; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010, 39504-39510 [2010-16811]
Download as PDF
39504
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools;
Overview Information; Safe and
Supportive Schools; Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.184Y.
Dates:
Applications Available: July 9, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 9, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Purpose of Program: Safe and
Supportive Schools awards grants to
State educational agencies (SEAs) to
support statewide measurement of, and
targeted programmatic interventions to
improve, conditions for learning in
order to help schools improve safety
and reduce substance use.
Background: Our Nation’s schools
should be safe and secure settings where
children can learn and grow to their full
potential. Parents want and expect the
schools their children attend to be safe.
Unfortunately, data suggests that
significant levels of violence, bullying,
and other problems in schools create
conditions that negatively impact
learning. The most recent data on school
crime and safety indicate that while the
incidence of violent crimes in schools
decreased from 1992 to 2007, students
are now more likely to experience nonfatal crimes (including theft, simple
assault, aggravated assault, rape, and
sexual assault) in school than outside of
school. During the 2007–2008 school
year, 85 percent of public schools in the
United States recorded that at least one
crime occurred at their school.1 Based
on reported data, bullying in schools
has increased in recent years. In 2001,
14 percent of students ages 12 through
18 reported that they had been bullied
in school. By 2007, 32 percent of
students ages 12 through 18 reported
that they were bullied at school, and 4
percent reported having been bullied
over the Internet (‘‘cyber bullied’’).2 In
addition, substance use remains a
pervasive issue threatening student
health. In 2007, 45 percent of high
1 Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., Baum, K. and Snyder, T.D.
(2009). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2009
(NCES 2010–012/NCJ 228478) National Center for
Education Statistics, Institute for Education
Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, and
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice
Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2 U.S. Department of Education. National Center
for Education Statistics. Indicators of School Crime
and Safety: 2009.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
school students reported having
consumed at least one drink of alcohol,
while 20 percent reported using
marijuana within the last 30 days.3
Disruptive aggressive behaviors such
as bullying and violence create a hostile
school environment that may interfere
with the academic performance and
mental health of students who are
victims or witnesses. Students who are
exposed to high levels of aggressive
behavior and violence at school are
more likely to disengage from school 4
and to experience clinical levels of
mental and emotional disorders than are
students who experience either no or
low levels of violence at schools.5
Students who are bullied are also more
likely to become truant from school 6
and have lower academic performance.7
Research indicates that the majority of
school shooters had been previously
bullied.8 Disruptive and aggressive
behaviors in the classroom, and the
resulting suspensions and expulsions,
also diminish teachers’ and students’
instructional and learning time. Of the
271,800 serious disciplinary actions that
were taken during the 2007–2008 school
year for physical attacks or fights, 79
percent were out-of-school suspensions
lasting five days or more.9
To ensure that schools are safe places
for students to learn, schools should
understand the issues their
communities face and the conditions
that may influence student risk
behaviors to best formulate intervention
and prevention strategies. School
communities are complex systems that
include multiple stakeholders and
interconnecting environmental factors
that influence student health and safety.
As such, comprehensive needs
assessments of conditions for learning—
3 U.S. Department of Education. National Center
for Education Statistics. Indicators of School Crime
and Safety: 2009.
4 Bowen, N.K. & Bowen, G.L. (1999). Effects of
crime and violence in neighborhoods and schools
on the school behaviors and performance of
adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14,
319–342.
5 Flannery, D.J., Wester, K.L. & Singer, M.I.
(2004). Impact of exposures to violence in school
on child and adolescent mental health and
behavior. Journal of Community Psychology. 32,
559–573.
6 Smith, P.K. & Sharp, S. (1994). The problem of
school bullying. In P.K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.)
School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. New
York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–19.
7 Glew, G., Fan, F., Katon, W., Rivara, F., Kernic,
M. (2005). Bullying, psychosocial adjustement, and
academic performance in elementary school. Arch
Pediatr Adolesc Med, 159, 1026–1031.
8 Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M., Smith, L., &
Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence:
Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive
Behavior, 29, 202–214.
9 U.S. Department of Education. National Center
for Education Statistics. 2007–2008 Survey on
Crime and Safety (SSOCS), 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
including school engagement, school
safety, and the school environment as
elements evaluated—can provide
educators with the data support needed
to pursue comprehensive approaches to
school reform. One element of
conditions for learning is school
engagement, including the relationships
between the members of the school
community and the extent to which
members participate in school activities.
For example, research shows that
positive student-teacher relationships
characterized by fairness and care are a
protective factor against the initiation
and escalation of cigarette smoking and
alcohol use, and are associated with the
cessation of weapon-related violence.10
In addition, increases in parent
involvement have been associated with
increases in social skills and decreases
in behavioral problems among
elementary school children.11 Various
aspects of the school environment, such
as the physical, academic, and
disciplinary environment, and the
presence of health supports, may serve
as another element. For example,
research has indicated that student
perceptions of the fairness and clarity of
disciplinary procedures are associated
with student delinquency, student
victimization, and teacher
victimization.12 As schools implement
programmatic interventions that target
school engagement, school
environment, and other factors related
to conditions for learning, they may
need school safety data, a third element,
to help them determine the relative
safety of their school over time and to
decide what interventions, if any, might
be appropriate. By monitoring
indicators such as the frequency and
severity of student risk behaviors and
perceptions of school safety, schools
may identify threats to school safety and
then use this information to implement
the appropriate intervention or program
to improve school safety.
A comprehensive picture of school
health and safety can be created by
utilizing needs assessments that include
student perceptions and, where
appropriate, parents and staff
10 McNeely, C., Falci, C. (2004). School
connectedness and the transition into and out of
health-risk behavior among adolescents: A
comparison of social belonging and teacher support.
Journal of School Health, 74(7), 284–292.
11 El Nokali, N., Bachman, H., Vortuba-Drzal, E.
(2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic
and social development in elementary school. Child
Development, 81(3), 988–1005.
12 Gottfredson, G., Gottfredson, D., Payne, A.,
Gottfredson, N. (2005). School climate predictors of
school disorder: Results from a national study of
delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of
Research in Crime and Delinquency. 42(4), 412–
444.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
perceptions, to help schools identify key
issues in need of attention. For example,
research demonstrates that teachers’
perceptions and attitudes toward
bullying can significantly impact
students’ acceptance of and engagement
in bullying behaviors.13 Efforts to
increase parental engagement may be
impacted by preexisting parental
attitudes and perceptions.14 Including
parents in the assessment process could
help schools to understand these
preexisting attitudes, which may inform
schools decisions regarding how best to
communicate with parents, and increase
their engagement. Schools might
consider examining parent attitudes of
student behaviors as part of a parent
engagement or parent education strategy
to combat violence and substance use;
research shows linkages between
student perceptions of parental attitudes
and student risk behaviors such as
weapons carrying, schools fights,15
alcohol use, and tobacco use.16
Safe and Supportive Schools will
provide grants to support statewide
measurement of, and targeted
programmatic interventions to improve,
the conditions for learning by helping
schools to reduce substance use and
improve safety by managing the broad
continuum of detrimental behaviors,
including disruptive behaviors, violent
crime, and substance use.
In the following sections, we
announce an absolute priority, a
competitive preference priority, and an
invitational priority, and requirements
for this competition as well as define
key terms used in this notice.
Absolute Priority: We are establishing
this absolute priority for the FY 2010
grant competition and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the
list of unfunded applicants from this
competition, in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C.
1232(d)(1). Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)
13 Chang, L. (2003). Variable effects of children’s
aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial
leadership as a function of teacher beliefs and
behaviors. Child Development, 74(2), 535–548;
Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Van
Acker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences
on aggression in urban elementary school
classrooms. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 28(1), 59–81.
14 Green, C., Walker, J. (2007). Parents’
motivations for involvement in children’s
education: An empirical test of a theoretical model
of parental involvement. Journal of Education
Psychology, 99(3), 532–544.
15 Orpinas, P., Murray, N., Keider, S. (1999).
Parental influences on students’ aggressive
behaviors and weapon carrying. Health Educ Behav,
26, 774–787.
16 Simons-Morton, B., Haynie, D., Crump, D.,
Eitel, P., Saylor, K. (2001). Peer and Parent
Influences on Smoking and Drinking among Early
Adolescents. Health Educ Behav, 28, 95–107.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
we consider only applications that meet
this priority.
This priority is:
Grants to States to Improve
Conditions for Learning.
This priority supports grants to SEAs
for projects that take a systematic
approach to improving conditions for
learning in eligible schools through
improved measurement systems that
assess conditions for learning, which
must include school safety, and the
implementation of programmatic
interventions that address problems
identified by data.
Competitive Preference Priority: We
are establishing this competitive
preference priority for the FY 2010 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C.
1232(d)(1). Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)
we award an additional 5 points to an
application that meets this priority.
This priority is:
Inclusion of School Engagement and
School Environment in Needs
Assessments Measuring Conditions for
Learning (5 points).
To meet this priority, the applicant
must propose to implement a
measurement system that uses valid and
reliable instruments to gather
comprehensive data related to school
engagement and school environment
from students to assess conditions for
learning.
Invitational Priority: We are
establishing this invitational priority for
the FY 2010 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not give an
application that meets this invitational
priority a competitive or absolute
preference over other applications.
This priority is:
Family and Staff Inclusion in Needs
Assessments Measuring School
Engagement
Under this priority, we are interested
in applications from SEAs that propose
to implement a measurement system
that uses valid and reliable instruments
to gather comprehensive data from
school staff and from students’ families
or guardians in order to assess school
engagement.
Program Requirements: The following
requirements apply to projects funded
under this competition:
1. Measurement System
(a) Each grantee must implement a
measurement system that—
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39505
(1) Collects survey data and incident
data (as defined in this notice) from
participating local educational agencies
(LEAs) that have a combined student
enrollment of no less than 20 percent of
the State’s total student enrollment;
(2) Collects student survey data from
eligible schools to assess conditions for
learning, which will include, at a
minimum, school safety;
(3) Uses survey sampling procedures
that collect data from a representative
sample of the students in grades 9 and
above within the eligible schools
surveyed;
(4) Uses valid and reliable survey
instruments (as defined in this notice);
(5) Collects the required survey data
from all eligible schools in participating
LEAs within the first 12 months of the
project period and again during the final
12 months of the project period;
(6) Collects the required survey data
from each eligible school selected to
implement programmatic interventions
(as defined in this notice) in each year
of the project period;
(7) Collects incident data (as defined
in this notice) from all eligible schools
in participating LEAs in each year of the
project period; and
(8) Allows the data to be summarized
in ways that can be used to engage
school staff and families or guardians in
discussions of the results.
2. School Safety Scores
(a) Each grantee must generate a
school safety score (as defined in this
notice) for each eligible school in its
participating LEAs, using both student
survey data and incident data (as
defined in this notice) that is
disaggregated by school building, within
the first 12 months of the project period
and again during the final 12 months of
the project period;
(b) Additionally, each grantee must
generate a school safety score for each
eligible school selected to implement
programmatic interventions (as defined
in this notice), using both student
survey data and incident data (as
defined in this notice) that is
disaggregated at the school building
level, in each year of the project period;
and
(c) Each grantee must publicly report
school safety scores for each eligible
school in its participating LEAs after the
initial year and final year of the project
period, and for each year of the project
period for eligible schools selected to
implement programmatic interventions.
To satisfy this requirement, each grantee
must—
(i) Prior to the start of each school
year, post school safety scores,
generated from current data, on the
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
39506
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
Internet in a manner that is easily
accessible to the general public; and
(ii) Within the first 12 months of the
project period, post the formula used to
generate school safety scores on the
Internet in a manner that is easily
accessible to the general public.
3. Implementing Programmatic
Interventions and Technical Assistance
Strategies
Each grantee must—
(a) In consultation with its
participating LEAs, using criteria that
incorporate student survey data and
incident data from the measurement
system, the list of persistently lowestachieving schools (as defined in this
notice), or both, select eligible schools
in need of programmatic interventions
(as defined in this notice);
(b) In consultation with its
participating LEAs, implement
programmatic interventions (as defined
in this notice) in a number of eligible
schools, located in participating LEAs,
totaling no more than 20 percent of the
total number of eligible schools in the
State, to ensure that programmatic
interventions are of sufficient size and
scope;
(c) Provide its participating LEAs and
eligible schools with technical
assistance in using survey data to drive
school improvement, including using
data to assess areas in need of
improvement, and identifying
programmatic interventions to address
these areas; and
(d) Use at least 80 percent of grant
funds awarded in project years two,
three, and four to carry out
programmatic interventions (as defined
in this notice) and related technical
assistance.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Note: For the purposes of these program
requirements, grantees may implement
programmatic interventions that serve any
student within an eligible school, including
those students in grades 8 and below.
Grantees are not required to survey students
in grades 8 and below.
Application Requirements: The
following requirements apply to all
applications submitted under this
competition. Applications that fail to
meet any one of these requirements will
not be read or scored. In its application,
an applicant must—
(a) Identify the LEAs that will
participate in the proposed project. If
the LEAs that will participate have not
been identified by the time the
application is submitted, the applicant
must provide a description of the
process it will use to select LEAs to
participate;
(b) Describe the process it will use to
consult with participating LEAs to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
develop a formula to be used to generate
school safety scores required under the
program;
(c) Describe its plan to maintain,
improve, or build State-level capacity to
conduct the following activities:
(1) Developing, adapting, or adopting
valid and reliable survey instruments.
(2) Administering surveys using
established sampling and
administration methodologies to ensure
adequate school-level representation
and high response rates.
(3) Tracking costs by major
component (e.g., student survey data
collection).
(4) Safeguarding the privacy and
confidentiality of the survey
respondents and complying with the
requirements of the Protection of Pupil
Rights Amendment, 20 U.S.C. 1232h; 34
CFR part 98 in collecting survey data
and with the requirements of the Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20
U.S.C. 1232g; 34 CFR part 99 in
collecting any survey or incident data
containing personally identifiable
information;
(d) Provide a brief description of the
specific constructs to be included on
any survey instruments, including
constructs used to assess school safety;
(e) Explain the strategies it will use to
identify and address any anticipated
challenges (including statutory or
regulatory requirements) involved in
collecting the required data in the
participating LEAs. At a minimum, each
applicant must identify and address
anticipated barriers to obtaining high
response rates for surveys;
(f) Describe how it will use the data
collected from the measurement system
and the school safety scores generated
from such data to engage families and
guardians in a discussion of the
findings; to examine how a school’s
setting, policies, and practices promote
or inhibit student safety from physical
violence; and to examine how a school’s
setting, policies, and practices might
reduce disruptive behaviors while
reducing suspensions and expulsions;
(g) Describe how it will provide
technical assistance to participating
LEAs and their schools on the use,
meaning, and application of required
survey data and incident data (as
defined in this notice);
(h) Describe the strategies it will use
to consult with participating LEAs to
identify and implement programmatic
interventions (as defined in this notice)
in identified schools that respond to
needs identified by data collected
through the measurement system; and
(i) Comply with the requirements of
any evaluation of the program
conducted by the Department, including
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by sharing all data collected through the
measurement system with the
Department or an evaluator selected by
the Department.
Administrative Requirement:
Although programmatic interventions
will be delivered at the LEA level, the
SEA must retain administrative
direction and fiscal control for the
project.
Definitions: We are establishing these
definitions for the FY 2010 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition, in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Conditions for learning means the
school setting, which includes, at a
minimum, school safety, and which
may include school environment and
school engagement.
Eligible school means any school that
includes 9th grade, 10th grade, 11th
grade, or 12th grade.
Incident data means data from
incident reports by school officials
including, but not limited to, truancy
rates; the frequency, seriousness, and
incidence of violence and drug-related
offenses resulting in suspensions and
expulsions; and the incidence and
prevalence of drug use and violence by
students in schools.
Moderate evidence means evidence
from previous studies with designs that
can support causal conclusions (i.e.,
studies with high internal validity) but
have limited generalizability (i.e.,
moderate external validity) or from
studies with high external validity but
moderate internal validity.
Persistently lowest-achieving schools
means, as determined by the State, (a)(1)
any Title I school in improvement,
corrective action, or restructuring that
(i) is among the lowest-achieving five
percent of Title I schools in
improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring or the lowest-achieving
five Title I schools in improvement,
corrective action, or restructuring in the
State, whichever number of schools is
greater; or (ii) is a high school that has
had a graduation rate as defined in 34
CFR 200.19(b) that is less than 60
percent over a number of years; and (2)
any secondary school that is eligible for,
but does not receive, Title I funds that
(i) is among the lowest-achieving five
percent of secondary schools or the
lowest-achieving five secondary schools
in the State that are eligible for, but do
not receive, Title I funds, whichever
number of schools is greater; or (ii) is a
high school that has had a graduation
rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that
is less than 60 percent over a number of
years.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
Programmatic intervention means any
program, strategy, activity, service, or
policy for school or community settings
that prevents and reduces youth crime,
violence, harassment, bullying, and the
illegal use of drugs, alcohol, and
tobacco; creates positive relationships
between students and adults; promotes
parent and community engagement;
promotes the character, social, and
emotional development of students;
provides or improves access to social
services; enables school communities to
manage student behaviors effectively
while lowering suspensions and
expulsions; or provides other needed
social and emotional supports for
students. Programmatic interventions
should be based on the best available
evidence, including, where available,
strong or moderate evidence (as defined
in this notice).
School engagement means
participation in school-related activities,
and the quality of school relationships,
which may include relationships
between and among administrators,
teachers, parents and students.
School environment means the extent
to which school settings promote
student safety and student health,
which may include topics such as the
physical plant, the academic
environment, available physical and
mental health supports and services,
and the fairness and adequacy of
disciplinary procedures, as supported
by relevant research and an assessment
of validity.
School safety means the safety of
school settings, based on factors which
may include topics such as the presence
and use of illegal drugs (including
alcohol use), bullying, and violence, as
supported by relevant research and an
assessment of validity.
School safety score means a figure
calculated with a formula, developed by
the State in consultation with LEAs and
applied uniformly to all eligible schools
in participating LEAs within the State,
that uses both the survey data and
incident data (as defined in this notice)
collected by a measurement system, and
that facilitates school comparisons.
Strong evidence means evidence from
studies with designs that can support
causal conclusions (i.e., studies with
high internal validity), and studies that,
in total, include enough of the range of
participants and settings to support
scaling up to the State, regional, or
national level (i.e., studies with high
external validity).
Valid and reliable survey instruments
mean intact sets of survey questions that
have been demonstrated statistically to
produce results that are both
consistently and accurately measuring
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
appropriate concepts of interest for the
age groups surveyed.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed priorities,
definitions, requirements. Section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the
Secretary to exempt from rulemaking
requirements, regulations governing the
first grant competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition for
Safe and Supportive Schools and,
therefore qualifies for this exemption. In
order to ensure timely grant awards, the
Secretary has decided to forgo public
comment on the priorities,
requirements, and definitions under
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
priorities, requirements, and definitions
will apply to the FY 2010 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84,
85, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The regulations
in 34 CFR part 299.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$27,300,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2011 from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$1,000,000–$12,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $1
million per year for a State with up to
199,999 students enrolled; $2.5 million
per year for a State with 200,000–
499,999 students enrolled; $3.5 million
per year for a State with 500,000—
999,999 students enrolled; $6 million
per year for a State with 1,000,000–
1,999,999 students enrolled; and $12
million per year for a State with at least
2,000,000 students enrolled. Award
ranges are based on 2008–2009 school
year enrollment data submitted by SEAs
through the National Center for
Education Statistics.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5–7.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice. The Department will
decide on the size of each SEA’s award based
on a detailed review of the budget the SEA
requests, considering such factors as the size
of the State, level of LEA participation, and
the proposed activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39507
Project Period: Up to 48 months, of
which no more than 12 months may be
used for planning and program design.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs, as
defined by section 9101(41) of the
ESEA.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
3. Participation by Private School
Children and Teachers. Section 9501 of
the ESEA requires that SEAs, LEAs, or
other entities receiving funds under the
Safe and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities Act provide for the
equitable participation of private school
children, their teachers, and other
educational personnel in private schools
located in geographic areas served by
the grant recipient.
In order to ensure that grant program
activities address the needs of private
school children, the applicant must
engage in timely and meaningful
consultation with appropriate private
school officials during the design and
development of the proposed program.
This consultation must take place before
the applicant makes any decision that
affects the opportunities of eligible
private school children, teachers, and
other educational personnel to
participate in grant program activities.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: You can obtain an application
package via the Internet, from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the Internet, use
the following address: https://
www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write,
fax, or call the following: ED Pubs, U.S.
Department of Education, P.O. Box
22207, Alexandria, VA 22304.
Telephone, toll free: 1–877–433–7827.
FAX: (703) 605–6794. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call, toll free: 1–877–576–7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: https://www.EDPubs.gov or at
its e-mail address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED
Pubs, be sure to identify this program as
follows: CFDA number 84.184Y.
To obtain a copy from the program
office, contact: Bryan Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza,
Room 10120, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. Telephone: (202) 245–7883 or by
e-mail: bryan.williams@ed.gov. If you
use a TDD, call the Federal Relay
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
39508
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) by contacting the program
contact person listed in section VII of
this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
program.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: July 9, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 9, 2010.
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically using the Electronic Grant
Application System (e-Application)
accessible through the Department’s
e-Grants site. For information (including
dates and times) about how to submit
your application electronically, or in
paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement,
please refer to section IV.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grant funds
may not be used for construction, except
for minor remodeling needed to
accomplish the purposes of this
program, or for medical services, drug
treatment, or rehabilitation except for
pupil services or referral to treatment for
students who are victims of, or
witnesses to, crime or who illegally use
drugs.
We reference additional regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and Central Contractor
Registry: To do business with the
Department of Education, (1) you must
have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN); (2) you
must register both of those numbers
with the Central Contractor Registry
(CCR), the Government’s primary
registrant database; and (3) you must
provide those same numbers on your
application.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow 2–5 weeks for your TIN to
become active.
The CCR registration process may take
five or more business days to complete.
If you are currently registered with the
CCR, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your CCR
registration on an annual basis. This
may take three or more business days to
complete.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under Safe
and Supportive Schools—CFDA
Number 84.184Y must be submitted
electronically using e-Application,
accessible through the Department’s
e-Grants Web site at: https://
e-grants.ed.gov.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
While completing your electronic
application, you will be entering data
online that will be saved into a
database. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
Please note the following:
• You must complete the electronic
submission of your grant application by
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
E-Application system will not accept an
application for this program
[competition] after 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not
wait until the application deadline date
to begin the application process.
• The hours of operation of the
e-Grants Web site are 6:00 a.m. Monday
until 7:00 p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00
a.m. Thursday until 8:00 p.m. Sunday,
Washington, DC time. Please note that,
because of maintenance, the system is
unavailable between 8:00 p.m. on
Sundays and 6:00 a.m. on Mondays, and
between 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays and
6:00 a.m. on Thursdays, Washington,
DC time. Any modifications to these
hours are posted on the e-Grants Web
site.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: The Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
You must attach any narrative sections
of your application as files in a .DOC
(document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF
(Portable Document) format. If you
upload a file type other than the three
file types specified in this paragraph or
submit a password protected file, we
will not review that material.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page limit
requirements described in this notice.
• Prior to submitting your electronic
application, you may wish to print a
copy of it for your records.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgment that will
include a PR/Award number (an
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
identifying number unique to your
application).
• Within three working days after
submitting your electronic application,
fax a signed copy of the SF 424 to the
Application Control Center after
following these steps:
(1) Print SF 424 from e-Application.
(2) The applicant’s Authorizing
Representative must sign this form.
(3) Place the PR/Award number in the
upper right hand corner of the hardcopy signature page of the SF 424.
(4) Fax the signed SF 424 to the
Application Control Center at (202)
245–6272.
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on other forms at a
later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of e-Application Unavailability:
If you are prevented from electronically
submitting your application on the
application deadline date because
e-Application is unavailable, we will
grant you an extension of one business
day to enable you to transmit your
application electronically, by mail, or by
hand delivery. We will grant this
extension if—
(1) You are a registered user of
e-Application and you have initiated an
electronic application for this
competition; and
(2) (a) E-Application is unavailable for
60 minutes or more between the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Washington,
DC time, on the application deadline
date; or
(b) E-Application is unavailable for
any period of time between 3:30 p.m.
and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
on the application deadline date.
We must acknowledge and confirm
these periods of unavailability before
granting you an extension. To request
this extension or to confirm our
acknowledgment of any system
unavailability, you may contact either
(1) the person listed elsewhere in this
notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contact) or (2)
the e-Grants help desk at 1–888–336–
8930. If e-Application is unavailable
due to technical problems with the
system and, therefore, the application
deadline is extended, an e-mail will be
sent to all registered users who have
initiated an e-Application. Extensions
referred to in this section apply only to
the unavailability of e-Application.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
e-Application because—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to
e-Application; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
Internet to submit your application. If
you mail your written statement to the
Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Bryan Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza,
Room 10120, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. FAX: (202) 485–0013.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.184Y), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39509
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application, by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.184Y), 550 12th
Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
grant notification within 15 business days
from the application deadline date, you
should call the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this program are from 34 CFR
75.210 of EDGAR and are listed in the
application package.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
39510
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 131 / Friday, July 9, 2010 / Notices
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The
Department has established the
following Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) performance
measures for Safe and Supportive
Schools—
(a) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the percentage of students
who report current (30-day) alcohol use;
(b) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the percentage of students
who report current (30-day) alcohol use;
(c) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the percentage of students
who report personal harassment or
bullying on school property during the
current school year;
(d) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the percentage of students
who report personal harassment or
bullying on school property during the
current school year;
(e) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience an
improvement in their school safety
score;
(f) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience a
worsening in their school safety score;
(g) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jul 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the number of suspensions
for violent incidents without physical
injury;
(h) Percentage of eligible schools
implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and
Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the number of suspensions
for violent incidents without physical
injury.
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicators of effectiveness
for this program. Consequently, we
advise an applicant for a grant under
this program to give careful
consideration to these measures in
conceptualizing the approach and
evaluation for its proposed project. Each
grantee will be required to provide, in
its annual performance and final
reports, data with regard to these
measures.
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Potomac Center Plaza, Room 10120,
Washington, DC 20202–6450.
Telephone: (202) 245–7883 or by e-mail:
bryan.williams@ed.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: July 6, 2010.
Kevin Jennings,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and DrugFree Schools.
[FR Doc. 2010–16811 Filed 7–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Postsecondary Education;
Overview Information; Off-Campus
Community Service Program; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.116H.
Dates: Applications Available: July 9,
2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 9, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
this program is to provide grants to
institutions of higher education (IHEs)
participating in the Federal Work-Study
Program under title IV, part C of the
Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA) to recruit and
compensate students (including
compensation for time spent in training
and for travel) for part-time, off-campus
employment directly related to
community service. Under section
447(b) of the HEA, funds granted to an
IHE under this program may only be
used to make payments to students
participating in work-study programs.
Priorities: In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(iv), these priorities are from
section 447(b)(3) of the HEA.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2010, these priorities are competitive
preference priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii), we award up to an
additional five points to an application
depending on how well it meets
Competitive Preference Priority 1 and
an additional five points to an
application depending on how well it
meets Competitive Preference Priority 2.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: The
Secretary-gives priority to applications
that propose projects that support
postsecondary students assisting with
early childhood education activities.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: The
Secretary gives priority to applications
that propose projects that support
students assisting with activities in
preparation for emergencies and natural
disasters.
Program Authority: Section 447 of the
HEA; 42 U.S.C. 2756a.
Applicable Regulations: The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 84,
85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $742,500.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 131 (Friday, July 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39504-39510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16811]
[[Page 39504]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools; Overview Information; Safe
and Supportive Schools; Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.184Y.
Dates:
Applications Available: July 9, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 9, 2010.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: Safe and Supportive Schools awards grants to
State educational agencies (SEAs) to support statewide measurement of,
and targeted programmatic interventions to improve, conditions for
learning in order to help schools improve safety and reduce substance
use.
Background: Our Nation's schools should be safe and secure settings
where children can learn and grow to their full potential. Parents want
and expect the schools their children attend to be safe. Unfortunately,
data suggests that significant levels of violence, bullying, and other
problems in schools create conditions that negatively impact learning.
The most recent data on school crime and safety indicate that while the
incidence of violent crimes in schools decreased from 1992 to 2007,
students are now more likely to experience non-fatal crimes (including
theft, simple assault, aggravated assault, rape, and sexual assault) in
school than outside of school. During the 2007-2008 school year, 85
percent of public schools in the United States recorded that at least
one crime occurred at their school.\1\ Based on reported data, bullying
in schools has increased in recent years. In 2001, 14 percent of
students ages 12 through 18 reported that they had been bullied in
school. By 2007, 32 percent of students ages 12 through 18 reported
that they were bullied at school, and 4 percent reported having been
bullied over the Internet (``cyber bullied'').\2\ In addition,
substance use remains a pervasive issue threatening student health. In
2007, 45 percent of high school students reported having consumed at
least one drink of alcohol, while 20 percent reported using marijuana
within the last 30 days.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., Baum, K. and Snyder, T.D. (2009).
Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2009 (NCES 2010-012/NCJ
228478) National Center for Education Statistics, Institute for
Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of
Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
\2\ U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education
Statistics. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2009.
\3\ U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education
Statistics. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disruptive aggressive behaviors such as bullying and violence
create a hostile school environment that may interfere with the
academic performance and mental health of students who are victims or
witnesses. Students who are exposed to high levels of aggressive
behavior and violence at school are more likely to disengage from
school \4\ and to experience clinical levels of mental and emotional
disorders than are students who experience either no or low levels of
violence at schools.\5\ Students who are bullied are also more likely
to become truant from school \6\ and have lower academic
performance.\7\ Research indicates that the majority of school shooters
had been previously bullied.\8\ Disruptive and aggressive behaviors in
the classroom, and the resulting suspensions and expulsions, also
diminish teachers' and students' instructional and learning time. Of
the 271,800 serious disciplinary actions that were taken during the
2007-2008 school year for physical attacks or fights, 79 percent were
out-of-school suspensions lasting five days or more.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Bowen, N.K. & Bowen, G.L. (1999). Effects of crime and
violence in neighborhoods and schools on the school behaviors and
performance of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 319-
342.
\5\ Flannery, D.J., Wester, K.L. & Singer, M.I. (2004). Impact
of exposures to violence in school on child and adolescent mental
health and behavior. Journal of Community Psychology. 32, 559-573.
\6\ Smith, P.K. & Sharp, S. (1994). The problem of school
bullying. In P.K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.) School Bullying: Insights
and Perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1-19.
\7\ Glew, G., Fan, F., Katon, W., Rivara, F., Kernic, M. (2005).
Bullying, psychosocial adjustement, and academic performance in
elementary school. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 159, 1026-1031.
\8\ Leary, M.R., Kowalski, R.M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S.
(2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school
shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202-214.
\9\ U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education
Statistics. 2007-2008 Survey on Crime and Safety (SSOCS), 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure that schools are safe places for students to learn,
schools should understand the issues their communities face and the
conditions that may influence student risk behaviors to best formulate
intervention and prevention strategies. School communities are complex
systems that include multiple stakeholders and interconnecting
environmental factors that influence student health and safety. As
such, comprehensive needs assessments of conditions for learning--
including school engagement, school safety, and the school environment
as elements evaluated--can provide educators with the data support
needed to pursue comprehensive approaches to school reform. One element
of conditions for learning is school engagement, including the
relationships between the members of the school community and the
extent to which members participate in school activities. For example,
research shows that positive student-teacher relationships
characterized by fairness and care are a protective factor against the
initiation and escalation of cigarette smoking and alcohol use, and are
associated with the cessation of weapon-related violence.\10\ In
addition, increases in parent involvement have been associated with
increases in social skills and decreases in behavioral problems among
elementary school children.\11\ Various aspects of the school
environment, such as the physical, academic, and disciplinary
environment, and the presence of health supports, may serve as another
element. For example, research has indicated that student perceptions
of the fairness and clarity of disciplinary procedures are associated
with student delinquency, student victimization, and teacher
victimization.\12\ As schools implement programmatic interventions that
target school engagement, school environment, and other factors related
to conditions for learning, they may need school safety data, a third
element, to help them determine the relative safety of their school
over time and to decide what interventions, if any, might be
appropriate. By monitoring indicators such as the frequency and
severity of student risk behaviors and perceptions of school safety,
schools may identify threats to school safety and then use this
information to implement the appropriate intervention or program to
improve school safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ McNeely, C., Falci, C. (2004). School connectedness and the
transition into and out of health-risk behavior among adolescents: A
comparison of social belonging and teacher support. Journal of
School Health, 74(7), 284-292.
\11\ El Nokali, N., Bachman, H., Vortuba-Drzal, E. (2010).
Parent involvement and children's academic and social development in
elementary school. Child Development, 81(3), 988-1005.
\12\ Gottfredson, G., Gottfredson, D., Payne, A., Gottfredson,
N. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results
from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal
of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 42(4), 412-444.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A comprehensive picture of school health and safety can be created
by utilizing needs assessments that include student perceptions and,
where appropriate, parents and staff
[[Page 39505]]
perceptions, to help schools identify key issues in need of attention.
For example, research demonstrates that teachers' perceptions and
attitudes toward bullying can significantly impact students' acceptance
of and engagement in bullying behaviors.\13\ Efforts to increase
parental engagement may be impacted by preexisting parental attitudes
and perceptions.\14\ Including parents in the assessment process could
help schools to understand these preexisting attitudes, which may
inform schools decisions regarding how best to communicate with
parents, and increase their engagement. Schools might consider
examining parent attitudes of student behaviors as part of a parent
engagement or parent education strategy to combat violence and
substance use; research shows linkages between student perceptions of
parental attitudes and student risk behaviors such as weapons carrying,
schools fights,\15\ alcohol use, and tobacco use.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Chang, L. (2003). Variable effects of children's
aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial leadership as a
function of teacher beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 74(2),
535-548; Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Van Acker,
R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban
elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community
Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.
\14\ Green, C., Walker, J. (2007). Parents' motivations for
involvement in children's education: An empirical test of a
theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Education
Psychology, 99(3), 532-544.
\15\ Orpinas, P., Murray, N., Keider, S. (1999). Parental
influences on students' aggressive behaviors and weapon carrying.
Health Educ Behav, 26, 774-787.
\16\ Simons-Morton, B., Haynie, D., Crump, D., Eitel, P.,
Saylor, K. (2001). Peer and Parent Influences on Smoking and
Drinking among Early Adolescents. Health Educ Behav, 28, 95-107.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe and Supportive Schools will provide grants to support
statewide measurement of, and targeted programmatic interventions to
improve, the conditions for learning by helping schools to reduce
substance use and improve safety by managing the broad continuum of
detrimental behaviors, including disruptive behaviors, violent crime,
and substance use.
In the following sections, we announce an absolute priority, a
competitive preference priority, and an invitational priority, and
requirements for this competition as well as define key terms used in
this notice.
Absolute Priority: We are establishing this absolute priority for
the FY 2010 grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions
Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider
only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Grants to States to Improve Conditions for Learning.
This priority supports grants to SEAs for projects that take a
systematic approach to improving conditions for learning in eligible
schools through improved measurement systems that assess conditions for
learning, which must include school safety, and the implementation of
programmatic interventions that address problems identified by data.
Competitive Preference Priority: We are establishing this
competitive preference priority for the FY 2010 grant competition and
any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition in accordance with section 437(d)(1)
of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award an additional 5 points to an
application that meets this priority.
This priority is:
Inclusion of School Engagement and School Environment in Needs
Assessments Measuring Conditions for Learning (5 points).
To meet this priority, the applicant must propose to implement a
measurement system that uses valid and reliable instruments to gather
comprehensive data related to school engagement and school environment
from students to assess conditions for learning.
Invitational Priority: We are establishing this invitational
priority for the FY 2010 grant competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we do not give an application
that meets this invitational priority a competitive or absolute
preference over other applications.
This priority is:
Family and Staff Inclusion in Needs Assessments Measuring School
Engagement
Under this priority, we are interested in applications from SEAs
that propose to implement a measurement system that uses valid and
reliable instruments to gather comprehensive data from school staff and
from students' families or guardians in order to assess school
engagement.
Program Requirements: The following requirements apply to projects
funded under this competition:
1. Measurement System
(a) Each grantee must implement a measurement system that--
(1) Collects survey data and incident data (as defined in this
notice) from participating local educational agencies (LEAs) that have
a combined student enrollment of no less than 20 percent of the State's
total student enrollment;
(2) Collects student survey data from eligible schools to assess
conditions for learning, which will include, at a minimum, school
safety;
(3) Uses survey sampling procedures that collect data from a
representative sample of the students in grades 9 and above within the
eligible schools surveyed;
(4) Uses valid and reliable survey instruments (as defined in this
notice);
(5) Collects the required survey data from all eligible schools in
participating LEAs within the first 12 months of the project period and
again during the final 12 months of the project period;
(6) Collects the required survey data from each eligible school
selected to implement programmatic interventions (as defined in this
notice) in each year of the project period;
(7) Collects incident data (as defined in this notice) from all
eligible schools in participating LEAs in each year of the project
period; and
(8) Allows the data to be summarized in ways that can be used to
engage school staff and families or guardians in discussions of the
results.
2. School Safety Scores
(a) Each grantee must generate a school safety score (as defined in
this notice) for each eligible school in its participating LEAs, using
both student survey data and incident data (as defined in this notice)
that is disaggregated by school building, within the first 12 months of
the project period and again during the final 12 months of the project
period;
(b) Additionally, each grantee must generate a school safety score
for each eligible school selected to implement programmatic
interventions (as defined in this notice), using both student survey
data and incident data (as defined in this notice) that is
disaggregated at the school building level, in each year of the project
period; and
(c) Each grantee must publicly report school safety scores for each
eligible school in its participating LEAs after the initial year and
final year of the project period, and for each year of the project
period for eligible schools selected to implement programmatic
interventions. To satisfy this requirement, each grantee must--
(i) Prior to the start of each school year, post school safety
scores, generated from current data, on the
[[Page 39506]]
Internet in a manner that is easily accessible to the general public;
and
(ii) Within the first 12 months of the project period, post the
formula used to generate school safety scores on the Internet in a
manner that is easily accessible to the general public.
3. Implementing Programmatic Interventions and Technical Assistance
Strategies
Each grantee must--
(a) In consultation with its participating LEAs, using criteria
that incorporate student survey data and incident data from the
measurement system, the list of persistently lowest-achieving schools
(as defined in this notice), or both, select eligible schools in need
of programmatic interventions (as defined in this notice);
(b) In consultation with its participating LEAs, implement
programmatic interventions (as defined in this notice) in a number of
eligible schools, located in participating LEAs, totaling no more than
20 percent of the total number of eligible schools in the State, to
ensure that programmatic interventions are of sufficient size and
scope;
(c) Provide its participating LEAs and eligible schools with
technical assistance in using survey data to drive school improvement,
including using data to assess areas in need of improvement, and
identifying programmatic interventions to address these areas; and
(d) Use at least 80 percent of grant funds awarded in project years
two, three, and four to carry out programmatic interventions (as
defined in this notice) and related technical assistance.
Note: For the purposes of these program requirements, grantees
may implement programmatic interventions that serve any student
within an eligible school, including those students in grades 8 and
below. Grantees are not required to survey students in grades 8 and
below.
Application Requirements: The following requirements apply to all
applications submitted under this competition. Applications that fail
to meet any one of these requirements will not be read or scored. In
its application, an applicant must--
(a) Identify the LEAs that will participate in the proposed
project. If the LEAs that will participate have not been identified by
the time the application is submitted, the applicant must provide a
description of the process it will use to select LEAs to participate;
(b) Describe the process it will use to consult with participating
LEAs to develop a formula to be used to generate school safety scores
required under the program;
(c) Describe its plan to maintain, improve, or build State-level
capacity to conduct the following activities:
(1) Developing, adapting, or adopting valid and reliable survey
instruments.
(2) Administering surveys using established sampling and
administration methodologies to ensure adequate school-level
representation and high response rates.
(3) Tracking costs by major component (e.g., student survey data
collection).
(4) Safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of the survey
respondents and complying with the requirements of the Protection of
Pupil Rights Amendment, 20 U.S.C. 1232h; 34 CFR part 98 in collecting
survey data and with the requirements of the Family Educational Rights
and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. 1232g; 34 CFR part 99 in collecting any
survey or incident data containing personally identifiable information;
(d) Provide a brief description of the specific constructs to be
included on any survey instruments, including constructs used to assess
school safety;
(e) Explain the strategies it will use to identify and address any
anticipated challenges (including statutory or regulatory requirements)
involved in collecting the required data in the participating LEAs. At
a minimum, each applicant must identify and address anticipated
barriers to obtaining high response rates for surveys;
(f) Describe how it will use the data collected from the
measurement system and the school safety scores generated from such
data to engage families and guardians in a discussion of the findings;
to examine how a school's setting, policies, and practices promote or
inhibit student safety from physical violence; and to examine how a
school's setting, policies, and practices might reduce disruptive
behaviors while reducing suspensions and expulsions;
(g) Describe how it will provide technical assistance to
participating LEAs and their schools on the use, meaning, and
application of required survey data and incident data (as defined in
this notice);
(h) Describe the strategies it will use to consult with
participating LEAs to identify and implement programmatic interventions
(as defined in this notice) in identified schools that respond to needs
identified by data collected through the measurement system; and
(i) Comply with the requirements of any evaluation of the program
conducted by the Department, including by sharing all data collected
through the measurement system with the Department or an evaluator
selected by the Department.
Administrative Requirement: Although programmatic interventions
will be delivered at the LEA level, the SEA must retain administrative
direction and fiscal control for the project.
Definitions: We are establishing these definitions for the FY 2010
grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from
the list of unfunded applicants from this competition, in accordance
with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Conditions for learning means the school setting, which includes,
at a minimum, school safety, and which may include school environment
and school engagement.
Eligible school means any school that includes 9th grade, 10th
grade, 11th grade, or 12th grade.
Incident data means data from incident reports by school officials
including, but not limited to, truancy rates; the frequency,
seriousness, and incidence of violence and drug-related offenses
resulting in suspensions and expulsions; and the incidence and
prevalence of drug use and violence by students in schools.
Moderate evidence means evidence from previous studies with designs
that can support causal conclusions (i.e., studies with high internal
validity) but have limited generalizability (i.e., moderate external
validity) or from studies with high external validity but moderate
internal validity.
Persistently lowest-achieving schools means, as determined by the
State, (a)(1) any Title I school in improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring that (i) is among the lowest-achieving five percent of
Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring or
the lowest-achieving five Title I schools in improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring in the State, whichever number of schools is
greater; or (ii) is a high school that has had a graduation rate as
defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is less than 60 percent over a number
of years; and (2) any secondary school that is eligible for, but does
not receive, Title I funds that (i) is among the lowest-achieving five
percent of secondary schools or the lowest-achieving five secondary
schools in the State that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I
funds, whichever number of schools is greater; or (ii) is a high school
that has had a graduation rate as defined in 34 CFR 200.19(b) that is
less than 60 percent over a number of years.
[[Page 39507]]
Programmatic intervention means any program, strategy, activity,
service, or policy for school or community settings that prevents and
reduces youth crime, violence, harassment, bullying, and the illegal
use of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco; creates positive relationships
between students and adults; promotes parent and community engagement;
promotes the character, social, and emotional development of students;
provides or improves access to social services; enables school
communities to manage student behaviors effectively while lowering
suspensions and expulsions; or provides other needed social and
emotional supports for students. Programmatic interventions should be
based on the best available evidence, including, where available,
strong or moderate evidence (as defined in this notice).
School engagement means participation in school-related activities,
and the quality of school relationships, which may include
relationships between and among administrators, teachers, parents and
students.
School environment means the extent to which school settings
promote student safety and student health, which may include topics
such as the physical plant, the academic environment, available
physical and mental health supports and services, and the fairness and
adequacy of disciplinary procedures, as supported by relevant research
and an assessment of validity.
School safety means the safety of school settings, based on factors
which may include topics such as the presence and use of illegal drugs
(including alcohol use), bullying, and violence, as supported by
relevant research and an assessment of validity.
School safety score means a figure calculated with a formula,
developed by the State in consultation with LEAs and applied uniformly
to all eligible schools in participating LEAs within the State, that
uses both the survey data and incident data (as defined in this notice)
collected by a measurement system, and that facilitates school
comparisons.
Strong evidence means evidence from studies with designs that can
support causal conclusions (i.e., studies with high internal validity),
and studies that, in total, include enough of the range of participants
and settings to support scaling up to the State, regional, or national
level (i.e., studies with high external validity).
Valid and reliable survey instruments mean intact sets of survey
questions that have been demonstrated statistically to produce results
that are both consistently and accurately measuring appropriate
concepts of interest for the age groups surveyed.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, definitions,
requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary
to exempt from rulemaking requirements, regulations governing the first
grant competition under a new or substantially revised program
authority. This is the first grant competition for Safe and Supportive
Schools and, therefore qualifies for this exemption. In order to ensure
timely grant awards, the Secretary has decided to forgo public comment
on the priorities, requirements, and definitions under section
437(d)(1) of GEPA. These priorities, requirements, and definitions will
apply to the FY 2010 grant competition and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 80, 81,
82, 84, 85, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The regulations in 34 CFR part 299.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $27,300,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2011 from the list of
unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $1,000,000-$12,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $1 million per year for a State
with up to 199,999 students enrolled; $2.5 million per year for a State
with 200,000-499,999 students enrolled; $3.5 million per year for a
State with 500,000--999,999 students enrolled; $6 million per year for
a State with 1,000,000-1,999,999 students enrolled; and $12 million per
year for a State with at least 2,000,000 students enrolled. Award
ranges are based on 2008-2009 school year enrollment data submitted by
SEAs through the National Center for Education Statistics.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5-7.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice. The Department will decide on the size of each SEA's award
based on a detailed review of the budget the SEA requests,
considering such factors as the size of the State, level of LEA
participation, and the proposed activities.
Project Period: Up to 48 months, of which no more than 12 months
may be used for planning and program design.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs, as defined by section 9101(41) of the
ESEA.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Participation by Private School Children and Teachers. Section
9501 of the ESEA requires that SEAs, LEAs, or other entities receiving
funds under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act provide
for the equitable participation of private school children, their
teachers, and other educational personnel in private schools located in
geographic areas served by the grant recipient.
In order to ensure that grant program activities address the needs
of private school children, the applicant must engage in timely and
meaningful consultation with appropriate private school officials
during the design and development of the proposed program. This
consultation must take place before the applicant makes any decision
that affects the opportunities of eligible private school children,
teachers, and other educational personnel to participate in grant
program activities.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an
application package via the Internet, from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the Internet, use the following address:
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or call the following:
ED Pubs, U.S. Department of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA
22304. Telephone, toll free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call, toll
free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: https://www.EDPubs.gov or at its e-mail address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application from ED Pubs, be sure to identify
this program as follows: CFDA number 84.184Y.
To obtain a copy from the program office, contact: Bryan Williams,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center
Plaza, Room 10120, Washington, DC 20202-6450. Telephone: (202) 245-7883
or by e-mail: bryan.williams@ed.gov. If you use a TDD, call the Federal
Relay
[[Page 39508]]
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or computer diskette) by contacting the program contact person listed
in section VII of this notice.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this program.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: July 9, 2010.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 9, 2010.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically using the Electronic Grant Application System (e-
Application) accessible through the Department's e-Grants site. For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
5. Funding Restrictions: Grant funds may not be used for
construction, except for minor remodeling needed to accomplish the
purposes of this program, or for medical services, drug treatment, or
rehabilitation except for pupil services or referral to treatment for
students who are victims of, or witnesses to, crime or who illegally
use drugs.
We reference additional regulations outlining funding restrictions
in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and Central Contractor Registry: To do business with the
Department of Education, (1) you must have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN); (2)
you must register both of those numbers with the Central Contractor
Registry (CCR), the Government's primary registrant database; and (3)
you must provide those same numbers on your application.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one business day.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
The CCR registration process may take five or more business days to
complete. If you are currently registered with the CCR, you may not
need to make any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN
associated with your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will
need to update your CCR registration on an annual basis. This may take
three or more business days to complete.
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this program must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in
this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under Safe and Supportive Schools--CFDA
Number 84.184Y must be submitted electronically using e-Application,
accessible through the Department's e-Grants Web site at: https://e-grants.ed.gov.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
While completing your electronic application, you will be entering
data online that will be saved into a database. You may not e-mail an
electronic copy of a grant application to us.
Please note the following:
You must complete the electronic submission of your grant
application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. E-Application system will not accept an application for
this program [competition] after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application deadline date to begin the
application process.
The hours of operation of the e-Grants Web site are 6:00
a.m. Monday until 7:00 p.m. Wednesday; and 6:00 a.m. Thursday until
8:00 p.m. Sunday, Washington, DC time. Please note that, because of
maintenance, the system is unavailable between 8:00 p.m. on Sundays and
6:00 a.m. on Mondays, and between 7:00 p.m. on Wednesdays and 6:00 a.m.
on Thursdays, Washington, DC time. Any modifications to these hours are
posted on the e-Grants Web site.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: The
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications. You must attach any narrative sections of your
application as files in a .DOC (document), .RTF (rich text), or .PDF
(Portable Document) format. If you upload a file type other than the
three file types specified in this paragraph or submit a password
protected file, we will not review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page
limit requirements described in this notice.
Prior to submitting your electronic application, you may
wish to print a copy of it for your records.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive an automatic acknowledgment that will include a PR/Award number
(an
[[Page 39509]]
identifying number unique to your application).
Within three working days after submitting your electronic
application, fax a signed copy of the SF 424 to the Application Control
Center after following these steps:
(1) Print SF 424 from e-Application.
(2) The applicant's Authorizing Representative must sign this form.
(3) Place the PR/Award number in the upper right hand corner of the
hard-copy signature page of the SF 424.
(4) Fax the signed SF 424 to the Application Control Center at
(202) 245-6272.
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
other forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of e-Application
Unavailability: If you are prevented from electronically submitting
your application on the application deadline date because e-Application
is unavailable, we will grant you an extension of one business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically, by mail, or by
hand delivery. We will grant this extension if--
(1) You are a registered user of e-Application and you have
initiated an electronic application for this competition; and
(2) (a) E-Application is unavailable for 60 minutes or more between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date; or
(b) E-Application is unavailable for any period of time between
3:30 p.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date.
We must acknowledge and confirm these periods of unavailability
before granting you an extension. To request this extension or to
confirm our acknowledgment of any system unavailability, you may
contact either (1) the person listed elsewhere in this notice under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contact) or (2) the e-
Grants help desk at 1-888-336-8930. If e-Application is unavailable due
to technical problems with the system and, therefore, the application
deadline is extended, an e-mail will be sent to all registered users
who have initiated an e-Application. Extensions referred to in this
section apply only to the unavailability of e-Application.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through e-Application because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
e-Application; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application. If you
mail your written statement to the Department, it must be postmarked no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Bryan Williams, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center
Plaza, Room 10120, Washington, DC 20202-6450. FAX: (202) 485-0013.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.184Y), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application, by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.184Y), 550 12th Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this grant notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from 34 CFR 75.210 of EDGAR and are listed in the application package.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN). We may notify you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in
[[Page 39510]]
the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and
other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your
approved application as part of your binding commitments under the
grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your project period, you must submit a
final performance report, including financial information, as directed
by the Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an
annual performance report that provides the most current performance
and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements
on reporting, please go to https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The Department has established the
following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA)
performance measures for Safe and Supportive Schools--
(a) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the percentage of students who report current (30-day)
alcohol use;
(b) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the percentage of students who report current (30-day)
alcohol use;
(c) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the percentage of students who report personal harassment
or bullying on school property during the current school year;
(d) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the percentage of students who report personal harassment
or bullying on school property during the current school year;
(e) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience an
improvement in their school safety score;
(f) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience a
worsening in their school safety score;
(g) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience a
decrease in the number of suspensions for violent incidents without
physical injury;
(h) Percentage of eligible schools implementing programmatic
interventions funded by Safe and Supportive Schools that experience an
increase in the number of suspensions for violent incidents without
physical injury.
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of
effectiveness for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant
for a grant under this program to give careful consideration to these
measures in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation for its
proposed project. Each grantee will be required to provide, in its
annual performance and final reports, data with regard to these
measures.
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Potomac Center Plaza, Room 10120,
Washington, DC 20202-6450. Telephone: (202) 245-7883 or by e-mail:
bryan.williams@ed.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: July 6, 2010.
Kevin Jennings,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
[FR Doc. 2010-16811 Filed 7-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P