Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 11.14, Entitled “Trading Halts Due to Extraordinary Volatility.”, 39084-39086 [2010-16412]

Download as PDF 39084 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2010 / Notices A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this proposed rule change is to conform the speculative position limits for certain security futures products to the requirements of the CEA. This change will achieve that result. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 4 in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to protect investors and the public interest, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition OneChicago does not believe that the proposed rule change will have an impact on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Comments on the OneChicago proposed rule change have not been solicited and none have been received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(7) of the Act.5 Within 60 days of the date of effectiveness of the proposed rule change, the Commission, after consultation with the CFTC, may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change and require that the proposed rule change be refiled in accordance with the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Act.6 cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–OC–2010–02 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–62418; File No. SR–EDGX– 2010–05] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 11.14, Entitled ‘‘Trading Halts Due to Extraordinary Volatility.’’ June 30, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on June 30, 2010, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the All submissions should refer to File Securities and Exchange Commission Number SR–OC–2010–02. This file (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule number should be included on the change as described in Items I, II, and subject line if e-mail is used. To help the III below, which Items have been Commission process and review your prepared by the Exchange. The comments more efficiently, please use Commission is publishing this notice to only one method. The Commission will solicit comments on the proposed rule post all comments on the Commission’s change from interested persons. Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Statement of the Terms of Substance of submission, all subsequent the Proposed Rule Change amendments, all written statements The Exchange is proposing to amend with respect to the proposed rule EDGX Rule 11.14, entitled ‘‘Trading change that are filed with the Halts Due to Extraordinary Volatility’’ to Commission, and all written add additional securities to the pilot communications relating to the rule. The text of the proposed rule proposed rule change between the change is available at the Exchange’s Commission and any person, other than Web site at https://www.directedge.com, those that may be withheld from the at the principal office of the Exchange, public in accordance with the and at the Commission’s Public provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Reference Room. available for Web site viewing and II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s printing in the Commission’s Public Statement of the Purpose of, and Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Washington, DC 20549, on official Change business days between the hours of 10 In its filing with the Commission, the a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for copying at the principal office of the the proposed rule change and discussed OneChicago. All comments received any comments it received on the will be posted without change; the proposed rule change. The text of these Commission does not edit personal statements may be examined at the identifying information from places specified in Item IV below. The submissions. You should submit only Exchange has prepared summaries, set information that you wish to make forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of available publicly. All submissions the most significant parts of such should refer to File Number SR–OC– statements. 2010–02 and should be submitted on or A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s before August 6, 2010. Statement of the Purpose of, and For the Commission, by the Division of Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Change 7 authority. Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–16429 Filed 7–6–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7). 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to add securities included in the Russell 1000® Index 4 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Jul 06, 2010 1 15 7 17 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(73). Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 17 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 07JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2010 / Notices cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES (‘‘Russell 1000’’) and specified Exchange Traded Products (‘‘ETP’’) to the pilot rule. For purposes of this filing, ETPs include Exchange Traded Funds (‘‘ETF’’),3 Exchange Traded Vehicles (‘‘ETV’’),4 and Exchange Traded Notes (‘‘ETN’’).5 EDGX Rule 11.14 was approved by the Commission on June 10, 2010 on a pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.6 As the Exchange noted in its filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, during the pilot period, the Exchange would continue to assess whether additional securities need to be added and whether the parameters of the rule would need to be modified to accommodate trading characteristics of different securities. Currently, the pilot list of securities is all securities included in the S&P 500® Index (‘‘S&P 500’’). As noted in comment letters to the original filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, concerns were raised that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the pilot rule was too narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities that experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be included in the pilot. In response to these concerns, various exchanges and national securities associations have collectively determined to expand the list of pilot securities. As part of a coordinated filing with the other markets, the Exchange proposes to add the securities included in the Russell 1000 and specified ETPs to the pilot beginning in July 2010, subject to Commission approval. The Exchange believes that adding these securities would address concerns that the scope of the pilot may be too narrow, while at the same time recognizing that during the pilot period, the markets will continue to review whether and when to add additional securities to the pilot and whether the 3 An ETF is an open-ended registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that has received certain exemptive relief from the SEC to allow secondary market trading in the ETF shares. ETFs are generally index-based products, in that each ETF holds a portfolio of securities that is intended to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying benchmark index. 4 An ETV tracks the underlying performance of an asset or index, allowing investors exposure to underlying assets such as futures contracts, commodities, and currency without actually trading futures or taking physical delivery of the underlying asset. An ETV is traded intraday like an ETF. An ETV is an open-ended trust or partnership unit that is registered under the Securities Act of 1933. 5 An ETN is a senior unsecured debt obligation designed to track the total return of an underlying index, benchmark or strategy, minus investor fees. ETNs are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are redeemable to the issuer. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 2010) (SR–EDGX–2010–01). VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Jul 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 parameters of the rule should be adjusted for different securities. In particular, the Exchange proposes to add securities included in the Russell 1000 because the Exchange believes that the securities included in that index have similar trading characteristics to securities included in the S&P 500 (many of which are the same securities) and therefore the existing 10% price movement applicable before invoking a trading pause may be appropriate for the Russell 1000 securities. In addition, the Exchange, in consultation with other markets, proposes to add to the pilot a selected list of ETPs. The proposed pilot list of ETPs was developed by first identifying all ETPs across multiple asset classes and issuers, including domestic equity, international equity, fixed income, currency, and commodities and futures. Next, leveraged ETPs were excluded and sorted by notional consolidated average daily volume (‘‘CADV’’) using year-to-date CADV ending May 5, 2010, multiplied by the closing price on May 5, 2010. Then, those symbols, including inverse ETPs, that trade over $2,000,000 CADV year to date through May 5, 2010, were selected. To ensure that ETPs that track similar benchmarks but that do not meet this volume criterion do not become subject to pricing volatility when a component security is the subject of a trading pause, the Exchange proposes to include certain nonleveraged ETPs that have traded below this volume criterion, but that track the same benchmark as an ETP that does meet the volume criterion. The proposed list of ETPs identify those ETPs that have component securities that largely track the securities included in the S&P 500 and Russell 1000. Accordingly, if an S&P 500 or Russell 1000 security experiences a trading pause, any resulting price volatility in a related ETP, regardless of the CADV of the ETP, would also be subject to a trading pause trigger. As with the proposal to add the Russell 1000 securities, the proposed ETPs were selected because they were consistent with the existing 10% price movement before invoking a trading pause for ETPs with these characteristics. The Exchange does not believe that the 10% price movement is an appropriate threshold for leveraged ETPs because by definition, leveraged ETPs are based on multiples of price movements in the underlying index. Accordingly, a 10% percent price movement in a leveraged ETP may not signify extraordinary volatility. Because the Exchange is not proposing to adopt revised price movement thresholds at this time, the PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39085 Exchange is therefore not proposing to include leveraged ETPs for now. As noted above, during the pilot, the Exchange will continue to re-assess, in consultation with other markets, whether specific ETPs should be added or removed from the pilot list. The Exchange will also assess whether the parameters for invoking a trading pause continue to be the appropriate standard and whether the parameters should be modified. To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to amend supplementary material .05 to Rule 11.14 to provide that the pilot applies to all securities in the S&P 500, securities in the Russell 1000, as well as specified ETPs. 2. Statutory Basis Approval of the rule change proposed in this submission is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.7 In particular, the proposed change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,8 because it would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change is also designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 9 of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in that it promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to pause trading in a security when there are significant price movements. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes any burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 9 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). 8 15 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 39086 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 7, 2010 / Notices cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.10 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning all aspects of the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. The Commission notes that ETF trades constituted a substantial majority of the trades that were cancelled on May 6, and the proposed amendments would bring certain ETFs within the scope of the trading pause pilot for the first time. The Commission solicits comment regarding the inclusion of ETFs within the trading pause pilot. The Commission requests comment in particular on the implications of including in the trading pause pilot ETFs on broad-based indices that also underlie options and futures products. What are the potential benefits and risks of including those ETFs in the pilot under circumstances where other products based on the same index may not be subject to any trading pause, or may be subject to a different type of trading pause? Are existing mechanisms available in the markets for those other products sufficient to address any crossmarket linkage concerns? What are the potential effects on price discovery and trading behavior in the different markets? Similarly, the Commission solicits comments on the potential benefits and risks of excluding such ETFs from the pilot, particularly under circumstances where the securities underlying the ETF are included in the pilot. If there are trading pauses for the component securities of an index but not for an ETF based on that index, what consequences might that have for the ETF or for other products based on that index? If there are trading pauses in an ETF but not in the stocks that underlie that ETF, what 10 The Commission notes that the Exchange has requested accelerated approval of the filing. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:28 Jul 06, 2010 Jkt 220001 consequences might that have for the underlying stocks or other products? What are the potential effects on price discovery for the ETF, the underlying stocks and other products? Are there other market-based characteristics or metrics that should be considered for purposes of determining which ETFs should be included in the trading pause pilot, or for re-calibrating particular features of the trading pause? In addition, the Commission solicits comments regarding the operation of the trading pause pilot to date with respect to stocks in the S&P 500. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–EDGX–2010–05 on the subject line. should refer to File Number SR–EDGX– 2010–05 and should be submitted on or before July 19, 2010.11 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.12 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–16412 Filed 7–6–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–62415; File No. SR–BX– 2010–044] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. To Amend IM– 4120–3 June 30, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Paper Comments notice is hereby given that on June 30, • Send paper comments in triplicate 2010, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule Washington, DC 20549–1090. change as described in Items I, II, and All submissions should refer to File III below, which Items have been Number SR–EDGX–2010–05. This file prepared by the Exchange. The number should be included on the Commission is publishing this notice to subject line if e-mail is used. To help the solicit comments on the proposed rule Commission process and review your change from interested persons. comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s post all comments on the Commission’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ The Exchange is filing this proposed rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the rule change to amend BX IM–4120–3 to submission, all subsequent add securities included in the Russell amendments, all written statements 1000® Index (‘‘Russell 1000’’) and with respect to the proposed rule specified Exchange Traded Products change that are filed with the (‘‘ETP’’) to the definition of Circuit Commission, and all written Breaker Securities. communications relating to the The text of the proposed rule change proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than is below. Proposed new language is underlined and proposed deletions are those that may be withheld from the in brackets. public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be * * * * * available for Web site viewing and 4120. Trading Halts printing in the Commission’s Public (a)–(c) No change. Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., IM–4120–1. No change. Washington, DC 20549, on official IM–4120–2. No change. business days between the hours of 10 IM–4120–3. Circuit Breaker Securities a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing Pilot The provisions of paragraph (a)(11) of also will be available for inspection and this Rule shall be in effect during a pilot copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will 11 The Commission believes that a 10-day be posted without change; the comment period is reasonable, given the urgency of Commission does not edit personal the matter. It will provide adequate time for identifying information from comment. submissions. You should submit only 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). information that you wish to make 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. publicly available. All submissions PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39084-39086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16412]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62418; File No. SR-EDGX-2010-05]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 11.14, Entitled 
``Trading Halts Due to Extraordinary Volatility.''

June 30, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on June 30, 2010, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend EDGX Rule 11.14, entitled 
``Trading Halts Due to Extraordinary Volatility'' to add additional 
securities to the pilot rule. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available at the Exchange's Web site at https://www.directedge.com, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.14 to add securities 
included in the Russell 1000[supreg] Index

[[Page 39085]]

(``Russell 1000'') and specified Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'') to 
the pilot rule. For purposes of this filing, ETPs include Exchange 
Traded Funds (``ETF''),\3\ Exchange Traded Vehicles (``ETV''),\4\ and 
Exchange Traded Notes (``ETN'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ An ETF is an open-ended registered investment company under 
the Investment Company Act of 1940 that has received certain 
exemptive relief from the SEC to allow secondary market trading in 
the ETF shares. ETFs are generally index-based products, in that 
each ETF holds a portfolio of securities that is intended to provide 
investment results that, before fees and expenses, generally 
correspond to the price and yield performance of the underlying 
benchmark index.
    \4\ An ETV tracks the underlying performance of an asset or 
index, allowing investors exposure to underlying assets such as 
futures contracts, commodities, and currency without actually 
trading futures or taking physical delivery of the underlying asset. 
An ETV is traded intraday like an ETF. An ETV is an open-ended trust 
or partnership unit that is registered under the Securities Act of 
1933.
    \5\ An ETN is a senior unsecured debt obligation designed to 
track the total return of an underlying index, benchmark or 
strategy, minus investor fees. ETNs are registered under the 
Securities Act of 1933 and are redeemable to the issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EDGX Rule 11.14 was approved by the Commission on June 10, 2010 on 
a pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.\6\ As the Exchange noted in 
its filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, during the pilot period, the 
Exchange would continue to assess whether additional securities need to 
be added and whether the parameters of the rule would need to be 
modified to accommodate trading characteristics of different 
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 
2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the pilot list of securities is all securities included 
in the S&P 500[supreg] Index (``S&P 500''). As noted in comment letters 
to the original filing to adopt EDGX Rule 11.14, concerns were raised 
that including only securities in the S&P 500 in the pilot rule was too 
narrow. In particular, commenters noted that securities that 
experienced volatility on May 6, 2010, including ETFs, should be 
included in the pilot.
    In response to these concerns, various exchanges and national 
securities associations have collectively determined to expand the list 
of pilot securities. As part of a coordinated filing with the other 
markets, the Exchange proposes to add the securities included in the 
Russell 1000 and specified ETPs to the pilot beginning in July 2010, 
subject to Commission approval. The Exchange believes that adding these 
securities would address concerns that the scope of the pilot may be 
too narrow, while at the same time recognizing that during the pilot 
period, the markets will continue to review whether and when to add 
additional securities to the pilot and whether the parameters of the 
rule should be adjusted for different securities.
    In particular, the Exchange proposes to add securities included in 
the Russell 1000 because the Exchange believes that the securities 
included in that index have similar trading characteristics to 
securities included in the S&P 500 (many of which are the same 
securities) and therefore the existing 10% price movement applicable 
before invoking a trading pause may be appropriate for the Russell 1000 
securities.
    In addition, the Exchange, in consultation with other markets, 
proposes to add to the pilot a selected list of ETPs. The proposed 
pilot list of ETPs was developed by first identifying all ETPs across 
multiple asset classes and issuers, including domestic equity, 
international equity, fixed income, currency, and commodities and 
futures. Next, leveraged ETPs were excluded and sorted by notional 
consolidated average daily volume (``CADV'') using year-to-date CADV 
ending May 5, 2010, multiplied by the closing price on May 5, 2010. 
Then, those symbols, including inverse ETPs, that trade over $2,000,000 
CADV year to date through May 5, 2010, were selected. To ensure that 
ETPs that track similar benchmarks but that do not meet this volume 
criterion do not become subject to pricing volatility when a component 
security is the subject of a trading pause, the Exchange proposes to 
include certain non-leveraged ETPs that have traded below this volume 
criterion, but that track the same benchmark as an ETP that does meet 
the volume criterion.
    The proposed list of ETPs identify those ETPs that have component 
securities that largely track the securities included in the S&P 500 
and Russell 1000. Accordingly, if an S&P 500 or Russell 1000 security 
experiences a trading pause, any resulting price volatility in a 
related ETP, regardless of the CADV of the ETP, would also be subject 
to a trading pause trigger. As with the proposal to add the Russell 
1000 securities, the proposed ETPs were selected because they were 
consistent with the existing 10% price movement before invoking a 
trading pause for ETPs with these characteristics. The Exchange does 
not believe that the 10% price movement is an appropriate threshold for 
leveraged ETPs because by definition, leveraged ETPs are based on 
multiples of price movements in the underlying index. Accordingly, a 
10% percent price movement in a leveraged ETP may not signify 
extraordinary volatility. Because the Exchange is not proposing to 
adopt revised price movement thresholds at this time, the Exchange is 
therefore not proposing to include leveraged ETPs for now.
    As noted above, during the pilot, the Exchange will continue to re-
assess, in consultation with other markets, whether specific ETPs 
should be added or removed from the pilot list. The Exchange will also 
assess whether the parameters for invoking a trading pause continue to 
be the appropriate standard and whether the parameters should be 
modified.
    To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to amend supplementary 
material .05 to Rule 11.14 to provide that the pilot applies to all 
securities in the S&P 500, securities in the Russell 1000, as well as 
specified ETPs.
2. Statutory Basis
    Approval of the rule change proposed in this submission is 
consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities 
exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of 
the Act.\7\ In particular, the proposed change is consistent with 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ because it would promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the 
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, protect investors and the public interest. The proposed 
rule change is also designed to support the principles of Section 
11A(a)(1) \9\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition 
among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule meets these requirements in that it 
promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to pause 
trading in a security when there are significant price movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes 
any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

[[Page 39086]]

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Commission notes that the Exchange has requested 
accelerated approval of the filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning all aspects of the foregoing, including whether 
the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
    The Commission notes that ETF trades constituted a substantial 
majority of the trades that were cancelled on May 6, and the proposed 
amendments would bring certain ETFs within the scope of the trading 
pause pilot for the first time. The Commission solicits comment 
regarding the inclusion of ETFs within the trading pause pilot. The 
Commission requests comment in particular on the implications of 
including in the trading pause pilot ETFs on broad-based indices that 
also underlie options and futures products. What are the potential 
benefits and risks of including those ETFs in the pilot under 
circumstances where other products based on the same index may not be 
subject to any trading pause, or may be subject to a different type of 
trading pause? Are existing mechanisms available in the markets for 
those other products sufficient to address any cross-market linkage 
concerns? What are the potential effects on price discovery and trading 
behavior in the different markets?
    Similarly, the Commission solicits comments on the potential 
benefits and risks of excluding such ETFs from the pilot, particularly 
under circumstances where the securities underlying the ETF are 
included in the pilot. If there are trading pauses for the component 
securities of an index but not for an ETF based on that index, what 
consequences might that have for the ETF or for other products based on 
that index? If there are trading pauses in an ETF but not in the stocks 
that underlie that ETF, what consequences might that have for the 
underlying stocks or other products? What are the potential effects on 
price discovery for the ETF, the underlying stocks and other products?
    Are there other market-based characteristics or metrics that should 
be considered for purposes of determining which ETFs should be included 
in the trading pause pilot, or for re-calibrating particular features 
of the trading pause?
    In addition, the Commission solicits comments regarding the 
operation of the trading pause pilot to date with respect to stocks in 
the S&P 500.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-EDGX-2010-05 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2010-05. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2010-05 and should be 
submitted on or before July 19, 2010.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Commission believes that a 10-day comment period is 
reasonable, given the urgency of the matter. It will provide 
adequate time for comment.
    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16412 Filed 7-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.