Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual Exemptions Involving D-11448, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., 2010-19; D-11514, Citigroup Inc. and its Affiliates (Citigroup or the Applicant), 2010-20; D-11527, Barclays California Corporation (Barcal), 2010-21; D-11533 and D-11534, Respectively, CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for Represented Employees and CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for Non-Represented Employees (Together, the Plans), 2010-22, 38551-38557 [2010-16097]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
hazardous substances at or from the
Meyers Landfill Site, a former
municipal waste disposal facility
located on National Forest Service
System lands administered by the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit of the
Forest Service, and a declaration of the
County’s and the City’s liability for
future response costs incurred by the
United States related to the Site. The
County filed a counterclaim for
contribution against the United States as
well as a Third Party Complaint for
contribution against a number of third
party defendants.
Under the proposed Partial Consent
Decree, the County will implement the
Operable Unit One (‘‘OU–1’’) remedy,
which involves consolidating the
landfill waste and encasing it under an
impervious cap and construction of
certain enhanced drainage features
around the cap. The County will also
pay $1,651,000 to resolve the United
States’ claim for Past Response Costs (as
defined in the proposed Partial Consent
Decree) at the Site. In exchange, the
County will receive from the United
States a covenant not to sue or to take
administrative action pursuant to
Sections 106 or 107 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, for the
performance of response actions at OU–
1 and for the United States’ Past
Response Costs and Future Oversight
Costs (as defined in the proposed Partial
Consent Decree).
In addition, the proposed Partial
Consent Decree resolves the County’s
contribution counterclaims against the
United States regarding response costs
incurred, or to be incurred, by the
County at OU–1, referred to in the
proposed Partial Consent Decree as
‘‘Settling Defendant Past Response
Costs’’ and ‘‘Settling Defendant Future
OU–1 Response Costs,’’ in exchange for
a payment of $1,612,349 to the County.
The County, in turn, must deposit that
amount into a special account to fund
implementation of the OU–1 remedy.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Partial Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States of America v. El Dorado County,
California, et al., Civil No. S–01–1520
MCE GGH (E.D. Cal.) (DOJ Ref. No. 90–
11–3–06554) (Partial Consent Decree
with El Dorado County).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Partial Consent Decree may be
examined at U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Office of General Counsel,
33 New Montgomery Street, 17th Floor,
San Francisco, CA 94150 (contact Rose
Miksovsky, (415) 744–3158). During the
public comment period, the Partial
Consent Decree may also be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Partial Consent Decree may also be
obtained by mail from the Consent
Decree Library, U.S. Department of
Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, D.C.
20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a
request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no.
(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a
copy from the Consent Decree Library,
please refer to United States of America
v. El Dorado County, California, et al.,
Civil No. S–01–1520 MCE GGH (E.D.
Cal.) (DOJ Ref. No. 90–11–3–06554)
(Partial Consent Decree with El Dorado
County), and enclose a check in the
amount of $66.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward
a check in that amount to the Consent
Decree Library at the stated address.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–16119 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
38551
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal
Register of the pendency before the
Department of a proposal to grant such
exemption. The notice set forth a
summary of facts and representations
contained in the application for
exemption and referred interested
persons to the application for a
complete statement of the facts and
representations. The application has
been available for public inspection at
the Department in Washington, DC. The
notice also invited interested persons to
submit comments on the requested
exemption to the Department. In
addition the notice stated that any
interested person might submit a
written request that a public hearing be
held (where appropriate). The applicant
has represented that it has complied
with the requirements of the notification
to interested persons. No requests for a
hearing were received by the
Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described
in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption
was issued and the exemption is being
granted solely by the Department
because, effective December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No.
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
transferred the authority of the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue exemptions of
the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Statutory Findings
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
In accordance with section 408(a) of
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and the procedures set forth in 29
CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes
the following findings:
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
and Grant of Individual Exemptions
Involving D–11448, The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc., 2010–19; D–
11514, Citigroup Inc. and its Affiliates
(Citigroup or the Applicant), 2010–20;
D–11527, Barclays California
Corporation (Barcal), 2010–21; D–
11533 and D–11534, Respectively,
CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for
Represented Employees and CUNA
Mutual Pension Plan for NonRepresented Employees (Together, the
Plans), 2010–22
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
This document contains
exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests of the
plan and its participants and beneficiaries;
and
(c) The exemption is protective of the
rights of the participants and beneficiaries of
the plan.
Exemption
Section I—Exemption for In-Kind
Redemption of Assets
The restrictions in sections
406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2) of the Act, and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
38552
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
shall not apply 1 to certain in-kind
redemptions (the Redemption(s)) by The
Employees’ Thrift Plan of Mercantile
Bankshares Corporation and
Participating Affiliates (the Mercantile
Plan) that occurred overnight on
October 31, 2007, of shares (the Shares)
of proprietary mutual funds (the Funds)
for which The PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc. (PNC) or an affiliate thereof
provides investment advisory and other
services, provided that the following
conditions were satisfied:
(A) No sales commissions,
redemption fees, or other similar fees
were paid in connection with the
Redemptions (other than customary
transfer charges paid to parties other
than PNC and any affiliates of PNC
(PNC Affiliates));
(B) The assets transferred to the
Mercantile Plan pursuant to the
Redemptions consisted entirely of cash
and Transferable Securities, as such
term is defined in Section II, below;
(C) In each Redemption, the
Mercantile Plan received its pro rata
portion of the securities with respect to
the Capital Opportunities Fund, and
certain securities, selected pursuant to a
verifiable methodology, that were
approved by an independent fiduciary
(Independent Fiduciary, as such term is
defined in Section II) with respect to the
other four Funds covered by this
exemption, such that the securities
received were equal in value to that of
the number of Shares redeemed, as
determined in a single valuation (using
sources independent of PNC and PNC
Affiliates) performed in the same
manner and as of the close of business
on the same day, in accordance with
Rule 2a–4 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
1940 Act) and the then-existing
procedures adopted by the Board of
Directors of PNC Funds, Inc., which
were in compliance with all applicable
securities laws;
(D) Neither PNC nor any PNC Affiliate
received any direct or indirect
compensation or any fees, including any
fees payable pursuant to Rule 12b–1
under the 1940 Act, in connection with
any Redemption of the Shares;
(E) Prior to a Redemption, the
Independent Fiduciary received a full
written disclosure of information
regarding the Redemption;
(F) Prior to a Redemption, the
Independent Fiduciary communicated
its approval for such Redemption to
PNC;
1 For purposes of this exemption, references to
specific provisions of Title I of the Act, unless
otherwise specified, refer also to the corresponding
provisions of the Code.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
(G) Prior to a Redemption, based on
the disclosures provided to the
Independent Fiduciary, the Independent
Fiduciary determined that the terms of
the Redemption were fair to the
Mercantile Plan, and comparable to and
no less favorable than terms obtainable
at arm’s length between unaffiliated
parties, and that the Redemption was in
the best interests of the Mercantile Plan
and its participants and beneficiaries;
(H) Not later than thirty (30) business
days after the completion of a
Redemption, the Independent Fiduciary
received a written confirmation
regarding such Redemption containing:
(i) The number of Shares held by the
Mercantile Plan immediately before the
Redemption (and the related per Share
net asset value and the total dollar value
of the Shares held) for each Fund;
(ii) The identity (and related aggregate
dollar value) of each security provided
to the Mercantile Plan pursuant to the
Redemption, including each security
valued in accordance with Rule 2a–4
under the 1940 Act and procedures
adopted by the Board of Directors of
PNC Funds, Inc. (using sources
independent of PNC and PNC
Affiliates);
(iii) The current market price of each
security received by the Mercantile Plan
pursuant to the Redemption; and
(iv) If applicable, the identity of each
pricing service or market maker
consulted in determining the value of
such securities;
(I) The value of the securities received
by the Mercantile Plan for each
redeemed Share equaled the net asset
value of such Share at the time of the
transaction, and such value equaled the
value that would have been received by
any other investor for shares of the same
class of the Fund at that time;
(J) Subsequent to the Redemptions,
the Independent Fiduciary performed a
post-transaction review that included,
among other things, a random sampling
of the pricing information it received;
(K) Each of the Mercantile Plan’s
dealings with the Funds, the investment
advisors to the Funds, the principal
underwriter for the Funds, or any
affiliated person thereof, were on a basis
no less favorable to the Mercantile Plan
than dealings between the Funds and
other shareholders holding shares of the
same class as the Shares;
(L) ) Prior to the publication of this
final exemption in the Federal Register
regarding the subject transactions, PNC:
(i) Reimbursed The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings
Plan (the PNC Plan), into which the
Mercantile Plan was merged on
November 1, 2007, for all brokerage
costs incurred by the Mercantile Plan on
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
November 1, 2007 to liquidate the
securities that the Mercantile Plan
received in kind pursuant to a
Redemption; and (ii) provided the
Department with written documentation
indicating reimbursement to the PNC
Plan for such brokerage costs;
(M) PNC maintains, or causes to be
maintained, for a period of six years
from the date of any covered transaction
such records as are necessary to enable
the persons described in paragraph (N)
below to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met, except that (i) a separate prohibited
transaction will not be considered to
have occurred if, due to circumstances
beyond the control of PNC, the records
are lost or destroyed prior to the end of
the six-year period and (ii) no party in
interest with respect to the Mercantile
Plan other than PNC shall be subject to
the civil penalty that may be assessed
under section 502(i) of the Act or to the
taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b)
of the Code if such records are not
maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(N) below;
(N)(1) Except as provided in
subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (N),
and notwithstanding any provisions of
section 504(a)(2) and (b) of the Act, the
records referred to in paragraph (M)
above are unconditionally available at
their customary locations for
examination during normal business
hours by (i) any duly authorized
employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue
Service, or the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), (ii) any fiduciary of
the PNC Plan as the successor to the
Mercantile Plan or any duly authorized
representative of such fiduciary, (iii)
any participant or beneficiary of the
PNC Plan as the successor to the
Mercantile Plan or duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary, and (iv) any employer
whose employees are covered by the
PNC Plan as the successor to the
Mercantile Plan and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by such plan;
(2) None of the persons described in
paragraphs (N)(1)(ii), (iii) and (iv) shall
be authorized to examine trade secrets
of PNC or the Funds, or commercial or
financial information which is
privileged or confidential;
(3) Should PNC or the Funds refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure pursuant to paragraph (N)(2)
above, PNC or the Funds shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide a written
notice advising that person of the
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
reasons for the refusal and that the
Department may request such
information.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Section II—Definitions
For purposes of this exemption—
(A) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means:
(1) Any person (including corporation
or partnership) directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the person;
(2) Any officer, director, employee,
relative, or partner in any such person;
and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of
which such person is an officer,
director, partner, or employee.
(B) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.
(C) The term ‘‘net asset value’’ means
the amount for purposes of pricing all
purchases and sales calculated by
dividing the value of all securities,
determined by a method as set forth in
the Fund’s prospectus and statement of
additional information, and other assets
belonging to the Fund, less the
liabilities charged to each such Fund, by
the number of outstanding shares.
(D) The term ‘‘Independent Fiduciary’’
means a fiduciary who is: (i)
independent of and unrelated to PNC
and its affiliates, and (ii) appointed to
act on behalf of the Mercantile Plan
with respect to the in-kind transfer of
assets from one or more Funds to, or for
the benefit of, the Mercantile Plan. For
purposes of this exemption, a fiduciary
will not be deemed to be independent
of and unrelated to PNC if: (i) Such
fiduciary directly or indirectly controls,
is controlled by, or is under common
control with, PNC; (ii) such fiduciary
directly or indirectly receives any
compensation or other consideration in
connection with any transaction
described in this exemption (except that
an independent fiduciary may receive
compensation from PNC in connection
with the transactions contemplated
herein if the amount or payment of such
compensation is not contingent upon, or
in any way affected by, the independent
fiduciary’s decision); and (iii) an
amount equal to more than one percent
(1%) of such fiduciary’s gross income
(for federal income tax purposes, in its
prior tax year), is paid by PNC and its
affiliates to the fiduciary in 2007, the
year at issue.
(E) The term ‘‘Transferable Securities’’
means securities (1) for which market
quotations are readily available (as
determined under Rule 2a–4 of the 1940
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Act) from persons independent of PNC
and (2) which are not:
(i) Securities that, if publicly offered
or sold, would require registration
under the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) Securities issued by entities in
countries which (a) restrict or prohibit
the holding of securities by nonnationals other than through qualified
investment vehicles, such as the Funds,
or (b) permit transfers of ownership of
securities to be effected only by
transactions conducted on a local stock
exchange;
(iii) Certain portfolio positions (such
as forward foreign currency contracts,
futures and options contracts, swap
transactions, certificates of deposit, and
repurchase agreements) that, although
liquid and marketable, involve the
assumption of contractual obligations,
require special trading facilities, or can
only be traded with the counter-party to
the transaction to effect a change in
beneficial ownership;
(iv) Cash equivalents (such as
certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, and repurchase agreements);
(v) Other assets that are not readily
distributable (including receivables and
prepaid expenses), net of all liabilities
(including accounts payable); and
(vi) Securities subject to ‘‘stop
transfer’’ instructions or similar
contractual restrictions on transfer.
(F) The term ‘‘relative’’ means a
‘‘relative’’ as that term is defined in
section 3(15) of the Act (or a ‘‘member
of the family’’ as that term is defined in
section 4975(e)(6) of the Code), or a
brother, sister, or a spouse of a brother
or a sister.
Effective Date: The exemption is
effective as of October 31, 2007.2
2 As a general matter, it is the Department’s view
that the model practice to effect an in-kind
redemption by a mutual fund to a shareholderpension plan, subject to Title I of ERISA, is through
a pro rata distribution because the adoption of such
a method ensures that the individual stocks
selected for the in-kind redemption are objectively
determined. The Department recognizes that the inkind redemption for which exemptive relief is
provided involves unique circumstances because,
among other things, it facilitated the transfer of plan
assets and the merger of The Employees’ Thrift Plan
of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation and
Participating Affiliates (the Mercantile Plan) with
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive
Savings Plan (the PNC Plan). See also Facts and
Representations #12 contained in the notice of
proposed exemption, which summarizes the basis
for satisfying the section 408(a) statutory criteria for
providing exemptive relief. In this regard, an
important condition of this exemption is that PNC
paid all brokerage commissions associated with the
Mercantile Plan’s sale of the securities received in
the Redemptions. See Section I(L) of the exemption.
Further, the Department encourages applicants,
their advisers and counsel to confer, in advance,
with EBSA’s Office of Exemption Determinations as
to whether a contemplated non-pro rata in-kind
redemption involving plan assets may qualify for
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38553
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
January 19, 2010 at 75 FR 3060.
Written Comments
No substantive comments were
received by the Department with respect
to the notice of proposed exemption.
For Further Information Contact: Ms.
Karin Weng of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8557. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Exemption
Section I. Sales of Auction Rate
Securities From Plans to Citigroup:
Unrelated to a Settlement Agreement
The restrictions of section
406(a)(1)(A) and (D) and section
406(b)(1) and (2) of the Act and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of
the Code, shall not apply, effective
February 1, 2008, to the sale by a Plan
(as defined in Section V(e)) of an
Auction Rate Security (as defined in
Section V(c)) to Citigroup, where such
sale (an Unrelated Sale) is unrelated to,
and not made in connection with, a
Settlement Agreement (as defined in
Section V(f)), provided that the
conditions set forth in Section II have
been met.3
Section II. Conditions Applicable to
Transactions Described in Section I
(a) The Plan acquired the Auction
Rate Security in connection with
brokerage or advisory services provided
by Citigroup to the Plan;
(b) The last auction for the Auction
Rate Security was unsuccessful;
(c) Except in the case of a Plan
sponsored by Citigroup for its own
employees (a Citigroup Plan), the
Unrelated Sale is made pursuant to a
written offer by Citigroup (the Offer)
containing all of the material terms of
the Unrelated Sale. Either the Offer or
other materials available to the Plan
provide: (1) The identity and par value
of the Auction Rate Security; (2) the
interest or dividend amounts that are
due and unpaid with respect to the
Auction Rate Security; and (3) the most
recent rate information for the Auction
prohibited transaction exemptive relief. Although
the applicant requested both retroactive and
prospective exemptive relief, the Department is
granting only retroactive exemptive relief relating to
the October 31, 2007 Redemptions.
3 For purposes of this exemption, references to
section 406 of the Act should be read to refer as
well to the corresponding provisions of section
4975 of the Code.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
38554
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Rate Security (if reliable information is
available). Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in the case of a pooled fund
maintained or advised by Citigroup, this
condition shall be deemed met to the
extent each Plan invested in the pooled
fund (other than a Citigroup Plan)
receives advance written notice
regarding the Unrelated Sale, where
such notice contains all of the material
terms of the Unrelated Sale;
(d) The Unrelated Sale is for no
consideration other than cash payment
against prompt delivery of the Auction
Rate Security;
(e) The sales price for the Auction
Rate Security is equal to the par value
of the Auction Rate Security, plus any
accrued but unpaid interest or
dividends;
(f) The Plan does not waive any rights
or claims in connection with the
Unrelated Sale;
(g) The decision to accept the Offer or
retain the Auction Rate Security is made
by a Plan fiduciary or Plan participant
or IRA owner who is independent (as
defined in Section V(d)) of Citigroup.
Notwithstanding the foregoing: (1) In
the case of an IRA (as defined in Section
V(e)) which is beneficially owned by an
employee, officer, director or partner of
Citigroup, the decision to accept the
Offer or retain the Auction Rate Security
may be made by such employee, officer,
director or partner; or (2) in the case of
a Citigroup Plan or a pooled fund
maintained or advised by Citigroup, the
decision to accept the Offer may be
made by Citigroup after Citigroup has
determined that such purchase is in the
best interest of the Citigroup Plan or
pooled fund; 4
(h) Except in the case of a Citigroup
Plan or a pooled fund maintained or
advised by Citigroup, neither Citigroup
nor any affiliate exercises investment
discretion or renders investment advice
within the meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3–
21(c) with respect to the decision to
accept the Offer or retain the Auction
Rate Security;
4 The Department notes that the Act’s general
standards of fiduciary conduct also would apply to
the transactions described herein. In this regard,
section 404 of the Act requires, among other things,
that a fiduciary discharge his duties respecting a
plan solely in the interest of the plan’s participants
and beneficiaries and in a prudent manner.
Accordingly, a plan fiduciary must act prudently
with respect to, among other things, the decision to
sell the Auction Rate Security to Citigroup for the
par value of the Auction Rate Security, plus unpaid
interest and dividends. The Department further
emphasizes that it expects plan fiduciaries, prior to
entering into any of the proposed transactions, to
fully understand the risks associated with this type
of transaction following disclosure by Citigroup of
all relevant information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
(i) The Plan does not pay any
commissions or transaction costs with
respect to the Unrelated Sale;
(j) The Unrelated Sale is not part of an
arrangement, agreement or
understanding designed to benefit a
party in interest to the Plan;
(k) Citigroup and its affiliates, as
applicable, maintain, or cause to be
maintained, for a period of six (6) years
from the date of the Unrelated Sale,
such records as are necessary to enable
the persons described below in
paragraph (l)(1), to determine whether
the conditions of this exemption, if
granted, have been met, except that:
(1) No party in interest with respect
to a Plan which engages in an Unrelated
Sale, other than Citigroup and its
affiliates, as applicable, shall be subject
to a civil penalty under section 502(i) of
the Act or the taxes imposed by section
4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if such
records are not maintained, or not
available for examination, as required,
below, by paragraph (l)(1); and
(2) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because, due to circumstances
beyond the control of Citigroup or its
affiliates, as applicable, such records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the
six-year period;
(l)(1) Except as provided below in
paragraph (l)(2), and notwithstanding
any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records
referred to above in paragraph (k) are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
Internal Revenue Service, or the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission;
(B) Any fiduciary of any Plan,
including any IRA owner, that engages
in an Unrelated Sale, or any duly
authorized employee or representative
of such fiduciary; and
(C) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a Plan that engages in the
Unrelated Sale, or any authorized
employee or representative of these
entities;
(2) None of the persons described
above in paragraphs (l)(1)(B)–(C) shall
be authorized to examine trade secrets
of Citigroup, or commercial or financial
information which is privileged or
confidential; and
(3) Should Citigroup refuse to disclose
information on the basis that such
information is exempt from disclosure,
Citigroup shall, by the close of the
thirtieth (30th) day following the
request, provide a written notice
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
advising that person of the reasons for
the refusal and that the Department may
request such information.
Section III. Sales of Auction Rate
Securities From Plans to Citigroup:
Related to a Settlement Agreement
The restrictions of section
406(a)(1)(A) and (D) and section
406(b)(1) and (2) of the Act and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of
the Code, shall not apply, effective
February 1, 2008, to the sale by a Plan
of an Auction Rate Security to
Citigroup, where such sale (a Settlement
Sale) is related to, and made in
connection with, a Settlement
Agreement, provided that the conditions
set forth in Section IV have been met.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to
Transactions Described in Section III
(a) The terms and delivery of the Offer
are consistent with the requirements set
forth in the Settlement Agreement and
acceptance of the Offer does not
constitute a waiver of any claim of the
tendering Plan;
(b) The Offer or other documents
available to the Plan specifically
describe, among other things:
(1) How a Plan may determine: the
Auction Rate Securities held by the Plan
with Citigroup; the number of shares or
par value of the Auction Rate Securities;
the interest or dividend amounts that
are due and unpaid with respect to the
Auction Rate Securities; and (if reliable
information is available) the most recent
rate information for the Auction Rate
Securities;
(2) The background of the Offer;
(3) That neither the tender of Auction
Rate Securities nor the purchase of any
Auction Rate Securities pursuant to the
Offer will constitute a waiver of any
claim of the tendering Plan;
(4) The methods and timing by which
Plans may accept the Offer;
(5) The purchase dates, or the manner
of determining the purchase dates, for
Auction Rate Securities tendered
pursuant to the Offer;
(6) The timing for acceptance by
Citigroup of tendered Auction Rate
Securities;
(7) The timing of payment for Auction
Rate Securities accepted by Citigroup
for payment;
(8) The methods and timing by which
a Plan may elect to withdraw tendered
Auction Rate Securities from the Offer;
(9) The expiration date of the Offer;
(10) The fact that Citigroup may make
purchases of Auction Rate Securities
outside of the Offer and may otherwise
buy, sell, hold or seek to restructure,
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
redeem or otherwise dispose of the
Auction Rate Securities;
(11) A description of the risk factors
relating to the Offer as Citigroup deems
appropriate;
(12) How to obtain additional
information concerning the Offer; and
(13) The manner in which
information concerning material
amendments or changes to the Offer will
be communicated to the Plan;
(c) The terms of the Settlement Sale
are consistent with the requirements set
forth in the Settlement Agreement; and
(d) All of the conditions in Section II
have been met.
Section V. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption:
(a) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ means any
person directly or indirectly, through
one or more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with such other person;
(b) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual;
(c) The term ‘‘Auction Rate Security’’
or ‘‘ARS’’ means a security: (1) That is
either a debt instrument (generally with
a long-term nominal maturity) or
preferred stock; and (2) with an interest
rate or dividend that is reset at specific
intervals through a Dutch auction
process;
(d) A person is ‘‘independent’’ of
Citigroup if the person is: (1) not
Citigroup or an affiliate; and (2) not a
relative (as defined in section 3(15) of
the Act) of the party engaging in the
transaction;
(e) The term ‘‘Plan’’ means an
individual retirement account or similar
account described in section
4975(e)(1)(B) through (F) of the Code (an
IRA); an employee benefit plan as
defined in section 3(3) of the Act; or an
entity holding plan assets within the
meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3–101, as
modified by section 3(42) of the Act;
and
(f) The term ‘‘Settlement Agreement’’
means a legal settlement involving
Citigroup and a U.S. state or federal
authority that provides for the purchase
of an ARS by Citigroup from a Plan.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective as of February 1, 2008.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
February 23, 2010 at 75 FR 8128.
For Further Information Contact:
Brian Shiker of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8552. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a),
406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act, section
8477(c)(2) of the Federal Employees’
Retirement System Act of 1986, as
amended (FERSA), and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,
shall not apply, effective September 4,
2008, to the cash sales (the Sales) by the
Barclays Global Investors ‘‘Money
Market Fund’’ and ‘‘Cash Equivalent
Fund II,’’ which are short-term collective
investment funds (STIFs) managed or
maintained by Barclays Global
Investors, N.A. (BGI, or together with
Barcal and any of their affiliates,
collectively, ‘‘the Applicant’’), of certain
short-term debt instruments (the Notes)
to Barcal, provided that the following
conditions are met:
(a) The Sales were one-time
transactions for cash payment made on
a delivery versus payment (i.e., same
day) basis in the amount described in
paragraph (b);
(b) The STIFs received an amount
equal to the greater of:
(1) The amortized cost (including
accrued and unpaid interest) of the
Notes, determined as of the dates of the
Sales, or
(2) the fair market value (including
accrued and unpaid interest) of the
Notes, determined by an independent
third party source;
(c) The STIFs did not bear any
commissions, transaction costs or other
expenses in connection with the Sales;
(d) The terms and conditions of the
Sales were at least as favorable to the
STIFs as those available in an arm’slength transaction with an unrelated
party.
(e) BGI, as fiduciary of the STIFs,
determined that the Sales were in the
best interest of the STIFs and any
employee benefit plans (the Plans)
invested in the STIFs as of the dates of
the Sales.
(f) BGI took all appropriate actions
necessary to safeguard the interests of
the STIFs and any Plans invested in the
STIFs in connection with the Sales.
(g) If the exercise of any of Barcal’s
rights, claims, or causes of action in
connection with its ownership of the
Notes results in Barcal recovering from
the issuer of the Notes, or from any third
party, an aggregate amount that is more
than the sum of:
(1) The purchase price paid for such
Notes by Barcal; and
(2) the interest due on the notes from
and after the date Barcal purchased the
Notes from the STIFs, Barcal will refund
such excess amount promptly to the
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38555
STIFs (after deducting all reasonable
expenses incurred in connection with
the recovery);
(h) BGI maintains, or causes to be
maintained, for a period of six (6) years
from the date of any covered transaction
such records as are necessary to enable
the persons described below in
paragraph (i)(1), to determine whether
the conditions of this exemption have
been met, except that—
(1) No party in interest with respect
to a Plan which engages in the covered
transactions, other than BGI and its
affiliates, shall be subject to a civil
penalty under section 502(i) of the Act
or the taxes imposed by section 4975(a)
and (b) of the Code, if such records are
not maintained, or not available for
examination, as required, below, by
paragraph (i)(1);
(2) A separate prohibited transaction
shall not be considered to have occurred
solely because due to circumstances
beyond the control of BGI, such records
are lost or destroyed prior to the end of
the six-year period. (i)(1) Except as
provided, below, in paragraph (i)(2), and
notwithstanding any provisions of
subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504
of the Act, the records referred to,
above, in paragraph (h) are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by—
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or of
the Internal Revenue Service; or
(B) Any fiduciary of any Plan that
engages in the covered transactions, or
any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; or
(C) Any employer of participants and
beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are
covered by a Plan that engages in the
covered transactions, or any authorized
employee or representative of these
entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
a Plan that engages in a covered
transaction, or duly authorized
employee or representative of such
participant or beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described,
above, in paragraph (i)(1)(B)–(D) shall be
authorized to examine trade secrets of
BGI, or commercial or financial
information which is privileged or
confidential; and
(3) Should BGI refuse to disclose
information on the basis that such
information is exempt from disclosure,
BGI shall, by the close of the thirtieth
(30th) day following the request,
provide a written notice advising that
person of the reasons for the refusal and
that the Department may request such
information.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
38556
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption (the Notice)
published on March 15, 2010 at 75 FR
12308.
Effective Date: This exemption is
effective September 4, 2008.
Written Comments
The only written comment received
by the Department was submitted by the
Applicant. The Applicant requested
changes with respect to condition (i) of
the Notice concerning the entities to
whom the records maintained pursuant
to condition (h) of the Notice are
required to be made available by BGI.
First, the Applicant requested that the
records need not be made
unconditionally available to duly
authorized employees or representatives
of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) because, unlike
the cases involving Auction Rate
Securities, the subject Sales were not
required by an SEC settlement; nor are
the STIFs within the jurisdiction of the
SEC. The Department accepts these
representations by the Applicant and
has amended the grant accordingly.
Second, the Applicant requested that
the records need not be made
unconditionally available to any
participant or beneficiary of a Plan that
engages in a covered transaction, or
duly authorized employee or
representative of such participant or
beneficiary. The Applicant noted that
there are nearly 1,000 Plans whose
fiduciaries will have access to these
records. There are millions of
participants in these Plans, none of
whom have a relationship with the
Applicant. In order to protect the
confidentiality of Plan arrangements,
every time a Plan participant sought to
review these records, the Applicant
would be required to contact a Plan
fiduciary to verify that the participant
was in fact a participant in the Plan on
the date of the transaction and is still a
participant in the Plan. This would
cause the Applicant to spend countless
hours just so that a participant or his or
her representative could review material
that the Plan fiduciary already had in its
possession. The Applicant stated that
this would impose a considerable and
unwarranted burden. However, because
participants and beneficiaries of the
Plans are affected by the subject Sales
and have an interest in the fiduciary
management of their Plan assets, it is
the Department’s view that they also
should have access to the records
maintained by BGI, which are otherwise
required to be maintained and made
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
available pursuant to the grant of
exemptive relief. Accordingly, the
Department has not made this requested
change to the condition contained in
section (i) of the Notice.
The Department has given full
consideration to the entire record,
including the comment letter received.
The Department has determined to grant
the exemption, with the one change as
noted above.
For Further Information Contact: Gary
H. Lefkowitz of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8546. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Exemption
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(A), 406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D),
406(b)(1), and (b)(2) of the Act, and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of
the Code, shall not apply to: (i) the
February 20, 2009 cash sale (the Sale),
at aggregate cost basis plus interest, by
each of the Plans of interests in certain
private equity funds (the Funds) to the
CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (the
Applicant), the sponsor of the Plans and
a party in interest with respect to the
Plans, pursuant to a contract between
the Applicant and the trustee of the
Plans concluded on that same date; (ii)
the September 14, 2009 payment by the
Applicant of certain additional cash
amounts, including interest (the Top-Up
Payments); to the Plans pursuant to the
terms of the foregoing contract; and (iii)
the extension of credit between the
Plans and the Applicant from the date
of the Sale (February 20, 2009) to the
date of the Top-Up Payments
(September 14, 2009), provided that the
following conditions were satisfied:
(a) An independent fiduciary
reviewed the terms and conditions of
the Sale and of the Top-Up Payments
prior to their execution, and determined
that both were protective of the interests
of the Plans;
(b) The independent fiduciary
determined that the terms and
conditions of both the Sale and of the
Top-Up Payments were at least as
favorable to the Plans as those that
would have been obtained in an arm’s
length transaction between unrelated
parties;
(c) The terms and conditions of both
the Sale and of the Top-Up Payments
were at least as favorable to the Plans as
those that would have been obtained in
an arm’s length transaction between
unrelated parties; and
(d) The independent fiduciary
provided its opinion in written reports
on behalf of the Plans as to the fairness
and reasonableness of the Sale of the
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Plans’ interests in the Funds to the
Applicant, and determined that the
terms of the original Sale and
subsequent Top-Up Payments were
especially beneficial to each of the Plans
because: (i) On February 20, 2009, the
Plans received a return of their aggregate
cost basis of their interests in the Funds
(which cost basis was determined by the
independent fiduciary to exceed the
aggregate fair market value of the Plans’
interests in the Funds as of October 31,
2008), plus interest accrued on the
Funds from their date of acquisition by
each Plan through the date of the Sale;
and (ii) On September 14, 2009, the
independent fiduciary determined that,
in instances where the fair market value
of any Fund on December 31, 2008
exceeded its original cost basis, each of
the Plans received a Top-Up Payment
on September 14, 2009 comprised of the
increased value of such Fund, plus
interest accrued on such increased value
from December 31, 2008 to the date of
the Top-Up Payments (September 14,
2009).
Written Comments
The Notice of Proposed Exemption
(The Notice), Published in the Federal
Register on April 2, 2010 beginning on
page 16849, invited all interested
persons to submit written comments
and requests for a hearing to the
Department within forty-five (45) days
of the date of its publication. At the
close of the comment period, the
Department received a single written
comment from two current beneficiaries
of the CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for
Non-Represented Employees. While
expressing concern about the Plan’s
initial decision to invest in the Funds,
the comment letter was supportive of
the proposed exemption for the sale of
the Plan’s interests in the Funds as
described in the Notice. The Department
did not receive any other written
comments from interested persons with
respect to the Notice during the
aforementioned 45-day comment
period, nor did it receive any requests
for a hearing.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the text of the Notice
at 75 FR 16849.
For Further Information Contact: Mr.
Mark Judge of the Department at (202)
693–8550. (This is not a toll-free
number).
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which among other things
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to
and not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transactional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption
is subject to the express condition that
the material facts and representations
contained in the application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
June, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–16097 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Application Nos. and Proposed
Exemptions; D–11489, Morgan Stanley
& Co., Incorporated; L–11609, The
Finishing Trades Institute of the MidAtlantic Region (the Plan) et al.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION:
Notice of proposed exemptions.
SUMMARY: This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemptions,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
The name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5700, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No.___, stated in
each Notice of Proposed Exemption.
Interested persons are also invited to
submit comments and/or hearing
requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX.
Any such comments or requests should
be sent either by e-mail to:
‘‘moffitt.betty@dol.gov’’, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38557
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain
representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the applications on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) and section
4975(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1974 (the Code), and in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR
part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990).
Section I. Transactions Involving Plans
Described in Both Title I and Title II of
ERISA
If the proposed exemption is granted,
the restrictions of section 406(a)(1)(A)
through (D) and section 406(b) of
ERISA, and the sanctions resulting from
the application of sections 4975(a) and
(b) of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1) of the Code, shall not apply,
effective February 1, 2008, to the
following transactions, if the conditions
set forth in Section III have been met: 1
(a) The sale or exchange of an
‘‘Auction Rate Security’’ (as defined in
Section IV (b)) by a ‘‘Plan’’ (as defined
in Section IV(h)) to the ‘‘Sponsor’’ (as
defined in Section IV (g)) of such Plan;
or
1 For purposes of this proposed exemption,
references to section 406 of ERISA should be read
to refer also to the corresponding provisions of
section 4975 of the Code.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 127 (Friday, July 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38551-38557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16097]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual
Exemptions Involving D-11448, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.,
2010-19; D-11514, Citigroup Inc. and its Affiliates (Citigroup or the
Applicant), 2010-20; D-11527, Barclays California Corporation (Barcal),
2010-21; D-11533 and D-11534, Respectively, CUNA Mutual Pension Plan
for Represented Employees and CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for Non-
Represented Employees (Together, the Plans), 2010-22
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal Register of the pendency
before the Department of a proposal to grant such exemption. The notice
set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in the
application for exemption and referred interested persons to the
application for a complete statement of the facts and representations.
The application has been available for public inspection at the
Department in Washington, DC. The notice also invited interested
persons to submit comments on the requested exemption to the
Department. In addition the notice stated that any interested person
might submit a written request that a public hearing be held (where
appropriate). The applicant has represented that it has complied with
the requirements of the notification to interested persons. No requests
for a hearing were received by the Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption was issued and the exemption is
being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 31,
1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1
(1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests of the plan and its
participants and beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the rights of the
participants and beneficiaries of the plan.
Exemption
Section I--Exemption for In-Kind Redemption of Assets
The restrictions in sections 406(a)(1)(A) through (D) and 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2) of the Act, and the sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through
(E) of the Code,
[[Page 38552]]
shall not apply \1\ to certain in-kind redemptions (the Redemption(s))
by The Employees' Thrift Plan of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation and
Participating Affiliates (the Mercantile Plan) that occurred overnight
on October 31, 2007, of shares (the Shares) of proprietary mutual funds
(the Funds) for which The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) or
an affiliate thereof provides investment advisory and other services,
provided that the following conditions were satisfied:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this exemption, references to specific
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) No sales commissions, redemption fees, or other similar fees
were paid in connection with the Redemptions (other than customary
transfer charges paid to parties other than PNC and any affiliates of
PNC (PNC Affiliates));
(B) The assets transferred to the Mercantile Plan pursuant to the
Redemptions consisted entirely of cash and Transferable Securities, as
such term is defined in Section II, below;
(C) In each Redemption, the Mercantile Plan received its pro rata
portion of the securities with respect to the Capital Opportunities
Fund, and certain securities, selected pursuant to a verifiable
methodology, that were approved by an independent fiduciary
(Independent Fiduciary, as such term is defined in Section II) with
respect to the other four Funds covered by this exemption, such that
the securities received were equal in value to that of the number of
Shares redeemed, as determined in a single valuation (using sources
independent of PNC and PNC Affiliates) performed in the same manner and
as of the close of business on the same day, in accordance with Rule
2a-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940
Act) and the then-existing procedures adopted by the Board of Directors
of PNC Funds, Inc., which were in compliance with all applicable
securities laws;
(D) Neither PNC nor any PNC Affiliate received any direct or
indirect compensation or any fees, including any fees payable pursuant
to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, in connection with any Redemption of
the Shares;
(E) Prior to a Redemption, the Independent Fiduciary received a
full written disclosure of information regarding the Redemption;
(F) Prior to a Redemption, the Independent Fiduciary communicated
its approval for such Redemption to PNC;
(G) Prior to a Redemption, based on the disclosures provided to the
Independent Fiduciary, the Independent Fiduciary determined that the
terms of the Redemption were fair to the Mercantile Plan, and
comparable to and no less favorable than terms obtainable at arm's
length between unaffiliated parties, and that the Redemption was in the
best interests of the Mercantile Plan and its participants and
beneficiaries;
(H) Not later than thirty (30) business days after the completion
of a Redemption, the Independent Fiduciary received a written
confirmation regarding such Redemption containing:
(i) The number of Shares held by the Mercantile Plan immediately
before the Redemption (and the related per Share net asset value and
the total dollar value of the Shares held) for each Fund;
(ii) The identity (and related aggregate dollar value) of each
security provided to the Mercantile Plan pursuant to the Redemption,
including each security valued in accordance with Rule 2a-4 under the
1940 Act and procedures adopted by the Board of Directors of PNC Funds,
Inc. (using sources independent of PNC and PNC Affiliates);
(iii) The current market price of each security received by the
Mercantile Plan pursuant to the Redemption; and
(iv) If applicable, the identity of each pricing service or market
maker consulted in determining the value of such securities;
(I) The value of the securities received by the Mercantile Plan for
each redeemed Share equaled the net asset value of such Share at the
time of the transaction, and such value equaled the value that would
have been received by any other investor for shares of the same class
of the Fund at that time;
(J) Subsequent to the Redemptions, the Independent Fiduciary
performed a post-transaction review that included, among other things,
a random sampling of the pricing information it received;
(K) Each of the Mercantile Plan's dealings with the Funds, the
investment advisors to the Funds, the principal underwriter for the
Funds, or any affiliated person thereof, were on a basis no less
favorable to the Mercantile Plan than dealings between the Funds and
other shareholders holding shares of the same class as the Shares;
(L) ) Prior to the publication of this final exemption in the
Federal Register regarding the subject transactions, PNC: (i)
Reimbursed The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. Incentive Savings
Plan (the PNC Plan), into which the Mercantile Plan was merged on
November 1, 2007, for all brokerage costs incurred by the Mercantile
Plan on November 1, 2007 to liquidate the securities that the
Mercantile Plan received in kind pursuant to a Redemption; and (ii)
provided the Department with written documentation indicating
reimbursement to the PNC Plan for such brokerage costs;
(M) PNC maintains, or causes to be maintained, for a period of six
years from the date of any covered transaction such records as are
necessary to enable the persons described in paragraph (N) below to
determine whether the conditions of this exemption have been met,
except that (i) a separate prohibited transaction will not be
considered to have occurred if, due to circumstances beyond the control
of PNC, the records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the six-
year period and (ii) no party in interest with respect to the
Mercantile Plan other than PNC shall be subject to the civil penalty
that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code if such records are not
maintained or are not available for examination as required by
paragraph (N) below;
(N)(1) Except as provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph
(N), and notwithstanding any provisions of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of
the Act, the records referred to in paragraph (M) above are
unconditionally available at their customary locations for examination
during normal business hours by (i) any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the Internal Revenue Service, or the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), (ii) any fiduciary of the PNC
Plan as the successor to the Mercantile Plan or any duly authorized
representative of such fiduciary, (iii) any participant or beneficiary
of the PNC Plan as the successor to the Mercantile Plan or duly
authorized representative of such participant or beneficiary, and (iv)
any employer whose employees are covered by the PNC Plan as the
successor to the Mercantile Plan and any employee organization whose
members are covered by such plan;
(2) None of the persons described in paragraphs (N)(1)(ii), (iii)
and (iv) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of PNC or the
Funds, or commercial or financial information which is privileged or
confidential;
(3) Should PNC or the Funds refuse to disclose information on the
basis that such information is exempt from disclosure pursuant to
paragraph (N)(2) above, PNC or the Funds shall, by the close of the
thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide a written notice
advising that person of the
[[Page 38553]]
reasons for the refusal and that the Department may request such
information.
Section II--Definitions
For purposes of this exemption--
(A) The term ``affiliate'' means:
(1) Any person (including corporation or partnership) directly or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with the person;
(2) Any officer, director, employee, relative, or partner in any
such person; and
(3) Any corporation or partnership of which such person is an
officer, director, partner, or employee.
(B) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
(C) The term ``net asset value'' means the amount for purposes of
pricing all purchases and sales calculated by dividing the value of all
securities, determined by a method as set forth in the Fund's
prospectus and statement of additional information, and other assets
belonging to the Fund, less the liabilities charged to each such Fund,
by the number of outstanding shares.
(D) The term ``Independent Fiduciary'' means a fiduciary who is:
(i) independent of and unrelated to PNC and its affiliates, and (ii)
appointed to act on behalf of the Mercantile Plan with respect to the
in-kind transfer of assets from one or more Funds to, or for the
benefit of, the Mercantile Plan. For purposes of this exemption, a
fiduciary will not be deemed to be independent of and unrelated to PNC
if: (i) Such fiduciary directly or indirectly controls, is controlled
by, or is under common control with, PNC; (ii) such fiduciary directly
or indirectly receives any compensation or other consideration in
connection with any transaction described in this exemption (except
that an independent fiduciary may receive compensation from PNC in
connection with the transactions contemplated herein if the amount or
payment of such compensation is not contingent upon, or in any way
affected by, the independent fiduciary's decision); and (iii) an amount
equal to more than one percent (1%) of such fiduciary's gross income
(for federal income tax purposes, in its prior tax year), is paid by
PNC and its affiliates to the fiduciary in 2007, the year at issue.
(E) The term ``Transferable Securities'' means securities (1) for
which market quotations are readily available (as determined under Rule
2a-4 of the 1940 Act) from persons independent of PNC and (2) which are
not:
(i) Securities that, if publicly offered or sold, would require
registration under the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) Securities issued by entities in countries which (a) restrict
or prohibit the holding of securities by non-nationals other than
through qualified investment vehicles, such as the Funds, or (b) permit
transfers of ownership of securities to be effected only by
transactions conducted on a local stock exchange;
(iii) Certain portfolio positions (such as forward foreign currency
contracts, futures and options contracts, swap transactions,
certificates of deposit, and repurchase agreements) that, although
liquid and marketable, involve the assumption of contractual
obligations, require special trading facilities, or can only be traded
with the counter-party to the transaction to effect a change in
beneficial ownership;
(iv) Cash equivalents (such as certificates of deposit, commercial
paper, and repurchase agreements);
(v) Other assets that are not readily distributable (including
receivables and prepaid expenses), net of all liabilities (including
accounts payable); and
(vi) Securities subject to ``stop transfer'' instructions or
similar contractual restrictions on transfer.
(F) The term ``relative'' means a ``relative'' as that term is
defined in section 3(15) of the Act (or a ``member of the family'' as
that term is defined in section 4975(e)(6) of the Code), or a brother,
sister, or a spouse of a brother or a sister.
Effective Date: The exemption is effective as of October 31,
2007.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As a general matter, it is the Department's view that the
model practice to effect an in-kind redemption by a mutual fund to a
shareholder-pension plan, subject to Title I of ERISA, is through a
pro rata distribution because the adoption of such a method ensures
that the individual stocks selected for the in-kind redemption are
objectively determined. The Department recognizes that the in-kind
redemption for which exemptive relief is provided involves unique
circumstances because, among other things, it facilitated the
transfer of plan assets and the merger of The Employees' Thrift Plan
of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation and Participating Affiliates
(the Mercantile Plan) with The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Incentive Savings Plan (the PNC Plan). See also Facts and
Representations 12 contained in the notice of proposed
exemption, which summarizes the basis for satisfying the section
408(a) statutory criteria for providing exemptive relief. In this
regard, an important condition of this exemption is that PNC paid
all brokerage commissions associated with the Mercantile Plan's sale
of the securities received in the Redemptions. See Section I(L) of
the exemption. Further, the Department encourages applicants, their
advisers and counsel to confer, in advance, with EBSA's Office of
Exemption Determinations as to whether a contemplated non-pro rata
in-kind redemption involving plan assets may qualify for prohibited
transaction exemptive relief. Although the applicant requested both
retroactive and prospective exemptive relief, the Department is
granting only retroactive exemptive relief relating to the October
31, 2007 Redemptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on January 19, 2010 at 75 FR
3060.
Written Comments
No substantive comments were received by the Department with
respect to the notice of proposed exemption.
For Further Information Contact: Ms. Karin Weng of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8557. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Exemption
Section I. Sales of Auction Rate Securities From Plans to Citigroup:
Unrelated to a Settlement Agreement
The restrictions of section 406(a)(1)(A) and (D) and section
406(b)(1) and (2) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code, shall not apply, effective
February 1, 2008, to the sale by a Plan (as defined in Section V(e)) of
an Auction Rate Security (as defined in Section V(c)) to Citigroup,
where such sale (an Unrelated Sale) is unrelated to, and not made in
connection with, a Settlement Agreement (as defined in Section V(f)),
provided that the conditions set forth in Section II have been met.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For purposes of this exemption, references to section 406 of
the Act should be read to refer as well to the corresponding
provisions of section 4975 of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section II. Conditions Applicable to Transactions Described in Section
I
(a) The Plan acquired the Auction Rate Security in connection with
brokerage or advisory services provided by Citigroup to the Plan;
(b) The last auction for the Auction Rate Security was
unsuccessful;
(c) Except in the case of a Plan sponsored by Citigroup for its own
employees (a Citigroup Plan), the Unrelated Sale is made pursuant to a
written offer by Citigroup (the Offer) containing all of the material
terms of the Unrelated Sale. Either the Offer or other materials
available to the Plan provide: (1) The identity and par value of the
Auction Rate Security; (2) the interest or dividend amounts that are
due and unpaid with respect to the Auction Rate Security; and (3) the
most recent rate information for the Auction
[[Page 38554]]
Rate Security (if reliable information is available). Notwithstanding
the foregoing, in the case of a pooled fund maintained or advised by
Citigroup, this condition shall be deemed met to the extent each Plan
invested in the pooled fund (other than a Citigroup Plan) receives
advance written notice regarding the Unrelated Sale, where such notice
contains all of the material terms of the Unrelated Sale;
(d) The Unrelated Sale is for no consideration other than cash
payment against prompt delivery of the Auction Rate Security;
(e) The sales price for the Auction Rate Security is equal to the
par value of the Auction Rate Security, plus any accrued but unpaid
interest or dividends;
(f) The Plan does not waive any rights or claims in connection with
the Unrelated Sale;
(g) The decision to accept the Offer or retain the Auction Rate
Security is made by a Plan fiduciary or Plan participant or IRA owner
who is independent (as defined in Section V(d)) of Citigroup.
Notwithstanding the foregoing: (1) In the case of an IRA (as defined in
Section V(e)) which is beneficially owned by an employee, officer,
director or partner of Citigroup, the decision to accept the Offer or
retain the Auction Rate Security may be made by such employee, officer,
director or partner; or (2) in the case of a Citigroup Plan or a pooled
fund maintained or advised by Citigroup, the decision to accept the
Offer may be made by Citigroup after Citigroup has determined that such
purchase is in the best interest of the Citigroup Plan or pooled fund;
\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Department notes that the Act's general standards of
fiduciary conduct also would apply to the transactions described
herein. In this regard, section 404 of the Act requires, among other
things, that a fiduciary discharge his duties respecting a plan
solely in the interest of the plan's participants and beneficiaries
and in a prudent manner. Accordingly, a plan fiduciary must act
prudently with respect to, among other things, the decision to sell
the Auction Rate Security to Citigroup for the par value of the
Auction Rate Security, plus unpaid interest and dividends. The
Department further emphasizes that it expects plan fiduciaries,
prior to entering into any of the proposed transactions, to fully
understand the risks associated with this type of transaction
following disclosure by Citigroup of all relevant information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) Except in the case of a Citigroup Plan or a pooled fund
maintained or advised by Citigroup, neither Citigroup nor any affiliate
exercises investment discretion or renders investment advice within the
meaning of 29 CFR 2510.3-21(c) with respect to the decision to accept
the Offer or retain the Auction Rate Security;
(i) The Plan does not pay any commissions or transaction costs with
respect to the Unrelated Sale;
(j) The Unrelated Sale is not part of an arrangement, agreement or
understanding designed to benefit a party in interest to the Plan;
(k) Citigroup and its affiliates, as applicable, maintain, or cause
to be maintained, for a period of six (6) years from the date of the
Unrelated Sale, such records as are necessary to enable the persons
described below in paragraph (l)(1), to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption, if granted, have been met, except that:
(1) No party in interest with respect to a Plan which engages in an
Unrelated Sale, other than Citigroup and its affiliates, as applicable,
shall be subject to a civil penalty under section 502(i) of the Act or
the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if such
records are not maintained, or not available for examination, as
required, below, by paragraph (l)(1); and
(2) A separate prohibited transaction shall not be considered to
have occurred solely because, due to circumstances beyond the control
of Citigroup or its affiliates, as applicable, such records are lost or
destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period;
(l)(1) Except as provided below in paragraph (l)(2), and
notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to above in paragraph (k) are
unconditionally available at their customary location for examination
during normal business hours by:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue Service, or the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission;
(B) Any fiduciary of any Plan, including any IRA owner, that
engages in an Unrelated Sale, or any duly authorized employee or
representative of such fiduciary; and
(C) Any employer of participants and beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are covered by a Plan that engages in the
Unrelated Sale, or any authorized employee or representative of these
entities;
(2) None of the persons described above in paragraphs (l)(1)(B)-(C)
shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of Citigroup, or
commercial or financial information which is privileged or
confidential; and
(3) Should Citigroup refuse to disclose information on the basis
that such information is exempt from disclosure, Citigroup shall, by
the close of the thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide a
written notice advising that person of the reasons for the refusal and
that the Department may request such information.
Section III. Sales of Auction Rate Securities From Plans to Citigroup:
Related to a Settlement Agreement
The restrictions of section 406(a)(1)(A) and (D) and section
406(b)(1) and (2) of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A), (D), and (E) of the Code, shall not apply, effective
February 1, 2008, to the sale by a Plan of an Auction Rate Security to
Citigroup, where such sale (a Settlement Sale) is related to, and made
in connection with, a Settlement Agreement, provided that the
conditions set forth in Section IV have been met.
Section IV. Conditions Applicable to Transactions Described in Section
III
(a) The terms and delivery of the Offer are consistent with the
requirements set forth in the Settlement Agreement and acceptance of
the Offer does not constitute a waiver of any claim of the tendering
Plan;
(b) The Offer or other documents available to the Plan specifically
describe, among other things:
(1) How a Plan may determine: the Auction Rate Securities held by
the Plan with Citigroup; the number of shares or par value of the
Auction Rate Securities; the interest or dividend amounts that are due
and unpaid with respect to the Auction Rate Securities; and (if
reliable information is available) the most recent rate information for
the Auction Rate Securities;
(2) The background of the Offer;
(3) That neither the tender of Auction Rate Securities nor the
purchase of any Auction Rate Securities pursuant to the Offer will
constitute a waiver of any claim of the tendering Plan;
(4) The methods and timing by which Plans may accept the Offer;
(5) The purchase dates, or the manner of determining the purchase
dates, for Auction Rate Securities tendered pursuant to the Offer;
(6) The timing for acceptance by Citigroup of tendered Auction Rate
Securities;
(7) The timing of payment for Auction Rate Securities accepted by
Citigroup for payment;
(8) The methods and timing by which a Plan may elect to withdraw
tendered Auction Rate Securities from the Offer;
(9) The expiration date of the Offer;
(10) The fact that Citigroup may make purchases of Auction Rate
Securities outside of the Offer and may otherwise buy, sell, hold or
seek to restructure,
[[Page 38555]]
redeem or otherwise dispose of the Auction Rate Securities;
(11) A description of the risk factors relating to the Offer as
Citigroup deems appropriate;
(12) How to obtain additional information concerning the Offer; and
(13) The manner in which information concerning material amendments
or changes to the Offer will be communicated to the Plan;
(c) The terms of the Settlement Sale are consistent with the
requirements set forth in the Settlement Agreement; and
(d) All of the conditions in Section II have been met.
Section V. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption:
(a) The term ``affiliate'' means any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with such other person;
(b) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual;
(c) The term ``Auction Rate Security'' or ``ARS'' means a security:
(1) That is either a debt instrument (generally with a long-term
nominal maturity) or preferred stock; and (2) with an interest rate or
dividend that is reset at specific intervals through a Dutch auction
process;
(d) A person is ``independent'' of Citigroup if the person is: (1)
not Citigroup or an affiliate; and (2) not a relative (as defined in
section 3(15) of the Act) of the party engaging in the transaction;
(e) The term ``Plan'' means an individual retirement account or
similar account described in section 4975(e)(1)(B) through (F) of the
Code (an IRA); an employee benefit plan as defined in section 3(3) of
the Act; or an entity holding plan assets within the meaning of 29 CFR
2510.3-101, as modified by section 3(42) of the Act; and
(f) The term ``Settlement Agreement'' means a legal settlement
involving Citigroup and a U.S. state or federal authority that provides
for the purchase of an ARS by Citigroup from a Plan.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective as of February 1, 2008.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on February 23, 2010 at 75
FR 8128.
For Further Information Contact: Brian Shiker of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8552. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the
Act, section 8477(c)(2) of the Federal Employees' Retirement System Act
of 1986, as amended (FERSA), and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason of section
4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code, shall not apply, effective
September 4, 2008, to the cash sales (the Sales) by the Barclays Global
Investors ``Money Market Fund'' and ``Cash Equivalent Fund II,'' which
are short-term collective investment funds (STIFs) managed or
maintained by Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (BGI, or together with
Barcal and any of their affiliates, collectively, ``the Applicant''),
of certain short-term debt instruments (the Notes) to Barcal, provided
that the following conditions are met:
(a) The Sales were one-time transactions for cash payment made on a
delivery versus payment (i.e., same day) basis in the amount described
in paragraph (b);
(b) The STIFs received an amount equal to the greater of:
(1) The amortized cost (including accrued and unpaid interest) of
the Notes, determined as of the dates of the Sales, or
(2) the fair market value (including accrued and unpaid interest)
of the Notes, determined by an independent third party source;
(c) The STIFs did not bear any commissions, transaction costs or
other expenses in connection with the Sales;
(d) The terms and conditions of the Sales were at least as
favorable to the STIFs as those available in an arm's-length
transaction with an unrelated party.
(e) BGI, as fiduciary of the STIFs, determined that the Sales were
in the best interest of the STIFs and any employee benefit plans (the
Plans) invested in the STIFs as of the dates of the Sales.
(f) BGI took all appropriate actions necessary to safeguard the
interests of the STIFs and any Plans invested in the STIFs in
connection with the Sales.
(g) If the exercise of any of Barcal's rights, claims, or causes of
action in connection with its ownership of the Notes results in Barcal
recovering from the issuer of the Notes, or from any third party, an
aggregate amount that is more than the sum of:
(1) The purchase price paid for such Notes by Barcal; and
(2) the interest due on the notes from and after the date Barcal
purchased the Notes from the STIFs, Barcal will refund such excess
amount promptly to the STIFs (after deducting all reasonable expenses
incurred in connection with the recovery);
(h) BGI maintains, or causes to be maintained, for a period of six
(6) years from the date of any covered transaction such records as are
necessary to enable the persons described below in paragraph (i)(1), to
determine whether the conditions of this exemption have been met,
except that--
(1) No party in interest with respect to a Plan which engages in
the covered transactions, other than BGI and its affiliates, shall be
subject to a civil penalty under section 502(i) of the Act or the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if such records are not
maintained, or not available for examination, as required, below, by
paragraph (i)(1);
(2) A separate prohibited transaction shall not be considered to
have occurred solely because due to circumstances beyond the control of
BGI, such records are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the six-
year period. (i)(1) Except as provided, below, in paragraph (i)(2), and
notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to, above, in paragraph (h) are
unconditionally available at their customary location for examination
during normal business hours by--
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department or of the Internal Revenue Service; or
(B) Any fiduciary of any Plan that engages in the covered
transactions, or any duly authorized employee or representative of such
fiduciary; or
(C) Any employer of participants and beneficiaries and any employee
organization whose members are covered by a Plan that engages in the
covered transactions, or any authorized employee or representative of
these entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of a Plan that engages in a
covered transaction, or duly authorized employee or representative of
such participant or beneficiary;
(2) None of the persons described, above, in paragraph (i)(1)(B)-
(D) shall be authorized to examine trade secrets of BGI, or commercial
or financial information which is privileged or confidential; and
(3) Should BGI refuse to disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from disclosure, BGI shall, by the close of
the thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide a written
notice advising that person of the reasons for the refusal and that the
Department may request such information.
[[Page 38556]]
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption (the Notice) published on March 15,
2010 at 75 FR 12308.
Effective Date: This exemption is effective September 4, 2008.
Written Comments
The only written comment received by the Department was submitted
by the Applicant. The Applicant requested changes with respect to
condition (i) of the Notice concerning the entities to whom the records
maintained pursuant to condition (h) of the Notice are required to be
made available by BGI. First, the Applicant requested that the records
need not be made unconditionally available to duly authorized employees
or representatives of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC)
because, unlike the cases involving Auction Rate Securities, the
subject Sales were not required by an SEC settlement; nor are the STIFs
within the jurisdiction of the SEC. The Department accepts these
representations by the Applicant and has amended the grant accordingly.
Second, the Applicant requested that the records need not be made
unconditionally available to any participant or beneficiary of a Plan
that engages in a covered transaction, or duly authorized employee or
representative of such participant or beneficiary. The Applicant noted
that there are nearly 1,000 Plans whose fiduciaries will have access to
these records. There are millions of participants in these Plans, none
of whom have a relationship with the Applicant. In order to protect the
confidentiality of Plan arrangements, every time a Plan participant
sought to review these records, the Applicant would be required to
contact a Plan fiduciary to verify that the participant was in fact a
participant in the Plan on the date of the transaction and is still a
participant in the Plan. This would cause the Applicant to spend
countless hours just so that a participant or his or her representative
could review material that the Plan fiduciary already had in its
possession. The Applicant stated that this would impose a considerable
and unwarranted burden. However, because participants and beneficiaries
of the Plans are affected by the subject Sales and have an interest in
the fiduciary management of their Plan assets, it is the Department's
view that they also should have access to the records maintained by
BGI, which are otherwise required to be maintained and made available
pursuant to the grant of exemptive relief. Accordingly, the Department
has not made this requested change to the condition contained in
section (i) of the Notice.
The Department has given full consideration to the entire record,
including the comment letter received. The Department has determined to
grant the exemption, with the one change as noted above.
For Further Information Contact: Gary H. Lefkowitz of the
Department, telephone (202) 693-8546. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A), 406(a)(1)(B),
406(a)(1)(D), 406(b)(1), and (b)(2) of the Act, and the sanctions
resulting from the application of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code, shall not apply to:
(i) the February 20, 2009 cash sale (the Sale), at aggregate cost basis
plus interest, by each of the Plans of interests in certain private
equity funds (the Funds) to the CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (the
Applicant), the sponsor of the Plans and a party in interest with
respect to the Plans, pursuant to a contract between the Applicant and
the trustee of the Plans concluded on that same date; (ii) the
September 14, 2009 payment by the Applicant of certain additional cash
amounts, including interest (the Top-Up Payments); to the Plans
pursuant to the terms of the foregoing contract; and (iii) the
extension of credit between the Plans and the Applicant from the date
of the Sale (February 20, 2009) to the date of the Top-Up Payments
(September 14, 2009), provided that the following conditions were
satisfied:
(a) An independent fiduciary reviewed the terms and conditions of
the Sale and of the Top-Up Payments prior to their execution, and
determined that both were protective of the interests of the Plans;
(b) The independent fiduciary determined that the terms and
conditions of both the Sale and of the Top-Up Payments were at least as
favorable to the Plans as those that would have been obtained in an
arm's length transaction between unrelated parties;
(c) The terms and conditions of both the Sale and of the Top-Up
Payments were at least as favorable to the Plans as those that would
have been obtained in an arm's length transaction between unrelated
parties; and
(d) The independent fiduciary provided its opinion in written
reports on behalf of the Plans as to the fairness and reasonableness of
the Sale of the Plans' interests in the Funds to the Applicant, and
determined that the terms of the original Sale and subsequent Top-Up
Payments were especially beneficial to each of the Plans because: (i)
On February 20, 2009, the Plans received a return of their aggregate
cost basis of their interests in the Funds (which cost basis was
determined by the independent fiduciary to exceed the aggregate fair
market value of the Plans' interests in the Funds as of October 31,
2008), plus interest accrued on the Funds from their date of
acquisition by each Plan through the date of the Sale; and (ii) On
September 14, 2009, the independent fiduciary determined that, in
instances where the fair market value of any Fund on December 31, 2008
exceeded its original cost basis, each of the Plans received a Top-Up
Payment on September 14, 2009 comprised of the increased value of such
Fund, plus interest accrued on such increased value from December 31,
2008 to the date of the Top-Up Payments (September 14, 2009).
Written Comments
The Notice of Proposed Exemption (The Notice), Published in the
Federal Register on April 2, 2010 beginning on page 16849, invited all
interested persons to submit written comments and requests for a
hearing to the Department within forty-five (45) days of the date of
its publication. At the close of the comment period, the Department
received a single written comment from two current beneficiaries of the
CUNA Mutual Pension Plan for Non-Represented Employees. While
expressing concern about the Plan's initial decision to invest in the
Funds, the comment letter was supportive of the proposed exemption for
the sale of the Plan's interests in the Funds as described in the
Notice. The Department did not receive any other written comments from
interested persons with respect to the Notice during the aforementioned
45-day comment period, nor did it receive any requests for a hearing.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the text of the Notice at 75 FR 16849.
For Further Information Contact: Mr. Mark Judge of the Department
at (202) 693-8550. (This is not a toll-free number).
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section
[[Page 38557]]
408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code does not
relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified person
from certain other provisions to which the exemption does not apply and
the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section 404 of the
Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the participants
and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in accordance
with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the
requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate
for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to and not in derogation of, any
other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or
administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the
fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory
exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption is subject to the express
condition that the material facts and representations contained in the
application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of June, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010-16097 Filed 7-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P