Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 38139-38143 [2010-16025]

Download as PDF 38139 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or TA–W No. Subject firm 72,755 .......................... DW Enterprise of Ashland, Inc. ............................................................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Location Subject firm 72,197 .................................................. Manpower, Inc., Workers Employed on-Site at IBM, Parts Sales Div & Parts Planning Div. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customers, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC .. 73,422 .................................................. 73,435 .................................................. 73,440 .................................................. 73,456 .................................................. 74,061 .................................................. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 73,864 73,865 73,866 73,867 74,147 I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 7, 2010 through June 11, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), and U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: June 24, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–16026 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Sacramento, CA Harrisburg, PA Orlando, FL Portland, OR Troy, MI Jkt 220001 Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met. Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Impact date Chadds Ford, PA Monroeville, PA Bethlehem, PA Harrisburg, PA Mount Pleasant, PA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 filed earlier covering the same petitioners. Location Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... ABB, Inc. ............................................. Impact date Harrisburg, PA Subject firm .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions TA–W No. Impact date Ashland, OH workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve TA–W No. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. Sfmt 4703 I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 38140 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W Subject firm Location 72,811 ............... Holo-Krome, Former Subsidiary of Danaher Tool Group, Leased Workers of Randstad. United States Metal Powders, Inc., Formerly, United States Bronze Powders, Leased Workers Theorem Corporation. Gelita USA Inc., Leased Workers of Advance Services and Manpower. ATI Wah Chang, Allegheny Technologies, Inc .................. Total Lubricants USA, Inc., A Subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, Inc. West Hartford, CT ............... November 4, 2008. Flemington, NJ .................... November 6, 2008. Sergeant Bluff, IA ................ March 3, 2009. Albany, OR .......................... Rockingham, NC ................. April 14, 2009. April 9, 2009. 72,839 ............... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 73,648 ............... 73,936 ............... 73,942 ............... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 Impact date services) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 38141 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W Subject firm Location 71,551A ............. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Networking and Multimedia Group, Leased Workers of Synergy Services, etc. Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC, Commercial Vehicle Systems, ArvinMeritor, Leased Workers Pinnacle. JP Morgan Chase and Company, Treasury and Securities Services, Automated Clearing House Operations. International Thermal Systems LLC, Leased Workers Argus, Faith Technologies, Products Services, etc. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Operations Division, Alcatel-Lucent Barnes Aerospace, Barnes Group, Inc.; Leased Workers from Diversified Design. Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from Phillips Staffing and Aquent. Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from 24 Seven, Inc. Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Window Fashions, LLC, Springs Industries, Inc .. Corning Cable Systems, Leased Workers from Adecco ... ACS Enterprise Solutions, Inc., Waite Park Branch, Affiliate Of Affiliated Computer Services, (aka AVS, Xerox Company). MeadWestvaco Corporation, Global Business Services, Leased Workers from Manpower, etc. CompuCredit Holdings Corporation, Formerly CompuCredit Corporation, Credit Cards-Collections Division. Cummins, Inc., Cummins Components Fuel Systems Business Unit, Leased Workers of Volt, etc. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Lincoln & Allen Division, Leased Workers of Hands On Demand, Inc. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company ......................... Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Haagen Print Division. Lipper, Thomson Reuters Market, Leased Workers Job Store Staffing, etc. CIGNA Healthcare, Inc., Customer Service Department, Leased Workers from Prounlimited. WellPoint, Inc., West Host Provider, Leased Workers from Kelly Services, etc. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, United Parcel Service, Leased Workers Manpower, Spherion etc. Ingersoll Rand, Hussman Corporation, Climate Solutions, Leased Workers from Procure Staff. Covance Research Products, Leased Workers from Aerotek and WSI. IMS Health Incorporated, Shared Business Services Division, Leased Workers Kelly Services. Magna Modular Systems, AIM Systems-St. Louis, Magna International America. Atlas Copco, Secoroc, LLC, Leased Workers Express Employment Professionals. Intel Corporation, Corporate Services, D2 Operations ...... Intel Corporation, California Technology and Manufacturing, D2 Operations. Austin, TX ............................ July 1, 2008. Fletcher, NC ........................ September 16, 2008. Belleville, MI ........................ October 1, 2008. Milwaukee, WI ..................... October 16, 2008. Raleigh, NC ......................... West Chester, OH ............... December 10, 2008. January 5, 2009. Fort Mill, SC ......................... January 20, 2009. New York, NY ...................... January 20, 2009. Bentonville, AR .................... Minneapolis, MN .................. Plano, TX ............................. Santa Ana, CA ..................... Keller, TX ............................. Waite Park, MN ................... January 20, 2009. January 20, 2009. January 20, 2009. February 1, 2009. February 10, 2009. December 16, 2008. Glen Allen, VA ..................... March 19, 2009. Wilkesboro, NC .................... March 25, 2009. El Paso, TX ......................... April 19, 2009. Portland, OR ........................ April 21, 2009. Portland, OR ........................ Santa Barbara, CA .............. April 21, 2009. April 21, 2009. Denver, CO .......................... April 23, 2009. Fort Scott, KS ...................... April 26, 2009. Denver, CO .......................... April 27, 2009. Dunmore, PA ....................... April 21, 2009. Bridgeton, MO ..................... April 5, 2009. Kalamazoo, MI ..................... May 11, 2009. Bethlehem, PA ..................... May 13, 2009. Dupo, IL ............................... May 18, 2009. Roanoke, VA ....................... May 24, 2009. Santa Clara, CA .................. Santa Clara, CA .................. July 8, 2010. May 15, 2010. 72,332 ............... 72,487 ............... 72,615 ............... 73,178 ............... 73,229 ............... 73,330 ............... 73,330A ............. 73,330B ............. 73,330C ............. 73,330D ............. 73,402 ............... 73,476 ............... 73,529 ............... 73,790 ............... 73,798 ............... 73,969 ............... 73,984 ............... 73,984A ............. 73,985 ............... 73,994 ............... 74,006 ............... 74,013 ............... 74,027 ............... 74,060 ............... 74,075 ............... 74,087 ............... 74,121 ............... 74,155 ............... 74,213 ............... 74,214 ............... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers TA–W 72,481 72,703 73,077 73,598 73,946 are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. Subject firm ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... VerDate Mar<15>2010 Impact date Location Fulton Manufacturing Industries, LLC ................................ Young Touchstone, Wabtec Corporation .......................... Grupo Antolin, Grupo Antolin North America .................... Biotech Industries, LLC ...................................................... Kirkhill-TA Co., Haskon Division; Esterline Technologies; Leased Workers from Spherion. Brecksville, OH .................... Lexington, TN ...................... Belvidere, IL ......................... Newton, NC ......................... Taunton, MA ........................ 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM Impact date October 2, 2008. October 27, 2008. December 9, 2008. February 28, 2009. April 15, 2009. 01JYN1 38142 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W Subject firm Location 73,959 ............... 74,069 ............... RJR Transportation, Inc. .................................................... Nestaway LLC, Subsidiary of Leggett and Platt ................ Lathrop, CA ......................... McKenzie, TN ...................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section TA–W 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to Subject firm 72,219 ............... In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility March 22, 2009. May 7, 2009. apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. Location USF Holland, Inc., A Subsidiary of YRC Worldwide, Inc. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance Impact date Impact date Jackson, MI ......................... criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or September 3, 2008. (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,751 ................ RHealth, LLC .......................................................................... Memphis, TN ......................... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign Impact date country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,018 ................ 72,037 ................ Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc .............................. General Cable Industries, Inc., General Cable Corporation, Leased Workers Nesco Resources, etc. Runia Transportation, Inc. ...................................................... DSC Window Fashions, Inc. .................................................. Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Embarq Corporation; CenturyLink, New Bern Call Center. Dowell Schlumberger ............................................................. Oldcastle Glass Engineered Products ................................... Rexam Healthcare Packaging, Inc. ........................................ USA Mobility Wireless, Inc., Key Account Manager (KAM) Group. BCD Travel USA, LLC, Boise Siemens Unit ......................... Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep ........................................................ United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 136 ................................. Specialty Minerals, Inc. .......................................................... Portland, CT ........................... Lawrenceburg, KY ................. 72,239 ................ 72,410 ................ 72,908 ................ 72,916 73,012 73,436 73,517 ................ ................ ................ ................ 73,560 73,840 73,989 74,057 ................ ................ ................ ................ The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of Impact date Eugene, OR ........................... Portland, OR .......................... New Bern, NC ........................ Sonora, TX ............................. Bloomsburg, PA ..................... Rossville, GA ......................... Plano, TX ............................... Boise, ID ................................ Detroit, MI .............................. Fenton, MO ............................ Franklin, VA ........................... services from a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,103 ................ 74,116 ................ Marine Corps Logistics Base ................................................. Washington Department of Transportation, Olympic Division, Aberdeen Maintenance, Chehalis Drawbridge Tenders. Barstow, CA ........................... Aberdeen, WA ....................... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. Impact date The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,146 ................ 73,177 ................ Dassault Systemes Americas Corporation ............................ Century Aluminum of Kentucky, GP ...................................... Woodland Hills, CA ................ Hawesville, KY ....................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM Impact date 01JYN1 38143 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,825 ................ Steel Fabricators of Monroe, LLC .......................................... Monroe, LA ............................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under section 223(b), and Impact date therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,708 ................ Hayden Twist Drill .................................................................. Warren, MI ............................. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve Impact date no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,277 ................ 72,939 ................ 73,835 ................ Hickory White Upholstery ....................................................... Span America Inc. .................................................................. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Medical Bill Processing and Production Center Support. High Point, NC ....................... Worcester, PA ........................ Syracuse, NY ......................... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department’s previous Impact date negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,947 ................ Supreme Foam, Inc. ............................................................... Archdale, NC ......................... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at https:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: June 24, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–16025 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–PS VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 12, 2010. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 12, 2010. Copies of these petitions may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 126 (Thursday, July 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38139-38143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles

[[Page 38140]]

incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

[[Page 38141]]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
71,551A...................... Freescale Semiconductor, Austin, TX.............. July 1, 2008.
Inc., Networking and
Multimedia Group, Leased
Workers of Synergy Services,
etc.
72,332....................... Meritor Heavy Vehicle Fletcher, NC............ September 16, 2008.
Systems, LLC, Commercial
Vehicle Systems,
ArvinMeritor, Leased Workers
Pinnacle.
72,487....................... JP Morgan Chase and Company, Belleville, MI.......... October 1, 2008.
Treasury and Securities
Services, Automated Clearing
House Operations.
72,615....................... International Thermal Systems Milwaukee, WI........... October 16, 2008.
LLC, Leased Workers Argus,
Faith Technologies, Products
Services, etc.
73,178....................... Alcatel-Lucent USA, Raleigh, NC............. December 10, 2008.
Operations Division, Alcatel-
Lucent.
73,229....................... Barnes Aerospace, Barnes West Chester, OH........ January 5, 2009.
Group, Inc.; Leased Workers
from Diversified Design.
73,330....................... Springs Global U.S., Inc., Fort Mill, SC........... January 20, 2009.
Leased Workers from Phillips
Staffing and Aquent.
73,330A...................... Springs Global U.S., Inc., New York, NY............ January 20, 2009.
Leased Workers from 24
Seven, Inc.
73,330B...................... Springs Global U.S., Inc..... Bentonville, AR......... January 20, 2009.
73,330C...................... Springs Global U.S., Inc..... Minneapolis, MN......... January 20, 2009.
73,330D...................... Springs Global U.S., Inc..... Plano, TX............... January 20, 2009.
73,402....................... Springs Window Fashions, LLC, Santa Ana, CA........... February 1, 2009.
Springs Industries, Inc.
73,476....................... Corning Cable Systems, Leased Keller, TX.............. February 10, 2009.
Workers from Adecco.
73,529....................... ACS Enterprise Solutions, Waite Park, MN.......... December 16, 2008.
Inc., Waite Park Branch,
Affiliate Of Affiliated
Computer Services, (aka AVS,
Xerox Company).
73,790....................... MeadWestvaco Corporation, Glen Allen, VA.......... March 19, 2009.
Global Business Services,
Leased Workers from
Manpower, etc.
73,798....................... CompuCredit Holdings Wilkesboro, NC.......... March 25, 2009.
Corporation, Formerly
CompuCredit Corporation,
Credit Cards-Collections
Division.
73,969....................... Cummins, Inc., Cummins El Paso, TX............. April 19, 2009.
Components Fuel Systems
Business Unit, Leased
Workers of Volt, etc.
73,984....................... Graphic Arts Center Portland, OR............ April 21, 2009.
Publishing Company, Lincoln
& Allen Division, Leased
Workers of Hands On Demand,
Inc.
73,984A...................... Graphic Arts Center Portland, OR............ April 21, 2009.
Publishing Company.
73,985....................... Graphic Arts Center Santa Barbara, CA....... April 21, 2009.
Publishing Company, Haagen
Print Division.
73,994....................... Lipper, Thomson Reuters Denver, CO.............. April 23, 2009.
Market, Leased Workers Job
Store Staffing, etc.
74,006....................... CIGNA Healthcare, Inc., Fort Scott, KS.......... April 26, 2009.
Customer Service Department,
Leased Workers from
Prounlimited.
74,013....................... WellPoint, Inc., West Host Denver, CO.............. April 27, 2009.
Provider, Leased Workers
from Kelly Services, etc.
74,027....................... UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Dunmore, PA............. April 21, 2009.
United Parcel Service,
Leased Workers Manpower,
Spherion etc.
74,060....................... Ingersoll Rand, Hussman Bridgeton, MO........... April 5, 2009.
Corporation, Climate
Solutions, Leased Workers
from Procure Staff.
74,075....................... Covance Research Products, Kalamazoo, MI........... May 11, 2009.
Leased Workers from Aerotek
and WSI.
74,087....................... IMS Health Incorporated, Bethlehem, PA........... May 13, 2009.
Shared Business Services
Division, Leased Workers
Kelly Services.
74,121....................... Magna Modular Systems, AIM Dupo, IL................ May 18, 2009.
Systems-St. Louis, Magna
International America.
74,155....................... Atlas Copco, Secoroc, LLC, Roanoke, VA............. May 24, 2009.
Leased Workers Express
Employment Professionals.
74,213....................... Intel Corporation, Corporate Santa Clara, CA......... July 8, 2010.
Services, D2 Operations.
74,214....................... Intel Corporation, California Santa Clara, CA......... May 15, 2010.
Technology and
Manufacturing, D2 Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

[[Page 38142]]

73,959....................... RJR Transportation, Inc...... Lathrop, CA............. March 22, 2009.
74,069....................... Nestaway LLC, Subsidiary of McKenzie, TN............ May 7, 2009.
Leggett and Platt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,018....................... Smurfit-Stone Container Portland, CT............ ........................
Enterprises, Inc.
72,037....................... General Cable Industries, Lawrenceburg, KY........ ........................
Inc., General Cable
Corporation, Leased Workers
Nesco Resources, etc.
72,239....................... Runia Transportation, Inc.... Eugene, OR.............. ........................
72,410....................... DSC Window Fashions, Inc..... Portland, OR............ ........................
72,908....................... Carolina Telephone and New Bern, NC............ ........................
Telegraph Company LLC,
Embarq Corporation;
CenturyLink, New Bern Call
Center.
72,916....................... Dowell Schlumberger.......... Sonora, TX.............. ........................
73,012....................... Oldcastle Glass Engineered Bloomsburg, PA.......... ........................
Products.
73,436....................... Rexam Healthcare Packaging, Rossville, GA........... ........................
Inc..
73,517....................... USA Mobility Wireless, Inc., Plano, TX............... ........................
Key Account Manager (KAM)
Group.
73,560....................... BCD Travel USA, LLC, Boise Boise, ID............... ........................
Siemens Unit.
73,840....................... Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep....... Detroit, MI............. ........................
73,989....................... United Auto Workers (UAW) Fenton, MO.............. ........................
Local 136.
74,057....................... Specialty Minerals, Inc...... Franklin, VA............ ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of services from a foreign
country) of section 222 have not been met.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

[[Page 38143]]

73,825....................... Steel Fabricators of Monroe, Monroe, LA.............. ........................
LLC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions
related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same
worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information
or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the
Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further
investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. Copies of
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA),
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available
on the Department's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under
the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: June 24, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-16025 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-PS

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.