Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 38139-38143 [2010-16025]

Download as PDF 38139 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or TA–W No. Subject firm 72,755 .......................... DW Enterprise of Ashland, Inc. ............................................................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Location Subject firm 72,197 .................................................. Manpower, Inc., Workers Employed on-Site at IBM, Parts Sales Div & Parts Planning Div. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customers, Quality. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Consumer Centers Sales, Mobility Customer, Quality. Plastic Omnium Auto Exteriors, LLC .. 73,422 .................................................. 73,435 .................................................. 73,440 .................................................. 73,456 .................................................. 74,061 .................................................. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 73,864 73,865 73,866 73,867 74,147 I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 7, 2010 through June 11, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), and U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at http:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: June 24, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–16026 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Sacramento, CA Harrisburg, PA Orlando, FL Portland, OR Troy, MI Jkt 220001 Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met. Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Impact date Chadds Ford, PA Monroeville, PA Bethlehem, PA Harrisburg, PA Mount Pleasant, PA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PO 00000 filed earlier covering the same petitioners. Location Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... Super Media, LLC ............................... ABB, Inc. ............................................. Impact date Harrisburg, PA Subject firm .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Location because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions TA–W No. Impact date Ashland, OH workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve TA–W No. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. Sfmt 4703 I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 38140 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W Subject firm Location 72,811 ............... Holo-Krome, Former Subsidiary of Danaher Tool Group, Leased Workers of Randstad. United States Metal Powders, Inc., Formerly, United States Bronze Powders, Leased Workers Theorem Corporation. Gelita USA Inc., Leased Workers of Advance Services and Manpower. ATI Wah Chang, Allegheny Technologies, Inc .................. Total Lubricants USA, Inc., A Subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, Inc. West Hartford, CT ............... November 4, 2008. Flemington, NJ .................... November 6, 2008. Sergeant Bluff, IA ................ March 3, 2009. Albany, OR .......................... Rockingham, NC ................. April 14, 2009. April 9, 2009. 72,839 ............... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 73,648 ............... 73,936 ............... 73,942 ............... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 Impact date services) of the Trade Act have been met. PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 38141 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W Subject firm Location 71,551A ............. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Networking and Multimedia Group, Leased Workers of Synergy Services, etc. Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems, LLC, Commercial Vehicle Systems, ArvinMeritor, Leased Workers Pinnacle. JP Morgan Chase and Company, Treasury and Securities Services, Automated Clearing House Operations. International Thermal Systems LLC, Leased Workers Argus, Faith Technologies, Products Services, etc. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Operations Division, Alcatel-Lucent Barnes Aerospace, Barnes Group, Inc.; Leased Workers from Diversified Design. Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from Phillips Staffing and Aquent. Springs Global U.S., Inc., Leased Workers from 24 Seven, Inc. Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Global U.S., Inc. ................................................... Springs Window Fashions, LLC, Springs Industries, Inc .. Corning Cable Systems, Leased Workers from Adecco ... ACS Enterprise Solutions, Inc., Waite Park Branch, Affiliate Of Affiliated Computer Services, (aka AVS, Xerox Company). MeadWestvaco Corporation, Global Business Services, Leased Workers from Manpower, etc. CompuCredit Holdings Corporation, Formerly CompuCredit Corporation, Credit Cards-Collections Division. Cummins, Inc., Cummins Components Fuel Systems Business Unit, Leased Workers of Volt, etc. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Lincoln & Allen Division, Leased Workers of Hands On Demand, Inc. Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company ......................... Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, Haagen Print Division. Lipper, Thomson Reuters Market, Leased Workers Job Store Staffing, etc. CIGNA Healthcare, Inc., Customer Service Department, Leased Workers from Prounlimited. WellPoint, Inc., West Host Provider, Leased Workers from Kelly Services, etc. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, United Parcel Service, Leased Workers Manpower, Spherion etc. Ingersoll Rand, Hussman Corporation, Climate Solutions, Leased Workers from Procure Staff. Covance Research Products, Leased Workers from Aerotek and WSI. IMS Health Incorporated, Shared Business Services Division, Leased Workers Kelly Services. Magna Modular Systems, AIM Systems-St. Louis, Magna International America. Atlas Copco, Secoroc, LLC, Leased Workers Express Employment Professionals. Intel Corporation, Corporate Services, D2 Operations ...... Intel Corporation, California Technology and Manufacturing, D2 Operations. Austin, TX ............................ July 1, 2008. Fletcher, NC ........................ September 16, 2008. Belleville, MI ........................ October 1, 2008. Milwaukee, WI ..................... October 16, 2008. Raleigh, NC ......................... West Chester, OH ............... December 10, 2008. January 5, 2009. Fort Mill, SC ......................... January 20, 2009. New York, NY ...................... January 20, 2009. Bentonville, AR .................... Minneapolis, MN .................. Plano, TX ............................. Santa Ana, CA ..................... Keller, TX ............................. Waite Park, MN ................... January 20, 2009. January 20, 2009. January 20, 2009. February 1, 2009. February 10, 2009. December 16, 2008. Glen Allen, VA ..................... March 19, 2009. Wilkesboro, NC .................... March 25, 2009. El Paso, TX ......................... April 19, 2009. Portland, OR ........................ April 21, 2009. Portland, OR ........................ Santa Barbara, CA .............. April 21, 2009. April 21, 2009. Denver, CO .......................... April 23, 2009. Fort Scott, KS ...................... April 26, 2009. Denver, CO .......................... April 27, 2009. Dunmore, PA ....................... April 21, 2009. Bridgeton, MO ..................... April 5, 2009. Kalamazoo, MI ..................... May 11, 2009. Bethlehem, PA ..................... May 13, 2009. Dupo, IL ............................... May 18, 2009. Roanoke, VA ....................... May 24, 2009. Santa Clara, CA .................. Santa Clara, CA .................. July 8, 2010. May 15, 2010. 72,332 ............... 72,487 ............... 72,615 ............... 73,178 ............... 73,229 ............... 73,330 ............... 73,330A ............. 73,330B ............. 73,330C ............. 73,330D ............. 73,402 ............... 73,476 ............... 73,529 ............... 73,790 ............... 73,798 ............... 73,969 ............... 73,984 ............... 73,984A ............. 73,985 ............... 73,994 ............... 74,006 ............... 74,013 ............... 74,027 ............... 74,060 ............... 74,075 ............... 74,087 ............... 74,121 ............... 74,155 ............... 74,213 ............... 74,214 ............... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers TA–W 72,481 72,703 73,077 73,598 73,946 are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. Subject firm ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... VerDate Mar<15>2010 Impact date Location Fulton Manufacturing Industries, LLC ................................ Young Touchstone, Wabtec Corporation .......................... Grupo Antolin, Grupo Antolin North America .................... Biotech Industries, LLC ...................................................... Kirkhill-TA Co., Haskon Division; Esterline Technologies; Leased Workers from Spherion. Brecksville, OH .................... Lexington, TN ...................... Belvidere, IL ......................... Newton, NC ......................... Taunton, MA ........................ 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM Impact date October 2, 2008. October 27, 2008. December 9, 2008. February 28, 2009. April 15, 2009. 01JYN1 38142 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W Subject firm Location 73,959 ............... 74,069 ............... RJR Transportation, Inc. .................................................... Nestaway LLC, Subsidiary of Leggett and Platt ................ Lathrop, CA ......................... McKenzie, TN ...................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of section TA–W 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to Subject firm 72,219 ............... In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility March 22, 2009. May 7, 2009. apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. Location USF Holland, Inc., A Subsidiary of YRC Worldwide, Inc. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance Impact date Impact date Jackson, MI ......................... criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or September 3, 2008. (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,751 ................ RHealth, LLC .......................................................................... Memphis, TN ......................... The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign Impact date country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,018 ................ 72,037 ................ Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc .............................. General Cable Industries, Inc., General Cable Corporation, Leased Workers Nesco Resources, etc. Runia Transportation, Inc. ...................................................... DSC Window Fashions, Inc. .................................................. Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Embarq Corporation; CenturyLink, New Bern Call Center. Dowell Schlumberger ............................................................. Oldcastle Glass Engineered Products ................................... Rexam Healthcare Packaging, Inc. ........................................ USA Mobility Wireless, Inc., Key Account Manager (KAM) Group. BCD Travel USA, LLC, Boise Siemens Unit ......................... Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep ........................................................ United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 136 ................................. Specialty Minerals, Inc. .......................................................... Portland, CT ........................... Lawrenceburg, KY ................. 72,239 ................ 72,410 ................ 72,908 ................ 72,916 73,012 73,436 73,517 ................ ................ ................ ................ 73,560 73,840 73,989 74,057 ................ ................ ................ ................ The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of Impact date Eugene, OR ........................... Portland, OR .......................... New Bern, NC ........................ Sonora, TX ............................. Bloomsburg, PA ..................... Rossville, GA ......................... Plano, TX ............................... Boise, ID ................................ Detroit, MI .............................. Fenton, MO ............................ Franklin, VA ........................... services from a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,103 ................ 74,116 ................ Marine Corps Logistics Base ................................................. Washington Department of Transportation, Olympic Division, Aberdeen Maintenance, Chehalis Drawbridge Tenders. Barstow, CA ........................... Aberdeen, WA ....................... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. Impact date The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,146 ................ 73,177 ................ Dassault Systemes Americas Corporation ............................ Century Aluminum of Kentucky, GP ...................................... Woodland Hills, CA ................ Hawesville, KY ....................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM Impact date 01JYN1 38143 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 126 / Thursday, July 1, 2010 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,825 ................ Steel Fabricators of Monroe, LLC .......................................... Monroe, LA ............................ The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under section 223(b), and Impact date therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 73,708 ................ Hayden Twist Drill .................................................................. Warren, MI ............................. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve Impact date no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,277 ................ 72,939 ................ 73,835 ................ Hickory White Upholstery ....................................................... Span America Inc. .................................................................. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Medical Bill Processing and Production Center Support. High Point, NC ....................... Worcester, PA ........................ Syracuse, NY ......................... The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department’s previous Impact date negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 72,947 ................ Supreme Foam, Inc. ............................................................... Archdale, NC ......................... jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available on the Department’s Web site at http:// www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: June 24, 2010. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–16025 Filed 6–30–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–PS VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:02 Jun 30, 2010 Jkt 220001 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 12, 2010. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than July 12, 2010. Copies of these petitions may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 126 (Thursday, July 1, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38139-38143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles

[[Page 38140]]

incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have 
increased;
    (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such 
agency; and
    (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) Either--
    (A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             TA-W                       Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,811.......................  Holo-Krome, Former Subsidiary  West Hartford, CT.......  November 4, 2008.
                                of Danaher Tool Group,
                                Leased Workers of Randstad.
72,839.......................  United States Metal Powders,   Flemington, NJ..........  November 6, 2008.
                                Inc., Formerly, United
                                States Bronze Powders,
                                Leased Workers Theorem
                                Corporation.
73,648.......................  Gelita USA Inc., Leased        Sergeant Bluff, IA......  March 3, 2009.
                                Workers of Advance Services
                                and Manpower.
73,936.......................  ATI Wah Chang, Allegheny       Albany, OR..............  April 14, 2009.
                                Technologies, Inc.
73,942.......................  Total Lubricants USA, Inc., A  Rockingham, NC..........  April 9, 2009.
                                Subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine,
                                Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

[[Page 38141]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             TA-W                       Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
71,551A......................  Freescale Semiconductor,       Austin, TX..............  July 1, 2008.
                                Inc., Networking and
                                Multimedia Group, Leased
                                Workers of Synergy Services,
                                etc.
72,332.......................  Meritor Heavy Vehicle          Fletcher, NC............  September 16, 2008.
                                Systems, LLC, Commercial
                                Vehicle Systems,
                                ArvinMeritor, Leased Workers
                                Pinnacle.
72,487.......................  JP Morgan Chase and Company,   Belleville, MI..........  October 1, 2008.
                                Treasury and Securities
                                Services, Automated Clearing
                                House Operations.
72,615.......................  International Thermal Systems  Milwaukee, WI...........  October 16, 2008.
                                LLC, Leased Workers Argus,
                                Faith Technologies, Products
                                Services, etc.
73,178.......................  Alcatel-Lucent USA,            Raleigh, NC.............  December 10, 2008.
                                Operations Division, Alcatel-
                                Lucent.
73,229.......................  Barnes Aerospace, Barnes       West Chester, OH........  January 5, 2009.
                                Group, Inc.; Leased Workers
                                from Diversified Design.
73,330.......................  Springs Global U.S., Inc.,     Fort Mill, SC...........  January 20, 2009.
                                Leased Workers from Phillips
                                Staffing and Aquent.
73,330A......................  Springs Global U.S., Inc.,     New York, NY............  January 20, 2009.
                                Leased Workers from 24
                                Seven, Inc.
73,330B......................  Springs Global U.S., Inc.....  Bentonville, AR.........  January 20, 2009.
73,330C......................  Springs Global U.S., Inc.....  Minneapolis, MN.........  January 20, 2009.
73,330D......................  Springs Global U.S., Inc.....  Plano, TX...............  January 20, 2009.
73,402.......................  Springs Window Fashions, LLC,  Santa Ana, CA...........  February 1, 2009.
                                Springs Industries, Inc.
73,476.......................  Corning Cable Systems, Leased  Keller, TX..............  February 10, 2009.
                                Workers from Adecco.
73,529.......................  ACS Enterprise Solutions,      Waite Park, MN..........  December 16, 2008.
                                Inc., Waite Park Branch,
                                Affiliate Of Affiliated
                                Computer Services, (aka AVS,
                                Xerox Company).
73,790.......................  MeadWestvaco Corporation,      Glen Allen, VA..........  March 19, 2009.
                                Global Business Services,
                                Leased Workers from
                                Manpower, etc.
73,798.......................  CompuCredit Holdings           Wilkesboro, NC..........  March 25, 2009.
                                Corporation, Formerly
                                CompuCredit Corporation,
                                Credit Cards-Collections
                                Division.
73,969.......................  Cummins, Inc., Cummins         El Paso, TX.............  April 19, 2009.
                                Components Fuel Systems
                                Business Unit, Leased
                                Workers of Volt, etc.
73,984.......................  Graphic Arts Center            Portland, OR............  April 21, 2009.
                                Publishing Company, Lincoln
                                & Allen Division, Leased
                                Workers of Hands On Demand,
                                Inc.
73,984A......................  Graphic Arts Center            Portland, OR............  April 21, 2009.
                                Publishing Company.
73,985.......................  Graphic Arts Center            Santa Barbara, CA.......  April 21, 2009.
                                Publishing Company, Haagen
                                Print Division.
73,994.......................  Lipper, Thomson Reuters        Denver, CO..............  April 23, 2009.
                                Market, Leased Workers Job
                                Store Staffing, etc.
74,006.......................  CIGNA Healthcare, Inc.,        Fort Scott, KS..........  April 26, 2009.
                                Customer Service Department,
                                Leased Workers from
                                Prounlimited.
74,013.......................  WellPoint, Inc., West Host     Denver, CO..............  April 27, 2009.
                                Provider, Leased Workers
                                from Kelly Services, etc.
74,027.......................  UPS Supply Chain Solutions,    Dunmore, PA.............  April 21, 2009.
                                United Parcel Service,
                                Leased Workers Manpower,
                                Spherion etc.
74,060.......................  Ingersoll Rand, Hussman        Bridgeton, MO...........  April 5, 2009.
                                Corporation, Climate
                                Solutions, Leased Workers
                                from Procure Staff.
74,075.......................  Covance Research Products,     Kalamazoo, MI...........  May 11, 2009.
                                Leased Workers from Aerotek
                                and WSI.
74,087.......................  IMS Health Incorporated,       Bethlehem, PA...........  May 13, 2009.
                                Shared Business Services
                                Division, Leased Workers
                                Kelly Services.
74,121.......................  Magna Modular Systems, AIM     Dupo, IL................  May 18, 2009.
                                Systems-St. Louis, Magna
                                International America.
74,155.......................  Atlas Copco, Secoroc, LLC,     Roanoke, VA.............  May 24, 2009.
                                Leased Workers Express
                                Employment Professionals.
74,213.......................  Intel Corporation, Corporate   Santa Clara, CA.........  July 8, 2010.
                                Services, D2 Operations.
74,214.......................  Intel Corporation, California  Santa Clara, CA.........  May 15, 2010.
                                Technology and
                                Manufacturing, D2 Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible 
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             TA-W                       Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,481.......................  Fulton Manufacturing           Brecksville, OH.........  October 2, 2008.
                                Industries, LLC.
72,703.......................  Young Touchstone, Wabtec       Lexington, TN...........  October 27, 2008.
                                Corporation.
73,077.......................  Grupo Antolin, Grupo Antolin   Belvidere, IL...........  December 9, 2008.
                                North America.
73,598.......................  Biotech Industries, LLC......  Newton, NC..............  February 28, 2009.
73,946.......................  Kirkhill-TA Co., Haskon        Taunton, MA.............  April 15, 2009.
                                Division; Esterline
                                Technologies; Leased Workers
                                from Spherion.

[[Page 38142]]

 
73,959.......................  RJR Transportation, Inc......  Lathrop, CA.............  March 22, 2009.
74,069.......................  Nestaway LLC, Subsidiary of    McKenzie, TN............  May 7, 2009.
                                Leggett and Platt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are 
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             TA-W                       Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,219.......................  USF Holland, Inc., A           Jackson, MI.............  September 3, 2008.
                                Subsidiary of YRC Worldwide,
                                Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph 
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of 
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,751.......................  RHealth, LLC.................  Memphis, TN.............  ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,018.......................  Smurfit-Stone Container        Portland, CT............  ........................
                                Enterprises, Inc.
72,037.......................  General Cable Industries,      Lawrenceburg, KY........  ........................
                                Inc., General Cable
                                Corporation, Leased Workers
                                Nesco Resources, etc.
72,239.......................  Runia Transportation, Inc....  Eugene, OR..............  ........................
72,410.......................  DSC Window Fashions, Inc.....  Portland, OR............  ........................
72,908.......................  Carolina Telephone and         New Bern, NC............  ........................
                                Telegraph Company LLC,
                                Embarq Corporation;
                                CenturyLink, New Bern Call
                                Center.
72,916.......................  Dowell Schlumberger..........  Sonora, TX..............  ........................
73,012.......................  Oldcastle Glass Engineered     Bloomsburg, PA..........  ........................
                                Products.
73,436.......................  Rexam Healthcare Packaging,    Rossville, GA...........  ........................
                                Inc..
73,517.......................  USA Mobility Wireless, Inc.,   Plano, TX...............  ........................
                                Key Account Manager (KAM)
                                Group.
73,560.......................  BCD Travel USA, LLC, Boise     Boise, ID...............  ........................
                                Siemens Unit.
73,840.......................  Lochmoor Chrysler Jeep.......  Detroit, MI.............  ........................
73,989.......................  United Auto Workers (UAW)      Fenton, MO..............  ........................
                                Local 136.
74,057.......................  Specialty Minerals, Inc......  Franklin, VA............  ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs 
(b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of services from a foreign 
country) of section 222 have not been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,103.......................  Marine Corps Logistics Base..  Barstow, CA.............  ........................
74,116.......................  Washington Department of       Aberdeen, WA............  ........................
                                Transportation, Olympic
                                Division, Aberdeen
                                Maintenance, Chehalis
                                Drawbridge Tenders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register 
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act 
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these 
petitions.
    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,146.......................  Dassault Systemes Americas     Woodland Hills, CA......  ........................
                                Corporation.
73,177.......................  Century Aluminum of Kentucky,  Hawesville, KY..........  ........................
                                GP.

[[Page 38143]]

 
73,825.......................  Steel Fabricators of Monroe,   Monroe, LA..............  ........................
                                LLC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the 
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be 
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. 
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the 
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under 
section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker 
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed 
invalid.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
73,708.......................  Hayden Twist Drill...........  Warren, MI..............  ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active 
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases 
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be 
covered by more than one certification at a time.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,277.......................  Hickory White Upholstery.....  High Point, NC..........  ........................
72,939.......................  Span America Inc.............  Worcester, PA...........  ........................
73,835.......................  Hartford Financial Services    Syracuse, NY............  ........................
                                Group, Inc., Medical Bill
                                Processing and Production
                                Center Support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following determinations terminating investigations were issued 
because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions 
related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same 
worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information 
or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the 
Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further 
investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           TA-W No.                     Subject firm                  Location                 Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
72,947.......................  Supreme Foam, Inc............  Archdale, NC............  ........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of June 14, 2010 through June 18, 2010. Copies of 
these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information 
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to 
FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These determinations also are available 
on the Department's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 
the searchable listing of determinations.

    Dated: June 24, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-16025 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-PS