Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the People's Republic of China, 37382-37384 [2010-15912]
Download as PDF
37382
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
petitions to cancel, notices of
opposition, appeals, extensions of time
to file an opposition, and additional
papers for ex parte and inter partes
cases electronically to keep a copy of
the acknowledgment receipt as clear
evidence that the file was received by
the USPTO on the date noted. The
USPTO estimates that it takes 5 seconds
(0.001 hours) to print the
acknowledgment receipt and that 68,200
petitions, notices, extensions, and other
papers will be submitted electronically,
for a burden of 68 hours. Using the
paraprofessional rate of $100 per hour,
the USPTO estimates that the total
recordkeeping cost for this collection
will be $6,800 per year.
There is also annual nonhour cost
burden in the way of filing fees
associated with this collection. The
petitions to cancel and the notices of
opposition and appeal have filing fees.
There are no filing fees for the
extensions of time to file an opposition.
The additional papers that are filed in
ex parte and inter partes proceedings do
not have their own specific fees, so they
do not add new fees to the collection.
The filing fees for the petitions to
cancel, notices of opposition, and
notices of appeal are per class of goods
and services in the subject application
or registration; therefore the total filing
fees can vary depending on the number
of classes. The total filing fees of
$2,382,500 shown here are the
minimum fees associated with this
information collection.
Responses
(a)
Item
Petition to Cancel ............................................................................................................................
Electronic Petition to Cancel ...........................................................................................................
Notice of Opposition ........................................................................................................................
Electronic Notice of Opposition .......................................................................................................
Extension of Time to File an Opposition .........................................................................................
Electronic Request for Extension of Time to File an Opposition ....................................................
Papers in Inter Partes Cases ..........................................................................................................
• Answers
• Amendments to Pleadings
• Amendment of Application or Registration During Proceeding
• Motions (such as consent motions, motions to extend, motions to suspend, etc.)
• Evidence
• Briefs
• Surrender of Registration
• Abandonment of Application
• Documents Related to Concurrent Use Applications
• Notice of Intent to Appeal a TTAB decision
Electronic Papers in Inter Partes Cases .........................................................................................
• Answers
• Amendments to Pleadings
• Amendment of Application or Registration During Proceeding
• Motions (such as consent motions, motions to extend, motions to suspend, etc.)
• Evidence
• Briefs
• Surrender of Registration
• Abandonment of Application
• Documents Related to Concurrent Use Applications
• Notice of Intent to Appeal a TTAB Decision
Notice of Appeal (Ex parte) .............................................................................................................
Electronic Notice of Appeal (Ex parte) ............................................................................................
Miscellaneous Ex Parte Papers ......................................................................................................
Electronic Miscellaneous Ex Parte Papers .....................................................................................
Totals ........................................................................................................................................
The USPTO estimates that the total
non-hour respondent cost burden for
this collection, in the form of postage
and recordkeeping costs, in addition to
the filing fees, is $2,417,326 per year.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–15772 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Filing fee
($)
(b)
Total non-hour
cost burden
(a × b)
(c)
125
1,300
350
5,000
150
17,000
6,000
$300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$37,500.00
390,000.00
105,000.00
1,500,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
39,500
0.00
0.00
500
3,000
4,700
2,400
80,025
100.00
100.00
0.00
0.00
....................
50,000.00
300,000.00
0.00
0.00
2,382,500.00
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–945]
Notice of Antidumping Duty Order:
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the People’s Republic of
China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’),
the Department is issuing an
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
antidumping duty order on prestressed
concrete steel wire strand (‘‘PC strand’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). On June 22, 2010, the ITC
notified the Department of its
affirmative determination of material
injury to a U.S. industry. See
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
from China (Investigation Nos. 701–TA–
464 and 731–TA–1160 (Final), USITC
Publication 4162, June 2010).
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexis Polovina or Alan Ray, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3927 or (202) 482–
5403, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with sections 735(d)
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), the Department
published the final determination of
sales at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) in
the antidumping investigation of PC
strand from the PRC. See Prestressed
Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 75 FR 28560 (May 21, 2010)
(‘‘Final Determination’’).
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
Scope of the Order
The scope of this investigation
consists of PC strand, produced from
wire of non-stainless, non-galvanized
steel, which is suitable for use in
prestressed concrete (both pretensioned
and post-tensioned) applications. The
product definition encompasses covered
and uncovered strand and all types,
grades, and diameters of PC strand. PC
strand is normally sold in the United
States in sizes ranging from 0.25 inches
to 0.70 inches in diameter. PC strand
made from galvanized wire is only
excluded from the scope if the zinc and/
or zinc oxide coating meets or exceeds
the 0.40 oz./ft 2 standard set forth in
ASTM–A–475. The PC strand subject to
this investigation is currently
classifiable under subheadings
7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this
investigation is dispositive.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
In accordance with section
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) to suspend liquidation on all
entries of subject merchandise from the
PRC. We will also instruct CBP to
require cash deposits equal to the
estimated amount by which the normal
value exceeds the U.S. price as
indicated in the chart below. These
instructions suspending liquidation will
remain in effect until further notice.
Additionally, in the Final
Determination, the Department noted
that it has continued to find in PreStressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, 75 FR 28557 (May 21,
2010) (‘‘CVD Final’’), that the products
under investigation, exported and
produced by Xinhua Metal Products
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinhua Metal’’), benefitted
from an export subsidy. See Final
Determination, 75 FR at 28563.
Therefore, we will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit or posting of a
bond equal to the weighted-average
amount by which normal value exceeds
U.S. price for Xinhua Metal, as
indicated below, minus the amount
determined to constitute an export
subsidy.
With respect to Wuxi Jinyang Metal
Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘WJMP’’), the
voluntary respondent in this
proceeding, the Department did not
individually examine its exports of
merchandise under investigation in the
final determination for the companion
CVD investigation. As a result, WJMP is
captured under the ‘‘All Others’’ rate,
which is an average of the companies
examined in the CVD Final. Therefore,
we will instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit or posting of a bond equal to the
weighted-average amount by which
normal value exceeds U.S. price for
WJMP, as indicated below, minus the
amount determined to constitute an
export subsidy in the ‘‘All Others’’ rate.
With respect to Fasten Group Import
& Export Co. Ltd. (‘‘Fasten I&E’’), the
separate rate company, we note that the
rate applied in this proceeding as a
separate rate is derived from the
calculated rate received by Xinhua
Metal. Although Xinhua Metal received
export subsidies in the CVD Final,
because its export subsidy rate is higher
than the export subsidy rate calculated
for Fasten I&E in the CVD Final, we will
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit or
posting of a bond equal to the weightedaverage amount by which normal value
exceeds U.S. price for Xinhua Metal, as
indicated below, minus the amount
determined to constitute an export
subsidy for Fasten I&E.
Antidumping Duty Order
Antidumping Duty Order
On June 22, 2010, in accordance with
section 735(d) of the Act, the ITC
notified the Department of its final
determination, pursuant to section
735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of lessthan-fair-value imports of subject
merchandise from the PRC. Therefore,
in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of
the Act, the Department will direct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to assess, upon further instruction by
the Department, antidumping duties
equal to the amount by which the
normal value of the merchandise
exceeds the export price (or constructed
export price) of the merchandise for all
relevant entries of PC strand from the
PRC. These antidumping duties will be
assessed on unliquidated entries of PC
strand from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from the warehouse, for
consumption on or after December 23,
2009, the date on which the Department
published its Preliminary
Determination. See Prestressed Concrete
Steel Wire Strand From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 74 FR 68232 (December 23,
2009) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
Effective on the date of publication of
the ITC’s final affirmative injury
determination, CBP will require, at the
same time as importers would normally
deposit estimated duties on this
merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the
estimated weighted-average
antidumping duty margins as listed
below minus the amounts of export
subsidies determined in the companion
CVD investigation, as described above.
See section 735(c)(3) of the Act. The
‘‘PRC-wide’’ rate applies to all exporters
of subject merchandise not specifically
listed. The weighted-average dumping
margins are as follows:
Exporter
Producer
WJMP ...............................................
Xinhua Metal ....................................
WJMP .........................................................................................................
Xinhua Metal ...............................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37383
Weighted-Average Margin
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
42.97
175.94
37384
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
Exporter
Producer
Fasten I&E ........................................
Jiangyin Fasten Steel Products Co., Ltd.,
Jiangyin Walsin Steel Cable Co., Ltd.,
Jiangyin Hongyu Metal Products Co., Ltd.
.....................................................................................................................
PRC-wide Entity 1 .............................
Weighted-Average Margin
175.94
193.55
1 The
PRC-wide rate also applies to Tianjin Shengte, Silvery Dragon PC Steel Products Group Co., Ltd., and Liaonin TongDa Building Material
Industry Co., Ltd.
This notice constitutes the
antidumping duty order with respect to
PC strand from the PRC pursuant to
section 736(a) of the Act. Interested
parties may contact the Department’s
Central Records Unit, Room 1117 of the
main Commerce building, for copies of
an updated list of antidumping duty
orders currently in effect.
This order is published in accordance
with section 736(a) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.211.
Dated: June 24, 2010.
Paul Piquado,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–15912 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we
invite comments on the question of
whether instruments of equivalent
scientific value, for the purposes for
which the instruments shown below are
intended to be used, are being
manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR
301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations and
be postmarked on or before July 19,
2010. Address written comments to
Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room
3720, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Washington, DC 20230. Applications
may be examined between 8:30 a.m. and
5 p.m. at the U.S. Department of
Commerce in Room 3720.
Docket Number: 10–015. Applicant:
National Center for Toxicological
Research, U.S. Food & Drug
Administration, Department of Health
and Human Services, 3900 NCTR Road,
Jefferson, Arkansas 72079. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to identify and
image nanoscale materials that are being
tested at this FDA laboratory, and to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
detect these materials in biological
samples including tissue culture and
organs from animals. Justification for
Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category being produced in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: June 16,
2010.
Docket Number: 10–023. Applicant:
University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800886,
480 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville,
VA 22903. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: The instrument will be used to
study proteins, macromolecular
complexes, and viruses. The primary
goal of the research is to obtain
structural information for biological
specimens at as high a resolution as
possible. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category being produced
in the United States. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
June 15, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–029. Applicant:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700
South Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: This instrument will be
used to characterize different types of
nanosized materials. A key aspect of the
research focuses on understanding
different aspects of physical and
chemical behavior of individual
metallic, semiconducting and magnetic
nanosized materials and their assembled
structures. Justification for Duty-Free
Entry: There are no instruments of the
same general category being produced
in the United States. Application
accepted by Commissioner of Customs:
June 11, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–030. Applicant:
University of California, Davis, One
Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: Elionix Co., Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: This instrument will be
used to measure and quantify the
structural integrity, geometry, chemical
composition, and accuracy of nano
machining tools and machined
workpieces. The micro tools that will be
observed are made of poly-crystalline
diamond (PCD) or nano-crystalline
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
diamond (NCD) and the grain structure
before and after machining must be
carefully observed with extremely high
magnification. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of
the same general category being
produced in the United States.
Application accepted by Commissioner
of Customs: June 11, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–031. Applicant:
National Institutes of Health, 9000
Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: This instrument will be
used to study subcellular,
supramolecular or macromolecular
structures at a resolution approximately
1000-fold greater than that achieved
with the light microscope. Justification
for Duty-Free Entry: There are no
instruments of the same general
category being produced in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: June 10,
2010.
Docket Number: 10–032. Applicant:
Battelle Memorial Institute, 3335 Q
Avenue, Richland, WA 99354.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Netherlands. Intended Use: The
instrument will be used to study both
structural and chemical composition
information at the atomic scale.
Justification for Duty-Free Entry: There
are no instruments of the same general
category being produced in the United
States. Application accepted by
Commissioner of Customs: June 9, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–033. Applicant:
Massachusetts General Hospital, 114
16th St., Charlestown, MA 02120.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: This instrument will be
used for the study of materials such as
cultured cells (Hela, n2a, clonal striatal
cells, primary neurons), mouse brain,
isolated autophagosomes from cultured
cells, and exosomes from human brain.
The goals are to understand how
prenatal cocaine exposure alters
dopamine receptor signaling and GABA
neuron development in the mouse
telencephalon. Justification for DutyFree Entry: There are no instruments of
the same general category being
produced in the United States.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37382-37384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15912]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-945]
Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the People's Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the ``Department'') and the International Trade Commission
(``ITC''), the Department is issuing an
[[Page 37383]]
antidumping duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (``PC
strand'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). On June 22,
2010, the ITC notified the Department of its affirmative determination
of material injury to a U.S. industry. See Prestressed Concrete Steel
Wire Strand from China (Investigation Nos. 701-TA-464 and 731-TA-1160
(Final), USITC Publication 4162, June 2010).
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina or Alan Ray, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3927 or (202) 482-5403, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''), the Department published the final
determination of sales at less than fair value (``LTFV'') in the
antidumping investigation of PC strand from the PRC. See Prestressed
Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the People's Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 75 FR 28560 (May 21,
2010) (``Final Determination'').
Scope of the Order
The scope of this investigation consists of PC strand, produced
from wire of non-stainless, non-galvanized steel, which is suitable for
use in prestressed concrete (both pretensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and diameters of PC strand. PC strand is
normally sold in the United States in sizes ranging from 0.25 inches to
0.70 inches in diameter. PC strand made from galvanized wire is only
excluded from the scope if the zinc and/or zinc oxide coating meets or
exceeds the 0.40 oz./ft \2\ standard set forth in ASTM-A-475. The PC
strand subject to this investigation is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to suspend
liquidation on all entries of subject merchandise from the PRC. We will
also instruct CBP to require cash deposits equal to the estimated
amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price as indicated in
the chart below. These instructions suspending liquidation will remain
in effect until further notice.
Additionally, in the Final Determination, the Department noted that
it has continued to find in Pre-Stressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination, 75 FR 28557 (May 21, 2010) (``CVD Final''), that
the products under investigation, exported and produced by Xinhua Metal
Products Co., Ltd. (``Xinhua Metal''), benefitted from an export
subsidy. See Final Determination, 75 FR at 28563. Therefore, we will
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit or posting of a bond equal to
the weighted-average amount by which normal value exceeds U.S. price
for Xinhua Metal, as indicated below, minus the amount determined to
constitute an export subsidy.
With respect to Wuxi Jinyang Metal Products Co., Ltd. (``WJMP''),
the voluntary respondent in this proceeding, the Department did not
individually examine its exports of merchandise under investigation in
the final determination for the companion CVD investigation. As a
result, WJMP is captured under the ``All Others'' rate, which is an
average of the companies examined in the CVD Final. Therefore, we will
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit or posting of a bond equal to
the weighted-average amount by which normal value exceeds U.S. price
for WJMP, as indicated below, minus the amount determined to constitute
an export subsidy in the ``All Others'' rate.
With respect to Fasten Group Import & Export Co. Ltd. (``Fasten
I&E''), the separate rate company, we note that the rate applied in
this proceeding as a separate rate is derived from the calculated rate
received by Xinhua Metal. Although Xinhua Metal received export
subsidies in the CVD Final, because its export subsidy rate is higher
than the export subsidy rate calculated for Fasten I&E in the CVD
Final, we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit or posting of a
bond equal to the weighted-average amount by which normal value exceeds
U.S. price for Xinhua Metal, as indicated below, minus the amount
determined to constitute an export subsidy for Fasten I&E.
Antidumping Duty Order
Antidumping Duty Order
On June 22, 2010, in accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, the
ITC notified the Department of its final determination, pursuant to
section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act, that an industry in the United
States is materially injured by reason of less-than-fair-value imports
of subject merchandise from the PRC. Therefore, in accordance with
section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the Department will direct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess, upon further instruction by
the Department, antidumping duties equal to the amount by which the
normal value of the merchandise exceeds the export price (or
constructed export price) of the merchandise for all relevant entries
of PC strand from the PRC. These antidumping duties will be assessed on
unliquidated entries of PC strand from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from the warehouse, for consumption on or after December 23, 2009, the
date on which the Department published its Preliminary Determination.
See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the People's Republic
of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
74 FR 68232 (December 23, 2009) (``Preliminary Determination'').
Effective on the date of publication of the ITC's final affirmative
injury determination, CBP will require, at the same time as importers
would normally deposit estimated duties on this merchandise, a cash
deposit equal to the estimated weighted-average antidumping duty
margins as listed below minus the amounts of export subsidies
determined in the companion CVD investigation, as described above. See
section 735(c)(3) of the Act. The ``PRC-wide'' rate applies to all
exporters of subject merchandise not specifically listed. The weighted-
average dumping margins are as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter Producer Weighted-Average Margin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WJMP........................................... WJMP............................. 42.97
Xinhua Metal................................... Xinhua Metal..................... 175.94
[[Page 37384]]
Fasten I&E..................................... Jiangyin Fasten Steel Products 175.94
Co., Ltd.,
Jiangyin Walsin Steel Cable Co.,
Ltd.,.
Jiangyin Hongyu Metal Products
Co., Ltd..
PRC-wide Entity \1\............................ ................................. 193.55
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The PRC-wide rate also applies to Tianjin Shengte, Silvery Dragon PC Steel Products Group Co., Ltd., and
Liaonin TongDa Building Material Industry Co., Ltd.
This notice constitutes the antidumping duty order with respect to
PC strand from the PRC pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act.
Interested parties may contact the Department's Central Records Unit,
Room 1117 of the main Commerce building, for copies of an updated list
of antidumping duty orders currently in effect.
This order is published in accordance with section 736(a) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.211.
Dated: June 24, 2010.
Paul Piquado,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-15912 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P