Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 36632-36633 [2010-15216]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
36632
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
weighted–average dumping margin
exists for Trust Chem for the period
December 1, 2007 through November
30, 2008:
Margin
(percent)
Exporter
Trust Chem Co., Ltd. ..................
30.72
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries pursuant to
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act: (1) for subject merchandise
exported by Trust Chem, the cash
deposit rate will be 30.72 percent, as
listed above; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and non–
PRC exporters not listed above that have
separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter–specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRC–
wide rate of 241.32 percent; and (4) for
all non–PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter that supplied that non–PRC
exporter. The deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:02 Jun 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under the APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
We are issuing and publishing the
final results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: June 21, 2010.
Paul Piquado,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I – List of Issues Addressed
in the Accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum
Comment 1. Basis of the Surrogate
Financial Ratios
Comment 2. Inclusion of Directors’
Salaries and Benefits in SG&A
Comment 3. Surrogate Values for Raw
Material Inputs
Comment 4. Surrogate Value for Nitric
Acid
Comment 5. Surrogate Value for
Chloranil
Comment 6. Surrogate Value for
Benzene Sulfonyl Chloride
[FR Doc. 2010–15638 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–900
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China:
Initiation of Antidumping Duty New
Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 28, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
request for a new shipper review
(‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order
on diamond sawblades and parts thereof
(‘‘diamond sawblades’’) from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’),
received on April 30, 2010, meets the
statutory and regulatory requirements
for initiation. The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) for the NSR is January 23, 2009,
through April 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–5403.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice announcing the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC was published
in the Federal Register on November 4,
2009. See Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof From the People’s
Republic of China and the Republic of
Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR
57145 (November 4, 2009)
(‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’). On April
30, 2010, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (‘‘Act’’), the Department
received a NSR request from Pujiang
Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
(‘‘PTDT’’). PTDT’s request was properly
made on April 30, 2010, May being the
semi–annual anniversary of the
Antidumping Duty Order. PTDT
certified that it is both the producer and
exporter of the subject merchandise
upon which the request was based.
PTDT also submitted a public version of
its request, which adequately
summarized proprietary information
and provided explanations as to why
certain proprietary information is not
capable of summarization.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i),
PTDT certified that it did not export
subject merchandise to the United
States during the period of investigation
(‘‘POI’’). In addition, pursuant to section
751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), PTDT certified
that, since the initiation of the
investigation, it has never been affiliated
with any PRC exporter or producer who
exported subject merchandise to the
United States during the POI, including
those respondents not individually
examined during the investigation. As
required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B),
PTDT also certified that its export
activities were not controlled by the
central government of the PRC.
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices
In addition to the certifications
described above, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iv)(A), (B), and (C), PTDT
submitted documentation establishing
the following: (1) the date on which
PTDT first shipped subject merchandise
for export to the United States; (2) the
volume of its first shipment; and (3) the
date of its first sale to an unaffiliated
customer in the United States.
The Department conducted U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
database queries in an attempt to
confirm that PTDT’s shipments of
subject merchandise had entered the
United States for consumption and that
liquidation of such entries had been
properly suspended for antidumping
duties.1 The Department also examined
whether the CBP data confirmed that
such entries were made during the NSR
POR. The information we examined was
consistent with that provided by PTDT.
Initiation of New Shipper Review
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), we find
that the request submitted by PTDT
meets the threshold requirements for
initiation of a new shipper review for
shipments of diamond sawblades from
the PRC produced and exported by
PTDT. See ‘‘Memorandum to the File
From Alan Ray, Case Analyst, New
Shipper Initiation Checklist: Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China and the
Republic of Korea (A–570–900),’’ dated
concurrently with this notice. The POR
is January 23, 2009, through April 30,
2010. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B).
The Department intends to issue the
preliminary results of this NSR no later
than 180 days from the date of
initiation, and the final results no later
than 270 days from the date of
initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Act.
It is the Department’s usual practice,
in cases involving non–market
economies, to require that a company
seeking to establish eligibility for an
1 The Department only resumed the suspension of
liquidation of sawblades and parts on January 23,
2009, as prior to that date, no order was in place
because the ITC found in its final determination
that domestic parties had not suffered from the
importation of diamond sawblades from the PRC.
As such, without an order in place, CBP had no
authority to suspend the liquidation of entries. On
August 30, 2009, the CIT ordered the Department
to issue the order, and it was effective retroactive
to January 23, 2009. See Antidumping Duty Order.
The deposit rates that CBP collected for entries after
January 23, 2009, were the antidumping duty rates
from the Final Determination. See Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 71 FR
29303, (May 22, 2006) (‘‘Final Determination’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:02 Jun 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
antidumping duty rate separate from the
country–wide rate provide evidence of
de jure and de facto absence of
government control over the company’s
export activities. Accordingly, we will
issue questionnaires to PTDT, which
will include a section requesting
information with regard to PTDT’s
export activities for separate rates
purposes. The review will proceed if the
response provides sufficient indication
that PTDT is not subject to either de jure
or de facto government control with
respect to its exports of subject
merchandise.
We will instruct CBP to allow, at the
option of the importer, the posting, until
the completion of the review, of a bond
or security in lieu of a cash deposit for
each entry of the subject merchandise
from PTDT in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(e). Because PTDT certified that
it both produced and exported the
subject merchandise, the sale of which
is the basis for this new shipper review
request, we will apply the bonding
privilege to PTDT only for subject
merchandise which PTDT both
produced and exported.
Interested parties requiring access to
proprietary information in this NSR
should submit applications for
disclosure under administrative
protective order in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305 and 351.306. This
initiation and notice are in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: June 17, 2010.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–15216 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
International Trade Administration
Cybersecurity and Innovation in the
Information Economy
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
and Technology, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration, and International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36633
SUMMARY: The National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA), and
the International Trade Administration
(ITA), on behalf of the U.S. Department
of Commerce (Department), will hold a
public meeting on July 27, 2010, to
discuss the relationship between
cybersecurity in the commercial space
and innovation in the Internet economy.
DATES: The meeting will be held on July
27, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
Eastern Daylight Time. Registration will
begin at 8:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the Amphitheater of the Ronald Reagan
Building and International Trade
Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20006. All major
entrances to the building are accessible
to people with disabilities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information regarding the
meeting, contact W. Curt Barker by email at william.barker@nist.gov or by
phone at (202) 482–0935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Recognizing the vital importance of the
Internet to U.S. economic growth and
innovation, the Department has made it
a top priority to ensure that the Internet
remains a vehicle for these important
purposes. The Department has
assembled an Internet Policy Task Force
(Task Force), comprised of Department
officials, whose mission is to identify
leading public policy and operational
challenges in the Internet environment.
The Task Force leverages expertise
across many bureaus, including those
responsible for domestic and
international information and
communications policy, international
trade, cybersecurity standards and best
practices, intellectual property, business
advocacy and export control.
As part of the Task Force agenda,
NIST, NTIA, and ITA are conducting a
comprehensive review of cybersecurity
and innovation in the Internet economy,
with a particular emphasis on the
security practices of those businesses
that operate non-critical infrastructure.
To facilitate this review, on July 27,
2010, NIST, NTIA, and ITA will hold a
public meeting to discuss stakeholder
views and to encourage public
discussion of cybersecurity policy in the
United States. The event will seek
participation and comment from all
interested stakeholders, including the
commercial, academic, and civil society
sectors, on the impact of current
cybersecurity law and governmental
policy, the common and emerging
techniques used in successful
cybersecurity strategies, and the relative
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 123 (Monday, June 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36632-36633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15216]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-900
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of
China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 28, 2010.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has determined
that a request for a new shipper review (``NSR'') of the antidumping
duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (``diamond
sawblades'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), received on
April 30, 2010, meets the statutory and regulatory requirements for
initiation. The period of review (``POR'') for the NSR is January 23,
2009, through April 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Ray, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-5403.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice announcing the antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades from the PRC was published in the Federal Register on
November 4, 2009. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the
People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty
Orders, 74 FR 57145 (November 4, 2009) (``Antidumping Duty Order''). On
April 30, 2010, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (``Act''), the Department received a NSR request
from Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. (``PTDT''). PTDT's request
was properly made on April 30, 2010, May being the semi-annual
anniversary of the Antidumping Duty Order. PTDT certified that it is
both the producer and exporter of the subject merchandise upon which
the request was based. PTDT also submitted a public version of its
request, which adequately summarized proprietary information and
provided explanations as to why certain proprietary information is not
capable of summarization.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(i), PTDT certified that it did not export subject
merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation
(``POI''). In addition, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), PTDT certified that, since the
initiation of the investigation, it has never been affiliated with any
PRC exporter or producer who exported subject merchandise to the United
States during the POI, including those respondents not individually
examined during the investigation. As required by 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), PTDT also certified that its export activities
were not controlled by the central government of the PRC.
[[Page 36633]]
In addition to the certifications described above, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv)(A), (B), and (C), PTDT submitted documentation
establishing the following: (1) the date on which PTDT first shipped
subject merchandise for export to the United States; (2) the volume of
its first shipment; and (3) the date of its first sale to an
unaffiliated customer in the United States.
The Department conducted U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') database queries in an attempt to confirm that PTDT's
shipments of subject merchandise had entered the United States for
consumption and that liquidation of such entries had been properly
suspended for antidumping duties.\1\ The Department also examined
whether the CBP data confirmed that such entries were made during the
NSR POR. The information we examined was consistent with that provided
by PTDT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department only resumed the suspension of liquidation of
sawblades and parts on January 23, 2009, as prior to that date, no
order was in place because the ITC found in its final determination
that domestic parties had not suffered from the importation of
diamond sawblades from the PRC. As such, without an order in place,
CBP had no authority to suspend the liquidation of entries. On
August 30, 2009, the CIT ordered the Department to issue the order,
and it was effective retroactive to January 23, 2009. See
Antidumping Duty Order. The deposit rates that CBP collected for
entries after January 23, 2009, were the antidumping duty rates from
the Final Determination. See Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China, 71 FR 29303, (May 22, 2006) (``Final
Determination'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of New Shipper Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(d)(1), we find that the request submitted by PTDT meets the
threshold requirements for initiation of a new shipper review for
shipments of diamond sawblades from the PRC produced and exported by
PTDT. See ``Memorandum to the File From Alan Ray, Case Analyst, New
Shipper Initiation Checklist: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From
the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea (A-570-900),''
dated concurrently with this notice. The POR is January 23, 2009,
through April 30, 2010. See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B). The Department
intends to issue the preliminary results of this NSR no later than 180
days from the date of initiation, and the final results no later than
270 days from the date of initiation. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of
the Act.
It is the Department's usual practice, in cases involving non-
market economies, to require that a company seeking to establish
eligibility for an antidumping duty rate separate from the country-wide
rate provide evidence of de jure and de facto absence of government
control over the company's export activities. Accordingly, we will
issue questionnaires to PTDT, which will include a section requesting
information with regard to PTDT's export activities for separate rates
purposes. The review will proceed if the response provides sufficient
indication that PTDT is not subject to either de jure or de facto
government control with respect to its exports of subject merchandise.
We will instruct CBP to allow, at the option of the importer, the
posting, until the completion of the review, of a bond or security in
lieu of a cash deposit for each entry of the subject merchandise from
PTDT in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(e). Because PTDT certified that it both produced and exported
the subject merchandise, the sale of which is the basis for this new
shipper review request, we will apply the bonding privilege to PTDT
only for subject merchandise which PTDT both produced and exported.
Interested parties requiring access to proprietary information in
this NSR should submit applications for disclosure under administrative
protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and 351.306. This
initiation and notice are in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: June 17, 2010.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-15216 Filed 6-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
