Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to FLEX Equity Options, 36456-36458 [2010-15360]
Download as PDF
36456
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Syntech
International, Inc. (n/k/a Avalon
Technology Group, Inc.) because it has
not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended September 30, 1994.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies
is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. e.d.t. on June 23, 2010, through
11:59 p.m. e.d.t. on July 7, 2010.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–15585 Filed 6–23–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
Channel America Television Network,
Inc., EquiMed, Inc., Kore Holdings, Inc.,
Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. (n/k/a
Acuity Cimatrix, Inc.), Security
Investments Group, Inc., Shared
Technologies Cellular, Inc., Shimoda
Resources Holdings, Inc., Tri Star
Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Silver Star Foods,
Inc.), and V–One Corp.; Order of
Suspension of Trading
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
June 23, 2010.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Channel
America Television Network, Inc.
because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
December 31, 1994.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of EquiMed,
Inc. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended
September 30, 1997.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Kore
Holdings, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended September 30, 2005.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Robotic
Vision Systems, Inc. (n/k/a Acuity
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Cimatrix, Inc.) because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period
ended June 30, 2004.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Security
Investments Group, Inc. because it has
not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended September 30, 1995.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Shared
Technologies Cellular, Inc. because it
has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2001.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Shimoda
Resources Holdings, Inc. because it has
not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended August 31, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Tri Star
Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a Silver Star Foods,
Inc.) because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
December 31, 2003.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of V–One
Corp. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended
September 30, 2004.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of the above-listed
companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the
period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 23,
2010, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on July 7,
2010.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–15586 Filed 6–23–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
PO 00000
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–62325; File No. SR–Phlx–
2010–85]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
FLEX Equity Options
June 18, 2010.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)1, and rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 15,
2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to assess a
transaction charge for members trading
Flexible Exchange® Options (‘‘FLEX
Options’’).3
While changes to the Exchange’s Fee
Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has
designated this proposal to be effective
for trades settling on or after June 30,
2010.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaqtrader.com/
micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 A FLEX option is a customized option that
provides parties to the transaction with the ability
to fix terms including the exercise style, expiration
date, and certain exercise prices. See Exchange Rule
1079. FLEX Options are a trademark of the Chicago
Board Options Exchange.
2 17
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
25JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to establish a new fee for
equity options transactions executed
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1079 (‘‘FLEX
equity options’’). The Exchange believes
that the proposed fee reduction for
trading FLEX equity options will
encourage members to trade additional
FLEX equity options contracts on the
Exchange, resulting in additional order
flow to the Exchange. Currently, the fees
which members are assessed when
trading FLEX equity options are the
standard equity option fees.
Currently, members who trade FLEX
equity options are assessed the standard
equity options fees delineated in
Section II of the Fee Schedule. The
Exchange is proposing to reduce
transaction fees to $0.10 per contract
side for FLEX equity options for all
participants, except Customers.4
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
assess a $.10 transaction charge on
Professionals 5, Specialists 6, Registered
Options Traders 7, Streaming Quote
Traders (‘‘SQT’’) 8, Remote Streaming
Quote Traders (‘‘RSQT’’) 9, Broker4 At this time the Exchange is not proposing to
otherwise amend its equity option fees.
5 Rule 1000(b)(14) provides in relevant part: ‘‘The
term ‘‘professional’’ means any person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii)
places more than 390 orders in listed options per
day on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s).
6 A Specialist is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options specialist pursuant to rule
1020(a).
7 A Registered Option Trader is defined in
Exchange Rule 1014(b) as a regular member or a
foreign currency options participant of the
Exchange located on the trading floor who has
received permission from the Exchange to trade in
options for his own account. A ROT includes a
SQT, a RSQT and a Non-SQT, which by definition
is neither a SQT or a RSQT. See Exchange Rule
1014 (b)(i) and (ii).
8 An SQT is an Exchange Registered Options
Trader (‘‘ROT’’) who has received permission from
the Exchange to generate and submit option
quotations electronically through an electronic
interface with AUTOM via an Exchange approved
proprietary electronic quoting device in eligible
options to which such SQT is assigned. See
Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
9 An RSQT is an ROT that is a member or member
organization with no physical trading floor
presence who has received permission from the
Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically through AUTOM in eligible options
to which such RSQT has been assigned. An RSQT
may only submit such quotations electronically
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dealers and Firms. Customers would
continue to remain free in FLEX equity
options as they currently are in equity
option products.
The Exchange currently waives the
Firm equity options transaction fees for
members executing facilitation orders
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1064 when
such members are trading in their own
proprietary account.10 Similar to the
equity option fees, which are currently
subject to the aforementioned waiver,
the Exchange would continue to apply
the waiver to members executing
facilitation orders pursuant to Exchange
Rule 1064 to FLEX equity option
transactions.
While changes to the Exchange’s Fee
Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has
designated this proposal to be effective
for trades settling on or after June 30,
2010.
2. Statutory Basis.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is
consistent with section 6(b) of the Act 11
in general, and furthers the objectives of
section 6(b)(4) of the Act 12 in particular,
in that it is an equitable allocation of
reasonable fees and other charges among
Exchange members. The Exchange
believes that the proposed fees for FLEX
options are equitable and reasonable
because all participants will equally be
assessed $.10 per contract and
Customers will continue to remain free
for equity options transactions executed
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1079.
Additionally, the Exchange’s proposal
to extend the current waiver for
members executing facilitation orders
pursuant to Exchange Rule 1064 to
FLEX equity options is reasonable and
equitable because it would continue to
allow members the benefit of a waiver
they receive today.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
from off the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(B).
10 The waiver does not apply to orders where a
member is acting as agent on behalf of a nonmember. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
60477 (August 11, 2009), 74 FR 41777 (August 18,
2009) (SR–Phlx-2009–67).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36457
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 13 and
paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 14
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx-2010–85 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx-2010–85. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
13 15
14 17
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
25JNN1
36458
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx2010–85 and should be submitted on or
before July 16, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–15360 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–62316; File No. SR–ISE–
2010–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2, Related to the Price
Improvement Mechanism
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
June 17, 2010.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 28,
2010, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change, as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
On June 10, 2010, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. On June 17, 2010, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed
rule change.3 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 2 replaces and supersedes the
original filing and Amendment No. 1 thereto in
their entirety.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:23 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and
2, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 723 to allow Crossing Transactions
to be entered into the Price
Improvement Mechanism (‘‘PIM’’) at a
price that matches the ISE BBO in
certain circumstances. The text of the
proposed rule change is as follows
(deletions are in [brackets]; additions
are in italics):
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 723. Price Improvement
Mechanism for Crossing Transactions
(a) No change.
(b) Crossing Transaction Entry. A
Crossing Transaction is comprised of
the order the Electronic Access Member
represents as agent (the ‘‘Agency Order’’)
and a counter-side order for the full size
of the Agency Order (the ‘‘Counter-Side
Order’’). The Counter-Side Order may
represent interest for the Member’s own
account, or interest the Member has
solicited from one or more other parties,
or a combination of both.
(1) Except as provided in
Supplementary Material.08 below, [A] a
Crossing Transaction must be entered
only at a price that is better than the ISE
best bid or offer (‘‘ISE BBO’’) and equal
to or better than the national best bid or
offer (‘‘NBBO’’).
(2) and (3) no change.
(c) and (d) no change.
Supplementary Material to Rule 723
.01 through .07 no change.
.08 When the ISE BBO is equal to the
NBBO, a Crossing Transaction may be
entered where the price of the Crossing
Transaction is equal to the ISE BBO if
the Agency Order is on the opposite side
of the market from the ISE BBO. In this
case, the Agency Order will be
automatically executed against the ISE
BBO. If the Agency Order is not fully
executed after the ISE BBO is fully
exhausted and is no longer at a price
equal to the Crossing Transaction, the
PIM will be initiated for the balance of
the order as provided in Rule 723. With
respect to any portion of an Agency
Order that is automatically executed
against the ISE BBO pursuant to this
paragraph .08, the exposure
requirements contained in Rule 717(d)
and (e) will not be satisfied for the fact
that the member utilized the Price
Improvement Mechanism.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 811. Directed Orders
(a) through (d) no change.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(e) Except as provided in this
paragraph (e), when a Directed Order is
released, the System processes the order
in the same manner as any other order
received by the Exchange. Directed
Orders will not be automatically
executed at a price that is inferior to the
NBBO and, except as provided in
subparagraph (e)(3), will be handled
pursuant to Rule 803(c)(2) when the ISE
best bid or offer is inferior to the NBBO.
(1) A marketable Directed Order that
is released, or entered into the PIM
pursuant to Supplemental Material .08
to Rule 723, will be matched against
orders and quotes according to Rule 713
except that, at any given price level, the
Directed Market Maker will be last in
priority.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
PIM is a process by which a member
can provide price improvement
opportunities for a transaction wherein
the member seeks to execute an agency
order as principal or execute an agency
order against a solicited order (a
Crossing Transaction’’).4 Currently
under Rule 723, a Crossing Transaction
may only be entered at a price that is
better than the ISE best bid or offer (‘‘ISE
BBO’’) and equal to or better than the
national best bid or offer (‘‘NBBO’’).
The Exchange proposes to modify
PIM so that members may enter
transactions at a price that matches the
ISE BBO and the NBBO if the agency
order is on the opposite side of the
market from the ISE BBO. In this case,
the agency order will be automatically
executed against the ISE BBO in the
same manner as marketable orders
entered directly. If the agency order is
not fully executed after the ISE BBO is
4 ISE
E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM
Rule 723(a).
25JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36456-36458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15360]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-62325; File No. SR-Phlx-2010-85]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
to FLEX Equity Options
June 18, 2010.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\, and rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 15, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to assess a transaction charge for members
trading Flexible Exchange[reg] Options (``FLEX Options'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A FLEX option is a customized option that provides parties
to the transaction with the ability to fix terms including the
exercise style, expiration date, and certain exercise prices. See
Exchange Rule 1079. FLEX Options are a trademark of the Chicago
Board Options Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While changes to the Exchange's Fee Schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective for trades settling on or after June 30, 2010.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at https://nasdaqtrader.com/micro.aspx?id=PHLXfilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference
Room, and on the Commission's Web site at https://www.sec.gov.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The
[[Page 36457]]
Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose.
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish a new fee
for equity options transactions executed pursuant to Exchange Rule 1079
(``FLEX equity options''). The Exchange believes that the proposed fee
reduction for trading FLEX equity options will encourage members to
trade additional FLEX equity options contracts on the Exchange,
resulting in additional order flow to the Exchange. Currently, the fees
which members are assessed when trading FLEX equity options are the
standard equity option fees.
Currently, members who trade FLEX equity options are assessed the
standard equity options fees delineated in Section II of the Fee
Schedule. The Exchange is proposing to reduce transaction fees to $0.10
per contract side for FLEX equity options for all participants, except
Customers.\4\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to assess a $.10
transaction charge on Professionals \5\, Specialists \6\, Registered
Options Traders \7\, Streaming Quote Traders (``SQT'') \8\, Remote
Streaming Quote Traders (``RSQT'') \9\, Broker-Dealers and Firms.
Customers would continue to remain free in FLEX equity options as they
currently are in equity option products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ At this time the Exchange is not proposing to otherwise
amend its equity option fees.
\5\ Rule 1000(b)(14) provides in relevant part: ``The term
``professional'' means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker
or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390 orders in
listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s).
\6\ A Specialist is an Exchange member who is registered as an
options specialist pursuant to rule 1020(a).
\7\ A Registered Option Trader is defined in Exchange Rule
1014(b) as a regular member or a foreign currency options
participant of the Exchange located on the trading floor who has
received permission from the Exchange to trade in options for his
own account. A ROT includes a SQT, a RSQT and a Non-SQT, which by
definition is neither a SQT or a RSQT. See Exchange Rule 1014 (b)(i)
and (ii).
\8\ An SQT is an Exchange Registered Options Trader (``ROT'')
who has received permission from the Exchange to generate and submit
option quotations electronically through an electronic interface
with AUTOM via an Exchange approved proprietary electronic quoting
device in eligible options to which such SQT is assigned. See
Exchange Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A).
\9\ An RSQT is an ROT that is a member or member organization
with no physical trading floor presence who has received permission
from the Exchange to generate and submit option quotations
electronically through AUTOM in eligible options to which such RSQT
has been assigned. An RSQT may only submit such quotations
electronically from off the floor of the Exchange. See Exchange Rule
1014(b)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange currently waives the Firm equity options transaction
fees for members executing facilitation orders pursuant to Exchange
Rule 1064 when such members are trading in their own proprietary
account.\10\ Similar to the equity option fees, which are currently
subject to the aforementioned waiver, the Exchange would continue to
apply the waiver to members executing facilitation orders pursuant to
Exchange Rule 1064 to FLEX equity option transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The waiver does not apply to orders where a member is
acting as agent on behalf of a non-member. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 60477 (August 11, 2009), 74 FR 41777 (August 18,
2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While changes to the Exchange's Fee Schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective for trades settling on or after June 30, 2010.
2. Statutory Basis.
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act \11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act \12\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members. The Exchange believes that
the proposed fees for FLEX options are equitable and reasonable because
all participants will equally be assessed $.10 per contract and
Customers will continue to remain free for equity options transactions
executed pursuant to Exchange Rule 1079.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange's proposal to extend the current waiver
for members executing facilitation orders pursuant to Exchange Rule
1064 to FLEX equity options is reasonable and equitable because it
would continue to allow members the benefit of a waiver they receive
today.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \13\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \14\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2010-85 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-85. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than
[[Page 36458]]
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2010-85 and should be
submitted on or before July 16, 2010.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-15360 Filed 6-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P