Injury and Illness Prevention Program, 35360-35362 [2010-15041]
Download as PDF
35360
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(2) Within 1,000 flight cycles after the last
inspection done in accordance with
paragraph (l) of this AD or 500 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Post-Repair Inspection for External Doubler
Repair
29 CFR Part 1910
(o) For all airplanes: Do an internal surface
HFEC inspection for cracking of the skin at
any external doubler repairs greater than 40
inches in length (in the horizontal direction)
within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective
date of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–53–2307, Revision 3,
dated April 16, 2009. Thereafter, perform that
inspection at intervals not to exceed 3,000
flight cycles.
(p) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (o) of this
AD, repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Service Bulletin 747–53–2307, Revision 3,
dated April 16, 2009.
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(q)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Ivan
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch,
ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6437; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, email information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACOAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 90–15–06, Amendment
39–6653; and AD 94–12–09, Amendment 39–
8937; are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 16,
2010.
Robert D. Breneman,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–15054 Filed 6–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of additional stakeholder
meetings.
OSHA invites interested
parties to participate in two stakeholder
meetings on Injury and Illness
Prevention Programs, in addition to
those meetings announced on May 4,
2010. OSHA recently conducted two
stakeholder meetings in East Brunswick,
NJ, on June 3, 2010, and in Dallas, TX,
on June 10, 2010. OSHA has closed
registration on a third meeting in
Washington, DC, to be held on June 29,
2010. More stakeholders expressed
interest in participating in the
Washington, DC meeting than could be
accommodated. Therefore, OSHA is
issuing this notice to announce an
additional meeting in Washington, DC,
as well as a meeting in Sacramento, CA.
OSHA plans to use the information
gathered at these meetings in
developing an Injury and Illness
Prevention Program proposed rule. The
discussions will be informal and will
provide the Agency with the necessary
information to develop a rule that will
help employers reduce workplace
injuries and illnesses through a
systematic process that proactively
addresses workplace safety and health
hazards.
SUMMARY:
Dates and locations for the
stakeholder meetings are:
• July 20, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., in Washington, DC.
• August 3, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., in Sacramento, CA.
The deadlines for confirmed registration
at each meeting are July 6, 2010 and July
20, 2010 respectively.
ADDRESSES:
DATES:
I. Registration
Submit your notice of intent to
participate in one of the scheduled
meetings by one of the following
methods:
• Electronic. Register at https://
www2.ergweb.com/projects/
conferences/osha/register-oshaI2P2.htm (follow the instructions
online).
• Facsimile. Fax your request to:
(781) 674–2906, and label it ‘‘Attention:
OSHA Injury and Illness Prevention
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Program Stakeholder Meeting
Registration.’’
• Regular mail, express delivery,
hand (courier) delivery, and messenger
service.
Send your request to: Eastern Research
Group, Inc., 110 Hartwell Avenue,
Lexington, MA 02421; Attention: OSHA
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
Stakeholder Meeting Registration.
II. Meetings
Specific information on the location
of each meeting can be found on the
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
Web site at https://www2.ergweb.com/
projects/conferences/osha/register-oshaI2P2.htm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
• Press inquiries. Contact Jennifer
Ashley, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, Room N–3647, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone: (202) 693–1999.
• General and technical information.
Contact Michael Seymour, OSHA
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
Room N–3718, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202)
693–1950.
• Copies of this Federal Register
notice. Electronic copies are available at
https://www.regulations.gov. This
Federal Register notice, as well as news
releases and other relevant information,
also are available on the OSHA Web
page at https://www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Over the past 30 years, the
occupational safety and health
community has used various names to
describe systematic approaches to
reducing injuries and illnesses in the
workplace. OSHA has voluntary Safety
and Health Management Program
guidelines, consensus and international
standards use the term ‘‘Safety and
Health Management Systems,’’ and
OSHA’s State plan States use terms such
as ‘‘Injury and Illness Prevention
Programs’’ and ‘‘Accident Prevention
Programs.’’ In this notice, OSHA uses
the term ‘‘Injury and Illness Prevention
Programs.’’ Regardless of the title, the
common goal of these approaches is to
help employers reduce workplace
injuries and illnesses through a
systematic process that proactively
addresses workplace safety and health
hazards.
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
OSHA’s History With Safety and Health
Programs
The Occupational Safety and Health
Act (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) (the Act) in
Section 17, paragraph (j), provides the
Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission (OSHRC) the authority to
assess civil penalties giving due
consideration to the good faith of the
employer. Based on this paragraph of
the Act, OSHA developed a policy of
reducing penalties for employers who
have violated OSHA standards but who
have demonstrated a good faith effort to
provide a safe and healthy workplace to
their employees. The Agency has long
recognized the implementation of a
safety and health program as a way of
demonstrating good faith. Similarly, in
its first decision, the OSHRC held that
good faith compliance efforts are gauged
primarily by the presence of effective
safety and health programs (Nacirema
Operating Co., 1 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1001
(Rev. Comm’n 1972)).
Over the years, OSHA established a
number of initiatives to encourage
employers to develop and implement
employee safety and health programs.
OSHA’s Small Business Consultation
Program, which offers small businesses
with exemplary safety and health
programs an opportunity for recognition
under their Safety and Health
Achievement Recognition Program
(SHARP) and the Agency’s Voluntary
Protection Programs (VPP) are two
examples of such initiatives. The
Agency established the VPP to recognize
companies in the private sector with
outstanding records in the area of
employee safety and health. It became
apparent that many of these worksites,
which had higher levels of compliance,
fewer serious hazards, and injury and
illness rates markedly below industry
averages, were relying on safety and
health programs to produce these
results.
Based on the growing support for
safety and health programs, OSHA
issued the Safety and Health Program
Management Guidelines in 1989 (54 FR
3908). These guidelines reflect the best
management practices of successful
companies and encourage employers to
institute and maintain a program which
provides systematic policies,
procedures, and practices that are
adequate to recognize and protect their
employees from occupational safety and
health hazards. The guidelines identify
four major elements of an effective
program: management commitment and
employee involvement; worksite
analysis; hazard prevention and
controls; and safety and health training.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
OSHA’s Previous Rulemaking Effort
In October of 1995, OSHA held the
first series of stakeholder meetings to
discuss preliminary ideas for a Safety
and Health Program rule and the
significant issues raised by such a rule.
Many small businesses and
organizations representing small
businesses attended the stakeholder
meetings. Staff members from the Office
of Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) were also present
at the stakeholder meetings. In all,
OSHA interacted with hundreds of
stakeholders, including employers,
employees, employee representatives,
trade associations, State and local
government personnel, safety and health
professionals, Advisory Committees,
and other interested parties.
In 1998, OSHA developed a draft
proposed rule that required employers
in general industry and maritime
workplaces to establish safety and
health programs. The program in the
draft proposed rule had five core
elements, including: Management
leadership and employee participation;
hazard identification and assessment;
hazard prevention and control;
information and training; and
evaluation of the program’s
effectiveness. In developing the draft
proposed rule, OSHA worked
extensively with stakeholders from
labor, industry, safety and health
organizations, State governments, trade
associations, insurance companies, and
small businesses.
On October 20, 1998, OSHA convened
a Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
Panel for the draft Safety and Health
Program proposed rule. The Panel
provided small entity representatives
(SERs) with initial drafts of the rule, a
summary of the rule, the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, a
summary of the benefits and costs of the
rule as it affected firms in the small
entity representative’s industry, OSHA’s
draft enforcement policy for the rule,
and a list of issues of interest to panel
members.
The SBREFA Panel held
teleconferences and received written
comments from the SERs. The
comments, and the Panel’s responses to
them, formed the principal basis for the
Panel’s report. The Panel’s report
provided background information on
the draft proposed rule and the types of
small entities that would be subject to
the proposed rule, described the Panel’s
efforts to obtain the advice and
recommendations of representatives of
those small entities, summarized the
comments received from those
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35361
representatives, and presented the
findings and recommendations of the
Panel.
A proposed Safety and Health
Program rule was never published, and
the rulemaking effort was removed from
the Regulatory Agenda on August 15,
2002. However, the effort in the 1990s
showed the interest of OSHA, the States,
employers, employees, OSHA’s advisory
committees, and others in a systematic
process that proactively addresses
workplace safety and health hazards. It
demonstrated that OSHA was not alone
in believing that these processes work to
save lives and to prevent injuries and
illnesses in the workplace.
Safety and Health Management System
Consensus Standards
Recently, consensus standards have
been developed that address safety and
health management systems. The
American Industrial Hygiene
Association published a voluntary
consensus standard, ANSI/AIHA Z10—
2005 Occupational Safety and Health
Management Systems, based on the
‘‘Plan-Do-Check-Act’’ cycle. The Z10
standard places an emphasis on
continual improvement and
systematically eliminating the
underlying root cause of hazards. In
addition, the Occupational Health and
Safety Assessment Series (OHSAS)
Project Group, which is an international
association of government agencies,
private industries, and consulting
organizations, developed OHSAS
18001—2007 Occupational Health and
Safety Management Systems in response
to customer demand for a recognized
occupational health and safety
management system standard against
which their management systems could
be assessed and certified. The OHSAS
18001 is published by the British
Standards Institute.
II. Stakeholder Meetings
OSHA conducted stakeholder
meetings in East Brunswick, NJ, on June
3, 2010, and in Dallas, TX, on June 10,
2010, announced in the Federal
Register on May 4, 2010, at 75 FR
23637) . A third meeting will be held in
Washington, DC, on June 29, 2010. Due
to high demand for participation in the
first three meetings, and to provide an
opportunity for those unable to attend
one of the prior meetings, OSHA has
decided to conduct additional
stakeholder meetings in Washington,
DC, and Sacramento, CA.
The stakeholder meetings will
provide OSHA with current information
and views from a wide range of
interests. The meetings will be
conducted as a group discussion. To
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
35362
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
facilitate as much group interaction as
possible, formal presentations will not
be permitted. OSHA believes the
stakeholder meeting discussion should
center on major issues such as:
• Possible regulatory approaches
•Scope and application of a rule
—Covered industries
—Covered employers (size, high/low
injury rates)
—Covered hazards
—Relationship to existing OSHA
requirements
•Organization of a rule
—Regulatory text
—Mandatory or voluntary appendices
—Other standards incorporated by
reference
• The role of consensus standards
• Economic impacts
• Any additional topics as time
permits
In addition, OSHA is interested in
receiving feedback on the following
specific questions:
• In light of the ANSI Z10 standard,
the OHSAS 18001 standard, and
OSHA’s 1989 guidelines, what are the
advantages and disadvantages of
addressing through rulemaking a
systematic process that proactively
addresses workplace safety and health
hazards?
• Based on OSHA’s experience, the
Agency believes that an Injury and
Illness Prevention Program rule would
include the following elements:
1. Management duties (including
items such as establishing a policy,
setting goals, planning and allocating
resources, and assigning and
communicating roles and
responsibilities);
2. Employee participation (including
items such as involving employees in
establishing, maintaining and evaluating
the program, employee access to safety
and health information, and employee
role in incident investigations);
3. Hazard identification and
assessment (including items such as
what hazards must be identified,
information gathering, workplace
inspections, incident investigations,
hazards associated with changes in the
workplace, emergency hazards, hazard
assessment and prioritization, and
hazard identification tools);
4. Hazard prevention and control
(including items such as what hazards
must be controlled, hazard control
priorities, and the effectiveness of the
controls);
5. Education and training (including
items such as content of training,
relationship to other OSHA training
requirements, and periodic training);
and
6. Program evaluation and
improvement (including items such as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
monitoring performance, correcting
program deficiencies, and improving
program performance).
Are these the appropriate elements?
Which elements are essential for an
effective approach? Should additional
elements be included?
• How can OSHA ensure that small
business employers are able to
implement and maintain an effective
Injury and Illness Prevention Program?
• Should an OSHA Injury and Illness
Prevention Program rule apply to every
business or should it be limited in some
way based on an employer’s size,
industry, incident rates, and/or hazard
indices?
• To what extent should OSHA rely
on existing consensus standards in
developing a rule?
• How can OSHA use State
experience with injury and illness
prevention in developing a rule?
• What mechanisms have been found
to be effective for enabling employees to
participate in safety and health in the
workplace?
• Given the variety of names used to
describe processes to reduce injuries
and illnesses in the workplace, what is
the most appropriate name for OSHA to
describe this topic?
III. Public Participation
Approximately 50 participants will be
accommodated in each meeting, and
eight hours will be allotted for each
meeting. Members of the general public
may observe, but not participate in, the
meetings on a first-come, first-served
basis as space permits. OSHA staff will
be present to take part in the
discussions. Logistics for the meetings
are being managed by Eastern Research
Group (ERG), which will provide a
facilitator and compile notes
summarizing the discussion; these notes
will not identify individual speakers.
ERG also will make an audio recording
of each session to ensure that the
summary notes are accurate; these
recordings will not be transcribed. The
summary notes will be available on
OSHA’s Web page at https://
www.osha.gov.
Specific information on the location
of each meeting can be found on the
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
Web site at https://www2.ergweb.com/
projects/conferences/osha/register-oshaI2P2.htm.
To participate in one of the
stakeholder meetings, or be a
nonparticipating observer, you may
submit a notice of intent electronically,
by facsimile, or by hard copy. To
encourage as wide a range of viewpoints
as possible, OSHA will confirm
participants as necessary to ensure a fair
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
representation of interests and to
facilitate gathering diverse viewpoints.
To receive a confirmation of your
participation 1 week before the meeting,
register by the date listed in the DATES
section of this notice. However,
registration will remain open until the
meetings are full. Additional
nonparticipating observers that do not
register for the meeting will be
accommodated as space permits. See the
ADDRESSES section of this notice for the
registration Web site, facsimile number,
and address. To register electronically,
follow the instructions provided on the
Web site. To register by mail or
facsimile, please indicate the following:
• Name, address, phone, fax, and email
• Meeting location you would like to
attend
• Organization for which you work
• Organization you represent (if
different)
• Stakeholder category: government,
industry, standards-developing
organization, research or testing agency,
union, trade association, insurance,
consultant, or other (if other, please
specify)
• Industry sector (if applicable)
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice, as well as news releases
and other relevant documents, are
available on the OSHA Web page at:
https://www.osha.gov.
IV. Authority and Signature
This document was prepared under
the direction of David Michaels, PhD,
MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.
Department of Labor, pursuant to
sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C.
653, 655, 657), 29 CFR part 1911, and
Secretary’s Order 5–2007 (72 FR 31160).
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 17,
2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–15041 Filed 6–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[Docket EPA–R10–OAR–2010–0294; FRL–
9165–3]
Determination of Attainment for PM10
for the Sandpoint PM10 Nonattainment
Area, Idaho
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35360-35362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15041]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
29 CFR Part 1910
Injury and Illness Prevention Program
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of additional stakeholder meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA invites interested parties to participate in two
stakeholder meetings on Injury and Illness Prevention Programs, in
addition to those meetings announced on May 4, 2010. OSHA recently
conducted two stakeholder meetings in East Brunswick, NJ, on June 3,
2010, and in Dallas, TX, on June 10, 2010. OSHA has closed registration
on a third meeting in Washington, DC, to be held on June 29, 2010. More
stakeholders expressed interest in participating in the Washington, DC
meeting than could be accommodated. Therefore, OSHA is issuing this
notice to announce an additional meeting in Washington, DC, as well as
a meeting in Sacramento, CA. OSHA plans to use the information gathered
at these meetings in developing an Injury and Illness Prevention
Program proposed rule. The discussions will be informal and will
provide the Agency with the necessary information to develop a rule
that will help employers reduce workplace injuries and illnesses
through a systematic process that proactively addresses workplace
safety and health hazards.
DATES: Dates and locations for the stakeholder meetings are:
July 20, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., in Washington, DC.
August 3, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., in Sacramento, CA.
The deadlines for confirmed registration at each meeting are July 6,
2010 and July 20, 2010 respectively.
ADDRESSES:
I. Registration
Submit your notice of intent to participate in one of the scheduled
meetings by one of the following methods:
Electronic. Register at https://www2.ergweb.com/projects/conferences/osha/register-osha-I2P2.htm (follow the instructions
online).
Facsimile. Fax your request to: (781) 674-2906, and label
it ``Attention: OSHA Injury and Illness Prevention Program Stakeholder
Meeting Registration.''
Regular mail, express delivery, hand (courier) delivery,
and messenger service.
Send your request to: Eastern Research Group, Inc., 110 Hartwell
Avenue, Lexington, MA 02421; Attention: OSHA Injury and Illness
Prevention Program Stakeholder Meeting Registration.
II. Meetings
Specific information on the location of each meeting can be found
on the Injury and Illness Prevention Program Web site at https://www2.ergweb.com/projects/conferences/osha/register-osha-I2P2.htm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries. Contact Jennifer Ashley, Director, OSHA
Office of Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 693-
1999.
General and technical information. Contact Michael
Seymour, OSHA Directorate of Standards and Guidance, Room N-3718, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210, telephone: (202) 693-1950.
Copies of this Federal Register notice. Electronic copies
are available at https://www.regulations.gov. This Federal Register
notice, as well as news releases and other relevant information, also
are available on the OSHA Web page at https://www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Over the past 30 years, the occupational safety and health
community has used various names to describe systematic approaches to
reducing injuries and illnesses in the workplace. OSHA has voluntary
Safety and Health Management Program guidelines, consensus and
international standards use the term ``Safety and Health Management
Systems,'' and OSHA's State plan States use terms such as ``Injury and
Illness Prevention Programs'' and ``Accident Prevention Programs.'' In
this notice, OSHA uses the term ``Injury and Illness Prevention
Programs.'' Regardless of the title, the common goal of these
approaches is to help employers reduce workplace injuries and illnesses
through a systematic process that proactively addresses workplace
safety and health hazards.
[[Page 35361]]
OSHA's History With Safety and Health Programs
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) (the
Act) in Section 17, paragraph (j), provides the Occupational Safety and
Health Review Commission (OSHRC) the authority to assess civil
penalties giving due consideration to the good faith of the employer.
Based on this paragraph of the Act, OSHA developed a policy of reducing
penalties for employers who have violated OSHA standards but who have
demonstrated a good faith effort to provide a safe and healthy
workplace to their employees. The Agency has long recognized the
implementation of a safety and health program as a way of demonstrating
good faith. Similarly, in its first decision, the OSHRC held that good
faith compliance efforts are gauged primarily by the presence of
effective safety and health programs (Nacirema Operating Co., 1 O.S.H.
Cas. (BNA) 1001 (Rev. Comm'n 1972)).
Over the years, OSHA established a number of initiatives to
encourage employers to develop and implement employee safety and health
programs. OSHA's Small Business Consultation Program, which offers
small businesses with exemplary safety and health programs an
opportunity for recognition under their Safety and Health Achievement
Recognition Program (SHARP) and the Agency's Voluntary Protection
Programs (VPP) are two examples of such initiatives. The Agency
established the VPP to recognize companies in the private sector with
outstanding records in the area of employee safety and health. It
became apparent that many of these worksites, which had higher levels
of compliance, fewer serious hazards, and injury and illness rates
markedly below industry averages, were relying on safety and health
programs to produce these results.
Based on the growing support for safety and health programs, OSHA
issued the Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines in 1989 (54
FR 3908). These guidelines reflect the best management practices of
successful companies and encourage employers to institute and maintain
a program which provides systematic policies, procedures, and practices
that are adequate to recognize and protect their employees from
occupational safety and health hazards. The guidelines identify four
major elements of an effective program: management commitment and
employee involvement; worksite analysis; hazard prevention and
controls; and safety and health training.
OSHA's Previous Rulemaking Effort
In October of 1995, OSHA held the first series of stakeholder
meetings to discuss preliminary ideas for a Safety and Health Program
rule and the significant issues raised by such a rule. Many small
businesses and organizations representing small businesses attended the
stakeholder meetings. Staff members from the Office of Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA) were also present at the
stakeholder meetings. In all, OSHA interacted with hundreds of
stakeholders, including employers, employees, employee representatives,
trade associations, State and local government personnel, safety and
health professionals, Advisory Committees, and other interested
parties.
In 1998, OSHA developed a draft proposed rule that required
employers in general industry and maritime workplaces to establish
safety and health programs. The program in the draft proposed rule had
five core elements, including: Management leadership and employee
participation; hazard identification and assessment; hazard prevention
and control; information and training; and evaluation of the program's
effectiveness. In developing the draft proposed rule, OSHA worked
extensively with stakeholders from labor, industry, safety and health
organizations, State governments, trade associations, insurance
companies, and small businesses.
On October 20, 1998, OSHA convened a Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) Panel for the draft Safety and Health
Program proposed rule. The Panel provided small entity representatives
(SERs) with initial drafts of the rule, a summary of the rule, the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, a summary of the benefits and
costs of the rule as it affected firms in the small entity
representative's industry, OSHA's draft enforcement policy for the
rule, and a list of issues of interest to panel members.
The SBREFA Panel held teleconferences and received written comments
from the SERs. The comments, and the Panel's responses to them, formed
the principal basis for the Panel's report. The Panel's report provided
background information on the draft proposed rule and the types of
small entities that would be subject to the proposed rule, described
the Panel's efforts to obtain the advice and recommendations of
representatives of those small entities, summarized the comments
received from those representatives, and presented the findings and
recommendations of the Panel.
A proposed Safety and Health Program rule was never published, and
the rulemaking effort was removed from the Regulatory Agenda on August
15, 2002. However, the effort in the 1990s showed the interest of OSHA,
the States, employers, employees, OSHA's advisory committees, and
others in a systematic process that proactively addresses workplace
safety and health hazards. It demonstrated that OSHA was not alone in
believing that these processes work to save lives and to prevent
injuries and illnesses in the workplace.
Safety and Health Management System Consensus Standards
Recently, consensus standards have been developed that address
safety and health management systems. The American Industrial Hygiene
Association published a voluntary consensus standard, ANSI/AIHA Z10--
2005 Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems, based on the
``Plan-Do-Check-Act'' cycle. The Z10 standard places an emphasis on
continual improvement and systematically eliminating the underlying
root cause of hazards. In addition, the Occupational Health and Safety
Assessment Series (OHSAS) Project Group, which is an international
association of government agencies, private industries, and consulting
organizations, developed OHSAS 18001--2007 Occupational Health and
Safety Management Systems in response to customer demand for a
recognized occupational health and safety management system standard
against which their management systems could be assessed and certified.
The OHSAS 18001 is published by the British Standards Institute.
II. Stakeholder Meetings
OSHA conducted stakeholder meetings in East Brunswick, NJ, on June
3, 2010, and in Dallas, TX, on June 10, 2010, announced in the Federal
Register on May 4, 2010, at 75 FR 23637) . A third meeting will be held
in Washington, DC, on June 29, 2010. Due to high demand for
participation in the first three meetings, and to provide an
opportunity for those unable to attend one of the prior meetings, OSHA
has decided to conduct additional stakeholder meetings in Washington,
DC, and Sacramento, CA.
The stakeholder meetings will provide OSHA with current information
and views from a wide range of interests. The meetings will be
conducted as a group discussion. To
[[Page 35362]]
facilitate as much group interaction as possible, formal presentations
will not be permitted. OSHA believes the stakeholder meeting discussion
should center on major issues such as:
Possible regulatory approaches
Scope and application of a rule
--Covered industries
--Covered employers (size, high/low injury rates)
--Covered hazards
--Relationship to existing OSHA requirements
Organization of a rule
--Regulatory text
--Mandatory or voluntary appendices
--Other standards incorporated by reference
The role of consensus standards
Economic impacts
Any additional topics as time permits
In addition, OSHA is interested in receiving feedback on the
following specific questions:
In light of the ANSI Z10 standard, the OHSAS 18001
standard, and OSHA's 1989 guidelines, what are the advantages and
disadvantages of addressing through rulemaking a systematic process
that proactively addresses workplace safety and health hazards?
Based on OSHA's experience, the Agency believes that an
Injury and Illness Prevention Program rule would include the following
elements:
1. Management duties (including items such as establishing a
policy, setting goals, planning and allocating resources, and assigning
and communicating roles and responsibilities);
2. Employee participation (including items such as involving
employees in establishing, maintaining and evaluating the program,
employee access to safety and health information, and employee role in
incident investigations);
3. Hazard identification and assessment (including items such as
what hazards must be identified, information gathering, workplace
inspections, incident investigations, hazards associated with changes
in the workplace, emergency hazards, hazard assessment and
prioritization, and hazard identification tools);
4. Hazard prevention and control (including items such as what
hazards must be controlled, hazard control priorities, and the
effectiveness of the controls);
5. Education and training (including items such as content of
training, relationship to other OSHA training requirements, and
periodic training); and
6. Program evaluation and improvement (including items such as
monitoring performance, correcting program deficiencies, and improving
program performance).
Are these the appropriate elements? Which elements are essential
for an effective approach? Should additional elements be included?
How can OSHA ensure that small business employers are able
to implement and maintain an effective Injury and Illness Prevention
Program?
Should an OSHA Injury and Illness Prevention Program rule
apply to every business or should it be limited in some way based on an
employer's size, industry, incident rates, and/or hazard indices?
To what extent should OSHA rely on existing consensus
standards in developing a rule?
How can OSHA use State experience with injury and illness
prevention in developing a rule?
What mechanisms have been found to be effective for
enabling employees to participate in safety and health in the
workplace?
Given the variety of names used to describe processes to
reduce injuries and illnesses in the workplace, what is the most
appropriate name for OSHA to describe this topic?
III. Public Participation
Approximately 50 participants will be accommodated in each meeting,
and eight hours will be allotted for each meeting. Members of the
general public may observe, but not participate in, the meetings on a
first-come, first-served basis as space permits. OSHA staff will be
present to take part in the discussions. Logistics for the meetings are
being managed by Eastern Research Group (ERG), which will provide a
facilitator and compile notes summarizing the discussion; these notes
will not identify individual speakers. ERG also will make an audio
recording of each session to ensure that the summary notes are
accurate; these recordings will not be transcribed. The summary notes
will be available on OSHA's Web page at https://www.osha.gov.
Specific information on the location of each meeting can be found
on the Injury and Illness Prevention Program Web site at https://www2.ergweb.com/projects/conferences/osha/register-osha-I2P2.htm.
To participate in one of the stakeholder meetings, or be a
nonparticipating observer, you may submit a notice of intent
electronically, by facsimile, or by hard copy. To encourage as wide a
range of viewpoints as possible, OSHA will confirm participants as
necessary to ensure a fair representation of interests and to
facilitate gathering diverse viewpoints. To receive a confirmation of
your participation 1 week before the meeting, register by the date
listed in the DATES section of this notice. However, registration will
remain open until the meetings are full. Additional nonparticipating
observers that do not register for the meeting will be accommodated as
space permits. See the ADDRESSES section of this notice for the
registration Web site, facsimile number, and address. To register
electronically, follow the instructions provided on the Web site. To
register by mail or facsimile, please indicate the following:
Name, address, phone, fax, and e-mail
Meeting location you would like to attend
Organization for which you work
Organization you represent (if different)
Stakeholder category: government, industry, standards-
developing organization, research or testing agency, union, trade
association, insurance, consultant, or other (if other, please specify)
Industry sector (if applicable)
Electronic copies of this Federal Register notice, as well as news
releases and other relevant documents, are available on the OSHA Web
page at: https://www.osha.gov.
IV. Authority and Signature
This document was prepared under the direction of David Michaels,
PhD, MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and
Health, U.S. Department of Labor, pursuant to sections 4, 6, and 8 of
the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655,
657), 29 CFR part 1911, and Secretary's Order 5-2007 (72 FR 31160).
Signed at Washington, DC, on June 17, 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-15041 Filed 6-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P