Tivoly, Inc., Derby Line, VT; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 34179 [2010-14453]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Notices 34179 TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 5/24/10 AND 5/28/10—Continued Subject firm (Petitioners) Location Freescale Semiconductor (Workers) ......................... Staedtler, Inc. (Company) .......................................... Atlas Copco Secoroc, LLC (Company) ..................... Mattel, Inc. (Company) .............................................. Home Fashions International (Workers) .................... Cameron Surface Systems (Company) ..................... Austin, TX ........................ Chatsworth, CA ............... Roanoke, VA ................... City of Industry, CA ......... Taylorsville, NC ............... Oklahoma City, OK .......... TA–W 74153 74154 74155 74156 74157 74158 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ [FR Doc. 2010–14451 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–70,201] sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES Tivoly, Inc., Derby Line, VT; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On November 16, 2009, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal Register on December 8, 2009 (74 FR 64,711). The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of cutting tools did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. In the request for reconsideration, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 1829, requested that additional customer surveys be done beyond the two that had been completed during the earlier investigation. In response to that request, the Department of Labor conducted a survey of five more major declining customers of the subject firm regarding their purchases of cutting tools, taps, and reamers during 2007, 2008, and during the months of January through May 2008 and January through May 2009. Those five surveys, added to the two surveys completed during the investigation, included customers who accounted for 89 percent of the subject firm’s total sales during 2007 and 2008, and customers who accounted for 65 percent of the total subject firm’s total sales during the period January through May 2009. The customers surveyed also accounted for 89 percent of the decline in total subject firm sales from 2007 to 2008, and 88 percent of the decline in VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:19 Jun 15, 2010 Jkt 220001 total subject firm sales during the period January through May 2009 as compared with the same five months in 2008. Those surveys showed customer imports of cutting tools, taps, and reamers to be insignificant as a percent of total subject firm sales during 2007 and 2008, and showed that there were no customer imports of cutting tools during the period January through May 2009. Conclusion After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Tivoly, Inc., Derby Line, Vermont. Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of May 2010. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2010–14453 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Prohibited Transaction Exemptions: Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and Its Current and Future Affiliates and Subsidiaries and Union Bank, N.A., and Its Affiliates; The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.; Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and Training Fund; Correction AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Department of Labor (the Department). ACTION: Notice of technical correction. In the June 11, 2010 issue of the Federal Register, the Department published separate administrative exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the Act) and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for: (1) Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., and Its Current and Future Affiliates and Subsidiaries and Union Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 05/28/10 05/28/10 05/28/10 05/28/10 05/28/10 05/28/10 Date of petition 05/27/10. 05/27/10. 05/24/10. 05/17/10. 05/22/10. 05/24/10. Bank, N.A., and Its Affiliates (hereinafter ‘‘the Morgan Stanley Grant’’); and (2) The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (hereinafter ‘‘the BNY Mellon Grant’’). The Department also published, in the same issue of the Federal Register, an administrative exemption from the prohibited transaction provisions of the Act for the Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and Training Fund (hereinafter ‘‘the Boston Carpenters Grant’’). The Department notes that the operative language of the Morgan Stanley Grant (which begins at the middle of the third column of page 33333 of the June 11, 2010 issue of the Federal Register after the italicized heading ‘‘Exemption’’) was not preceded by the customary caption indicating the prohibited transaction grant number and the corresponding exemption application file number. Accordingly, to correct this publication error, the following caption should be inserted immediately before the italicized heading ‘‘Exemption’’ on page 33333, third column: [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2010–16; Exemption Application Number D–11521] Employee Benefits Security Administration PO 00000 Date of institution In addition, the Department notes that the operative language of the BNY Mellon Grant (which begins at the middle of the first column of page 33338 of the June 11, 2010 issue of the Federal Register after the italicized heading ‘‘Exemption’’) was not preceded by the customary caption indicating the name of the entity seeking the exemption, the prohibited transaction exemption grant number, and the exemption application file number. Accordingly, to correct this publication error, the following caption should be inserted immediately before the italicized heading ‘‘Exemption’’ on page 33338, first column: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNY Mellon), Located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2010–17; Exemption Application Number D–11584] In addition, the Department notes that the operative language of the Boston Carpenters Grant (which begins at the E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 34179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,201]


Tivoly, Inc., Derby Line, VT; Notice of Negative Determination on 
Reconsideration

    On November 16, 2009, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on December 8, 2009 (74 FR 64,711).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of cutting tools did not contribute 
importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of 
production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the International Association 
of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 1829, requested that 
additional customer surveys be done beyond the two that had been 
completed during the earlier investigation.
    In response to that request, the Department of Labor conducted a 
survey of five more major declining customers of the subject firm 
regarding their purchases of cutting tools, taps, and reamers during 
2007, 2008, and during the months of January through May 2008 and 
January through May 2009.
    Those five surveys, added to the two surveys completed during the 
investigation, included customers who accounted for 89 percent of the 
subject firm's total sales during 2007 and 2008, and customers who 
accounted for 65 percent of the total subject firm's total sales during 
the period January through May 2009.
    The customers surveyed also accounted for 89 percent of the decline 
in total subject firm sales from 2007 to 2008, and 88 percent of the 
decline in total subject firm sales during the period January through 
May 2009 as compared with the same five months in 2008.
    Those surveys showed customer imports of cutting tools, taps, and 
reamers to be insignificant as a percent of total subject firm sales 
during 2007 and 2008, and showed that there were no customer imports of 
cutting tools during the period January through May 2009.

Conclusion

    After reconsideration, I affirm the original notice of negative 
determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance 
for workers and former workers of Tivoly, Inc., Derby Line, Vermont.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 27th day of May 2010.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-14453 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P