Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Availability of Funds for Projects To Develop and Demonstrate Integrated Tools, Training, and Methodologies for Growth Transformation and To Share With the MEP Program and Information Session for Potential Applicants, 33769-33772 [2010-14393]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Notices
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
Funding Availability and Limitation
of Liability: The funding periods and
funding amounts referenced in this
notice and request for proposals are
subject to the availability of funds, as
well as to Department of Commerce and
NIST priorities at the time of award. The
Department of Commerce and NIST will
not be held responsible for proposal
preparation costs. Publication of this
notice does not obligate the Department
of Commerce or NIST to award any
specific grant or cooperative agreement
or to obligate all or any part of available
funds.
Executive Order 12866: This funding
notice was determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12372: Applications
under this program are not subject to
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Notice and
comment are not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) or any other law, for rules relating
to public property, loans, grants,
benefits or contracts (5 U.S.C. 553 (a)).
Because notice and comment are not
required under 5 U.S.C. 553, or any
other law, for rules relating to public
property, loans, grants, benefits or
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)), a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required and
has not been prepared for this notice, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Dated: June 10, 2010.
David M. Robinson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–14394 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
[Docket Number: 1006080242–0242–01]
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
(MEP) Availability of Funds for
Projects To Develop and Demonstrate
Integrated Tools, Training, and
Methodologies for Growth
Transformation and To Share With the
MEP Program and Information Session
for Potential Applicants
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), Department of
Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST)
invites proposals from qualified
organizations for projects that address
new and emerging competitive needs of
manufacturers in areas consistent with
the NIST MEP Program’s five Strategic
Growth Areas (Supply Chain,
Sustainability, Technology
Acceleration, Workforce and
Continuous Improvement). Funded
projects will improve the
competitiveness of industries in the
applicant’s region, and contribute to the
long-term economic stability of the
region. Please see the NIST MEP Web
site, https://www.nist.gov/mep for details
on these strategies. Funded projects will
use innovative or collaborative
approaches to develop and demonstrate
integrated tools, training and
methodologies for growth
transformation that meet the Strategic
Growth Area needs and to share those
approaches with the MEP National
System. NIST MEP will hold a webinar
information session for organizations
considering applying to this
opportunity.
All applications must be
received or postmarked no later than
5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time
on July 15, 2010. Late proposals will not
be reviewed. NIST MEP will hold a free
webinar information session for
organizations considering applying to
this opportunity on June 22, 2010 at 2
p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time.
Information Sessions: NIST MEP will
hold an information session for
organizations considering applying to
this opportunity. The information
session will be in the form of a webinar
to be held on the date stated in the
DATES section of this Federal Register
Notice (7 days following the posting of
the announcement). Registration
information will be posted on the NIST
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33769
MEP public Web site https://
www.nist.gov/mep.
ADDRESSES: Hard copy submissions
should be sent to: National Institute of
Standards and Technology,
Manufacturing Extension Partnership,
c/o Diane Henderson, 100 Bureau Drive,
Stop 4800, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–
4800. Electronic submissions should be
uploaded to https://www.Grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
paper copy of the Federal Register
Notice (FRN) may be obtained by calling
(301) 975–6328. Administrative, budget,
cost-sharing, and eligibility questions
should be addressed to Diane
Henderson at Tel: (301) 975–5105; Email: diane.henderson@nist.gov; Fax:
(301) 963–6556. Project evaluation
criteria and other programmatic
questions should be addressed to Alex
Folk at Tel: (301) 975–8089; E-mail:
alex.folk@nist.gov; Fax: (301) 963–6556.
Grants Administration questions should
be addressed to: Grants and Agreements
Management Division, National Institute
of Standards and Technology, 100
Bureau Drive, Stop 1650, Gaithersburg,
MD 20899–1650; Tel: (301) 975–6328.
For assistance with using Grants.gov
contact support@grants.gov or call 800–
518–4726. All questions and responses
will be posted on the MEP Web site,
https://www.nist.gov/mep.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic access: Applicants are
strongly encouraged to read the Federal
Funding Opportunity (FFO)
announcement available at https://
www.grants.gov for complete
information about this program,
including all program requirements and
instructions for applying by paper or
electronically. The FFO may be found
by searching under the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Name and
Number provided below.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 278(k)(f).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Name and Number: Manufacturing Extension
Partnership—11.611)
Information Session: NIST MEP will
hold a free information session for
organizations considering applying to
this opportunity. The information
session will be in the form of a free
webinar to be held on the date specified
in the DATES section above at 2 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Saving Time.
Organizations wishing to participate in
the webinar must register at the NIST
MEP public Web site https://
www.nist.gov/mep.
Program Description: The objective of
NIST MEP program is to increase
productivity, enhance technological
performance, and strengthen the global
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
33770
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Notices
competitiveness of small- and mediumsized U.S. based manufacturing firms. In
accordance with 15 U.S.C. 278k(f), the
NIST Director, in consultation with the
Director of the MEP Centers Program,
the MEP Advisory Board, and small and
medium-sized manufacturers, has
identified five Strategic Growth Areas
that address new or emerging
manufacturing problems, which are
addressed in this competition. The five
Strategic Growth Areas upon which the
competition will focus are: Supply
Chain, Sustainability, Technology
Acceleration, Workforce and
Continuous Improvement. NIST invites
proposals from qualified organizations
for funding projects that address the five
Strategic Growth Areas. Please see the
NIST MEP Web site, https://
www.nist.gov/mep for details on these
Strategic Growth Areas. Funded projects
will improve the competitiveness of
industries in the applicant’s region, and
contribute to the long-term economic
stability of the region. Competitive
projects will use innovative or
collaborative approaches to develop and
demonstrate integrated tools, training
and methodologies for growth
transformation that meet the Strategic
Growth Area needs and to share those
approaches with the MEP National
System.
All organizations meeting eligibility
requirements provided herein are
invited to submit proposals.
It is important that these awards be
well aligned with the MEP national
system of extension service providers in
order to maximize the potential and
impact of existing resources available to
manufacturers through the MEP
Program. Further information regarding
this MEP Program is provided in the
information packet, which can be
obtained at https://www.grants.gov, with
additional background information
provided at https://www.nist.gov/mep.
The proposal should include plans for
integration into the MEP national
system and linkages to appropriate
national resources.
Funding Availability: The total
amount awarded under this solicitation
will not exceed $3,500,000.
Projects initiated under this category
may be carried out over a period of up
to three years. If NIST selects a proposal
for a multi-year award, funding will
generally be provided for only the first
year of the program. Continuation of an
award or extensions of the period of
performance is at the total discretion of
the NIST. If NIST selects an application
for funding, NIST has no obligation to
provide any additional future funding in
connection with that award. Funding for
each subsequent year of a multi-year
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
proposal will be contingent upon
satisfactory progress and the availability
of funds. Projects are expected to start
within 30 days of award notice.
Cost Share Requirements: Recipients
of awards under this solicitation are not
required to provide cost share.
Eligibility: Eligible applicants include
existing MEP extension centers or
consortia of centers. A consortium of
MEP centers is strongly encouraged to
adequately demonstrate the leveraging
of resources and competencies tied to
the strategic areas.
Application Requirements:
Applications must be submitted in
accordance with the requirements set
forth in the corresponding FFO
announcement.
Evaluation Criteria: All qualified
proposals will be evaluated based on the
following seven criteria, which are
assigned equal weighting.
(1) Demonstration that the proposed
project outputs and objectives are
aligned with and will meet the technical
assistance needs of technical assistance
providers and manufacturers. The
proposal must clearly articulate the
needs to be addressed and solutions to
be demonstrated within the proposed
scope. The proposal should show that
the efforts being proposed meet the
needs identified and clearly defined
deliverables.
Factors that may be considered
include: a clear articulation of the tools,
training and methodologies to be
developed; an articulation of the five
MEP Strategic Growth Areas (Supply
Chain, Sustainability, Technology
Acceleration, Workforce and
Continuous Improvement); and
demonstration of what and how the
proposed integration of the areas will be
achieved.
(2) Development methodology and
leverage of existing resources. The
proposal must describe the technical
plan for the development of the tool(s)
or resource(s), including a clearly
articulated project plan for
development, training and
demonstration of the products or
deliverables. Sources of expertise to be
used should be clearly delineated and
may include sources internal to the
proposer or from other organizations.
Factors that may be considered include:
adequacy of the proposed technical
plan; strength of core competency in the
proposed area of activity; and
demonstrated access to relevant subject
matter expertise external to the
organization.
(3) Degree of integration with the
manufacturing extension partnership.
The proposal must demonstrate that the
tool or resource will be integrated into
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and will be of service to the NIST
Manufacturing Extension Centers.
Factors that may be considered include:
ability to access the tool or resource
especially by MEP extension centers;
adequacy of methodology for
disseminating or promoting use of the
tool or technique especially within the
MEP system; and demonstrated interest
in using the tool or technique especially
by MEP extension centers. A plan that
reflects not only the development
activities but the specific actions needed
to educate, train and deploy within the
MEP system is critical.
(4) Coordination with other relevant
organizations. Wherever possible the
project should be coordinated with and
leverage other organizations including
other MEP extension centers which are
developing or have expertise on similar
tools, techniques, practices, or analyses.
If no such organizations exist, the
proposal should show that this is the
case. Applicants will need to describe
how they will coordinate to allow for
increased economies of scale and to
avoid duplication. Factors that may be
considered include: demonstrated
understanding of existing organizations
and resources relevant to the proposed
project; adequate linkages and
partnerships with existing organizations
and clear definition of those
organizations’ roles in the proposed
activities; and demonstration that the
proposed activity does not duplicate
existing services or resources.
(5) Program evaluation. The applicant
should specify plans for evaluation of
the effectiveness of the proposed tool(s),
or technique(s) or methodologies and for
ensuring continuous improvement of
each. Factors that may be considered
include: Thoroughness of evaluation
plans, (including internal evaluation for
management control); use of adequate
case studies for the use of external
evaluation for assessing outcomes of the
activity; adoption by MEP centers of
products developed; and adequate
‘‘customer satisfaction’’ measures of
performance.
(6) Management experience and
plans. Applicants should specify plans
for proper project staffing, and
management of the project. Factors that
may be considered include:
appropriateness and authority of the
organization to conduct the proposed
activities; qualifications of the project
team and the project team’s leadership
to conduct the proposed activity; and
appropriateness of the organizational
approach for carrying out the proposed
project.
(7) Financial plan. Applicants should
show the relevance and cost
effectiveness of the financial plan for
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Notices
meeting the objectives of the project;
and the firmness and level of the
applicant’s total financial capacity for
the project. Factors that may be
considered include: Reasonableness of
the budget; strength of commitment;
effectiveness of management plans for
control of budget; and demonstration of
past successful experience on similar
projects.
Selection Factors
The Selecting Official, who is the
Director of the NIST MEP Program,
anticipates recommending proposals for
funding in rank order of scores based on
the criteria listed above unless a
proposal is justified to be awarded out
of rank order based on one or more of
the following selection factors:
1. Availability of Federal funds.
2. Appropriate consideration for
coverage of all five MEP Strategic
Growth Areas.
3. Whether this project duplicates
other projects funded by Department of
Commerce or other Federal agencies.
Proposal Review and Selection Process
a. Proposal Qualification
All proposals will be reviewed by
NIST to assure that they are complete
and responsive.
All complete and responsive
proposals will be designated qualified
proposals; all others will be disqualified
at this phase of the evaluation and
selection process.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
b. Proposal Review and Selection of
Finalists
NIST will appoint an evaluation panel
to review and evaluate all qualified
proposals in accordance with the
evaluation criteria set forth in this part.
The evaluation panel will consist of
NIST employees, and in some cases,
other federal employees or non-federal
experts who sign non-disclosure
agreements. If the review panel is
composed of non-federal employees, the
reviewers will provide individual
scores, and no consensus advice will be
given. A site visit may be required to
fully evaluate a proposal. If NIST
determines that site visits are necessary,
the site visits would take place after the
review panel conducts its initial review.
The Evaluation Panel and Chair will
conduct site visits for all proposals that
meet a minimum threshold score to be
determined by NIST. All proposals will
be numerically ranked and then
submitted to the Selecting Official, the
Director of the NIST MEP Program for
selection based on the ranking, site visit
comments if conducted, and the
selection factors listed above.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
NIST may enter into negotiations with
the finalists concerning any aspect of
their proposal.
c. Award Determination
The Selecting Official shall select
awardees based on total evaluation
scores/rank and the selection factors
provided above and make funding
recommendations to the NIST Grants
Officer. Upon the final award decision,
a notification will be made to each of
the proposing organizations.
The final approval of selected
applications and award of financial
assistance will be made by the NIST
Grants Officer based on compliance
with application requirements as
published in this notice, compliance
with applicable legal and regulatory
requirements, and whether the
recommended applicants appear to be
responsible. Applicants may be asked to
modify objectives, work plans, or
budgets and provide supplemental
information required by the agency
prior to award. As a result of the
selection process, NIST may fund all,
some, or parts of the eligible
applications submitted, or none at all.
The decision of the Grants Officer is
final.
Unsuccessful applicants will be
notified in writing. The Program will
retain one copy of each unsuccessful
application for three years for record
keeping purposes. The remaining copies
will be destroyed.
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements:
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements,
which are contained in the Federal
Register Notice of February 11, 2008 (73
FR 7696), are applicable to this notice.
Please refer to https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System: On the form SF–424
items 8.b. and 8.c., the applicant’s 9digit Employer/Taxpayer Identification
Number (EIN/TIN) and 9-digit Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number must be
consistent with the information on the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
(https://www.ccr.gov) and Automated
Standard Application for Payment
System (ASAP). For complex
organizations with multiple EIN/TIN
and DUNS numbers, the EIN/TIN and
DUNS number MUST be the numbers
for the applying organization.
Organizations that provide incorrect/
inconsistent EIN/TIN and DUNS
numbers may experience significant
delays in receiving funds if their
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33771
proposal is selected for funding. Please
confirm that the EIN/TIN and DUNS
number are consistent with the
information on the CCR and ASAP.
Paperwork Reduction Act: The
standard forms in the application kit
involve a collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
The use of Standard Forms 424, 424A,
424B, SF–LLL, and CD–346 have been
approved by OMB under the respective
Control Numbers 0348–0043, 0348–
0044, 0348–0040, 0348–0046, and 0605–
0001. MEP program-specific application
requirements have been approved by
OMB under Control Number 0693–0056.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
Funding Availability and Limitation
of Liability: The funding periods and
funding amounts referenced in this
notice and request for proposals are
subject to the availability of funds, as
well as to Department of Commerce and
NIST priorities at the time of award. The
Department of Commerce and NIST will
not be held responsible for proposal
preparation costs. Publication of this
notice does not obligate the Department
of Commerce or NIST to award any
specific grant or cooperative agreement
or to obligate all or any part of available
funds.
Executive Order 12866: This funding
notice was determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12372: Applications
under this program are not subject to
Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Notice and
comment are not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) or any other law, for rules relating
to public property, loans, grants,
benefits or contracts (5 U.S.C. 553 (a)).
Because notice and comment are not
required under 5 U.S.C. 553, or any
other law, for rules relating to public
property, loans, grants, benefits or
contracts (5 U.S.C. 553(a)), a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required and
has not been prepared for this notice, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
33772
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Notices
Dated: June 10, 2010.
David M. Robinson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–14393 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–557–813]
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From
Malaysia: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: At the request of interested
parties, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs)
from Malaysia. The review covers one
manufacturer/exporter. The period of
review is August 1, 2008, through July
31, 2009. We have preliminarily
determined that sales have been made at
prices below normal value by Euro
Plastics Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. We invite
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results. Parties who submit
comments in this review are requested
to submit with each argument a
statement of the issue and a brief
summary of the argument.
DATES: Effective Date: June 15, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jerrold Freeman or Richard Rimlinger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0180 or (202) 482–
4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
On August 9, 2004, we published in
the Federal Register the antidumping
duty order on PRCBs from Malaysia. See
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Retail Carrier Bags From Malaysia, 69
FR 48203 (August 9, 2004). On August
3, 2009, we published in the Federal
Register a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on PRCBs from
Malaysia. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 74
FR 38397 (August 3, 2009). Pursuant to
section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.213(b), the Polyethylene Retail
Carrier Bag Committee and its
individual members, Hilex Poly Co.,
LLC, and Superbag Corporation
(collectively, the petitioners), and Euro
Plastics Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and its
affiliated trading company, Eplastics
Procurement Center Sdn. Bhd.
(collectively, Euro Plastics), requested
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on PRCBs from
Malaysia with respect to Euro Plastics.
On September 22, 2009, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we
initiated the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on PRCBs
from Malaysia for the period of review.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 48224 (September 22, 2009).
Although Euro Plastics withdrew its
request for the Department to conduct
the administrative review on October
30, 2009, the request by the petitioners
for the Department to conduct an
administrative review of Euro Plastics
remains in effect.
As explained in the memorandum
from the Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, we have
exercised our discretion to toll
deadlines for the duration of the closure
of the Federal Government from
February 5 through February 12, 2010.
Thus, all deadlines in this segment of
the proceeding have been extended by
seven days. See Memorandum to the
Record from Ronald Lorentzen, DAS for
Import Administration, regarding
‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As
a Result of the Government Closure
During the Recent Snowstorm,’’ dated
February 12, 2010. On May 7, 2010, we
extended the due date for the
preliminary results of this
administrative review to June 9, 2010.
See Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags
From Malaysia: Extension of Time Limit
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
25207 (May 7, 2010).
Period of Review
The period of review is August 1,
2008, through July 31, 2009.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
antidumping duty order is PRCBs which
may be referred to as t-shirt sacks,
merchandise bags, grocery bags, or
checkout bags. The subject merchandise
is defined as non-sealable sacks and
bags with handles (including
drawstrings), without zippers or integral
extruded closures, with or without
gussets, with or without printing, of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
polyethylene film having a thickness no
greater than 0.035 inch (0.889 mm) and
no less than 0.00035 inch (0.00889 mm),
and with no length or width shorter
than 6 inches (15.24 cm) or longer than
40 inches (101.6 cm). The depth of the
bag may be shorter than 6 inches (15.24
cm) but not longer than 40 inches (101.6
cm).
PRCBs are typically provided without
any consumer packaging and free of
charge by retail establishments, e.g.,
grocery, drug, convenience, department,
specialty retail, discount stores, and
restaurants, to their customers to
package and carry their purchased
products. The scope of the order
excludes (1) polyethylene bags that are
not printed with logos or store names
and that are closeable with drawstrings
made of polyethylene film and (2)
polyethylene bags that are packed in
consumer packaging with printing that
refers to specific end-uses other than
packaging and carrying merchandise
from retail establishments, e.g., garbage
bags, lawn bags, trashcan liners.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are currently classifiable under
statistical category 3923.21.0085 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). This
subheading also covers products that are
outside the scope of the order.
Furthermore, although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
For the reasons discussed below, we
determine that the use of adverse facts
available is appropriate for the
preliminary results with respect to Euro
Plastics.
A. Use of Facts Available
Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides
that, if an interested party withholds
information requested by the
administering authority, fails to provide
such information by the deadlines for
submission of the information and in
the form or manner requested,
significantly impedes a proceeding
under this title, or provides such
information but the information cannot
be verified as provided in section 782(i)
of the Act, the Department shall use
facts otherwise available in reaching the
applicable determination.
On September 28, 2009, we sent our
questionnaire to Euro Plastics. On
October 30, 2009, Euro Plastics
withdrew the request for the
Department to conduct the 2008–2009
administrative review because, as
explained in the submission, Euro
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33769-33772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14393]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and Technology
[Docket Number: 1006080242-0242-01]
Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Availability of Funds
for Projects To Develop and Demonstrate Integrated Tools, Training, and
Methodologies for Growth Transformation and To Share With the MEP
Program and Information Session for Potential Applicants
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
invites proposals from qualified organizations for projects that
address new and emerging competitive needs of manufacturers in areas
consistent with the NIST MEP Program's five Strategic Growth Areas
(Supply Chain, Sustainability, Technology Acceleration, Workforce and
Continuous Improvement). Funded projects will improve the
competitiveness of industries in the applicant's region, and contribute
to the long-term economic stability of the region. Please see the NIST
MEP Web site, https://www.nist.gov/mep for details on these strategies.
Funded projects will use innovative or collaborative approaches to
develop and demonstrate integrated tools, training and methodologies
for growth transformation that meet the Strategic Growth Area needs and
to share those approaches with the MEP National System. NIST MEP will
hold a webinar information session for organizations considering
applying to this opportunity.
DATES: All applications must be received or postmarked no later than
5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time on July 15, 2010. Late proposals
will not be reviewed. NIST MEP will hold a free webinar information
session for organizations considering applying to this opportunity on
June 22, 2010 at 2 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving Time.
Information Sessions: NIST MEP will hold an information session for
organizations considering applying to this opportunity. The information
session will be in the form of a webinar to be held on the date stated
in the DATES section of this Federal Register Notice (7 days following
the posting of the announcement). Registration information will be
posted on the NIST MEP public Web site https://www.nist.gov/mep.
ADDRESSES: Hard copy submissions should be sent to: National Institute
of Standards and Technology, Manufacturing Extension Partnership, c/o
Diane Henderson, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4800, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-
4800. Electronic submissions should be uploaded to https://www.Grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A paper copy of the Federal Register
Notice (FRN) may be obtained by calling (301) 975-6328. Administrative,
budget, cost-sharing, and eligibility questions should be addressed to
Diane Henderson at Tel: (301) 975-5105; E-mail:
diane.henderson@nist.gov; Fax: (301) 963-6556. Project evaluation
criteria and other programmatic questions should be addressed to Alex
Folk at Tel: (301) 975-8089; E-mail: alex.folk@nist.gov; Fax: (301)
963-6556. Grants Administration questions should be addressed to:
Grants and Agreements Management Division, National Institute of
Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 1650, Gaithersburg, MD
20899-1650; Tel: (301) 975-6328. For assistance with using Grants.gov
contact support@grants.gov or call 800-518-4726. All questions and
responses will be posted on the MEP Web site, https://www.nist.gov/mep.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic access: Applicants are strongly encouraged to read the
Federal Funding Opportunity (FFO) announcement available at https://
www.grants.gov for complete information about this program, including
all program requirements and instructions for applying by paper or
electronically. The FFO may be found by searching under the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Name and Number provided below.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 278(k)(f).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Name and Number:
Manufacturing Extension Partnership--11.611)
Information Session: NIST MEP will hold a free information session
for organizations considering applying to this opportunity. The
information session will be in the form of a free webinar to be held on
the date specified in the DATES section above at 2 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Saving Time. Organizations wishing to participate in the
webinar must register at the NIST MEP public Web site https://www.nist.gov/mep.
Program Description: The objective of NIST MEP program is to
increase productivity, enhance technological performance, and
strengthen the global
[[Page 33770]]
competitiveness of small- and medium-sized U.S. based manufacturing
firms. In accordance with 15 U.S.C. 278k(f), the NIST Director, in
consultation with the Director of the MEP Centers Program, the MEP
Advisory Board, and small and medium-sized manufacturers, has
identified five Strategic Growth Areas that address new or emerging
manufacturing problems, which are addressed in this competition. The
five Strategic Growth Areas upon which the competition will focus are:
Supply Chain, Sustainability, Technology Acceleration, Workforce and
Continuous Improvement. NIST invites proposals from qualified
organizations for funding projects that address the five Strategic
Growth Areas. Please see the NIST MEP Web site, https://www.nist.gov/mep
for details on these Strategic Growth Areas. Funded projects will
improve the competitiveness of industries in the applicant's region,
and contribute to the long-term economic stability of the region.
Competitive projects will use innovative or collaborative approaches to
develop and demonstrate integrated tools, training and methodologies
for growth transformation that meet the Strategic Growth Area needs and
to share those approaches with the MEP National System.
All organizations meeting eligibility requirements provided herein
are invited to submit proposals.
It is important that these awards be well aligned with the MEP
national system of extension service providers in order to maximize the
potential and impact of existing resources available to manufacturers
through the MEP Program. Further information regarding this MEP Program
is provided in the information packet, which can be obtained at https://
www.grants.gov, with additional background information provided at
https://www.nist.gov/mep.
The proposal should include plans for integration into the MEP
national system and linkages to appropriate national resources.
Funding Availability: The total amount awarded under this
solicitation will not exceed $3,500,000.
Projects initiated under this category may be carried out over a
period of up to three years. If NIST selects a proposal for a multi-
year award, funding will generally be provided for only the first year
of the program. Continuation of an award or extensions of the period of
performance is at the total discretion of the NIST. If NIST selects an
application for funding, NIST has no obligation to provide any
additional future funding in connection with that award. Funding for
each subsequent year of a multi-year proposal will be contingent upon
satisfactory progress and the availability of funds. Projects are
expected to start within 30 days of award notice.
Cost Share Requirements: Recipients of awards under this
solicitation are not required to provide cost share.
Eligibility: Eligible applicants include existing MEP extension
centers or consortia of centers. A consortium of MEP centers is
strongly encouraged to adequately demonstrate the leveraging of
resources and competencies tied to the strategic areas.
Application Requirements: Applications must be submitted in
accordance with the requirements set forth in the corresponding FFO
announcement.
Evaluation Criteria: All qualified proposals will be evaluated
based on the following seven criteria, which are assigned equal
weighting.
(1) Demonstration that the proposed project outputs and objectives
are aligned with and will meet the technical assistance needs of
technical assistance providers and manufacturers. The proposal must
clearly articulate the needs to be addressed and solutions to be
demonstrated within the proposed scope. The proposal should show that
the efforts being proposed meet the needs identified and clearly
defined deliverables.
Factors that may be considered include: a clear articulation of the
tools, training and methodologies to be developed; an articulation of
the five MEP Strategic Growth Areas (Supply Chain, Sustainability,
Technology Acceleration, Workforce and Continuous Improvement); and
demonstration of what and how the proposed integration of the areas
will be achieved.
(2) Development methodology and leverage of existing resources. The
proposal must describe the technical plan for the development of the
tool(s) or resource(s), including a clearly articulated project plan
for development, training and demonstration of the products or
deliverables. Sources of expertise to be used should be clearly
delineated and may include sources internal to the proposer or from
other organizations. Factors that may be considered include: adequacy
of the proposed technical plan; strength of core competency in the
proposed area of activity; and demonstrated access to relevant subject
matter expertise external to the organization.
(3) Degree of integration with the manufacturing extension
partnership. The proposal must demonstrate that the tool or resource
will be integrated into and will be of service to the NIST
Manufacturing Extension Centers. Factors that may be considered
include: ability to access the tool or resource especially by MEP
extension centers; adequacy of methodology for disseminating or
promoting use of the tool or technique especially within the MEP
system; and demonstrated interest in using the tool or technique
especially by MEP extension centers. A plan that reflects not only the
development activities but the specific actions needed to educate,
train and deploy within the MEP system is critical.
(4) Coordination with other relevant organizations. Wherever
possible the project should be coordinated with and leverage other
organizations including other MEP extension centers which are
developing or have expertise on similar tools, techniques, practices,
or analyses. If no such organizations exist, the proposal should show
that this is the case. Applicants will need to describe how they will
coordinate to allow for increased economies of scale and to avoid
duplication. Factors that may be considered include: demonstrated
understanding of existing organizations and resources relevant to the
proposed project; adequate linkages and partnerships with existing
organizations and clear definition of those organizations' roles in the
proposed activities; and demonstration that the proposed activity does
not duplicate existing services or resources.
(5) Program evaluation. The applicant should specify plans for
evaluation of the effectiveness of the proposed tool(s), or
technique(s) or methodologies and for ensuring continuous improvement
of each. Factors that may be considered include: Thoroughness of
evaluation plans, (including internal evaluation for management
control); use of adequate case studies for the use of external
evaluation for assessing outcomes of the activity; adoption by MEP
centers of products developed; and adequate ``customer satisfaction''
measures of performance.
(6) Management experience and plans. Applicants should specify
plans for proper project staffing, and management of the project.
Factors that may be considered include: appropriateness and authority
of the organization to conduct the proposed activities; qualifications
of the project team and the project team's leadership to conduct the
proposed activity; and appropriateness of the organizational approach
for carrying out the proposed project.
(7) Financial plan. Applicants should show the relevance and cost
effectiveness of the financial plan for
[[Page 33771]]
meeting the objectives of the project; and the firmness and level of
the applicant's total financial capacity for the project. Factors that
may be considered include: Reasonableness of the budget; strength of
commitment; effectiveness of management plans for control of budget;
and demonstration of past successful experience on similar projects.
Selection Factors
The Selecting Official, who is the Director of the NIST MEP
Program, anticipates recommending proposals for funding in rank order
of scores based on the criteria listed above unless a proposal is
justified to be awarded out of rank order based on one or more of the
following selection factors:
1. Availability of Federal funds.
2. Appropriate consideration for coverage of all five MEP Strategic
Growth Areas.
3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded by
Department of Commerce or other Federal agencies.
Proposal Review and Selection Process
a. Proposal Qualification
All proposals will be reviewed by NIST to assure that they are
complete and responsive.
All complete and responsive proposals will be designated qualified
proposals; all others will be disqualified at this phase of the
evaluation and selection process.
b. Proposal Review and Selection of Finalists
NIST will appoint an evaluation panel to review and evaluate all
qualified proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria set
forth in this part. The evaluation panel will consist of NIST
employees, and in some cases, other federal employees or non-federal
experts who sign non-disclosure agreements. If the review panel is
composed of non-federal employees, the reviewers will provide
individual scores, and no consensus advice will be given. A site visit
may be required to fully evaluate a proposal. If NIST determines that
site visits are necessary, the site visits would take place after the
review panel conducts its initial review. The Evaluation Panel and
Chair will conduct site visits for all proposals that meet a minimum
threshold score to be determined by NIST. All proposals will be
numerically ranked and then submitted to the Selecting Official, the
Director of the NIST MEP Program for selection based on the ranking,
site visit comments if conducted, and the selection factors listed
above.
NIST may enter into negotiations with the finalists concerning any
aspect of their proposal.
c. Award Determination
The Selecting Official shall select awardees based on total
evaluation scores/rank and the selection factors provided above and
make funding recommendations to the NIST Grants Officer. Upon the final
award decision, a notification will be made to each of the proposing
organizations.
The final approval of selected applications and award of financial
assistance will be made by the NIST Grants Officer based on compliance
with application requirements as published in this notice, compliance
with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, and whether the
recommended applicants appear to be responsible. Applicants may be
asked to modify objectives, work plans, or budgets and provide
supplemental information required by the agency prior to award. As a
result of the selection process, NIST may fund all, some, or parts of
the eligible applications submitted, or none at all. The decision of
the Grants Officer is final.
Unsuccessful applicants will be notified in writing. The Program
will retain one copy of each unsuccessful application for three years
for record keeping purposes. The remaining copies will be destroyed.
The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements: The Department of Commerce Pre-Award
Notification Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements, which
are contained in the Federal Register Notice of February 11, 2008 (73
FR 7696), are applicable to this notice. Please refer to https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System: On the form SF-
424 items 8.b. and 8.c., the applicant's 9-digit Employer/Taxpayer
Identification Number (EIN/TIN) and 9-digit Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number must be consistent with the
information on the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) (https://
www.ccr.gov) and Automated Standard Application for Payment System
(ASAP). For complex organizations with multiple EIN/TIN and DUNS
numbers, the EIN/TIN and DUNS number MUST be the numbers for the
applying organization. Organizations that provide incorrect/
inconsistent EIN/TIN and DUNS numbers may experience significant delays
in receiving funds if their proposal is selected for funding. Please
confirm that the EIN/TIN and DUNS number are consistent with the
information on the CCR and ASAP.
Paperwork Reduction Act: The standard forms in the application kit
involve a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, SF-LLL, and CD-346 have
been approved by OMB under the respective Control Numbers 0348-0043,
0348-0044, 0348-0040, 0348-0046, and 0605-0001. MEP program-specific
application requirements have been approved by OMB under Control Number
0693-0056.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Funding Availability and Limitation of Liability: The funding
periods and funding amounts referenced in this notice and request for
proposals are subject to the availability of funds, as well as to
Department of Commerce and NIST priorities at the time of award. The
Department of Commerce and NIST will not be held responsible for
proposal preparation costs. Publication of this notice does not
obligate the Department of Commerce or NIST to award any specific grant
or cooperative agreement or to obligate all or any part of available
funds.
Executive Order 12866: This funding notice was determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): It has been determined that
this notice does not contain policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 12372: Applications under this program are not
subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.''
Administrative Procedure Act/Regulatory Flexibility Act: Notice and
comment are not required under the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. 553) or any other law, for rules relating to public property,
loans, grants, benefits or contracts (5 U.S.C. 553 (a)). Because notice
and comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, for
rules relating to public property, loans, grants, benefits or contracts
(5 U.S.C. 553(a)), a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required
and has not been prepared for this notice, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
[[Page 33772]]
Dated: June 10, 2010.
David M. Robinson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-14393 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P