Application Nos. and Proposed Exemptions; D-11573, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Its Affiliates (Together, CGMI or the Applicant); and L-11624, Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and Training Fund (the Fund), et al., 33343-33355 [2010-14023]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
reduction from the 6.7 million hours
worked in the prior calendar year; and
(b) that IFS has no independent source
for this data. IFS represents that the
‘‘worst case’’ scenario IFS developed was
based on a decrease in hours from 6.7
million in 2008 to 1.1 million in 2022,
which is a reduction of 84 percent
(84%). IFS considers the 1.1 million
level to be a sufficiently ‘‘worst case’’
economic scenario for this test. IFS
represents that this scenario anticipated
a significant decrease in hours for the
2009 period already, albeit somewhat
less than the actual 1.9 million hours. A
29 percent (29%) decline in any one
year is within the range of possibility for
the aggregate worst case result modeled
by IFS. In the model, IFS developed,
maintaining the overall 5.6 million hour
reduction after substituting the actual
reduction in calendar year 2009 merely
requires that the average declining rate
over the final ten (10) years to average
14.5 percent (14.5%), rather than 16
percent (16%). IFS concludes that a 29
percent (29%) reduction in work hours
in one year is within the reasonable
limits of volatility for the overall 84
percent (84%) decline that IFS modeled
between 2008 and 2022. Accordingly,
IFS considers the worst case scenario to
remain valid.
With regard to the feasibility of the
subject transaction, the applicant points
out that the structure of the exemption
is more important than the actual
number of carpenter work hours in any
month. In this regard, the applicant
states that IFS, acting as the
independent fiduciary on behalf of the
Fund, is responsible for reviewing the
financing terms, the Fund’s cash flow,
and the amount of projected employer
contributions to the Fund. Further, the
applicant states that IFS will determine
whether the transaction is feasible, in
the interest of, and protective of the
participants. If the transaction does not
satisfy those requirements, the applicant
states that IFS will not approve the
transaction.
In conclusion, it is the applicant’s
view that the Fund’s purchase of a new
facility is in furtherance of its long-term
commitment to its core mission of
training apprentices and carpenters in
the Boston area. The decision by the
Trustees to purchase the Condo and the
decision of how much to pay for the
Condo are not based on the number of
carpenter work hours in a peak period
or during a recession, but on an analysis
of the training needs of participants and
the projected revenues and expenses of
the Fund over the long term.
Furthermore, the applicant points out
that while the economic downturn has
caused a decline in carpenter work
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
hours and contributions to the Fund, it
has also resulted in lower interest rate
financing, and lower construction costs
for the renovation of the Building. In
addition, because of the decline in real
estate value, the Fund is likely to
experience a savings in the purchase
price of the Condo, as the fair market
value is expected to be less than the
Fund’s pro rata share of the
construction costs for the renovation of
the Building. The applicant maintains
that IFS will analyze all of these factors
before making its final decision on
whether to proceed with the subject
transaction.
13. The commentator states that the
construction costs for the renovation of
the Building were approximately $26
million dollars but that the fair market
of such Building will be approximately
$11 million upon completion.
In response, the applicant maintains
that the comment concerning the
decline in the value of the Building is
erroneous and misleading. In this
regard, it is represented that while the
purchase price and construction costs of
renovating the Building totaled over $26
million, the pro-rata allocation of those
costs to the Union’s condominium unit
is in the $11 million range, so the Union
did not suffer a $15 million loss, as
implied by the commentator.
After full consideration and review of
the entire record, including the written
comments filed by the applicant and by
the commentator, the Department has
determined to grant the exemption, as
amended, corrected, and clarified above.
Comments and responses submitted to
the Department by the applicant and
comments submitted by the
commentator have been included as part
of the public record of the exemption
application. Copies of these comments
and the responses thereto are posted on
the Department’s Web site at https://
www.dol.gov/ebsa. The complete
application file (L–11558), including all
supplemental submissions received by
the Department, is available for public
inspection in the Public Documents
Room of the Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N–1513, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption refer to the Notice published
on December 22, 2009, at 74 FR 68120.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8540. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33343
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which among other things
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to
and not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transactional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption
is subject to the express condition that
the material facts and representations
contained in the application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
June 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–14022 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Application Nos. and Proposed
Exemptions; D–11573, Citigroup
Global Markets, Inc. and Its Affiliates
(Together, CGMI or the Applicant); and
L–11624, Boston Carpenters
Apprenticeship and Training Fund (the
Fund), et al.
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
33344
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
SUMMARY: This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code).
Written Comments and Hearing
Requests
All interested persons are invited to
submit written comments or requests for
a hearing on the pending exemptions,
unless otherwise stated in the Notice of
Proposed Exemption, within 45 days
from the date of publication of this
Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1)
The name, address, and telephone
number of the person making the
comment or request, and (2) the nature
of the person’s interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person
would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must
also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the
evidence to be presented at the hearing.
All written comments and
requests for a hearing (at least three
copies) should be sent to the Employee
Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA), Office of Exemption
Determinations, Room N–5700, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Attention: Application No. ll, stated
in each Notice of Proposed Exemption.
Interested persons are also invited to
submit comments and/or hearing
requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX.
Any such comments or requests should
be sent either by e-mail to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written
comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or
confidential business information that
you do not want to be publiclydisclosed. All comments and hearing
requests are posted on the Internet
exactly as they are received, and they
can be retrieved by most Internet search
engines. The Department will make no
deletions, modifications or redactions to
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
the comments or hearing requests
received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR
32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain
representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the applications on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Its
Affiliates (Together, CGMI or the
Applicant) Located in New York, New
York
[Application No. D–11573]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act (or
ERISA) and section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, August
10, 1990).
Section I. Covered Transactions
A. If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of section 406(a) of the Act
and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A)
through (D) of the Code, shall not apply,
effective May 31, 2009, to the purchase
or redemption of shares by an employee
benefit plan, an individual retirement
account (an IRA), a retirement plan for
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
self-employed individuals (a Keogh
Plan), or an individual account pension
plan that is subject to the provisions of
Title I of the Act and established under
section 403(b) of the Code (the Section
403(b) Plan) (collectively, the Plans) in
the Trust for Consulting Group Capital
Markets Funds (the Trust), sponsored by
MSSB in connection with such Plans’
participation in the TRAK Personalized
Investment Advisory Service (the TRAK
Program).
B. If the exemption is granted, the
restrictions of section 406(b) of the Act
and the sanctions resulting from the
application of section 4975 of the Code,
by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(E) and
(F) of the Code, shall not apply, effective
May 31, 2009, with respect to the
provision of (i) investment advisory
services by the Adviser or (ii) an
automatic reallocation option as
described below (the Automatic
Reallocation Option) to an independent
fiduciary of a participating Plan (the
Independent Plan Fiduciary), which
may result in such fiduciary’s selection
of a portfolio (the Portfolio) 1 in the
TRAK Program for the investment of
Plan assets.
This exemption is subject to the
following conditions set forth below in
Section II.
Section II. General Conditions
(a) The participation of Plans in the
TRAK Program is
(b) approved by an Independent Plan
Fiduciary. For purposes of this
requirement, an employee, officer or
director of the Adviser and/or its
affiliates covered by an IRA not subject
to Title I of the Act will be considered
an Independent Plan Fiduciary with
respect to such IRA.
(c) The total fees paid to the Adviser
and its affiliates will constitute no more
than reasonable compensation.
(d) No Plan pays a fee or commission
by reason of the acquisition or
redemption of shares in the Trust.
(e) The terms of each purchase or
redemption of Trust shares remain at
least as favorable to an investing Plan as
those obtainable in an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated party.
(f) The Adviser provides written
documentation to an Independent Plan
Fiduciary of its recommendations or
evaluations based upon objective
criteria.
(g) Any recommendation or
evaluation made by the Adviser to an
1 For the avoidance of doubt, unless the context
suggests otherwise, the term ‘‘Portfolio’’ includes the
Stable Value Investments Fund, a collective trust
fund established and maintained by First State
Trust Company, formerly a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Citigroup.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
Independent Plan Fiduciary is
implemented only at the express
direction of such Independent Plan
Fiduciary, provided, however, that—
(1) If such Independent Plan
Fiduciary elects in writing (the
Election), on a form designated by the
Adviser from time to time for such
purpose, to participate in the Automatic
Reallocation Option under the TRAK
Program, the affected Plan or participant
account is automatically reallocated
whenever the Adviser modifies the
particular asset allocation
recommendation which the
Independent Plan Fiduciary has chosen.
Such Election continues in effect until
revoked or terminated by the
Independent Plan Fiduciary in writing.
(2) Except as set forth below in
paragraph II(f)(3), at the time of a change
in the Adviser’s asset allocation
recommendation, each account based
upon the asset allocation model (the
Allocation Model) affected by such
change is adjusted on the business day
of the release of the new Allocation
Model by the Adviser, except to the
extent that market conditions, and order
purchase and redemption procedures,
may delay such processing through a
series of purchase and redemption
transactions to shift assets among the
affected Portfolios.
(3) If the change in the Adviser’s asset
allocation recommendation exceeds an
increase or decrease of more than 10
percent in the absolute percentage
allocated to any one investment
medium (e.g., a suggested increase in a
15 percent allocation to greater than 25
percent, or a decrease of such 15 percent
allocation to less than 5 percent), the
Adviser sends out a written notice (the
Notice) to all Independent Plan
Fiduciaries whose current investment
allocation may be affected, describing
the proposed reallocation and the date
on which such allocation is to be
instituted (the Effective Date). If the
Independent Plan Fiduciary notifies the
Adviser, in writing, at any time within
the period of 30 calendar days prior to
the proposed Effective Date that such
fiduciary does not wish to follow such
revised asset allocation
recommendation, the Allocation Model
remains at the current level, or at such
other level as the Independent Plan
Fiduciary then expressly designated, in
writing. If the Independent Plan
Fiduciary does not affirmatively ‘opt
out’ of the new Adviser
recommendation, in writing, prior to the
proposed Effective Date, such new
recommendation is automatically
effected by a dollar-for-dollar
liquidation and purchase of the required
amounts in the respective account.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
(4) An Independent Plan Fiduciary
will receive a trade confirmation of each
reallocation transaction. In this regard,
for all Plan investors other than Section
404(c) Plan accounts (i.e., 401(k) Plan
accounts), CGMI or MSSB, as
applicable, mails trade confirmations on
the next business day after the
reallocation trades are executed. In the
case of Section 404(c) Plan participants,
notification depends upon the
notification provisions agreed to by the
Plan recordkeeper.
(h) The Adviser generally gives
investment advice in writing to an
Independent Plan Fiduciary with
respect to all available Portfolios.
However, in the case of a Plan providing
for participant-directed investments (the
Section 404(c) Plan), the Adviser
provides investment advice that is
limited to the Portfolios made available
under the Plan.
(i) Any sub-adviser (the Sub-Adviser)
that acts for the Trust to exercise
investment discretion over a Portfolio is
independent of Morgan Stanley, Inc.
(Morgan Stanley), CGMI, MSSB and
their respective affiliates (collectively,
the Affiliated Entities).
(j) Immediately following the
acquisition by a Portfolio of any
securities that are issued by any
Affiliated Entity, such as Citigroup or
Morgan Stanley common stock (the
Adviser Common Stock), the percentage
of that Portfolio’s net assets invested in
such securities will not exceed one
percent. However, this percentage
limitation may be exceeded if—
(1) The amount held by a Sub-Adviser
in managing a Portfolio is held in order
to replicate an established third-party
index (the Index).
(2) The Index represents the
investment performance of a specific
segment of the public market for equity
securities in the United States and/or
foreign countries. The organization
creating the Index is:
(i) Engaged in the business of
providing financial information;
(ii) A publisher of financial news
information; or
(iii) A public stock exchange or
association of securities dealers.
The Index is created and maintained
by an organization independent of the
Affiliated Entities and is a generallyaccepted standardized Index of
securities which is not specifically
tailored for use by the Affiliated
Entities.
(3) The acquisition or disposition of
Adviser Common Stock does not
include any agreement, arrangement or
understanding regarding the design or
operation of the Portfolio acquiring such
Adviser Common Stock, which is
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33345
intended to benefit the Affiliated
Entities or any party in which any of the
Affiliated Entities may have an interest.
(4) The Independent Plan Fiduciary
authorizes the investment of a Plan’s
assets in an Index Fund which
purchases and/or holds the Adviser
Common Stock and the Sub-Adviser is
responsible for voting any shares of
Adviser Common Stock that are held by
an Index Fund on any matter in which
shareholders of Adviser Common Stock
are required or permitted to vote.
(k) The quarterly investment advisory
fee that is paid by a Plan to the Adviser
for investment advisory services
rendered to such Plan is offset by any
amount in excess of 20 basis points that
MSSB retains from any Portfolio (with
the exception of the Money Market
Investments Portfolio and the Stable
Value Investments Portfolio for which
neither MSSB nor the Trust will retain
any investment management fee) which
contains investments attributable to the
Plan investor.
(l) With respect to its participation in
the TRAK Program prior to purchasing
Trust shares,
(1) Each Plan receives the following
written or oral disclosures from the
Adviser:
(A) A copy of the Prospectus for the
Trust discussing the investment
objectives of the Portfolios comprising
the Trust, the policies employed to
achieve these objectives, the corporate
affiliation existing among the Adviser
and its affiliates, and the compensation
paid to such entities.2
(B) Upon written or oral request to the
Adviser, a Statement of Additional
Information supplementing the
Prospectus which describes the types of
securities and other instruments in
which the Portfolios may invest, the
investment policies and strategies that
the Portfolios may utilize and certain
risks attendant to those investments,
policies and strategies.
(C) A copy of the investment advisory
agreement between the Adviser and
such Plan which relates to participation
in the TRAK Program and describes the
Automatic Reallocation Option.
(D) Upon written request of the
Adviser, a copy of the respective
investment advisory agreement between
MSSB and the Sub-Advisers.
2 The fact that certain transactions and fee
arrangements are the subject of an administrative
exemption does not relieve the Independent Plan
Fiduciary from the general fiduciary responsibility
provisions of section 404 of the Act. In this regard,
the Department expects the Independent Plan
Fiduciary to consider carefully the totality of the
fees and expenses to be paid by the Plan, including
any fees paid directly to MSSB, CGMI or to other
third parties.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
33346
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
(E) In the case of a Section 404(c)
Plan, if required by the arrangement
negotiated between the Adviser and the
Plan, an explanation by an Adviser
representative (the Financial Advisor) to
eligible participants in such Plan, of the
services offered under the TRAK
Program and the operation and
objectives of the Portfolios.
(F) A copy of the proposed exemption
and the final exemption pertaining to
the exemptive relief described herein.
(2) If accepted as an investor in the
TRAK Program, an Independent Plan
Fiduciary of an IRA or Keogh Plan is
required to acknowledge, in writing,
prior to purchasing Trust shares that
such fiduciary has received copies of
the documents described above in
subparagraph (k)(1) of this section.
(3) With respect to a Section 404(c)
Plan, written acknowledgement of the
receipt of such documents is provided
by the Independent Plan Fiduciary (i.e.,
the Plan administrator, trustee or named
fiduciary, as the recordholder of Trust
shares). Such Independent Plan
Fiduciary is required to represent in
writing to the Adviser that such
fiduciary is (a) independent of the
Affiliated Entities and (b)
knowledgeable with respect to the Plan
in administrative matters and funding
matters related thereto, and able to make
an informed decision concerning
participation in the TRAK Program.
(4) With respect to a Plan that is
covered under Title I of the Act, where
investment decisions are made by a
trustee, investment manager or a named
fiduciary, such Independent Plan
Fiduciary is required to acknowledge, in
writing, receipt of such documents and
represent to the Adviser that such
fiduciary is (a) independent of the
Affiliated Entities, (b) capable of making
an independent decision regarding the
investment of Plan assets and (c)
knowledgeable with respect to the Plan
in administrative matters and funding
matters related thereto, and able to make
an informed decision concerning
participation in the TRAK Program.
(m) Subsequent to its participation in
the TRAK Program, each Plan receives
the following written or oral disclosures
with respect to its ongoing participation
in the TRAK Program:
(1) The Trust’s semi-annual and
annual report including a financial
statement for the Trust and investment
management fees paid by each Portfolio.
(2) A written quarterly monitoring
statement containing an analysis and an
evaluation of a Plan investor’s account
to ascertain whether the Plan’s
investment objectives have been met
and recommending, if required, changes
in Portfolio allocations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
(3) If required by the arrangement
negotiated between the Adviser and a
Section 404(c) Plan, a quarterly, detailed
investment performance monitoring
report, in writing, provided to an
Independent Plan Fiduciary of such
Plan showing Plan level asset
allocations, Plan cash flow analysis and
annualized risk adjusted rates of return
for Plan investments. In addition, if
required by such arrangement, Financial
Advisors meet periodically with
Independent Plan Fiduciaries of Section
404(c) Plans to discuss the report as
well as with eligible participants to
review their accounts’ performance.
(4) If required by the arrangement
negotiated between the Adviser and a
Section 404(c) Plan, a quarterly
participant performance monitoring
report provided to a Plan participant
which accompanies the participant’s
benefit statement and describes the
investment performance of the
Portfolios, the investment performance
of the participant’s individual
investment in the TRAK Program, and
gives market commentary and toll-free
numbers that enable the participant to
obtain more information about the
TRAK Program or to amend his or her
investment allocations.
(5) On a quarterly and annual basis,
written disclosures to all Plans of (a) the
percentage of each Portfolio’s brokerage
commissions that are paid to the
Affiliated Entities and (b) the average
brokerage commission per share paid by
each Portfolio to the Affiliated Entities,
as compared to the average brokerage
commission per share paid by the Trust
to brokers other than the Affiliated
Entities, both expressed as cents per
share.
(n) The Adviser maintains or causes
to be maintained, for a period of (6) six
years, the records necessary to enable
the persons described in paragraph
(m)(1) of this section to determine
whether the applicable conditions of
this exemption have been met. Such
records are readily available to assure
accessibility by the persons identified in
paragraph (1) of this section.
(1) Notwithstanding any provisions of
section 504(a)(2) and (b) of the Act, the
records referred to in the first paragraph
of this section are unconditionally
available at their customary location for
examination during normal business
hours by—
(i) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department or the
Internal Revenue Service;
(ii) Any fiduciary of a participating
Plan or any duly authorized
representative of such fiduciary;
(iii) Any contributing employer to any
participating Plan or any duly
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
authorized employee representative of
such employer; and
(iv) Any participant or beneficiary of
any participating Plan, or any duly
authorized representative of such
participant or beneficiary.
(2) A prohibited transaction is not
deemed to have occurred if, due to
circumstances beyond the control of the
Adviser, the records are lost or
destroyed prior to the end of the sixyear period, and no party in interest
other than the Adviser is subject to the
civil penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes
imposed by sections 4975(a) and (b) of
the Code if the records are not
maintained or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph
(1) of this section.
(3) None of the persons described in
subparagraphs (ii)–(iv) of this section
(m)(1) is authorized to examine the
trade secrets of the Adviser or
commercial or financial information
which is privileged or confidential.
(4) Should the Adviser refuse to
disclose information on the basis that
such information is exempt from
disclosure, the Adviser shall, by the
close of the thirtieth (30th) day
following the request, provide written
notice advising that person of the reason
for the refusal and that the Department
may request such information.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this proposed
exemption:
(a) The term ‘‘Adviser’’ means CGMI
or MSSB as investment adviser to Plans.
(b) The term ‘‘Affiliated Entities’’
means Morgan Stanley, CGMI, MSSB
and their respective affiliates.
(c) The term ‘‘CGMI’’ means Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. and any affiliate of
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
(d) An ‘‘affiliate’’ of any of the
Affiliated Entities includes:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Affiliated
Entity. (For purposes of this
subparagraph, the term ‘‘control’’ means
the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual);
(2) Any individual who is an officer
(as defined in Section III(g) hereof),
director or partner in the Affiliated
Entity or a person described in
subparagraph (d)(1);
(3) Any corporation or partnership of
which the Affiliated Entity, or an
affiliate described in subparagraph
(d)(1), is a 10 percent or more partner
or owner; and
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
(4) Any corporation or partnership of
which any individual which is an
officer or director of the Affiliated Entity
is a 10 percent or more partner or
owner.
(e) An ‘‘Independent Plan Fiduciary’’
is a Plan fiduciary which is independent
of the Affiliated Entities and is either:
(1) A Plan administrator, sponsor,
trustee or named fiduciary, as the
recordholder of Trust shares under a
Section 404(c) Plan;
(2) A participant in a Keogh Plan;
(3) An individual covered under (i) a
self-directed IRA or (ii) a Section 403(b)
Plan, which invests in Trust shares;
(4) A trustee, investment manager or
named fiduciary responsible for
investment decisions in the case of a
Title I Plan that does not permit
individual direction as contemplated by
Section 404(c) of the Act; or
(5) A participant in a Plan, such as a
Section 404(c) Plan, who is permitted
under the terms of such Plan to direct,
and who elects to direct, the investment
of assets of his or her account in such
Plan.
(f) The term ‘‘MSSB’’ means Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC,
together with its subsidiaries.
(g) The term ‘‘officer’’ means a
president, any vice president in charge
of a principal business unit, division or
function (such as sales, administration
or finance), or any other officer who
performs a policymaking function for
the entity.
Section IV. Effective Date
If granted, this proposed exemption
will be effective as of May 31, 2009 with
respect to the Covered Transactions, the
General Conditions and the Definitions
that are described in Sections I, II and
III.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. If granted, the proposed individual
exemption described herein would
replace Prohibited Transaction
Exemption (PTE) 2009–12 (74 FR 13231,
March 26, 2009), an exemption
previously granted to CGMI. PTE 2009–
12 relates to the operation of the TRAK
Personalized Investment Advisory
Service (the TRAK Program) and the
Trust for Consulting Group Capital
Markets Funds (the Trust).
PTE 2009–12 provides exemptive
relief from section 406(a) of the Act and
section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the
Code, for the purchase or redemption of
shares by various types of Plans, such as
ERISA Title I Plans, IRAs, Keogh Plans,
and Section 403(b) Plans, whose assets
are invested in the Trust that was
previously established by Citigroup in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
connection with such Plans’
participation in the TRAK Program.
PTE 2009–12 also provides exemptive
relief from section 406(b) of the Act and
section 4975(c)(1)(E) and (F) of the
Code, with respect to the provision, by
Citigroup’s Consulting Group, of (i)
investment advisory services or (ii) an
Automatic Reallocation Option to an
independent fiduciary of a participating
Plan (i.e., the Independent Plan
Fiduciary), which may result in such
fiduciary’s selection of a Portfolio 3 in
the TRAK Program for the investment of
Plan assets.
2. The Department originally granted
to Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. PTE
92–77, which relates to a less evolved
form of the TRAK Program.4 PTE 92–77
was superseded by PTE 94–50, which
allowed Smith, Barney Inc. (Smith
Barney), the predecessor to Salomon
Smith Barney Inc. (Salomon Smith
Barney), to add a daily-traded collective
investment fund (the GIC Fund) to the
existing fund Portfolios, describe the
various entities operating the GIC Fund,
and replace references to Shearson
Lehman with Smith Barney.5 PTE 99–
15, which superseded PTE 94–50,
allowed Salomon Smith Barney to
create a broader distribution of TRAKrelated products, implement a recordkeeping reimbursement offset procedure
under the TRAK Program, adopt the
Automated Reallocation Option under
the TRAK Program that would reduce
the asset allocation fee paid to Salomon
Smith Barney by a Plan investor, and
expand the scope of the exemption to
include Section 403(b) Plans.6
3. Thereafter, PTE 99–15 was replaced
by PTE 2000–45, which primarily
modified the definition of an ‘‘affiliate’’
of Salomon Smith Barney so that it only
covered persons or entities that had a
significant role in the decisions made
by, or which were managed or
influenced by, Salomon Smith Barney,
or included any corporation or
partnership of which Salomon Smith
Barney or an affiliate was a 10 percent
or more partner or owner.7
4. Finally, on March 26, 2009, the
Department granted PTE 2009–12. As
the result of a merger transaction (the
Merger Transaction) between Citigroup
and Legg Mason, Inc. (Legg Mason), on
December 1, 2005, an affiliate of
3 For the avoidance of doubt, unless the context
suggests otherwise, the term ‘‘Portfolio’’ includes the
Stable Value Investments Fund, a collective trust
fund established and maintained by First State
Trust Company (First State), formerly a whollyowned subsidiary of Citigroup.
4 57 FR 45833 (October 5, 1992).
5 59 FR 32024 (June 21, 1994).
6 64 FR 1648 (April 5, 1999).
7 65 FR 54315 (September 7, 2000).
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33347
Citigroup acquired an approximately
14% equity ownership interest in Legg
Mason common and preferred stock.
This meant that two investment adviser
subsidiaries of Legg Mason (Brandywine
Asset Management LLC and Western
Asset Management Company), which
were sub-advisers (the Sub-Advisers) to
three Trust Portfolios under the TRAK
Program, were no longer considered
‘‘independent’’ of Citigroup and its
affiliates in violation of Section II(h) of
the General Conditions.8 Also, the SubAdvisers were considered ‘‘affiliates’’ of
Citigroup under Section III(b)(3) of the
General Definitions of PTE 2000–45
inasmuch as Citigroup became a 10% or
more indirect owner of each SubAdviser following the Merger
Transaction.
5. Although Citigroup reduced its
ownership interest in Legg Mason to
under the 10% ownership threshold on
March 10, 2006, the Department
decided that PTE 2000–45 was no
longer effective for the transactions
described therein, because Section II(h)
of the General Conditions and Section
III(b) of the Definitions were not met.
Therefore, the Department granted PTE
2009–12, a new exemption, which
replaced PTE 2000–45. Unless
otherwise noted, PTE 2009–12
incorporates by reference the facts,
representations, operative language and
definitions of PTE 2000–45. In addition,
PTE 2009–12 updates the operative
language of PTE 2000–45. Further, PTE
2009–12 provides a temporary and
limited exception to the definition of
the term ‘‘affiliate,’’ so that during the
three month period of time within
which Citigroup held a 10% or greater
economic ownership interest in Legg
Mason, the Sub-Advisers would
continue to be considered
‘‘independent’’ of CGMI and its affiliates
for purposes of Section II(h) and not
‘‘affiliated’’ with CGMI and its affiliates
for purposes of Section III(b) of the
exemption. Finally, PTE 2009–12
provides exemptive relief for a new
method to compute fee offsets that are
required under the exemption to
mitigate past anomalies.
PTE 2009–12 is effective from
December 1, 2005 until March 10, 2006,
with respect to the limited exception. It
is also effective as of December 1, 2005
with respect to the transactions covered
by the exemption, the General
Conditions, and the Definitions.
Further, PTE 2009–12 is effective as of
8 In PTE 2000–45, Section II(h) of the General
Conditions provided that ‘‘Any sub-adviser (the
Sub-Adviser) that acts for the Trust to exercise
investment discretion over a Portfolio will be
independent of Salomon Smith Barney and its
affiliates.’’
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
33348
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
January 1, 2008, with respect to the new
fee offset procedure.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Replacement of PTE 2009–12
6. CGMI and its predecessors and
current and future affiliates and Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC and its
current and future affiliates
(collectively, the Applicants) have
requested a new exemption that would
replace PTE 2009–12 to reflect the terms
of a joint venture transaction (the Joint
Venture Transaction) between Citigroup
and Morgan Stanley, Inc. (Morgan
Stanley) that occurred on May 31, 2009.
As a result of the Joint Venture
Transaction, which is described in
detail below, the Applicants state that
the exemptive relief provided under
PTE 2009–12 is no longer effective due
to a change in the parties and the
ownership structure of the TRAK
Program. Therefore, the Applicants
request a new exemption that would
replace PTE 2009–12. If granted, the
new exemption would be made
retroactive to May 31, 2009 and it would
provide the same relief with respect to
the transactions covered under PTE
2009–12. In addition, the General
Conditions and Definitions of the new
exemption would be similar to those as
set forth in PTE 2009–12.
The Joint Venture Transaction
7. The Applicants represent that on
January 13, 2009, Citigroup and Morgan
Stanley entered into a ‘‘Joint Venture
Contribution and Formation Agreement’’
(the Joint Venture Agreement), which
established the terms of a new joint
venture (the Joint Venture) between
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley.
Citigroup and Morgan Stanley are global
financial services providers, each
headquartered in New York, New York.
As of the end of 2008, Citigroup
reported total client assets under
management as approximately $1.3
trillion. Citigroup’s current employee
workforce consists of approximately
300,000 individuals in approximately
16,000 offices in 140 countries around
the world. As of the end of 2008,
Morgan Stanley reported total client
assets under management as
approximately $546 billion. Its current
employee workforce of approximately
60,000 serves a diversified group of
corporations, governments, financial
institutions, and individuals, and
operates from over 1,200 offices in over
36 countries around the world.
8. Under the Joint Venture Agreement,
each of Citigroup and Morgan Stanley
(including their respective subsidiaries)
agreed to contribute specified
businesses into the Joint Venture,
together with all contracts, employees,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
property licenses and other assets (as
well as liabilities) used primarily in the
contributed businesses. Generally, in
the case of Citigroup, the contributed
businesses included Citigroup’s retail
brokerage and futures business operated
under the name ‘‘Smith Barney’’ in the
United States and Australia and
operated under the name ‘‘Quilter’’ in
the United Kingdom, Ireland and
Channel Islands. Certain investment
advisory and other businesses of
Citigroup were also contributed,
including Citigroup’s Consulting Group
and the sponsorship of the TRAK
Program. In the case of Morgan Stanley,
the contributed businesses consisted
generally of Morgan Stanley’s global
wealth management (retail brokerage)
and private wealth management
businesses. According to the
Applicants, no valuations for the
contributed businesses were agreed
upon between the parties. It was agreed,
however, that the value of the Smith
Barney business plus $2.75 billion
would equal an ownership percentage of
49% of the Joint Venture entity, Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC
(Holdings), a Delaware limited liability
company (together with its subsidiaries,
MSSB). The closing date of the Joint
Venture Transaction occurred on May
31, 2009 (the Closing).
Prior to the Closing, Morgan Stanley
had formed Holdings, the sole member
of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC,
which conducts most of the Joint
Venture’s domestic operations as a dualregistered broker-dealer and investment
adviser. Holdings presently generates
about $14 billion in net revenues. It has
18,500 financial advisers, 1,000
locations worldwide and services about
6.8 million households.
Immediately following the Closing,
Morgan Stanley owned indirectly
through subsidiaries 51% of Holdings,
and Citigroup owned 49% of Holdings,
through CGMI. Morgan Stanley has call
rights to purchase from Citigroup (a) an
additional 14% of Holdings after the
third anniversary of Closing, (b) an
additional 15% of Holdings after the
fourth anniversary and (c) the balance of
Citigroup’s interest in Holdings after the
fifth anniversary.9
9. The Joint Venture Agreement was
amended and restated on May 29, 2009
9 The
Applicants believe that Citgroup’s
ownership interest in MSSB will reach a point
where it will no longer have an interest in MSSB
or the Trust that could affect its best judgment as
a fiduciary. The Applicants explain that at such
point in time, it will no longer be necessary for
Citigroup to rely on this exemption for the TRAK
Program. The Department expresses no opinion on
when it will no longer be necessary for Citigroup
to rely on this exemption, given that this will be
a facts and circumstances determination.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(the Amended Contribution Agreement).
Under the Amended Contribution
Agreement, Citigroup transferred its
managed futures business and its
proprietary investments to MSSB on
July 31, 2009, in exchange for a cash
payment of $299.778 million paid by
Morgan Stanley, and Morgan Stanley
purchased additional interests in MSSB
worth approximately $2.7 billion on
August 1, 2009, in order to maintain its
total percentage of ownership interests
in MSSB at 51%. The Amended
Contribution Agreement also provided
for an ‘‘introducing broker’’ structure for
a period of time after the Closing. Under
the ‘‘introducing broker’’ structure,
clients of Morgan Stanley’s legacy
businesses continue to have their
brokerage transactions cleared through,
and their accounts custodied and
carried by, Morgan Stanley.10 Similarly,
customers of the Citigroup legacy
businesses continue to have their
brokerage transactions cleared through,
and have their accounts custodied and
carried by, CGMI.11 Over time, it is
expected that the contributed businesses
and operations of Morgan Stanley and
Citigroup will be integrated into one
operation and that ultimately, MSSB
will become a fully self-clearing and
self-custody service firm and will carry
its own customer accounts.
Current Status of Operations
10. Since the Closing, MSSB’s
advisory services are being provided
through two distribution channels. One
distribution channel generally sponsors
the advisory programs, including the
TRAK Program, previously sponsored
by Smith Barney and/or CGMI (the SB
Channel). Therefore, since the Closing,
the TRAK Program has continued to be
made available to customers of the SB
Channel. The other distribution channel
generally sponsors the advisory
programs previously sponsored by
Morgan Stanley’s Global Wealth
Management Group (the MS Channel).
As stated previously, the parties’
ultimate goal is for the businesses,
operations and systems of the MS
Channel and the SB Channel to be
integrated. However, decisions as to
which programs will be offered to
10 Morgan Stanley continues to provide an array
of services for these accounts which include
clearing and settling securities transactions,
providing trade confirmations and customer
statements and performing certain cashiering
functions, custody services and other related
services.
11 CGMI clears and settles securities transactions,
provides trade confirmations and customer
statements and performs certain cashiering
functions, custody services and other related
services for these accounts.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
whom or which programs will survive
over the long-term have not been made.
11. Also, since the Closing, CGMI has
continued to offer the TRAK Program to
its retained clients. As of August 31,
2009, the TRAK Program had assets in
excess of $6.13 billion, over $3.74
billion of which is held in Plan
accounts. At present, the investments
under the TRAK Program encompass
the Trust, which consists of eleven
Portfolios, as well as the Stable Value
Investments Fund, a collective trust
fund established and maintained by
First State. The Trust and the Stable
Value Investment Fund are advised by
one or more unaffiliated Sub-Advisers
selected by MSSB and First State,
respectively. In addition to the TRAK
Program, CGMI offers other investment
advisory programs to its retained clients
under an advisory services agreement
between Citigroup and Holdings dated
as of the Closing. Under the agreement,
Holdings provides a wide range of
investment advisory services to
Citigroup advisory programs pursuant to
a delegation by Citigroup to Holdings of
certain of Citigroup’s obligations to
provide such services. Citigroup
retained clients were provided notice of
this arrangement.
Descriptions of Revisions to the
Operative Language of PTE 2009–12
12. The proposed exemption generally
modifies the operative language of PTE
2009–12 to take into account the new
ownership structure of the TRAK
Program formed as a result of the Joint
Venture Transaction. Section I of PTE
2009–12 has been modified to conform
the effective date of the proposal with
the closing of the Joint Venture
Transaction, May 31, 2009. In addition,
the operative language in Section I(A)
and I(B) has been revised to provide
that, as a result of the Joint Venture,
MSSB rather than Citigroup is now the
sponsor of the Trust in connection with
Plans’ investment in the TRAK Program,
and that investment advisory services
may be provided by MSSB in addition
to CGMI, respectively.
13. Section II of PTE 2009–12, General
Conditions, has been modified
throughout by replacing the terms
‘‘CGMI,’’ ‘‘Consulting Group,’’ or
‘‘Citigroup,’’ with the term ‘‘Adviser,’’
which has been added as a new defined
term in Section III to mean ‘‘CGMI or
MSSB as investment adviser to Plans.’’
The changes were made to these terms
in order to reflect the addition of MSSB
as a sponsor of the TRAK Program
resulting from the Joint Venture
Transaction. In addition, in Section
II(h), the term ‘‘Affiliated Entities,’’
which has been added as a new defined
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
term in Section III to mean ‘‘Morgan
Stanley, CGMI, MSSB, and their
respective affiliates,’’ has been added to
take into account the addition of MSSB
as a sponsor of the TRAK Program.
14. Section II(j) of PTE 2009–12 has
been modified to reflect the fact that
CGMI has been removed from the
reallocation formula because it no
longer manages and supervises the Trust
and the Portfolios. Prior to the Closing,
Citigroup Investment Advisory Services
LLC (CIAS), an affiliate of CGMI,
managed and supervised the Trust and
Portfolios. In connection with the Joint
Venture Transactions, CIAS was
contributed to MSSB and as an affiliate
of MSSB, it manages and supervises the
Trust and the Portfolios. Thus, the
modifications to the language in Section
II(j) seek to clarify the parties to the
covered transactions, but do not change
the formula for the calculation of the
quarterly investment advisory fee that is
paid by the Plan to the Adviser.
Furthermore, Section II(j) has been
amended to correct the names of the
Portfolios that are excluded from the
calculation of the quarterly investment
advisory fee, namely by substituting the
term ‘‘Money Markets Investment
Portfolio’’ for ‘‘Government Money
Investments Portfolio,’’ and the term
‘‘Stable Value Investments Portfolio’’ for
‘‘GIC Fund.’’
15. Section III of PTE 2009–12, which
sets forth the Definitions, has been
modified by: (i) Adding Section III(a),
Adviser, to mean ‘‘CGMI or MSSB as
investment adviser to Plans’’ to reflect
the new sponsorship of the TRAK
Program by MSSB, in addition to the
previous sponsorship by CGMI; (ii)
adding Section III(b), Affiliated Entities,
to mean ‘‘Morgan Stanley, CGMI, MSSB
and their respective affiliates’’ to reflect
the addition of MSSB as a sponsor of the
TRAK Program resulting from the Joint
Venture Transaction; (iii) substituting
the term ‘‘Affiliated Entities’’ for ‘‘CGMI’’
throughout Section III(d) in order to
broaden the scope of the term ‘‘affiliate’’
to capture the current affiliates of the
Applicants; (iv) amending the sectional
references in Sections III(d)(2) and (3) to
conform to the corresponding
modifications to Section III; (v)
amending the definition of
‘‘Independent Plan Fiduciary’’ in Section
III(e) so that the Independent Plan
Fiduciary is independent of MSSB in
addition to CGMI and their respective
affiliates, thereby preserving the
purpose of the provisions in PTE 2009–
12 that provide that only a party
independent of the Applicants is
exercising discretion with respect to,
among other things, Plans’ decisions to
invest in the TRAK Program; and (vi)
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33349
adding a new definition of ‘‘MSSB’’ in
Section III(f) to mean ‘‘Morgan Stanley
Smith Barney Holdings LLC, together
with its affiliates.’’
16. Section IV of PTE 2009–12,
pertaining to exemptive relief for the
temporary and limited exception to the
definition of the term ‘‘affiliate,’’ has
been stricken since it is no longer
applicable. Previously, Section IV
provided that, during the three month
period of time within which Citigroup
held a 10% or greater economic
ownership interest in Legg Mason, the
Sub-Advisers would continue to be
considered ‘‘independent’’ of CGMI and
its affiliates for purposes of Section II(h)
and not ‘‘affiliated’’ with CGMI and its
affiliates for purposes of Section III(b) of
the exemption. Because the time period
has expired, Section IV is no longer
relevant to the exemption.
Finally, the Effective Date in new
Section IV is modified to provide that
the exemption, if granted, will be
effective as of May 31, 2009, which is
the closing date of the Joint Venture
Transaction.
Summary
17. In summary, the Applicant
represents that the transactions
described herein have satisfied or will
satisfy the statutory criteria for an
exemption set forth in section 408(a) of
the Act because:
(a) The participation of Plans in the
TRAK Program has been approved or
will be approved by an Independent
Plan Fiduciary;
(b) The total fees paid to the Adviser
and its affiliates has constituted or will
constitute no more than reasonable
compensation;
(c) No Plan has paid or will pay a fee
or commission by reason of the
acquisition or redemption of shares in
the Trust;
(d) The terms of each purchase or
redemption of Trust shares have
remained or will remain at least as
favorable to an investing Plan as those
obtainable in an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated party;
(e) The Adviser has provided or will
provide written documentation to an
Independent Plan Fiduciary of its
recommendations or evaluations based
upon objective criteria, and such
recommendation or evaluation has been
implemented or will be implemented
only at the express direction of such
Independent Plan Fiduciary.
(f) The Adviser has given or will give
investment advice in writing to an
Independent Plan Fiduciary with
respect to all available Portfolios (with
respect to participant directed plans,
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
33350
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
such advice is limited to the Portfolios
made available under the Plan);
(g) Any Sub-Adviser that acts for the
Trust to exercise investment discretion
over a Portfolio has been independent or
will be independent of Morgan Stanley,
CGMI, MSSB and their respective
affiliates;
(h) Immediately following the
acquisition by a Portfolio of Adviser
Common Stock, the percentage of that
Portfolio’s net assets invested in such
securities generally has not exceeded or
will not exceed one percent;
(i) The quarterly investment advisory
fee that is paid by a Plan to the Adviser
for investment advisory services
rendered to such Plan has been offset or
will be offset by any amount in excess
of 20 basis points that MSSB retains
from any Portfolio (with the exception
of the Money Market Investments
Portfolio and the Stable Value
Investments Portfolio for which neither
MSSB nor the Trust will retain any
investment management fee) which
contains investments attributable to the
Plan investor;
(j) With respect to its participation in
the TRAK Program, prior to purchasing
Trust shares, each Plan has received or
will receive written or oral disclosures
and offering materials from the Adviser
which generally disclose all material
facts concerning the purpose, structure,
operation, and investment in the TRAK
Program, and describe the Adviser’s
recommendations or evaluations,
including the reasons and objective
criteria forming the basis for such
recommendations or evaluations;
(k) Subsequent to its participation in
the TRAK Program, each Plan has
received or will receive periodic written
disclosures from the Adviser with
respect to the financial condition of the
TRAK Program, the total fees that it and
its affiliates will receive from such Plans
and the value of the Plan’s interest in
the TRAK Program, and on a quarterly
and annual basis, written disclosures to
all Plans of (a) the percentage of each
Portfolio’s brokerage commissions that
are paid to the Affiliated Entities and (b)
the average brokerage commission per
share paid by each Portfolio to the
Affiliated Entities, as compared to the
average brokerage commission per share
paid by the Trust to brokers other than
the Affiliated Entities, both expressed as
cents per share; and
(l) The Adviser has complied with,
and will continue to comply with, the
recordkeeping requirements provided in
Section II(m) of the proposed
exemption, for so long as such records
are required to be maintained.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption
will be mailed by first class mail to the
Independent Plan Fiduciary of each
Plan currently participating in the
TRAK Program, or, in the case of a Plan
covered by Section 404(c) of the Act, to
the recordholder of the Trust shares.
Such notice will be given within 45
days of the publication of the notice of
pendency in the Federal Register. The
notice will contain a copy of the notice
of proposed exemption, as published in
the Federal Register, and a
supplemental statement, as required
pursuant to 29 CFR 2570.43(b)(2). The
supplemental statement will inform
interested persons of their right to
comment on and/or to request a hearing
with respect to the pending exemption.
Written comments and hearing requests
are due within 75 days of the
publication of the proposed exemption
in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Warren Blinder of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8553. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and
Training Fund (the Fund) Located in
Boston, Massachusetts
[Exemption Application No: L–11624]
Proposed Exemption
The Department of Labor is
considering granting an exemption
under the authority of section 408(a) of
the Act in accordance with procedures
set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart
B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10,
1990). If the proposed exemption is
granted, the restrictions of 406(b)(1),
and 406(b)(2) of the Act shall not apply
effective for the period from January 29,
2010, through June 30, 2010, to the lease
(the Lease) by the Fund from the
NERCC, LLC (the Building Corporation),
a party in interest with respect to the
Fund, of a condominium unit (the
Condo) in a building (the Building)
owned by the Building Corporation,
where the New England Regional
Council of Carpenters (the Union), also
a party in interest with respect to the
Fund, indirectly owns the only other
condominium unit in the Building;
provided that, at the time the
transaction was entered into, the
following conditions were satisfied:
(a) The proposed exemption is
conditioned upon satisfaction at all
times of the terms and conditions of this
exemption, and upon adherence to the
material facts and representations, as
described in this proposed exemption,
and, as set forth in application D–11624,
and in application D–11558, including
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
those representations that are required
by 29 CFR 2570.34 and 29 CFR 2570.35
of the Department’s regulations;
(b) prior to entering into the Lease, the
Fund sought legal advice from Aaron D.
Krakow, Esq. (Mr. Krakow), acting as
legal counsel on behalf of the Fund,
who advised the Fund that it was
permissible for the Fund to enter into a
short term lease with the Building
Corporation, and the Board of Trustees
of the Fund (the Board) relied on Mr.
Krakow’s advice;
(c) the Lease which is the subject of
this exemption and any other leasing
arrangement of the Condo between the
Fund and the Building Corporation and/
or the Union, if not terminated sooner,
shall terminate on the date that the
Fund closes on the purchase of the
Condo from the Building Corporation;
and the Fund shall have no obligation
to pay rent to the Union or to the
Building Corporation after the date of
such termination;
(d) before the Fund entered into the
Lease of the Condo, James F. Grosso,
Esq. (Mr. Grosso), of O’Reilly, Grosso &
Gross, PC, acting as attorney for the
Fund, assisted in the negotiation of the
terms of the Lease, reviewed and
approved the terms of such Lease to
ensure that such terms are at least as
favorable to the Fund as an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated party,
determined that such terms are fair and
reasonable, and selected an
independent, qualified appraiser to
determine the fair market rental value of
the Condo;
(e) Mr. Grosso is responsible
throughout the duration of the Lease for:
(i) Monitoring the rent payments made
by the Fund to ensure that such
payments are consistent with the
amount of rental specified under the
terms of such Lease, (ii) monitoring the
payments of the Fund’s share of the
expenses for taxes, insurance, and
operating expenses (including repairs)
to ensure that such payments represent
a fair apportionment of such expenses;
and (iii) determining that the Fund has
sufficient assets to pay the rental
amount and its portion of taxes,
insurance, and operating expenses
(including repairs);
(f) throughout the duration of the
Lease, the terms of the Lease of the
Condo between the Fund and the
Building Corporation are at all times
satisfied;
(g) the rent paid by the Fund for the
Condo under the terms of the Lease is
at no time greater than the fair market
rental value of the Condo, as determined
by an independent, qualified appraiser
selected by Mr. Grosso;
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
(h) under the provisions of the Lease,
the subject transaction is on terms and
at all times remains on terms that are at
least as favorable to the Fund as those
that would have been negotiated under
similar circumstances at arm’s length
with an unrelated third party;
(i) the transaction is appropriate and
helpful in carrying out the purposes for
which the Fund is established or
maintained;
(j) the Board maintains, or causes to
be maintained within the United States
for a period of six (6) years in a manner
that is convenient and accessible for
audit and examination, such records as
are necessary to enable the persons
described, below, in paragraph (k)(1) of
this exemption to determine whether
the conditions of this exemption have
been met; except that—
(1) if the records necessary to enable
the persons described, below, in
paragraph (k)(1) of this exemption to
determine whether the conditions of
this exemption have been met are lost
or destroyed, due to circumstances
beyond the control of the Board, then no
prohibited transaction will be
considered to have occurred solely on
the basis of the unavailability of those
records; and
(2) No party in interest, other than the
Board shall be subject to the civil
penalty that may be assessed under
section 502(i) of the Act, or to the taxes
imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of
the Code, if the records are not
maintained, or are not available for
examination as required by paragraph (j)
of this exemption; and
(k)(1) Except as provided, below, in
paragraph (k)(2) of this exemption and
notwithstanding any provisions of
sections (a)(2) and (b) of section 504 of
the Act, the records referred to in
paragraph (j) of this exemption are
unconditionally available at their
customary location for examination
during normal business hours by:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or
representative of the Department, the
Internal Revenue Service, or any other
applicable federal or state regulatory
agency;
(B) Any fiduciary of the Fund, or any
duly authorized representative of such
fiduciary;
(C) Any contributing employer to the
Fund and any employee organization
whose members are covered by the
Fund, or any duly authorized employee
or representative of these entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
the Fund, or any duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described,
above, in paragraph (k)(1)(B)–(D) of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
exemption are authorized to examine
trade secrets or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or
confidential.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Union is a labor organization
made up of thirty (30) local carpenter
unions in six (6) New England states.
The local unions that are affiliated with
the Union include local union nos. 33,
40, 67, 218, and 723 (the Locals).
Members of the Union are covered by
the Fund. The Union and the Locals are
parties in interest with respect to the
Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(D) of
the Act, as employee organizations any
of whose members are covered by such
Fund.
2. The Fund is an employee welfare
benefit plan, as that term is defined in
the Act. Further, the Fund is a
multiemployer apprenticeship and
training fund. The Fund is a
Massachusetts nonprofit organization,
and is exempt from income taxes under
the provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code.
3. The Fund provides training and
education to carpenter apprentices in
the greater Boston area. The Fund also
provides training and education to
journeymen carpenters in the greater
Boston area.
4. The Fund is maintained under
collective bargaining agreements
negotiated between the Union of the
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and
Joiners of America (the UBCJA) and the
following multiemployer bargaining
organizations: (a) The Labor Relations
Division of the Associated General
Contractors of Massachusetts, Inc.; (b)
The Building Trades Employers’
Association of Boston and Eastern
Massachusetts, Inc.; and (c) The Labor
Relations Division of the Construction
Industry of Massachusetts (collectively,
the Employer Associations). Employers
any of whose employees are covered by
the Fund, are parties in interest with
respect to the Fund, pursuant to section
3(14)(C) of the Act. The UBCJA is a
party in interest with respect to the
Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(D) of
the Act, as an employee organization
any of whose members are covered by
such Fund.
5. The Board has the authority to
invest the assets of the Fund. The Board
and the members of the Board, as
persons who have investment discretion
over the assets of the Fund, are
fiduciaries with respect to the Fund,
pursuant to section 3(21)(A) of the Act.
As a fiduciaries of the Fund, the Board
and the members of the Board are also
parties in interest with respect to such
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33351
Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(A) of
the Act.
The Board consists of six (6) labor
representatives and six (6) management
representatives. Among the labor
representatives serving on the Board are
Joseph Power (Mr. Power), Thomas
Flynn, Steve Tewksbury, Charles
MacFarlane, Richard Pedi (Mr. Pedi),
and Richard Scaramozza. All of the
labor representatives on the Board are
Union employees and members of
various locals affiliated with the Union.
Mr. Power, one of the labor
representatives on the Board, also serves
on the Executive Board of the Union.
The representatives of management
serving on the Board are Donald
MacKinnon (Mr. MacKinnon), Tom
Gunning, III, George Allen (Mr. Allen),
William Fitzgerald, Christopher Pennie,
and Mark DeNapoli (Mr. DeNapoli).
It is represented that the Board, and
more specifically the Finance
Committee of the Board, each meet
monthly, and at those meetings review
the Fund’s finances for the month,
including the Fund’s payments to the
Union for rent and for the Fund’s share
of taxes, insurance, and operating
expenses (including repairs) in
connection with the Lease of the Condo
to the Fund.
6. In the fiscal year ending September
30, 2008, the Fund received employer
contributions of $2,584,069, based on
approximately 6.7 million hours of
work. In addition, the Fund received
other income of approximately
$189,000. As of September 30, 2008, the
Fund had expenses of $2,254,078 and
total assets of $5,910,043. Included in
the Fund’s total assets is a parcel of
improved real property (the Existing
Facility) located at 385 Market Street in
the Brighton section of Boston,
Massachusetts.
7. Until February 2010 when
construction on the Condo was
completed, the Fund provided all of its
classes and training in the Existing
Facility. Purchased in 1975, from an
unrelated third party, the Fund owns
the Existing Facility free and clear of
any mortgages. In February of 2010, the
Fund entered into a purchase and sale
agreement for the Existing Facility with
Eli Jammal of Brookline Development,
an unrelated party, for $1.5 million. It
is represented that the sales price of the
Existing Facility is $210,000 more than
the net book value of the Existing
Facility carried on the 2008 audited
financial statement of the Fund.
8. On February 1, 2008, the Union
purchased for cash in the amount of
$5.8 million, a parcel of improved real
property (the Original Property) from an
unrelated third party. The Original
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
33352
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
Property is described as a 48,000 square
foot two-story building on a 64,000
square foot lot located at 750 Dorchester
Avenue, in Boston, Massachusetts.
When purchased, the Union planned to
renovate and expand the Original
Property.
9. The Union established the Building
Corporation as a limited liability
company for the purpose of developing
the Original Property. In this regard, the
Union contributed the Original Property
to the Building Corporation in exchange
for sole interest in the Building
Corporation. The Building Corporation
is a party in interest with respect to the
Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(G) of
the Act, as 50 percent (50%) or more of
the interests in the Building Corporation
are owned by the Union.
10. Construction on the renovation
and expansion of the Original Property
began in January 2009. As of February
2010, the Union had completed the
renovation and expansion of the
Original Property and had separated the
Building into two (2) condominium
units. The Union owns one of the
condominium units through its
ownership of the Building Corporation,
and the Building Corporation intends to
sell the other condominium unit to the
Fund.
On February 24, 2009, the Fund filed
an application (L–11558) with the
Department seeking an administrative
exemption to permit the Fund to
purchase the Condo. The Department
published a Notice of Proposed
Exemption (the Notice) in the Federal
Register on December 22, 2009.12 In this
regard, appearing elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, the
Department is publishing a final
exemption for the purchase of the
Condo by the Fund.
11. In order that the Fund could hold
its spring 2010 classes in the Condo and
in order to establish a closing date with
the prospective purchaser of the
Existing Facility, the Board decided to
pursue the option of renting the Condo
to the Fund for a short term until the
Fund could obtain financing to close on
the purchase of the Condo and could
obtain a final exemption from the
Department to permit the Fund to
purchase the Condo from the Building
Corporation.
12. It is represented that the Board
retained its management co-counsel, Mr.
Grosso of O’Reilly, Grosso & Gross, PC
to represent the Fund in the leasing
transaction. It is represented that Mr.
Grosso is independent in that he has
never represented the Building
Corporation and does not provide legal
1274
FR 68120.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
services to the Union. Mr. Grosso is
qualified in that he is an attorney
representing employers and
management in labor relations matters,
primarily in the construction industry.
It is represented that the
responsibilities of Mr. Grosso, acting as
attorney on behalf of the Fund, included
obtaining an appraisal of the fair market
rental value of the Condo.
13. On January 15, 2010, Mr. Grosso
obtained an appraisal of the fair market
rental value of the Condo from CBRE/CB
Richard Ellis (CBRE). James T. Moore
(Mr. Moore), Senior Vice President/
Partner of CBRE and Harris E. Collins
(Mr. Collins), Senior Vice President/
Partner of CBRE prepared an appraisal
of the fair market rental value of the
Condo.
Mr. Moore is qualified in that he is an
Associate Member of the Appraisal
Institute, a member of the Real Estate
Finance Association, Greater Boston
Real Estate Board, and is a
Massachusetts Certified General
Appraiser. Mr. Collins is qualified in
that, among other qualifications, he is a
member of the Appraisal Institute
(MAI), a member of the Counselors of
Real Estate (CRE), a member of the Real
Estate Finance Association-Greater
Boston Real Estate Board, and is a
Massachusetts Certified General
Appraiser.
Both Mr. Moore and Mr. Collins are
independent in that neither has a
present or prospective interest in or bias
with respect to the property that is the
subject of the appraisal and neither have
a business or personal interest in or bias
with respect to the parties involved. It
is further represented that the
engagement of Mr. Moore and Mr.
Collins and the compensation for
completing the appraisal assignment
was not contingent upon the
development or reporting of
predetermined results.
With regard to the Fund’s proposed
leasing, CBRE established the fair
market rental value of 35,112 square feet
of space in the Building at $30 per
square foot, triple net, as of January 15,
2010, based on market rent comparables
and on the return of cost approach.
14. On January 22, 2010, the Board
appointed a subcommittee to act on
behalf of the Fund for the purpose of
negotiating the terms of the Lease. The
Fund subcommittee consisted of two (2)
members: (a) Mr. Pedi, a labor
representative on the Board, an
employee of the Union, and a member
of Local 218; and (b) Mr. Allen, a
management representative on the
Board, and a principal of Archer
Corporation, a contributing employer to
the Fund and a subcontractor of a
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subcontractor on the renovation and
expansion of the Building. It is
represented that the Fund subcommittee
did not have authority to enter into the
Lease but only to negotiate terms which
were to be brought back to the full
Board for approval.
The Union also appointed a
subcommittee to negotiate the terms of
the Lease. The Union subcommittee
consisted of four (4) members: (a) Jack
Donahue, a member of the Union
Executive Board in central
Massachusetts; (b) Dave Palmisciano, a
member of the Union Executive Board
from Rhode Island; (c) Beth Conway, the
Union’s comptroller; and (d) Mark
Erlich (Mr. Erlich), the Executive
Secretary/Treasurer and chief executive
officer of the Union.
15. It is represented that the
responsibilities of Mr. Grosso, acting as
attorney on behalf of the Fund, also
included assisting in the negotiations of
the Lease in order to ensure that the
terms of the Lease were at least as
favorable to the Fund as terms
negotiated at arm’s length. Accordingly,
on January 29, 2010, the Union
subcommittee, the Fund subcommittee,
and Mr. Grosso met to negotiate the
terms of the Lease.
16. The terms of the Lease negotiated
by the Union subcommittee, the Fund
subcommittee, and Mr. Grosso provide
for a month-to-month leasing by the
Fund from the Building Corporation of
35,112 rentable square feet of space in
the Building at a monthly rental rate of
$73,150 (based on an annual rental of
$25 per rentable square foot) for total
rent of $877,800 per annum. Under the
terms of the Lease, the Fund is
responsible for a pro rata share of taxes,
insurance, and operating expenses
(including repairs) incurred by the
Building Corporation with respect to the
Building. The Lease can be terminated
by either party giving not less than
thirty (30) days prior written notice. The
Lease which is the subject of this
exemption and any other leasing
arrangement of the Condo between the
Fund and the Building Corporation and/
or the Union, if not terminated sooner,
shall terminate on the date that the
Fund closes on the purchase of the
Condo from the Building Corporation;
and the Fund shall have no obligation
to pay rent to the Union or to the
Building Corporation after the date of
such termination. Under the terms of
the Lease, in the event that the Fund
purchases the Condo, the lesser of (a)
$52,668 or (b) the product of (ii) 12
percent (12%), times (ii) the aggregate
rental payments paid by the Fund
though the purchase date will be
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
credited to the Fund toward the
purchase price of the Condo.
17. The Building Corporation and the
Fund entered into the Lease dated
January 29, 2010. The Lease was signed
by Mr. Erlich, on behalf of the Union,
and Mr. MacKinnon on behalf of the
Fund.
18. It is represented that on February
26, 2010, the terms of the Lease were
presented to the full Board, including
Mr. Pedi and Mr. Allen, who were also
members of the Fund subcommittee that
negotiated the terms of the Lease. With
two (2) abstentions, the Board voted
unanimously to accept the terms of the
Lease. The two (2) abstaining members
of the Board were Mr. Power, a labor
representative on the Board who is also
a member of the Union Executive Board,
and Mr. DeNapoli, a management
representative on the Board who is also
the Executive Vice President and
General Manager of Suffolk
Construction, the construction manager
responsible for the renovation and
expansion of the Building, that was
retained by the Union. It is represented
that Mr. Power and Mr. DeNapoli
recused themselves from all votes and
matters before the Board relating to the
Lease by the Fund of the Condo from
the Building Corporation.
19. As Mr. Grosso’s responsibilities,
on behalf of the Fund, also included
reviewing and approving any written
agreement that the Fund would sign
with respect to the leasing arrangement,
it is represented that the Fund not
deliver the February 2010 rent until
March 1, 2010, after Mr. Grosso had
reviewed and approved the terms of the
Lease.
20. Mr. Grosso is also responsible
throughout the duration of the Lease for:
(a) Monitoring the rent payments made
by the Fund to ensure that such
payments are consistent with the
amount of rental specified under the
terms of such Lease, (b) monitoring the
payments of the Fund’s share of the
expenses for taxes, insurance, and
operating expenses (including repairs)
to ensure that such payments represent
a fair apportionment of such expenses;
and (c) determining that the Fund has
sufficient assets to pay the rental
amount and its portion of taxes,
insurance, and operating expenses
(including repairs). In this regard, it is
represented that Mr. Grosso reviewed
the rent invoices, check register, and
balance sheet of the Fund. Mr. Grosso
also reviewed the preparation of the
invoices and the allocation of expenses
at the Building Corporation office. Mr.
Grosso states that the monthly rent
invoiced by the Building Corporation
and paid by the Fund for each month—
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
February through May 2010—was
$73,150, the same amount as set forth in
the Lease. The expenses allocated and
billed to the Fund for February, March,
and April 2010, pursuant to the triple
net provision of the Lease were figured
each month based on the fact that the
Condo represents a 58 percent (58%)
interest in the Building. Mr. Grosso
states that this percentage interest is the
same as described in the Condominium
Deed. In the opinion of Mr. Grosso, this
percentage is fair and reasonable. It is
represented that the balance sheet of the
Fund shows cash in the amount of
$4,245,412.39 which to Mr. Grosso
appears more than adequate for the
Fund to be able to afford the rent, taking
into consideration the training expenses
of the Fund. It is represented that Mr.
Grosso will continue to review the rent
payments made by the Fund until the
Lease is terminated.
21. The applicant represents that in
entering into the Lease with the
Building Corporation, the Fund relied
on the relief from the prohibitions of
section 406(a) of the Act which is
provided by PTE 78–6.13 It is further
represented that at the time the Building
Corporation and the Fund entered into
the Lease of the Condo, all of the
conditions specified in PTCE 78–6 were
satisfied.14
In this regard, Mr. Krakow, acting as
legal counsel for the Board, advised the
Board that it was permissible for the
Fund to enter into a short term lease
with the Union for the Condo; provided
that: (a) The transaction was on terms at
least as favorable to the fund as an arm’s
length transaction with an unrelated
party would be; (b) the transaction was
appropriate and helpful in carrying out
13 PTE 78–6 provides relief from section 406(a) of
the Act for the leasing of real property (other than
office space within the contemplation of section
408(b)(2) of the Act) by an apprenticeship plan from
an employee organization any of whose members’
work results in contributions being made to such
apprenticeship plan. The Department is offering no
view, herein, as to whether the Lease between the
Fund and the Building Corporation and/or the
Union was exempt from section 406(a) of the Act
under the provisions of the class exemption PTE
78–6. Further, the Department, herein, is not
providing relief for any leasing between the Fund
and the Building Corporation or the Union beyond
that which is proposed herein.
14 The conditions of PTE 78–6 require that the
terms of a leasing arrangement by an apprenticeship
plan from an employee organization any of whose
members’ work results in contributions being made
to such apprenticeship plan must be arm’s length,
the transaction must be appropriate and helpful in
carrying out the purposes of such apprenticeship
plan, and certain records must be maintained for a
period of six years from the termination of such
leasing arrangement. The Department is not offering
any opinion, herein, as to whether the applicant has
satisfied the conditions of PTE 78–6 with regard to
the Lease between the Fund and the Building
Corporation and/or the Union.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33353
the purposes for which the Fund was
established and maintained; and (c) the
Fund maintained records of the
transaction for six (6) years from the
termination of the transaction. Mr.
Krakow further represents that in
entering into the Lease, the Board,
acting in good faith, relied on Mr.
Krakow’s advice.
Although PTE 78–6 provides relief
from section 406(a) of the Act for the
leasing of real property (other than
office space within the contemplation of
section 408(b)(2) of the Act), it is the
view of the Department that PTE 78–6
does not provide relief for the leasing of
office space by an apprenticeship plan
from a contributing employer, a wholly
owned subsidiary of such employer, or
from an employee organization any of
whose members’ work results in
contributions being made to such
apprenticeship plan.
The statutory exemption, pursuant to
section 408(b)(2) of the Act, does
provide relief from section 406(a) of the
Act for contracting or making reasonable
arrangements with a party in interest for
office space, or legal, accounting, or
other services necessary for the
establishment or operation of the plan,
if no more than reasonable
compensation is paid therefore. The
Department is offering no view, herein,
as to whether the leasing of office space
between the Fund and the Building
Corporation and/or the Union would be
exempt from section 406(a) of the Act,
pursuant to the statutory exemption.
Neither the class exemption, PTE 78–
6, nor the statutory exemption, as set
forth in section 408(b)(2) of the Act,
provide relief from the prohibitions of
section 406(b) of the Act. Accordingly,
the applicant has requested an
administrative exemption from section
406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act. In
addition, as a result of the Fund’s
occupancy of the Condo for the period
starting on January 29, 2010, and ending
on June 30, 2010, the applicant has
requested retroactive relief to
encompass that period.
22. It is represented that the
transaction which is the subject of this
proposed exemption is feasible in that
the Fund will maintain records for
review by the Department and others to
insure that the conditions of the
exemption are satisfied. Further, it is
represented that all the terms of the
proposed transaction are known and
have been disclosed in the Lease.
23. The proposed exemption contains
conditions which are designed to ensure
the presence of adequate safeguards to
protect the interests of the Fund
regarding the subject transaction. In this
regard, the fair market rental value of
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
33354
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
the Condo was determined by an
independent, qualified appraiser.
Further, Mr. Grosso, acting as attorney,
for the Fund, assisted in the negotiation
of the terms of the Lease, reviewed and
approved the terms of such Lease to
ensure that such terms are at least as
favorable to the Fund as an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated party, and
determined that such terms are fair and
reasonable. In addition, Mr. Grosso has
determined that the rent paid by the
Fund for the period between February
and May 2010 was the amount specified
under the Lease, that the expenses for
taxes, insurance, and operating expense
(including repairs) have been fairly
apportioned to the Fund, and that the
Fund has sufficient assets to pay such
rent and expenses. It is represented that
Mr. Grosso will continue to review the
payments made by the Fund in
connection with the Lease which is the
subject of this proposed exemption,
until such Lease is terminated.
24. The applicant maintains that the
proposed transaction is in the interest of
the participants and beneficiaries of the
Fund, because the rent under the terms
of the Lease is below the fair market
rental value, as determined by CBRE.
Further, it is represented that the month
to month term of the Lease is favorable
to the Fund, and that such month to
month term is not commonly found in
commercial leases. The applicant also
maintains that by leasing and moving
into the Condo prior to purchasing the
Condo, the Fund was able to market the
existing training facility for sale.
25. With respect to the June 30, 2010,
ending date for the Lease, it is
represented that the Fund will send the
Building Corporation a notice of
termination of the Lease, effective June
30, 2010. In addition, the Fund will
request that the Building Corporation
renegotiate the terms and enter into a
new leasing arrangement of the Condo,
starting on July 1, 2010, and continuing,
until the Fund closes on the purchase of
the Condo from the Building
Corporation. In entering into the new
leasing arrangement, the Fund will rely
on the relief provided by the class
exemption, PTE 78–6, for the leasing of
training space by a plan from a party in
interest and will rely on the relief
provided by the statutory exemption,
pursuant to 408(b)(2) of the Act, for the
leasing of office space by a plan from a
party in interest.15 It is represented that
15 The Department is offering no view, herein, as
to whether PTE 78–6 covers the new leasing
agreement between the Building Corporation and
the Fund for training space. Further, the
Department is not opining as to whether the
conditions of PTE 78–6 in connection with such
leasing of training space to the Fund by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
all of the labor representatives on the
Board will recuse themselves from the
discussions, negotiations, and approval
of the new leasing arrangement. Further,
Mr. DeNapoli and Mr. Allen, both of
whom are management representatives
on the Board, because of their
involvement in the renovation and
expansion of the Building, will recuse
themselves from the discussions,
negotiations and approval of the new
leasing arrangement.
25. In summary, the applicant
represents that the proposed transaction
meets the statutory criteria for an
exemption under section 408(a) of the
Act because:
(a) Prior to entering into the Lease, the
Fund sought legal advice from Mr.
Krakow, acting as legal counsel on
behalf of the Fund, who advised the
Fund that it was permissible for the
Fund to enter into a short term lease
with the Building Corporation, and the
Board relied on Mr. Krakow’s advice;
(b) The Lease which is the subject of
this exemption and any other leasing
arrangement of the Condo between the
Fund and the Building Corporation, if
not terminated sooner, shall terminate
on the date that the Fund closes on the
purchase of the Condo from the
Building Corporation; and the Fund
shall have no obligation to pay rent to
the Union or to the Building
Corporation after the date of such
termination;
(c) before the Fund entered into the
Lease of the Condo, Mr. Grosso, acting
as attorney for the Fund, assisted in the
negotiation of the terms of the Lease,
reviewed and approved the terms of
such Lease to ensure that such terms are
at least as favorable to the Fund as an
arm’s length transaction with an
unrelated party, determined that such
terms are fair and reasonable, and
selected an independent, qualified
appraiser to determine the fair market
rental value of the Condo;
(d) Mr. Grosso is also responsible
throughout the duration of the Lease for:
(1) Monitoring the rent payments made
by the Fund to ensure that such
payments are consistent with the
amount of rental specified under the
terms of such Lease, (2) monitoring the
Building Corporation have been and will be
satisfied.
In addition, the Department is offering no view,
herein, as to whether the leasing agreement between
the Building Corporation and the Fund for office
space is covered by the statutory exemption
provided in section 408(b)(2) of the Act and the
Department’s regulations, pursuant to 29 CFR
2550.408b–2. Further, the Department is not
opining as to whether the conditions of 408(b)(2) in
connection with such leasing of office space to the
Fund by the Building Corporation have been and
will be satisfied.
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
payments of the Fund’s share of the
expenses for taxes, insurance, and
operating expenses (including repairs)
to ensure that such payments represent
a fair apportionment of such expenses;
(3) determining that the Fund has
sufficient assets to pay the rental
amount and its portion of taxes,
insurance, and operating expenses
(including repairs); and (4) monitoring,
throughout the duration of the Lease,
the terms of the Lease of the Condo
between the Fund and the Building
Corporation to ensure that the terms of
the Lease are at all times satisfied;
(e) the rent paid by the Fund for the
Condo under the terms of the Lease is
at no time greater than the fair market
rental value of the Condo, as determined
by an independent, qualified appraiser
selected by Mr. Grosso;
(f) under the provisions of the Lease,
the subject transaction is on terms and
at all times remains on terms that are at
least as favorable to the Fund as those
that would have been negotiated under
similar circumstances at arm’s length
with an unrelated third party;
(g) the transaction is appropriate and
helpful in carrying out the purposes for
which the Fund is established or
maintained; and
(h) the Board maintains, or causes to
be maintained within the United States
for a period of six (6) years in a manner
that is convenient and accessible for
audit and examination, such records as
are necessary to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been
met.
Notice to Interested Persons
Those persons who may be interested
in the publication in the Federal
Register of the Notice include all
members of the Locals in the Boston
area and all of the Employer
Associations.
It is represented that notification will
be provided to all such interested
persons by first class mail within fifteen
(15) calendar days of the date of
publication of the Notice in the Federal
Register. Such mailing will contain a
copy of the Notice, as it appears in the
Federal Register on the date of
publication, plus a copy of the
supplemental statement, as required,
pursuant to 29 CFR 2570.43(b)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, which will
advise all interested persons of the right
to comment and to request a hearing.
The Department must receive all
written comments and requests for a
hearing no later than forty-five (45) days
from the date of the publication of the
Notice in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angelena C. Le Blanc of the Department,
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
telephone (202) 693–8551. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Sunshine Act Meeting
General Information
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(4) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
June, 2010.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
The Board of Directors
of the Legal Services Corporation will
meet by telephone on June 15, 2010.
The meeting will begin at 12 p.m., e.s.t.,
and continue until conclusion of the
Board’s agenda.
TIME AND DATE:
LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K Street, NW., 3rd Floor
Conference Center, Washington, DC,
20007.
PUBLIC OBSERVATION: For all meetings
and portions thereof open to public
observation, members of the public that
wish to listen to the proceedings may do
so by following the telephone call-in
directions given below. You are asked to
keep your telephone muted to eliminate
background noises. From time to time
the Chairman may solicit comments
from the public.
CALL-IN DIRECTIONS FOR OPEN SESSION(S):
• Call toll-free number: 1- (866) 451–
4981;
• When prompted, enter the
following numeric pass code:
5907707348;
• When connected to the call, please
‘‘Mute’’ your telephone immediately.
STATUS OF MEETING:
Open.
Matters To Be Considered
Open Session
1. Approval of agenda.
2. Consider and act on revisions to the
LSC Accounting Guide for LSC
Recipients.
3. Public comment.
4. Consider and act on other business.
5. Consider and act on adjournment of
meeting.
CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:
Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to
the Vice President for Legal Affairs, at
(202) 295–1500. Questions may be sent
by electronic mail to
FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.
SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting
notices will be made available in
alternate formats to accommodate visual
and hearing impairments. Individuals
who have a disability and need an
accommodation to attend the meeting
may notify Katherine Ward at (202)
295–1500 or
FR_NOTICE_QUESTIONS@lsc.gov.
Dated: June 8, 2010.
Patricia D. Batie,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–14023 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2010–14171 Filed 6–9–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33355
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Records Schedules; Availability and
Request for Comments
AGENCY: National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed records schedules; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA)
publishes notice at least once monthly
of certain Federal agency requests for
records disposition authority (records
schedules). Once approved by NARA,
records schedules provide mandatory
instructions on what happens to records
when no longer needed for current
Government business. They authorize
the preservation of records of
continuing value in the National
Archives of the United States and the
destruction, after a specified period, of
records lacking administrative, legal,
research, or other value. Notice is
published for records schedules in
which agencies propose to destroy
records not previously authorized for
disposal or reduce the retention period
of records already authorized for
disposal. NARA invites public
comments on such records schedules, as
required by 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a).
DATES: Requests for copies must be
received in writing on or before July 12,
2010. Once the appraisal of the records
is completed, NARA will send a copy of
the schedule. NARA staff usually
prepare appraisal memorandums that
contain additional information
concerning the records covered by a
proposed schedule. These, too, may be
requested and will be provided once the
appraisal is completed. Requesters will
be given 30 days to submit comments.
ADDRESSES: You may request a copy of
any records schedule identified in this
notice by contacting the Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML) using
one of the following means:
Mail: NARA (NWML), 8601 Adelphi
Road, College Park, MD 20740–6001.
E-mail: request.schedule@nara.gov.
FAX: 301–837–3698.
Requesters must cite the control
number, which appears in parentheses
after the name of the agency which
submitted the schedule, and must
provide a mailing address. Those who
desire appraisal reports should so
indicate in their request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurence Brewer, Director, Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML),
National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road,
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 112 (Friday, June 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33343-33355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14023]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Application Nos. and Proposed Exemptions; D-11573, Citigroup
Global Markets, Inc. and Its Affiliates (Together, CGMI or the
Applicant); and L-11624, Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and Training
Fund (the Fund), et al.
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 33344]]
SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
Written Comments and Hearing Requests
All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
requests for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice. Comments and
requests for a hearing should state: (1) The name, address, and
telephone number of the person making the comment or request, and (2)
the nature of the person's interest in the exemption and the manner in
which the person would be adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the issues to be addressed and
include a general description of the evidence to be presented at the
hearing.
ADDRESSES: All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least
three copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5700,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20210. Attention: Application No. ----, stated in each Notice of
Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via e-mail or FAX. Any such
comments or requests should be sent either by e-mail to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: If you submit written comments or hearing requests, do not
include any personally-identifiable or confidential business
information that you do not want to be publicly-disclosed. All comments
and hearing requests are posted on the Internet exactly as they are
received, and they can be retrieved by most Internet search engines.
The Department will make no deletions, modifications or redactions to
the comments or hearing requests received, as they are public records.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all
interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the
Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal
Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed
exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed exemptions were requested in
applications filed pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).
Effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4
of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to
the Secretary of Labor. Therefore, these notices of proposed exemption
are issued solely by the Department.
The applications contain representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Its Affiliates (Together, CGMI or
the Applicant) Located in New York, New York
[Application No. D-11573]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act (or ERISA) and section
4975(c)(2) of the Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth
in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, August 10, 1990).
Section I. Covered Transactions
A. If the exemption is granted, the restrictions of section 406(a)
of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the
Code, shall not apply, effective May 31, 2009, to the purchase or
redemption of shares by an employee benefit plan, an individual
retirement account (an IRA), a retirement plan for self-employed
individuals (a Keogh Plan), or an individual account pension plan that
is subject to the provisions of Title I of the Act and established
under section 403(b) of the Code (the Section 403(b) Plan)
(collectively, the Plans) in the Trust for Consulting Group Capital
Markets Funds (the Trust), sponsored by MSSB in connection with such
Plans' participation in the TRAK Personalized Investment Advisory
Service (the TRAK Program).
B. If the exemption is granted, the restrictions of section 406(b)
of the Act and the sanctions resulting from the application of section
4975 of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(E) and (F) of the
Code, shall not apply, effective May 31, 2009, with respect to the
provision of (i) investment advisory services by the Adviser or (ii) an
automatic reallocation option as described below (the Automatic
Reallocation Option) to an independent fiduciary of a participating
Plan (the Independent Plan Fiduciary), which may result in such
fiduciary's selection of a portfolio (the Portfolio) \1\ in the TRAK
Program for the investment of Plan assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For the avoidance of doubt, unless the context suggests
otherwise, the term ``Portfolio'' includes the Stable Value
Investments Fund, a collective trust fund established and maintained
by First State Trust Company, formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Citigroup.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This exemption is subject to the following conditions set forth
below in Section II.
Section II. General Conditions
(a) The participation of Plans in the TRAK Program is
(b) approved by an Independent Plan Fiduciary. For purposes of this
requirement, an employee, officer or director of the Adviser and/or its
affiliates covered by an IRA not subject to Title I of the Act will be
considered an Independent Plan Fiduciary with respect to such IRA.
(c) The total fees paid to the Adviser and its affiliates will
constitute no more than reasonable compensation.
(d) No Plan pays a fee or commission by reason of the acquisition
or redemption of shares in the Trust.
(e) The terms of each purchase or redemption of Trust shares remain
at least as favorable to an investing Plan as those obtainable in an
arm's length transaction with an unrelated party.
(f) The Adviser provides written documentation to an Independent
Plan Fiduciary of its recommendations or evaluations based upon
objective criteria.
(g) Any recommendation or evaluation made by the Adviser to an
[[Page 33345]]
Independent Plan Fiduciary is implemented only at the express direction
of such Independent Plan Fiduciary, provided, however, that--
(1) If such Independent Plan Fiduciary elects in writing (the
Election), on a form designated by the Adviser from time to time for
such purpose, to participate in the Automatic Reallocation Option under
the TRAK Program, the affected Plan or participant account is
automatically reallocated whenever the Adviser modifies the particular
asset allocation recommendation which the Independent Plan Fiduciary
has chosen. Such Election continues in effect until revoked or
terminated by the Independent Plan Fiduciary in writing.
(2) Except as set forth below in paragraph II(f)(3), at the time of
a change in the Adviser's asset allocation recommendation, each account
based upon the asset allocation model (the Allocation Model) affected
by such change is adjusted on the business day of the release of the
new Allocation Model by the Adviser, except to the extent that market
conditions, and order purchase and redemption procedures, may delay
such processing through a series of purchase and redemption
transactions to shift assets among the affected Portfolios.
(3) If the change in the Adviser's asset allocation recommendation
exceeds an increase or decrease of more than 10 percent in the absolute
percentage allocated to any one investment medium (e.g., a suggested
increase in a 15 percent allocation to greater than 25 percent, or a
decrease of such 15 percent allocation to less than 5 percent), the
Adviser sends out a written notice (the Notice) to all Independent Plan
Fiduciaries whose current investment allocation may be affected,
describing the proposed reallocation and the date on which such
allocation is to be instituted (the Effective Date). If the Independent
Plan Fiduciary notifies the Adviser, in writing, at any time within the
period of 30 calendar days prior to the proposed Effective Date that
such fiduciary does not wish to follow such revised asset allocation
recommendation, the Allocation Model remains at the current level, or
at such other level as the Independent Plan Fiduciary then expressly
designated, in writing. If the Independent Plan Fiduciary does not
affirmatively `opt out' of the new Adviser recommendation, in writing,
prior to the proposed Effective Date, such new recommendation is
automatically effected by a dollar-for-dollar liquidation and purchase
of the required amounts in the respective account.
(4) An Independent Plan Fiduciary will receive a trade confirmation
of each reallocation transaction. In this regard, for all Plan
investors other than Section 404(c) Plan accounts (i.e., 401(k) Plan
accounts), CGMI or MSSB, as applicable, mails trade confirmations on
the next business day after the reallocation trades are executed. In
the case of Section 404(c) Plan participants, notification depends upon
the notification provisions agreed to by the Plan recordkeeper.
(h) The Adviser generally gives investment advice in writing to an
Independent Plan Fiduciary with respect to all available Portfolios.
However, in the case of a Plan providing for participant-directed
investments (the Section 404(c) Plan), the Adviser provides investment
advice that is limited to the Portfolios made available under the Plan.
(i) Any sub-adviser (the Sub-Adviser) that acts for the Trust to
exercise investment discretion over a Portfolio is independent of
Morgan Stanley, Inc. (Morgan Stanley), CGMI, MSSB and their respective
affiliates (collectively, the Affiliated Entities).
(j) Immediately following the acquisition by a Portfolio of any
securities that are issued by any Affiliated Entity, such as Citigroup
or Morgan Stanley common stock (the Adviser Common Stock), the
percentage of that Portfolio's net assets invested in such securities
will not exceed one percent. However, this percentage limitation may be
exceeded if--
(1) The amount held by a Sub-Adviser in managing a Portfolio is
held in order to replicate an established third-party index (the
Index).
(2) The Index represents the investment performance of a specific
segment of the public market for equity securities in the United States
and/or foreign countries. The organization creating the Index is:
(i) Engaged in the business of providing financial information;
(ii) A publisher of financial news information; or
(iii) A public stock exchange or association of securities dealers.
The Index is created and maintained by an organization independent
of the Affiliated Entities and is a generally-accepted standardized
Index of securities which is not specifically tailored for use by the
Affiliated Entities.
(3) The acquisition or disposition of Adviser Common Stock does not
include any agreement, arrangement or understanding regarding the
design or operation of the Portfolio acquiring such Adviser Common
Stock, which is intended to benefit the Affiliated Entities or any
party in which any of the Affiliated Entities may have an interest.
(4) The Independent Plan Fiduciary authorizes the investment of a
Plan's assets in an Index Fund which purchases and/or holds the Adviser
Common Stock and the Sub-Adviser is responsible for voting any shares
of Adviser Common Stock that are held by an Index Fund on any matter in
which shareholders of Adviser Common Stock are required or permitted to
vote.
(k) The quarterly investment advisory fee that is paid by a Plan to
the Adviser for investment advisory services rendered to such Plan is
offset by any amount in excess of 20 basis points that MSSB retains
from any Portfolio (with the exception of the Money Market Investments
Portfolio and the Stable Value Investments Portfolio for which neither
MSSB nor the Trust will retain any investment management fee) which
contains investments attributable to the Plan investor.
(l) With respect to its participation in the TRAK Program prior to
purchasing Trust shares,
(1) Each Plan receives the following written or oral disclosures
from the Adviser:
(A) A copy of the Prospectus for the Trust discussing the
investment objectives of the Portfolios comprising the Trust, the
policies employed to achieve these objectives, the corporate
affiliation existing among the Adviser and its affiliates, and the
compensation paid to such entities.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The fact that certain transactions and fee arrangements are
the subject of an administrative exemption does not relieve the
Independent Plan Fiduciary from the general fiduciary responsibility
provisions of section 404 of the Act. In this regard, the Department
expects the Independent Plan Fiduciary to consider carefully the
totality of the fees and expenses to be paid by the Plan, including
any fees paid directly to MSSB, CGMI or to other third parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Upon written or oral request to the Adviser, a Statement of
Additional Information supplementing the Prospectus which describes the
types of securities and other instruments in which the Portfolios may
invest, the investment policies and strategies that the Portfolios may
utilize and certain risks attendant to those investments, policies and
strategies.
(C) A copy of the investment advisory agreement between the Adviser
and such Plan which relates to participation in the TRAK Program and
describes the Automatic Reallocation Option.
(D) Upon written request of the Adviser, a copy of the respective
investment advisory agreement between MSSB and the Sub-Advisers.
[[Page 33346]]
(E) In the case of a Section 404(c) Plan, if required by the
arrangement negotiated between the Adviser and the Plan, an explanation
by an Adviser representative (the Financial Advisor) to eligible
participants in such Plan, of the services offered under the TRAK
Program and the operation and objectives of the Portfolios.
(F) A copy of the proposed exemption and the final exemption
pertaining to the exemptive relief described herein.
(2) If accepted as an investor in the TRAK Program, an Independent
Plan Fiduciary of an IRA or Keogh Plan is required to acknowledge, in
writing, prior to purchasing Trust shares that such fiduciary has
received copies of the documents described above in subparagraph (k)(1)
of this section.
(3) With respect to a Section 404(c) Plan, written acknowledgement
of the receipt of such documents is provided by the Independent Plan
Fiduciary (i.e., the Plan administrator, trustee or named fiduciary, as
the recordholder of Trust shares). Such Independent Plan Fiduciary is
required to represent in writing to the Adviser that such fiduciary is
(a) independent of the Affiliated Entities and (b) knowledgeable with
respect to the Plan in administrative matters and funding matters
related thereto, and able to make an informed decision concerning
participation in the TRAK Program.
(4) With respect to a Plan that is covered under Title I of the
Act, where investment decisions are made by a trustee, investment
manager or a named fiduciary, such Independent Plan Fiduciary is
required to acknowledge, in writing, receipt of such documents and
represent to the Adviser that such fiduciary is (a) independent of the
Affiliated Entities, (b) capable of making an independent decision
regarding the investment of Plan assets and (c) knowledgeable with
respect to the Plan in administrative matters and funding matters
related thereto, and able to make an informed decision concerning
participation in the TRAK Program.
(m) Subsequent to its participation in the TRAK Program, each Plan
receives the following written or oral disclosures with respect to its
ongoing participation in the TRAK Program:
(1) The Trust's semi-annual and annual report including a financial
statement for the Trust and investment management fees paid by each
Portfolio.
(2) A written quarterly monitoring statement containing an analysis
and an evaluation of a Plan investor's account to ascertain whether the
Plan's investment objectives have been met and recommending, if
required, changes in Portfolio allocations.
(3) If required by the arrangement negotiated between the Adviser
and a Section 404(c) Plan, a quarterly, detailed investment performance
monitoring report, in writing, provided to an Independent Plan
Fiduciary of such Plan showing Plan level asset allocations, Plan cash
flow analysis and annualized risk adjusted rates of return for Plan
investments. In addition, if required by such arrangement, Financial
Advisors meet periodically with Independent Plan Fiduciaries of Section
404(c) Plans to discuss the report as well as with eligible
participants to review their accounts' performance.
(4) If required by the arrangement negotiated between the Adviser
and a Section 404(c) Plan, a quarterly participant performance
monitoring report provided to a Plan participant which accompanies the
participant's benefit statement and describes the investment
performance of the Portfolios, the investment performance of the
participant's individual investment in the TRAK Program, and gives
market commentary and toll-free numbers that enable the participant to
obtain more information about the TRAK Program or to amend his or her
investment allocations.
(5) On a quarterly and annual basis, written disclosures to all
Plans of (a) the percentage of each Portfolio's brokerage commissions
that are paid to the Affiliated Entities and (b) the average brokerage
commission per share paid by each Portfolio to the Affiliated Entities,
as compared to the average brokerage commission per share paid by the
Trust to brokers other than the Affiliated Entities, both expressed as
cents per share.
(n) The Adviser maintains or causes to be maintained, for a period
of (6) six years, the records necessary to enable the persons described
in paragraph (m)(1) of this section to determine whether the applicable
conditions of this exemption have been met. Such records are readily
available to assure accessibility by the persons identified in
paragraph (1) of this section.
(1) Notwithstanding any provisions of section 504(a)(2) and (b) of
the Act, the records referred to in the first paragraph of this section
are unconditionally available at their customary location for
examination during normal business hours by--
(i) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department or the Internal Revenue Service;
(ii) Any fiduciary of a participating Plan or any duly authorized
representative of such fiduciary;
(iii) Any contributing employer to any participating Plan or any
duly authorized employee representative of such employer; and
(iv) Any participant or beneficiary of any participating Plan, or
any duly authorized representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) A prohibited transaction is not deemed to have occurred if, due
to circumstances beyond the control of the Adviser, the records are
lost or destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period, and no party
in interest other than the Adviser is subject to the civil penalty that
may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act or to the taxes imposed
by sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Code if the records are not
maintained or are not available for examination as required by
paragraph (1) of this section.
(3) None of the persons described in subparagraphs (ii)-(iv) of
this section (m)(1) is authorized to examine the trade secrets of the
Adviser or commercial or financial information which is privileged or
confidential.
(4) Should the Adviser refuse to disclose information on the basis
that such information is exempt from disclosure, the Adviser shall, by
the close of the thirtieth (30th) day following the request, provide
written notice advising that person of the reason for the refusal and
that the Department may request such information.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this proposed exemption:
(a) The term ``Adviser'' means CGMI or MSSB as investment adviser
to Plans.
(b) The term ``Affiliated Entities'' means Morgan Stanley, CGMI,
MSSB and their respective affiliates.
(c) The term ``CGMI'' means Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and any
affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
(d) An ``affiliate'' of any of the Affiliated Entities includes:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with the Affiliated Entity. (For purposes of this subparagraph, the
term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling influence
over the management or policies of a person other than an individual);
(2) Any individual who is an officer (as defined in Section III(g)
hereof), director or partner in the Affiliated Entity or a person
described in subparagraph (d)(1);
(3) Any corporation or partnership of which the Affiliated Entity,
or an affiliate described in subparagraph (d)(1), is a 10 percent or
more partner or owner; and
[[Page 33347]]
(4) Any corporation or partnership of which any individual which is
an officer or director of the Affiliated Entity is a 10 percent or more
partner or owner.
(e) An ``Independent Plan Fiduciary'' is a Plan fiduciary which is
independent of the Affiliated Entities and is either:
(1) A Plan administrator, sponsor, trustee or named fiduciary, as
the recordholder of Trust shares under a Section 404(c) Plan;
(2) A participant in a Keogh Plan;
(3) An individual covered under (i) a self-directed IRA or (ii) a
Section 403(b) Plan, which invests in Trust shares;
(4) A trustee, investment manager or named fiduciary responsible
for investment decisions in the case of a Title I Plan that does not
permit individual direction as contemplated by Section 404(c) of the
Act; or
(5) A participant in a Plan, such as a Section 404(c) Plan, who is
permitted under the terms of such Plan to direct, and who elects to
direct, the investment of assets of his or her account in such Plan.
(f) The term ``MSSB'' means Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings
LLC, together with its subsidiaries.
(g) The term ``officer'' means a president, any vice president in
charge of a principal business unit, division or function (such as
sales, administration or finance), or any other officer who performs a
policymaking function for the entity.
Section IV. Effective Date
If granted, this proposed exemption will be effective as of May 31,
2009 with respect to the Covered Transactions, the General Conditions
and the Definitions that are described in Sections I, II and III.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. If granted, the proposed individual exemption described herein
would replace Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2009-12 (74 FR
13231, March 26, 2009), an exemption previously granted to CGMI. PTE
2009-12 relates to the operation of the TRAK Personalized Investment
Advisory Service (the TRAK Program) and the Trust for Consulting Group
Capital Markets Funds (the Trust).
PTE 2009-12 provides exemptive relief from section 406(a) of the
Act and section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code, for the purchase
or redemption of shares by various types of Plans, such as ERISA Title
I Plans, IRAs, Keogh Plans, and Section 403(b) Plans, whose assets are
invested in the Trust that was previously established by Citigroup in
connection with such Plans' participation in the TRAK Program.
PTE 2009-12 also provides exemptive relief from section 406(b) of
the Act and section 4975(c)(1)(E) and (F) of the Code, with respect to
the provision, by Citigroup's Consulting Group, of (i) investment
advisory services or (ii) an Automatic Reallocation Option to an
independent fiduciary of a participating Plan (i.e., the Independent
Plan Fiduciary), which may result in such fiduciary's selection of a
Portfolio \3\ in the TRAK Program for the investment of Plan assets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For the avoidance of doubt, unless the context suggests
otherwise, the term ``Portfolio'' includes the Stable Value
Investments Fund, a collective trust fund established and maintained
by First State Trust Company (First State), formerly a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Citigroup.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The Department originally granted to Shearson Lehman Brothers,
Inc. PTE 92-77, which relates to a less evolved form of the TRAK
Program.\4\ PTE 92-77 was superseded by PTE 94-50, which allowed Smith,
Barney Inc. (Smith Barney), the predecessor to Salomon Smith Barney
Inc. (Salomon Smith Barney), to add a daily-traded collective
investment fund (the GIC Fund) to the existing fund Portfolios,
describe the various entities operating the GIC Fund, and replace
references to Shearson Lehman with Smith Barney.\5\ PTE 99-15, which
superseded PTE 94-50, allowed Salomon Smith Barney to create a broader
distribution of TRAK-related products, implement a record-keeping
reimbursement offset procedure under the TRAK Program, adopt the
Automated Reallocation Option under the TRAK Program that would reduce
the asset allocation fee paid to Salomon Smith Barney by a Plan
investor, and expand the scope of the exemption to include Section
403(b) Plans.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 57 FR 45833 (October 5, 1992).
\5\ 59 FR 32024 (June 21, 1994).
\6\ 64 FR 1648 (April 5, 1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Thereafter, PTE 99-15 was replaced by PTE 2000-45, which
primarily modified the definition of an ``affiliate'' of Salomon Smith
Barney so that it only covered persons or entities that had a
significant role in the decisions made by, or which were managed or
influenced by, Salomon Smith Barney, or included any corporation or
partnership of which Salomon Smith Barney or an affiliate was a 10
percent or more partner or owner.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 65 FR 54315 (September 7, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Finally, on March 26, 2009, the Department granted PTE 2009-12.
As the result of a merger transaction (the Merger Transaction) between
Citigroup and Legg Mason, Inc. (Legg Mason), on December 1, 2005, an
affiliate of Citigroup acquired an approximately 14% equity ownership
interest in Legg Mason common and preferred stock. This meant that two
investment adviser subsidiaries of Legg Mason (Brandywine Asset
Management LLC and Western Asset Management Company), which were sub-
advisers (the Sub-Advisers) to three Trust Portfolios under the TRAK
Program, were no longer considered ``independent'' of Citigroup and its
affiliates in violation of Section II(h) of the General Conditions.\8\
Also, the Sub-Advisers were considered ``affiliates'' of Citigroup
under Section III(b)(3) of the General Definitions of PTE 2000-45
inasmuch as Citigroup became a 10% or more indirect owner of each Sub-
Adviser following the Merger Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In PTE 2000-45, Section II(h) of the General Conditions
provided that ``Any sub-adviser (the Sub-Adviser) that acts for the
Trust to exercise investment discretion over a Portfolio will be
independent of Salomon Smith Barney and its affiliates.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Although Citigroup reduced its ownership interest in Legg Mason
to under the 10% ownership threshold on March 10, 2006, the Department
decided that PTE 2000-45 was no longer effective for the transactions
described therein, because Section II(h) of the General Conditions and
Section III(b) of the Definitions were not met. Therefore, the
Department granted PTE 2009-12, a new exemption, which replaced PTE
2000-45. Unless otherwise noted, PTE 2009-12 incorporates by reference
the facts, representations, operative language and definitions of PTE
2000-45. In addition, PTE 2009-12 updates the operative language of PTE
2000-45. Further, PTE 2009-12 provides a temporary and limited
exception to the definition of the term ``affiliate,'' so that during
the three month period of time within which Citigroup held a 10% or
greater economic ownership interest in Legg Mason, the Sub-Advisers
would continue to be considered ``independent'' of CGMI and its
affiliates for purposes of Section II(h) and not ``affiliated'' with
CGMI and its affiliates for purposes of Section III(b) of the
exemption. Finally, PTE 2009-12 provides exemptive relief for a new
method to compute fee offsets that are required under the exemption to
mitigate past anomalies.
PTE 2009-12 is effective from December 1, 2005 until March 10,
2006, with respect to the limited exception. It is also effective as of
December 1, 2005 with respect to the transactions covered by the
exemption, the General Conditions, and the Definitions. Further, PTE
2009-12 is effective as of
[[Page 33348]]
January 1, 2008, with respect to the new fee offset procedure.
Replacement of PTE 2009-12
6. CGMI and its predecessors and current and future affiliates and
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and its current and future affiliates
(collectively, the Applicants) have requested a new exemption that
would replace PTE 2009-12 to reflect the terms of a joint venture
transaction (the Joint Venture Transaction) between Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley, Inc. (Morgan Stanley) that occurred on May 31, 2009. As
a result of the Joint Venture Transaction, which is described in detail
below, the Applicants state that the exemptive relief provided under
PTE 2009-12 is no longer effective due to a change in the parties and
the ownership structure of the TRAK Program. Therefore, the Applicants
request a new exemption that would replace PTE 2009-12. If granted, the
new exemption would be made retroactive to May 31, 2009 and it would
provide the same relief with respect to the transactions covered under
PTE 2009-12. In addition, the General Conditions and Definitions of the
new exemption would be similar to those as set forth in PTE 2009-12.
The Joint Venture Transaction
7. The Applicants represent that on January 13, 2009, Citigroup and
Morgan Stanley entered into a ``Joint Venture Contribution and
Formation Agreement'' (the Joint Venture Agreement), which established
the terms of a new joint venture (the Joint Venture) between Citigroup
and Morgan Stanley. Citigroup and Morgan Stanley are global financial
services providers, each headquartered in New York, New York. As of the
end of 2008, Citigroup reported total client assets under management as
approximately $1.3 trillion. Citigroup's current employee workforce
consists of approximately 300,000 individuals in approximately 16,000
offices in 140 countries around the world. As of the end of 2008,
Morgan Stanley reported total client assets under management as
approximately $546 billion. Its current employee workforce of
approximately 60,000 serves a diversified group of corporations,
governments, financial institutions, and individuals, and operates from
over 1,200 offices in over 36 countries around the world.
8. Under the Joint Venture Agreement, each of Citigroup and Morgan
Stanley (including their respective subsidiaries) agreed to contribute
specified businesses into the Joint Venture, together with all
contracts, employees, property licenses and other assets (as well as
liabilities) used primarily in the contributed businesses. Generally,
in the case of Citigroup, the contributed businesses included
Citigroup's retail brokerage and futures business operated under the
name ``Smith Barney'' in the United States and Australia and operated
under the name ``Quilter'' in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Channel
Islands. Certain investment advisory and other businesses of Citigroup
were also contributed, including Citigroup's Consulting Group and the
sponsorship of the TRAK Program. In the case of Morgan Stanley, the
contributed businesses consisted generally of Morgan Stanley's global
wealth management (retail brokerage) and private wealth management
businesses. According to the Applicants, no valuations for the
contributed businesses were agreed upon between the parties. It was
agreed, however, that the value of the Smith Barney business plus $2.75
billion would equal an ownership percentage of 49% of the Joint Venture
entity, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (Holdings), a Delaware
limited liability company (together with its subsidiaries, MSSB). The
closing date of the Joint Venture Transaction occurred on May 31, 2009
(the Closing).
Prior to the Closing, Morgan Stanley had formed Holdings, the sole
member of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, which conducts most of the
Joint Venture's domestic operations as a dual-registered broker-dealer
and investment adviser. Holdings presently generates about $14 billion
in net revenues. It has 18,500 financial advisers, 1,000 locations
worldwide and services about 6.8 million households.
Immediately following the Closing, Morgan Stanley owned indirectly
through subsidiaries 51% of Holdings, and Citigroup owned 49% of
Holdings, through CGMI. Morgan Stanley has call rights to purchase from
Citigroup (a) an additional 14% of Holdings after the third anniversary
of Closing, (b) an additional 15% of Holdings after the fourth
anniversary and (c) the balance of Citigroup's interest in Holdings
after the fifth anniversary.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Applicants believe that Citgroup's ownership interest in
MSSB will reach a point where it will no longer have an interest in
MSSB or the Trust that could affect its best judgment as a
fiduciary. The Applicants explain that at such point in time, it
will no longer be necessary for Citigroup to rely on this exemption
for the TRAK Program. The Department expresses no opinion on when it
will no longer be necessary for Citigroup to rely on this exemption,
given that this will be a facts and circumstances determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. The Joint Venture Agreement was amended and restated on May 29,
2009 (the Amended Contribution Agreement). Under the Amended
Contribution Agreement, Citigroup transferred its managed futures
business and its proprietary investments to MSSB on July 31, 2009, in
exchange for a cash payment of $299.778 million paid by Morgan Stanley,
and Morgan Stanley purchased additional interests in MSSB worth
approximately $2.7 billion on August 1, 2009, in order to maintain its
total percentage of ownership interests in MSSB at 51%. The Amended
Contribution Agreement also provided for an ``introducing broker''
structure for a period of time after the Closing. Under the
``introducing broker'' structure, clients of Morgan Stanley's legacy
businesses continue to have their brokerage transactions cleared
through, and their accounts custodied and carried by, Morgan
Stanley.\10\ Similarly, customers of the Citigroup legacy businesses
continue to have their brokerage transactions cleared through, and have
their accounts custodied and carried by, CGMI.\11\ Over time, it is
expected that the contributed businesses and operations of Morgan
Stanley and Citigroup will be integrated into one operation and that
ultimately, MSSB will become a fully self-clearing and self-custody
service firm and will carry its own customer accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Morgan Stanley continues to provide an array of services
for these accounts which include clearing and settling securities
transactions, providing trade confirmations and customer statements
and performing certain cashiering functions, custody services and
other related services.
\11\ CGMI clears and settles securities transactions, provides
trade confirmations and customer statements and performs certain
cashiering functions, custody services and other related services
for these accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current Status of Operations
10. Since the Closing, MSSB's advisory services are being provided
through two distribution channels. One distribution channel generally
sponsors the advisory programs, including the TRAK Program, previously
sponsored by Smith Barney and/or CGMI (the SB Channel). Therefore,
since the Closing, the TRAK Program has continued to be made available
to customers of the SB Channel. The other distribution channel
generally sponsors the advisory programs previously sponsored by Morgan
Stanley's Global Wealth Management Group (the MS Channel). As stated
previously, the parties' ultimate goal is for the businesses,
operations and systems of the MS Channel and the SB Channel to be
integrated. However, decisions as to which programs will be offered to
[[Page 33349]]
whom or which programs will survive over the long-term have not been
made.
11. Also, since the Closing, CGMI has continued to offer the TRAK
Program to its retained clients. As of August 31, 2009, the TRAK
Program had assets in excess of $6.13 billion, over $3.74 billion of
which is held in Plan accounts. At present, the investments under the
TRAK Program encompass the Trust, which consists of eleven Portfolios,
as well as the Stable Value Investments Fund, a collective trust fund
established and maintained by First State. The Trust and the Stable
Value Investment Fund are advised by one or more unaffiliated Sub-
Advisers selected by MSSB and First State, respectively. In addition to
the TRAK Program, CGMI offers other investment advisory programs to its
retained clients under an advisory services agreement between Citigroup
and Holdings dated as of the Closing. Under the agreement, Holdings
provides a wide range of investment advisory services to Citigroup
advisory programs pursuant to a delegation by Citigroup to Holdings of
certain of Citigroup's obligations to provide such services. Citigroup
retained clients were provided notice of this arrangement.
Descriptions of Revisions to the Operative Language of PTE 2009-12
12. The proposed exemption generally modifies the operative
language of PTE 2009-12 to take into account the new ownership
structure of the TRAK Program formed as a result of the Joint Venture
Transaction. Section I of PTE 2009-12 has been modified to conform the
effective date of the proposal with the closing of the Joint Venture
Transaction, May 31, 2009. In addition, the operative language in
Section I(A) and I(B) has been revised to provide that, as a result of
the Joint Venture, MSSB rather than Citigroup is now the sponsor of the
Trust in connection with Plans' investment in the TRAK Program, and
that investment advisory services may be provided by MSSB in addition
to CGMI, respectively.
13. Section II of PTE 2009-12, General Conditions, has been
modified throughout by replacing the terms ``CGMI,'' ``Consulting
Group,'' or ``Citigroup,'' with the term ``Adviser,'' which has been
added as a new defined term in Section III to mean ``CGMI or MSSB as
investment adviser to Plans.'' The changes were made to these terms in
order to reflect the addition of MSSB as a sponsor of the TRAK Program
resulting from the Joint Venture Transaction. In addition, in Section
II(h), the term ``Affiliated Entities,'' which has been added as a new
defined term in Section III to mean ``Morgan Stanley, CGMI, MSSB, and
their respective affiliates,'' has been added to take into account the
addition of MSSB as a sponsor of the TRAK Program.
14. Section II(j) of PTE 2009-12 has been modified to reflect the
fact that CGMI has been removed from the reallocation formula because
it no longer manages and supervises the Trust and the Portfolios. Prior
to the Closing, Citigroup Investment Advisory Services LLC (CIAS), an
affiliate of CGMI, managed and supervised the Trust and Portfolios. In
connection with the Joint Venture Transactions, CIAS was contributed to
MSSB and as an affiliate of MSSB, it manages and supervises the Trust
and the Portfolios. Thus, the modifications to the language in Section
II(j) seek to clarify the parties to the covered transactions, but do
not change the formula for the calculation of the quarterly investment
advisory fee that is paid by the Plan to the Adviser. Furthermore,
Section II(j) has been amended to correct the names of the Portfolios
that are excluded from the calculation of the quarterly investment
advisory fee, namely by substituting the term ``Money Markets
Investment Portfolio'' for ``Government Money Investments Portfolio,''
and the term ``Stable Value Investments Portfolio'' for ``GIC Fund.''
15. Section III of PTE 2009-12, which sets forth the Definitions,
has been modified by: (i) Adding Section III(a), Adviser, to mean
``CGMI or MSSB as investment adviser to Plans'' to reflect the new
sponsorship of the TRAK Program by MSSB, in addition to the previous
sponsorship by CGMI; (ii) adding Section III(b), Affiliated Entities,
to mean ``Morgan Stanley, CGMI, MSSB and their respective affiliates''
to reflect the addition of MSSB as a sponsor of the TRAK Program
resulting from the Joint Venture Transaction; (iii) substituting the
term ``Affiliated Entities'' for ``CGMI'' throughout Section III(d) in
order to broaden the scope of the term ``affiliate'' to capture the
current affiliates of the Applicants; (iv) amending the sectional
references in Sections III(d)(2) and (3) to conform to the
corresponding modifications to Section III; (v) amending the definition
of ``Independent Plan Fiduciary'' in Section III(e) so that the
Independent Plan Fiduciary is independent of MSSB in addition to CGMI
and their respective affiliates, thereby preserving the purpose of the
provisions in PTE 2009-12 that provide that only a party independent of
the Applicants is exercising discretion with respect to, among other
things, Plans' decisions to invest in the TRAK Program; and (vi) adding
a new definition of ``MSSB'' in Section III(f) to mean ``Morgan Stanley
Smith Barney Holdings LLC, together with its affiliates.''
16. Section IV of PTE 2009-12, pertaining to exemptive relief for
the temporary and limited exception to the definition of the term
``affiliate,'' has been stricken since it is no longer applicable.
Previously, Section IV provided that, during the three month period of
time within which Citigroup held a 10% or greater economic ownership
interest in Legg Mason, the Sub-Advisers would continue to be
considered ``independent'' of CGMI and its affiliates for purposes of
Section II(h) and not ``affiliated'' with CGMI and its affiliates for
purposes of Section III(b) of the exemption. Because the time period
has expired, Section IV is no longer relevant to the exemption.
Finally, the Effective Date in new Section IV is modified to
provide that the exemption, if granted, will be effective as of May 31,
2009, which is the closing date of the Joint Venture Transaction.
Summary
17. In summary, the Applicant represents that the transactions
described herein have satisfied or will satisfy the statutory criteria
for an exemption set forth in section 408(a) of the Act because:
(a) The participation of Plans in the TRAK Program has been
approved or will be approved by an Independent Plan Fiduciary;
(b) The total fees paid to the Adviser and its affiliates has
constituted or will constitute no more than reasonable compensation;
(c) No Plan has paid or will pay a fee or commission by reason of
the acquisition or redemption of shares in the Trust;
(d) The terms of each purchase or redemption of Trust shares have
remained or will remain at least as favorable to an investing Plan as
those obtainable in an arm's length transaction with an unrelated
party;
(e) The Adviser has provided or will provide written documentation
to an Independent Plan Fiduciary of its recommendations or evaluations
based upon objective criteria, and such recommendation or evaluation
has been implemented or will be implemented only at the express
direction of such Independent Plan Fiduciary.
(f) The Adviser has given or will give investment advice in writing
to an Independent Plan Fiduciary with respect to all available
Portfolios (with respect to participant directed plans,
[[Page 33350]]
such advice is limited to the Portfolios made available under the
Plan);
(g) Any Sub-Adviser that acts for the Trust to exercise investment
discretion over a Portfolio has been independent or will be independent
of Morgan Stanley, CGMI, MSSB and their respective affiliates;
(h) Immediately following the acquisition by a Portfolio of Adviser
Common Stock, the percentage of that Portfolio's net assets invested in
such securities generally has not exceeded or will not exceed one
percent;
(i) The quarterly investment advisory fee that is paid by a Plan to
the Adviser for investment advisory services rendered to such Plan has
been offset or will be offset by any amount in excess of 20 basis
points that MSSB retains from any Portfolio (with the exception of the
Money Market Investments Portfolio and the Stable Value Investments
Portfolio for which neither MSSB nor the Trust will retain any
investment management fee) which contains investments attributable to
the Plan investor;
(j) With respect to its participation in the TRAK Program, prior to
purchasing Trust shares, each Plan has received or will receive written
or oral disclosures and offering materials from the Adviser which
generally disclose all material facts concerning the purpose,
structure, operation, and investment in the TRAK Program, and describe
the Adviser's recommendations or evaluations, including the reasons and
objective criteria forming the basis for such recommendations or
evaluations;
(k) Subsequent to its participation in the TRAK Program, each Plan
has received or will receive periodic written disclosures from the
Adviser with respect to the financial condition of the TRAK Program,
the total fees that it and its affiliates will receive from such Plans
and the value of the Plan's interest in the TRAK Program, and on a
quarterly and annual basis, written disclosures to all Plans of (a) the
percentage of each Portfolio's brokerage commissions that are paid to
the Affiliated Entities and (b) the average brokerage commission per
share paid by each Portfolio to the Affiliated Entities, as compared to
the average brokerage commission per share paid by the Trust to brokers
other than the Affiliated Entities, both expressed as cents per share;
and
(l) The Adviser has complied with, and will continue to comply
with, the recordkeeping requirements provided in Section II(m) of the
proposed exemption, for so long as such records are required to be
maintained.
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemption will be mailed by first class mail
to the Independent Plan Fiduciary of each Plan currently participating
in the TRAK Program, or, in the case of a Plan covered by Section
404(c) of the Act, to the recordholder of the Trust shares. Such notice
will be given within 45 days of the publication of the notice of
pendency in the Federal Register. The notice will contain a copy of the
notice of proposed exemption, as published in the Federal Register, and
a supplemental statement, as required pursuant to 29 CFR 2570.43(b)(2).
The supplemental statement will inform interested persons of their
right to comment on and/or to request a hearing with respect to the
pending exemption. Written comments and hearing requests are due within
75 days of the publication of the proposed exemption in the Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Blinder of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8553. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Boston Carpenters Apprenticeship and Training Fund (the Fund) Located
in Boston, Massachusetts
[Exemption Application No: L-11624]
Proposed Exemption
The Department of Labor is considering granting an exemption under
the authority of section 408(a) of the Act in accordance with
procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990). If the proposed exemption is granted, the
restrictions of 406(b)(1), and 406(b)(2) of the Act shall not apply
effective for the period from January 29, 2010, through June 30, 2010,
to the lease (the Lease) by the Fund from the NERCC, LLC (the Building
Corporation), a party in interest with respect to the Fund, of a
condominium unit (the Condo) in a building (the Building) owned by the
Building Corporation, where the New England Regional Council of
Carpenters (the Union), also a party in interest with respect to the
Fund, indirectly owns the only other condominium unit in the Building;
provided that, at the time the transaction was entered into, the
following conditions were satisfied:
(a) The proposed exemption is conditioned upon satisfaction at all
times of the terms and conditions of this exemption, and upon adherence
to the material facts and representations, as described in this
proposed exemption, and, as set forth in application D-11624, and in
application D-11558, including those representations that are required
by 29 CFR 2570.34 and 29 CFR 2570.35 of the Department's regulations;
(b) prior to entering into the Lease, the Fund sought legal advice
from Aaron D. Krakow, Esq. (Mr. Krakow), acting as legal counsel on
behalf of the Fund, who advised the Fund that it was permissible for
the Fund to enter into a short term lease with the Building
Corporation, and the Board of Trustees of the Fund (the Board) relied
on Mr. Krakow's advice;
(c) the Lease which is the subject of this exemption and any other
leasing arrangement of the Condo between the Fund and the Building
Corporation and/or the Union, if not terminated sooner, shall terminate
on the date that the Fund closes on the purchase of the Condo from the
Building Corporation; and the Fund shall have no obligation to pay rent
to the Union or to the Building Corporation after the date of such
termination;
(d) before the Fund entered into the Lease of the Condo, James F.
Grosso, Esq. (Mr. Grosso), of O'Reilly, Grosso & Gross, PC, acting as
attorney for the Fund, assisted in the negotiation of the terms of the
Lease, reviewed and approved the terms of such Lease to ensure that
such terms are at least as favorable to the Fund as an arm's length
transaction with an unrelated party, determined that such terms are
fair and reasonable, and selected an independent, qualified appraiser
to determine the fair market rental value of the Condo;
(e) Mr. Grosso is responsible throughout the duration of the Lease
for: (i) Monitoring the rent payments made by the Fund to ensure that
such payments are consistent with the amount of rental specified under
the terms of such Lease, (ii) monitoring the payments of the Fund's
share of the expenses for taxes, insurance, and operating expenses
(including repairs) to ensure that such payments represent a fair
apportionment of such expenses; and (iii) determining that the Fund has
sufficient assets to pay the rental amount and its portion of taxes,
insurance, and operating expenses (including repairs);
(f) throughout the duration of the Lease, the terms of the Lease of
the Condo between the Fund and the Building Corporation are at all
times satisfied;
(g) the rent paid by the Fund for the Condo under the terms of the
Lease is at no time greater than the fair market rental value of the
Condo, as determined by an independent, qualified appraiser selected by
Mr. Grosso;
[[Page 33351]]
(h) under the provisions of the Lease, the subject transaction is
on terms and at all times remains on terms that are at least as
favorable to the Fund as those that would have been negotiated under
similar circumstances at arm's length with an unrelated third party;
(i) the transaction is appropriate and helpful in carrying out the
purposes for which the Fund is established or maintained;
(j) the Board maintains, or causes to be maintained within the
United States for a period of six (6) years in a manner that is
convenient and accessible for audit and examination, such records as
are necessary to enable the persons described, below, in paragraph
(k)(1) of this exemption to determine whether the conditions of this
exemption have been met; except that--
(1) if the records necessary to enable the persons described,
below, in paragraph (k)(1) of this exemption to determine whether the
conditions of this exemption have been met are lost or destroyed, due
to circumstances beyond the control of the Board, then no prohibited
transaction will be considered to have occurred solely on the basis of
the unavailability of those records; and
(2) No party in interest, other than the Board shall be subject to
the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act,
or to the taxes imposed by section 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, if the
records are not maintained, or are not available for examination as
required by paragraph (j) of this exemption; and
(k)(1) Except as provided, below, in paragraph (k)(2) of this
exemption and notwithstanding any provisions of sections (a)(2) and (b)
of section 504 of the Act, the records referred to in paragraph (j) of
this exemption are unconditionally available at their customary
location for examination during normal business hours by:
(A) Any duly authorized employee or representative of the
Department, the Internal Revenue Service, or any other applicable
federal or state regulatory agency;
(B) Any fiduciary of the Fund, or any duly authorized
representative of such fiduciary;
(C) Any contributing employer to the Fund and any employee
organization whose members are covered by the Fund, or any duly
authorized employee or representative of these entities; or
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of the Fund, or any duly
authorized representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described, above, in paragraph (k)(1)(B)-
(D) of this exemption are authorized to examine trade secrets or
commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. The Union is a labor organization made up of thirty (30) local
carpenter unions in six (6) New England states. The local unions that
are affiliated with the Union include local union nos. 33, 40, 67, 218,
and 723 (the Locals). Members of the Union are covered by the Fund. The
Union and the Locals are parties in interest with respect to the Fund,
pursuant to section 3(14)(D) of the Act, as employee organizations any
of whose members are covered by such Fund.
2. The Fund is an employee welfare benefit plan, as that term is
defined in the Act. Further, the Fund is a multiemployer apprenticeship
and training fund. The Fund is a Massachusetts nonprofit organization,
and is exempt from income taxes under the provisions of Section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
3. The Fund provides training and education to carpenter
apprentices in the greater Boston area. The Fund also provides training
and education to journeymen carpenters in the greater Boston area.
4. The Fund is maintained under collective bargaining agreements
negotiated between the Union of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters
and Joiners of America (the UBCJA) and the following multiemployer
bargaining organizations: (a) The Labor Relations Division of the
Associated General Contractors of Massachusetts, Inc.; (b) The Building
Trades Employers' Association of Boston and Eastern Massachusetts,
Inc.; and (c) The Labor Relations Division of the Construction Industry
of Massachusetts (collectively, the Employer Associations). Employers
any of whose employees are covered by the Fund, are parties in interest
with respect to the Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(C) of the Act. The
UBCJA is a party in interest with respect to the Fund, pursuant to
section 3(14)(D) of the Act, as an employee organization any of whose
members are covered by such Fund.
5. The Board has the authority to invest the assets of the Fund.
The Board and the members of the Board, as persons who have investment
discretion over the assets of the Fund, are fiduciaries with respect to
the Fund, pursuant to section 3(21)(A) of the Act. As a fiduciaries of
the Fund, the Board and the members of the Board are also parties in
interest with respect to such Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(A) of the
Act.
The Board consists of six (6) labor representatives and six (6)
management representatives. Among the labor representatives serving on
the Board are Joseph Power (Mr. Power), Thomas Flynn, Steve Tewksbury,
Charles MacFarlane, Richard Pedi (Mr. Pedi), and Richard Scaramozza.
All of the labor representatives on the Board are Union employees and
members of various locals affiliated with the Union. Mr. Power, one of
the labor representatives on the Board, also serves on the Executive
Board of the Union.
The representatives of management serving on the Board are Donald
MacKinnon (Mr. MacKinnon), Tom Gunning, III, George Allen (Mr. Allen),
William Fitzgerald, Christopher Pennie, and Mark DeNapoli (Mr.
DeNapoli).
It is represented that the Board, and more specifically the Finance
Committee of the Board, each meet monthly, and at those meetings review
the Fund's finances for the month, including the Fund's payments to the
Union for rent and for the Fund's share of taxes, insurance, and
operating expenses (including repairs) in connection with the Lease of
the Condo to the Fund.
6. In the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, the Fund received
employer contributions of $2,584,069, based on approximately 6.7
million hours of work. In addition, the Fund received other income of
approximately $189,000. As of September 30, 2008, the Fund had expenses
of $2,254,078 and total assets of $5,910,043. Included in the Fund's
total assets is a parcel of improved real property (the Existing
Facility) located at 385 Market Street in the Brighton section of
Boston, Massachusetts.
7. Until February 2010 when construction on the Condo was
completed, the Fund provided all of its classes and training in the
Existing Facility. Purchased in 1975, from an unrelated third party,
the Fund owns the Existing Facility free and clear of any mortgages. In
February of 2010, the Fund entered into a purchase and sale agreement
for the Existing Facility with Eli Jammal of Brookline Development, an
unrelated party, for $1.5 million. It is represented that the sales
price of the Existing Facility is $210,000 more than the net book value
of the Existing Facility carried on the 2008 audited financial
statement of the Fund.
8. On February 1, 2008, the Union purchased for cash in the amount
of $5.8 million, a parcel of improved real property (the Original
Property) from an unrelated third party. The Original
[[Page 33352]]
Property is described as a 48,000 square foot two-story building on a
64,000 square foot lot located at 750 Dorchester Avenue, in Boston,
Massachusetts. When purchased, the Union planned to renovate and expand
the Original Property.
9. The Union established the Building Corporation as a limited
liability company for the purpose of developing the Original Property.
In this regard, the Union contributed the Original Property to the
Building Corporation in exchange for sole interest in the Building
Corporation. The Building Corporation is a party in interest with
respect to the Fund, pursuant to section 3(14)(G) of the Act, as 50
percent (50%) or more of the interests in the Building Corporation are
owned by the Union.
10. Construction on the renovation and expansion of the Original
Property began in January 2009. As of February 2010, the Union had
completed the renovation and expansion of the Original Property and had
separated the Building into two (2) condominium units. The Union owns
one of the condominium units through its ownership of the Building
Corporation, and the Building Corporation intends to sell the other
condominium unit to the Fund.
On February 24, 2009, the Fund filed an application (L-11558) with
the Department seeking an administrative exemption to permit the Fund
to purchase the Condo. The Department published a Notice of Proposed
Exemption (the Notice) in the Federal Register on December 22,
2009.\12\ In this regard, appearing elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, the Department is publishing a final exemption for
the purchase of the Condo by the Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\74 FR 68120.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. In order that the Fund could hold its spring 2010 classes in
the Condo and in order to establish a closing date with the prospective
purchaser of the Existing Facility, the Board decided to pursue the
option of renting the Condo to the Fund for a short term until the Fund
could obtain financing to close on the purchase of the Condo and could
obtain a final exemption from the Department to permit the Fund to
purchase the Condo from the Building Corporation.
12. It is represented that the Board retained its management co-
counsel, Mr. Grosso of O'Reilly, Grosso & Gross, PC to represent the
Fund in the leasing transaction. It is represented that Mr. Grosso is
independent in that he has never represented the Building Corporation
and does not provide legal services to the Union. Mr. Grosso is
qualified in that he is an attorney representing employers and
management in labor relations matters, primarily in the construction
industry.
It is represented that the responsibilities of Mr. Grosso, acting
as attorney on behalf of the Fund, included obtaining an appraisal of
the fair market rental value of the Condo.
13. On January 15, 2010, Mr. Grosso obtained an appraisal of the
fair market rental value of the Condo from CBRE/CB Richard Ellis
(CBRE). James T. Moore (Mr. Moore), Senior Vice President/Partner of
CBRE and Harris E. Collins (Mr. Collins), Senior Vice President/P