Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans (PPOHA) Program, 31338-31340 [2010-13318]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
31338
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
advantages and disadvantages of
affiliated lending practices?
4. State and Local Experience. State
and local consumer and enforcement
agencies, through their investigatory
and prosecutorial experiences, may be
able to contribute valuable information
regarding practices that steer consumers
to overpriced settlement service
providers, as well as provide
information about successful and
unsuccessful means of preventing such
abuse. To these agencies especially,
HUD asks:
(a) What has been and continues to be
the impact of state and local regulatory
enforcement in this area?
(b) What rules and forms of
enforcement have proven most
effective?
(c) Is there evidence available
regarding specific anticompetitive or
anticonsumer practices that can be
provided by state law enforcement?
(d) Can state laws regulating builderaffiliated business arrangements provide
an approach for evaluating options?
5. One-Stop Shopping. In the process
of withdrawing the revised definition of
‘‘required use’’ in the November 17,
2008, RESPA final rule, HUD received
comments indicating that limiting
referrals to affiliates adversely affects
one-stop shopping options that could
benefit consumers. Accordingly, HUD
asks whether there is any way to
quantify the benefit to homebuyers of
one-stop shopping. Additionally, is
there any evidence that homebuyers
derive greater benefit from one-stop
shopping than from comparison
shopping for the best loan terms and
settlement costs?
6. Incentives vs. Disincentives or
Penalties. HUD requests comments on
the relationship between incentives to
use an affiliated settlement service
provider and disincentives or penalties
for using a nonaffiliated settlement
service provider, and how incentives
and disincentives might be treated in
the new regulation. To assist in the
development of distinctions or
equivalencies between incentives and
disincentives, HUD asks for information
concerning cases where an incentive to
use a certain provider would not have
the same effect as a disincentive for
failure to use another provider.
While HUD specifically seeks
comments on the foregoing questions,
HUD welcomes additional information
that will help inform HUD’s views on
this issue.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:01 Jun 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: May 27, 2010.
David H. Stevens,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2010–13350 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
Promoting Postbaccalaureate
Opportunities for Hispanic Americans
(PPOHA) Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Proposed requirements.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Postsecondary Education proposes
requirements under the PPOHA
Program. The Assistant Secretary may
use one or more of these requirements
for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2010
and later years. We take this action to
establish appropriate requirements for
the PPOHA Program. We have based
these requirements on existing rules for
the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI)
Program, authorized by Title V of the
Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended (HEA), because the PPOHA
Program and the HSI Program are
governed by some common provisions
and support similar institutions. We are
proposing to limit the number of
applications an eligible institution can
submit under the PPOHA to ensure that
more HSIs have an opportunity for
assistance under the PPOHA Program.
We are also proposing a limitation on
the use of PPOHA Program funds for
direct student assistance to ensure that
institutions use the grant funds to best
meet the broad purposes of the statute.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before July 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Dr. Maria E. Carrington,
U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K
Street, NW., Room 6036, Washington,
DC 20006–8513.
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
maria.carrington@ed.gov. You must
include the term ‘‘PPOHA Program
Notice of Proposed Requirements’’ in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Maria E. Carrington: (202) 502–7548, or
by e-mail: maria.carrington@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding this
notice. To ensure that your comments
have maximum effect in developing the
notice of final requirements, we urge
you to identify clearly the specific
proposed requirement that each
comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed requirements. Please let
us know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in Room 6036, 1990 K
Street, NW., Washington, DC, between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purposes of
the PPOHA Program are to: (1) Expand
postbaccalaureate educational
opportunities for, and improve the
academic attainment of, Hispanic
students; and (2) expand the
postbaccalaureate academic offerings as
well as enhance the program quality in
the institutions of higher education that
are educating the majority of Hispanic
college students and helping large
numbers of Hispanic and low-income
students complete postsecondary
degrees.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C.1102–1102c,
20 U.S.C.1161aa–1.
Proposed Requirements
Background
The PPOHA Program is authorized by
Title V, part B, sections 511 through 514
of the HEA. It was added to the HEA by
the Higher Education Opportunity Act
of 2008, Public Law 110–315. The
PPOHA Program supports HSIs that
offer a postbaccalaureate certificate or
degree granting program.
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
There are overlapping statutory
provisions that govern both the PPOHA
Program and the HSI Program, which is
authorized by sections 501 to 504 of the
HEA. For example, in defining the term
‘‘Hispanic-serving institution’’ for
purposes of the PPOHA Program,
Congress adopted the definition of that
term from the program authority for the
HSI Program. In addition, the PPOHA
Program provides development grants
like the HSI Program. Congress also
applied the general provisions of the
HSI Program (see sections 521 through
528 of the HEA) to the PPOHA Program.
In FY 2009, the Department
conducted its first grant competition
under the PPOHA Program. Under the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), the Department can establish
requirements for the first competition it
holds under a new or substantially
revised program authority without
subjecting those requirements to the
Administrative Procedure Act’s
rulemaking requirements. (See section
437(d)(1) of GEPA). The Department
established requirements for the FY
2009 PPOHA Program grant competition
in a notice inviting applications that it
published in the Federal Register on
June 18, 2009 (74 FR 28913). The
requirements established for the FY
2009 grant competition included (1)
using the HSI Program regulations in 34
CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and 34 CFR 606.3
through 606.5 for purposes of
determining eligibility for the PPOHA
Program and (2) using the ‘‘tie-breaker
for development grants’’ provisions from
the HSI Program regulations in 34 CFR
606.23(b)(1) and (b)(2). Given the
overlap between the PPOHA Program
and the HSI Program, the Department
determined that it was appropriate to
use these regulations from the HSI
program for the PPOHA Program.
Congress has appropriated $22
million for the PPOHA Program for FY
2010. To conduct an effective
competition using these funds, the
Department has determined that it is
necessary to establish requirements for
the FY 2010 competition and for future
competitions under the PPOHA
Program. Specifically, we propose again
to use the HSI Program regulations in 34
CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and 34 CFR 606.3
through 606.5 for purposes of
determining eligibility, and the
regulations in 34 CFR 606.23(b)(1) and
(b)(2) for breaking ties for development
grants in this competition.
As we explained in the notice inviting
applications for the FY 2009
competition, we believe these
requirements are appropriate for the
following reasons:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Jun 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
Eligibility Criteria (Use of 34 CFR
606.2(a) and (b), 606.3 through 606.5).
The regulations for the HSI Program (34
CFR part 606) include eligibility criteria
for a ‘‘Hispanic-serving institution’’ as
used in section 502 of the HEA (20
U.S.C. 1101a). The definition of a
‘‘Hispanic-serving institution’’ in section
502 of the HEA also applies to the
PPOHA Program. Accordingly, we are
using the eligibility criteria from the HSI
Program (34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and
606.3, 606.4, and 606.5) for the PPOHA
Program. The use of these regulations
will enable applicants under the
PPOHA Program to determine whether
they meet the definitional requirements
of an HSI.
Tie-breaker for Development Grants
(Use of 34 CFR 606.23(b)(1) and (b)(2)).
Through the PPOHA Program, the
Department provides development
grants like those currently awarded
under the HSI Program. In light of the
similar eligibility criteria for these two
programs, the Assistant Secretary has
decided to adopt for the PPOHA
Program the regulations for tie-breakers
used in the HSI Program.
In addition to the eligibility and tie
breaker requirements, we also propose
to establish the following two additional
requirements:
(1) A limitation on the number of
applications an eligible institution can
submit under the PPOHA Program.
(2) A limitation on the use of PPOHA
Program funds for direct student
assistance.
We propose to limit the number of
applications an eligible institution can
submit under the PPOHA Program to
one per fiscal year. This proposed
limitation would ensure that more HSIs
have an opportunity for assistance
under the PPOHA Program.
We also propose to limit the amount
of PPOHA Program funds a grantee can
use to provide direct student assistance
to no more than 20 percent. While
section 513(a)(4) of the HEA allows
grant funds to be used to support lowincome, postbaccalaureate students with
scholarships, fellowships, and other
financial assistance to permit the
enrollment of these students in
postbaccalaureate certificate or degreegranting programs, the primary
emphasis of the PPOHA Program is to
expand postbaccalaureate academic
offerings and enhance program quality
rather than to provide direct student
financial assistance.
Proposed Requirements
The Assistant Secretary proposes the
following requirements for this program.
We may apply one or more of these
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
31339
requirements in any year in which this
program is in effect.
Proposed Requirement 1—Eligibility
Criteria (Use of 34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b),
606.3 Through 606.5)
Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI): To
qualify as an eligible HSI for the
Promoting Postbaccalaureate
Opportunities for Hispanic Americans
(PPOHA) Program under sections 502
and 512(b) of the Higher Education Act
of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C.
1101a and 1102a), an institution of
higher education (IHE) must—
(a) Have an enrollment of needy
students, as defined in section 502(b) of
the HEA (section 502(a)(2)(A)(i) of the
HEA; 20 U.S.C. 1101a(a)(2)(A)(i));
(b) Have, except as provided in
section 522(b) of the HEA, average
educational and general expenditures
that are low, per full-time equivalent
(FTE) undergraduate student, in
comparison with the average
educational and general expenditures
per FTE undergraduate student of
institutions that offer similar instruction
(section 502(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the HEA; 20
U.S.C. 1101a(a)(2)(A)(ii));
Note: To demonstrate an enrollment of
needy students and low average educational
and general expenditures per FTE
undergraduate student, an IHE must be
designated as an ‘‘eligible institution’’ in
accordance with 34 CFR 606.3 through 606.5
and the notice inviting applications for
designation as an eligible institution for the
fiscal year for which the grant competition is
being conducted.
(c) Be accredited by a nationally
recognized accrediting agency or
association that the Secretary has
determined to be a reliable authority as
to the quality of education or training
offered, or making reasonable progress
toward accreditation, according to such
an agency or association (section
502(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C.
1101a(a)(2)(A)(iv));
(d) Be legally authorized to provide,
and provide within the State, an
educational program for which the
institution awards a bachelor’s degree
(section 502(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the HEA; 20
U.S.C. 1101a(a)(2)(A)(iii)); and
(e) Have an enrollment of
undergraduate FTE students that is at
least 25 percent Hispanic students at the
end of the award year immediately
preceding the date of application
(section 502(a)(5)(B) of the HEA; 20
U.S.C. 1101a(a)(5)(B)).
Note 1: Funds for the PPOHA Program will
be awarded each fiscal year; thus, for this
program, the ‘‘end of the award year
immediately preceding the date of
application’’ refers to the end of the fiscal
year prior to the application due date. The
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
31340
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 106 / Thursday, June 3, 2010 / Proposed Rules
end of the fiscal year occurs on September 30
for any given year.
Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended.
Note 2: In considering applications for
grants under this program, the Department
will compare the data and documentation the
institution relied on in its application with
data reported to the Department’s Integrated
Postsecondary Education Data System
(IPEDS), the IHE’s State-reported enrollment
data, and the institutional annual report. If
different percentages or data are reported in
these various sources, the institution must, as
part of the eligibility process, explain the
reason for the differences. If the IPEDS data
show that less than 25 percent of the
institution’s undergraduate FTE students are
Hispanic, the burden is on the institution to
show that the IPEDS data are inaccurate. If
the IPEDS data indicate that the institution
has an undergraduate FTE less than 25
percent, and the institution fails to
demonstrate that the IPEDS data are
inaccurate, the institution will be considered
ineligible.
Proposed Requirement 4—Limit on Use
of Funds for Direct Student Assistance
Proposed Requirement 2—Use of TieBreaking Factors
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
To resolve ties in the reader scores of
applications for development grants, the
Department will award one additional
point to an application from an
institution of higher education (IHE)
that has an endowment fund for which
the market value per full-time
equivalent (FTE) student is less than the
comparable average current market
value of the endowment funds per FTE
student at similar type IHEs. In
addition, to resolve ties in the reader
scores of applications for PPHOA
development grants, the Department
will award one additional point to an
application from an IHE that has
expenditures for library materials per
FTE student that are less than the
comparable average expenditures for
library materials per FTE student at
similar type IHEs. (34 CFR 606.23(a)(1)
and (2)).
For the purpose of these funding
considerations, we will use 2008–2009
data.
If a tie remains after applying the tiebreaker mechanism above, priority will
be given for Individual Development
Grants to applicants that have the
lowest endowment values per FTE
student. (34 CFR § 606.23(b)(1))
Proposed Requirement 3—Limit on
Applications From an Eligible
Institution
In any fiscal year, an eligible
institution may submit only one
application for a grant under the
PPOHA Program. This restriction is
intended to ensure that more Hispanicserving institutions have an opportunity
for assistance under Title V of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:31 Jun 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
A PPOHA Program grantee may use
no more than 20 percent of its total
PPOHA Program grant award to provide
financial support—in the form of
scholarships, fellowships, and other
student financial assistance—to lowincome students.
Final Requirements: We will
announce the final requirements in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final requirements after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing additional
requirements subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use one or more of these requirements, we
invite applications through a notice in the
Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
proposed regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed requirements
justify the costs.
We have determined, also, that this
proposed regulatory action does not
unduly interfere with State, local, and
Tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Daniel T. Madzelan, Director,
Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the
Office of Postsecondary Education, to
perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.031M.
Dated: May 25, 2010.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010–13318 Filed 6–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0158; FRL–9158–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone and the 1997 and
2006 Fine Particulate Matter National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
submittals from the State of Delaware
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA)
sections 110(k)(2) and (3). These
submittals address the infrastructure
elements specified in the CAA section
110(a)(2) necessary to implement,
maintain, and enforce the 1997 8-hour
ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS), and the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
This proposed action is limited to the
E:\FR\FM\03JNP1.SGM
03JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31338-31340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13318]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic Americans
(PPOHA) Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Proposed requirements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education proposes
requirements under the PPOHA Program. The Assistant Secretary may use
one or more of these requirements for competitions in fiscal year (FY)
2010 and later years. We take this action to establish appropriate
requirements for the PPOHA Program. We have based these requirements on
existing rules for the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Program,
authorized by Title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA), because the PPOHA Program and the HSI Program are governed by
some common provisions and support similar institutions. We are
proposing to limit the number of applications an eligible institution
can submit under the PPOHA to ensure that more HSIs have an opportunity
for assistance under the PPOHA Program. We are also proposing a
limitation on the use of PPOHA Program funds for direct student
assistance to ensure that institutions use the grant funds to best meet
the broad purposes of the statute.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before July 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Dr. Maria E.
Carrington, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street, NW., Room
6036, Washington, DC 20006-8513.
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: maria.carrington@ed.gov. You must include the term ``PPOHA
Program Notice of Proposed Requirements'' in the subject line of your
electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Maria E. Carrington: (202) 502-
7548, or by e-mail: maria.carrington@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
this notice. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final requirements, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific proposed requirement that each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
requirements. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in Room 6036, 1990 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purposes of the PPOHA Program are to: (1)
Expand postbaccalaureate educational opportunities for, and improve the
academic attainment of, Hispanic students; and (2) expand the
postbaccalaureate academic offerings as well as enhance the program
quality in the institutions of higher education that are educating the
majority of Hispanic college students and helping large numbers of
Hispanic and low-income students complete postsecondary degrees.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C.1102-1102c, 20 U.S.C.1161aa-1.
Proposed Requirements
Background
The PPOHA Program is authorized by Title V, part B, sections 511
through 514 of the HEA. It was added to the HEA by the Higher Education
Opportunity Act of 2008, Public Law 110-315. The PPOHA Program supports
HSIs that offer a postbaccalaureate certificate or degree granting
program.
[[Page 31339]]
There are overlapping statutory provisions that govern both the
PPOHA Program and the HSI Program, which is authorized by sections 501
to 504 of the HEA. For example, in defining the term ``Hispanic-serving
institution'' for purposes of the PPOHA Program, Congress adopted the
definition of that term from the program authority for the HSI Program.
In addition, the PPOHA Program provides development grants like the HSI
Program. Congress also applied the general provisions of the HSI
Program (see sections 521 through 528 of the HEA) to the PPOHA Program.
In FY 2009, the Department conducted its first grant competition
under the PPOHA Program. Under the General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), the Department can establish requirements for the first
competition it holds under a new or substantially revised program
authority without subjecting those requirements to the Administrative
Procedure Act's rulemaking requirements. (See section 437(d)(1) of
GEPA). The Department established requirements for the FY 2009 PPOHA
Program grant competition in a notice inviting applications that it
published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2009 (74 FR 28913). The
requirements established for the FY 2009 grant competition included (1)
using the HSI Program regulations in 34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and 34 CFR
606.3 through 606.5 for purposes of determining eligibility for the
PPOHA Program and (2) using the ``tie-breaker for development grants''
provisions from the HSI Program regulations in 34 CFR 606.23(b)(1) and
(b)(2). Given the overlap between the PPOHA Program and the HSI
Program, the Department determined that it was appropriate to use these
regulations from the HSI program for the PPOHA Program.
Congress has appropriated $22 million for the PPOHA Program for FY
2010. To conduct an effective competition using these funds, the
Department has determined that it is necessary to establish
requirements for the FY 2010 competition and for future competitions
under the PPOHA Program. Specifically, we propose again to use the HSI
Program regulations in 34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and 34 CFR 606.3 through
606.5 for purposes of determining eligibility, and the regulations in
34 CFR 606.23(b)(1) and (b)(2) for breaking ties for development grants
in this competition.
As we explained in the notice inviting applications for the FY 2009
competition, we believe these requirements are appropriate for the
following reasons:
Eligibility Criteria (Use of 34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b), 606.3 through
606.5). The regulations for the HSI Program (34 CFR part 606) include
eligibility criteria for a ``Hispanic-serving institution'' as used in
section 502 of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1101a). The definition of a
``Hispanic-serving institution'' in section 502 of the HEA also applies
to the PPOHA Program. Accordingly, we are using the eligibility
criteria from the HSI Program (34 CFR 606.2(a) and (b) and 606.3,
606.4, and 606.5) for the PPOHA Program. The use of these regulations
will enable applicants under the PPOHA Program to determine whether
they meet the definitional requirements of an HSI.
Tie-breaker for Development Grants (Use of 34 CFR 606.23(b)(1) and
(b)(2)). Through the PPOHA Program, the Department provides development
grants like those currently awarded under the HSI Program. In light of
the similar eligibility criteria for these two programs, the Assistant
Secretary has decided to adopt for the PPOHA Program the regulations
for tie-breakers used in the HSI Program.
In addition to the eligibility and tie breaker requirements, we
also propose to establish the following two additional requirements:
(1) A limitation on the number of applications an eligible
institution can submit under the PPOHA Program.
(2) A limitation on the use of PPOHA Program funds for direct
student assistance.
We propose to limit the number of applications an eligible
institution can submit under the PPOHA Program to one per fiscal year.
This proposed limitation would ensure that more HSIs have an
opportunity for assistance under the PPOHA Program.
We also propose to limit the amount of PPOHA Program funds a
grantee can use to provide direct student assistance to no more than 20
percent. While section 513(a)(4) of the HEA allows grant funds to be
used to support low-income, postbaccalaureate students with
scholarships, fellowships, and other financial assistance to permit the
enrollment of these students in postbaccalaureate certificate or
degree-granting programs, the primary emphasis of the PPOHA Program is
to expand postbaccalaureate academic offerings and enhance program
quality rather than to provide direct student financial assistance.
Proposed Requirements
The Assistant Secretary proposes the following requirements for
this program. We may apply one or more of these requirements in any
year in which this program is in effect.
Proposed Requirement 1--Eligibility Criteria (Use of 34 CFR 606.2(a)
and (b), 606.3 Through 606.5)
Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI): To qualify as an eligible HSI
for the Promoting Postbaccalaureate Opportunities for Hispanic
Americans (PPOHA) Program under sections 502 and 512(b) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C. 1101a and 1102a), an
institution of higher education (IHE) must--
(a) Have an enrollment of needy students, as defined in section
502(b) of the HEA (section 502(a)(2)(A)(i) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C.
1101a(a)(2)(A)(i));
(b) Have, except as provided in section 522(b) of the HEA, average
educational and general expenditures that are low, per full-time
equivalent (FTE) undergraduate student, in comparison with the average
educational and general expenditures per FTE undergraduate student of
institutions that offer similar instruction (section 502(a)(2)(A)(ii)
of the HEA; 20 U.S.C. 1101a(a)(2)(A)(ii));
Note: To demonstrate an enrollment of needy students and low
average educational and general expenditures per FTE undergraduate
student, an IHE must be designated as an ``eligible institution'' in
accordance with 34 CFR 606.3 through 606.5 and the notice inviting
applications for designation as an eligible institution for the
fiscal year for which the grant competition is being conducted.
(c) Be accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or
association that the Secretary has determined to be a reliable
authority as to the quality of education or training offered, or making
reasonable progress toward accreditation, according to such an agency
or association (section 502(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C.
1101a(a)(2)(A)(iv));
(d) Be legally authorized to provide, and provide within the State,
an educational program for which the institution awards a bachelor's
degree (section 502(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the HEA; 20 U.S.C.
1101a(a)(2)(A)(iii)); and
(e) Have an enrollment of undergraduate FTE students that is at
least 25 percent Hispanic students at the end of the award year
immediately preceding the date of application (section 502(a)(5)(B) of
the HEA; 20 U.S.C. 1101a(a)(5)(B)).
Note 1: Funds for the PPOHA Program will be awarded each fiscal
year; thus, for this program, the ``end of the award year
immediately preceding the date of application'' refers to the end of
the fiscal year prior to the application due date. The
[[Page 31340]]
end of the fiscal year occurs on September 30 for any given year.
Note 2: In considering applications for grants under this
program, the Department will compare the data and documentation the
institution relied on in its application with data reported to the
Department's Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS),
the IHE's State-reported enrollment data, and the institutional
annual report. If different percentages or data are reported in
these various sources, the institution must, as part of the
eligibility process, explain the reason for the differences. If the
IPEDS data show that less than 25 percent of the institution's
undergraduate FTE students are Hispanic, the burden is on the
institution to show that the IPEDS data are inaccurate. If the IPEDS
data indicate that the institution has an undergraduate FTE less
than 25 percent, and the institution fails to demonstrate that the
IPEDS data are inaccurate, the institution will be considered
ineligible.
Proposed Requirement 2--Use of Tie-Breaking Factors
To resolve ties in the reader scores of applications for
development grants, the Department will award one additional point to
an application from an institution of higher education (IHE) that has
an endowment fund for which the market value per full-time equivalent
(FTE) student is less than the comparable average current market value
of the endowment funds per FTE student at similar type IHEs. In
addition, to resolve ties in the reader scores of applications for
PPHOA development grants, the Department will award one additional
point to an application from an IHE that has expenditures for library
materials per FTE student that are less than the comparable average
expenditures for library materials per FTE student at similar type
IHEs. (34 CFR 606.23(a)(1) and (2)).
For the purpose of these funding considerations, we will use 2008-
2009 data.
If a tie remains after applying the tie-breaker mechanism above,
priority will be given for Individual Development Grants to applicants
that have the lowest endowment values per FTE student. (34 CFR Sec.
606.23(b)(1))
Proposed Requirement 3--Limit on Applications From an Eligible
Institution
In any fiscal year, an eligible institution may submit only one
application for a grant under the PPOHA Program. This restriction is
intended to ensure that more Hispanic-serving institutions have an
opportunity for assistance under Title V of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended.
Proposed Requirement 4--Limit on Use of Funds for Direct Student
Assistance
A PPOHA Program grantee may use no more than 20 percent of its
total PPOHA Program grant award to provide financial support--in the
form of scholarships, fellowships, and other student financial
assistance--to low-income students.
Final Requirements: We will announce the final requirements in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will determine the final
requirements after considering responses to this notice and other
information available to the Department. This notice does not preclude
us from proposing additional requirements subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use one or more of these requirements, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this proposed regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed requirements justify the costs.
We have determined, also, that this proposed regulatory action does
not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the
objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination
and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary of Education has delegated
authority to Daniel T. Madzelan, Director, Forecasting and Policy
Analysis for the Office of Postsecondary Education, to perform the
functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.031M.
Dated: May 25, 2010.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010-13318 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P