National Briquetting Corporation, a Subsidiary of Harsco, Also Known as Performix East Chicago, East Chicago, IN; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 30073-30074 [2010-12897]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
TA–W–73,044: Avaya Inc., Avaya
Worldwide Services Group, Global
Support Services (GSS)
Organization, Coppell, TX
TA–W–73,051: Maco, Inc., Shelby, NC
TA–W–73,115: Solvay Advanced
Polymers, Marietta, OH
TA–W–73,188: Hagemeyer North
America, working on Site at
Cummis Filtration, Lake Mills, IA
TA–W–73,439: A&S Building Systems, A
Division NCI Building Systems, Inc.,
Rocky Mount, NC
TA–W–73,572: Track Corporation,
Spring Lake, MI
TA–W–73,580: Rotodie Company, Inc.,
dba Rotometrics, Meadows of Dan,
VA
TA–W–73,653: Heartland Companies,
LTD., San Francisco, CA
TA–W–73,678: NPA Coatings, Inc.,
Leased from New United Motor
Manufacturing, Inc., Fremont, CA
TA–W–73,699: ABM Janitorial,
Sacramento, CA
TA–W–73,720: Apria Healthcare, Irving,
TX
TA–W–73,852: General Motors
Corporation, Vehicle Manufacturing
Division, Shreveport Assembly
Plant, Shreveport, LA
TA–W–73,858: Hugo Boss Cleveland,
Inc., Brooklyn, OH
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
TA–W–73,328: Sandy Corporation,
General Physics Corporation, Troy,
MI
TA–W–73,369: Key Energy Pressure
Pumping Services, LLC, Midland,
TX
TA–W–73,407: Express Energy Services
Operating, L.P., San Angelo, Texas
Division, San Angelo, TX
TA–W–73,454: Ickes Chevrolet Cadillac
Company, Inc., Robinson, IL
TA–W–73,521A: Citizens Gas Utility
District, Wartburg, TN
TA–W–73,521B: Citizens Gas Utility
District, Deerlodge, TN
TA–W–73,521: Citizens Gas Utility
District, Helenwood, TN
TA–W–73,536: Allstate Insurance
Company, Altoona Express Market
Claim Office, Kelly, Altoona, PA
TA–W–73,597: Tandy Brands
Accessories, Inc., Yoakum
Distribution Center, Yoakum, TX
TA–W–73,784A: Ferrania USA, Inc.,
D/B/A Ferrania Technologies, St.
Paul, MN
TA–W–73,784: Ferrania USA, Inc.,
D/B/A Ferrania Technologies,
Weatherford, OK
TA–W–73,785: Ferrania USA, Inc.,
D/B/A Ferrania Technologies,
Murrow, OH
TA–W–73,786: Ferrania USA, Inc.,
D/B/A Ferrania Technologies, Lake
Worth, FL
TA–W–73,787: Ferrania USA, Inc.,
D/B/A Ferrania Technologies,
Eagan, MN
I hereby certify that the aforementioned
determinations were issued during the period
of April 26, 2010 through May 7, 2010.
Copies of these determinations may be
requested under the Freedom of Information
Act. Requests may be submitted by fax,
courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure
Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. These
determinations also are available on the
Department’s Web site at https://
www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the
searchable listing of determinations.
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
TA–W–70,982: Rexam Beverage Can
Company, Oklahoma City, OK
TA–W–71,468: Electronic Data Systems,
Auburn Hills, MI
TA–W–71,718: DSFI, Honesdale, PA
TA–W–71,984: Seagroatt Floral
Company, Inc., Albany, NY
TA–W–72,255: Optimal, Inc. and
Populus Group, Working on-site at
General Motors Tech Center in
Warren, MI, Warren, MI
TA–W–72,387: Sony Electronics, Inc.,
Dothan, AL
TA–W–72,986: Wardwell Braiding
Machine Company, Central Falls, RI
TA–W–73,038: Vaquero Services, LP,
Godley, TX
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–12890 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30073
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–72,247]
National Briquetting Corporation, a
Subsidiary of Harsco, Also Known as
Performix East Chicago, East Chicago,
IN; Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated May 11, 2010, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The denial notice was signed on April
16, 2010, and will soon be published in
the Federal Register.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at National Briquetting Corporation, a
subsidiary of Harsco, also known as
Performix East Chicago, East Chicago,
Indiana, was based on the finding that
there has been no increase in imports by
the subject firm or its customers, or a
shift/acquisition to a foreign country by
the subject firm; and that the subject
firm did not produce an article or
supply a service that was used by a firm
with a TAA-certified worker group in
production of an article that was the
basis for TAA certification.
In the request for reconsideration the
petitioner stated that the workers of the
subject firm should be eligible for TAA
because of an increase in slag
conditioner (another product of the
subject firm) being exported to a foreign
firm that is one of the subject firm’s
primary customers, and that has itself
begun to do the processing that had
previously been done by the subject
firm.
However, the conducting by a foreign
customer in a foreign country of a
production process formerly carried out
in the United States by the subject firm
cannot be the basis for certification of
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
30074
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
the subject firm since: (1) The subject
firm has not imported the products like
and directly competitive with those it
formerly produced—the products are
being manufactured in an offshore
location and, rather than being imported
into this country, are being consumed
outside of the United States; and (2) the
customer itself and not the subject firm
has shifted production to an offshore
location.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC this 14th day of
May 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–12897 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4519–FN–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (10–061)]
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Heliophysics
Subcommittee; Meeting
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)
announces a meeting of the
Heliophysics Subcommittee of the
NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This
Subcommittee reports to the Science
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting
will be held for the purpose of soliciting
from the scientific community and other
persons scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
DATES: Wednesday, June 30, 2010,
9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; and Thursday,
July 1, 2010, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. EDT.
NASA Headquarters, 300 E
Street, SW., Room 3H46, Washington,
DC 20546.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marian Norris, Science Mission
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452,
fax (202) 358–4118, or
mnorris@nasa.gov.
The
meeting will be open to the public up to
the capacity of the room. The agenda for
the meeting includes the following
topics:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
—Heliophysics Division Overview and
Program Status
—Senior Review of Operating Missions
—Research and Analysis Program
—Assessment of Heliophysics Division
Science Accomplishments
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on these dates to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Attendees will be
requested to sign a register and to
comply with NASA security
requirements, including the
presentation of a valid picture ID, before
receiving an access badge. Foreign
nationals attending this meeting will be
required to provide a copy of their
passport, visa, or green card in addition
to providing the following information
no less than 10 working days prior to
the meeting: full name; gender; date/
place of birth; citizenship; visa/green
card information (number, type,
expiration date); passport information
(number, country, expiration date);
employer/affiliation information (name
of institution, address, country,
telephone); title/position of attendee. To
expedite admittance, attendees with
U.S. citizenship can provide identifying
information 3 working days in advance
by contacting Marian Norris via e-mail
at mnorris@nasa.gov or by telephone at
(202) 358–4452.
Dated: May 24, 2010.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–12813 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 72–9; NRC–2010–0188]
Notice of Docketing, Proposed Action,
and Opportunity for a Hearing for
Renewal of Special Nuclear Material
License No. SMN–2504
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
DATES: A request for hearing and/or
petition for leave to intervene must be
filed no later than 60 days from May 28,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher M. Staab, Project Manager,
Licensing Branch, Division of Spent
Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001. Telephone: (301) 492–3321; fax
number: (301) 492–3348; e-mail:
christopher.staab@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) is
considering an application dated
November 10, 2009, from the
Department of Energy (applicant or
DOE) for the renewal of its Special
Nuclear Material License No. SNM–
2504, under the provisions of 10 CFR
Part 72, for the receipt, possession,
storage and transfer of spent fuel,
reactor-related Greater than Class C
(GTCC) waste and other radioactive
materials associated with spent fuel
storage at the Fort St. Vrain Independent
Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI),
located at the Fort St. Vrain site in
Platteville, Colorado. If granted, the
renewed license will authorize the
applicant to continue to store spent fuel
in a dry cask storage system at the
applicant’s Fort St. Vrain ISFSI.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR
72.42, the renewal term of the license
for the ISFSI would be twenty (20)
years. This application was docketed
under 10 CFR Part 72; the ISFSI Docket
No. is 72–9.
An NRC acknowledgment review,
documented in an electronic mail to
DOE dated December 22, 2009, found
that the application contains sufficient
information for the NRC staff to begin its
technical review. The Commission will
approve the license renewal application
if it determines that the application
meets the standards and requirements of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act) and the
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30073-30074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-72,247]
National Briquetting Corporation, a Subsidiary of Harsco, Also
Known as Performix East Chicago, East Chicago, IN; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated May 11, 2010, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on April 16, 2010, and will
soon be published in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination of the TAA petition filed on behalf of
workers at National Briquetting Corporation, a subsidiary of Harsco,
also known as Performix East Chicago, East Chicago, Indiana, was based
on the finding that there has been no increase in imports by the
subject firm or its customers, or a shift/acquisition to a foreign
country by the subject firm; and that the subject firm did not produce
an article or supply a service that was used by a firm with a TAA-
certified worker group in production of an article that was the basis
for TAA certification.
In the request for reconsideration the petitioner stated that the
workers of the subject firm should be eligible for TAA because of an
increase in slag conditioner (another product of the subject firm)
being exported to a foreign firm that is one of the subject firm's
primary customers, and that has itself begun to do the processing that
had previously been done by the subject firm.
However, the conducting by a foreign customer in a foreign country
of a production process formerly carried out in the United States by
the subject firm cannot be the basis for certification of
[[Page 30074]]
the subject firm since: (1) The subject firm has not imported the
products like and directly competitive with those it formerly
produced--the products are being manufactured in an offshore location
and, rather than being imported into this country, are being consumed
outside of the United States; and (2) the customer itself and not the
subject firm has shifted production to an offshore location.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC this 14th day of May 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12897 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4519-FN-P