Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Study, 30047-30050 [2010-12795]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(referred to as the ‘‘CHIP Working
Group’’). The CHIP Working Group will
meet to address objectives specified
under section 311(b)(1)(C) of the
Children’s Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2009. This
meeting is open to the public.
DATES: Meeting Date: Monday, June 14,
2010 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time (e.s.t.).
Deadline for Registration without Oral
Presentation: June 12, 2010, 12 p.m.,
e.s.t.
Deadline for Registration of Oral
Presentations: June 10, 2010, 12 p.m.,
e.s.t.
Deadline for Submission of Oral
Remarks and Written Comments: June
10, 2010, 12 p.m., e.s.t.
Deadline for Requesting Special
Accommodations: June 10, 2010, 12
p.m., e.s.t.
ADDRESSES: Meeting Location: The
meeting will be held at the Grand Hyatt
Washington, 1000 H Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20001.
Submission of Testimony:
Testimonies should be mailed to Stacey
Green, Designated Federal Official
(DFO), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Mail
stop C2–04–04, Baltimore, MD 21244–
1850, or contact the DFO via e-mail at
stacey.green@cms.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacey Green, DFO, Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, Health
and Human Services at (410) 786–6102,
or Amy Turner, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, DOL at (202)
693–8335. News media representatives
must contact the CMS Press Office,
(202) 690–6145. Please refer to the
Internet at https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
FACA, or https://www.dol.gov/ebsa/
CHIP.html for additional information
and updates on committee activities.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 10(a) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), this notice announces the
second meeting of the Medicaid, CHIP,
and Employer-Sponsored Coverage
Coordination Working Group (‘‘CHIP
Working Group’’). The Secretary of
Health and Human Services and the
Secretary of Labor are required under
section 311(b)(1)(C) of the Children’s
Health Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) of 2009
(Pub. L. 111–3), enacted February 4,
2009, to jointly establish a CHIP
Working Group. The membership of the
group is based on nominations
submitted in response to a Federal
Register solicitation notice published on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
May 1, 2009 (74 FR 20323). The CHIP
Working Group will meet two times to
develop a model coverage coordination
disclosure form for group health plan
administrators to send to States upon
request regarding benefits available
under the plan. This notice will enable
States to determine the availability and
cost-effectiveness of providing premium
assistance to individuals eligible for
benefits under titles XIX or XXI of the
Social Security Act (the Act) to enable
them to enroll in group health plans.
The CHIP Working Group will identify
and report on the impediments to the
effective coordination of coverage
available to families that include
employees of employers that maintain
group health plans and members who
are eligible for medical assistance under
title XIX of the Act or child health
assistance or other health benefits
coverage under title XXI of the Act.
Not later than August 5, 2010, the
CHIP Working Group must submit to the
Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of
Health and Human Services the model
coverage coordination disclosure form
and the report containing
recommendations for appropriate
measures for addressing the
impediments to the effective
coordination of coverage.
II. Meeting Format and Agenda
The meeting will commence with
welcoming remarks from the CHIP
Working Group by Departmental
representatives. In addition, the agenda
will focus on the following:
• Introductions from Chair and CoChair.
• Review of the draft model coverage
coordination disclosure form for plan
administrators of group health plans.
The draft form is available for members
of the public to review at https://
www.dol.gov/ebsa/CHIP.html. To
submit written comments, follow the
instructions listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice.
• Review of report containing
recommendations for appropriate
measures for addressing the
impediments to the effective
coordination of coverage between group
health plans and title XIX and XXI State
plans.
• An opportunity for public comment
and testimony.
For additional information and
clarification on these topics, contact the
DFO as provided in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice. Individual or organizational
stakeholders that represent the focus
area of the CHIP Working Group
wishing to present a 5-minute oral
testimony on agenda issues must
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30047
register with the DFO by the date listed
in the DATES section of this notice.
Testimony is limited to agenda topics
only. The number of oral testimonies
may be limited by the time available. A
written copy of the presenter’s oral
remarks must be submitted to the DFO
for distribution to CHIP Working Group
members for review before the meeting
by the date listed in the ‘‘DATES’’
section of this notice.
III. Meeting Registration and Security
Information
The meeting is open to the public, but
attendance is limited to the space
available. Persons wishing to attend this
meeting must register by contacting the
DFO at the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice or by
telephone at the number listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice by the date
specified in the DATES section of this
notice.
Individuals requiring sign language
interpretation or other special
accommodations must contact the DFO
via the contact information specified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice by the date listed
in the DATES section of this notice.
Authority: (Section 1868 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ee) and section
10(a) of Pub. L. 92–463 (5 U.S.C. App. 2,
section 10(a)).)
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Acting Administrator and Chief Operating
Officer, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Michael L. Davis
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employee
Benefits Security Administration, Department
of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2010–12952 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P–4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers
Study
Office of Head Start.
Notice of Public Comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The following Notice of
Public Comment is in response to
Section 649(f) Sub-Section (3) of the
2007 Head Start School Readiness Act
(the Act) requiring the Secretary to
publish in the Federal Register a plan
of how the Secretary will carry out
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
30048
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
section 649 Sub-Section (f) SubParagraph (1) and shall provide a period
for public comment.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before 60 days after this notice is
published.
To Comment on This Document, or
for Further Information Contact:
MigrantFederalRegister@
HeadStartinfo.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the Improving Head Start for School
Readiness Act of 2007, Public Law 110–
134, Section 649 [42 U.S.C. 9801]—SubSection 649(h)(1)(A–B), notice is hereby
given of a plan to conduct a set of
activities designed to focus on the
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Head
Start-eligible population. As required by
the Act, the Secretary shall work in
collaboration with providers of Migrant
and Seasonal Head Start programs, the
Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary
of Labor, the Bureau of Migrant Health,
and the Secretary of Education to
undertake the activities addressed in
this notice. The notice is required to
present: (1) A plan to ‘‘collect, report,
and share data, within a coordinated
system, on children of migrant and
seasonal farmworkers and their families,
including health records and
educational documents of such
children, in order to adequately account
for the number of children of migrant
and seasonal farmworkers who are
eligible for Head Start services and
determine how many of such children
receive the services;’’ (2) a plan to
‘‘identify barriers that prevent children
of migrant and seasonal farmworkers
who are eligible for Head Start services
from accessing Head Start services;’’ and
(3) ‘‘develop a plan for eliminating such
barriers, including certain requirements
relating to tracking, health records, and
educational documents, and increasing
enrollment.’’
Migrant and Seasonal Head Start
(MSHS) Plans
(1) Collaboration across Federal
agencies in order to adequately account
for the number of children of migrant
and seasonal farmworkers who are
eligible for Head Start services and
determine how many of such children
receive the services.
Interagency Meetings. On December 5,
2008, ACF convened a meeting of
representatives from the United States
(U.S.) Department of Education (ED),
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education, Office of Migrant Education;
the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment and Training
Administration; and the U.S.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA), Office
of Migrant Health; the HHS
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Head Start (OHS),
Migrant and Seasonal Head Start, and
the Office of Planning, Research and
Evaluation. The purpose of the meeting
was to engage these agencies in
discussing their efforts in collecting,
reporting, and sharing data and lessons
learned to enhance coordination among
agencies at the Federal, State, and local
levels. This meeting resulted in the
organization of a series of Interagency
Roundtables on Migrant and Seasonal
Farmworkers.
The Roundtables will look at:
• Data collection efforts affecting
migrant and seasonal farmworker
children and their families, including
efforts to maintain and coordinate their
health and education records: How are
data efforts pursued and maintained?
How are data collected and reported?
What are the lessons learned from
previous attempts at coordinating data
collection efforts?
• Accounting for the number of
eligible children/workers, as well as the
number of children/workers who
receive services: How do various
organizations identify gaps in their
services? How can these approaches be
improved? and
• Identifying barriers that prevent
eligible migrant and seasonal
farmworkers and their families from
accessing migrant and seasonal services:
How can these barriers be reduced,
ameliorated or eliminated?
After a first planning meeting with
agencies involved, the first Roundtable
was held in April 2009 and focused on
the Department of Education’s Migrant
Student Information Exchange (MSIX)
and the Department of Labor’s National
Agricultural Worker’s Survey (NAWS).
The second half of the day involved
active discussions between the Federal
representatives, addressing the topical
questions in light of the presented
information. An additional meeting was
held on March 17, 2010.
Systematic Data Collection: Accounting
for the Number of Children Eligible
Farmworkers are eligible for MSHS
services based on mobility,
employment, age of the children, and
income. For the eligibility of migrants,
the family must be primarily engaged in
agricultural work and have changed
geographical locations within the past
24 months in pursuit of agricultural
work. For seasonal farmworkers eligible
for MSHS, the parents must be primarily
engaged in farmwork but need not have
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
changed geographical locations within
the past 24 months. For both migrant
and seasonal farmworkers, acceptable
farmwork includes production and
harvesting of tree and field crops.
Production and harvesting of tree and
field crops include preparing the soil,
planting, cultivating, picking, packing,
canning, and processing. Agricultural
work that supports the crop production
such as irrigation, crop protection, and
operation of farm machinery are also
included. Production and harvesting of
greenhouse and nursery products may
also be included. Eligible children range
in age from newborn up to compulsory
school age. Income requirements for
families are based on poverty guidelines
updated annually in the Federal
Register by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. The
income of migrant and seasonal eligible
families must be primarily derived from
agricultural work.
As OHS has been asked to account for
the total number of MSHS-eligible
children, it reviewed the data collection
resources of other Federal agencies that
are also currently serving or observing
migrant and seasonal farmworkers.
These included the Enumeration
Studies of Migrant Health; Reports of
Migrant Health Clinics; Data
Transferring Efforts of Migrant
Education; and the National
Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) of
the Department of Labor.
The methodology of the Enumeration
Profiles (Larson Assistance Services,
Vashon Island; 1990; 2001; 2002) was
very individualized per State and
involved intensive effort. The results
presented estimates of the number of
farmworkers within a State and, when
possible, by county and across age
groups. The resulting profile estimations
were based on secondary data analyses
and the opinions of invested experts;
the validity and reliability of the
information was therefore undermined
by the inherent variations in quality and
quantity of data from State to State.
There are 154 Federally funded
migrant health center (MHC) entities,
sponsored by the Office of Migrant
Health, that collectively operate more
than 500 satellite service sites that
comprise a loosely knit network of
independent organizations serving
migrant and seasonal farmworkers.
Their annual reports present the
national and State number of
farmworkers served by the clinic sites:
https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/2007data/
National/migrant/
NationalTable3Amhc.htm. However,
methodological and definitional issues
currently undermine the possibility of
using Migrant Health Clinic data to
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
account for numbers of MSHS-eligible
nationally. The HRSA definition of
farmworkers eligible for service is
similar to the MSHS definition in terms
of the types of farmwork allowable and
the mobility requirements. However,
HRSA does not require the whole family
to engage in agricultural work or to
change geographical location in order to
receive services. Methodologically,
programs do not consistently share data
across sites, so the cumulative count of
individuals served may include workers
who are counted more than one time as
they migrate for work. Further,
information about the entire family is
not reported for each individual, so
siblings that might be eligible for MSHS
are not identified. Finally, migrant
clinics are scattered across the U.S., but
their distribution does not necessarily
reflect a geographically representative
profile of farmworkers in the U.S.
Migrant Education of ED uses an
extensive network of recruiters to
actively identify eligible students in
each area. The Migrant Education
program uses a data transferring system
to coordinate records across schools for
children of migrant farmworkers. Again,
definitional and methodological issues
reduce the usefulness of these data for
identifying the number of MSHSeligible nationally. Migrant Education
services are available for children who
traveled with their families within the
past three years for purposes of a family
member’s temporary or seasonal
employment with agricultural, fishing,
farming or logging. Further, Migrant
Education recruiters are primarily
interested in identifying eligible threeyear-olds through high school aged.
Given these definitions, the number of
children eligible for Migrant Education
will differ markedly from those eligible
for MSHS.
OHS also reviewed an additional
established methodology for accounting
for the national population of migrant
and seasonal farmworkers: The National
Agricultural Worker’s Survey (NAWS).
NAWS is a national, random sample
survey of crop farmworkers in the
continental U.S. that is housed at the
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The
data is collected directly from
agricultural workers, on an annual basis,
using field survey methods. Estimates
and data from this effort have been used
by HRSA, Migrant Education, and DOLFarmworkers Job Programs.
Topics covered by NAWS have
included farmworker work histories and
tasks, as well as health and housing.
The survey methodology is complex,
with sampling occurring three times per
year to capture seasonal and geographic
variations in the farmworker
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
population. NAWS interviewers travel
to randomly selected counties,
contacting an annual sample of
approximately 500 agricultural
employers to obtain cooperation for the
survey. At the randomly selected
agricultural establishments,
interviewers draw a random sample of
farmworkers and then administer the
questionnaire. DOL calculates estimates
of each State’s share of the Migrant
Seasonal Farmworkers population based
on a formula that includes several data
sources, including the Census of
Agriculture, U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) Quarterly
Agricultural Labor Survey and NAWS.
Strengths and weaknesses of each of
these datasets are outlined in Steirman,
Kissam, and Nakamoto, 1998.
Estimating the national number of
eligible MSHS children using NAWS
data is a multi-step process. The first
step is to calculate a size estimate for
the national farmworker population
(typically done using either the USDA
Farm Labor Survey or the USDA Census
of Agriculture). The second step is to
identify the percent of the farmworker
population eligible for MSHS and the
average number of infant through preschool aged children per family (using
three-year averages of NAWS data
regarding percentages of farmworker
families meeting eligibility
requirements). From steps one and two,
it is possible to estimate the national
average of eligible migrant and seasonal
children. To further refine these
numbers to agricultural regions, it is
necessary to incorporate data regarding
the proportion of farmworkers within
each region (USDA Farm Labor Survey),
and multiply the national average of
eligible by these proportions.
Upon review of these methods, the
NAWS methodology was identified as
an established, carefully designed, large
scale approach to estimating numbers of
agricultural workers nationally and by
agricultural regions. Beginning in
February 2008, ACF partnered with
DOL to use this established survey to
gather a national estimate of MSHSeligible children (both migrant and
seasonal). Estimates for seven multistate agricultural regions will also be
calculated. In June 2009, the results
from the pilot year of NAWS will be
made available to OHS for review and
discussion. Further minor refinement of
the NAWS–MSHS questions will be
ongoing, to ensure that children who
match to the MSHS definition of eligible
can be accurately identified.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30049
Additional Systematic Data Collection:
Design for MSHS Survey
A team of researchers, led by CDM,
Inc., contracted in September 2007, to
design the methodology for an MSHS
Survey. The plans will detail multiple
options for gathering descriptive data at
varied levels of the MSHS organization
(i.e., program, center, staff, children
and/or families). The development
activities included gathering of insight
and suggestions from program staff,
administrators and families who are
currently or previously served by
MSHS. Topics that could be addressed
by the survey and the methods outlined
for gathering the data have been
substantially shaped and refined by this
input from program stakeholders. After
completion of the contract and review
by ACF leadership, the report for the
Design for MSHS Survey project will be
placed online in late 2010.
(1) A Plan To Identify Obstacles and
Barriers
Focus Groups. As a first step in
developing a plan to identify barriers,
ACF consulted with MSHS advocates,
grantees, families and researchers
attending the thirty-eighth and thirtyninth Annual Migrant and Seasonal
Head Start Conferences in Washington,
D.C. Potential themes regarding
obstacles and barriers will be explored
by providing venues that will allow
opportunities for comment by key
stakeholders. These discussions will be
used to seek examples of high-quality
recruitment and outreach efforts, details
of families’ and programs’ perceptions
of barriers, and potential solutions for
reducing or eliminating barriers. The
information gained through these
venues is being analyzed and will be
made available to Federal partners,
Migrant and Seasonal Head Start
grantees, and advocacy groups for
comment and validation.
Efforts for additional discussions with
stakeholders are continually explored.
Systematic Data Collection:
Identification of Obstacles and Barriers
As discussed extensively above, the
NAWS is a national, random sample
survey of crop farmworkers in the
continental U.S. that is housed at DOL.
Beginning in February 2008, ACF
partnered with DOL to pilot a
questionnaire supplement to NAWS,
aimed at families with children under
the age of six. The questionnaire
supplement asks about:
• Child care options used by the
parents in recent months,
• Reasons for those choices,
• Parents’ knowledge of MSHS,
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
30050
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
• Families’ participation in MSHS,
and
• Any perceived obstacles to
participation.
The resulting information can be
collected for multiple cycles of NAWS
data, identifying potential issues in
various agricultural regions over the
course of the seasons. If continued for
multiple years, it should be possible to
identify trends in farmworker family
child care use for their young children
and family perceptions of MSHS.
Systematic Data Collection:
Incorporation of Related Questions in
Design of MSHS Survey
The design options for the MSHS
Survey will include components that
OHS could use to gather information
regarding obstacles and barriers.
Possible routes identified thus far
include record reviews that could
provide insight (e.g., review of local
community needs assessments and
program recruitment methods);
gathering staff and parent opinions
regarding obstacles and barriers to
MSHS participation; or direct
interviews with community partners
and local advocacy organizations. The
design contract will illuminate
methodological and logistical
considerations for collecting these types
of data, and will be useful as OHS
considers future data collection
strategies.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
(1) A Plan for Eliminating Identified
Barriers and for Increasing Enrollment
of Eligible Children
Based on the information obtained
from the Migrant and Seasonal
Roundtables, and input from MSHS
grantees, families, researchers, and
private organizations involved in
advocating for Migrant and Seasonal
families, ACF will develop a plan that
will articulate barriers identified
through (1) and (2) above, propose
methods for dealing with them that are
within ACF’s legislative purview, and
incorporate methods that require action
by other Federal agencies or statutory
changes. The plan for eliminating
identified barriers will form the basis for
a strategy to increase the enrollment of
eligible children in MSHS, as
appropriate.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Yvette Sanchez Fuentes,
Director, Office of Head Start.
[FR Doc. 2010–12795 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–40–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Form N–648, Revision of an
Existing Information Collection
Request; Comment Request
ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information
Collection Under Review: Form N–648,
Medical Certification for Disability
Exceptions. OMB Control No. 1615–
0060.
The Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) has
submitted the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register on February 1, 2010, at 75 FR
5099, allowing for a 60-day public
comment period. USCIS received
comments from three commenters. The
comments and USCIS’ response can be
found in the supporting statement on
www.regulations.gov.
The purpose of this notice is to allow
an additional 30 days for public
comments. Comments are encouraged
and will be accepted until June 28,
2010. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the item(s) contained in this
notice, especially regarding the
estimated public burden and associated
response time, should be directed to the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS), and to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) USCIS Desk Officer.
Comments may be submitted to: USCIS,
Chief, Regulatory Products Division,
Clearance Office, 111 Massachusetts
Avenue, Washington, DC 20529–2210.
Comments may also be submitted to
DHS via facsimile to 202–272–8352 or
via e-mail at rfs.regs@dhs.gov, and OMB
USCIS Desk Officer via facsimile at 202–
395–5806 or via e-mail at
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
When submitting comments by e-mail
please make sure to add OMB Control
Number 1615–0060 in the subject box.
Written comments and suggestions from
the public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques, or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of an existing information
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Medical Certification for Disability
Exceptions.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: Form N–648.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS).
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. USCIS uses Form N–648
issued by the medical professional to
substantiate a claim for an exception to
the requirements of section 312(a) of the
Act.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 20,000 responses at 2 hours
per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 40,000 annual burden hours.
If you need a copy of the information
collection instrument, please visit the
Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov.
We may also be contacted at: USCIS,
Regulatory Products Division, 111
Massachusetts Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2210,
Telephone number 202–272–8377.
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Stephen Tarragon,
Deputy Chief, Regulatory Products Division,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–12816 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30047-30050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12795]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Study
AGENCY: Office of Head Start.
ACTION: Notice of Public Comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The following Notice of Public Comment is in response to
Section 649(f) Sub-Section (3) of the 2007 Head Start School Readiness
Act (the Act) requiring the Secretary to publish in the Federal
Register a plan of how the Secretary will carry out
[[Page 30048]]
section 649 Sub-Section (f) Sub-Paragraph (1) and shall provide a
period for public comment.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before 60 days after this notice is published.
To Comment on This Document, or for Further Information Contact:
MigrantFederalRegister@HeadStartinfo.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Improving Head Start for
School Readiness Act of 2007, Public Law 110-134, Section 649 [42
U.S.C. 9801]--Sub-Section 649(h)(1)(A-B), notice is hereby given of a
plan to conduct a set of activities designed to focus on the Migrant
and Seasonal Farmworker Head Start-eligible population. As required by
the Act, the Secretary shall work in collaboration with providers of
Migrant and Seasonal Head Start programs, the Secretary of Agriculture,
the Secretary of Labor, the Bureau of Migrant Health, and the Secretary
of Education to undertake the activities addressed in this notice. The
notice is required to present: (1) A plan to ``collect, report, and
share data, within a coordinated system, on children of migrant and
seasonal farmworkers and their families, including health records and
educational documents of such children, in order to adequately account
for the number of children of migrant and seasonal farmworkers who are
eligible for Head Start services and determine how many of such
children receive the services;'' (2) a plan to ``identify barriers that
prevent children of migrant and seasonal farmworkers who are eligible
for Head Start services from accessing Head Start services;'' and (3)
``develop a plan for eliminating such barriers, including certain
requirements relating to tracking, health records, and educational
documents, and increasing enrollment.''
Migrant and Seasonal Head Start (MSHS) Plans
(1) Collaboration across Federal agencies in order to adequately
account for the number of children of migrant and seasonal farmworkers
who are eligible for Head Start services and determine how many of such
children receive the services.
Interagency Meetings. On December 5, 2008, ACF convened a meeting
of representatives from the United States (U.S.) Department of
Education (ED), Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of
Migrant Education; the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and
Training Administration; and the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA),
Office of Migrant Health; the HHS Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Head Start (OHS), Migrant and Seasonal Head Start,
and the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. The purpose of the
meeting was to engage these agencies in discussing their efforts in
collecting, reporting, and sharing data and lessons learned to enhance
coordination among agencies at the Federal, State, and local levels.
This meeting resulted in the organization of a series of Interagency
Roundtables on Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers.
The Roundtables will look at:
Data collection efforts affecting migrant and seasonal
farmworker children and their families, including efforts to maintain
and coordinate their health and education records: How are data efforts
pursued and maintained? How are data collected and reported? What are
the lessons learned from previous attempts at coordinating data
collection efforts?
Accounting for the number of eligible children/workers, as
well as the number of children/workers who receive services: How do
various organizations identify gaps in their services? How can these
approaches be improved? and
Identifying barriers that prevent eligible migrant and
seasonal farmworkers and their families from accessing migrant and
seasonal services: How can these barriers be reduced, ameliorated or
eliminated?
After a first planning meeting with agencies involved, the first
Roundtable was held in April 2009 and focused on the Department of
Education's Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) and the
Department of Labor's National Agricultural Worker's Survey (NAWS). The
second half of the day involved active discussions between the Federal
representatives, addressing the topical questions in light of the
presented information. An additional meeting was held on March 17,
2010.
Systematic Data Collection: Accounting for the Number of Children
Eligible
Farmworkers are eligible for MSHS services based on mobility,
employment, age of the children, and income. For the eligibility of
migrants, the family must be primarily engaged in agricultural work and
have changed geographical locations within the past 24 months in
pursuit of agricultural work. For seasonal farmworkers eligible for
MSHS, the parents must be primarily engaged in farmwork but need not
have changed geographical locations within the past 24 months. For both
migrant and seasonal farmworkers, acceptable farmwork includes
production and harvesting of tree and field crops. Production and
harvesting of tree and field crops include preparing the soil,
planting, cultivating, picking, packing, canning, and processing.
Agricultural work that supports the crop production such as irrigation,
crop protection, and operation of farm machinery are also included.
Production and harvesting of greenhouse and nursery products may also
be included. Eligible children range in age from newborn up to
compulsory school age. Income requirements for families are based on
poverty guidelines updated annually in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. The income of migrant and
seasonal eligible families must be primarily derived from agricultural
work.
As OHS has been asked to account for the total number of MSHS-
eligible children, it reviewed the data collection resources of other
Federal agencies that are also currently serving or observing migrant
and seasonal farmworkers. These included the Enumeration Studies of
Migrant Health; Reports of Migrant Health Clinics; Data Transferring
Efforts of Migrant Education; and the National Agricultural Workers
Survey (NAWS) of the Department of Labor.
The methodology of the Enumeration Profiles (Larson Assistance
Services, Vashon Island; 1990; 2001; 2002) was very individualized per
State and involved intensive effort. The results presented estimates of
the number of farmworkers within a State and, when possible, by county
and across age groups. The resulting profile estimations were based on
secondary data analyses and the opinions of invested experts; the
validity and reliability of the information was therefore undermined by
the inherent variations in quality and quantity of data from State to
State.
There are 154 Federally funded migrant health center (MHC)
entities, sponsored by the Office of Migrant Health, that collectively
operate more than 500 satellite service sites that comprise a loosely
knit network of independent organizations serving migrant and seasonal
farmworkers. Their annual reports present the national and State number
of farmworkers served by the clinic sites: https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/2007data/National/migrant/NationalTable3Amhc.htm. However,
methodological and definitional issues currently undermine the
possibility of using Migrant Health Clinic data to
[[Page 30049]]
account for numbers of MSHS-eligible nationally. The HRSA definition of
farmworkers eligible for service is similar to the MSHS definition in
terms of the types of farmwork allowable and the mobility requirements.
However, HRSA does not require the whole family to engage in
agricultural work or to change geographical location in order to
receive services. Methodologically, programs do not consistently share
data across sites, so the cumulative count of individuals served may
include workers who are counted more than one time as they migrate for
work. Further, information about the entire family is not reported for
each individual, so siblings that might be eligible for MSHS are not
identified. Finally, migrant clinics are scattered across the U.S., but
their distribution does not necessarily reflect a geographically
representative profile of farmworkers in the U.S.
Migrant Education of ED uses an extensive network of recruiters to
actively identify eligible students in each area. The Migrant Education
program uses a data transferring system to coordinate records across
schools for children of migrant farmworkers. Again, definitional and
methodological issues reduce the usefulness of these data for
identifying the number of MSHS-eligible nationally. Migrant Education
services are available for children who traveled with their families
within the past three years for purposes of a family member's temporary
or seasonal employment with agricultural, fishing, farming or logging.
Further, Migrant Education recruiters are primarily interested in
identifying eligible three-year-olds through high school aged. Given
these definitions, the number of children eligible for Migrant
Education will differ markedly from those eligible for MSHS.
OHS also reviewed an additional established methodology for
accounting for the national population of migrant and seasonal
farmworkers: The National Agricultural Worker's Survey (NAWS). NAWS is
a national, random sample survey of crop farmworkers in the continental
U.S. that is housed at the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The data is
collected directly from agricultural workers, on an annual basis, using
field survey methods. Estimates and data from this effort have been
used by HRSA, Migrant Education, and DOL-Farmworkers Job Programs.
Topics covered by NAWS have included farmworker work histories and
tasks, as well as health and housing. The survey methodology is
complex, with sampling occurring three times per year to capture
seasonal and geographic variations in the farmworker population. NAWS
interviewers travel to randomly selected counties, contacting an annual
sample of approximately 500 agricultural employers to obtain
cooperation for the survey. At the randomly selected agricultural
establishments, interviewers draw a random sample of farmworkers and
then administer the questionnaire. DOL calculates estimates of each
State's share of the Migrant Seasonal Farmworkers population based on a
formula that includes several data sources, including the Census of
Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Quarterly
Agricultural Labor Survey and NAWS. Strengths and weaknesses of each of
these datasets are outlined in Steirman, Kissam, and Nakamoto, 1998.
Estimating the national number of eligible MSHS children using NAWS
data is a multi-step process. The first step is to calculate a size
estimate for the national farmworker population (typically done using
either the USDA Farm Labor Survey or the USDA Census of Agriculture).
The second step is to identify the percent of the farmworker population
eligible for MSHS and the average number of infant through pre-school
aged children per family (using three-year averages of NAWS data
regarding percentages of farmworker families meeting eligibility
requirements). From steps one and two, it is possible to estimate the
national average of eligible migrant and seasonal children. To further
refine these numbers to agricultural regions, it is necessary to
incorporate data regarding the proportion of farmworkers within each
region (USDA Farm Labor Survey), and multiply the national average of
eligible by these proportions.
Upon review of these methods, the NAWS methodology was identified
as an established, carefully designed, large scale approach to
estimating numbers of agricultural workers nationally and by
agricultural regions. Beginning in February 2008, ACF partnered with
DOL to use this established survey to gather a national estimate of
MSHS-eligible children (both migrant and seasonal). Estimates for seven
multi-state agricultural regions will also be calculated. In June 2009,
the results from the pilot year of NAWS will be made available to OHS
for review and discussion. Further minor refinement of the NAWS-MSHS
questions will be ongoing, to ensure that children who match to the
MSHS definition of eligible can be accurately identified.
Additional Systematic Data Collection: Design for MSHS Survey
A team of researchers, led by CDM, Inc., contracted in September
2007, to design the methodology for an MSHS Survey. The plans will
detail multiple options for gathering descriptive data at varied levels
of the MSHS organization (i.e., program, center, staff, children and/or
families). The development activities included gathering of insight and
suggestions from program staff, administrators and families who are
currently or previously served by MSHS. Topics that could be addressed
by the survey and the methods outlined for gathering the data have been
substantially shaped and refined by this input from program
stakeholders. After completion of the contract and review by ACF
leadership, the report for the Design for MSHS Survey project will be
placed online in late 2010.
(1) A Plan To Identify Obstacles and Barriers
Focus Groups. As a first step in developing a plan to identify
barriers, ACF consulted with MSHS advocates, grantees, families and
researchers attending the thirty-eighth and thirty-ninth Annual Migrant
and Seasonal Head Start Conferences in Washington, D.C. Potential
themes regarding obstacles and barriers will be explored by providing
venues that will allow opportunities for comment by key stakeholders.
These discussions will be used to seek examples of high-quality
recruitment and outreach efforts, details of families' and programs'
perceptions of barriers, and potential solutions for reducing or
eliminating barriers. The information gained through these venues is
being analyzed and will be made available to Federal partners, Migrant
and Seasonal Head Start grantees, and advocacy groups for comment and
validation.
Efforts for additional discussions with stakeholders are
continually explored.
Systematic Data Collection: Identification of Obstacles and Barriers
As discussed extensively above, the NAWS is a national, random
sample survey of crop farmworkers in the continental U.S. that is
housed at DOL. Beginning in February 2008, ACF partnered with DOL to
pilot a questionnaire supplement to NAWS, aimed at families with
children under the age of six. The questionnaire supplement asks about:
Child care options used by the parents in recent months,
Reasons for those choices,
Parents' knowledge of MSHS,
[[Page 30050]]
Families' participation in MSHS, and
Any perceived obstacles to participation.
The resulting information can be collected for multiple cycles of
NAWS data, identifying potential issues in various agricultural regions
over the course of the seasons. If continued for multiple years, it
should be possible to identify trends in farmworker family child care
use for their young children and family perceptions of MSHS.
Systematic Data Collection: Incorporation of Related Questions in
Design of MSHS Survey
The design options for the MSHS Survey will include components that
OHS could use to gather information regarding obstacles and barriers.
Possible routes identified thus far include record reviews that could
provide insight (e.g., review of local community needs assessments and
program recruitment methods); gathering staff and parent opinions
regarding obstacles and barriers to MSHS participation; or direct
interviews with community partners and local advocacy organizations.
The design contract will illuminate methodological and logistical
considerations for collecting these types of data, and will be useful
as OHS considers future data collection strategies.
(1) A Plan for Eliminating Identified Barriers and for Increasing
Enrollment of Eligible Children
Based on the information obtained from the Migrant and Seasonal
Roundtables, and input from MSHS grantees, families, researchers, and
private organizations involved in advocating for Migrant and Seasonal
families, ACF will develop a plan that will articulate barriers
identified through (1) and (2) above, propose methods for dealing with
them that are within ACF's legislative purview, and incorporate methods
that require action by other Federal agencies or statutory changes. The
plan for eliminating identified barriers will form the basis for a
strategy to increase the enrollment of eligible children in MSHS, as
appropriate.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Yvette Sanchez Fuentes,
Director, Office of Head Start.
[FR Doc. 2010-12795 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-40-P