Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 29718-29719 [2010-12822]

Download as PDF 29718 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 102 / Thursday, May 27, 2010 / Notices DATES: The meeting will be held on June 22, 2010, beginning at 10 a.m. A second day of the meeting, on June 23, 2010, will begin at 8 a.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Drury Inn, 4310 The 25 Way, NE., in the Taos Room, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Written comments should be sent to Ignacio Peralta, Carson National Forest, 208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to iperalta@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to 575–758–6213. All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may inspect comments received at Carson National Forest, 208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 575–758–6344 to facilitate entry into the building. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RAC Coordinator USDA, Carson National Forest: Ignacio Peralta, 575–758–6344, 208 Cruz Alta Rd., Taos, NM 87571. E-mail: iperalta@fs.fed.us. RAC Coordinator, USDA, Santa Fe National Forest: Ruben Montes, 505–438–5356, 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87508. E-mail: rmontes@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) Introductions of all committee members, replacement members, and Forest Service personnel; (2) Selection of a chairperson by the committee members; (3) Review of Act and RAC Charter; (4) Administrative budget; (5) Receive materials explaining the process for considering and recommending Title II projects; and (6) Public Comment. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Dated: May 21, 2010. Kendall Clark, Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest. [FR Doc. 2010–12751 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am] wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Dated: May 21, 2010. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:26 May 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: Office of the Secretary, Office of Administrative Services. Title: DOC National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Questionnaire and Checklist. OMB Control Number: 0690–0028. Form Number(s): CD–593. Type of Request: Regular submission. Number of Respondents: 200. Average Hours per Response: 2 hours. Burden Hours: 400. Needs and Uses: The Environmental Questionnaire and Checklist is designed to be used by both grants applicants and Federal entities proposing construction or infrastructure projects. The questions address a diverse range of potential environmental issues covered under Federal environmental laws and regulations and are designed to provide a reviewer enough information to determine the level of NEPA documentation necessary to comply with the law. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; not-for-profit institutions; individuals and households. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain a benefit. OMB Desk Officer: Nicholas Fraser, (202) 395–5887. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to Nicholas Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395–5806, or via the Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov. [FR Doc. 2010–12695 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–NW–P PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–838, A–570–892] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP–23) from India and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation for the antidumping duty orders. DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482– 1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 2, 2009, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on CVP–23 from India and the PRC 1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 74 FR 56593 (November 2, 2009); See also Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From China and India, 74 FR 56663 (November 2, 2009). As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the orders be revoked. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India and the People’s 1 On December 29, 2004, the Department published the following antidumping duty orders: Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR 77987 (December 29, 2004); Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004). E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 102 / Thursday, May 27, 2010 / Notices Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 12497 (March 16, 2010). On May 10, 2010, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the ITC determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on CVP–23 from India and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 437 and 731–TA–1060 and 1061, USITC Publication 4151 (April 2010). See also Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India; Determinations, 75 FR 27815 (May 18, 2010). wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these antidumping duty orders is CVP–23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2b:3′,2′-m] 2 triphenodioxazine, 8,18dichloro-5, 15-diethyl-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2. The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigment dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the scope of the orders. The merchandise subject to the orders is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.90.40 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written descriptions of the scope of the orders are dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of these determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping duty orders on CVP–23 from India and the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these orders will be 2 The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not businessproprietary information. In this case, the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:26 May 26, 2010 Jkt 220001 the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with Section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to Section 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 21, 2010. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–12822 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–839] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Continuation of Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on CVP–23 would likely lead to continuation of countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of this CVD order. DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Douthit at (202) 482–5050, or Dana Mermelstein at (202) 482–1391, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The CVD order was published in the Federal Register on December 24, 2004. See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR 77995 (December 29, 2004). On November 2, 2009, the Department initiated and the ITC instituted a sunset review of the CVD order on CVP–23 from India pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29719 (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 74 FR 56593 (November 2, 2009). As a result of its review, the Department found that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the net countervailable subsidies likely to prevail were the order to be revoked. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Final Results of the Expedited Five-year (Sunset) Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 75 FR 13257 (March 19, 2010). On May 10, 2010, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the ITC determined that revocation of the CVD order on CVP–23 from India, would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonable foreseeable time. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India; Determinations, 75 FR 27815 (May 18, 2010). Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is CVP–23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,15diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2.1 The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the scope of the order. The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is dispositive. Continuation of the Order As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies, and material injury, to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the CVD order on CVP–23 from India. 1 The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business proprietary information; the brackets are part of the chemical nomenclature. See December 4, 2003 amendment to petition (supplemental petition) at 8. E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 102 (Thursday, May 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29718-29719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12822]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-838, A-570-892]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India and the People's Republic 
of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that 
revocation of the antidumping duty orders on carbazole violet pigment 
23 (CVP-23) from India and the People's Republic of China (PRC) would 
likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material 
injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is 
publishing a notice of continuation for the antidumping duty orders.

DATES: Effective Date: May 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3683 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 2, 2009, the Department initiated and the ITC 
instituted sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on CVP-23 from 
India and the PRC \1\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act). See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') 
Review, 74 FR 56593 (November 2, 2009); See also Carbazole Violet 
Pigment 23 From China and India, 74 FR 56663 (November 2, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On December 29, 2004, the Department published the following 
antidumping duty orders: Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet 
Pigment 23 From the People's Republic of China, 69 FR 77987 
(December 29, 2004); Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales 
at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet 
Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department determined that 
revocation of the antidumping duty orders would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC 
of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the orders be 
revoked. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India and the People's

[[Page 29719]]

Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 
Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 12497 (March 16, 2010).
    On May 10, 2010, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the ITC 
determined that revocation of the antidumping duty order on CVP-23 from 
India and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China and India: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060 and 1061, USITC 
Publication 4151 (April 2010). See also Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 
from China and India; Determinations, 75 FR 27815 (May 18, 2010).

Scope of the Orders

    The merchandise subject to these antidumping duty orders is CVP-23 
identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-
1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] \2\ 
triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethyl-5, 15-dihydro-, and 
molecular formula of 
C34H22Cl2N4O2. 
The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., 
dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of 
presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigment 
dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included 
within the scope of the orders. The merchandise subject to the orders 
is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.90.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is 
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written descriptions 
of the scope of the orders are dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business-proprietary information. In this case, 
the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Continuation of the Orders

    As a result of these determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an 
industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the 
Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the antidumping 
duty orders on CVP-23 from India and the PRC.
    U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect 
antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of 
entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of 
continuation of these orders will be the date of publication in the 
Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-
year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth 
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
    These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance 
with Section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to Section 
777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-12822 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.