Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Volkswagen, 29812-29814 [2010-12809]
Download as PDF
29812
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 102 / Thursday, May 27, 2010 / Notices
1 p.m. SPR—Joint AIS and MET
Subgroup Meetings
15 June—Tuesday
9 a.m. Joint AIS and MET Subgroup
Meetings
16 June—Wednesday
11 a.m. Joint AIS and MET Subgroup
Meetings
17 June—Thursday
9 a.m. Joint AIS and MET Subgroup
Meetings
18 June—Friday
9 a.m. Joint AIS and MET Subgroup
Meetings
10:30 a.m.
Plenary Session
• Other Business.
• Meeting Plans and Dates.
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairmen,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Persons
wishing to present statements or obtain
information should contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. Members of the public
may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 21,
2010.
Meredith Gibbs,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010–12720 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
Notice and Request for Comments;
Waybill Compliance Survey
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
60-day Notice of Intent to seek
extension of approval.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–
3519 (PRA), the Surface Transportation
Board (STB or Board) gives notice of its
intent to seek from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) an
extension of approval for the currently
approved Waybill Compliance Survey.
This information collection is described
in detail below. Comments are
requested concerning (1) the accuracy of
the Board’s burden estimates; (2) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; (3)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 May 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
when appropriate; and (4) whether this
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Board, including
whether the collection has practical
utility. Submitted comments will be
summarized and included in the
Board’s request for OMB approval.
Description of Collection
Title: Waybill Compliance Survey.
OMB Control Number: 2140–0010.
STB Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension without
change.
Respondents: Regulated railroads that
did not submit carload waybill sample
information to the STB in the previous
year.
Number of Respondents: 120.
Estimated Time per Response: .5
hours.
Frequency: Annually.
Total Burden Hours (annually
including all respondents): 60.
Total ‘‘Non-hour Burden’’ Cost: No
‘‘non-hour cost’’ burdens associated with
this collection have been identified.
Needs and Uses: The ICC Termination
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–88, 109
Stat. 803 (1995), which took effect on
January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate
Commerce Commission and transferred
to the STB the responsibility for the
economic regulation of common carrier
rail transportation, including the
collection and administration of the
Carload Waybill Sample. Under 49 CFR
1244, a railroad terminating 4, 500 or
more carloads, or terminating at least
5% of the total revenue carloads that
terminate in a particular state, in any of
the three preceding years is required to
file carload waybill sample information
(Waybill Sample) for all line-haul
revenue waybills terminating on its
lines. The information in the Waybill
Sample is used to monitor traffic flows
and rate trends in the industry. The
Board needs to collect information in
the Waybill Compliance Survey—
information on carloads of traffic
terminated each year by U.S. railroads—
in order to determine which railroads
are required to file the Waybill Sample.
In addition, information collected in the
Waybill Compliance Survey, on a
voluntary basis, about the total
operating revenue of each railroad helps
to determine whether respondents are
subject to other statutory or regulatory
requirements. Accurate determinations
regarding the size of a railroad helps the
Board minimize the reporting burden
for smaller railroads. The Board has
authority to collect this information
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under 49 U.S.C. 11144 and 11145 and
under 49 CFR 1244.2.
DATES: Comments on this information
collection should be submitted by July
26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to
Marilyn Levitt, Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001, or to
levittm@stb.dot.gov. When submitting
comments, please refer to ‘‘Waybill
Compliance Survey, OMB control
number 2140–0010.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO OBTAIN
A COPY OF THE STB FORM, CONTACT: Paul
Aguiar, (202) 245–0323 or at
paul.aguiar@stb.dot.gov. [Assistance for
the hearing impaired is available
through the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA, a Federal agency conducting or
sponsoring a collection of information
must display a currently valid OMB
control number. A collection of
information, which is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c),
includes agency requirements that
persons submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to the agency, third
parties, or the public. Under section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, Federal
agencies are required to provide, prior
to an agency’s submitting a collection to
OMB for approval, a 60-day notice and
comment period through publication in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information.
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–12766 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;
Volkswagen
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
SUMMARY: This document grants in full
the Volkswagen Group of America
(Volkswagen) petition for an exemption
of the new vehicle line [confidential
nameplate] in accordance with 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from the Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 102 / Thursday, May 27, 2010 / Notices
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the parts
marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
Volkswagen requested confidential
treatment for the information it
submitted in support of its petition until
the market introduction of its new MY
2010 vehicle line (expected to be not
later than December 2011). The agency
addressed Volkswagen’s request for
confidential treatment by letter dated
April 30, 2010.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., West Building, W43–439,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s
phone number is (202) 366–0846. Her
fax number is (202) 493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated March 8, 2010,
Volkswagen requested an exemption
from the parts-marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
part 541) for the new MY 2012 vehicle
line. The petition requested an
exemption from parts marking pursuant
to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard,
based on the installation of an antitheft
device as standard equipment for an
entire vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Volkswagen provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
its new vehicle line. Volkswagen will
install its fourth generation,
transponder-based electronic engine
immobilizer antitheft device as standard
equipment on its new vehicle line
beginning with MY 2012. Volkswagen
stated that the aim of its immobilizer
device is to actively incorporate the
engine control unit into the evaluation
and monitoring process. Key
components of the antitheft device will
include a passive immobilizer, a
warning message indicator, an adapted
ignition key, an ignition lock reading
coil, an engine control unit and an
immobilizer control unit. The antitheft
device will also include an audible and
visible alarm feature as optional
equipment. Volkswagen’s submission is
considered a complete petition as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 May 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements
contained in § 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of § 543.6.
Volkswagen stated that it will also
offer an optional advanced key
(‘‘keyless’’) device with its new vehicle
line. Volkswagen stated that with the
‘‘keyless’’ device, a transmitter in the key
fob communicates with the vehicle
ignition control system to perform
immobilizer and engine start and stop
functions without the need to insert a
physical key into the mechanical
ignition switch device. Volkswagen
further stated that the immobilizer
function is the same with both the
standard key and the keyless device.
Volkswagen stated that activation of
the standard key device occurs
automatically when the transponder key
is removed from the ignition switch or
when the key fob is taken outside the
vehicle in the optional advanced key
device. Deactivation of the standard key
device occurs when the key is inserted,
the ignition is turned on and the
transponder key is recognized by the
immobilizer control unit, enabling start
up of the vehicle. After recognition by
the electronic module of the key
transponder, the key is paired up with
the immobilizer control module and
cannot be used for any other
immobilizer. Deactivation of the
optional advanced key device occurs
when the key fob transponder is inside
the vehicle and is recognized by the
immobilizer control unit.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Volkswagen
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of
the device, Volkswagen stated that the
antitheft device will be tested for
compliance to its corporate
requirements for electrical and
electronic assemblies in motor vehicles
related to performance.
Volkswagen stated that it believes the
immobilizer device in the new vehicle
line will be effective in deterring theft
as it has been in other Volkswagen
vehicle lines for which theft data has
been published. Volkswagen provided
comparative data in support of its belief
that its device will be as effective in
deterring and reducing vehicle theft as
those vehicle lines for which the theft
data was published. Volkswagen stated
that its proposed device is similar to the
antitheft device installed on the MY
2011 Tiguan vehicle line which was
granted an exemption by the agency on
December 1, 2009. Volkswagen further
stated that its device is also installed on
its current Eos, Passat, Golf, Jetta and
Touareg vehicle lines. Volkswagen
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29813
provided data showing that from MY’s
2005–2007, theft rates published by the
agency for the Jetta, Passat, Eos, and
Golf/GTI vehicles installed with the
immobilizer device are all below the
median theft rate. Specifically, the Jetta,
Passat and Golf/GTI vehicle lines have
an average theft rate using three MYs’
data of 1.3058, 1.0853 and 1.4656
respectively. The Eos vehicle line using
one MY’s data has a theft rate of 0.8205.
In support of its belief that its
antitheft device will be as or more
effective in reducing and deterring
vehicle theft than the parts-marking
requirement, Volkswagen referenced the
effectiveness of immobilizer devices
installed on other vehicles for which
NHTSA has granted exemptions.
Specifically, Volkswagen referenced
information from the Highway Loss Data
Institute which showed that BMW
vehicles experienced theft loss
reductions resulting in a 73% decrease
in relative claim frequency and a 78%
lower average loss payment per claim
for vehicles equipped with an
immobilizer. Volkswagen also stated
that Chrysler reported that the average
theft rate for the Jeep Grand Cherokee
between MYs’ 1995 and 1998 (prior to
addition of an immobilizer) was
significantly reduced from 5.3574 to
2.5492 from MYs’ 1995 to 2005 after
addition of an immobilizer.
Comparatively, Volkswagen stated that
Mercedes-Benz reported that the theft
rate for the SLK class vehicles dropped
from 1.6489 in CY 2005 to 0.1484 in CY
2006 after installation of an
immobilizer.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Volkswagen on the device,
the agency believes that the antitheft
device for the new vehicle line is likely
to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). The agency
concludes that the device will provide
four of the five types of performance
listed in § 543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of part 541 either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES
29814
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 102 / Thursday, May 27, 2010 / Notices
requirements of part 541. The agency
finds that Volkswagen has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the Volkswagen new
vehicle line is likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
This conclusion is based on the
information Volkswagen provided about
its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Volkswagen’s
petition for exemption for the
Volkswagen new vehicle line from the
parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR
part 541, beginning with the 2012 model
year vehicles. The agency notes that 49
CFR part 541, Appendix A–1, identifies
those lines that are exempted from the
Theft Prevention Standard for a given
model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f)
contains publication requirements
incident to the disposition of all part
543 petitions. Advanced listing,
including the release of future product
nameplates, the beginning model year
for which the petition is granted and a
general description of the antitheft
device is necessary in order to notify
law enforcement agencies of new
vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
If Volkswagen decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major
component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Volkswagen
wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is
based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption.
§ 543.7(d) states that a part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the anti-theft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for
the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify
an exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that § 543.9(c)(2)
could place on exempted vehicle
manufacturers and itself. The agency
did not intend in drafting part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:26 May 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: May 24, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010–12809 Filed 5–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
May 19, 2010.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirements to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. A copy of
the submissions may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding
these information collections should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury PRA Clearance
Officer, Department of the Treasury,
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite
11010, Washington, DC 20220.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before June 28, 2010 to
be assured of consideration.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
OMB Number: 1545–0742.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: EE–111–80 (TD 8019—Final)
Public Inspection of Exempt
Organization Return.
Abstract: Section 6104(b) authorizes
the Service to make available to the
public the returns required to be filed by
exempt organizations. The information
requested in Treasury Reg. section
301.6104(b)–1(b)(4) is necessary in order
for the Service not to disclose
confidential business information
furnished by businesses which
contribute to exempt black lung trusts.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 22
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–0768.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Title: EE–178–78 Final (TD 7898)
Employers Qualified Educational
Assistance Programs.
Abstract: Respondents include
employers who maintain education
assistance programs for their employees.
Information verifies that programs are
qualified and that employees may
exclude educational assistance from
their gross incomes.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 615
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–1093.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: IA–56–87 and IA–53–87 Final
Minimum Tax-Tax Benefit Rule.
Abstract: Section 58(h) of the 1954
Internal Revenue Code provides that the
Secretary shall provide for adjusting tax
preference items where such items
provided no tax benefit for any taxable
year. This regulation provides guidance
for situations where tax preference
items provided no tax benefit because of
available credits and describes how to
claim a credit or refund of minimum tax
paid on such preferences.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 40
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–1271.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: REG–209035–86 (Final) Stock
Transfer Rules; REG–208165–91 (Final)
Certain Transfers of Stock or Securities
by U.S. Persons to Foreign Corporations
and Related Reporting Requirements.
Abstract: A U.S. person must
generally file a gain recognition
agreement with the IRS in order to defer
gain on a section 367(a) transfer of stock
to a foreign corporation, and must file
a notice with the Service if it realizes
any income in a section 367(b)
exchange. These requirements ensure
compliance with the respective Code
sections.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 2,390
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–1449.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: IA–57–94 (Final) Cash
Reporting by Court Clerks.
Abstract: Section 60501(g) imposes a
reporting requirement on criminal court
clerks that receive more than $10,000 in
cash as bail. The IRS will use the
information to identify individuals with
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 102 (Thursday, May 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29812-29814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12809]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Volkswagen
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Volkswagen Group of America
(Volkswagen) petition for an exemption of the new vehicle line
[confidential nameplate] in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption
from the Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is
[[Page 29813]]
granted because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance
with the parts marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR part 541). Volkswagen requested confidential treatment for the
information it submitted in support of its petition until the market
introduction of its new MY 2010 vehicle line (expected to be not later
than December 2011). The agency addressed Volkswagen's request for
confidential treatment by letter dated April 30, 2010.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2012 model year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, W43-439, Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202)
493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated March 8, 2010,
Volkswagen requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements
of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) for the new MY 2012
vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition,
Volkswagen provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for its
new vehicle line. Volkswagen will install its fourth generation,
transponder-based electronic engine immobilizer antitheft device as
standard equipment on its new vehicle line beginning with MY 2012.
Volkswagen stated that the aim of its immobilizer device is to actively
incorporate the engine control unit into the evaluation and monitoring
process. Key components of the antitheft device will include a passive
immobilizer, a warning message indicator, an adapted ignition key, an
ignition lock reading coil, an engine control unit and an immobilizer
control unit. The antitheft device will also include an audible and
visible alarm feature as optional equipment. Volkswagen's submission is
considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements contained in Sec. 543.5 and the
specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
Volkswagen stated that it will also offer an optional advanced key
(``keyless'') device with its new vehicle line. Volkswagen stated that
with the ``keyless'' device, a transmitter in the key fob communicates
with the vehicle ignition control system to perform immobilizer and
engine start and stop functions without the need to insert a physical
key into the mechanical ignition switch device. Volkswagen further
stated that the immobilizer function is the same with both the standard
key and the keyless device.
Volkswagen stated that activation of the standard key device occurs
automatically when the transponder key is removed from the ignition
switch or when the key fob is taken outside the vehicle in the optional
advanced key device. Deactivation of the standard key device occurs
when the key is inserted, the ignition is turned on and the transponder
key is recognized by the immobilizer control unit, enabling start up of
the vehicle. After recognition by the electronic module of the key
transponder, the key is paired up with the immobilizer control module
and cannot be used for any other immobilizer. Deactivation of the
optional advanced key device occurs when the key fob transponder is
inside the vehicle and is recognized by the immobilizer control unit.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6,
Volkswagen provided information on the reliability and durability of
its proposed device. To ensure reliability and durability of the
device, Volkswagen stated that the antitheft device will be tested for
compliance to its corporate requirements for electrical and electronic
assemblies in motor vehicles related to performance.
Volkswagen stated that it believes the immobilizer device in the
new vehicle line will be effective in deterring theft as it has been in
other Volkswagen vehicle lines for which theft data has been published.
Volkswagen provided comparative data in support of its belief that its
device will be as effective in deterring and reducing vehicle theft as
those vehicle lines for which the theft data was published. Volkswagen
stated that its proposed device is similar to the antitheft device
installed on the MY 2011 Tiguan vehicle line which was granted an
exemption by the agency on December 1, 2009. Volkswagen further stated
that its device is also installed on its current Eos, Passat, Golf,
Jetta and Touareg vehicle lines. Volkswagen provided data showing that
from MY's 2005-2007, theft rates published by the agency for the Jetta,
Passat, Eos, and Golf/GTI vehicles installed with the immobilizer
device are all below the median theft rate. Specifically, the Jetta,
Passat and Golf/GTI vehicle lines have an average theft rate using
three MYs' data of 1.3058, 1.0853 and 1.4656 respectively. The Eos
vehicle line using one MY's data has a theft rate of 0.8205.
In support of its belief that its antitheft device will be as or
more effective in reducing and deterring vehicle theft than the parts-
marking requirement, Volkswagen referenced the effectiveness of
immobilizer devices installed on other vehicles for which NHTSA has
granted exemptions. Specifically, Volkswagen referenced information
from the Highway Loss Data Institute which showed that BMW vehicles
experienced theft loss reductions resulting in a 73% decrease in
relative claim frequency and a 78% lower average loss payment per claim
for vehicles equipped with an immobilizer. Volkswagen also stated that
Chrysler reported that the average theft rate for the Jeep Grand
Cherokee between MYs' 1995 and 1998 (prior to addition of an
immobilizer) was significantly reduced from 5.3574 to 2.5492 from MYs'
1995 to 2005 after addition of an immobilizer. Comparatively,
Volkswagen stated that Mercedes-Benz reported that the theft rate for
the SLK class vehicles dropped from 1.6489 in CY 2005 to 0.1484 in CY
2006 after installation of an immobilizer.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Volkswagen on the
device, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the new
vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements
of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). The agency
concludes that the device will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation;
preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants;
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
[[Page 29814]]
requirements of part 541. The agency finds that Volkswagen has provided
adequate reasons for its belief that the antitheft device for the
Volkswagen new vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing
and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). This
conclusion is based on the information Volkswagen provided about its
device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Volkswagen's petition for exemption for the Volkswagen new vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541, beginning with
the 2012 model year vehicles. The agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f)
contains publication requirements incident to the disposition of all
part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future
product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is
granted and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary
in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines
exempted from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Volkswagen decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
must formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Volkswagen wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Sec. 543.7(d) states that a part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Sec. 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Sec.
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: May 24, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-12809 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P