Liquid Crystal Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes, 28782 [2010-12427]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
28782
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 99 / Monday, May 24, 2010 / Notices
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(Reinstatement).
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
54,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 90
seconds.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,350 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Requests for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will be a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 19, 2010.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Czech
Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 75
FR 21232, April 23, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–006. Applicant:
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
21232, April 23, 2010. Instrument:
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Corporation, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 75 FR 21232, April
23, 2010.
Docket Number: 10–007. Applicant:
Washington University in St. Louis, St.
Louis, MO 63130. Instrument: Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd.,
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR
21232, April 23, 2010.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 17, 2010.
Christopher Cassel,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–12427 Filed 5–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[FR Doc. 2010–12350 Filed 5–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
[Docket No. PTO–C–2010–0045]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Liquid Crystal Institute, et al., Notice of
Consolidated Decision on Applications
for Duty–Free Entry of Electron
Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated pursuant
to Section 6(c) of the Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Materials
Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89–
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80
Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related
records can be viewed between 8:30
A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3720, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington,
D.C.
Docket Number: 10–005. Applicant:
Liquid Crystal Institute, Kent, OH
44242. Instrument: Electron Microscope.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 May 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
Extension of Period for Nominations to
the National Medal of Technology and
Innovation Nomination Evaluation
Committee
AGENCY: United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice and request for
nominations.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(United States Patent and Trademark
Office) previously published a notice in
the Federal Register requesting
nominations of individuals to serve on
the National Medal of Technology and
Innovation Nomination Evaluation
Committee. The USPTO is extending the
deadline until August 1, 2010. The
United States Patent and Trademark
Office will consider nominations
received in response to the original
notice as published on February 1, 2010,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as well as from this notice of extension
and from other sources. The
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice provides committee and
membership criteria.
DATES: Please submit nominations by
August 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Nominations should be
submitted to Richard Maulsby, Program
Manager, National Medal of Technology
and Innovation Program, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450.
Nominations also may be submitted via
fax: (571) 270–9100 or by electronic
mail to: nmti@uspto.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Maulsby, Program Manager,
National Medal of Technology and
Innovation Program, United States
Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313–1450,
telephone (571) 272–8333, or electronic
mail: nmti@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The committee was
established in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) (Title 5, United States Code,
Appendix 2). The following provides
information about the committee and
membership:
• Committee members are appointed
by and serve at the discretion of the
Secretary of Commerce. The committee
provides advice to the Secretary on the
implementation of Public Law 96–480
(15 U.S.C. 3711), as amended August 9,
2007.
• The committee functions solely as
an advisory body under the FACA.
Members are appointed to the 12member committee for a term of three
years. Each will be reevaluated at the
conclusion of the three-year term with
the prospect of renewal, pending
advisory committee needs and the
Secretary’s concurrence. Selection of
membership is made in accordance with
applicable Department of Commerce
guidelines.
• Members are responsible for
reviewing nominations and making
recommendations for the Nation’s
highest honor for technological
innovation, awarded annually by the
President of the United States. Members
of the committee must have an
understanding of, and experience in,
developing and utilizing technological
innovation and/or be familiar with the
education, training, employment and
management of technological
manpower.
• Under the FACA, membership on a
committee must be balanced. To achieve
balance, the Department is seeking
additional nominations of candidates
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 99 (Monday, May 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12427]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Liquid Crystal Institute, et al., Notice of Consolidated Decision
on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00
P.M. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue., NW, Washington, D.C.
Docket Number: 10-005. Applicant: Liquid Crystal Institute, Kent, OH
44242. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR 21232, April 23,
2010.
Docket Number: 10-006. Applicant: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
21232, April 23, 2010. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
FEI Corporation, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR
21232, April 23, 2010.
Docket Number: 10-007. Applicant: Washington University in St. Louis,
St. Louis, MO 63130. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer:
JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 21232, April 23,
2010.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: May 17, 2010.
Christopher Cassel,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-12427 Filed 5-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
