In the Matter of Certain Restraining Systems for Transport, Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Respondent's Second Amended Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a Consent Order Stipulation and To Issue a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation, 28654 [2010-12266]

Download as PDF 28654 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Notices and the individual pages be clearly marked as to whether they are the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’ version, and that the confidential business information be clearly identified by means of brackets. All written submissions, except for confidential business information, will be made available for inspection by interested parties. Some or all of the confidential business information that the Commission receives in this investigation may be included in the report that the Commission sends to the USTR. However, any confidential business information received by the Commission in this investigation and used in preparing this report will not be published in a manner that would reveal the operations of the firm supplying the information. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 14, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–12211 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–696] In the Matter of Certain Restraining Systems for Transport, Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Respondent’s Second Amended Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on a Consent Order Stipulation and To Issue a Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) granting respondent’s second amended motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on a consent order stipulation and to issue a consent order. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:40 May 20, 2010 Jkt 220001 inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on December 29, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Matthew Bullock and Walnut Industries, Inc. 74 FR 68865 (Dec. 29, 2009). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain restraining systems for transport, components thereof, and methods of using the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,089,802, 6,227,779, and 6,981,827. The complaint named Qingdao Auront Industry & Trade Co. Ltd. (‘‘Auront’’) as the sole respondent. On March 16, 2010, Auront filed a motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order stipulation. The Commission investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) opposed the motion to terminate because Auront did not satisfy the Commission Rules. On April 5, 2010, Auront filed a second motion to terminate based on a revised consent order. On April 14, 2010, Auront filed an amendment to its second motion with additional revisions to the consent order stipulation. On April 20, 2010, complainants filed an opposition to Auront’s motions. On the same day, the IA filed a response in support of termination. On April 21, 2010, the ALJ issued an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting Auront’s second amended motion to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The ALJ also concluded that, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), there is no evidence that termination of this investigation will prejudice the public interest. Accordingly, the ALJ terminated the investigation. No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 determined not to review the ALJ’s ID terminating the investigation and to issue the consent order submitted by Auront. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in § 210.45 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.45). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 17, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–12266 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–63,052] Chrysler LLC; St. Louis North Assembly Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers From HAAS TCM, Inc., Logistics Services, Inc., Robinson Solutions, and Yazaki North America; Fenton, MO; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on April 14, 2008, applicable to workers of Chrysler LLC, St. Louis North Assembly Plant, Fenton, Missouri. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2008 (73 FR 24317). The certification was amended on November 18, 2009 and December 9, 2009 to include on-site leased workers from HAAS TCM, Inc. and Logistics Services, Inc. The notices were published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2008 (73 FR 72848) and December 18, 2008 (73 FR 77069) respectively. It was amended again on October 30, 2009 to include on-site leased workers from Robinson Solutions, and again March 31, 2010 to include Logistics Management Services, and on April 20, 2010 to include Corrigan Company and Murphy Company. The notices were published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2009 (74 FR 58316), April 19, 2010 (75 FR 203832–20383), and April 29, 2010 (75 FR 22627–22628) respectively. E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-696]


In the Matter of Certain Restraining Systems for Transport, 
Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; Notice of Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting 
Respondent's Second Amended Motion To Terminate the Investigation in 
Its Entirety Based on a Consent Order Stipulation and To Issue a 
Consent Order; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 6) 
granting respondent's second amended motion to terminate the 
investigation in its entirety based on a consent order stipulation and 
to issue a consent order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on 
December 29, 2009, based on a complaint filed by Matthew Bullock and 
Walnut Industries, Inc. 74 FR 68865 (Dec. 29, 2009). The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain restraining systems for transport, components thereof, and 
methods of using the same by reason of infringement of certain claims 
of United States Patent Nos. 6,089,802, 6,227,779, and 6,981,827. The 
complaint named Qingdao Auront Industry & Trade Co. Ltd. (``Auront'') 
as the sole respondent.
    On March 16, 2010, Auront filed a motion to terminate the 
investigation based on a consent order stipulation. The Commission 
investigative attorney (``IA'') opposed the motion to terminate because 
Auront did not satisfy the Commission Rules. On April 5, 2010, Auront 
filed a second motion to terminate based on a revised consent order. On 
April 14, 2010, Auront filed an amendment to its second motion with 
additional revisions to the consent order stipulation. On April 20, 
2010, complainants filed an opposition to Auront's motions. On the same 
day, the IA filed a response in support of termination.
    On April 21, 2010, the ALJ issued an initial determination (``ID'') 
granting Auront's second amended motion to terminate the investigation. 
The ALJ found that the motion complied with the requirements of 
Commission Rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). The ALJ also concluded that, 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)), there 
is no evidence that termination of this investigation will prejudice 
the public interest. Accordingly, the ALJ terminated the investigation. 
No petitions for review of this ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ALJ's ID terminating the investigation and 
to issue the consent order submitted by Auront.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Sec.  210.45 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 
CFR 210.45).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 17, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-12266 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.