Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., a Subsidiary of Excaliber, Inc., Sandpoint, ID; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 28661 [2010-12254]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 98 / Friday, May 21, 2010 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, on May 17,
2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–12172 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–70,601]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., a Subsidiary of
Excaliber, Inc., Sandpoint, ID; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2010,
a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA),
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
negative determination was signed on
December 17, 2009. The Department’s
Notice of negative determination was
published in the Federal Register on
February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7034).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c,)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., Sandpoint,
Idaho, was based on the finding that
there was no increase of imports by the
workers’ firm or its customer and no
shift/acquisition by the workers’ firm;
nor did the workers produce an article
or supply a service that was used by a
firm with TAA-certified workers in the
production of an article or supply of a
service that was the basis for TAAcertification.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner stated that the workers should
be eligible to apply for TAA because of
the importation from Canada of boards
whose production is subsidized by the
Canadian government and that
similarly-situated workers (workers at
mills producing similar products in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 May 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
same part of the country) are eligible to
apply for TAA, specifically Welco, LLC,
Naples, Idaho (TA–W–72,655, certified
on January 25, 2010).
The basis for certification of TA–W–
72,655 was increased imports by the
major declining customers of Welco,
LLC. The increase in imports was
revealed by a customer survey
conducted by the Department.
In the case at hand, however, the
survey of the major declining customers
of the subject firm regarding their
purchases of veneer and lumber boards
revealed no increase imports nor any
increased reliance on imports on the
part of the subject firm’s customers
during the relevant time period.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered, nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination.
After careful review of the request for
reconsideration, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not
been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
May, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–12254 Filed 5–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0012]
National Advisory Committee on
Occupational Safety and Health
(NACOSH)
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for nominations to
serve on the National Advisory
Committee on Occupational Safety and
Health (NACOSH).
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary of
Labor for Occupational Safety and
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28661
Health invites interested persons to
submit nominations for membership on
NACOSH.
DATES: Nominations for NACOSH must
be submitted (postmarked, sent or
received) by July 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
nominations for NACOSH, identified by
OSHA Docket No. OSHA–2010–0012,
by any of the following methods:
Electronically: You may submit
nominations, including attachments,
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions on-line for submitting
nominations.
Facsimile: If your nomination,
including attachments, does not exceed
10 pages, you may fax it to the OSHA
Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, express delivery, hand delivery,
messenger or courier service: Submit
three copies of your nominations to the
OSHA Docket Office, Room N–2625,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350
(OSHA’s TTY number is (877) 889–
5627). Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All nominations for
NACOSH must include the Agency
name and docket number for this
Federal Register notice (Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0012). All submissions in
response to this Federal Register notice,
including personal information
provided, will be posted without change
at https://www.regulations.gov. Because
of security-related procedures,
submitting nominations by regular mail
may result in a significant delay in their
receipt. Please contact the OSHA Docket
Office, at the address above, for
information about security procedures
for submitting nominations by hand
delivery, express delivery, messenger or
courier service. For additional
information on submitting nominations,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section below.
Docket: To read or download
submissions, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information
(e.g., copyrighted material) is not
publicly available to read or download
through https://www.regulations.gov. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 98 (Friday, May 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 28661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12254]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-70,601]
Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., a Subsidiary of Excaliber, Inc.,
Sandpoint, ID; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2010, a company official requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA), applicable to workers and former workers of the
subject firm. The negative determination was signed on December 17,
2009. The Department's Notice of negative determination was published
in the Federal Register on February 16, 2010 (75 FR 7034).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c,) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination of the TAA petition filed on behalf of
workers at Ceda-Pine Veneer, Inc., Sandpoint, Idaho, was based on the
finding that there was no increase of imports by the workers' firm or
its customer and no shift/acquisition by the workers' firm; nor did the
workers produce an article or supply a service that was used by a firm
with TAA-certified workers in the production of an article or supply of
a service that was the basis for TAA-certification.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner stated that the
workers should be eligible to apply for TAA because of the importation
from Canada of boards whose production is subsidized by the Canadian
government and that similarly-situated workers (workers at mills
producing similar products in the same part of the country) are
eligible to apply for TAA, specifically Welco, LLC, Naples, Idaho (TA-
W-72,655, certified on January 25, 2010).
The basis for certification of TA-W-72,655 was increased imports by
the major declining customers of Welco, LLC. The increase in imports
was revealed by a customer survey conducted by the Department.
In the case at hand, however, the survey of the major declining
customers of the subject firm regarding their purchases of veneer and
lumber boards revealed no increase imports nor any increased reliance
on imports on the part of the subject firm's customers during the
relevant time period.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered, nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination.
After careful review of the request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of May, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-12254 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
