Child Labor Regulations, Orders and Statements of Interpretation, 28404-28461 [2010-11434]
Download as PDF
28404
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Wage and Hour Division
29 CFR Parts 570 and 579
RIN 1215–AB57
RIN 1235–AA01
Child Labor Regulations, Orders and
Statements of Interpretation
AGENCY:
Wage and Hour Division,
Labor.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
ACTION:
Final Rule.
SUMMARY: This Final Rule revises the
child labor regulations to incorporate
statutory amendments to the Fair Labor
Standards Act and to update and clarify
the regulations that establish protections
for youth employed in nonagricultural
occupations. These revisions also
implement specific recommendations
made by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health in its
2002 report to the Department of Labor.
The Department of Labor is revising the
regulations to incorporate the 2008
amendment to section 16(e) of the Fair
Labor Standards Act that substantially
increased the maximum permissible
civil money penalty an employer may
be assessed for child labor violations
that cause the death or serious injury of
a young worker.
DATES: Effective Dates: This rule is
effective July 19, 2010. The
incorporation by reference of American
National Standards Institute standards
in the regulations is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of
July 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arthur M. Kerschner, Jr., Division of
Enforcement Policy, Branch of Child
Labor and Special Employment
Enforcement, Wage and Hour Division,
U.S. Department of Labor, Room S–
3510, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202)
693–0072 (this is not a toll free number).
Copies of this Final Rule may be
obtained in alternative formats (Large
Print, Braille, Audio Tape, or Disc),
upon request, by calling (202) 693–0023.
TTY/TDD callers may dial toll-free (877)
889–5627 to obtain information or
request materials in alternative formats.
Questions of interpretation and/or
enforcement of regulations issued by
this agency or referenced in this Final
Rule may be directed to the nearest
Wage and Hour Division District Office.
Locate the nearest office by calling the
Wage and Hour Division’s toll-free help
line at (866) 4US–WAGE ((866) 487–
9243) between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. in your
local time zone, or log onto the Wage
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Hour Division’s Web site for a
nationwide listing of Wage and Hour
District and Area Offices at: https://
www.dol.gov/whd/america2.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
revisions in this Final Rule continue the
Department of Labor’s tradition of
fostering permissible and appropriate
job opportunities for working youth that
are healthy, safe, and not detrimental to
their education.
The Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) identified for this rulemaking
changed with the publication of the
2010 Spring Regulatory Agenda due to
an organizational restructuring. The old
RIN was assigned to the Employment
Standards Administration, which no
longer exists. A new RIN has been
assigned to the Wage and Hour Division.
I. Background
The child labor provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establish a
minimum age of 16 years for
employment in nonagricultural
occupations, but the Secretary of Labor
is authorized to provide by regulation
for 14- and 15-year-olds to work in
suitable occupations other than
manufacturing or mining, and during
periods and under conditions that will
not interfere with their schooling or
health and well-being. The child labor
provisions of the FLSA permit 16- and
17-year-olds to work in the
nonagricultural sector without hours or
time limitations, except in certain
occupations found and declared by the
Secretary to be particularly hazardous or
detrimental to the health or well-being
of such workers.
The regulations for 14- and 15-yearolds are known as Child Labor
Regulation No. 3 (Reg. 3) and are
contained in subpart C of part 570 (29
CFR 570.31–.37). Reg. 3 limits the hours
and times of day that such minors may
work and identifies occupations that are
either permitted or prohibited for such
minors. Under Reg. 3, 14- and 15-yearolds may work in certain occupations in
retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishments, but are not permitted to
work in certain other occupations
(including all occupations found by the
Secretary to be particularly hazardous
for 16- and 17-year-olds). Reg. 3,
originally promulgated in 1939, was
revised to reflect the 1961 amendments
to the FLSA, which extended the Act’s
coverage to include enterprises engaged
in commerce or the production of goods
for commerce and thereby brought more
working youth employed in retail, food
service, and gasoline service
establishments within the protections of
the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The regulations concerning
nonagricultural hazardous occupations
are contained in subpart E of 29 CFR
part 570 (29 CFR 570.50–.68). These
Hazardous Occupations Orders (HOs)
apply on either an industry basis,
specifying the occupations in a
particular industry that are prohibited,
or an occupational basis, irrespective of
the industry in which the work is
performed. The seventeen HOs were
adopted individually during the period
of 1939 through 1963. Some of the HOs,
specifically HOs 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and
17, contain limited exemptions that
permit the employment of 16- and 17year-old apprentices and studentlearners under particular conditions to
perform work otherwise prohibited to
that age group. The terms and
conditions for employing such
apprentices and student-learners are
detailed in § 570.50(b) and (c).
Because of changes in the workplace,
the introduction of new processes and
technologies, the emergence of new
types of businesses where young
workers may find employment
opportunities, the existence of differing
federal and state standards, and
divergent views on how best to balance
scholastic requirements and work
experiences, the Department has long
been reviewing the criteria for
permissible child labor employment. A
detailed discussion of the Department’s
review was included in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking published in the
Federal Register on April 17, 2007 (see
72 FR 19339).
Congress twice amended the child
labor provisions of the FLSA in the
1990s. The Compactors and Balers
Safety Standards Modernization Act,
Public Law 104–174 (Compactor and
Baler Act), was signed into law on
August 6, 1996. This legislation added
section 13(c)(5) to the FLSA, permitting
minors 16 and 17 years of age to load,
but not operate or unload, certain scrap
paper balers and paper box compactors
when certain requirements are met. The
Drive for Teen Employment Act, Public
Law 105–334, was signed into law on
October 31, 1998. This legislation added
section 13(c)(6) to the FLSA which
prohibits minors under 17 years of age
from driving automobiles and trucks on
public roadways on the job and
establishes the conditions and criteria
for 17-year-olds to drive automobiles
and trucks on public roadways on the
job.
The Department published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register on November 30, 1999
(64 FR 67130), inviting comments on
revisions of regulations to implement
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the 1996 and 1998 amendments and to
update certain regulatory standards.
In 1998, the Department provided
funds to the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) to conduct a comprehensive
review of scientific literature and
available data in order to assess current
workplace hazards and the adequacy of
the current child labor HOs to address
them. This study was commissioned to
provide the Secretary with another tool
to use in her ongoing review of the child
labor provisions, and of the hazardous
occupations orders in particular. The
report, entitled National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) Recommendations to the U.S.
Department of Labor for Changes to
Hazardous Orders (hereinafter referred
to as the NIOSH Report or the Report),
was issued in July of 2002. The Report,
which makes 35 recommendations
concerning the existing nonagricultural
HOs and recommends the creation of 17
new HOs, also incorporated the
comments NIOSH submitted in
response to the 1999 NPRM. The Report
is available for review on the
Department’s YouthRules! Web site at
https://www.youthrules.dol.gov/
resources.htm.
The Department recognizes NIOSH’s
extensive research efforts in compiling
and reviewing this data. However, it has
cautioned readers about reaching
conclusions and expecting revisions to
the existing HOs based solely on the
information in the Report. In the Report,
NIOSH itself recognized the confines of
its methodology and included
appropriate caveats about the
limitations of the available data and
gaps in research. Of those limitations,
the following are worth noting. The
NIOSH Report recommendations are
driven by information on high-risk
activities for all workers, not just
patterns of fatalities and serious injuries
among young workers. There is little
occupational injury, illness, and fatality
data available regarding minors less
than 16 years of age. In addition, such
data for youth 16 and 17 years of age
tend to be mixed with that of older
workers whose employment is not
subject to the child labor provisions of
the FLSA. Also, available occupational
injury, illness, fatality, and employment
data on the specific operations in the
specific industries covered by the
NIOSH Report recommendations tend to
be combined with data on other
operations and/or industries. In some
cases, this may result in a diminution of
the risk by including less risky
operations and industries in the
employment estimates. In other cases,
the risk may be exaggerated by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
including more dangerous operations/
industries in the injury, illness, or
fatality estimates.
In addition, as NIOSH was tasked
with examining issues within the
framework of the current HOs only, the
Report did not consider the extent to
which fatalities occur despite existing
HOs, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) standards, or
state laws prohibiting the activity. If
fatalities result from recognized illegal
activities, such as working with
fireworks or a power-driven circular
saw, the best strategy for preventing
future injuries may not be to revise the
regulations but to increase compliance
with existing laws through public
awareness initiatives, targeted
compliance assistance efforts, and
stepped-up enforcement activities. The
Report also did not consider potential
approaches for decreasing workplace
injuries and fatalities that provide an
alternative to a complete ban on
employment, such as safety training,
increased supervision, the use of
effective personal protective equipment,
and strict adherence to recognized safe
working practices.
Though cognizant of the limitations of
the Report, the Department places great
value on the information and analysis
provided by NIOSH. Since receiving the
Report, the Department has conducted a
detailed review and has met with
various stakeholders to evaluate and
prioritize each recommendation for
possible regulatory action consistent
with the established national policy of
balancing the benefits of employment
opportunities for youth with the
necessary and appropriate safety
protections. The Department’s 2004
Final Rule addressed six of the
recommendations.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2004, Public Law 108–199, § 108, which
was signed into law on January 23,
2004, amended the FLSA by creating a
limited exemption from the child labor
provisions for minors 14 to 18 years of
age who are excused from compulsory
school attendance beyond the eighth
grade. The exemption, contained in
section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA, allows
eligible youth, under specific
conditions, to be employed inside and
outside of places of business that use
machinery to process wood products,
but does not allow such youth to
operate or assist in operating powerdriven woodworking machines. This
exemption overrides the FLSA’s
formerly complete prohibition on the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in
manufacturing occupations contained in
section 3(l).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28405
The Department proposed revisions of
the child labor regulations to implement
the 2004 legislation, address 25 of the
remaining 29 NIOSH Report
recommendations dealing with existing
nonagricultural hazardous occupations
orders, and revise and/or clarify the
permitted and prohibited occupations
and industries and conditions and
periods of employment established for
14- and 15-year-olds by Reg. 3, in an
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on April 17, 2007 (72 FR
19337). The NPRM also proposed to
incorporate into the regulations three
long-standing enforcement positions
regarding the cleaning of power-driven
meat processing equipment, the
operation of certain power-driven pizzadough rollers, and the definition of
high-lift trucks. In addition, the
Department proposed to expand the HO
that prohibits youth from operating
power-driven circular saws, band saws,
and guillotine shears to also prohibit the
operation of power-driven chain saws,
wood chippers, and reciprocating saws.
Finally, the Department proposed to
revise subpart G of the child labor
regulations, entitled General Statements
of Interpretation of the Child Labor
Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938, as Amended, to incorporate
all the changes adopted by the agency
since this subpart was last revised in
1971.
The Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA)
(Pub. L. 110–233) was enacted into law
on May 21, 2008, after the publication
of the 2007 NPRM. GINA, among other
things, amended FLSA section 16(e) to
provide that any person who violates
the provisions of sections 12 or 13(c) of
the FLSA, relating to child labor, or any
regulation issued pursuant to such
sections, shall be subject to a civil
money penalty not to exceed $11,000 for
each employee who was the subject of
such a violation. In addition, GINA also
permits the assessment of a civil money
penalty up to $50,000 with regard to
each violation that caused the death or
serious injury of any employee under
the age of 18 years. That penalty may be
doubled, up to $100,000, when such
violation is determined by the
Department to be a repeated or willful
violation. These changes in the law
became effective May 21, 2008.
As mentioned, the NIOSH Report
made 35 recommendations concerning
the existing nonagricultural HOs. The
Department addressed six of those
recommendations in the 2004 Final
Rule published December 16, 2004 (see
69 FR 75382). The Department, in the
April 17, 2007 NPRM, based on its
determination that there was sufficient
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28406
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
data available, addressed 25 of the
remaining 29 NIOSH Report
recommendations dealing with the
existing nonagricultural hazardous
occupations orders. In an attempt to
acquire additional data needed to
address the remaining nonagricultural
NIOSH recommendations and to pursue
certain other issues not explored in the
NIOSH Report, the Department also
published an Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM)
concurrently with the 2007 NPRM (see
72 FR 19328). Because very little
substantive information was received,
the Department withdrew the ANPRM
on February 24, 2010. No proposed rule
will result directly from that
information collection effort, however,
the topics discussed in the ANPRM may
be the subject of a future rulemaking.
The comments submitted in response to
the ANPRM may be reviewed at the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, docket
identification number WHD–2007–0001.
The NIOSH Report also made 14
recommendations that impact the
current agricultural HOs and
recommended the creation of 17 new
HOs. The Department, in the ANPRM
published on April 17, 2007, requested
public comment on the feasibility of one
of those recommendations regarding the
creation of a new HO that would
prohibit the employment of youth in
construction occupations.
The Department is continuing to
review all of the remaining NIOSH
Report recommendations, but excluded
them from immediate consideration in
order to keep the size and scope of the
2007 ANPRM and NPRM manageable.
Their absence from this current round of
rulemaking is not an indication that the
Department believes them to be of less
importance or that they are not being
given the same level of consideration as
the recommendations addressing the
current nonagricultural HOs. In that
regard, the Department is nearing
completion of its thorough review of the
NIOSH recommendations that address
the agricultural hazardous occupations
orders.
II. Summary of Comments
A total of 28 comments were received
and are available for review at the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. The Docket ID for
the NPRM that generated these
comments is WHD–2007–0002.
Comments were received from trade and
professional associations; advocacy and
occupational health and safety
organizations; employers; federal, state,
and local government agencies;
representatives of schools and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
organizations that provide vocational
training to youth; and one private
citizen. The one private citizen
comment, which concerned the issue of
door-to-door sales, was incorrectly
submitted to the ANPRM docket by the
commenter and was assigned a
Document ID of WHD–2007–0001–0004.
One commenter, the International
Association of Amusement Parks and
Attractions, included comments from
three of its member organizations along
with its submission. Four of the
comments do not address any of the
issues raised by the April 17, 2007
NPRM and focus solely on topics raised
by the ANPRM that was published by
the Department on that same day. One
commenter, the National Children’s
Center for Rural and Agricultural Health
and Safety, did not address any specific
proposal but expressed concerns that
the Department has not yet
implemented the NIOSH Report
recommendations for agricultural HOs.
In regards to the nonagricultural youth
provisions, it stated that ‘‘it does not
appear that protection of youth workers
is at the heart of some of the proposed
changes, but rather the needs of
industry and special interest groups.’’
Many of the comments concerned a
single issue or a cluster of issues
impacting a single industry, but two
comments were quite extensive and
addressed almost every proposal raised
by the NPRM. These comprehensive
comments were submitted by the Young
Workers Health and Safety Network
(YWN) and the Child Labor Coalition
(CLC). The Department appreciates the
time and effort all of these commenters
devoted to their submissions.
The YWN is a subcommittee of the
Occupational Health and Safety Section
of the American Public Health
Association. It described itself as an
informal network of public health
professionals, advocates, and
government agency staff that includes
individuals from academia, public
health, labor law enforcement, health
and safety consultation and/or
enforcement, labor organizations, and
educators. The YWN reported that, in
formulating its comments, it tried to use
the following principles: The
regulations should protect youth from
significant hazards; where possible, the
regulations should be kept clear and
consistent, limiting the number of
exceptions or exemptions, thus fostering
better compliance and more effective
enforcement; and, the regulations
should allow youth to do a broad variety
of different types of potentially
rewarding work.
The CLC, which has more than 30
member organizations, described itself
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
as the largest grouping in the United
States of advocates for the protection of
the safety, health, and education of
working children. The CLC reported
that its comments are also endorsed by
the following organizations: A Better
World Foundation, A Minor
Consideration, American Federation of
Teachers, American Federation of
School Administrators, Americans for
Democratic Action, Association of
Farmworker Opportunity Programs,
Farmworker Justice, International
Initiative to End Child Labor, Migrant
Legal Action Program, National
Association of State Directors of Migrant
Education, National Consumers League,
Ramsay Merriam Fund, and the United
Food and Commercial Workers
International Union. The CLC stated
that its comments are in line with its
stated mission and objectives, which
include creating a network for the
exchange of information about child
labor, providing a forum and a unified
voice on protecting working minors and
ending child labor exploitation, and
developing informational and
educational outreach to the public and
private sectors to combat child labor
abuses and to promote progressive
initiatives and legislation. The
American Federation of Labor and
Congress of Industrial Organizations
(AFL–CIO), while submitting its own
comments, also endorsed those
submitted by the CLC.
III. Regulatory Revisions
Many of the revisions being made by
this Final Rule will result in the
redesignation of several sections and
subsections of the regulations. In order
to prevent confusion when providing
citations in this discussion, the
Department will provide, when
appropriate, both the current citation
(the citation prior to the effective date
of this Final Rule) and the new citation
(the citation that will apply on and after
the effective date of this Final Rule). For
example, the section of Reg. 3 that
prohibits 14- and 15-year-olds from
employment in occupations in
connection with warehousing and
storage would be cited as
§ 570.33(f)(2)(old) or
§ 570.33(n)(2)(new).
A. Occupations That Are Prohibited for
the Employment of Minors Between the
Ages of 14 and 16 Years of Age (29 CFR
570.31–.34)
Section 3(l) of the FLSA defines
oppressive child labor to expressly
prohibit children under the age of 16
from performing any work other than
that which the Secretary of Labor
permits, by order or regulation, upon
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
finding that it does not interfere with
their schooling or health and well-being
(see 29 U.S.C. 203(l), see also 29 CFR
570.117–.119). Before 14- and 15-yearolds may legally perform work covered
by the FLSA, the Act requires that the
work itself be exempt, or that the
Secretary determines that the work to be
performed does not constitute
oppressive child labor. The Secretary’s
declarations of what work is not deemed
oppressive for children between the
ages of 14 and 16 appear in Reg. 3 (29
CFR 570.31–.37).
Reg. 3 identifies a number of
occupations and activities that are
specifically prohibited for these minors
without regard to the industry or the
type of business in which their
employer is engaged (e.g., operating or
tending any power-driven machinery
other than office machines, see
§ 570.33(b) (old) and § 570.33(e) (new)).
Reg. 3 also incorporates by reference all
of the prohibitions contained in the
Hazardous Occupations Orders (29 CFR
570.50–.68), which identify occupations
that are ‘‘particularly hazardous’’ and,
therefore, prohibited for 16- and 17year-olds (e.g., occupations involved in
the operation of power-driven metal
forming, punching, and shearing
machines, see § 570.33(e) (old) and
§ 570.33(b) (new)).
As previously mentioned, Reg. 3 was
revised to reflect the 1961 amendments
to the FLSA which extended the Act’s
coverage to include enterprises engaged
in commerce or the production of goods
for commerce and thereby brought more
working youth employed in retail, food
service, and gasoline service
establishments within the protections of
the Act. The current § 570.34(a)
expressly authorizes the performance of
certain activities by 14- and 15-year-olds
in retail, food service, and gasoline
service establishments, while
§ 570.34(b) details those activities that
14- and 15-year-olds are expressly
prohibited from performing in such
establishments. For example, clerical
work, cashiering, and clean-up work are
authorized, whereas ‘‘all work requiring
the use of ladders, scaffolds, or their
substitutes’’ is prohibited. These special
rules currently apply only in the
designated types of business.
Since 1961, new, positive, and safe
employment opportunities have opened
up for youth in industries other than
retail, food service, and gasoline service
that the existing Reg. 3 does not
specifically address. Jobs in such areas
as state and local governments, banks,
insurance companies, advertising
agencies, and information technology
firms all normally fall outside of the
permitted establishments declared in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Reg. 3. Because these jobs are not
specifically permitted by § 570.33 (old),
they are prohibited. There has been
some confusion about this over the
years. Some employers believe that 14and 15-year-olds are permitted to be
employed in any industry or
occupations not expressly prohibited by
Reg. 3, or that any employer in any
industry is permitted to employ such
youth in the occupations permitted by
§ 570.34(a) (old). However, when those
jobs are not located in retail, food
service, or gasoline service
establishments, the provisions of
§ 570.34 (old) (both authorizations and
prohibitions) do not apply to the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds.
The exception to this rule is where there
is some discrete operation or division
that could legitimately be characterized
as such an establishment and therefore
would be subject to these rules (e.g.,
minors employed in a food service
operation at a city park or a publicly
owned sports stadium). The existing
Reg. 3 prohibits employers such as state
and local governments, banks, insurance
companies, advertising agencies, and
information technology firms from
employing 14- and 15-year-old workers
in any jobs other than those that occur
in those discrete operations or divisions
that could be characterized as retail,
food service, or gasoline service
establishments.
In 2004, in recognition of the
importance of youth employment
programs operated by public sector
employers that provide safe and
meaningful developmental
opportunities for young people, and in
response to specific requests received
from two municipalities, the
Department adopted an enforcement
position that permits state and local
governments to employ 14- and 15-yearold minors under certain conditions.
Consistent with its enforcement
position, the Department exercised its
prosecutorial discretion, as authorized
by 29 U.S.C. 216(e), and declined to cite
Reg. 3 occupations violations for the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds by
state and local governments as long as
that employment fell within the
occupations authorized by Reg. 3
(§ 570.34(a) (old)) and did not involve
any of the tasks or occupations
prohibited by Reg. 3 (§§ 570.33 and
570.34(b) (old)). The Department
enforced all the other provisions of Reg.
3, including the restrictions on hours of
work, with respect to the employment of
such minors.
The Department’s administration of
this enforcement position permitting the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds by
state and local governments has had
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28407
extremely positive results. There are
indications, as reported by state and
local governments and reflected in WHD
enforcement findings, that when such
youth are employed under the
guidelines established by the
enforcement position, that employment
does not interfere with their schooling
or with their health and well-being, and
thus is in accordance with the directive
of the FLSA.
Based upon the success of the above
enforcement position, the Department,
in the April 17, 2007 NPRM, proposed
to revise and reorganize §§ 570.33 and
570.34 to clarify and to expand the list
of jobs that are either permitted or
prohibited for minors who are 14 and 15
years of age. The Department also
proposed to remove the language that
limited the application of § 570.34 to
only retail, food service, and gasoline
service establishments. As proposed, the
revised § 570.33 detailed certain specific
occupations prohibited for 14- and 15year-olds. This revision also necessitates
a change to § 570.35a(c)(3) (old) because
it references §§ 570.33 and 570.34 as
they pertain to Work Experience and
Career Exploration Programs (WECEPs).
The Department proposed to retain all
the current prohibitions contained in
§ 570.33 but would modify the
prohibition regarding the employment
of 14- and 15-year-olds in
manufacturing occupations to comport
with the provisions of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2004, which
enacted section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA.
The NPRM proposed to continue to
allow the employment of 14- and 15year-olds in all those retail, food service,
and gasoline service establishment
occupations in which they are currently
permitted to be employed.
The Department also proposed to
apply to FLSA-covered nonagricultural
employers of minors, with certain
modifications, all the permitted
occupations contained in § 570.34(a)
(old) and all the prohibited occupations
contained in § 570.34(b) (old) that
currently apply only to retail, food
service, and gasoline service
establishments. This proposal would be
accomplished by revising § 570.34 to
identify permitted occupations. The
Department also proposed to continue
to permit youth 14- and 15-years of age
to perform those occupations involving
processing, operating of machines, and
working in rooms where processing and
manufacturing take place, that are
currently permitted under § 570.34(a)
(old), as referenced in § 570.34(b)(1)
(old).
As mentioned, certain modifications
to the existing lists of permissible and
prohibited occupations were also
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28408
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
proposed. The traditionally prohibited
occupations and industries would, after
adoption of the proposal, be contained
in a revised § 570.33, and all the
permitted occupations and industries
would be contained in a revised
§ 570.34. The Department is aware that,
given the FLSA’s mandate that before
14- or 15-year-olds may legally be
employed to perform any covered work,
the Secretary of Labor must first
determine that the work to be performed
does not constitute oppressive child
labor, it could choose to publish only a
list of permissible occupations and
industries, and not provide a list of
certain commonly arising prohibited
occupations and industries. However,
the Department believes that by
continuing the long-standing Reg. 3
tradition of publishing lists of those
occupations and industries in which
such youth may be employed as well as
detailed examples of those industries
and occupations in which the
employment of such youth is
prohibited, it can greatly enhance the
public’s understanding of these
important provisions. The list of
prohibited industries and occupations
helps to define and to provide clarity to
the list of permitted industries and
occupations. However, the list of
prohibited occupations is not intended
to identify every prohibited occupation,
but rather only to provide examples of
those prohibited occupations that have
historically been the most common
sources of violations or concern. As
previously explained, any job not
specifically permitted is prohibited.
The Department also understands
that, given the constant development
and changes occurring in the modern
workplace, in continuing to provide a
definitive list of permitted occupations
and industries, it may unintentionally
discourage the creation of positive and
safe employment opportunities for
young workers. But the Department
believes that, by continuing its past
practice of carefully reviewing inquiries
regarding individual occupations or
industries not currently addressed by
Reg. 3 and then exercising its
prosecutorial discretion and issuing
enforcement positions that may
eventually lead to rulemaking—as
evidenced by certain revisions
contained in this Final Rule—it has
developed an efficient and effective
mechanism which overcomes the
limitations of a definitive list. The
Department firmly believes that the
limited and public exercise of its
prosecutorial discretion is an efficient
and legal tool available to the Secretary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
in the administration of the child labor
provisions of the FLSA.
The modifications to the list of
prohibited occupations are as follows:
1. Prohibited Machinery (§§ 570.33–.34)
Section 570.33(b) (old) prohibits
youth 14 and 15 years of age from
employment in occupations involving
the operation or tending of any powerdriven machinery other than office
equipment. The Department has always
interpreted the term power-driven
machinery very broadly to include
machines driven by electrical,
mechanical, water, or other power such
as steam or hydraulic. The term also
includes battery-operated machines and
tools, but does not apply to machines or
tools driven exclusively by human hand
or foot power.
Even though this prohibition is clear
and quite broad, other sections of Reg.
3 have traditionally named certain
pieces of power-driven machinery so as
to eliminate any doubt or confusion as
to their prohibited status. For example,
§ 570.34(a)(6) (old) prohibits the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in
the operation of power-driven mowers
or cutters and § 570.34(b)(6) (old)
prohibits the employment of such
minors in occupations that involve
operating, setting up, adjusting,
cleaning, oiling, or repairing powerdriven food slicers, grinders, choppers,
and cutters, and bakery-type mixers.
The Department proposed to combine
§§ 570.33(b), 570.34(a)(6), and
570.34(b)(6)—all of which address
power-driven machinery—into a single
paragraph located at § 570.33(e) and
expand the list of examples of
prohibited equipment to include powerdriven trimmers, weed-eaters, edgers,
golf carts, food processors, and food
mixers. Even though Reg. 3 for many
years has prohibited the employment of
14- and 15-year-olds to operate any
power-driven equipment other than
office machines, the Department
routinely receives inquiries as to the
status of these individual pieces of
equipment under Reg. 3. The
Department believes that by continuing
to reference certain common prohibited
machinery by name, both clarity and
compliance will be increased.
The Department received six
comments on this proposal. The YWN,
CLC, and AFL–CIO supported the
proposal to consolidate those
subsections of Reg. 3 dealing with
power-driven machinery into a single,
new subsection located at § 570.33(e)
and to expand the list of prohibited
machinery, with certain caveats. The
YWN and the AFL–CIO recommended
that 14- and 15-year-olds also be
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
prohibited from using espresso makers
because, as the YWN reported, these
machines involve a potential for serious
burns. They create steam at a
temperature that ‘‘clearly exceeds the
temperature limits established for
prohibiting use of other equipment such
as anything related to hot oil that
exceeds a temperature of 100 degrees F.’’
A representative of the Billings,
Montana Job Service also questioned
how the Department’s proposal
addresses the employment of youth who
operate espresso machines.
The AFL–CIO and the CLC
recommended that all-terrain vehicles
(ATVs) be added to the list of prohibited
machinery because, as the CLC reported
‘‘The serious hazards of operating ATVs
have been extensively documented.’’
Neither commenter provided any data
or insight regarding how extensively
ATVs are used by youth in
nonagricultural employment or whether
the documented hazards resulted in
occupational injuries. The CLC also
recommended that the proposed
§ 570.33 include an introductory
statement reinforcing the principle
detailed in § 570.32 (new) that all work
that is not specifically permitted is
prohibited.
The YWN also recommended that the
Department specifically list ‘‘bladed
blenders used to chop food items such
as cookies or candy with ice cream to
make ice cream desserts’’ as a prohibited
machine in the revised § 570.33(e) as
that subsection already prohibits the
operating or tending of food grinders,
food choppers, and cutters (see
§ 570.34(b)(6) (old)).
The National Council of Chain
Restaurants (the Council), which
described itself as a national trade
industry group representing the
interests of the nation’s largest multiunit, multi-state chain restaurant
companies, requested that the proposed
§ 570.33(e) include additional language
which would emphasize that 14- and
15-year-olds would continue to be
permitted to operate all those pieces of
kitchen equipment listed in
§ 570.34(a)(7) (old) once the Final Rule
becomes effective.
The Council commented that it
believes table top food processors and
food mixers pose little risk of harm to
the safety and well-being of 14- and 15year-olds and questions why the
Department continues to prohibit such
youth from operating them (see
§ 570.34(b)(6) (old) and § 570.33(e)
(new)). The Council submitted no data
to substantiate this comment.
The Director of the Labor Standards
and Safety Division of the Alaska State
Department of Labor and Workforce
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Development (DOLWD) also supported
the consolidation and listing of
prohibited equipment with some
exceptions. The DOLWD recommended
that 14- and 15-year-olds should be
permitted to operate weed eaters that
use monofilament line (but not weed
eaters that use metal blades) provided
adequate eye and hearing protection are
in place. That same office recommended
that such youth be permitted to operate
certain small, residential-sized washing
machines and dryers when all safety
equipment is properly installed.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal, as
presented, with one modification. The
Department will add ATVs to the list of
prohibited equipment presented in the
revised § 570.33(e) (new) as
recommended by the AFL–CIO and
CLC. As power-driven equipment, ATVs
were, and continue to be, included in
the broad prohibitions of this
subsection. In addition, because ATVs
are motor vehicles as defined by
§ 570.52(c) (old and new), 14- and 15year-olds would be prohibited from
operating such equipment under
§ 570.33(c) (old) and § 570.33(f) (new).
But because greater clarity and
protections can be realized, the
Department will add ATVs to the list of
named equipment.
With regard to cooking and the use of
kitchen equipment, the Department
notes that it implemented new rules
concerning the types of cooking that
may be performed by 14- and 15-yearolds in its Final Rule published in the
Federal Register on December 16, 2004
(69 FR 75382). That Final Rule limited
permitted cooking duties to cooking (1)
with electric or gas grills which does not
involve an open flame (see
§ 570.34(b)(5)(i) (old) and § 570.34(c)
(new)), and (2) cooking with deep fryers
that are equipped with and utilize a
device which automatically lowers the
baskets into the hot oil or grease and
automatically raises the baskets from the
hot oil or grease (see § 570.34(b)(5)(ii)
(old) and § 570.34(c) (new)). The 2004
Final Rule, however, did not change the
types of equipment and devices that 14and 15-year-olds were permitted to, and
continue to be permitted to, operate in
accordance with § 570.34(a)(7) (old) and
§ 570.34(i) (new). The list of permitted
equipment includes, but is not limited
to, dishwashers, toasters, dumbwaiters,
popcorn poppers, milk shake blenders,
coffee grinders, automatic coffee
machines, devices used to maintain the
temperature of prepared foods, and
microwave ovens that do not have the
capacity to warm above 140 °F.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Although there may have been some
confusion among employers, the
Department has long interpreted the
term toaster to mean that type of
equipment that was generally found in
snack bars and lunch counters when
Reg. 3 was issued and used to toast such
items as slices of bread and English
muffins. This includes such equipment
as the two- or four-slice ‘‘pop-up’’
toasters similar to those manufactured
for home use and the conveyor-type
bread toaster now often found at selfservice breakfast buffets. Broilers,
automatic broiler systems, high speed
ovens, and rapid toaster machines used
at both quick service and full-service
restaurants to toast such items as buns,
bagels, sandwiches, and muffins—all of
which operate at high temperatures,
often in excess of 500 °F—are not
toasters under § 570.34(a)(7) (old) and
§ 570.34(i) (new) and minors generally
must be at least 16 years of age to
operate them.
There has also been some confusion
among employers as to what constitutes
a milk shake blender under Reg. 3. The
Department has long interpreted this
term to mean that type of equipment
that was generally found in snack bars
and lunch counters when Reg. 3 was
issued and used to prepare a ‘‘to-order’’
milk shake for an individual customer.
Such equipment required that the
worker place the ice cream, milk, and
flavorings in a stainless steel mixing cup
that generally has a maximum capacity
of 20 ounces. The cup was then
positioned on the machine so that the
single spindle—with an aeration disk or
disks mounted at the bottom—could
blend the milk shake. Some permitted
milk shake blenders had more than one
spindle so multiple products could be
processed simultaneously. Most of these
blenders were free standing counter-top
models while others were incorporated
into other equipment such as milk
dispensers. These are the types of milk
shake blenders that 14- and 15-year-olds
may operate under Reg. 3.
Except as described below, other
types of blenders, mixers, and
‘‘blixers’’—used for a variety of food
preparation operations including the
blending of milk shakes—continue to be
prohibited to that age group. Such
prohibited equipment often have
containers or mixing chambers that
exceed a 20-ounce capacity—some can
accommodate up to 60 quarts. In
addition, some of this prohibited
equipment, when used to process meat
or mix batter—with or without the use
of special ‘‘attachments’’—may not be
operated by employees under the age of
18 because of the prohibitions of HO 10
or HO 11, respectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28409
The Department has also included
certain countertop blenders used to
make beverages such as milk shakes,
fresh fruit drinks, and smoothies within
the term milk shake blender as used in
Reg. 3. Such machines generally consist
of a base motor that supports a glass jar.
The blending blades are attached, often
permanently, to the bottom of the glass
jar. Operators place the glass jar on top
of the base, place the ingredients in the
jar, affix the lid to the jar, press the
appropriate button or switch, and blend
the product. The permitted blenders are
identical to models used in private
homes, generally do not operate at more
than 600 watts, and have jar capacities
that do not exceed 8 cups (64 ounces).
As with the blenders discussed above,
their operation by minors under the age
of 18 is prohibited under HO 10 when
used to process meat.
For these reasons, the Department
does not agree with the YWN’s
understanding that the existing
regulation prohibits 14- and 15-yearolds from operating blenders that create
ice cream desserts as the Department
has previously opined that this
equipment is a type of ‘‘milk shake
blender’’ which has long been permitted
by § 570.34(a)(7) (old) and will continue
to be permitted by § 570.34(i) (new).
The Department also notes that Reg. 3
has for many years prohibited young
workers from operating compact power
mixers or blenders, also know as
‘‘immersible wands’’ and ‘‘immersion
blenders,’’ used for such tasks as
liquefying soups and sauces and
pureeing fruits, meats, and vegetables.
Such equipment is often used in
kitchens and by dietary aides at
hospitals and nursing homes. The use of
such equipment would also be
prohibited by HO 10 when the mixer or
wand is equipped with knives, blades,
or cutting tools designed for use on meat
and poultry.
The Department did not propose to
prohibit, and the Final Rule does not
prohibit, 14- and 15-year-olds from
operating espresso machines as
recommend by the YWN, the AFL–CIO,
and the representative of the Billings,
Montana Job Service. Section
570.34(a)(7) (old) specifically includes
automatic coffee machines on the list of
equipment that 14- and 15-year-olds
may operate (see § 570.34(i) (new)). The
Department has previously opined that
espresso makers and cappuccino makers
are types of automatic coffee machines
and therefore 14- and 15-year-olds are
permitted to operate them under the
provisions of Reg. 3. The Department
notes that the YWN’s comment that the
temperature reached by espresso makers
‘‘exceeds the temperature limits
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28410
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
established for prohibiting use of other
equipment such as anything related to
hot oil that exceeds a temperature of 100
degrees F’’ does not comport with either
the previous or revised provisions of
Reg. 3. The temperature of 100° F, when
presented in § 570.34(a)(7) (old) and
§ 570.34(i) (new), does not apply to the
operation of kitchen equipment or to
such permitted activities as cooking
with certain grills or deep fryers.
Instead, these subsections state that the
minors are permitted to ‘‘clean kitchen
equipment (not otherwise prohibited),
remove oil or grease, pour oil or grease
through filters, and move receptacles
containing hot grease or hot oil, but only
when the equipment surfaces,
containers, and liquids do not exceed a
temperature of 100 °F.’’
The Department has decided not to
adopt the Council’s recommendation to
revise Reg. 3 to permit 14- and 15-yearolds to operate table top food processors
and food mixers as no such proposal
was contemplated by the NPRM and no
data has been received that
demonstrates that 14- and 15-year-olds
can safely operate such equipment. The
Department does, however, address the
issue of older youth operating certain
counter-top mixers later in this Final
Rule with regard to HO 11.
The Department does not accept the
DOLWD’s recommendation that Reg. 3
be revised to permit 14- and 15-yearolds to operate certain weed-eaters
because of the potential for injury
associated with the operation of such
equipment. In fact, as discussed earlier,
weed-eaters are among the equipment
the Department is adding as an example
of power-driven machinery such youth
are prohibited from operating (see
§ 570.33(e) (new)). The Department
continues to be concerned about issues
involving injuries to workers resulting
from flying objects, burns, fuel safety,
and improper ergonomics. In its
Document #5108, Weed Trimmers Can
Throw Objects and Injure Eyes, the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
estimated that, in 1989, there were
approximately 4,600 injuries associated
with power lawn trimmers or edgers
that required emergency room
treatment. It reported that about onethird of those injuries were to the eye.
Nor does the Department accept
DOLWD’s recommendation to allow 14and 15-year-olds to operate certain
residential-style clothes washers and
dryers. Not only is the operation of such
power-driven machinery prohibited by
§ 570.33(b) (old) and § 570.33(e) (new),
the laundering of clothes and other
materials generally constitutes a
‘‘processing occupation’’ which is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
prohibited under § 570.33(a) (old and
new).
Finally, the Department has
determined that the Final Rule provides
sufficient clarity that it is not necessary
to adopt the CLC’s recommended
revision to the opening sentence of
§ 570.33 to repeat the statement
contained in § 570.32 (‘‘Employment
that is not specifically permitted is
prohibited.’’). For the same reason, the
Department has decided not to accept
the Council’s recommendation that
§ 570.33(e) be revised to emphasize that
youth will continue to be permitted to
operate all kitchen equipment they were
permitted to operate prior to the
adoption of this Final Rule, as the list
of permissible kitchen equipment is set
forth in § 570.34(i)(new).
2. Loading of Personal Hand Tools Onto
Motor Vehicles and Riding on Motor
Vehicles (§§ 570.33(f) and 570.34(b)(8))
Section 570.33(c) (old) prohibits the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in
the operation of motor vehicles or
service as helpers on such vehicles. The
term motor vehicle is defined in
§ 570.52(c)(1). The Department has
interpreted the Reg. 3 prohibition
regarding service as helpers on a motor
vehicle to preclude youth under the age
of 16 from riding anywhere outside the
passenger compartment of the motor
vehicle. Such youth may not ride in the
bed of a pick-up truck, on the running
board of a van, or on the bumper of a
refuse truck. This interpretation dates
back to at least the 1940 enactment of
HO 2, which prohibits 16- and 17-yearolds from serving as outside helpers on
motor vehicles.
The Department does not interpret the
helper prohibition as applying to 14and 15-year-olds who simply ride inside
a motor vehicle as passengers and, thus,
Reg. 3 permits a 14- or 15-year-old,
under certain circumstances, to ride
inside the enclosed passenger
compartment of a motor vehicle
operated by a driver whose employment
complies with the conditions specified
in HO 2. For example, a minor may ride
in a motor vehicle to reach another work
site where he or she will perform work,
to receive special training or
instructions while riding, or to meet
other employees or customers of the
employer. While a 14- or 15-year old
may be a passive passenger in a vehicle,
that same minor is not permitted to ride
in a motor vehicle when a significant
reason for the minor being a passenger
is for the purpose of performing work in
connection with the transporting—or
assisting in the transporting—of other
persons or property. Such work would
include, for example, delivering items to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a customer or assisting passengers with
the loading and unloading of their
luggage in conjunction with the
operation of an airport shuttle van. This
interpretation comports with the
provision of § 570.33(f)(1) (old), which
prohibits the employment of 14- and 15year-olds in occupations in connection
with the transportation of persons or
property by highway. Performing work
in connection with the transportation of
other persons or property does not have
to be the primary reason for the trip for
this prohibition to apply.
The Department proposed to include
its long-standing interpretation that
prohibits 14- and 15-year-olds riding
outside of motor vehicles in Reg. 3 at
§ 570.33(f) (new). The Department also
proposed to revise Reg. 3 at § 570.34(o)
(new) to permit 14- and 15-year-olds to
ride in the enclosed passenger
compartments of motor vehicles, except
when a significant reason for the minors
being passengers in the vehicle is for the
purpose of performing work in
connection with the transporting—or
assisting in the transporting—of other
persons or property. The proposal
required that each minor must have his
or her own seat in the passenger
compartment, each seat must be
equipped with a seat belt or similar
restraining device, and the employer
must instruct the minors that such belts
or other devices must be used. These
provisions mirror the requirements of
the Drive for Teen Employment Act as
contained in HO 2.
In addition, the Department’s
interpretation of prohibited helper
services under § 570.33(c) (old), since at
least the mid-1950s, has included the
loading and unloading of materials from
motor vehicles when the purpose of the
operation of the vehicle is the
transportation of such materials. Section
570.33(f)(1) (old) furthers this
prohibition by banning the employment
of minors in occupations in connection
with the transportation of property by
highway. Section 570.34(b)(8) (old)
prohibits the employment of such youth
by retail, food service, and gasoline
service establishments to load or unload
goods to and from trucks, railroad cars,
or conveyors. These prohibitions are
designed to protect young workers from
the hazards associated with loading
docks, motor vehicles, and receiving
departments; strains from lifting and
moving heavy items; and falls and
falling items. Accordingly, 14- and 15year-olds generally have been
prohibited from loading and unloading
any property (not just ‘‘goods’’) onto and
from motor vehicles, including the light
personal hand tools they use in
performing their duties.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
In 2000, the Department was
requested by a municipality (the City) to
review certain aspects of the
prohibitions against employing 14- and
15-year-olds to load onto and unload
items from motor vehicles. The City
advised the Department that, even with
the adoption of the enforcement
position that permits state and local
governments to employ minors under
certain conditions, it was being forced
to abandon a youth-employment
program that provided 14- and 15-yearolds with certain jobs because of the
prohibition against loading materials
into vehicles. The City specifically
requested permission to allow such
minors to load and unload, onto and
from motor vehicles, the light, nonpower-driven tools each youth would
personally use as part of his or her
employment. The Department carefully
considered this request and, again using
its prosecutorial discretion, decided that
it would not assert a violation of the
child labor provisions when 14- and 15year-old employees of state and local
governments loaded and unloaded the
light non-power-driven hand tools—
such as rakes, hand-held clippers, and
spades—that they personally use as part
of their employment. The City was
advised that this enforcement policy did
not extend to other prohibited
transportation-related work such as the
loading or unloading of materials other
than the light hand tools the minors
may use on-the-job, such as trash or
garbage, or power-driven equipment
such as lawn mowers, edgers, and weed
trimmers—the use of which by this age
group is prohibited under Reg. 3.
The Department proposed to revise
Reg. 3 at new §§ 570.33(f) and (k) and
570.34(k) to incorporate the
enforcement position that allows 14and 15-year-olds to be employed to load
onto and unload from motor vehicles
the light non-power-driven personal
hand tools they use as part of their
employment and to make it available to
all covered employers, not just state and
local governments. Such light nonpower-driven hand tools would include,
but are not limited to, rakes, hand-held
clippers, shovels, and brooms, but
would not include items like lawn
mowers or other power-driven lawn
maintenance equipment. In addition,
such minors would be permitted to load
onto and unload from motor vehicles
any personal protective equipment they
themselves will use at the work site and
any personal items such as backpacks,
lunch boxes, and coats their employers
allow them to take to the work site.
Such minors would not be permitted to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
load or unload such jobsite-related
equipment as barriers, cones, or signage.
The Department received four
comments addressing the proposal
regarding riding on motor vehicles. The
AFL–CIO and the DOLWD supported
this proposal as written. The YWN
supported the proposal with additional
requirements. The YWN recommended
that the proposed requirements that
each seat occupied by a minor be
equipped with a seat belt or similar
restraining device and that the employer
instruct the minors that such belts or
other device must be used so that the
employer is required to ensure that the
seat belt or other device is actually used.
In addition, the YWN would require
that the driver of the vehicle
transporting the minors have a valid
driver’s license. The CLC objected to the
Department’s proposal, stating that it
did not have sufficient information on
the underlying rationale for the
proposed change to adequately
comment on it. The CLC did, however,
recommend that the seat restraining
devices should ‘‘be required to be
manufacturer-issued and not
homemade, and the employer should be
required to ‘ensure,’ and not just
‘instruct’ that the restraining devices be
used by the children.’’
The Department received four
comments concerning the loading of
personal hand tools onto motor vehicles
at § 570.34(k) (new). The AFL–CIO
supported the proposal as written. The
CLC again stated that it did not have
enough information to adequately
comment on the proposal. The YWN
agreed with this proposal with the
added requirements that ‘‘[w]ritten
permission from parent or legal
guardian is required to permit employer
to transport 14- and 15-year-olds and a
copy of written permission must be
maintained by employer’’ and ‘‘[a] minor
cannot be abandoned at worksite
without adult supervision.’’ The
DOLWD supported the proposal
provided adequate safety provisions
were in place. The DOLWD stated that
‘‘[t]hese provisions would include that
the vehicle shall not be running and
must be properly secured with the
wheels blocked during any loading and
unloading operations.’’
After carefully considering all the
comments, the Department has decided
to adopt the proposal as originally
written, with one modification and
minor editorial changes. The
Department noted in its 2007 NPRM
that it did not interpret the Reg. 3 helper
prohibitions as applying to 14- and 15year-olds who ride inside the enclosed
passenger compartment of a motor
vehicle when driven by a driver whose
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28411
employment complies with HO 2 under
specified conditions (see 72 FR 19343).
The Department believes this longstanding important safety-affecting
interpretation requiring compliance
with HO 2 should be included in the
regulatory language. In addition, the
Department believes that the drivers of
the vehicles transporting the young
workers should, as recommended by the
YWN, hold valid state drivers’ licenses.
Accordingly, the Department has added
the following sentence at the end of
§ 570.34(o): In addition, each driver
transporting the young workers must
hold a State driver’s license valid for the
type of driving involved and, if the
driver is under the age of 18, his or her
employment must comply with the
provisions of § 570.52.
While the Department appreciates the
remaining safety-affecting
recommendations made by the YWN,
CLC, and DOLWD, it believes the
provisions of the original proposal,
when coupled with other existing state
and federal provisions dealing with the
safe operation of motor vehicles, will
provide ample protections to young
workers. In addition, when drafting the
proposal regarding youth riding as
passive passengers in motor vehicles,
the Department looked for guidance for
establishing the criteria regarding the
use of seat belts or other safety
restraining devices. The most recent
guidance came from Congress with the
enactment of The Drive for Teen
Employment Act, Public Law 105–334,
in 1998. This legislation added section
13(c)(6) to the FLSA, which permits 17year-olds to perform certain limited onthe-job driving under very specific
conditions. One such condition is that
the vehicle be equipped with a seat belt
for the driver and any passengers and
that the young driver’s employer has
instructed the youth that the seat belts
must be used when driving the vehicle.
The Department believes by adopting in
Reg. 3 the identical language contained
in HO 2 (see § 570.52(b)), it not only
provides a high degree of protection to
young workers but also avoids potential
confusion.
3. Work in Meat Coolers and Freezers
(§ 570.34(b)(7))
Section 570.34(b)(7) (old) prohibits
14- and 15-year-olds from working in
freezers and meat coolers. Since this
section’s inception, the Department has
interpreted it to mean that such youth
are prohibited from working as dairy
stock clerks, meat clerks, deli clerks,
produce clerks, or frozen-food stock
clerks where their duties would require
them to enter and remain in the freezer
or meat cooler for prolonged periods.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28412
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Inventory and cleanup work, involving
prolonged stays in freezers or meat
coolers, are also prohibited. On the
other hand, the Department has adopted
an enforcement position since at least
1981 that counter workers in quick
service establishments or cashiers in
grocery stores whose duties require
them to occasionally enter freezers only
momentarily to retrieve items are not
considered to be working in the freezers.
In order to provide clarification, the
Department proposed to incorporate this
long-standing interpretation into the
regulations at § 570.33(i) (new).
The Department received four
comments on this proposal. The Council
supported the proposal as written. The
YWN not only disagreed with the
proposal but suggested that the current
prohibitions detailed at § 570.34(b)(7)
(old) be expanded to include ‘‘any
freezer or cooler regardless of product,
including but not limited to meat,
seafood, poultry or other produce.’’ The
AFL–CIO supported the proposal but
suggested that employers be required to
keep the door open while the minor was
inside the freezer, that the freezer door
be equipped with an emergency release
mechanism to ensure the youth can
escape if the door is mistakenly shut,
and that the employer provide
unobstructed entry to and egress from
the freezer. The CLC also made the same
three recommendations as the AFL–CIO
and stated that ‘‘[e]ven if DOL’s
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) has similar
rules, these should be incorporated into
the child labor regulations so that a DOL
Wage and Hour Division inspector
could assert a child labor violation
rather than having the employer face
two inspections, one by the Wage and
Hour Division and another by OSHA.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal as
originally written with a conforming
clarification in § 570.34(i). Even though,
under this rule, 14- and 15-year-olds
may only occasionally enter freezers
momentarily to retrieve items (see
§ 570.33(i) (new) and § 570.34(i) (new)),
requiring that the door be kept open
while they are inside the freezer could
be unnecessarily burdensome in that,
for energy efficiency and food
sanitation, most freezers are equipped
with self-closing doors. We note, as
reported by the CLC, that OSHA, which
is the recognized expert in occupational
safety and health issues, already has in
place important safety standards
addressing emergency release
mechanisms, panic bars, and
unobstructed paths in the workplace—
and that these standards protect all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
workers, not just those under the age of
16. The Department believes that all
these additional safety requirements,
when coupled with the provisions of the
revised § 570.33(i), adequately protect
young workers who momentarily enter
freezers. WHD and OSHA, as
recommended by the CLC, will continue
their partnership to leverage the
education and outreach efforts and
enforcement actions of each agency.
Finally, the YWN’s recommendation
that the proposal be expanded to
include specific items being stored in
the freezer or cooler, such as seafood
and poultry, is unnecessary because, as
discussed above, § 570.33 is a nonexhaustive list that only sets forth
common examples of prohibited
occupations.
4. Youth Peddling
The Department proposed to amend
Reg. 3 and create § 570.33(j) to ban the
employment of 14- and 15-year-old
minors in occupations involving youth
peddling, also referred to as ‘‘door-todoor sales’’ and ‘‘street sales.’’
Controversies regarding young children
conducting commercial sales of items,
often on a ‘‘door-to-door’’ basis, are not
new. The Department has over the years
documented reports of minors, many as
young as 10 or 11 years of age, working
as part of mobile sales crews, selling
such items as candy, calendars, and
greeting cards for profit-making
companies. Injuries, and even deaths,
have occurred as the result of young
children engaging in youth peddling
activities. The door-to-door sales
industry employing these minors
generally is composed of a number of
crew leaders who, during the course of
a year, operate in many different states.
The crew leaders, who often have ties to
regional or national businesses,
mistakenly claim that they and their
young sales crews are independent
contractors. Typically, a crew leader
attempts to saturate a particular area
with sales crews, make as many sales as
possible, and then quickly move to a
new location. Crews often work from
late afternoon to late at night as that is
when most of the potential customers
are likely to be at home. Because youth
peddlers typically qualify as outside
sales employees under FLSA section
13(a)(1), they are usually exempt from
the minimum wage and overtime
requirements of the FLSA (see 29 CFR
541.500).
Congressional hearings and the
Department’s enforcement experience
have shown that the problems
associated with children performing
door-to-door sales and street sales are
numerous. These youth are often
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
transported by crew leaders in vans,
which fail to meet proper safety and
insurance requirements, to areas quite
distant from their home neighborhoods.
They are often required to work many
hours on school nights and late into the
evening. These minors are frequently
placed by employers, without adult
supervision, at subway entrances,
outside large office buildings, at hightraffic street corners, and on median
strips at busy intersections where they
can attract potential customers. Reports
of children being abandoned, suffering
injuries from violence and motor
vehicle crashes, and being exposed to
the elements have been substantiated.
Youth have been injured and have died
as a result of these activities.
Intimidation by crew leaders is
commonly reported.
In 1987, the permanent Subcommittee
on Investigations of the Committee on
Governmental Affairs of the United
States Senate held hearings on the
Exploitation of Young Adults in Doorto-Door Sales. The hearings included a
staff study that documented many
abuses that had occurred in this
industry, including indentured
servitude, physical and sexual abuse,
and criminal activity. In 1998, the
Interstate Labor Standards Association
created a subcommittee to work towards
ending door-to-door sales by children
and recommended that the Department
of Labor act as a national clearinghouse
regarding information concerning doorto-door sales operations. In response to
the 1994 ANPRM issued by the
Department, calls for banning door-todoor sales by those under 18 years of
age were received from the National
Consumers League, the Defense for
Children International, USA, and the
Food and Allied Service Trades
Department, AFL–CIO. At least 17 states
have rules prohibiting or regulating
door-to-door sales by minors.
The Department’s proposal to prohibit
youth peddling was not limited to just
the attempt to make a sale or the actual
consummation of a sale, but includes
such activities normally associated with
and conducted as part of the individual
youth peddler’s sales activities, such as
the loading and unloading of vans or
other motor vehicles, the stocking and
restocking of sales kits and trays, the
exchanging of cash and checks, and the
transportation of minors to and from the
various sales areas by the employer.
As used here, the terms youth
peddling, door-to-door-sales, and street
sales do not include legitimate fundraising activities by eleemosynary
organizations such as cookie sales
conducted by the Girl Scouts of America
or school fund-raising events where the
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
students are truly volunteers and are not
promised compensation for the sales
they make. The term compensation
would not include the small prizes,
trophies, or other awards of minimal
value that the eleemosynary
organization may give a volunteer in
recognition of his or her fund raising
efforts. In administering the FLSA, the
Department does not consider such
individuals, who volunteer or donate
their services, usually on a part-time
basis, for public service, religious, or
humanitarian objectives, without
contemplation of pay, to be employees
of the religious, charitable, or similar
nonprofit corporations that receive their
services. In addition, FLSA section
3(e)(4)(A) excludes from the definition
of ‘‘employee’’ individuals who
volunteer to perform services for public
agencies. These provisions apply
equally whether the volunteer is an
adult or a minor.
The Department received five
comments on this proposal. One private
citizen, who submitted his comment to
the electronic docket for the ANPRM
published on April 17, 2007, was the
only commenter to oppose the proposal.
This commenter stated that through
door-to-door sales ‘‘many kids learn how
to be confident and build
communication skills with adults.’’
The DOLWD supported this proposal
and noted that Alaska State regulations
restrict any worker under the age of 18
from working in door-to-door sales. The
YWN, the AFL–CIO, and the CLC also
supported this proposal and
recommended that the prohibitions
against youth peddling be extended to
the employment of 16- and 17-year-olds.
In addition, the YWN recommended
that the Department amend the first
sentence of proposed § 570.33(j) to
prohibit sales by youth ‘‘in front or
around the outside of retail
establishments’’ as ‘‘many youth peddle
wares outside grocery stores, large chain
or box stores, etc.’’ The YWN also
recommended that the Department not
use the term ‘‘eleemosynary’’ in the
regulations but replace it with ‘‘plain
English words, such as ‘non-profit,
religious or charitable organizations’ to
assure understanding by all parties.’’
The YWN assumed that the
Department’s proposal would also ban
the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds
to perform sign waving, ‘‘including
holding or carrying of any type, posing
or acting as a sign not directly in front
of a retail establishment, or where no
direct supervision exists’’ (emphasis in
original). The YWN recommended that
such sign waving activities also be
prohibited along public roads and
grassy areas or median areas next to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
public streets or traffic. The CLC stated
that it is not clear whether such sign
waving activities would be prohibited
under the Department’s proposal.
The CLC recommended that the
proposal clarify where young employees
of retail establishments may legally
make sales. The CLC assumed that the
youth-employer’s establishment ‘‘means
inside or directly outside the
establishment, but not away from the
establishment, such as on a street corner
or parking lot. This should be made
more explicit by barring youth peddling
‘in front or around the outside of the
establishment.’’’ Finally, the CLC noted
the Department’s statement that youth
peddlers performing outside sales are
usually exempt from the minimum wage
and overtime provisions of the FLSA
and took issue with the Department’s
failure to ban peddling by 16- and 17year-olds as well. The CLC commented
that ‘‘DOL’s approach here hardly
comports with its stated desire to
balance ‘the benefits of employment
opportunities with the necessary and
appropriate safety protections’ (72 FR
19337). The benefits of an employment
opportunity in which the children
experiencing it are ‘usually’ not entitled
to minimum wage or overtime pay are
difficult to understand.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal with
certain clarifying modifications. The
Department appreciates the concerns
raised by the YWN, the AFL–CIO, and
the CLC regarding the scope of the term
youth-employer’s establishment. Under
§ 570.33(j) as originally proposed, a
retail establishment that sets up an
outside sales center to sell such things
as garden supplies, plants, outdoor
furniture, portable grills, Christmas
trees, etc., that participates in a retailer
association neighborhood ‘‘sidewalk
sale’’ event, or that routinely displays its
wares outside its building may question
whether it could use its young sales staff
in such endeavors. In order to eliminate
confusion and provide clarity, the
Department has added a statement to
§ 570.33(j) noting that the ban on youth
peddling does not prohibit a young
salesperson from conducting sales for
his or her employer on property
controlled by the employer that is out of
doors but may still properly be
considered part of the employer’s
establishment. Fourteen- and 15-yearolds may conduct sales in such
employer’s exterior facilities, whether
temporary or permanent, as garden
centers, sidewalk sales, and parking lot
sales, when they are employed by that
establishment.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28413
The Department agrees with the
recommendations of both the YWN and
CLC that the regulatory text be revised
to specifically state that 14- and 15-yearolds may not be employed as signwavers, promoting particular products,
services, or events, except when
performing the sign waving activities
directly in front of an establishment
providing the product, service or event.
Because sign wavers and those hired to
wave or hold up other products, or wear
placards, sandwich boards, or costumes
to attract potential customers are
exposed to many of the same dangers
associated with youth peddling, the
following sentence has been added to
§ 570.33(j): Prohibited youth peddling
also includes such promotion activities
as the holding, wearing, or waving of
signs, costumes, sandwich boards, or
placards in order to attract potential
customers, except when performed
inside of, or directly in front of, the
employer’s establishment providing the
product, service, or event being
advertised.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of those commenters who
recommended that the ban on youth
peddling should be extended to all
youth under the age of 18 years, but
considers such a change too substantive
to adopt without additional rulemaking.
The Department notes that the NIOSH
Report, after carefully reviewing the
available data, did not include youth
peddling as one of the 17 occupations
warranting the creation of a new
Hazardous Occupations Order (HO).
However, the Department appreciates
the AFL–CIO’s recommendation that
‘‘DOL begin gathering the necessary data
to substantiate and justify the need for
extension of this coverage for future
proposed regulations as quickly as
possible.’’
Finally, with regard to the CLC’s
comment regarding wages, the fact that
youth who conduct door-to-door sales
usually are exempt from the minimum
wage and overtime provisions of the
FLSA in no way detracts from the
Department’s stated objective to develop
updated, realistic health and safety
standards for today’s young workers that
are consistent with the established
national policy of balancing the benefits
of employment opportunities for youth
with the necessary and appropriate
safety protections. When Congress
enacted the FLSA in 1938, it created
section 13(a)(1), which provides a
complete exemption from the minimum
wage and overtime provisions for
employees employed in the capacity of
outside salesman. The definition of that
term, contained in 29 CFR 541.500,
applies regardless of the age of the
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28414
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
employee and clearly includes youth
peddlers as described in § 570.33(j)
(new). The FLSA, as amended, includes
other exemptions from the minimum
wage and overtime provisions that
impact jobs often performed by young
workers, such as those contained in
section 13(a)(3) (involving employees
employed by an establishment which is
an amusement or recreational
establishment, organized camp, or
religious or non-profit educational
conference center); section 13(a)(15)
(involving any employee employed on a
casual basis in domestic service
employment to provide babysitting
services); and section 13(d) (involving
any employee engaged in the delivery of
newspapers to the consumer). The
Department cannot enforce a minimum
wage requirement for employees whom
the Congress has statutorily exempted
from the minimum wage and overtime
provisions of the FLSA. Nor can it ban
certain employment for young workers
solely because the employees engaged
in such employment are exempt from
the FLSA’s minimum wage and/or
overtime requirements. The Department
notes that the exemption from minimum
wage and overtime contained in section
13(a)(1) for outside salespeople does not
apply to individuals employed solely to
wave signs or wear placards, sandwich
boards, or costumes to attract potential
customers as such promotion work is
not performed in conjunction with sales
actually made by those individuals (see
§ 541.503).
5. Poultry Catching and Cooping
The Department has long taken the
position that 14- and 15-year-olds may
not be employed to catch and coop
poultry in preparation for transportation
or for market because it is a ‘‘processing’’
occupation prohibited by § 570.33(a)
(old and new). Such employees are
often referred to as ‘‘chicken catchers’’ or
‘‘poultry catchers.’’ In addition, the
prohibitions against operating or
tending power-driven equipment
contained in § 570.33(b) (old) and
§ 570.33(e) (new) and the prohibition
against employment in occupations in
connection with the transportation of
property contained in § 570.33(f)(1)
(old) and § 570.33(n)(1) (new) generally
preclude the employment of such youth
as poultry catchers. These activities are
normally performed in environments
and under conditions that present risks
of injury and illness to young workers.
Working in the dark, with the only
illumination provided by ‘‘red lights’’
which the fowl cannot see, and in
poorly ventilated rooms, is not
uncommon. The risks associated with
poultry catching also occur in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
catching and cooping of poultry other
than chickens—for example, processors
of turkeys and Cornish game hens
employ similar methods of moving their
products to slaughter.
Despite the Department’s consistent
interpretation that 14- and 15-year-olds
may not be employed as poultry
catchers, employers still have questions
concerning how the regulations address
such work, and violations still occur.
For example, the Department
investigated the death of a 15-year-old
male in 1999 who was employed as a
poultry catcher, working in the dark and
under red lighting, in Arkansas. The
youth was electrocuted shortly after
midnight when he bumped into a fan
while performing his ‘‘catching’’ duties.
In order to remove any confusion and
increase employer compliance, the
Department proposed to amend Reg. 3
and create § 570.33(l) to specifically
prohibit the employment of 14- and 15year-old minors in occupations
involving the catching and cooping of
poultry for preparation for transport or
for market. The prohibition would
include the catching and cooping of all
poultry, not just chickens.
It is important to note that in those
rare instances when the catching
activities would be agricultural in
nature, such as where poultry catchers
are employed solely by a farmer on a
farm to catch poultry raised by that
farmer, the catchers would be subject to
the agricultural child labor provisions
contained in FLSA sections 13(c)(1) and
(2).
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The YWN,
AFL–CIO, and CLC all supported the
proposal as written. The CLC stated that
it welcomes the change as this work is
plainly too hazardous for 14- and 15year-olds to perform. The Department is
adopting this proposal as written with
one grammatical change.
B. Occupations That Are Permitted for
Minors Between 14 and 16 Years of Age
(29 CFR 570.33–.34)
As mentioned, section 3(l) of the
FLSA expressly prohibits children
under the age of 16 from performing any
work other than that which the
Secretary of Labor permits, by order or
regulation, upon finding that it does not
interfere with their schooling or health
and well-being (see 29 U.S.C. 203(l)).
Before a 14- or 15-year-old may legally
perform work covered by the FLSA, the
Act requires that the work itself be
exempt, or that the Secretary of Labor
has determined that the work to be
performed does not constitute
oppressive child labor. The Secretary’s
declarations of what forms of labor are
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
not deemed oppressive for children
between the ages of 14 and 16 appear in
Reg. 3 (29 CFR 570.31–.37) (old).
Reg. 3 identifies a number of
occupations or activities that are
specifically permitted for the
employment of youth 14 and 15 years of
age in retail, food service, and gasoline
service establishments. As mentioned,
the Department proposed to revise this
list of permitted occupations by
clarifying it, adding to it, and extending
its application to all employment
covered by the FLSA, except those
employers engaged in mining or
manufacturing, or any industry or
occupation prohibited by the proposed
§ 570.33. This revised list will be
contained in § 570.34 in the Final Rule.
The Department received six
comments concerning the revision of
the list of permitted occupations and/or
the expansion of the list to include
establishments other than retail, food
service, and gasoline service. Two of the
commenters made recommendations
that are beyond the purview of the
Department as they would require
changes to the statute. The DOLWD
recommended that the Department
focus on identifying the specific areas
and occupations where work is
prohibited and eliminate the specific
provisions concerning where work is
permitted. A representative of an
educational management company
called White Hat Management, LLC
(White Hat) recommended that the
FLSA’s blanket prohibition against 14and 15-year-old being employed in
manufacturing occupations should be
relaxed, stating that ‘‘in today’s day and
age when so many manufacturing jobs
are automated and operated by
computers or buttons, that a blanket
prohibition for manufacturing
employment hardly seems appropriate.’’
Such recommendations do not comport
with the FLSA’s statutory directive that
14- and 15-year-olds may not be
employed in manufacturing or mining
occupations and may only hold such
employment that the Secretary has
determined, by regulation or order, does
not constitute oppressive child labor
(see 29 U.S.C. 203(l)).
The AFL–CIO, YWN, and CLC all
expressed concern about this proposal,
stating that such sweeping changes
would allow 14- and 15-year-olds to
work in many more industries, and they
recommended that the Department
conduct further analysis. They
specifically mentioned and questioned
the efficacy of permitting youth
employment in particular industries and
employment situations.
The AFL–CIO, YWN, and CLC also
noted that this proposal would allow
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
youth to perform janitorial and clean-up
work, work already permitted within
retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishments by § 570.34(a)(6) (old), in
additional types of establishments. They
stated that such employment includes
the potential for exposure to hazardous
and toxic chemicals or to bloodborne
pathogens, particularly in medical and
dental offices, hospitals and nursing
homes, and when youth accept
employment with professional janitorial
services. There were also concerns that
14- and 15-year-olds could now become
full-time janitors and spend an entire
shift performing cleaning duties.
In addition, the CLC interpreted this
proposal as having a major impact on
messenger services. It stated that
because § 570.33(d) (old) and
§ 570.33(m) (new) prohibit the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds by
a public messenger service, adoption of
this proposal implies that employment
of such youth by a private messenger
service would be permitted. The CLC
described private messenger services as
those that ‘‘have standing contracts with
law firms, accounting firms, and other
types of businesses’’ to deliver
documents or packages. The CLC stated
‘‘[a]ny reasonable person who has seen
such couriers rushing through city
streets, dodging cars, pedestrians, and
other cyclists to deliver important
documents, would shudder to think that
14- and 15-year-olds would be able to
do this work, if DOL’s proposal becomes
the final regulation.’’
The CLC stated that adoption of this
proposal would allow 14- and 15-yearolds to perform office work for such
employers as accounting firms,
advertising agencies, mass mailing
businesses, insurance companies, and
many similar businesses. It expressed
concerns that office equipment, such as
large paper shredders and data
processing machines with exposed
moving parts, may present hazards to
young workers. In addition, the CLC
noted that such minors would be
permitted to work up to eight hours a
day and up to forty hours a week at
computers, typing or inputting data,
during non-school weeks.
Finally, a representative of the Coosa
Valley Regional Development Center
requested that 14- and 15-year-olds be
permitted to be employed in painting
activities because the ‘‘paint products in
use today do not contain lead or other
hazardous materials.’’ She stated that
prohibiting this age group from painting
activities restricts their employment
activities. She recommended that the
prohibitions involving the use of
ladders and scaffolds by this age group
be retained.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Department has carefully
reviewed all the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal as
written. The concerns of the AFL–CIO,
YWN, and CLC about increased youth
employment in several industries, such
as dry cleaning and laundry services,
treating and disposing of waste, mass
mailing enterprises, and the painting of
houses and automobiles, are unfounded.
This is because § 570.33(a) (old and
new) prohibits the employment of 14and 15-year-olds in almost all
occupations involving processing
operations—which the Department has
interpreted to include dry cleaning and
laundering, the treating and disposing of
waste, the conducting of mass mailings,
and the painting of houses and
automobiles. The Department does not
believe it is appropriate to overturn the
long-standing prohibitions against 14and 15-year-olds being employed in
construction or processing occupations
by accepting the recommendation of the
Coosa Valley Regional Development
Center to allow such youth to perform
painting activities.
In addition, § 570.33(a) (old and new)
provides additional protections as it
prevents the employment of such youth
in work places where goods are
manufactured, mined, or otherwise
processed. Fourteen- and 15-year-olds
could not be employed to clean such
work places, even after hours, because
of WHD’s long-standing interpretation
that a work place retains its character—
and child labor continues to be
prohibited—even at times when nothing
is being mined, processed, or
manufactured. It is also important to
note that all the prohibited occupations
detailed in § 570.33 (new) would be
applicable to the employment of 14- and
15-year-olds, regardless of the industries
in which they are employed.
The Department appreciates and
understands the commenters’ concerns
about the potential occupational
exposure of young workers to hazardous
and toxic chemicals or to bloodborne
pathogens. The Department believes
that the standards established by OSHA
to address such potential exposures,
which are continually under agency
review, provide vigorous protections to
all workers. The WHD is also reviewing
prohibitions regarding the potential
exposure of young workers to ionizing
radiation, as reflected in the publication
of the 2007 ANPRM.
The Department would also note that,
as mentioned by the CLC, 14- and 15year-olds have been permitted to be
employed by hospitals and nursing
homes for many years. This is because
historically such facilities, when open
to the general public, have been
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28415
considered to have a retail concept. The
Department continues to issue full-time
student subminimum wage certificates
to such employers under FLSA section
14(b) because of their retail character. In
addition, such youth have been
permitted to be employed, and have
been safely employed, as janitors at
many retail and food service
establishments over the years, including
department stores, hotels, amusement
parks, restaurants, and large discount
stores.
It is important to note that the CLC is
incorrect in its assumption that this
proposal would permit the employment
of 14- and 15-year-olds by messenger
service firms that ‘‘have standing
contracts with law firms, accounting
firms, and other types of businesses’’ to
deliver documents or small packages.
The Department has opined, as early as
1989, that the term public messenger
service involves that delivery service
rendered to a company which takes
messages, small parcels, etc. from one
party for delivery to another party. The
public messenger goes between two
parties, neither of whom is necessarily
known to the messenger. The term
public in this context refers to the
customers being served and not the
nature of the ownership of the firm.
Accordingly, a 16-year minimum age is
required for employment in such
messenger services. The CLC is correct
in its interpretation that 14- and 15year-olds are permitted under
§ 570.34(a)(4) (old) and § 570.34(g)
(new) to perform errand and delivery
work by foot, bicycle, and public
transportation for their employers when
their employers are not engaged in the
business of providing messenger
services to others.
The Department agrees with the CLC
that the adoption of this proposal will
allow 14- and 15-year-olds to be
employed to perform office work for
such employers as accounting firms,
advertising agencies, and insurance
companies; and that such youth could,
under the proper circumstances, work
as many as eight hours in a day and
forty hours in a week when school is not
in session. The Department, however,
does not agree that such an expansion
of positive youth opportunities is
improper or in any way fails to comport
with the requirements and spirit of
FLSA section 3(l). Office work
continues to be one of the safest
occupations available to young workers.
Moreover, this rule does not change the
limitations on the number of hours per
day or per week that 14- and 15-yearolds may work when school is not in
session.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28416
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
The Department also proposed to
revise § 570.34(a)(8) (old) by clarifying
that 14- and 15-year-olds may perform
car cleaning, washing, and polishing,
but only by hand (see § 570.34(n)
(new)). Such youth are prohibited from
operating or tending any power-driven
machinery, other than office equipment,
and this prohibition has always
included automatic car washers, powerwashers, and power-driven scrubbers
and buffers. The Department believes
this clarification will provide guidance
to employers.
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The YWN
supported the proposal as written. The
CLC supported this proposal but again
expressed concern based on its
erroneous assumption that such youth
could be employed to paint
automobiles. The National Automobile
Dealers Association (NADA) took
‘‘strong exception to this ‘clarification’ ’’
(emphasis in original). NADA stated
that vehicle washing ‘‘anecdotally is
known as the classic entry-level
dealership employment activity * * *
Vehicle cleaning, washing, and
polishing activities commonly involve
small portable power-washers and
hand-tool buffers’’ (emphasis in the
original). NADA stated that nowhere in
the regulatory history of § 570.34(a)(8)
or in the NIOSH Report has any
suggestion been made that powerequipment-assisted motor vehicle
cleaning, washing, and polishing
activities pose ‘‘significant safety or
health risks to 14- and 15-year-olds.’’
NADA also recommended that the word
car in § 570.34(a)(8) (old) be replaced
with the words motor vehicles so such
youth may be permitted to wash
additional types of motor vehicles such
as SUVs, station wagons, and vans.
The Department has considered the
comments and has decided to adopt the
proposal as written. The Department
believes this revision to be nothing more
than a clarification of its long-standing
interpretation of the regulations.
Contrary to NADA’s statement, Reg. 3,
of which § 570.34(a)(8) is a part, has
clearly stated in § 570.33(b) for many
years that 14- and 15-year-olds may not
be employed in ‘‘occupations which
involve the operation or tending of
hoisting apparatus or of any powerdriven machinery other than office
machines’’ (emphasis added). If
employers have allowed FLSA covered
and nonexempt 14- and 15-year-olds to
wash or polish cars and trucks using
power-driven washers or hand-tool
buffers, they have done so in violation
of the federal child labor provisions.
The NIOSH Report did not mention the
provisions of § 570.34(a)(8) because the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Report dealt exclusively with HOs,
which address work that is particularly
hazardous or detrimental to the health
and well-being of 16- and 17-year-old
minors. Even if NADA had presented
data supporting its statement that
power-equipment-assisted motor
vehicle washing and polishing poses
‘‘no significant safety or health risks to
14- and 15-year-olds,’’ the Department
notes that such a standard is
considerably more lax than the FLSA
section 3(l) standard the Secretary must
apply when determining permissible
employment opportunities for such
youth. Finally, the Department does not
accept NADA’s recommendation to
expand § 570.34(a)(8) (old) to include all
motor vehicles. The Department has
long interpreted the term cars and
trucks as used in § 570.34(a)(8) to
include station wagons, SUVs, and
passenger vans. The term does not
include larger vehicles such as buses,
tractor-trailers, and heavy-construction
equipment—all of which would
generally be considered motor vehicles
under Reg. 3 and HO 2.
The additional occupations the
Department proposed to permit 14- and
15-year-olds to perform are discussed
below:
1. Work of a Mental or Artistically
Creative Nature
The Department has routinely
received inquiries asking whether 14and 15-year-old youth may be employed
to perform certain mental or artistically
creative activities in industries not
specifically permitted by Reg. 3. The
inquiries have concerned such jobs as a
computer programmer and computer
applications demonstrator for a college,
print and runway model, and musical
director at a church or school. Often,
these inquiries involved students who
are especially gifted or career oriented
in a particular field. A strict adherence
to Reg. 3 requirements would not permit
the employment of a 14- or 15-year-old
in any of these scenarios, even though
talented and motivated youth could
safely and successfully perform these
tasks without interfering with their
schooling or health and well-being.
The Department proposed to revise
Reg. 3 at § 570.34(b) (new) to permit the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds to
perform work of a mental or artistically
creative nature, such as computer
programming, the writing of software,
teaching or performing as a tutor,
serving as a peer counselor or teacher’s
assistant, singing, playing a musical
instrument, and drawing. Permitted
work of a mental nature would be
limited to work that is similar to that
performed in an office setting and not
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
involving the use of any power-driven
equipment other than office machines.
Artistically creative work would be
limited to work in a recognized field of
artistic or creative endeavor. The
employment would be permitted in any
industry other than those prohibited by
Reg. 3 and would also be subject to all
the applicable hours and times
standards established in § 570.35 and
the prohibited occupation standards
contained in § 570.33.
The Department received comments
from the YWN and CLC on this
proposal. Both commenters supported
the proposal, but made additional
recommendations. The YWN suggested
that the Department replace the word
mental with intellectual, so that the
phrase in the subsection would read
‘‘work of an intellectual or artistically
creative nature.’’ The YWN
recommended that, for work of an
artistic nature, certain locations such as
tattoo and body piercing establishments
should be excluded due to the potential
for exposure to bloodborne pathogens.
The YWN also stated that the proposal
should prohibit youth employed in
artistic endeavors from performing work
that would expose them to carcinogenic,
toxic, or hazardous substances, or to
high heat. ‘‘For example, 14- and 15year-olds would be permitted to work
on a pottery wheel, but would be
prohibited from applying certain glazes
and would be prohibited from any work
on or around the high heats of a pottery
kiln. Another example would be that 14and 15-year-olds would be permitted to
sculpt, but would be prohibited from
welding and soldering or any functions
that expose them to heat, or to height or
other existing restrictions.’’ Finally, the
YWN believed that some artistically
creative work may ‘‘push the envelope
on exploitative labor and/or prove
detrimental to the morals of youth.’’
The CLC also supported this proposal
with additional comments and
recommendations. The CLC noted that
although the proposed § 570.34(b)
contains the statement that artistically
creative work is limited to work in a
recognized field of artistic or creative
endeavor, it does not define the term
artistic or creative endeavor. The CLC
correctly stated that another of the
Department’s regulations, 29 CFR
541.302(b), advises this term includes
such fields as music, writing, acting,
and the graphic arts. The CLC also
expressed concerns that singing and the
playing of musical instruments are often
in demand ‘‘in bars, lounges, cabarets,
and other places that 14- and 15-yearolds might best avoid. These and other
settings could cause untoward effects on
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
such youngsters’ moral health, even if
not on their physical health and safety.’’
The Department has carefully
considered the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal with one
modification. The Department agrees
with the YWN that the word intellectual
better comports with the intent of this
proposal than the word mental.
Accordingly, the Department is revising
the proposed § 570.34(b) to reflect this
suggested change.
The Department understands the
concerns of both commenters as to the
types of tasks young workers would be
permitted to perform under the
umbrella of ‘‘artistic or creative
endeavors’’ and notes that it will rely on
29 CFR 541.302(b)—which limits the
scope of this term to such fields as
music, writing, acting, and the graphic
arts—for guidance. The Department
wishes to address concerns raised by the
YWN by stating that it does not consider
tattooing or body piercing performed by
employees under the age of 16 years to
be artistically creative endeavors under
§ 541.302(b).
The Department also notes that 14and 15-year-olds who are employed in
artistic or creative endeavors will
continue to be prohibited from
performing any of the occupations or
tasks detailed in the revised § 570.33.
These prohibitions, which include work
in manufacturing and processing
occupations, the operation of most
power-driven equipment, and any
duties in work rooms or work places
where goods are manufactured or
processed, should alleviate many of the
concerns raised by the YWN and CLC.
These prohibitions would prevent a 14or 15-year-old from working in a factory
or workroom as a ‘‘molder’’ or ‘‘hand
painter’’ producing mass quantities of
nearly identical pottery or ceramic
items, but when coupled with this Final
Rule, they would permit the youth to
express his or her artistic talents to
shape by hand a unique clay pot or
sculpt a piece of art. Likewise, a 14- or
15-year-old could be employed, with all
the safeguards of §§ 570.33–.35, as a
painter of portraits but not as a painter
of automobiles or houses. Similarly, a
youth could be employed to create
unique photographs that rise to the level
of art, but would be prohibited from
developing those photographs and
working with the chemicals and
solvents commonly used in such
processing activities. In addition, the
hours standards provisions of § 570.35
restrict the number of hours and times
of day that 14- and 15-year-olds may be
employed in any FLSA-covered work,
including artistic or creative endeavors.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Finally, the Department appreciates
the concerns of both the YWN and CLC
that under the guise of ‘‘artistic or
creative endeavors’’ some employers
have attempted to employ youth in
unsafe or unsavory lines of work that, as
the commenters note, jeopardize the
morals of the young workers. For
example, the Department has
encountered a situation involving the
employment of very young females as
‘‘taxi-dancers’’ who were recruited and
paid by bars and nightclubs to dance
with male patrons, often late into the
evening. The Department was able to
quickly put an end to this unacceptable
employment by not only enforcing the
child labor and minimum wage
provisions of the FLSA, but by
partnering with local law enforcement
authorities to ensure that city and state
laws addressing community standards
were enforced. The Department believes
that the strict enforcement of such
ordinances by the appropriate
authorities will continue to be
important supplements to the
effectiveness of the federal child labor
laws.
2. The Employment of 15-Year-Olds
(But Not 14-Year-Olds) as Lifeguards
The Department proposed to revise
Reg. 3 at § 570.34(l) to permit the
employment of 15-year-olds as
lifeguards at swimming pools and water
amusement parks under certain
conditions. A local chapter of the
American Red Cross (Chapter) first
raised this issue in 2000. The Chapter
advised the Department that the Red
Cross had revised its own rules and had
begun certifying 15-year-olds as
lifeguards. Prior to 2000, according to
the Chapter, 16 years was generally the
minimum age at which the Red Cross
would provide such certification. The
Chapter inquired as to whether Reg. 3
would permit the employment of 15year-olds as lifeguards. Also in 2000, a
municipality contacted the Department
inquiring whether it could legally
employ such youth as lifeguards at its
city-owned swimming pools.
The occupation of lifeguard is not
specifically authorized in Reg. 3 as an
occupation that 14- and 15-year-olds
may perform. In response to the
inquiries, the Department adopted an
enforcement policy in 2000 that allowed
15-year-olds (but not 14-year-olds) to be
employed at swimming pools owned
and operated by state and local
governments or private-sector retail
establishments under certain
conditions. Those conditions included
that the youth be trained and certified
in aquatics and water safety by the Red
Cross or by some similarly recognized
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28417
certifying organization, and that the
youth work under conditions acceptable
to the Red Cross or some similarly
recognized certifying organization. This
enforcement position permitted such
employment at swimming pools
operated by hotels, amusement parks,
cities, and state-owned universities, but
did not permit such employment at
pools operated by non-public and nonretail establishments such as apartment
houses, country clubs, private schools,
home-owner associations, and private
health clubs. In early 2005, the
Department, after reviewing additional
information, extended this enforcement
position to permit the employment of
15-year-olds as lifeguards at all
traditional swimming pools regardless
of who owns, operates or manages the
establishments, and at those facilities of
water amusement parks that constitute
traditional swimming pools.
The Department proposed to revise
Reg. 3 by creating § 570.34(l) to
incorporate portions of the current
enforcement position. The revision
would permit 15-year-olds, but not 14year-olds, to be employed as lifeguards,
performing lifeguard duties, at
traditional swimming pools and certain
areas of amusement water parks
operated by all types of employers, if
the minors have been trained and
certified by the Red Cross or a similarly
recognized certifying organization.
The occupation of lifeguard, as used
in this subpart, entails the duties of
rescuing swimmers in danger of
drowning, the monitoring of activities at
a swimming pool to prevent accidents,
the teaching of water safety, and
assisting patrons. Lifeguards may also
help to maintain order and cleanliness
in the pool and pool areas, give
swimming instructions, conduct or
officiate at swimming meets, and
administer first aid. Additional ancillary
lifeguard duties may include checking
in and out such items as towels, rings,
watches and apparel. Permitted duties
for 15-year-olds would include the use
of a ladder to access and descend from
the lifeguard chair; the use of hand tools
to clean the pool and pool area; and the
testing and recording of water quality
for temperature and/or pH levels, using
all of the tools of the testing process
including adding chemicals to the test
water sample. Fifteen-year-olds
employed as lifeguards would, however,
be prohibited from entering or working
in any mechanical rooms or chemical
storage areas, including any areas where
the filtration and chlorinating systems
are housed. The other provisions of Reg.
3, including the restrictions on hours of
work contained at § 570.35(a), would
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28418
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
continue to apply to the employment of
15-year-old lifeguards.
Under the proposed rule, no youth
under 15 years of age, whether properly
certified or not, could legally perform
any portion of the lifeguard duties
detailed above as part of his or her
FLSA covered employment. The core
and defining duty of a lifeguard is the
rescuing of swimmers in danger of
drowning, often by entering the water
and physically bringing the swimmer to
safety. Under the Department’s
proposal, any employee under the age of
16 whose duties include this core
duty—such as a ‘‘junior lifeguard’’ or a
‘‘swim-teacher aide’’—or whose
employment could place him or her in
a situation where the employer would
reasonably expect him or her to perform
such rescue duties, would be
performing the duties of a lifeguard
while working in such a position. For
such employment to comply with Reg.
3, the employee would have to be at
least 15 years of age and be properly
certified.
A traditional swimming pool, as used
in this subpart, would mean a watertight structure of concrete, masonry, or
other approved materials located either
indoors or outdoors, used for bathing or
swimming and filled with a filtered and
disinfected water supply, together with
buildings, appurtenances and
equipment used in connection
therewith. A water amusement park
means an establishment that not only
encompasses the features of a traditional
swimming pool, but may also include
such additional attractions as wave
pools; lazy rivers; specialized activities
areas such as baby pools, water falls,
and sprinklers; and elevated water
slides. Properly certified 15-year-olds
would be permitted to be employed as
lifeguards at most of these water park
features.
Not included in the definition of a
traditional swimming pool or a water
amusement park would be such natural
environment swimming facilities as
rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, wharfs,
piers, canals, or oceanside beaches.
It is important to note that § 570.33(b)
(old) prohibits the employment of 14and 15-year-olds in occupations
involving the operation or tending of
power-driven machinery, except office
machines. This prohibition has always
encompassed the operation or tending
of all power-driven amusement park
and recreation establishment rides—
including elevated slides found at water
amusement parks. Such slides, which
often reach heights of over 40 feet, rely
on power-driven machinery that pump
water to the top of the slides which
facilitates the descents of the riders to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
the ‘‘splash-down’’ areas at the base of
the slides. Minors less than 16 years of
age may not be employed as dispatchers
or attendants at the top of elevated
water slides—employees who maintain
order, direct patrons as to when to
depart the top of the slide, and ensure
that patrons have safely begun their
ride—because such work constitutes
‘‘tending’’ as used in Reg. 3. In addition,
when serving as dispatchers or
attendants at the top of an elevated
water slide, minors under 16 years of
age are not performing, nor can they
reasonably be expected to perform, the
core lifeguard duty of rescuing
swimmers because they are so far
removed from the splash-down area of
the slide. Accordingly, even if 15-yearold minors have been certified as
lifeguards, the provisions of § 570.34(l)
would not apply to the time spent as
dispatchers or attendants at an elevated
water slide. Properly certified 15-yearold lifeguards, however, may be
stationed at the ‘‘splashdown pools’’
located at the bottom of the elevated
water slides to perform traditional
lifeguard duties.
The Department is aware that
permitting 15-year-olds to be employed
as lifeguards at such water amusement
park facilities as lazy rivers, wave pools,
and the splashdown pools of elevated
slides could be construed as allowing
these youth to tend power-driven
machinery. But the Department believes
that the overall predominance of their
responsibility to perform the core lifesaving duty of rescuing patrons who are
in the water, which they have been
properly trained and certified to
perform, outweighs the minimum,
isolated, and sporadic amount of
tending such lifeguards may potentially
be called upon to do when stationed at
wave pools, lazy rivers, and splashdown
pools.
The Department received eleven
comments in response to this proposal.
This includes three comments that were
submitted as attachments to the
comments of the International
Association of Amusement Parks and
Attractions (IAAPA). The comments
centered around the following elements
of the proposal: (1) Whether 15 should
be the minimum age for employment as
a lifeguard at a traditional swimming
pool or water amusement park; (2)
whether 16 should be the minimum age
for employment as a lifeguard at natural
environments such as lakes, rivers, and
oceanside beaches; and (3) whether 15year-olds should be prohibited from
being employed as dispatchers or
attendants at the top of elevated water
slides.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Some of the commenters supported
the entire proposal as written or
suggested only minor modifications.
The IAAPA, which describes itself as
the largest international trade
association for permanently-situated
amusement facilities worldwide,
supported this proposal. The proposal
was supported by the General Manager
of Shipwreck Island Waterpark of
Panama Beach City, Florida, whose
comments were submitted by the
IAAPA. A representative of Six Flags,
Inc. also supported the proposal and
stated that ‘‘[w]hile we still believe that
15-year-olds could safely work as
dispatchers on elevated water elements,
we find the proposed changes to be an
acceptable compromise.’’
The National Recreation and Park
Association (NRPA), which described
itself as ‘‘a non-profit organization
seeking to enhance public park facilities
and expand recreation opportunities,’’
supported the adoption of the proposed
change in regulations that would revise
Reg. 3 in order to ‘‘conditionally allow’’
15-year-olds to be employed at
traditional swimming pools and water
parks. The NRPA also supported
establishing a minimum age of 16 for
the employment of lifeguards at natural
environments. In addition, the NRPA
commented that ‘‘[l]ocal park and
recreation agencies have a great need to
find qualified, capable, and certified
lifeguards to work in their outdoor
pools, indoor pools, water amusement
park facilities, and natural bodies of
water. In proposing these regulations,
the Department will help agencies meet
their needs to hire certified lifeguards
by allowing lifeguards to begin work at
the age of 15. Expanding the eligible age
for employment as a lifeguard at
traditional swimming pools could help
these communities enhance pool safety
by providing a wider and larger
applicant pool from which to select
qualified candidates, and by increasing
lifeguard availability, make shorter
shifts an increasingly real probability.’’
The American Red Cross (Red Cross),
which has been developing and
implementing lifeguard training and
certification programs since 1914, stated
that it is ‘‘comfortable’’ with the
Department’s proposal with one small
change. The Red Cross objected to the
Department including the task of ‘‘giving
swimming instructions’’ in the list of
duties that 15-year-olds may perform
because the Red Cross lifeguard training
course does not include training on how
to give swimming instructions. Such
training is available to 15-year-olds via
a separate Red Cross Water Safety
Instructor (WSI) course. The Red Cross
recommended that the Department
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
alleviate possible public
misunderstanding by deleting ‘‘giving
swimming instructions’’ from the list of
permitted lifeguard duties.
The United States Lifesaving
Association (USLA), which described
itself as America’s nonprofit,
professional association of beach
lifeguards and open water rescuers,
reported that it ‘‘works to reduce the
incidence of death and injury in the
aquatic environment through public
education, promulgation of national
lifeguard standards, training programs,
promotion of high levels of lifeguard
readiness, and other means.’’ The USLA
commented that, since 1980, it has
maintained the position that lifeguards
serving at natural environments,
whether surf or non-surf beaches,
should be at least 16 years of age. The
USLA further commented that this
position was also reached by
participants at a national conference
held in 1980 which issued a report
entitled ‘‘Guidelines for Establishing
Open-Water Recreational Beach
Standards.’’ Participants included
representatives of the American
Camping Association, Red Cross,
National Safety Council, YMCA of the
USA, Council for National Cooperation
in Aquatics, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard, Boy
Scouts of America, the National Park
Service, several major municipal
lifeguard agencies from throughout the
USA, and several medical experts. The
USLA noted that the participants at this
conference, which used a consensusbased process to issue its
recommendations, considered such
factors as the physical and cultural
parameters of the natural environments
to be guarded; the psychological and
physiological stresses of public safety
employment; the lack of physical
stamina, maturity, and experience of
those under 16 years of age; and the
varying levels of supervision provided
young lifeguards. The USLA
summarized its comments by stating
‘‘people under the age of 16 should not
be permitted to work as lifeguards at
natural environments.’’ It also
commented that it found it difficult to
construct reasons that differentiate the
natural environment from the pool
environment, given that many of the
reasons for establishing a minimum age
of 16 years for employment as a
lifeguard at a natural environment
facility are equally applicable at
traditional pools.
The YWN and the CLC opposed this
proposal and both, apparently, support
the comments submitted by the USLA,
although this is not clear. The YWN
referred to comments of the US
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Lifeguarding Association and the CLC
referred to comments of the Lifeguard
Standards Association. The Department
has not been contacted by any
organizations using those names in
regards to this proposal.
The YWN also stated that work as a
lifeguard may entail exposure to
combative individuals, bloodborne
pathogens, and chemicals. It added that,
for these reasons, other organizations
like the YMCA do not certify lifeguards
until age 16 and thus ‘‘DOL’s argument
that this proposal ties DOL enforcement
practice to ‘standards’ in the industry is
not accurate.’’ The YWN also questioned
the justification for adding a new and
unique age cut-off for this one particular
job, when all other regulations group 15year-olds with 14-year-olds.
The CLC stated that ‘‘most distressing
is the fact that DOL gives no indication
of what the Red Cross training requires.’’
It also commented that the fact that DOL
would require the lifeguards to be
certified by the Red Cross (or a similar
certifying organization) in aquatics and
water safety ‘‘in no way assures that the
DOL proposal is prudent.’’
The World Waterpark Association
(WWA) supported the proposal to
permit the employment of 15-year-olds
as lifeguards at traditional swimming
pools and water amusement parks, but
opposed that portion of the proposal
that would prohibit such youth from
working as dispatchers or attendants at
the top of elevated water slides. The
WWA opined that ‘‘[it] is a universally
accepted position of the aquatic
community that a lifeguard’s first
responsibility is to prevent accidents
and injuries by enforcing rules and
educating patrons * * *. Therefore, 15year-olds working at the tops of
waterslides are fulfilling one of the core
duties of properly trained lifeguards, in
a manner which places them at the least
possible risk.’’ The WWA also disagreed
with the Department’s position that
working as a dispatcher or attendant at
the top of an elevated water slide
constitutes tending of power-driven
machinery under the provisions of Reg.
3 where there are no mechanized
conveyance systems or emergency ride
controls at the top.
A representative of Morey’s Pier of
Wildwood, New Jersey, whose
comments were submitted by the
IAAPA, supported the proposal to allow
the employment of 15-year-olds as
lifeguards at traditional swimming pools
and water amusement parks. She also
addressed the position of water slide
dispatcher, stating ‘‘we see no reason or
evidence that this is a dangerous job
that should be restricted.’’ She also
opined that such dispatchers are not in
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28419
contact with any power-driven
machinery.
A representative of the Pleasant Hill
Recreation and Park District (Pleasant
Hill) of Pleasant Hill, California,
expressed concern about how this
proposal would affect youth who
volunteer in her District’s ‘‘junior
lifeguard program.’’ After reviewing the
list of permitted lifeguard duties
presented in § 570.34(l)(2), she noted
that her facility has ‘‘swim instructors
who are certified by the American Red
Cross as Water Safety Instructors, but
are not lifeguard certified.’’ Her facility
has ‘‘cashiers who are not lifeguard
certified, but who help maintain order/
cleanliness in the pool area (deck,
locker rooms, crowd control during
emergency, etc.). She questioned
whether such employees, who are not
employed as lifeguards, must be at least
16 years of age or be 15 years of age with
proper lifeguard certification.
The representative of Pleasant Hill
also noted that youth aged 11 to 14
years of age participate in her facility’s
junior lifeguard program. The
participants attend 8 hours of training,
which follows the Red Cross’s Guard
Start Program, and then volunteer at the
pool as aides during swim lessons.
Participating youths are assigned to
assist an instructor, are never left alone
to teach a class, and also help during
recreational swims ‘‘by checking in/out
patrons bags/apparel/belongings.’’ She
noted that the junior lifeguard program
is an important tool for recruiting and
developing future lifeguards.
The Department has carefully
considered all the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal as
written, with two modifications. The
Department appreciates the concerns
raised by the Red Cross that certified
lifeguards may not have received the
proper training, and therefore the proper
certification, to give swimming
instruction. This same issue was
mentioned by Pleasant Hill, which
noted that it had swimming instructors
who were properly certified by the Red
Cross but were not certified as
lifeguards. In order to address the
concerns of the Red Cross, ensure the
maximum possible safety for young
workers and their charges who are
learning to swim, and eliminate
confusion, the Department is modifying
the language in the proposed
§ 570.34(l)(2) to reflect that 15-year-olds
may be employed as swimming
instructors only when they have been
certified to perform both lifeguard and
swimming instruction by the Red Cross
or some other recognized certifying
organization. This requirement for dual
certification, like the other lifeguard
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28420
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
requirements contained in Reg. 3, will
end when the minor reaches his or her
16th birthday.
The Department received an inquiry
after the publication of the NPRM
asking why ponds and quarries, places
where swimming often occurs, were not
specifically listed as natural
environment swimming facilities in
§ 570.34(l)(2) where the term traditional
swimming pool is defined. In order to
clarify the Final Rule, the Department
has decided to add ponds and quarries
to the non-exhaustive list of examples of
natural environment swimming
facilities that currently includes rivers,
streams, lakes, reservoirs, wharfs, piers,
canals, and oceanside beaches.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of the YWN, CLC, and USLA
about lowering the employment age for
lifeguards at traditional swimming pools
and certain water amusement park
facilities to 15, but believes that such
safeguards as proper certification in
aquatics and water safety by a
recognized certification organization,
the prohibition against tending powerdriven machinery which prevents 15year-olds from working as dispatchers
or attendants at the top of elevated
water slides, the OSHA standards
addressing potential exposures to
bloodborne pathogens and chemicals,
and the hours and times of day
standards established by § 570.35
combine to provide adequate
protections to these young workers. The
Department does not share the YWN’s
concerns about adding ‘‘a new and
unique age cut-off for this one particular
job, when all other regulations group 15year-olds with 14-year-olds.’’ The
Department notes that when rules are
clearly written and adequately
explained, public understanding and
compliance follow. This was evidenced
by the revisions to HO 2 published on
December 16, 2004 (see 69 FR 75382,
see also § 570.52(b)) necessitated by the
enactment of FLSA section 13(c)(6),
which permits limited on-the-job
driving by 17-year-olds under certain
conditions, but not by 16-year-olds.
The Department does not agree with
the CLC’s comment that the DOL gives
no indication of what Red Cross training
requires and the YWN’s comment that
this proposal is not ‘‘tied to standards in
the industry.’’ The Red Cross, just like
other nationally recognized certifying
organizations, spends a great deal of
time and effort formulating, refining,
disseminating, and publicizing the
elements and standards of its lifeguard
certification program. It is difficult to
argue that the Red Cross is not the
‘‘industry standard’’ when it estimates
that about 90% of all lifeguards in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
USA have received training through its
lifeguard training program.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of certain commenters that 15year-olds should be permitted to be
employed as dispatchers or attendants
at the top of elevated water slides, but
believes that continuation of its longheld position that such employment
constitutes the prohibited tending of
power-driven equipment—just as it is
for attendants on roller coasters, merrygo-rounds, and ski-lifts—is both prudent
and proper.
Finally, the Department acknowledges
the concerns of Pleasant Hill which
raised the issue of ‘‘junior lifeguard
programs’’ and the ‘‘volunteer’’
participation of youths between the ages
of 11 and 14 in such endeavors. The
Department notes that when such
programs do not involve an employeremployee relationship, they fall outside
the provisions of the FLSA. But when it
is determined that an employeremployee relationship does exist, and
the employee is engaged in work that is
subject to the FLSA, the minimum age
for such employment at a traditional
swimming pool would be 14. Such 14year-old employees could not be
employed as lifeguards or swim
instructors, but could perform such
tasks as maintaining the cleanliness of
the pool area and locker rooms, signing
in and signing out patrons, and
checking in and out such items as
towels, watches, and apparel. Such
youth would not be permitted to
perform any of the core functions of a
lifeguard nor be employed in a situation
where their employers could reasonably
expect them to rescue swimmers in
danger of drowning. Under this Final
Rule, properly certified 15-year-olds
could be employed at such pools as
lifeguards.
3. The Employment of Certain Youth by
Places of Business Where Machinery Is
Used To Process Wood Products
The provisions of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2004, amended the
FLSA by creating a limited exemption
from the child labor provisions for
certain minors 14 through 17 years of
age who are excused from compulsory
school attendance beyond the eighth
grade. The exemption, contained at
section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA, allows
eligible youth to work inside and
outside of places of businesses that use
machinery to process wood products,
subject to specified limitations. The
Department is incorporating the new
requirements of this amendment into its
regulations. The Department proposed
to incorporate the amendment into Reg.
3 at § 570.34(m), and into § 570.54,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Logging occupations and occupations in
the operation of any sawmill, lath mill,
shingle mill, or cooperage stock mill
(Order 4).
Section 13(c)(7) overrides the
heretofore complete prohibition on the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in
manufacturing occupations contained in
section 3(l) of the FLSA. Accordingly, to
meet the requirements of this
legislation, the Department proposed to
revise Reg. 3 to permit the employment
of qualifying 14- and 15-year-olds inside
and outside of places of business where
manufacturing (the processing of wood
products by machinery) takes place,
subject to specified conditions and
limitations.
The Department proposed to limit the
types of employers that may employ
such minors, as well as the worksites at
which such minors may be employed, to
those contemplated by the language of
the statute and mentioned by the
sponsors of the legislation and the
interested parties that testified at the
hearings held by Congress prior to the
enactment of the legislation (see, e.g.,
Testimony Before Senate Labor, Health
and Human Services, and Education
Subcommittee of the Committee on
Appropriations, The Employment Needs
of Amish Youth, 107th Cong. 2 (2001)).
The term places of business where
machinery is used to process wood
products shall mean such permanent
workplaces as sawmills, lath mills,
shingle mills, cooperage stock mills,
furniture and cabinet making shops,
gazebo and shed making shops, toy
manufacturing shops, and pallet shops.
The term shall not include construction
sites, portable sawmills, areas where
logging is being performed, or mining
operations. The term inside or outside
places of business refers to the distinct
physical place of the business, i.e., the
buildings and the immediate grounds
necessary for the operation of the
business. This exemption would not
apply to tasks performed at locations
other than inside or outside the place of
business of the employer such as the
delivery of items to customers or the
installation of items at customers’
establishments or residences.
Although section 13(c)(7) permits the
employment of certain youth inside and
outside of places of business where
machinery is used to process wood
products, it does so only if the youth do
not operate or assist in the operation of
power-driven woodworking machines.
The occupations of operating or
assisting in the operation of and the
term power-driven woodworking
machines are well-established in the
regulations, including in § 570.55. The
Department proposed to revise Reg. 3 to
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
include definitions of these terms along
with the specific prohibition against
operating or assisting in the operation of
power-driven woodworking machines.
Section 570.55 lists, when discussing
the prohibited occupations involved in
the operation of power-driven
woodworking machines, such activities
as supervising or controlling the
operation of the machines, feeding
materials into such machines, and
helping the operator feed material into
such machines. The list also includes
the occupations of setting up, adjusting,
repairing, oiling, or cleaning the
machines. That same section defines
power-driven woodworking machines to
mean all fixed or portable machines or
tools driven by power and used or
designed for cutting, shaping, forming,
surfacing, nailing, stapling, wire
stitching, fastening, or otherwise
assembling, pressing, or printing wood
or veneer. The Department proposed to
amend the definition of power-driven
woodworking machines to include those
machines that process trees, logs, and
lumber in recognition that section
13(c)(7) now permits certain youth 14
through 17 years of age to work in such
places of business as sawmills, lath
mills, and shingle mills where trees,
logs, and lumber would be processed.
Expanding this definition thus clarifies
that youth are prohibited from operating
or assisting in the operation of woodprocessing machinery typically found in
the workplaces covered by the 2004
amendment. This revised definition of
power-driven woodworking machines
would be included in § 570.34(m) of
Reg. 3 and both § 570.54 (HO 4) and
§ 570.55 (HO 5).
The limited exemption contained in
section 13(c)(7) applies only to certain
youth—new entrants into the
workforce—and only when certain
additional criteria are met. Section
13(c)(7) defines a new entrant into the
workforce as an individual who is under
the age of 18 and at least the age of 14,
and, by statute or judicial order, is
exempt from compulsory school
attendance beyond the eighth grade.
In addition, in order to be employed
inside or outside of places of business
where machinery is used to process
wood products, the new entrant must be
supervised by an adult relative or an
adult member of the same religious sect
or division as the entrant. The term
supervised refers to the requirement that
the youth’s on-the-job activities be
directed, monitored, overseen, and
controlled by a specified named adult.
Although the statute does not define the
terms adult and relative, the Department
proposed that, for purpose of this
exemption, a relative would include a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
parent (or person standing in place of a
parent), a grandparent, an aunt, an
uncle, and a sibling; and an adult would
be someone who has reached his or her
eighteenth birthday. The Department
also proposed that the term adult
member of the same religious sect or
division as the youth would mean an
adult who professes membership in the
same religious sect or division to which
the youth professes membership. The
Department believes that in order to
ensure these youth receive the degree of
protection from injury Congress
intended, the supervision of the minors
must be close, direct, and
uninterrupted. It is important to note
that this requirement of close, direct,
and uninterrupted supervision, just like
the requirement that youth not operate
or assist in the operation of powerdriven woodworking machinery, applies
to the employment of 16- and 17-yearolds as well as 14- and 15-year-olds.
Furthermore, section 13(c)(7) permits
the employment of a new entrant inside
or outside places of business where
machinery is used to process wood
products only if the youth is protected
from wood particles or other flying
debris within the workplace by a barrier
appropriate to the potential hazard of
such wood particles or flying debris or
by maintaining a sufficient distance
from machinery in operation, and is
required to use personal protective
equipment to prevent exposure to
excessive levels of noise and saw dust.
It is the Department’s position that
section 13(c)(7)’s prerequisite that the
youth is ‘‘required to use personal
protective equipment to prevent
exposure to excessive levels of noise
and saw dust’’ includes the youth’s
actual use of such equipment and not
just the employer’s obligation to
mandate such use.
The Wage and Hour Division has
consulted with representatives of the
Department’s Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) and will
defer to that agency’s expertise and
guidance when determining whether an
employer is in compliance with the
safety provisions of this exemption—
i.e., whether a workplace barrier is
appropriate to the potential hazard,
whether a sufficient distance has been
maintained from machinery in
operation, and whether the youth is
exposed to excessive levels of noise and
saw dust. The Department proposed that
compliance with the safety and health
provisions discussed in the previous
paragraph will be accomplished when
the employer is in compliance with the
requirements of the applicable
governing standards issued by OSHA or,
in those areas where OSHA has
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28421
authorized the state to operate its own
Occupational Safety and Health Plan,
the applicable standards issued by the
Office charged with administering the
State Occupational Safety and Health
Plan.
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. Although
both the YWN and CLC stated that they
did not support enactment of FLSA
section 13(c)(7), they strongly supported
the Department’s efforts to ensure that
the regulations provide adequate
protections for youths who are now
permitted to be employed inside and
outside places of business where
machinery is used to process wood
products. Both of these commenters,
along with the AFL–CIO, made
additional recommendations to the
proposal.
Both the YWN and the AFL–CIO
recommended that the Department add
a requirement to the revised
§ 570.34(m)(1) that all youth who come
within the exemption provided by FLSA
section 13(c)(7) must receive safety
training or certification for the specific
activities allowed under the proposal.
The CLC labeled as a ‘‘wise approach’’
the Department’s proposal to rely on the
expertise of OSHA, or the Office
charged with administering an OSHAauthorized state plan where appropriate,
to determine if employers are complying
with certain of the safety standards
established by FLSA section 13(c)(7). As
an outgrowth of this proposal, it stated
that ‘‘it would make sense either for the
Wage and Hour Division to enforce
OSHA in this context by issuing OSHA
citations that assert OSHA violations, or
for the Wage and Hour Division
investigator to notify OSHA of an OSHA
violation and direct OSHA to investigate
the matter as well for OSHA violations.
The reason for this recommendation
that the CLC makes here is that if there
are OSHA violations that give rise to
child labor violations, then the adults
who work with the woodworking
machinery are subject to the same
workplace hazards as the children.’’
The CLC commented that the
Department’s proposal that the
supervision received by young workers
employed under the provisions of FLSA
section 13(c)(7) be close, direct,
constant, and uninterrupted is essential
in view of the serious hazards that such
youth will face. The CLC recommended
that the proposal should also require
that the supervision be ‘‘one-on-one’’
and that the supervisors of the young
workers should be required to have
experience within the wood processing
industry or that workplace.
The CLC also expressed concern that
neither the statute nor the proposal
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28422
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
addresses the potential exposure of
young workers to ‘‘the toxic chemicals
present in adhesives and coating agents
that are used in woodworking
operations.’’ The CLC noted that many
of these chemicals pose risks of both
short-term and long-term effects on the
human body and also are extremely
flammable, and hence pose significant
fire and explosion hazards. CLC stated
‘‘DOL’s OSHA experts are familiar with
these hazards.’’
Finally, the CLC noted that the statute
did not require woodworking
establishments that employ youth under
the provisions of FLSA section 13(c)(7)
to report all work-related accidents and
deaths of such workers to the
Department. The CLC stated that even in
the absence of such a reporting
requirement, the Department can play
an important role by publicizing not
only the hazards of working in such
places of business, but also the results
of any child labor investigations
involving woodworking machines. The
CLC believed that such publicizing will
remind all American youth, their
parents, and their employers ‘‘of the
grave dangers that these machines
represent to working children.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments of the YWN,
AFL–CIO, and CLC. It has decided to
adopt the proposal as written, with one
clarifying modification.
Since the enactment of FLSA section
13(c)(7) on January 23, 2004, the
Department’s enforcement position has
been that the employment of 14- and 15year-olds employed under the
provisions of that section must still be
in compliance with all other provisions
of Reg. 3, including the hours and time
of day standards of § 570.35. Although
this is evidenced by the Department’s
compliance and enforcement guidance
and the structure of the NPRM, it was
not explicitly stated in the proposed
rule. The Department received an
inquiry on this issue after the
publication of the proposal. In order to
prevent any possible confusion and to
provide maximum clarity, the
Department has revised the Final Rule
by adding the following sentence to the
end of § 570.34(m)(2): The employment
of youth under this section must comply
with the other sections of this subpart,
including the hours and time of day
standards established by § 570.35.
The Department appreciates the
support and concerns of the
commenters. The Department believes
that the youths who will be employed
under the provisions of FLSA section
13(c)(7) will receive significant
workplace protections from the statute
and these resulting regulations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Requiring pre-employment certification
or training of youth was not envisioned
by Congress, especially for a population
of young workers whose formal
education ends at such an early age. The
Department also believes that the CLC
recommendations that the ratio of
supervisors to young workers should be
one-to-one and that all adults
supervising have experience in the
workplace or the industry were not
contemplated by Congress and would be
viewed as excessive. Similarly, the
Department believes that the CLC
recommendation regarding the
mandatory reporting of work-related
injuries and deaths that might occur to
youth employed under the provisions of
FLSA section 13(c)(7) would be
duplicative of the reporting
requirements already established by
OSHA.
The Department has long recognized
the importance of, and the benefits
resulting from, OSHA and WHD
working together to share enforcement
expertise and information, and to
leverage compliance assistance
initiatives. As recognized by the CLC,
these two agencies have a long and
productive history of partnering for the
benefit of American workers and those
who employ them. It is the
Department’s intention that this
relationship will continue to grow and
accommodate additional partnering
opportunities as they arise. As stated in
the Final Rule, WHD will continue to
rely on OSHA’s expertise for guidance
when applying the specific occupational
health and safety-affecting requirements
of FLSA section 13(c)(7) (see
§ 570.34(m)(1)(iii) and (iv)) as well as
when assessing the risks from potential
exposures to toxic chemicals; but WHD
will not itself issue citations for
violations of OSHA standards. As the
CLC stated, ‘‘DOL’s OSHA experts are
familiar with these hazards.’’
Finally, the Department is well aware
of the importance of keeping all
stakeholders informed of its compliance
assistance initiatives and enforcement
findings, and of serious occupational
injuries involving youth. WHD, OSHA,
and NIOSH have, for many years, shared
information among themselves
concerning occupational injuries that
have contributed to the deaths of young
workers as soon as one of the parties
learned of the death. WHD, OSHA, and
NIOSH then work together to ensure
that the appropriate rules are followed
and enforced and to learn from each
event in the hopes that future tragedies
can be prevented. This cooperation will
continue after the adoption of the Final
Rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
C. Periods and Conditions of
Employment (29 CFR 570.35)
FLSA section 3(l) authorizes the
Secretary of Labor to provide by
regulation for the employment of young
workers 14 and 15 years of age in
suitable nonagricultural occupations
and during periods and under
conditions that will not interfere with
their schooling or with their health and
well-being. In enacting FLSA section
3(l), Congress intended to assure the
health and educational opportunities of
14- and 15-year-olds, while allowing
them limited employment
opportunities.
Reg. 3 was promulgated in 1939 under
the direction of the Chief of the
Children’s Bureau, in whom Congress
vested the original delegation of
authority to issue child labor
regulations. The record on which Reg. 3
was based included hearings where
advocates of children expressed concern
over the need for children to avoid
fatigue, so as not to deplete the energy
required for their school work.
Similarly, witnesses stressed that early
morning and late evening work hours,
which interfered with sleep and often
fostered exhaustion, were unhealthful
for children and also diminished the
time that children should have spent
with the family (see In the Matter of
Proposed Regulation Relating to the
Employment of Minors Between 14 and
16 Years of Age Under the Fair Labor
Standards Act, Official Report of the
Proceedings Before the Children’s
Bureau, February 15, 1939, at 19, 21, 34,
82). Reg. 3 limits the hours that 14- and
15-year-olds may work to:
(1) Outside school hours;
(2) Not more than 40 hours in any 1
week when school is not in session;
(3) Not more than 18 hours in any 1
week when school is in session;
(4) Not more than 8 hours in any 1
day when school is not in session;
(5) Not more than 3 hours in any 1
day when school is in session; and
(6) Between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. in any
1 day, except during the summer (June
1 through Labor Day) when the evening
hour will be 9 p.m.
The Department did not propose to
change any of these hours and time-ofday limitations, but wished to foster
both understanding of, and compliance
with, these provisions by incorporating
into the regulations certain longstanding Departmental enforcement
positions and interpretations. For
example, the Department has developed
long-standing enforcement positions
regarding the application of certain of
the hours standards limitations to
minors who, for differing reasons, no
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
longer attend or are unable to attend
school. Some of these positions have
been in place since the 1970s and all
have been detailed in the Wage and
Hour Division’s Field Operations
Handbook since 1993. The Department
proposed to incorporate them into Reg.
3 to promote both clarity and
compliance. The Department proposed
to amend § 570.35 to reflect that school
would not be considered to be in
session for a 14- or 15-year-old minor
who has graduated from high school; or
has been excused from compulsory
school attendance by the state or other
jurisdiction once he or she has
completed the eighth grade and his or
her employment complies with all the
requirements of the state school
attendance law; or has a child to
support and appropriate state officers,
pursuant to state law, have waived
school attendance requirements for this
minor; or is subject to an order of a state
or federal court prohibiting him or her
from attending school; or has been
permanently expelled from the local
public school he or she would normally
attend. Such minors would be exempt
from the ‘‘when school is in session’’
hours standards limitations contained in
§§ 570.35(a)(1), (a)(3) and (a)(5). The
employment of such minors would still
be governed by the remaining
provisions of Reg. 3, including the daily,
weekly, morning, and evening hours
standards limitations contained in
§§ 570.35(a)(2), (a)(4), and (a)(6).
The Department also proposed to
clarify the hours restriction contained in
§ 570.35(a)(5), which limits the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in
nonagricultural employment to no more
than 3 hours on a day when school is
in session, by adding a statement that
this restriction also applies to Fridays.
The WHD occasionally receives requests
for clarification from employers seeking
to lengthen the work shifts of younger
employees on nights that do not precede
a school day. As the stated purposes of
the hours standards limitations include
the protection of young workers from
exhaustion and the preservation of time
for rest and family relations, no more
than 3 hours of work is permitted on
any day when school is in session.
The Department also proposed to
incorporate into Reg. 3 its long-standing
position that the term week as used in
Reg. 3 means a standard calendar week
of 12:01 a.m. Sunday through midnight
Saturday, not an employer’s workweek
as defined in 29 CFR 778.105. The
calendar week would continue to serve
as the timeframe for determining
whether a minor worked in excess of 18
hours during any week when school
was in session or in excess of 40 hours
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:36 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
in any week when school was not in
session.
Finally, as noted above, Reg. 3 limits
the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds
to periods that are outside of school
hours and to designated hours
depending upon whether or not school
is in session. Although neither the FLSA
nor Reg. 3 defines the terms school
hours and school is in session as they
apply to nonagricultural employment,
the Department has developed and
applied a long-standing enforcement
position that these terms refer to the
normal hours of the public school
system in the child’s district of
residence. This enforcement position
mirrors the provisions of FLSA section
13(c)(1), which Congress added in 1949,
to clarify how these terms apply to the
employment of youth in agricultural
employment. FLSA section 13(c)(1)
states, in relevant part: ‘‘The provisions
of section 212 of this title relating to
child labor shall not apply to any
employee employed in agriculture
outside of school hours for the school
district where such employee is living
while he is so employed, if such
employee * * *. (C) is fourteen years of
age or older.’’
Though the Department did not
propose specific regulatory language
regarding these terms when it published
the NPRM, it did seek information from
the public regarding whether such
regulatory provisions would be
appropriate, including whether: (1) The
Department should continue to use the
hours of operation of the local public
school where a minor resides to
determine when he or she may legally
be employed, even when that minor
does not attend that local public school
or, for whatever reason, may actually
have attendance requirements that differ
from those of the rest of the students
attending that local school; (2) the
FLSA’s requirement that such a minor
only be employed under conditions and
during periods that will not interfere
with his or her schooling or health and
well-being would be equally or better
served if it were based on the minor’s
own actual academic schedule; and (3)
using the academic schedule and
attendance requirements of each minor
when determining when school was in
session for that minor would provide
working youths greater opportunities
and flexibility when seeking safe,
positive and legal employment. The
Department stated that, based on the
comments it received, it would consider
adding regulatory provisions to the
Final Rule defining the terms school
hours and school is in session as they
apply to nonagricultural employment.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28423
The Department received nine
comments on this proposal. Two
commenters, the YWN and the CLC,
addressed the proposal to incorporate
into § 570.35 certain long-standing
departmental enforcement positions
regarding the application of the hours
standards. Both supported the
Department’s enforcement positions that
school should not be considered in
session for a 14- or 15-year-old youth
who has graduated from high school;
has been excused from compulsory
school attendance by the state or other
jurisdiction once he or she has
completed the eighth grade and his or
her employment complies with all the
provisions of the state school attendance
law; or is subject to an order prohibiting
him or her from attending school.
Although the YWN supported the
proposals that school should also not be
considered in session for a youth who
(1) has a child to support and
appropriate state officers, pursuant to
state law, have waived school
attendance requirements for that minor,
or (2) has been permanently expelled
from the local public school he or she
would normally attend, the CLC did not.
The CLC stated that it believes it is ‘‘illadvised to excuse 14- and 15-year-olds
from compulsory school attendance on
the basis of parental status. It serves the
best interests of the 14- and 15-year-old
parent, as well as the young parent’s
child, for the parent to complete his or
her education, thus realizing a long-term
benefit of increased and better
employment in the future.’’ The CLC
stated that a child permanently expelled
from public school might still be
required, under state or local law or
perhaps court order, to attend some
other school. The CLC recommended
that the Department amend its proposed
revision to read ‘‘Has been permanently
expelled from the local public school he
or she would normally attend, unless
the child is required, by state or local
law or ordinance, or by court order, to
attend another school.’’
Only the YWN and CLC commented
on the Department’s proposal to clarify
the Reg. 3 limitation that 14- and 15year-olds may not be employed to work
more than three hours on any one day
when school is in session by adding the
phrase ‘‘including Fridays.’’ Both the
YWN and the CLC supported this
proposal. The representative of White
Hat recommended that participants in
programs similar to those of the charter
schools he advises should be permitted
to work up to five hours on a school
day.
The Department received six
comments that addressed its proposal to
incorporate into Reg. 3 its long-standing
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28424
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
position that the term ‘‘week’’ as used in
Reg. 3 means a standard calendar week
of 12:01 a.m. Sunday through midnight
Saturday, not an employer’s workweek
as defined in 29 CFR 778.105. The
proposal stated that the calendar week
would continue to serve as the
timeframe for determining whether a
minor worked in excess of 18 hours
during any week when school was in
session or in excess of 40 hours in any
week when school was not in session.
Both the YWN and CLC supported
this proposal. Four commenters, the
Food Marketing Institute (FMI), Six
Flags, the WWA, and the representative
of Morey’s Pier, opposed the proposal.
The FMI described itself as a conductor
of ‘‘programs in research, education,
industry relations and public affairs on
behalf of its 1,500 member companies—
food retailers and wholesalers—in the
United States and around the world.’’
The FMI reported that its retail
membership is composed of large multistore chains, regional firms and
independent supermarkets. The FMI
stated ‘‘[w]e strongly object to this
change, which would create an
administrative nightmare, and see no
reason for it.’’ The FMI commented that
most of its members already have
systems in place based on their own
workweeks that automatically check
hours worked to make sure minors do
not exceed their allowable hours. ‘‘By
requiring the use of a Sunday to
Saturday midnight week, employers
would be forced to check hours worked
manually, making it more likely that
mistakes would be made.’’
The WWA echoed the concerns of the
FMI and asked that the proposed rule be
amended to allow employers to
calculate hours worked so that Saturday
and Sunday hours may be included
within the same workweek. Six Flags
expressed the same concern regarding
its ability to use its payroll tracking
system as a compliance tool and
recommended that the Department
allow employers to use any reasonable
system such as labor tracking and
payroll monitoring tools that
complement their record keeping
systems. The representative of Morey’s
Pier recommended that the term
workweek should be defined, but not
necessarily by the calendar.
The Department received six
comments on its enforcement position
that defines the term school in session
as applying to the normal hours of the
public school system in the minor
employee’s district of residence. The
YWN and the CLC supported using the
hours of the local public school district
the minor would attend if he or she
attended public school when defining
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
the term school in session. The YWN
praised the enforcement benefits that
would arise from having only one
standard in each school district, thereby
avoiding multiple schedules that would
create unworkable and needlessly
complex enforcement standards. The
YWN also suggested that the
Department should clearly state in the
Final Rule that school is considered to
be in session during any week in which
school attendance is required for one or
more days. The CLC commented that
‘‘[if] the school day schedules
established by private schools and by
parents of home-schooled children
could determine when children being
educated in those settings governed
here, there would be nothing in the DOL
child labor regulations that would
prevent such a school or parent from
setting a schedule that would permit
children to work during the hours that
the public school system is in session.
Indeed, non-public schools could be
established by organizations whose
prime goal is to provide 14- and 15-yearold working children to employers
during normal business hours in the
middle of the day, rather than to make
sure that the children are in school
during the hours when they are most
alert and receptive to classroom
instruction. We do not say that there
would be many such schools or homeschooling parents, but the mere fact that
such outcomes could occur should be
reason enough to cause DOL to reject
this approach.’’ The CLC, when
commenting on the Department’s
inquiry regarding whether employers of
working youth should be given greater
flexibility, stated ‘‘[t]here is no need for
DOL to bend over backwards to try to
assure that children have the absolute
maximum opportunity to squeeze every
possible minute of the day into the three
hours that they can work during a
school day. This approach seems to us
to give far more emphasis to work
experiences for 14- and 15-year-olds
than to their education.’’
The National Council of Chain
Restaurants (Council), the representative
of Morey’s Pier, and the FMI supported
defining the term school in session by
following the academic schedule and
attendance requirements of each minor,
rather than that of the local public
school. The Council noted that
frequently ‘‘the academic schedule and
attendance requirements followed by
public schools do differ, sometimes
significantly, from the schedule
followed by private schools. By
applying each minor’s actual school
schedule, rather than arbitrarily
applying the local public school
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
schedule, job opportunities would be
expanded for minors subject to Child
Labor Reg. 3 without adversely
impacting the school work of such
minors.’’ The FMI stated that adopting
the hours of the local public school
when defining the term school is in
session would ‘‘make no sense’’ for the
many young people who do not go to
public schools. The FMI found it ‘‘hard
to understand why their work hours
should be governed by a school system
they have nothing to do with.’’ The
representative of Morey’s Pier believed
that each minor should be treated
individually and that his or her own
academic schedule and attendance
requirements should be used when
determining when school was in session
for the minor. Barring adoption of her
recommendation, she believed the
Department’s enforcement position to be
the ‘‘second best option.’’
The DOLWD did not oppose this
enforcement position but suggested that
an ‘‘exception’’ from the definition of
school is in session should be created
for youth enrolled in home school or
other alternative school programs based
on considerations of ‘‘whether the work
interferes with the individual’s
schooling, health or well being rather
than the hours of operation for public
schools.’’ The DOLWD also suggested
that the federal regulations on the
number of hours that 14- and 15-yearolds may work should be amended to be
consistent with the more permissive
standards established in Alaska. The
Council also recommended that the
Department expand the number of hours
that such youth may be employed to
four hours on any school day; to as late
as 8 p.m. on any evening between Labor
Day and May 31st; and as late as 10 p.m.
on any evening between June 1st and
Labor Day. The YWN recommended that
the Department eliminate the reference
to between June 1st and Labor Day and
replace it with the actual calendar of
each public school, noting that an
increasing number of school districts
have year-round schedules.
After carefully reviewing the
comments, the Department has decided
to continue its long-standing
enforcement position that school hours
are defined by the hours that the local
public school district where the minor
resides when employed is in session,
and to add this definition to § 570.35(b)
to avoid confusion and to simplify both
compliance and enforcement of the
hours standards of Reg. 3. The
Department has also included in this
definition the YWN’s recommended
clarifying statement that school should
be considered to be in session during
any week when school attendance is
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
required for any portion of a day. The
Department is also adding to that
section its long-standing position that
outside school hours means such
periods as before and after school hours,
holidays, summer vacations, weekends,
and any other day or part of a day when
the local public school district where
the minor resides while employed is not
in session. This section will also note
that summer school sessions, held in
addition to the regularly scheduled
school year, are considered to be outside
of school hours.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of the one employer and two
employer associations that
recommended that an employee’s own
academic schedule and individual
attendance requirements should be used
to determine when school is in session
for that minor and recognizes how such
a position could be seen as a means of
providing minors with more work
experiences while addressing employer
staffing problems. But the Department is
concerned that such a system may not
give the proper emphasis to obtaining
an education and would make employer
compliance and WHD enforcement
more difficult and more complicated
than necessary, given the broad variety
of daily school schedules that each
young employee could have.
The Department believes that the
continuation and incorporation of this
enforcement position brings clarity in
that employers need only look to the
hours of operation of the local public
school where the minor resides to attain
compliance. It also ensures that the
consistent application of these terms for
both agricultural and nonagricultural
employment will continue, thereby
avoiding confusion among those
employers who offer both agricultural
and nonagricultural employment to
young workers. Finally, continuation of
this enforcement position facilitates the
enforcement of the Reg. 3 hours
standards by establishing a single, easily
determinable standard.
The Department also believes that
continuation of this enforcement
position is appropriate as it does not
provide any minor or class of minors
with an incentive to leave public school
or with an unfair and improper
advantage over public school youth
when competing for employment. The
Department notes the CLC’s concerns
that determining when school is in
session by using each student’s
individual academic schedule could
foster the development of nonpublic
schools or home-schooling programs
created primarily to provide 14- and 15year-old working children to employers
during the hours they would normally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
have attended public school. While the
Department agrees with the CLC that it
is unlikely that many such schools or
home-schooling programs would
materialize, it does note that the
emergence of schools that were
designed to allow migrant children to
work on farms during the daylight hours
when the local public school was in
session, was an impetus for the 1949
amendment to the FLSA that codified
this very same enforcement position as
it relates to agricultural employment.
The Department has decided not to
incorporate into Reg. 3 its long-standing
enforcement position that a calendar
week—12:01 a.m. Sunday through
midnight Saturday—shall be the
framework for determining if a 14- or
15-year-old has been employed more
than 18 hours in any week when school
is in session or more than 40 hours in
any week when school is not is session.
The Department agrees with several
commenters who noted that applying
the same definition of the term week for
determining compliance with the
minimum wage, overtime, and child
labor provisions of the FLSA would
make it much easier for employers to
use their payroll systems as tools and
tracking systems for implementing and
maintaining compliance with the child
labor requirements. Accordingly, as
suggested by those commenters, the
Department will define the term week as
used in Reg. 3 to be the same workweek
the employer establishes for the youth
to determine overtime compensation
under 29 CFR 778.105—a fixed and
regularly recurring period of 168
hours—seven consecutive 24-hour
periods.
Finally, the Department acknowledges
the recommendations of the DOLWD,
the Council, and the representative of
White Hat regarding the relaxation of
certain of the hours and time of day
restrictions of Reg. 3 to permit 14- and
15-year-olds to work more hours on a
school day or in a school week, or later
into the evening. As noted in the NPRM,
the Department did not propose any
revisions to those standards. Any such
changes, therefore, would be outside the
scope of this rulemaking.
D. Work-Study Programs
Effective November 5, 1969, Reg. 3
was amended to provide a variance from
some of the provisions of § 570.35 for
the employment of minors 14 and 15
years of age enrolled in and employed
pursuant to a school-supervised and
administered Work Experience and
Career Exploration Program (WECEP).
Although originally proposed as an
experimental program, Reg. 3 was
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28425
amended to make the WECEP a
permanent exception.
WECEP was created to provide a
carefully planned work experience and
career exploration program for 14- and
15-year-old youth who can benefit from
a career-oriented educational program
designed especially to meet the
participants’ needs, interests, and
abilities. The program was, and
continues to be, specifically geared to
helping dropout-prone youth become
reoriented and motivated toward
education and to prepare for the world
of work. WECEPs may, however, be
tailored to meet the needs of other
students as well.
Section 570.35a establishes the
criteria that must be met in order for
states to apply for and receive
authorization to operate a WECEP. This
same section details the terms,
conditions, and responsibilities
participating states agree to assume
upon receiving authorization to operate
a WECEP.
As mentioned, certain provisions of
§ 570.35 relating to the Reg. 3 hours
standards are varied for youth enrolled
in and employed pursuant to an
approved WECEP. Such youth may
work up to 23 hours in any one week
when school is in session and not more
than 3 hours in any day when school is
in session, any portion of which may be
during school hours. The other
provisions of § 570.35 (limiting
employment to no more than 8 hours a
day on any one day school is not in
session, and no more than 40 hours in
any one week when school is not in
session) remain applicable to the
employment of WECEP participants.
Section 570.35a also includes
provisions that allow the Administrator
of the Wage and Hour Division
discretion to grant requests for special
variances from the occupation standards
established by §§ 570.33 and 570.34.
Several states have advised the
Department that WECEP serves its
targeted audience well, helping those
who are not academically oriented stay
in school and complete their high
school educations. However, WECEP, by
design, does little to help those students
who wish to use work experience, and
the wages such experiences generate, as
a means to realize their academic
potential and acquire a college
education.
In 2003, the Department became
aware of a non-profit network of private
schools, hereafter referred to as the
Network, that was operating a corporate
work-study program for its students.
The Network is an association of
private, not-for-profit college
preparatory high schools that strive to
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28426
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
meet the educational needs of people in
many economically challenged areas
throughout the country. The work-study
program was implemented to help
students offset the costs of a quality
college preparatory education and
develop important work experience and
socialization skills that will allow them
to assume leadership roles as adults.
Under the Network’s model, four
students share a single, full-time clerical
position with a private employer at a
work place screened and selected by the
school. Each youth works five full days
per four-week period for the employer at
the work place—one eight-hour day
once a week for three weeks, and two
eight-hour days every fourth week. The
academic schedules of the students are
carefully coordinated so that students
do not miss any classes on the days they
work and the school year has been
extended beyond the standard academic
schedule of the local public school to
compensate for the time the students
spend at work. These accommodations
ensure that students complete a fully
accredited, college preparatory
curriculum that exceeds both state and
accrediting agency requirements. Under
the Network model, students do not
work more than eight hours a day,
before 7 a.m. or after 7 p.m., and are
transported to and from their jobs by the
school. The students receive at least the
applicable federal and state minimum
wages, and applicable taxes are
withheld and reported by their
respective employers. The Network
envisioned the work-study program as
an integral part of the academic
program, yielding benefits on many
different levels. Students, their parents,
and the work-study director sign an
agreement defining performance
expectations and program support
structures. Participating employers are
also required to sign an agreement
defining job duties and expectations. All
students are required to participate in
the work-study program, beginning with
their freshman year and ending at
graduation.
The Network provided information
that its model is achieving its stated
aims. It advised the Department that 100
percent of the students of the 2003
graduating class of one of its schools
were accepted into college. The school
is located in a neighborhood where 20
percent of those attending the local
public school drop out annually and the
high school graduation rate of the local
public school is 55 percent.
Reg. 3, as currently written, does not
allow 14- and 15-year-olds to participate
in the Network’s work-study programs.
Such youth may not work during the
hours school is in session—unless
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
participating in a state sponsored
WECEP—and may not work more than
three hours on a day the local public
school is in session.
Because the Department believes that
the health, well-being, and educational
opportunities of 14- and 15-year-olds
who are academically oriented are not
placed at risk by participation in
structured work-study programs such as
the Network’s model—and are in fact
enhanced by such participation—it
proposed that Reg. 3 be revised to
accommodate such programs. The
Department proposed to allow public
and private school districts or systems
to apply to the Administrator of the
Wage and Hour Division for approval to
operate a work-study program that
would permit certain 14- and 15-yearolds to work during school hours and
up to eight hours on a school day under
specific circumstances. An individual
private school that was not part of a
network, district, or system would also
be able to apply to participate in a work
study program.
The youth would have to be enrolled
in a college preparatory curriculum and
must receive, every year they participate
in the work-study program, at least the
minimum number of hours of class
room instruction required by the
applicable state educational agency
responsible for establishing such
standards. Participating youth would
also be required to receive annual
classroom instruction in workplace
safety and child labor provisions. Homeschooled youth would be able to
participate in work-study programs
operated by local public schools in the
same manner many currently participate
in team sports programs, band, and
other extracurricular activities.
Each participating school would be
required to name a teacher-coordinator
to supervise the work-study program,
make regularly scheduled visits to the
students’ work sites, and ensure that
participants are employed in
compliance with the minimum wage
and child labor provisions of the FLSA.
In addition, the teacher-coordinator, the
employer and the student would be
required to sign a written participation
agreement that details the objectives of
the work-study program, describes the
specific job duties to be performed by
the student, and the number of hours
and times of day that the student would
be employed each week. The agreement,
which must also be signed or otherwise
consented to by the student’s parent or
guardian, would also affirm that the
student will receive the minimum
number of hours of class room
instruction as required by the state
educational agency for the completion
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of a fully-accredited college preparatory
curriculum and that the employment
will comply with the applicable child
labor and minimum wage provisions of
the FLSA.
Students participating in a valid
work-study program would be permitted
to work up to eighteen hours a week, a
portion of which may be during school
hours, in accordance with the following
formula that is based upon a continuous
four-week cycle. In three of the four
weeks, the participant would be
permitted to work during school hours
on only one day per week, and for no
more than eight hours on that day.
During the remaining week of the fourweek cycle, such minor would be
permitted to work during school hours
on no more than two days, and for no
more than eight hours on each of those
two days. The employment of such
minors would still be subject to the time
of day and number of hours standards
contained in § 570.35(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4),
and (a)(6).
The Department received eight
comments on this proposal. The Cristo
Rey Network, which described itself as
‘‘a non-profit corporation that coordinates twelve college prep high
schools across the country,’’ selfidentified itself as the Network that the
Department describes in the NPRM. The
Cristo Rey Network was most
supportive of the proposal and noted
that its work-study program meets the
statutory objective of permitting youth
employment only ‘‘during periods and
under conditions that will not interfere
with their schooling or health and well
being’’ as required by FLSA section 3(l).
Cristo Rey stated ‘‘[m]eeting those
objectives can be quantified in Cristo
Rey’s 97+% attendance rate and/or in its
graduates’ own achievements: i.e., of
219 graduates in 2006, 212 were
accepted into colleges including schools
such as the University of California at
Berkley, the University of Illinois, the
University of Notre Dame, the
University of Chicago, and Wellesley
College; and the success continues: of
318 graduates in 2007, 313 will attend
college this Fall.’’ Cristo Rey noted that
the schools in the Network provide an
option for private education to children
who are ‘‘predominantly Latino (63%) or
African-American (25%) and who are
all from economically-disadvantaged
families; the average family income of
these students is approximately
$33,000—far too little to make private
education an option absent the workstudy program that the schools in the
Network have pioneered.’’
The YWN disagreed with the
proposal, stating that § 570.35a already
includes provisions that allow the WHD
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to grant requests for special variances
from the occupation standards regarding
prohibited work, and that this should be
expanded to grant variances from the
Reg. 3 hours standards as well. The
YWN stated that this proposal benefits
one single program and makes the
regulations unnecessarily complex. It
also raises concerns that the ‘‘host
employer’’ might not be subject to the
same restrictions and requirements as
any other employer who hires youth
and that students may be replacing a
‘‘regular paid employee.’’
The CLC noted that it had several
serious concerns about this proposal. It
felt that the proposal was so narrowly
tailored to one specific program that it
could easily bar other school systems
‘‘that have similar, but not identical,
approaches’’ from taking advantage of
the program. The CLC stated that
‘‘[w]hat is particularly troubling—and
what DOL does not indicate in its
preamble to the proposed regulation—is
that the only school system that appears
to qualify for the proposed program is
a private Roman Catholic system.’’ The
CLC stated that ‘‘[t]he DOL proposal
raises serious questions under the First
Amendment to the United States
Constitution, which forbids the
government favoring one religious sect
over another.’’
The CLC also raised concerns as to
whether DOL would ‘‘be able to assure
that no violations occur under this
system’’ and of ‘‘the secrecy of the
approval process that DOL would
adopt.’’ The CLC believed that the
proposed approval process is not
sufficiently transparent and
recommended that DOL be required to
publish a notice in the Federal Register
detailing every work-study program
application and invite public comment
during a specified period of 30 or 60
days.
The CLC also noted that the proposal
would not prohibit an employer from
replacing a permanent worker at an
establishment participating in the workstudy program with student-workers, as
prohibited under the WECEP provisions
contained in § 570.35a(e). The CLC also
expressed concerns that the Cristo Rey
Network has been operating a workstudy program for almost a decade and
questioned how much of each youth’s
pay check goes to Cristo Rey and how
much, if any, goes to the youth. Finally,
the CLC also questioned, as did the
YWN, if the ‘‘host employers’’ or the
Cristo Rey High School would be
considered the actual employers of the
youth under the FLSA.
The Department received several
comments supporting the creation of a
work-study program that would allow
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
youth to work during the hours school
was in session, but opposing that such
a program be limited, as the Department
proposed, to students enrolled in a
college preparatory curriculum. The
DOLWD recommended that the program
should be expanded to include preapprenticeship work training programs,
and a representative of the New Jersey
Department of Education (NJDOE)
recommended that ‘‘determining the
educational and eligibility requirements
for such programs be left to state
education agencies.’’ The NJDOE also
stated that the Department’s proposal to
limit participation in the work-study
program ‘‘conflicts with the federal No
Child Left Behind Act, the federal Carl
D. Perkins Career and Technical
Education Act, the federal Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act, and
state laws and regulations, which
require state education agencies and
public schools to serve all students and
provide all students with
comprehensive career education,
including opportunities to further
explore careers in work-based learning
activities.’’
The representative of White Hat
supported the creation of a work-study
program but suggested that charter
schools of the type he represents should
not be subjected to the ‘‘bureaucratic
requirements’’ imposed by the workstudy application process proposed by
the Department, ‘‘which can be
prohibitive for some smaller schools
and which serve to take needed
resources away from educational
instruction and helping more students.’’
He also stated that limiting participation
in the proposed work-study program to
students enrolled in a college
preparatory curriculum ‘‘can also have
the unintended consequence of denying
extended work hours and compensation
from those who need it the most, the
undereducated.’’
A representative of the National
Association of State Directors of Career
Technical Education Consortium (State
Directors) apparently believed that the
adoption of the proposal contained in
§ 570.35b would preclude anyone but a
student enrolled in a college preparatory
curriculum from participating in any
work-study program in the future. He
stated ‘‘such a rule would cripple career
technical education (CTE) programs that
have work-based learning opportunities
embedded within the curriculum.’’ The
same assumption was made by a teacher
at the Sunrise Mountain High School in
Peoria, Arizona who commented
‘‘[t]hese internships provide our
students valuable hands-on experiences
to help connect school and careers in a
meaningful way. The RIN 1215–AB44
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28427
proposal would remove this valuable
learning experience from our students.’’
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to implement the proposal as
written with two minor modifications.
The first modification involves a
redesignation of the sections dealing
with both WECEP and the Work Study
Program as requested by the Federal
Register. The current § 570.35a will be
redesignated as § 570.36 and the
proposed § 570.35b will be issued as
§ 570.37. The second modification
clarifies the role of the teachercoordinator.
The Department wishes to emphasize
that this proposal creates a new, limited,
work-study program designed to
accommodate the needs of a narrowly
defined population—14- and 15-yearold students enrolled in a college
preparatory curriculum at a public or
private school that has been granted
authority to operate such a program by
the Department. This new program does
not in any way negate or preclude
schools or employers from participating
in other preexisting or future workstudy programs, work experience and/or
career exploration programs,
internships, or apprenticeships that also
comport with the provisions of the
FLSA (whether with the hours
standards and time of day restrictions in
§ 570.35 or the special WECEP rules in
§ 570.35a (old) and § 570.36 (new)). This
proposal was developed and offered
solely with the intent, as stated earlier
in this section, of providing reasonable
and structured accommodations within
Reg. 3 so that academically oriented 14and 15-year-olds could begin their
pursuit of college educations through
work-study programs. Participation in
the proposed work-study program is
voluntary and it in no way conflicts
with other federal, state, or local
programs addressing the educational
needs of young workers. The concerns
of the State Directors and the NJDOE are
unfounded.
The Department appreciates the
recommendations of several
commenters that the work-study
program should be extended to youth
enrolled in programs other than college
preparatory, such as vocational
programs, internships, and
apprenticeships. The Department notes
that the already existing WECEP (see
§ 570.36 (new)) would provide those
programs with limited exemptions from
the hours standards contained in
§ 570.35(a) that are similar to the
exemptions provided by the proposed
work-study program.
The Department also disagrees with
the YWN and CLC comments that the
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28428
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
proposed work-study program was
designed to accommodate a single
program—the Cristo Rey Network.
Although the Cristo Rey Network workstudy model was reviewed by the
Department, the proposed work-study
program differs considerably from that
model. The Department’s proposed
WSP, unlike the Cristo Rey model,
requires annual classroom instruction in
workplace safety and state and federal
child labor provisions and rules (see
§ 570.37(b)(3)(ii)), the oversight of a
designated teacher-coordinator required
to make visits to the students’
workplaces (see § 570.37(b)(3)(iii)), the
completion of a detailed written
participation agreement (see
§ 570.37(b)(3)(iv)), and a rigorous
certification process. The Department
believes that these additional
requirements, many of which
correspond to the criteria established for
operating a WECEP under § 570.36
(new), will provide adequate protections
to all students who participate in an
approved work-study program under the
provisions of § 570.37 (new). The
Department also believes that the
certification process as proposed by the
Department, which again is similar to
that required of WECEP applicants,
provides sufficient transparency
without requiring publication in the
Federal Register or public comment. In
addition, pursuant to the President’s
commitment to openness and
transparency,1 the Department intends
to publish the list of schools authorized
to operate a work-study program on the
WHD Web site.
The Department also notes that the
proposed work-study program provides
considerable flexibility to those schools
that choose to participate. The
limitations on the number of hours that
participating students may be employed
(see § 570.37(c) (new)), though in line
with those established by the Cristo Rey
Network, constitute the absolute
maximum number of hours that
participants may be employed.
Participating schools and employers
may choose to adopt some other
schedule of work hours that comport
with the established maxima—such as
one four-hour day or one six-hour day
each workweek; or two eight-hour days
each weekend; or three hours a day at
the end of each of three school days, as
long as those hours comply with end-ofday hours standards established by
§ 570.35(a)(6). In addition, a school
could apply and receive authorization
1 January 21, 2009 Memorandum for the Heads of
Executive Departments and Agencies, available at:
https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E91777.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
under § 570.37 (new) to operate a workstudy program for just one student, one
group of students, or, as in the case of
the Cristo Rey Network, the entire
student body.
The Department wishes to emphasize
that the development of this studentwork program was never intended to
advantage any single, private school
system, but was proposed for the benefit
of all academically motivated students
enrolled in college preparatory curricula
that can avail themselves of such a
program of employment that clearly
facilitates, rather than interferes with,
their schooling. The Department, for
this very reason, did not specifically
identify the Cristo Rey Network in the
NPRM. It did not want the public
mistakenly to believe that participation
in the proposed work-study program
would be limited to private schools,
public schools, or any particular
religious or nonreligious sect. For
similar reasons, the Department did not
identify the municipalities that inquired
about the employment of youth by state
and local governments and as
lifeguards, which led to the
Department’s enforcement positions on
those topics. Since publication of the
NPRM, the Department has received
inquiries from public schools and
private schools (not part of the Cristo
Rey Network) about establishing workstudy programs under § 570.37 (new).
The Department also wishes to assure
both the YWN and CLC that employers
participating in the work-study program
authorized by § 570.37 (new) would
indeed be the employer of the youth
under the FLSA and held to all the Act’s
minimum wage, overtime, record
keeping, and child labor provisions—
unless subject to a specific exemption or
exception—as would any other
employer. In fact, depending upon the
facts of each situation and the degree of
control the school exercises over the
employment of the participating
student, it is possible that the student
would be considered to be jointly
employed by the host-employer and the
youth’s school under the FLSA (see 29
CFR part 791). The FLSA would require
that students participating in the workstudy program, if covered by the Act
and not exempt from the minimum
wage requirements of section 6, receive
the applicable minimum wage for all
hours worked. Such students may, in
accordance with 29 CFR 531.40, make a
voluntary assignment of their wages to
a third party. The employment of
students participating in the work-study
program would also most likely be
subject to state wage requirements and
child labor provisions. When state and
federal requirements differ, the FLSA
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
does not supersede any more protective
state child labor requirement and
employers must normally comply with
the more stringent standard.
Under § 570.37 (new), the
participating school district and
employers share the burden of ensuring
that the employment of work-study
program participants is in compliance
with the FLSA. When the Department
conducts an investigation of a workstudy program participating employer, it
will follow its normal investigation
procedures to determine if the employer
complied with child labor requirements.
The employer will be held responsible
for any violations of the FLSA or the
child labor regulations. But the
Department considers it appropriate that
the school district sponsoring the workstudy assist the employer in the both
achieving and monitoring the
compliance of the work-study program.
Therefore, the Department has revised
the proposed regulatory language at
§ 570.37(b)(3)(iii) to emphasize the role
of the teacher-coordinator in confirming
that the employment of the work-study
program participant complies with the
child labor and minimum wage
requirements of the FLSA. In addition,
when a school system files a letter of
application to renew an existing workstudy program, it will be required to
note that the teacher-coordinator has
confirmed that the employment of
students in the work-study program has
been in compliance with the child labor
and minimum wage provisions of the
FLSA.
The Department believes that the
teacher-coordinator occupies an ideal
position to both help the employer
attain and maintain compliance with
the all the requirements of work-study
program and assist the Department’s
enforcement efforts by confirming that
compliance. In addition to the regularly
scheduled visits to the workplaces the
teacher-coordinator is required to make,
the Department suggests that such
things as frequent interactions with the
work-study program students, program
assessments and evaluations completed
by the students and the employers, and
surprise or unscheduled visits to the
workplaces can all contribute to the
operation of a safe, compliant, and
positive work-study program. The
suggested methods of confirmation are
purely discretionary; no work-study
participating school district will be
penalized for not adopting them. The
Department notes that it is not imposing
any recordkeeping burdens on the
employers or the school districts beyond
those proposed in the 2007 NPRM,
therefore no additional estimates of
costs or burdens will be incurred that
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
must be accounted for pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act and
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of both the YWN and the CLC
that the proposed work-study program,
unlike the WECEP, does not prohibit
participating employers from displacing
a worker already employed in the
employer’s establishment with a student
(see § 570.36(e) (new)). The
Department’s experience with the pilot
work-study program indicates that most
of the jobs occupied by the students
were entry-level positions created
especially for the work-study program.
In addition, the pilot program reduced
the number of jobs being occupied by
student participants by requiring that
four students share a single full-time
position. The Department expects that
its experiences under the new workstudy program will be similar. It
believes that encouraging employers to
create such multiple employment
opportunities for youth who qualify for
participation in the work-study program
warrants this flexibility.
E. Logging Occupations and
Occupations in the Operation of Any
Sawmill, Lath Mill, Shingle Mill, or
Cooperage Stock Mill (Order 4) (29 CFR
570.54)
HO 4 generally prohibits minors 16
and 17 years of age from being
employed in most occupations in
logging and in the operation of a
sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill or
cooperage stock mill. The HO was
created because of the extremely high
numbers of occupational fatalities and
injuries that were experienced by
workers of all ages in these industries.
HO 4 currently provides exemptions
that allow 16- and 17-year-olds to
perform some occupations within the
logging industries. Such minors may
perform work in offices or repair or
maintenance shops. They may work in
the construction, operation, repair, or
maintenance of living and
administrative quarters of logging
camps. They may work in the peeling of
fence posts, pulpwood, chemical wood,
excelsior wood, cordwood, or similar
products when not done in conjunction
with and at the same time and place as
other logging occupations declared
hazardous by HO 4. They may work in
the feeding and care of animals. Finally,
they may work in timber cruising,
surveying, or logging engineering
parties; in the repair or maintenance of
roads, railroads, or flumes; and in forest
protection, such as clearing fire trails or
roads, piling and burning slash,
maintaining fire-fighting equipment,
constructing and maintaining telephone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
lines, or acting as fire lookouts or fire
patrolman away from the actual logging
operations—but only if such tasks do
not involve the felling or bucking of
timber, the collecting or transporting of
logs, the operation of power-driven
machinery, the handling or use of
explosives, and working on trestles.
HO 4 also provides exemptions at
§ 570.54(a) (old and new), permitting
16- and 17-year-olds to be employed in
certain sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill,
or cooperage stock mill occupations.
These exemptions, which do not apply
to work performed in a portable sawmill
or that entails the young worker
entering the sawmill building, permit
16- and 17-year-olds employed in
occupations in the operation of
sawmills, lath mills, shingle mills, or
cooperage stock mills to work in offices
or in repair or maintenance shops; to
straighten, mark, or tally lumber on the
dry chain or the dry drop sorter; pull
lumber from the dry chain; to clean up
the lumberyard; to pile, handle, or ship
cooperage stock in yards or storage
sheds other than operating of or
assisting in the operation of powerdriven equipment; to perform clerical
work in the yards or shipping sheds,
such as done by ordermen, tally-men,
and shipping clerks; to perform cleanup work outside shake and shingle
mills, except when the mill is in
operation; to split shakes manually from
precut and split blocks with a froe and
mallet, except inside the mill building
or cover; to pack shakes into bundles
when done in conjunction with splitting
shakes manually with a froe and mallet,
except inside the mill building or cover;
and to manually load bundles of
shingles or shakes into trucks or railroad
cars, provided that the employer has on
file a statement from a licensed doctor
of medicine or osteopathy certifying the
minor capable of performing this work
without injury to himself.
The NIOSH Report recommends that
the Department not only retain HO 4,
but expand its coverage to include work
in the operation of timber tracts
(Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
081) and forestry services (SIC 085)
because of the high number of fatalities
occurring in such operations (see
NIOSH Report, page 27). The SIC
industry group of timber tracts
encompasses establishments primarily
engaged in the operation of timber tracts
or tree farms for the purpose of selling
standing timber, including those
establishments that grow Christmas
trees. The SIC industry group of forestry
services encompasses establishments
primarily engaged in performing, on a
contract or fee basis, services related to
timber production, wood technology,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28429
forestry economics and marketing, as
well as other forestry services not
contained in another SIC such as timber
cruising, forest fire fighting, and
reforestation. Establishments that
perform timber estimation and valuation
and forest fire prevention and pest
control are also included in SIC 085.
The Report states: ‘‘The logging
industry * * * had the highest lifetime
risk of fatal injury of any industry, at 47
deaths per 1,000 workers based on an
analysis of National Traumatic
Occupational Fatality Surveillance
System data for 1990 and 1991.
Sawmills, planing mills, and millwork
* * * had the 14th highest lifetime risk
of 5.8 deaths per 1,000 workers’’ (see
NIOSH Report, page 28). The Report
also documents that the forestry
industry has a high fatality rate as well,
and workers face injury risks similar to
those of logging workers. Citing data
from the Census of Fatal Occupational
Injuries (CFOI), the Report identified 82
fatalities of workers between 1992 and
1997 employed in the forestry industry
as a whole, which includes
establishments primarily engaged in the
operation of timber tracts, tree farms,
forest nurseries and those providing
related forest service activities such as
cruising and estimating timber,
reforestation, fire prevention and fire
fighting, pest control, timber valuation,
and the gathering of forest products.
Transportation incidents were the most
common fatal event among forestry
workers, accounting for 43 of the 82
deaths (see NIOSH Report, page 30).
Although the Report notes that there
was almost no data specific to workers
16 and 17 years of age, the CFOI
identifies 35 deaths in timber tract
operations for all age groups between
1992 and 1997 and 39 deaths in forestry
service operations for all age groups
during the same period. Forestry
workers also experienced fatal injuries
such as those typically associated with
the logging industry; in 26 of the 82
fatalities the worker was struck by a
falling object (a tree in all but one
instance). In addition, NIOSH also was
able to identify 16 additional deaths of
workers of all ages that were attributable
to forest fire fighting activities (see
NIOSH Report, page 30).
NIOSH notes that work in SIC 083,
forest nurseries and gathering of forest
products, is associated with very small
numbers of fatalities and should not be
prohibited by HO 4. SIC 083
encompasses those establishments
primarily engaged in growing trees for
purposes of reforestation or in gathering
forest products. The concentration or
distillation of these products, when
carried out in the forest, is also included
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28430
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
in this industry. Examples of industries
or activities included in SIC 083 are the
gathering of balsam needles, ginseng,
huckleberry greens, maple sap, moss,
Spanish moss, sphagnum moss,
teaberries, and tree seeds; the
distillation of gum, turpentine, and
rosin if carried on at the gum farm; and
the extraction of pine gum. It should
also be noted that section 13(d) of the
FLSA already provides an exemption
from the Act’s minimum wage,
overtime, and child labor provisions to
any homeworker engaged in the making
of wreaths composed principally of
natural holly, pine, cedar, or other
evergreens (including the harvesting of
the evergreens or other forest products
used in making such wreaths).
The Report also recommends that the
Department remove the current
exemption that permits 16- and 17-yearolds to work in the construction of
living and administrative quarters of
logging camps. The Report states:
‘‘Construction work has high risks for
fatal and nonfatal injuries and should
not be exempted in the construction of
living or administrative quarters at
logging sites or mills’’ (see NIOSH
Report, page 27). The Department
sought public comments about this
issue in the ANPRM that was published
concurrently with the NPRM on April
17, 2007 (72 FR 19328).
As mentioned earlier, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004
(Pub. L. 108–199), amended the FLSA
by creating a limited exemption from
the child labor provisions for minors 14
to 18 years of age who are excused from
compulsory school attendance beyond
the eighth grade. The exemption,
contained in section 13(c)(7) of the
FLSA, allows eligible youth, under
specific conditions, to be employed by
businesses that use machinery to
process wood products, but does not
allow such youth to operate or assist in
operating power-driven woodworking
machines. This exemption necessitates
that the Department revise both Reg. 3
and HO 4.
The Department agreed with the
NIOSH Report recommendation that HO
4 should be expanded to cover work in
forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention because of the risks inherent
in those occupations. The Department
also considered adopting NIOSH’s
recommendation that the employment
of 16- and 17-year-olds be prohibited in
the operation of timber tracts, tree
farms, and forestry services, but was
concerned that such youth may be able
to be safely employed in certain facets
or occupations within those industries.
Therefore, the Department requested in
the NPRM that the public provide
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
information that would help it identify
which occupations or tasks within the
timber tract, tree farm, and forestry
services industries are not particularly
hazardous to youth.
The Department proposed to revise
HO 4 to add a prohibition on the
employment of youth 16 and 17 years of
age in forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention occupations to the current
prohibitions on logging occupations,
and occupations in the operation of any
sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill, or
cooperage stock mill. The Department
proposed to revise the title of HO 4 to
reflect these changes.
Under the proposal, all occupations in
forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention would include the
controlling and extinguishing of fires,
the wetting down of areas or
extinguishing of spot fires, and the
patrolling of burned areas to ensure the
fire has been extinguished. The term
would also include the following tasks
when performed in conjunction with, or
in support of, efforts to extinguish a fire:
The piling and burning of slash; the
clearing of fire trails or roads; the
construction, maintenance, and
patrolling of fire lines; acting as a fire
lookout or fire patrolman; and tasks
associated with the operation of a
temporary fire fighting base camp. The
proposed prohibition concerning the
employment of youth in forest fire
fighting and forest fire prevention
would apply to all forest locations and
buildings located within the forest, not
just where logging or sawmilling takes
place. The Department notes that,
because the FLSA does not cover
individuals who volunteer to perform
services for state or local government
agencies when the provisions in section
3(e)(4) are met, this proposal would not
prohibit 16- and 17-year-old volunteers
from donating their forest fire fighting
services to state and local governments.
The Department also proposed to
incorporate into HO 4 the provisions of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2004 (Pub. L. 108–199), which amended
the FLSA by creating a limited
exemption from the child labor
provisions for certain minors 14 through
17 years of age who are excused from
compulsory school attendance beyond
the eighth grade. The exemption,
contained at section 13(c)(7) of the
FLSA, overrides the HO 4 prohibition
against 16- and 17-year-olds performing
any work in the sawmill industry that
entails entering the sawmill building by
permitting certain youth to be employed
inside and outside of places of business
where machinery is used to process
wood products. The Department
proposed to revise HO 4 to incorporate
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the provisions of section 13(c)(7) in the
same manner, and using the same
definitions and interpretations, as it
proposed when discussing revisions to
Reg. 3, above.
The term all occupations in the
operation of any sawmill, lath mill,
shingle mill, or cooperage stock mill, as
defined by HO 4, specifically excludes
work performed in the planing-mill
department or other remanufacturing
departments of any sawmill, or in any
planing mill or remanufacturing plant
not a part of a sawmill. Although not
defined in the regulations, the
Department has, since at least 1942,
considered the term remanufacturing
departments to mean those departments
of a sawmill where lumber products
such as boxes, lawn furniture, and the
like are remanufactured from previously
cut lumber. The kind of work performed
in such departments is similar to that
done in planing mill departments in
that rough lumber is surfaced or made
into other finished products. The term
is not intended to denote those
operations in sawmills where rough
lumber is cut to dimensions. Because
the Department has, over the years,
received requests for clarification as to
the meaning of remanufacturing
departments, it proposed to add the
above definition to HO 4.
The Department also proposed to
revise HO 4 to include all the
definitions necessitated by the
incorporation of the provisions of FLSA
section 13(c)(7) as discussed earlier in
this document. In addition, the
Department proposed to restructure all
the definitions in HO 4 in an
alphabetical sequence to comport with
guidance provided by the Federal
Register.
The Department decided not to
address, in the NPRM, the NIOSH
Report recommendation to remove the
HO 4 exemption that permits 16- and
17-year-olds to work in the construction
of living and administrative quarters of
logging camps. This is because the
Report also recommended the creation
of a new HO that would prohibit all
work in construction occupations
which, if adopted, would impact the
provisions of not only HO 4 but several
other HOs. The Department believes
additional information is needed before
it can address such a broad
recommendation that would impact all
construction occupations. In an attempt
to obtain such additional information,
the Department requested public
comment on this subject in the 2007
ANPRM.
The Department received five
comments addressing this proposal. The
DOLWD stated it was in agreement with
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the NIOSH recommendations, except
that it believed that 16- and 17-yearolds, after completion of the ten-hour
construction safety and health course
certified by OSHA, could safely be
employed to work in the construction of
living and administrative quarters of
logging camps. The DOLWD also
recommended that an exception be
granted allowing such youth ‘‘to be
employed in logging camp support
positions such as cook, janitor, etc.’’
The Director of Human Capital
Management of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s Forest Service stated that
the Forest Service applauded the
Department of Labor’s proposal that
would prohibit 16- and 17-year-olds
from performing fire fighting duties. The
Forest Service did, however,
recommend that the proposal be revised
to permit such youth to work in forest
protection-type activities, which it sees
as non-hazardous, such as clearing fire
trails or roads, maintaining fire fighting
equipment, and acting as a fire lookout
or fire patrolman. The Forest Service
also noted that it ‘‘currently uses 16- and
17-year-old Job Corps employees and
private contractors in our fire camps to
perform such tasks as building
platforms for tents, stocking commissary
items, performing timekeeping activities
and providing food services.’’
The AFL–CIO, YWN, and CLC all
supported the proposed changes to
prohibit the employment of young
workers in forest fire fighting and forest
fire prevention occupations. All three
also expressed their disappointment
that although the Department
considered adopting NIOSH’s
recommendation that the employment
of 16- and 17-year-olds be prohibited in
the operation of timber tracts, tree
farms, and forestry services, it did not
do so. All three commenters provided
rationales for adopting this NIOSH
recommendation, which included
examples of tasks and exposures
commonly associated with such
industries that they consider to be
hazardous. For example, the AFL–CIO
noted that ‘‘[w]orking in the forest
industry can involve working at heights
* * * These workers also cut the trees
with a chainsaw and drag them from the
cutting area to a truck and then load
them on to a truck. The AFL–CIO
strongly urges DOL not to permit
children under 18 to do any of this
work. Other forestry workers gather
products which requires them to climb
trees * * * children under 18 should
not be able to work at heights in timber
tracts or tree farms.’’ The CLC
commented that ‘‘[w]orking in the
forestry industry can involve working at
heights * * * using machetes and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
pruning shears * * * These workers
also cut the trees with a chainsaw and
drag them from the cutting area and
then load them on to a truck. The CLC
strongly urges DOL not to permit
children under 18 to do any of this
work, much of which is already
prohibited.’’
Finally, the YWN, AFL–CIO, and the
CLC all encouraged the Department to
revise its proposal and accept the
NIOSH recommendation to prohibit the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds in
the constructing and repairing of living
or administrative quarters of logging
camps. The CLC also argued that
language in the proposed HO 4 is
changed from the current rule and
contradicts itself in that § 570.54(a)
declares all occupations in logging to be
particularly hazardous; that the
definition of all occupations in logging
contained in § 570.54(b) includes the
constructing, repairing, and maintaining
of camps used in connection with
logging; and § 570.54(a)(1)(ii) permits
youth to perform such work.
The Department has carefully
reviewed all the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal with
certain modifications that will clarify
the Final Rule. First, the Department has
been persuaded by the comments of the
Forest Service and the DOLWD that 16and 17-year-olds can safely be employed
in certain capacities in forest protection
and in the operation of fire fighting base
camps. The Department now concurs
that employment at such camps, which
are purposely located considerable
distances from forest fires, when in
compliance with all other Hazardous
Occupations Orders, is not particularly
hazardous or detrimental to the health
or well-being of 16- and 17-year-olds.
Such employment is very similar to that
involved with the operation of logging
camps, occupations that 16- and 17year-olds have been permitted to
perform for many years. Accordingly,
the Department has revised the
regulatory language in § 570.54(a)(2).
The Final Rule also provides that 16and 17-year-olds may perform such fire
prevention tasks as the clearing of fire
trails or roads; the construction,
maintenance, and patrolling of fire
lines; the maintaining of fire fighting
equipment; acting as a fire lookout or
fire patrolman; and the piling and
burning of slash. However, such tasks
are permitted only when not performed
in conjunction with extinguishing a
forest fire. The Department believes the
hazards associated with the activities of
extinguishing a forest fire warrant this
prohibition and has clarified the
definition of all occupations in forest
fire fighting and forest fire prevention to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28431
note that such work is prohibited not
only in all forest and timber tract
locations, but also in logging operations,
and sawmill operations, including all
buildings located within such areas.
The revisions the Department
proposed to § 570.54(a)(1) (old) that
removed paragraph (iii) of that
subsection evidenced the Department’s
intention to prohibit 16- and 17-yearolds from employment in most timber
tract and forestry service occupations.
The previous § 570.54(a)(1)(iii)
specifically excluded from the list of
logging tasks deemed to be particularly
hazardous to young workers who work
in timber cruising, surveying or loggingengineering parties; work in the repair
or maintenance of roads, railroads, or
flumes; and work in forest protection,
such as clearing fire trails or roads,
piling and burning slash, maintaining
fire-fighting equipment, constructing
and maintaining telephone lines, or
acting as fire look-out or fire patrolman
away from the actual logging operation.
By removing this subsection, the
Department removes the exception for
timber tract and forestry service
occupations.
The Department, in its 2007 NPRM,
specifically requested public comments
as to which occupations or tasks within
the timber tract, tree farm, and forestry
service industries, if any, are not
particularly hazardous or detrimental to
the health and well-being of youth (see
72 FR 19351). It was the Department’s
intention to qualify in the Final Rule
which occupations, if any, would be
permitted for 16- and 17-year-olds after
the comments were reviewed. No
comments were received that identified
any tasks in these industries as being
safe for minors to perform.
The Department believes that despite
the lack of comments, 16- and 17-yearolds can safely perform certain tasks
within the timber tract, tree farm, and
forestry service industries. Such youth
should be permitted to perform many of
the tasks that HO 4 has long permitted
youth employed in logging to perform:
Working in offices and in repair or
maintenance shops; work in the
construction, operation, repair, or
maintenance of living and
administrative quarters, constructing
and maintaining telephone lines; and
work in the feeding or care of animals.
In addition, youth employed in timber
tract, tree farm, and forestry service
industries should be permitted to
perform tasks related to forest marketing
and forest economics that are not
performed in a forest. Finally, as
mentioned above, such youth should
also be permitted to perform certain
tasks related to forest fire fighting and
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28432
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
forest fire prevention, when not
performed in conjunction with the
extinguishing of a fire, such as the
clearing of trails or roads; the
construction, maintenance, and
patrolling of fire lines; acting as a fire
lookout or fire patrolman; and tasks
associated with the operation of a fire
fighting base camp.
The Department has revised the
regulatory language proposed in the
NPRM for HO 4 at § 570.54(a) to make
it clear that the employment of 16- and
17-year-olds to perform most jobs in
timber tract, forestry service, and tree
farm operations are prohibited. The
revisions also simplify the section by
combining, clarifying, and condensing
previous subsections. The Department
notes that the use of Standard Industrial
Codes by the NIOSH Report was helpful
in identifying the different occupations
and industries that could be impacted
by the Department’s HO. But because
many of the occupations and tasks
addressed by the Final Rule either
appear in more than one code or are not
included in the codes listed in the
Report, the Department did not use
those codes in formulating the
definitions used in the Final Rule. The
Department has added language to
§ 570.54(a) to make it clear that the
limited exceptions to HO 4 listed in that
paragraph do not include any work that
would be prohibited by any other HO
contained in subpart E. The Department
also added clarifying statements to
§ 570.54(a)(8) regarding the types of
work that 14-year-olds employed under
the provisions of FLSA section 13(c)(7)
may perform inside a sawmill. As
discussed earlier, similar clarifying
language was added to § 570.34(m)(2).
The Department has also moved the
definition of portable sawmill contained
within § 570.54(a)(2) (old) to the
Definitions section (§ 570.54(b) (new)).
In addition to changing the title of HO
4 to accommodate this revision, the
Department has also added definitions
of the terms all occupations in forestry
services and all occupations in timber
tracts to § 570.54(b). The Department
has also replaced the words firefighting
and firelines in the Final Rule with the
words fire fighting and fire lines.
All occupations in forestry services
shall mean all work involved in the
support of timber production, wood
technology, forestry economics and
marketing, and forest protection. The
term includes such services as timber
cruising, surveying, or loggingengineering parties; estimating timber;
timber valuation; forest pest control;
forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention as defined in this section;
and reforestation. The term shall not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
include work in forest nurseries,
establishments primarily engaged in
growing trees for purposes of
reforestation. The term shall not include
the gathering of forest products such as
balsam needles, ginseng, huckleberry
greens, maple sap, moss, Spanish moss,
sphagnum moss, teaberries, and tree
seeds; the distillation of gum,
turpentine, and rosin if carried on at the
gum farm; and the extraction of pine
gum.
All occupations in timber tracts
means all work performed in or about
establishments that cultivate, manage or
sell standing timber. The term includes
work performed in timber culture,
timber tracts, timber-stand
improvement, and forest fire fighting
and fire prevention. It would also
include work on tree farms, except those
tree farm establishments that meet the
definition of agriculture contained in 29
U.S.C. 203(f).
F. Occupations Involved in the
Operation of Power-Driven Wood
Working Machines (Order 5) (29 CFR
570.55)
HO 5 generally prohibits the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds in
occupations involving the operating,
setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling,
or cleaning of power-driven
woodworking machines. It also
prohibits the occupations of off-bearing
from circular saws and from guillotineaction veneer clippers. As previously
mentioned, FLSA section 13(c)(7) now
permits certain minors who are at least
14 years of age and under the age of 18
years to be employed inside and outside
of places of business where machinery
is used to process wood products, but
does not allow such youth to operate or
assist in operating power-driven
woodworking machines.
The term power-driven woodworking
machines has long been defined in
§ 570.55(b) to mean all fixed or portable
machines or tools driven by power and
used or designed for cutting, shaping,
forming, surfacing, nailing, stapling,
wire stitching, fastening, or otherwise
assembling, pressing, or printing wood
or veneer. Although FLSA section
13(c)(7) does not impact the
prohibitions of HO 5 because eligible
youth are still prevented from operating
power-driven woodworking machinery,
it does expand the types of workplaces
where certain youth may be employed
to include sawmills, lath mills, shingle
mills, and cooperage stock mills as well
as other workplaces the Department’s
Final Rule includes under Reg. 3 and
HO 4. Employees at these newly
permitted work sites routinely use
power-driven equipment that process
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
materials that may not be included in
the current definition of power-driven
woodworking machines contained in
HO 5, such as trees, logs, and lumber.
Accordingly, the Department proposed
to amend the definition of power-driven
woodworking machines to include those
machines that process trees, logs, and
lumber. To ensure consistency, the
Department proposed that this single
definition of power-driven
woodworking machines be included in
§ 570.34(m) (Reg. 3), § 570.54 (HO 4),
and § 570.55 (HO 5).
The Department also proposed to
restructure the two definitions in this
section to reflect an alphabetical
sequence in accordance with guidance
provided by the Federal Register.
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The
AFL–CIO and YWN agreed with the
Department’s proposal to amend the
definition of power-driven
woodworking machines to include those
machines that process trees, logs, and
lumber. The YWN also recommended
that the proposed definition of powerdriven woodworking machines be
revised to permit 16- and 17-year-olds to
use small hand-held battery-operated
drills that accommodate bits no larger
than 3⁄8″ and hand-held oscillating- or
vibrating-type sanders.
The CLC, YWN, and AFL–CIO
expressed disappointment that the
Department did not adopt NIOSH’s
alternative recommendation that the
Department rewrite HOs 5, 8, and 12,
which respectively address machines
that work with wood, metal, and paper,
by merging them into a single or
multiple HOs which address the
function of the machines rather than the
material processed (see NIOSH Report,
page 31).
After carefully reviewing the
comments, the Department has decided
to adopt the proposal as written. The
Department did not request, nor does it
possess, data regarding whether 16- and
17-year-olds can safely operate portable
drills or sanders, or what requirements
should be imposed to ensure their safe
operation by young workers.
Accordingly, it cannot adopt the
recommendation of the YWN at this
time. The Department notes that it is
exploring the feasibility of adopting
NIOSH’s alternative recommendation
that certain power-driven equipment be
prohibited based on function rather than
on the material being processed.
Because of the complexity of the issue
and in the hopes of obtaining additional
information, the Department requested
public comment on this
recommendation in the ANPRM that
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
was published in conjunction with, and
on the same day as, the NPRM.
G. Occupations Involved in the
Operation of Power-Driven Hoisting
Apparatus (Order 7) (29 CFR 570.58)
HO 7 generally prohibits 16- and 17year-olds from employment in
occupations that involve the work of: (1)
Operating an elevator, crane, derrick,
hoist, or high-lift truck except such
youth may operate unattended
automatic operation passenger elevators
and electric or air operated hoists not
exceeding one ton capacity; (2) riding
on a manlift or on a freight elevator,
except a freight elevator operated by an
assigned operator; and (3) assisting in
the operation of a crane, derrick or hoist
performed by crane hookers, crane
chasers, hookers-on, riggers, rigger
helpers, and like occupations.
The NIOSH Report recommended that
the Department expand HO 7 to prohibit
the repairing, servicing, and
disassembling of the machines and
assisting in tasks being performed by the
machines named in the HO. Assisting in
tasks being performed by the machines
would be tending the machines. The
Report shows that a substantial number
of deaths and injuries are associated
with operating and assisting in tasks
performed by power-driven hoisting
apparatus, including deaths of youth
(see NIOSH Report, page 36).
Additionally, a considerable number of
deaths were associated with activities
not directly related to operation of the
hoisting apparatus, notably servicing,
repairing, and disassembling. Currently,
the work of repairing, servicing,
disassembling, and tending the
machines covered by HO 7 is prohibited
to 14- and 15-year-olds under Reg. 3 at
§ 570.33(b) (old) and § 570.33(c) (new).
Under HO 7, 16- and 17-year-olds may
currently perform such work, except
they may not assist in the operation of
a crane, derrick, or hoist as defined by
the HO.
The Report also recommends that HO
7 be expanded to prohibit youth from
riding on any part of a forklift as a
passenger (including the forks) and from
working from forks, platforms, buckets,
or cages attached to a moving or
stationary forklift. The Report notes that
substantial numbers of fatalities occur
among workers who are passengers on
forklifts, riding on the forks, or working
from the raised forklift attachments (see
NIOSH Report, page 36). Currently, 14and 15-year-olds are prohibited from
riding on forklifts because Reg. 3
prohibits such youth from operating or
tending hoisting apparatus and any
power-driven machines other than
office equipment. The Department has
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
long interpreted tending to include
riding upon the power-driven
equipment. HO 7, however, prohibits
older youth only from operating highlift trucks such as forklifts. Since 1999,
the WHD has investigated at least three
incidents where youth under 18 years of
age were seriously injured while riding
on forklifts being operated by other
employees. One 16-year-old who was
riding on the tines of a forklift suffered
especially serious injuries to his liver
and pancreas as a result of being pinned
against a wall when the driver was
unable to stop the forklift.
The Report also recommends that HO
7 be expanded to prohibit work from
truck-mounted bucket or basket hoists
commonly termed ‘‘bucket trucks’’ or
‘‘cherry pickers’’ because worker
fatalities are associated with work from
such equipment (see NIOSH Report,
page 36). The Report specifically notes
the risk of falls and electrocution being
linked with such equipment. The
Report, citing CFOI data, reflects that
there were 99 worker deaths associated
with truck mounted bucket or basket
hoists between 1992 and 1997 (see
NIOSH Report, page 37).
In addition, the Report recommends
that HO 7 be expanded to prohibit 16and 17-year-olds from employment
involving certain commonly used
manlifts—especially aerial platforms—
that do not meet the current definition
of manlift contained in the HO. The
Report contends that such manlifts
appear to pose more significant injury
risk than those traditionally prohibited
by HO 7 (see NIOSH Report, page 36).
HO 7 defines a manlift as a device
intended for the conveyance of persons
that consists of platforms or brackets
mounted on, or attached to, an endless
belt, cable, chain or similar method of
suspension; such belt, cable or chain
operating in a substantially vertical
direction and being supported by and
driven through pulleys, sheaves or
sprockets at the top and bottom. The
Report is correct that this current
definition of manlift does not include,
and therefore does not prohibit, 16- and
17-year-olds from operating or tending
aerial platforms and other manlifts such
as scissor lifts, boom-type mobile
elevating work platforms, work assist
vehicles, cherry pickers, basket hoists,
and bucket trucks.
The Report also recommends that HO
7 be revised to eliminate the exemption
that permits 16- and 17-year-olds to
operate an electric or air-operated hoist
not exceeding one-ton capacity. The
Report states that current injury and
fatality surveillance systems do not
provide sufficient detail to justify this
exemption. ‘‘A hoisted load weighing
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28433
less than one ton has the potential to
cause injury or death as a result of
falling, or being improperly rigged or
handled. Hoist-related fatalities of
young workers have been reported,
including a recent case in which a youth
was killed while operating a half-ton
capacity hoist’’ (see NIOSH Report, page
36).
The Department proposed to
implement all five of the Report
recommendations concerning HO 7.
Sections 570.58(a)(1) and (a)(2) would
be revised to reflect that in addition to
work involved with operating the
named equipment, the work of tending,
riding upon, working from, servicing,
repairing or disassembling such
equipment would also be prohibited.
Section 570.58(a)(3) would be
eliminated because its provisions would
now be contained in the revised
§ 570.58(a)(1). The work of assisting in
the operation of a crane, derrick, or
hoist would be prohibited because such
tasks fall within the scope of tending of
equipment. The exemption contained in
§ 570.58(a)(1) permitting youth to
operate and ride inside passenger
elevators would be retained, but the
exemption that currently allows 16- and
17-year-olds to operate an electric or airoperated hoist not exceeding one ton
capacity would be eliminated as per the
Report recommendation.
The Department also proposed to
reformat the definitions section
contained in HO 7 to reflect an
alphabetical sequence in accordance
with guidance provided by the Federal
Register. In addition, the Department
proposed to revise the definition of
manlift so that, as recommended by the
Report, it incorporates those pieces of
equipment that perform the same
functions as manlifts but that do not
currently fall within the prohibitions of
the HO. The proposed definition
included a statement that the term
manlift shall also include truck- or
equipment-mounted aerial platforms
commonly referred to as scissor lifts,
boom-type mobile elevating work
platforms, work assist vehicles, cherry
pickers, basket hoists, and bucket
trucks.
The Department also proposed to
revise the definition of high-lift truck to
incorporate a long-standing enforcement
position that industrial trucks such as
skid loaders, skid-steer loaders, and
Bobcat loaders are high-lift trucks as
defined by HO 7. Although not
specifically named as high-lift trucks in
the current HO 7, such equipment meets
the definition of high-lift trucks because
each is ‘‘a power-driven industrial type
of truck * * * equipped with a poweroperated lifting device * * * capable of
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28434
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
tiering loaded pallets or skids one above
the other.’’ The Department has opined
on this matter, in writing, since at least
1993. By adding skid loaders, skid-steer
loaders, and Bobcat loaders to the
definition of high-lift trucks, the
Department believes it will clarify the
requirements for compliance with HO 7.
The Department has successfully
defended this enforcement position,
most recently in a case where minors
were employed to operate a skid-steer
loader to clean trailers used to haul
livestock. In addition to affirming the
Department’s position that a skid loader
was a ‘‘high-lift truck’’ within the
meaning of HO 7, the court also found
that the youths’ operation of the
equipment violated the HO even though
the youth did not operate or utilize the
loader’s hoisting device but used the
skid-steer loader as a ‘‘scraper’’ (see
Lynnville Transport, Inc. v. Chao, 316 F.
Supp. 2d 790 (S.D. Iowa 2004)).
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The YWN,
AFL–CIO, and CLC supported all
elements of the proposal, with
additional recommendations. The YWN
and AFL–CIO suggested that HO 7 be
expanded to prohibit 16- and 17-yearolds from working with hydraulic grease
racks, though the YWN recommended
that an exception be made to permit
automotive repair students in
cooperative education programs who
have been properly trained and receive
appropriate supervision to ‘‘work
around these racks’’ but not to operate
them. The YWN also noted that ‘‘back
hoes’’ and ‘‘front-end-loaders’’ would fall
within the definition of high-lift trucks
and recommended, for the sake of
clarity, that the Department specifically
name them in the revised § 570.58(b).
The CLC noted that the NIOSH Report
recommended that HO 7 prohibit 16and 17-year-olds from employment that,
among other things, included ‘‘assisting
in tasks being performed’’ by the powerdriven hoisting equipment. The CLC
took issue with the Department’s
statement that assisting in tasks being
performed by the machines would
constitute tending—an activity
prohibited by the proposal. The CLC
recommended that the Department
clarify the proposal by specifically
adding ‘‘assisting in tasks being
performed by the equipment’’ to the
language of the Final Rule. The
importance of this recommendation was
poignantly demonstrated by the August
2008 death of a 17-year-old in Georgia
who was crushed to death when a oneton electrical inverter box fell from a
fork lift. The minor was not operating
the forklift at the time of his death but
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
was serving as a ‘‘spotter’’ and assisting
the operator of the forklift.
The Department appreciates the
comments of the YWN, AFL–CIO, and
CLC and has decided to adopt the
proposal with slight modifications
designed for clarification. The
Department will add backhoes and
front-end loaders to the examples of
high-lift trucks contained in § 570.58(b)
as recommended by the YWN. The
Department will also clarify in
§ 570.58(a)(1) and (2) that the term
tending includes assisting in the
hoisting tasks being performed by the
equipment, to add clarity as
recommended by the CLC.
The Department believes additional
information is needed before it can
determine whether 16- and 17-year-olds
who operate hydraulic grease racks are
at risk and notes it requested public
comment on this issue in 2007.
Accordingly, adoption of the
recommendations of the YWN and
AFL–CIO that HO 7 also prohibit the
operation of such equipment would be
premature.
H. Occupations in the Operation of
Power-Driven Meat-Processing Machines
and Occupations Involving
Slaughtering, Meat Packing or
Processing, or Rendering (Order 10) (29
CFR 570.61)
HO 10 generally prohibits 16- and 17year-olds from being employed in all
occupations in or about slaughtering,
meat packing or processing
establishments, and rendering plants.
The HO also prevents such minors from
performing all occupations involved in
the operation or feeding of several
power-driven meat processing machines
when performed in slaughtering and
meat packing establishments, as well as
in wholesale, retail, or service
establishments. The term slaughtering
and meat packing establishments is
defined in HO 10 to mean places in
which cattle, calves, hogs, sheep, lambs,
goats, or horses are killed, butchered, or
processed. The term also includes
establishments that manufacture or
process meat products or sausage casing
from such animals. Under the existing
regulation, the term does not include
establishments that process only
poultry, rabbits, or small game. The
term retail/wholesale or service
establishments, as defined in HO 10,
includes establishments where meat or
meat products are processed or handled,
such as butcher shops, grocery stores,
restaurants, quick service
establishments, hotels, delicatessens,
and meat locker (freezer-locker)
companies, and establishments where
any food product is prepared or
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
processed for serving to customers using
machines prohibited by the HO.
Included on the list of prohibited
power-driven meat processing machines
are meat patty forming machines, meat
and bone cutting saws, meat slicers,
knives (except bacon-slicing machines),
headsplitters, and guillotine cutters;
snoutpullers and jawpullers; skinning
machines; horizontal rotary washing
machines; casing-cleaning machines
such as crushing, stripping, and
finishing machines; grinding, mixing,
chopping, and hashing machines; and
presses (except belly-rolling machines).
The term operation includes setting-up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
such machines, regardless of the
product being processed by the
machine. For example, HO 10 prohibits
a minor from operating a meat slicer in
a restaurant to cut cheese or vegetables.
In addition, the Department has, as early
as 1991, interpreted the prohibition on
cleaning such machines as precluding
16- and 17-year-olds from performing
the hand or machine washing of parts of
and attachments to power-driven meat
processing machines, even when the
machine was disassembled and
reassembled by an adult. This provision
is designed to prevent such youth from
being injured by contact with the
machines’ sharp blades and cutting
surfaces. HO 10 provides a limited
exemption that permits the employment
of apprentices and student-learners
under the conditions prescribed in
§ 570.50(b) and (c).
The NIOSH Report recommends that
HO 10 be expanded to prohibit work in
all meat products manufacturing
industries including those engaged in
the processing of sausages and/or other
prepared meat products and those
engaged in poultry slaughtering and/or
processing (see NIOSH Report, page 41).
The rationale for this recommendation
is that although injury fatality rates in
meat products manufacturing industries
are relatively low, rates of disorders due
to repeated trauma are extremely high.
This is also true for poultry processing
which is not encompassed in the
existing HO. In addition, there are a
number of diverse and serious health
hazards associated with the slaughtering
of animals and manufacturing of meat
products, including exposure to
infectious agents and respiratory
hazards. The Report notes that in 1997
there were an estimated 13,646
occupational injuries and illnesses
resulting in days away from work
among employees in the meat products
manufacturing industry. Although the
greatest number of these injuries and
illnesses occurred in meat packing
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
plants (5,526), establishments that
produce sausages and prepared meats
experienced 4,147 injuries and illnesses,
and poultry slaughtering and processing
establishments experienced 3,937 that
same year (see NIOSH Report, page 43).
In 1999, the Department investigated the
death of a young poultry processing
worker in Arkansas and the serious
injury of a similarly employed minor in
Missouri who injured both of his legs
when he slipped and fell into an auger.
The minor also suffered severe nerve
damage and second degree burns.
The Report also recommends that HO
10 be revised to allow 16- and 17-yearolds to operate and feed power-driven
meat and food slicers in retail,
wholesale and service industry
establishments. This is one of the few
recommendations the Report makes that
would relax current prohibitions, and it
is made with the rationale that
‘‘although data show high numbers of
injuries associated with power-driven
slicers, the injuries appear to be
relatively minor.’’ NIOSH includes the
caveat that if this recommendation is
implemented ‘‘it should be accompanied
by a mandatory reporting period in
which all serious youth injuries and
deaths resulting from previously
prohibited activities are promptly
reported to the U.S. Department of
Labor.’’ Such a reporting plan would
allow an assessment as to whether the
revision should be rescinded or further
refined to best protect working youth
(see NIOSH Report, page 48).
Finally, the Report recommends that
the apprenticeship and student-learner
exemption contained in HO 10 be
restricted to apply only to 16- and 17year-olds employed in retail, wholesale,
and service industries. The Report
recommends that this exemption no
longer be applicable to the employment
of such minors in meat products
manufacturing industries.
The Department proposed to
implement the Report recommendation
to expand the application of HO 10 to
prohibit the employment of 16- and 17year-olds in all meat products
manufacturing industries, including
those engaged in the processing of
sausages and/or other prepared meat
products and those engaged in poultry
slaughtering and/or processing. The
Department proposed to revise the term
slaughtering and meat packing
establishments contained in § 570.61(b)
so that the term also includes places
where poultry are killed, butchered, or
processed. This term would also include
establishments that manufacture or
process meat products, including
poultry, sausage, or sausage casings. The
Department also proposed to add
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
buffalo and deer to the lists of animals
contained in the definitions of the terms
killing floor and slaughtering and meat
packing establishments and to note that
these lists are not exhaustive. The
Department also proposed to revise the
title of HO 10 to reflect its expansion to
the slaughtering of poultry, and the
processing, packing, and rendering of
poultry and poultry products. The
current HO 10 exemption permitting the
killing and processing of rabbits or
small game in areas physically
separated from the killing floor would
not be changed.
The Department also proposed to
revise § 570.61(a)(4) to incorporate its
interpretation that the prohibition
against 16- and 17-year-olds cleaning
power-driven meat processing machines
extends to washing the machine’s parts
and attachments, even if the machine is
disassembled and reassembled by an
adult. This proposal, however, would
not prevent a 16- or 17-year-old from
operating a commercial dishwasher to
run a self-contained rack containing
parts of or attachments to a powerdriven meat processing machine
through the dishwasher so long as the
youth does not actually handle or touch
the machine parts or attachments.
The Department also proposed to
reformat, in an alphabetical sequence,
all the definitions found in § 570.61(b)
to comport with guidance provided by
the Federal Register.
The Department decided not to
propose implementation of the Report
recommendation that would allow 16and 17-year-olds to operate and feed
power-driven meat and food slicers in
retail, wholesale and service industry
establishments. Both the Report and the
Department’s enforcement experience
reflect that meat slicers are responsible
for many occupational injuries. The
Report notes that the Survey of
Occupational Injuries and Illnesses
reports that in 1997, food and beverage
processing machinery were responsible
for 11,737 nonfatal injuries and illness
that resulted in days away from work.
Over sixty percent of that number, 7,280
injuries and illnesses, were caused by
food slicers. The median number of
days away from work for workers who
suffered food slicer related injuries or
illnesses was four days, not an
insignificant number (see NIOSH
Report, page 47). Since October 1999,
the Department has investigated at least
36 injuries of young workers that were
caused by operating or cleaning powerdriven meat slicers. Although none of
these injuries were life threatening,
most were considered to be serious and
many caused the partial loss of digits
and will leave some permanent scarring.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28435
The Department also decided not to
propose implementation at this time of
the Report recommendation concerning
limiting the current apprenticeship and
student-learner exemption contained in
HO 10 to retail, wholesale and service
industries. The apprenticeship and
student learner exemptions contained in
certain HOs were developed relatively
independently of each other as each HO
was adopted. The issue of allowing
certain training exemptions from the
HOs first arose in the early 1940s, after
the enactment of the first six HOs. HO
5 was amended to permit the
employment of student learners and
apprentices, but HOs 1 through 4 were
not. Each committee convened
thereafter to study, draft, and implement
a new HO developed its own criteria for
determining the appropriateness of
including apprentice and studentlearner exemptions and was not
restricted by the determinations made
by previous committees. The Report
makes several recommendations
concerning the establishment, revision,
and elimination of apprenticeship and
student-learner exemptions, but the
rationale for each recommendation
either is vague or is not provided. The
Department believes that before any
changes to the existing exemptions are
made, it is important to consider and
develop criteria for determining when
apprenticeship and student-learner
exemptions are appropriate. Such
criteria, which must be consistent with
the established national policy of
balancing the benefits of employment
opportunities for youth with the
necessary and most effective safety
protections, will also be of value as the
Department considers creating new
HOs. Accordingly, the Department
issued an ANPRM, in conjunction with
and on the same day as the NPRM, to
solicit public comment on this
important issue.
The Department received six
comments in response to this proposal.
The AFL–CIO, YWN, and CLC
supported the proposal to expand the
scope of HO 10 to prohibit the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds in
or about places where such animals as
cattle, calves, hogs, poultry, sheep,
lambs, goats, buffalo, deer, or horses are
killed, butchered, or processed and
where sausage and sausage casings are
manufactured or processed. The
Department received no comments
opposing adoption of this portion of the
proposal. The YWN also recommended
that HO 10 be expanded to cover
seafood processing occupations.
The AFL–CIO, YWN, CLC and Six
Flags all supported the Department’s
decision not to accept the NIOSH
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28436
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Report’s recommendation to allow 16and 17-year-olds to operate and feed
power-driven meat and food slicers in
retail, wholesale and service industry
establishments. These four commenters
also supported the Department’s
proposal regarding the cleaning of such
equipment. The FMI and the Council
both recommended that the Department
reconsider and adopt the NIOSH
recommendation that would allow 16and 17-year-olds to operate and feed
power-driven meat and food slicers. The
Council stated ‘‘[t]he NIOSH
recommendation appears wellsupported’’ while the FMI believed the
Department’s position to be ‘‘surprising
as the NIOSH recommendations are
based on the hard data and analysis that
DOL asked NIOSH to provide.’’ Neither
the Council nor the FMI commented on
the Department’s proposal regarding the
cleaning of power-driven meat
processing equipment.
Both the YWN and the CLC disagreed
with the Department’s decision not to
implement at this time the NIOSH
Report recommendation to limit the
student-learner and apprentice
exemption contained in HO 10 to retail,
wholesale, and service industries.
After carefully reviewing the
comments, the Department has decided
to implement the proposal as written
with the following modifications. The
Department is adding poultry scissors
and shears to the list of prohibited
power-driven meat processing machines
listed in § 570.61(a)(4) in recognition
that the HO now covers poultry
processing. The Department is also
revising § 570.61(a)(7), which for many
years has prohibited 16- and 17-yearolds from handlifting or handcarrying
any carcass or half carcass of beef, pork
or horse, to include carcasses or half
carcasses of buffalo and deer. This
revision would also expand the current
prohibitions involving quarter carcasses
of beef and horse to include buffalo.
These revisions are necessitated by the
expansion of the prohibitions of HO 10
to include the processing of such
animals. Finally, the Department is
adding a statement to § 570.61(a)(4) to
clarify that the limited exemption to HO
11 which permits 16- and 17-year-olds
to operate certain lightweight, small
capacity, portable counter-top powerdriven food mixers (see § 570.62(b)(1))
would not apply when the equipment is
adapted—through the use of various
attachments—to perform functions other
than mixing, or to process meat or
poultry products because of the
prohibitions of HO 10. This
modification is discussed in more detail
further in the section of this preamble
that addresses HO 11.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Department appreciates the
concerns of the FMI and the Council,
but must reiterate that the number and
severity of occupational injuries
suffered by youth who operate or clean
power-driven meat slicers do not justify
allowing youth to operate or clean such
equipment. The Department notes that,
since publishing the NPRM, it has
investigated the serious injuries of at
least ten more young workers who
operated or cleaned such equipment.
The Department also recognizes the
concerns of the YWN and CLC over the
Department’s decision not to limit the
student-learner and apprentice
exemption contained in HO 10 at this
time. As noted in the NPRM, the
Department believes that before any
changes to the existing student-learner
and apprentice exemptions are made, it
is important to consider and develop
criteria for determining when studentlearner and apprentice exemptions are
appropriate. As mentioned, the
Department issued an ANPRM, in
conjunction with and on the same day
as the NPRM, to solicit public comment
on this important issue.
The Department appreciates the
YWN’s recommendation that HO 10
should be expanded to cover seafood
processing occupations, but notes that
no data was submitted regarding the
level of youth employment in that
industry or the injury rates experienced
by that industry.
I. Occupations Involved in the
Operation of Bakery Machines (Order
11) (29 CFR 570.62)
HO 11 generally prohibits the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds in
occupations involved in the operation of
power-driven bakery machines.
Prohibited activities include operating,
assisting to operate, setting up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
any horizontal or vertical dough mixer;
batter mixer; bread dividing, rounding,
or molding machine; dough brake;
dough sheeter; combination bread
slicing and wrapping machine; or cake
cutting band saw. The HO also prohibits
the employment of such youth in the
occupation of setting up or adjusting a
‘‘cooky’’ or cracker machine. The
prohibitions of the HO do not
differentiate between portable and nonportable equipment, and models
designed for use in the home versus
those solely designed for industrial
applications. Therefore, the prohibitions
of HO 11 include the employment of 16and 17-year-olds to operate even the
smallest of counter-top vertical mixers.
In response to information presented
by several restaurants and employer
associations, the Department adopted an
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
enforcement position in 1990 that it
would not assert a violation of HO 11
when a 16- or 17-year-old employee
operated a pizza-dough roller, a type of
dough sheeter, when the machine: (1) Is
constructed with safeguards contained
in the basic design so as to prevent
fingers, hands, or clothing from being
caught in the in-running point of the
rollers; (2) has gears that are completely
enclosed; and (3) has microswitches that
disengage the machinery if the backs or
sides of the rollers are removed. This
enforcement position applies only when
all the safeguards detailed above are
present on the machine, are operational,
and have not been overridden. In
addition, this enforcement position
applies only to the operation of the
machine. HO 11 still prohibits 16- and
17-year-olds from being employed in
occupations involving the setting up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
of such pizza-dough rollers. The
Department has restated this position
numerous times in response to written
requests and has included this position
in its Field Operations Handbook since
at least 1992.
The Report recommends that HO 11
be relaxed to allow the operation of
counter-top models of power-driven
bakery machines, comparable to those
intended for household use. The
Report’s rationale for this
recommendation is that available data
suggest that there were no fatalities
involving such counter-top powerdriven machines, and nonfatal injuries
requiring time away from work are of
moderate severity (see NIOSH Report,
page 48). Although, as noted, the HO
prohibits the use of several different
power-driven bakery machines, the
thrust of the Report’s recommendation
involves food mixers. The Report notes
that there were 712 non-fatal injuries
and illnesses in 1997, with a median of
11 days away from work, associated
with work with mixers, blenders, and
whippers (see NIOSH Report, page 49).
The Department’s enforcement
experience includes situations where
employers have questioned why 16- and
17-year-olds were not permitted to use
small mixers to process such things as
cheese dip and batter for seafood when
such machines generally appeared to
present no risks to such minors.
Recently, the Department adopted an
enforcement policy that it would not
assert violations of HO 11 when 16- and
17-year-olds operate, assist to operate,
setup, adjust, repair, oil, or clean certain
small, lightweight, counter-top mixers.
The Department proposed to
implement the Report’s
recommendation by creating a new
§ 570.62(b)(1) that would include an
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
exemption allowing the employment of
16- and 17-year-olds to operate—
including setting-up, adjusting,
repairing, oiling, and cleaning—
lightweight, small capacity, portable
counter-top power-driven food mixers
that are, or are comparable to, those
models intended for household use.
The Department, during its meetings
held after the release of the Report with
various stakeholders, including
representatives of the full-service and
quick-service restaurant industries,
sought to identify which types of mixers
could be operated safely in the
workplace by 16- and 17-year-olds. The
information provided, which also
echoed the Department’s enforcement
experiences, indicated that such factors
as bowl capacity, the horsepower of the
motor, the portability of the machine
(light weight and not permanently wired
or ‘‘hardwired’’ into the establishment’s
electrical power source), and similarity
to equipment designed exclusively for
home use were all important criteria.
For purposes of this exemption, the
Department proposed that a lightweight,
small capacity mixer is one that is not
hardwired into the establishment’s
power source, is equipped with a motor
that operates at no more than 1⁄2
horsepower, and whose bowl capacity
does not exceed five quarts. Minors 14and 15-years of age would still be
prohibited from operating or assisting in
the operation of such mixers under the
provisions of Reg. 3 (see § 570.33(e)
(new)).
The Department also proposed to
incorporate into § 570.62 its longstanding enforcement position regarding
the operation of certain pizza-dough
rollers by 16- and 17-year-old workers.
The Department’s enforcement
experience indicates that when
employers properly apply this limited
enforcement position, 16- and 17-yearolds can safely operate pizza-dough
rollers. Accordingly, the Department
proposed to create a new § 570.62(b)(2)
that will permit such youth to operate—
but not set-up, adjust, repair, oil, or
clean—those power-driven pizza-dough
rollers that: (1) Are constructed with
safeguards contained in the basic design
so as to prevent fingers, hands, or
clothing from being caught in the inrunning point of the rollers; (2) have
gears that are completely enclosed; and
(3) have microswitches that disengage
the machinery if the backs or sides of
the rollers are removed. The exception
in § 570.62(b)(2) would apply only
when all the safeguards detailed above
are present on the machines, are
operational, and have not been
overridden.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Department also proposed to
change the word cooky in § 570.62(a)(2)
to cookie to reflect the more common
spelling of that word.
The Department received five
comments regarding this proposal. The
FMI, Council, AFL–CIO, and YWN all
supported adoption of the Department’s
enforcement position allowing 16- and
17-year-olds to operate—including
setting-up, adjusting, repairing, oiling,
and cleaning—lightweight, small
capacity, portable counter-top powerdriven food mixers that are, or are
comparable to, those models intended
for household use. No comments were
received opposing this proposal.
The FMI, Council, and AFL–CIO also
supported the proposal to adopt the
Department’s long-standing enforcement
position permitting 16- and 17-year-olds
to operate—but not set-up, adjust,
repair, oil, or clean—certain powerdriven pizza dough rollers. The YWN
opposed this proposal, stating ‘‘[a]bsent
any concrete information on injury data,
and on the specific size, make, or
models under consideration as possible
examples, we disagree with this
proposal at this time.’’ The YWN also
endorsed the NIOSH Report
recommendation that more intensive
surveillance of pertinent injuries and
deaths resulting from the operation of
power-driven bakery machines be
conducted should the Department adopt
these proposals.
The CLC opposed this proposal and
reiterated its concerns about the
Department’s use of its prosecutorial
discretion to establish enforcement
positions in the administration and
enforcement of the child labor
provisions of the FLSA.
The Department carefully considered
all the comments and has decided to
adopt the proposal with one clarifying
modification. The Department wishes to
make it clear that the exemption
contained in § 570.62(b)(1) (new) that
permits 16- and 17-year-olds to operate
certain lightweight, small capacity,
portable counter-top power-driven food
mixers would not apply when the
equipment is adapted—through the use
of various attachments—to perform
functions other than mixing, or to
process meat or poultry products
because of the prohibitions of HO 10
(Occupations in the operation of powerdriven meat-processing machines and
occupations involving slaughtering,
meat and poultry packing, processing,
or rendering) (see § 570.61, old and
new). It is important to note that the
functions of such mixers, as well as how
they are addressed by HO 10 and HO 11,
change when different ‘‘attachments’’ are
used. For example, a ‘‘mixer’’ as
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28437
discussed in § 570.62(b)(1) would
become a ‘‘grinder’’ prohibited by HO 10
(see § 570.61(a)(4)) when the grinding
attachment is in use. As per the
provisions of § 570.61(a)(4), it would not
matter if products other than meat—
such as vegetables or cheese—were
being processed. The Department is
including this information in both
§ 570.62(b)(1) and § 570.61(a)(4)) to
avoid confusion and facilitate
compliance.
The Department appreciates the
concerns of the YWN and CLC regarding
the use of certain power-driven pizza
dough rollers, but again notes that its
enforcement experience indicates that
when employers properly apply all the
provisions of the enforcement
position—which have been included in
the proposed limited exemption—16and 17-year-olds can safely operate such
equipment. The Department also notes,
as it has stated previously in this Final
Rule, that its limited and public exercise
of its prosecutorial discretion is an
efficient and permissible tool available
to the Secretary in the administration of
the child labor provisions of the FLSA.
J. Occupations Involved in the
Operation of Paper-Products Machines,
Scrap Paper Balers, and Paper Box
Compactors (Order 12) (29 CFR 570.63)
Hazardous Occupations Order No. 12
generally prohibits minors under 18
years of age from working in
occupations involving the operation of
paper-products machines. The HO
prohibits, with certain exceptions
discussed below, the loading, operating,
and unloading of scrap paper balers,
including paper box balers and
compacting machines, and other powerdriven machines used in the
remanufacture or conversion of paper or
pulp into a finished product. When HO
12 was promulgated in 1954, the
dangers specifically associated with the
operation of scrap paper balers involved
being caught in the plungers during the
compression process and suffering
strains and other injuries while moving
the compressed bales.
The Compactor and Baler Act was
enacted on August 6, 1996 (Pub. L. 104–
174). This legislation amended the
FLSA by adding subsection 13(c)(5),
which permits 16- and 17-year-olds to
load, but not operate or unload, certain
scrap paper balers and paper box
compactors only when certain
conditions are met. One such condition
is that the equipment must meet specific
standards issued for balers or for
compactors by the American National
Standard Institute (ANSI). ANSI is a
national organization that coordinates
the development of voluntary,
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28438
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
consensus standards in a wide range of
areas, including product and worker
safety.
When enacting the Compactor and
Baler Act, Congress explicitly applied
certain industry standards for the
determination of which balers and/or
compactors are safe for minors to load:
ANSI Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990 for
scrap paper balers or Standard ANSI
Z245.2–1992 for paper box compactors.
Congress has used ANSI standards in
other contexts as expressions of the best
available technology in the safety area.
For example, the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 directed the
Department of Labor to adopt the thenexisting ANSI standards, rather than
delay any activity until the agency
promulgated particular occupational
safety and health standards (see section
6(a) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act, 29 U.S.C. 655(a)). The ANSI
standards for scrap paper balers and
paper box compactors govern the
manufacture and modification of the
equipment, the operation and
maintenance of the equipment, and
employee training. The Compactor and
Baler Act also provides that any new
standard(s) adopted by ANSI would also
be sufficient for the safety of the scrap
paper balers and paper box compactors,
if the Secretary of Labor certifies the
new standard(s) to be at least as
protective of the safety of minors as the
two standards specified in the Act. In
the Final Rule issued in 2004, the
Department stated that it would publish
a Notice in the Federal Register when
the Secretary made any such
certifications.
Because these ANSI standards are
copyright-protected, the Department
cannot include them in the regulations
or reproduce them for distribution to the
public. Copies of these standards are
available for purchase from the
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI), 25 West 43rd St., Fourth Floor,
New York, NY 10036. The telephone
number for ANSI is (212) 642–4900 and
its Web site is located at https://
www.ansi.org. In addition, these
standards are available for inspection at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. These
standards are also available for
inspection at the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration’s Docket
Office, Room N–2625, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210, or any of
its regional offices. The telephone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
number for the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration’s Docket Office is
(202) 693–2350 and its Web site is
located at https://dockets.osha.gov.
The Department issued a Final Rule
on December 16, 2004 (69 FR 75382),
which revised HO 12 to incorporate the
provisions of the Compactor and Baler
Act. The Final Rule became effective on
February 14, 2005. As supported by the
provisions of the Compactor and Baler
Act, the Final Rule expanded the
coverage of HO 12 to include those
balers and paper box compactors that
process other materials in addition to
paper products. Prohibited machines
include those indoor-types of powerdriven trash compactors equipped with
built-in carts that detach from the
compactor to facilitate disposal of the
compacted waste. With this type of
machine, an attendant wheels the cart to
the dumpster, empties the cart into the
dumpster, and then wheels the cart back
to the compactor where it is reattached.
Also included would be ‘‘public use’’
waste receptacles—often found at
airports and other large complexes—that
include compaction equipment that
allow the public to dispose of refuse and
then automatically processed the waste
at predetermined intervals.
The Final Rule also included the
Secretary’s certification, as permitted by
the Compactor and Baler Act, that the
new Standard ANSI Z245.5–1997 is as
protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI–S245.5–1990, and that
the new Standard ANSI Z245.2–1997 is
as protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992.
Accordingly, these newer standards
were incorporated into HO 12.
The Department, when issuing the
2004 Final Rule, noted that there still
remained one class of balers and
compactors that falls outside of the
scope of HO 12—those machines that
are designed or used exclusively to
process materials other than paper. The
Report, in recognition of this gap in
coverage, recommends that HO 12 be
revised to include such machines
because ‘‘balers and compactors used to
process other scrap materials such as
plastic and aluminum cans pose similar
risk of injury from crushing or
amputation’’ (see NIOSH Report, page
50).
The Report notes that baler and
compactor related deaths are not limited
to those in which paper or cardboard is
being processed. Many machines are
adaptable for the baling and compacting
of a wide variety of materials, including
paper, aluminum cans, plastic milk jugs,
and general refuse. Other machines are
intended specifically for processing a
single product, such as metals. These
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
specialized metal balers and
compactors, which process such items
as cars, radiators, and siding, may share
similar designs and operating
procedures with those compactors and
balers that process only paper products
or process other materials in addition to
paper products. However, these
specialized metal balers also include
large industrial machines that feature
shear blades that are not normally
present on lighter-duty type balers. The
Report notes that while these large
specialized balers are generally found in
facilities that specialize in processing
scrap and waste materials, smaller
general-purpose portable machines that
serve the same functions are marketed
for use in businesses such as grocery
stores, hotels, restaurants, and hospitals.
These smaller general-purpose
machines operate in essentially the
same manner as the larger machines and
present similar risks of injury.
In addition, the Report recommends
that the Department continue to
emphasize enforcement of portions of
the Compactor and Baler Act requiring
that balers and compactors conform to
construction and operations standards
that greatly reduce exposure to
hazardous energy. The Report notes that
investigations of baler-related incidents
show that failure to maintain machinery
in safe operating condition contributes
to fatalities and serious injuries and that
neither adult supervisors nor young
workers may fully appreciate the risks
posed by uncontrolled hazardous
energy. The Report also recommends
that the Department retain the limited
exemption contained in § 570.63(c)(2)
that permits apprentices and studentlearners to perform, under specific
guidelines, tasks that would otherwise
be prohibited by HO 12.
The Department agreed with the
NIOSH Report recommendation
regarding the scope of the HO and
proposed to revise HO 12 to prohibit 16and 17-year-olds from operating,
loading, and unloading, with limited
exceptions, all balers and compactors,
regardless of the materials being
processed. Both NIOSH occupational
injury data and the Department’s
enforcement experience reflect that
injuries occur when youth operate
balers and compactors that are designed
and used to process materials other than
paper. For example, the Department
investigated the employment of a 17year-old who had both legs amputated
in a large industrial baler machine at a
recycling center. The machine was the
only baler at the center and, therefore,
was used to process a wide variety of
items. In a different investigation,
another 17-year-old lost his right index
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
finger while putting recyclables into an
industrial waste compactor by hand.
The limited exemption provided by
FLSA section 13(c)(5) and contained in
§ 570.63(c)(1), which allows 16- and 17year-old workers, under specific
conditions, to load but not operate or
unload certain scrap paper balers and
paper box compactors, would remain.
This exemption, as detailed in the
Compactor and Baler Act, would apply
only to certain scrap paper balers and
paper box compactors, as currently
defined in § 570.63(b). The exemption
would not apply to balers and
compactors that are not designed or
used to process paper or cardboard as
such equipment may not be considered
scrap paper balers or paper box
compactors as required by the
Compactor and Baler Act.
The proposed revision would be
accomplished by adding new
subsections to § 570.63 that would
prohibit 16- and 17-year-olds from
performing the occupations of operating
or assisting to operate any baler or
compactor that is designed or used to
process materials other than paper. A
baler that is designed or used to process
materials other than paper would be
defined in § 570.63(b) to mean a
powered machine designed or used to
compress materials other than paper or
cardboard boxes, with or without
binding, to a density or form that will
support handling and transportation as
a material unit without requiring a
disposable or reusable container. A
compactor that is designed or used to
process materials other than paper
would be defined in § 570.63(b) to mean
a powered machine that remains
stationary during operation, designed or
used to compact refuse other than paper
or cardboard boxes, into a detachable or
integral container or into a transfer
vehicle. The occasional processing of
paper or a cardboard box by a machine
designed to process other materials
would not bring the loading of such
machines within the limited exemption
provided by section 13(c)(5).
The prohibition against such youth
setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling,
or cleaning any of the machines
currently listed in HO 12 would be
extended to include compactors and
balers that are designed to process
materials other than paper.
As previously noted, the Compactor
and Baler Act provides that any new
standard(s) adopted by ANSI would also
be sufficient for the determination of the
safety of the scrap paper balers and
paper box compactors, if the Secretary
of Labor certifies the new standard(s) to
be at least as protective of the safety of
minors as the two standards specified in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Act. In the 2004 Final Rule, the
Secretary certified that Standard ANSI
Z245.5–1997 is as protective of the
safety of minors as Standard ANSI–
S245.5–1990 and that Standard ANSI
Z245.2–1997 is as protective of the
safety of minors as Standard ANSI
Z245.2–1992. Accordingly, the newer
standards were incorporated into HO
12.
In 2004 ANSI adopted Standard ANSI
Z245.2–2004 (Stationary Compactors—
Safety Requirements for Installation,
Maintenance, and Operations) and
Standard ANSI Z245.5–2004 (Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements for
Installation, Maintenance, and
Operations). The Department’s
preliminary review of these new
Standards, which included input from
NIOSH, indicated that the Standards are
as protective as those cited in the
Compactor and Baler Act and should be
included in HO 12 along with the older
Standards.
The Department appreciates the
Report’s recommendation to continue
emphasizing enforcement of portions of
the Compactor and Baler Act requiring
that balers and compactors conform to
construction and operations standards
that greatly reduce exposure to
hazardous energy. The Report notes that
investigations of baler-related incidents
show that failure to maintain machinery
in safe operating condition contributes
to fatalities and serious injuries and that
neither adult supervisors nor young
workers may fully appreciate the risks
posed by uncontrolled hazardous energy
(see NIOSH Report, page 50). The
Department’s enforcement experience
supports these findings. Most recently,
the Department investigated the death of
a 16-year-old grocery store worker in
New York who was crushed to death by
a baler that had been jerry-rigged to
operate while the door to the loading
chamber was open. This over-riding of
an important safety device required by
each of the ANSI Standards was done to
speed up the loading process. As
discussed previously, in order for an
employer to avail itself of the limited
exemption contained in § 570.63(c)(1)
that permits 16- and 17-year-olds under
certain conditions to load, but not
operate or unload, certain scrap paper
balers and paper box compactors, the
employer must determine that the
equipment meets an appropriate ANSI
Standard listed in HO 12. The employer
must also post a notice on the machine
that states, among other things, which
applicable ANSI Standard the machine
meets. The appropriate ANSI Standards
govern not only the manufacture and
modification of the equipment, but the
operation and maintenance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28439
equipment, and employee training as
well. During enforcement actions
involving employers who avail
themselves of the limited exemption
contained in § 570.63(c)(1), the
Department routinely confirms whether
the scrap paper baler or paper box
compactor being loaded by 16- or 17year-olds meets the requirements of the
applicable ANSI Standard, as
determined and declared by the
employer. If the equipment does not
meet the requirements of an applicable
ANSI Standard, or if the employer failed
to make such a determination, or if any
other requirement of the limited
exemption contained in FLSA section
13(c)(5) was not met, a violation of HO
12 has most likely occurred. The
Department will carry on these efforts
and will continue to work with both
NIOSH and OSHA to better educate
employers, employees, and enforcement
personnel about the requirements of the
ANSI Standards. Such efforts impact the
safety of all workers, not just those
under the age of 18.
Finally, the Department proposed to
take no action concerning the NIOSH
Report recommendation concerning the
apprenticeship and student-learner
exemption to HO 12 at this time. As
previously discussed, the Department
issued an ANPRM, in conjunction with
and on the same day as the NPRM, that
requested information from the public
on this issue.
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The brief
comments of the AFL–CIO stated that it
‘‘strongly supports the DOL’s proposal to
extend prohibitions to include
operating, loading and unloading balers
and compactors designed or used to
process materials other than paper.’’ The
YWN was equally brief, stating ‘‘[t]he
Network strongly agrees with this
proposed change.’’
The CLC ‘‘welcomed’’ the expansion
of the prohibitions of HO 12 to include
balers and compactors designed or used
to process materials other than paper. It
states that the Department did not
address the NIOSH Report’s third
recommendation dealing with HO 12
regarding the importance of enforcing
the requirements of FLSA section
13(c)(5) that balers and compactors
being loaded by 16- and 17-year-olds
meet the designated ANSI standards.
The CLC also cited additional ANSI
standards that touch upon equipment
used in the waste disposal and recycling
industries and questioned why these are
not incorporated into HO 12. The CLC
also was concerned that the ANSI
standards are copyright-protected and
that employers must either purchase
them from the American National
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28440
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Standards Institute or visit a designated
OSHA office to view them. It also
expressed concerns that employers may
have difficulty interpreting the ANSI
standards. Finally, the CLC disapproved
of the Department’s decision to not
revisit the limited exemption currently
contained in HO 12 for student-learners
and apprentices.
No comments were received regarding
whether Standard ANSI Z245.5–2004 is
as protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990 and
whether Standard ANSI Z245.2–2004 is
as protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal, but with
one modification concerning recently
issued ANSI Standards and a revision to
the section heading. The Department
disagrees with the CLC’s comment that
it failed to address NIOSH’s third
recommendation and notes that the
recommendation clearly reads that the
Department should ‘‘continue to
emphasize enforcement positions of the
Compactor and Baler Act requiring
balers to conform to construction and
operational standards that greatly
reduce exposure to hazardous energy.’’
As noted in the NPRM and again in this
Final Rule, the Department considers
this statement to be an endorsement of
its administration and enforcement of
HO 12 and agreed to continue this
important activity.
The Department notes that when the
Compactor and Baler Act was enacted,
Congress took considerable pains to
ensure that the legislation contained
appropriate safeguards that would
provide young workers with necessary
protections while ensuring that the
employers of such youth could achieve
and maintain compliance. During this
process, Congress solicited input from
the Department, NIOSH, employers,
employer associations, and employee
associations. The result was, as
discussed earlier, that the Compactor
and Baler Act required that before 16and 17-year-olds could load such
equipment, the scrap paper baler had to
meet Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990 and
the paper box compactor had to meet
Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992. Congress
could have chosen to include other
standards—earlier versions of those
ANSI standards the CLC now suggests
the Department should include in HO
12—but it did not.
The Department believes Congress
was aware that such standards are
copyright protected and available to the
public only at a cost or for reviewing at
an appropriate library. The
Department’s enforcement experience
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
confirms that employers have many
ways of ensuring that, should they wish
to take advantage of the limited
exception contained in FLSA section
13(c)(5), their balers and compactors
comply with the appropriate ANSI
standard. Such employers can consult
with the manufacturer of the equipment,
the supplier of the equipment, the
owner of the equipment if the
equipment is leased, industry and/or
employer associations, OSHA, and
safety engineering consultants. No
employer or employer association, when
commenting on the 1999 or the 2007
NPRM, reported that it was difficult or
expensive to determine that their balers
and/or compactors met or failed to meet
the appropriate ANSI standards.
Congress also provided the Secretary
of Labor with flexibility when
administering FLSA section 13(c)(5) by
allowing balers and compactors to meet
any additional standards adopted by
ANSI if certified by the Secretary to be
at least as protective of the safety of
minors as the standards contained in the
Compactor and Baler Act. The
Department interprets this provision as
permitting it to incorporate only more
recent versions of Standard ANSI
Z245.5–1990 and Standard ANSI
Z245.2–1992—the two standards
contained in the original legislation.
The Department followed this
interpretation when it amended HO 12
and added Standards ANSI Z245.5–
1997 and ANSI Z245.2–1997 in 2004
(see 69 FR 75396) and again when
promulgating this Final Rule.
The Department’s review of Standard
ANSI Z245.2–2004 has found it to be as
protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992, and the
Department’s review of Standard ANSI
Z245.5–2004 has found it be as
protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990.
The NPRM notified the public that the
Department intended to update HO 12
to include the 2004 ANSI standards for
compactors and balers, and no
comments were received as to whether
the standards identified in the NPRM
were as protective of minors as the
standards listed in the Compactor and
Baler Act. After the 2007 NPRM was
published, ANSI adopted two new
standards related to balers and
compactors: Standard ANSI Z245.2–
2008 (Stationary Compactors—Safety
Requirements for Installation,
Maintenance, and Operations) and
Standard ANSI Z245.5–2008 (Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements for
Installation, Maintenance, and
Operations). The Department’s review of
these new Standards, which included
input from NIOSH, concluded that the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2008 ANSI Standards are also as
protective as those cited in the
Compactor and Baler Act. Therefore, the
Department has decided to also
incorporate the 2008 ANSI standards
into this Final Rule. The Secretary, in
promulgating this Final Rule, hereby
certifies that Standard ANSI Z245.2–
2004 and Standard ANSI Z245.2–2008
are as protective of the safety of minors
as Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992 and that
Standard ANSI Z245.5–2004 and
Standard ANSI Z245.5–2008 are as
protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990.
Accordingly, these four newer standards
are included in the Final Rule. The
Department has also decided to provide
a table listing all the applicable ANSI
Standards in § 570.63(c)(1)(iv)(A).
The Department has decided to revise
the title of HO 12 to reflect that, under
the Final Rule, it will prohibit
occupations involved in the operation of
all balers and compactors, including
those that do not process any paper
products. Accordingly, the title has been
revised as follows: Occupations
involved in the operation of balers,
compactors, and paper-products
machines (Order 12).
As noted earlier, FLSA section
13(c)(5) and § 570.63(c)(1)(iv) require
that before a 16- or 17-year-old
employee may load a baler or compactor
subject to HO 12, his or her employer
must first post a notice on the
equipment stating that: (1) The baler or
compactor meets the named applicable
ANSI standard; (2) sixteen- and 17-yearold employees may only load the baler
or compactor; and (3) any employee
under the age of 18 may not operate or
unload the baler or compactor. The
Department recognizes the importance
of these posting requirements in the
administration of section 13(c)(5) and
addressed this issue in detail in the
preamble to the Final Rule published in
the Federal Register on December 16,
2004 (69 FR 75382).
Since publication of the 2007 NPRM,
the Department has received several
inquiries regarding how these posting
requirements impact employers of youth
who do not own or control the baler or
compactor that is available for use by
their employees. In certain situations,
such as at shopping malls, industrial
parks, office buildings, or military bases,
multiple employers may have access to
and use ‘‘community’’ balers and
compactors that the facilities manager or
owner has made available to the tenants
or contractors. In these situations, the
Department has determined that it is not
necessary for every employer (tenant)
that wishes to take advantage of the
loading exemption to post a notice on
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
the communal equipment as required by
FLSA section 13(c)(5). The facilities
manager or owner, or the owner of the
equipment, may make the necessary
postings and satisfy each employer’s
(tenant’s) posting obligations under the
exemption. But the employer (tenant)
must exercise due vigilance, for should
the notice be inaccurate or incomplete—
i.e., the baler or compactor fails to meet
the appropriate ANSI standard, or the
notice fails to fully identify the
appropriate ANSI standard—the burden
of compliance remains with the
employer (tenant) of any youth who
loaded the equipment. An incomplete or
inaccurate posting by the facilities
manager or owner will not relieve an
employer from being charged with a
violation of HO 12 or assessed a child
labor civil money penalty. Employers
that avail themselves of the provisions
of the loading exemption contained in
FLSA section 13(c)(5) and rely on the
accuracy of notices posted by others
cannot delegate their compliance
obligations imposed by that exemption.
Finally, the Department notes that the
CLC takes exception to the Department
not taking any action on the NIOSH
Report recommendation regarding the
limited exemption contained in HO 12
for student-learners and apprentices. As
the Report recommends that the limited
exception contained in HO 12 for
apprentices and student-learners be
retained, the Department’s decision not
to address that issue is in full agreement
with that recommendation.
K. Occupations Involved in the
Operation of Circular Saws, Band Saws,
and Guillotine Shears (Order 14) (29
CFR 570.65)
HO 14 generally prohibits the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds in
the occupations of operator or helper on
power-driven circular saws, band saws,
and guillotine shears, except those that
are properly guarded and equipped with
devices for full automatic feeding and
ejection. The prohibitions of HO 14 are
based on the equipment and apply
regardless of the materials being
processed. Section 570.65(b)(4) defines
the term circular saw to mean a machine
equipped with a thin steel disc having
a continuous series of notches or teeth
on the periphery, mounted on shafting,
and used for sawing materials. The term
band saw is defined in § 570.65(b)(5) to
mean a machine equipped with an
endless steel band having a continuous
series of notches or teeth, running over
wheels or pulleys, and used for sawing
materials. Section 570.65(b)(6) defines
the term guillotine shear to mean a
machine equipped with a moveable
blade operated vertically and used to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
shear materials. The term does not
include other types of shearing
machines, using a different form of
shearing action, such as alligator shears
or circular shears. HO 14 also prohibits
such minors from setting-up, adjusting,
repairing, oiling, or cleaning circular
saws, band saws, and guillotine shears.
The original report that led to the
issuance of HO 14 in 1960 noted that
these machines had already been found
and declared to be particularly
hazardous for 16- and 17-year-old
employees when used to process certain
materials. Circular saws and band saws
were already covered under HO 5 when
used on wood, HO 10 when used on
meat, and HO 12 when used on paper
products. Band saws were also covered
under HO 11 when used to cut sheet
cakes to desired sizes and shapes.
Guillotine shears are covered under HOs
5, 8, 10 and 12 when used on wood,
metal, meat, and paper products,
respectively. Reports showing that
minors were being injured when
operating these machines on materials
not covered by an existing HO led the
Department to issue the allencompassing HO 14.
The NIOSH Report recommends that
HO 14 be expanded to cover other
machines, such as chain saws, that
perform cutting and sawing functions
through direct contact between the
cutting surfaces and the materials. The
Report also recommends, alternatively,
that the Department consider
developing a new HO that would
prohibit all sawing machinery that
performs cutting and sawing functions
through direct contact of the cutting
surface and the material being
processed. The Report states:
‘‘Stationary saws and hand-held saws,
including chain saws, continue to be the
source of substantial numbers of
fatalities as well as nonfatal injuries
which may be unusually severe’’ (see
NIOSH Report, page 56). The Report
observes that not all machines that
perform cutting and sawing functions fit
into HO 14’s definitions of circular saw,
band saw, or guillotine shears; for
example, abrasive cutting disks do not
have visible notches or teeth, but they
perform the same function. The Report
notes that available data demonstrate
that chainsaws specifically contributed
to 70 worker deaths between 1992 and
1997 and over 1,600 lost workday
injuries. Some of these fatalities
involved workers under 18 years of age
(see NIOSH Report, page 57). The
Report also recommends that the
Department retain the exemption
contained in HO 14 that permits 16- and
17-year-old apprentices and student
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28441
learners to perform work that would be
otherwise prohibited by the HO.
The Department has long taken the
position that HO 4 (Logging occupations
and occupations in the operation of any
sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill, or
cooperage stock mill) prohibits 16- and
17-year-olds from operating chain saws
in logging operations because the HO
prohibits all work ‘‘in connection with
the felling of timber.’’ Likewise, the
Department has consistently taken the
position, starting as early as 1959, that
HO 5 (Occupations involved in the
operation of power-driven woodworking
machines) prohibits these same minors
from using chain saws to cut wood and
wood products, including trees and
branches. Over the last ten years, the
Department has investigated the serious
injuries of several youth that resulted
from the use of chain saws to cut
branches and trees, charged violations
under HO 5, and assessed and collected
civil money penalties because of those
violations. However, as the Report
implies, the use of chain saws by 16and 17-year-olds would not be
prohibited when cutting other materials
such as metal, concrete, stone, and ice.
The Department has also long taken
the position that HO 5 prohibits the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds to
operate wood chippers to grind tree
limbs, branches, and trunks into chips,
mulch, or debris. Some questions have
recently been raised concerning the
appropriateness of this position, but the
Department has been consistent in its
application when the equipment is used
to process wood and trees. Young
workers have been killed or seriously
injured while operating wood chippers.
In 2000, the Department investigated the
death of a 14-year-old member of a treetrimming crew who was dismembered
when he became entangled in branches
he was feeding into a drum-type wood
chipper. In 2001, the Department
investigated the serious injury of a 17year-old who suffered a fractured skull
when the wood chipper he was feeding
‘‘spit out’’ a 12-inch long, 4-inch
diameter, piece of a tree branch. Three
titanium plates were permanently
implanted into the minor’s skull. The
Department charged the employer of
this youth with a violation of HO 5, and
assessed and collected a civil money
penalty because of the violation.
Just like in 1960 when HO 14 was first
issued, the Department is receiving
reports of injuries and deaths, such as
the ones described in the preceding
paragraphs, of youth operating powerdriven machines that may be prohibited
when used to process certain types of
materials and not prohibited when
processing other types of materials.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28442
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Reciprocating saws constitute another
example of such a machine. HO 5
prohibits the employment of 16- and 17year-olds to operate reciprocating saws
that are used or designed for cutting
wood, but the same piece of equipment
is permitted when used or designed
exclusively to cut materials other than
wood, such as metal. The Department
has learned of occupational injuries to
workers operating reciprocating saws to
cut materials other than wood. The
Department is aware of the death of an
adult plumber in Minnesota in 2002
who was killed when the blade of the
reciprocating saw he was using to
rough-in plumbing entered his head
near his eye. The U.S. Department of
Energy has also reported that in 2002 an
adult worker injured his larynx when
the reciprocating saw he was operating
kicked back and cut him in his lower
throat. The American Journal of
Forensic Medicine and Pathology
(Volume 28, No. 4, December 2001)
reports on the death of a 32-year-old
male who lost his balance and fell on
the blade of an electric reciprocating
saw he was using to trim branches. The
blade perforated his anterior chest wall,
right lung, heart, and aorta. The Journal
noted that the victim had been drinking
beer while trimming the branches.
Finally, in 2004, the Department
investigated the death of a 17-year-old
worker who was employed to operate a
reciprocating saw to salvage automobile
catalytic converters for recycling. While
operating the saw, the vehicle upon
which he was using the saw fell on him
and crushed him to death.
The Department proposed to revise
the prohibitions of HO 14 to include
chain saws, wood chippers, and
reciprocating saws. The prohibition
would not depend on the material or
materials being processed and would
encompass the occupations of settingup, adjusting, repairing, oiling, or
cleaning such machines. This revision
would be accomplished by revising
§ 570.65(a)(2) to prohibit the
employment of minors in the
occupations of operator of or helper on
power-driven chain saws, wood
chippers, and reciprocating saws,
whether the machines are fixed or
portable. Unlike the machines currently
listed in § 570.65(a)(1), the prohibition
would not be lifted if the chain saws,
wood chippers, or reciprocating saws
were equipped with full automatic feed
and ejection-devices—devices that are
almost never found on such equipment.
The current § 570.65(a)(2) would be
redesignated as § 570.65(a)(3) and
revised to reflect that 16- and 17-yearolds could not be employed in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
occupations involving the setting-up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
of any of the equipment covered by the
HO. The Department also proposed to
revise the title of HO 14 to reflect its
application to the additional pieces of
machinery and to change the word
operations to operation. Finally, the
Department proposed to restructure the
definitions section contained at
§ 570.65(b) in an alphabetical sequence
to comport with guidance provided by
the Federal Register and to include
definitions of the terms chain saw,
wood chipper, and reciprocating saw.
The term chain saw would mean a
machine that has teeth linked together
to form an endless chain used for
cutting materials. The term wood
chipper would mean a machine
equipped with a feed mechanism,
knives mounted on a rotating chipper
disc or drum, and a power plant used
to reduce to chips or shred such
materials as tree branches, trunk
segments, landscape waste, and other
materials. The term reciprocating saw
would mean a machine equipped with
a moving blade that alternately changes
direction on a linear cutting axis used
for sawing materials.
The Department is evaluating the
alternative recommendation made by
the Report that it consider developing a
new HO that combines the sawing
machinery covered under HO 14 with
other specialized machinery that
performs cutting and sawing functions
through direct contact of the cutting
surface and the material. Similar
alternative recommendations were made
regarding HO 5 (Occupations involved
in the operation of power-driven
woodworking machines) and HO 8
(Occupations involved in the operation
of power-driven metal forming,
punching, and shearing machines). The
Department will continue to study these
recommendations.
Finally, the Report also recommended
that the Department retain the limited
exemption contained in § 570.65(c) that
permits apprentices and studentlearners to perform, under specific
guidelines, tasks that would otherwise
be prohibited by HO 14. As discussed
previously in the sections dealing with
HOs 10 and 12, the Department
proposed to take no action concerning
the apprenticeship and student-learner
exemptions to certain HOs at this time.
The Department received three
comments on this proposal. The YWN
stated that it ‘‘strongly agrees with this
change.’’ The AFL–CIO supported the
proposal and suggested that ‘‘abrasive
cutting discs’’ be added to the list of
prohibited equipment. Such discs were
mentioned in the NIOSH Report as
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
cutting equipment that falls outside the
prohibitions of HO 14. The CLC stated
that it ‘‘welcomes’’ the proposed
inclusion of chain saws, wood chippers,
and reciprocating saws but also ‘‘sees no
reason for DOL’s failure to include
abrasive cutting discs as well.’’ The CLC
also disagreed with the Department’s
decision not to address the issue of
student-learners and apprentices in this
Final Rule.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the comments and has
decided to adopt the proposal with one
modification. The Department
appreciates the comments of the AFL–
CIO and the CLC concerning the
omission of abrasive cutting discs from
the list of prohibited equipment
contained in HO 14. The Department
notes that although NIOSH did not
include injury data specific to the
operation of abrasive cutting discs,
NIOSH did report that the potential
contact with the moving disk of an
abrasive cutting tool does put operators
at risk. The Department has decided to
add abrasive cutting discs to the list of
machines prohibited by HO 14 because
it would be in keeping with the NIOSH
recommendation and will provide
important protections to working youth.
The Department has defined abrasive
cutting disc to mean a machine
equipped with a disc embedded with
abrasive materials used for cutting
materials.
The Department once again notes that
it has requested public comment on the
issue of exemptions for student-learners
and apprentices in the ANPRM that was
published in conjunction with, and on
the same day as, the NPRM.
L. Additional Recommendations of the
Report
The NIOSH Report recommends that
the Department retain, as currently
issued, HO 3 (Coal mining occupations),
HO 13 (Occupations involved in the
manufacture of brick, tile, and kindred
products), HO 15 (Occupations involved
in wrecking, demolition, and
shipbreaking occupations), and HO 17
(Occupations in excavation operations).
The Department accepted those
recommendations and proposed no
revisions to these HOs. The Report also
recommends that the Department
remove the limited exemption for
apprentices and student-learners
contained in HO 16 (Occupations in
roofing operations and on or about a
roof) and HO 17, and retain the same
exemption as it applies to HO 5
(Occupations involved in the operation
of power-driven woodworking
machines) and HO 8 (Occupations
involved in the operation of power-
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
driven metal forming, punching, and
shearing machines). As discussed
previously in the sections dealing with
HOs 10, 12, and 14 of this preamble, the
Department proposed to take no action
concerning the apprenticeship and
student-learner exemptions to any of the
HOs at this time. The Department
believes that before any changes to the
existing exemptions are made, it is
important to first consider and develop
criteria for determining when
apprenticeship and student-learners
exemptions are appropriate.
Accordingly, the Department issued an
ANPRM, in conjunction with and on the
same day as the NPRM, that sought
information from the public on this and
other issues.
Only the CLC commented on this
proposal, expressing its disappointment
that the Department has decided not to
address recommendations regarding the
limited exemptions provided for
student-learner and apprentices at this
time.
M. Subpart G—General Statements of
Interpretation of the Child Labor
Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938, as Amended (29 CFR
570.101–570.129)
Subpart G discusses the meaning and
scope of the child labor provisions of
the FLSA. The interpretations of the
Secretary of Labor contained in subpart
G indicate the construction of the law
that guides the Secretary in
administrating and enforcing the Act.
Since the last revision of subpart G in
1971, Congress has passed several
amendments to the FLSA and the
Department has revised other subparts
of 29 CFR part 570 that are not currently
reflected in subpart G. The Department
proposed to revise subpart G to
accommodate not only the statutory and
regulatory changes that have occurred,
but to reflect the proposed revisions to
part 570 made by the NPRM and
discussed earlier in this document. The
proposed revisions to subpart G were as
follows:
1. Section 570.103(c) states that there
are only four specific child labor
exemptions contained in the FLSA, and
only one of them, concerning the
delivery of newspapers to the consumer,
applies to the minimum wage and
overtime requirements of the Act as
well. Congress has created four
additional exemptions to the
nonagricultural child labor provisions of
the FLSA that are not currently reflected
in subpart G (the making of wreaths
composed principally of natural holly,
pine, cedar, or other evergreens by
homeworkers; the loading of certain
scrap paper balers and paper box
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
compactors by 16- and 17-year-olds; the
limited driving of certain automobiles
and trucks by 17-year-olds; and the
employment of certain youth between
the ages of 14 and 18 years inside and
outside of places of business that use
power-driven machinery to process
wood products). The exemption
concerning the employment of
homeworkers who make wreaths,
contained in FLSA section 13(d), is an
exemption from the minimum wage and
overtime provisions of the Act as well
as its child labor provisions. The
Department proposed to revise
§ 570.103(c) to reflect that the FLSA
now contains eight exemptions from the
child labor provisions and that two of
these exemptions are also exemptions
from the Act’s minimum wage and
overtime requirements.
This same subsection cites FLSA
section 3(d), which defines the term
employer and then, in footnote 4,
discusses that definition. FLSA section
3(d) was amended in 1966, and the
provisions of that amendment are not
reflected in subpart G. The Department
proposed to revise footnote 4 of
§ 570.101(c) to include the more recent
definition of the term employer and to
correct an erroneous reference to FLSA
section 13(d).
2. Section 570.118 notes that the
FLSA sets a minimum age of 16 years
for employment in manufacturing or
mining, but does not take into account
the effects of the 2004 enactment of
FLSA section 13(c)(7). Section 13(c)(7)
allows the employment of certain 14and 15-year-olds inside and outside of
places of business that use power-driven
machinery to process wood products as
discussed above. The Department
proposed to revise § 570.118 to
incorporate the provisions of FLSA
section 13(c)(7).
3. Section 570.119 discusses those
occupations in which 14- and 15-yearold minors may and may not be
employed under Reg. 3. The Department
proposed to revise this section to
incorporate the changes necessitated by
the adoption of FLSA section 13(c)(7)
and to reflect the proposed revisions to
§§ 570.33 and 570.34 as discussed
above. For the sake of both brevity and
clarity, the Department proposed not to
repeat in § 570.119 the lists of all the
occupations contained in §§ 570.33 and
570.34, but rather to refer readers to
those sections.
The proposed revision to § 570.119
would contain the general prohibition
against the employment of minors under
14 years of age under any circumstances
that is currently included at the end of
§ 570.119.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28443
4. Section 570.120 describes the
authority and process by which HOs are
adopted, and lists those occupations the
Secretary has found and declared to be
particularly hazardous or detrimental to
the health or well-being of minors 16
and 17 years of age. Since subpart G was
last revised, not only have several HOs
been amended, but the process for
promulgating and revising the HOs has
also changed. Before 1995, the process
for promulgating and amending HOs
included public hearings and advice
from committees composed of
representatives of employers and
employees of the impacted industry and
the public, in accordance with the
procedures established by subpart D of
this part. The Department issued a Final
Rule on April 17, 1995 (60 FR 19336)
that deleted subpart D and placed the
process of promulgating and revising
HOs solely under the provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 551 et seq., which governs
Departmental rulemaking.
The Department proposed to revise
§ 570.120 to reflect the 1995 change in
the process for issuing and revising
HOs. The Department also proposed, for
the sake of brevity and clarity, not to
repeat the list of individual HOs as they
are already listed in subpart E of 29 CFR
part 570.
5. Section 570.122 lists the four
exemptions from the FLSA child labor
provisions that existed when subpart G
was last revised. As discussed earlier,
Congress has added four more
exemptions that are not included in the
current subpart G.
The Department proposed to revise
§ 570.122 by creating new subsections
(e), (f), (g), and (h), which will list the
exemptions from the child labor
provisions contained in FLSA sections
13(d), 13(c)(5), 13(c)(6), and 13(c)(7),
respectively. A more thorough
discussion of each of these exemptions
was proposed to be included in
§§ 570.127-.130.
6. The Department proposed to revise
§§ 570.127, .128, and .129, and create a
new § 570.130 to present detailed
discussions of the exemptions from the
child labor provisions contained in
FLSA sections 13(d), 13(c)(5), 13(c)(6),
and 13(c)(7). These proposed provisions
were structured similarly to those
already contained in subpart G that
address the earlier FLSA exemptions
concerning employment of youth in
agriculture (§ 570.123), in the delivery
of newspapers (§ 570.124), as actors and
performers (§ 570.125), and by one’s
parents (§ 570.126). The Department
also proposed to revise and redesignate
the sections of subpart G currently
dealing with general enforcement
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28444
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(§ 570.127), good faith defense
(§ 570.128), and the relation of the child
labor provisions to other laws
(§ 570.129). These sections would be
redesignated as § 570.140, § 570.141,
and § 570.142, respectively. The
Department proposed to reserve
§§ 570.131 through 570.139 to
accommodate any additional statutory
amendments to the FLSA child labor
provisions that may be enacted.
7. Section 570.127 contains a general
discussion of the enforcement of the
FLSA child labor provisions. Since that
last revision of subpart G, Congress in
1996 amended the FLSA at section 16(e)
so that any person who violates the
provisions of section 12 or section
13(c)(5) relating to child labor, or any
regulation issued under section 12 or
section 13(c)(5), shall be subject to a
civil money penalty, currently not to
exceed $11,000, for each employee who
was the subject of such a violation. The
Department, as discussed above,
proposed to redesignate this section as
§ 570.140 and to revise it to include the
Department’s authority to assess civil
money penalties against persons who
violate the child labor provisions of the
Act.
8. Section 570.128 deals with a
provision of FLSA section 12(a) that
relieves from liability a purchaser who
ships or delivers for shipment in
commerce goods acquired in good faith
in reliance on written assurance from
the producer, manufacturer, or dealer
that the goods were produced in
compliance with section 12 and that
were acquired for value without notice
of any violation. The Department
proposed to redesignate this section as
§ 570.141.
9. Section 570.129 discusses the
relationship of the child labor
provisions of the FLSA to other laws.
The Department proposed to redesignate
this section as § 570.142.
No comments were received on these
proposals to amend Subpart G. The
Department has decided to adopt the
above proposals as written, with three
exceptions. The Department is slightly
modifying the proposed revisions to
§ 570.122 so as to incorporate guidance
provided by the Federal Register. This
modification does not change the
content of the Department’s original
proposal. In addition, the Department
will not implement its proposal to
reserve §§ 570.131 through 570.139,
again at the direction of the Federal
Register.
Finally, on May 21, 2008, after
publication of the NPRM, the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of
2008 (GINA), Public Law 110–233, was
signed into law. This Act, among other
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
things, amends section 16(e) of the Fair
Labor Standards Act by increasing the
maximum permissible civil money
penalty an employer may be assessed
for child labor violations that cause the
death or serious injury of a young
worker. FLSA Section 16(e) now states
that any person who violates the
provisions of FLSA sections 12 or 13(c),
relating to child labor, or any regulation
issued pursuant to such sections, shall
be subject to a civil penalty not to
exceed $11,000 for each employee who
was the subject of such a violation. This
same section also permits the
assessment of a penalty not to exceed
$50,000 with regard to each violation
that causes the death or serious injury
of any employee under 18 years of age.
That penalty may be doubled up to
$100,000 if the violation is determined
to be a repeated or willful violation.
Accordingly, the Department is revising
the proposed § 570.140 (as redesignated
as discussed in paragraph 7 above) to
incorporate the provisions of GINA. The
provisions of GINA and the impact they
have on this rulemaking are more fully
discussed later in Section O of this
preamble.
N. Miscellaneous Matters, 29 CFR Part
570
The Department proposed to change
the name of HO 8 from Occupations
involved in the operations of powerdriven metal forming, punching, and
shearing machines (Order 8) to
Occupations involved in the operation
of power-driven metal forming,
punching, and shearing machines
(Order 8).
The Department has decided to adopt
this proposal as written. Only the CLC
commented on this proposal, incorrectly
referring to it as ‘‘correcting a
typographical error.’’ The word
‘‘operations’’ was the word used by the
Department when HO 8 was first
enacted in 1950 and its use was
appropriate for the time. The
Department’s replacing of that word
with ‘‘operation’’ reflects the current
usage of the word.
The Department has made minor,
nonsubstantive changes to the proposed
§ 570.119 to better explain the purpose
of § 570.33. In addition, the Department
has updated references made in
§ 570.102 and in Footnote 21, which is
cited in § 570.111. These changes were
necessitated by the other revisions made
in subpart G. Typographical and
grammatical errors in the proposed
regulatory text were also corrected.
Finally, pursuant to guidance
provided by the Federal Register, the
Department is issuing the proposed
§§ 570.35a and 570.35b as §§ 570.36 and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
570.37 and redesignating existing
§§ 570.36 and 570.37 as §§ 570.38 and
570.39, respectively.
O. Civil Money Penalties; 29 CFR Part
579
Section 16(e) of the FLSA subjects any
person who violates the child labor
provisions of the Act to civil money
penalties. On May 21, 2008, the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of
2008 (GINA) (Pub. L. 110–233) was
enacted into law. GINA, among other
things, amended FLSA section 16(e) so
that any person who violates the
provisions of sections 12 or 13(c) of the
FLSA, relating to child labor, or any
regulation issued pursuant to such
sections, shall be subject to a civil
money penalty not to exceed $11,000 for
each employee who was the subject of
such a violation. In addition, GINA also
permits the assessment of a civil money
penalty not to exceed $50,000 with
regard to each violation that caused the
death or serious injury of any employee
under the age of 18 years. That penalty
may be doubled, up to $100,000, when
such violation is determined by the
Department to be a repeated or willful
violation. These changes in the law
became effective May 21, 2008.
As mentioned above, the NPRM
proposed to revise § 570.127 and
redesignate it as § 570.140. In addition
to taking these steps, the Final Rule will
incorporate the provisions of GINA into
(new) § 570.140. The Final Rule will
also revise those provisions of 29 CFR
part 579 relevant to civil monetary
penalties in order to incorporate the
provisions of this recent statutory
amendment into the regulations.
The Department is incorporating the
child labor civil money penalty
provisions of the GINA amendments
into this Final Rule without prior notice
and opportunity for public comment
because it has for good cause found,
pursuant to the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), that
these procedural requirements are
unnecessary with respect to these
particular regulatory changes. The
regulatory changes in (new) § 570.140
and Part 579 implement the recent
legislation that revised the civil
monetary penalties that may be assessed
under section 16(e) of the FLSA. In
bringing the regulations into conformity
with the statutory amendments, the
Department is not exercising any
interpretative authority. Accordingly,
the Department is incorporating the
provisions of the statutory amendments
into the Final Rule without notice and
comment.
Specifically, the Department is
revising § 579.1(a) to incorporate the
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of section 16(e) of the FLSA
as revised by GINA. The Department is
also revising the definitions section in
§ 579.2 to include the terms serious
injury, repeated violations, and willful
violations.
GINA amended FLSA section 16(e) to
define serious injury as (1) permanent
loss or substantial impairment of one of
the senses (sight, hearing, taste, smell,
tactile sensation); (2) permanent loss or
substantial impairment of the function
of a bodily member, organ, or mental
faculty, including the loss of all or part
of an arm, leg, foot, hand or other body
part; or (3) permanent paralysis or
substantial impairment that causes loss
of movement or mobility of an arm, leg,
foot, hand or other body part.
Although GINA does not define the
terms repeated violations and willful
violations, those terms already have
been defined by the Wage and Hour
Division (see 29 CFR 578.3(b) and (c)),
and are currently applied, pursuant to
section 16(e) of the Act, in the
assessment of civil money penalties for
repeated and willful violations of
sections 6 and 7 of the FLSA. Applying
those definitions to civil money
penalties under 29 CFR part 579, an
employer’s violation of section 12 or
section 13(c) of the Act relating to child
labor or any regulation issued pursuant
to such sections shall be deemed to be
repeated: (1) Where the employer has
previously violated section 12 or section
13(c) of the Act relating to child labor
or any regulation issued pursuant to
such sections, provided the employer
has previously received notice, through
a responsible official of the Wage and
Hour Division or otherwise
authoritatively, that the employer
allegedly was in violation of the
provisions of the Act; or (2) where a
court or other tribunal has made a
finding that an employer has previously
violated section 12 or section 13(c) of
the Act relating to child labor or any
regulation issued pursuant to such
sections, unless an appeal therefrom
which has been timely filed is pending
before a court or other tribunal with
jurisdiction to hear the appeal, or unless
the finding has been set aside or
reversed by such appellate tribunal.
For purposes of the assessment of
civil money penalties under 29 CFR part
579, an employer’s violation of section
12 or section 13(c) of the Act relating to
child labor or any regulation issued
pursuant to such sections shall be
deemed to be willful where the
employer knew that its conduct was
prohibited by the Act or showed
reckless disregard for the requirements
of the Act. All of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the violation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
shall be taken into account in
determining whether a violation was
willful. In addition, for purposes of this
section, an employer’s conduct shall be
deemed knowing, among other
situations, if the employer received
advice from a responsible official of the
Wage and Hour Division to the effect
that the conduct in question is not
lawful. For purposes of this section, an
employer’s conduct shall be deemed to
be in reckless disregard of the
requirements of the Act, among other
situations, if the employer should have
inquired further into whether its
conduct was in compliance with the
Act, and failed to make adequate further
inquiry.
Finally, the Department is also
revising § 579.5, sections (a) and (e), to
note that FLSA section 16(e) references
both sections 12 and 13(c) when
discussing the types of child labor
violations that are subject to the
assessment of civil money penalties.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and its attendant
regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, the
Department seeks to minimize the
paperwork burden for individuals, small
businesses, educational and nonprofit
institutions, Federal contractors, State,
local and tribal governments, and other
persons resulting from the collection of
information by or for the agency. The
PRA typically requires an agency to
provide notice and seek public
comments on any proposed collection of
information contained in a proposed
rule (see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(B); 5 CFR
1320.8). The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on April 17, 2007 (72
FR 19337) invited comments on the
information collection burdens imposed
by these regulations. No comments were
received regarding the information
paperwork burden estimates.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number (see 5 CFR 1320.6). The
Department submitted the information
collections contained in § 570.37
(previously proposed as § 570.35b) of
this rule to the OMB for approval, and
OMB approved them under OMB
Control Number 1215–0208. The
approval expires on May 31, 2013,
unless extended by OMB. A copy of the
information collection request can be
obtained at https://www.RegInfo.gov or
by contacting the Wage and Hour
Division as shown in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28445
Circumstances Necessitating
Collection: The Department has created
a new 29 CFR 570.37 that describes the
conditions that allow the employment
of 14- and 15-year-olds—pursuant to a
school-supervised and schooladministered Work-Study Program
(WSP)—under conditions Reg. 3
otherwise prohibits. The new regulation
requires the implementation of a new
paperwork burden with regard to a
WSP.
FLSA section 3(l) establishes a
minimum age of 16 years for most
nonagricultural employment but allows
the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds
in occupations other than
manufacturing and mining, if the
Secretary of Labor determines such
employment is confined to periods that
will not interfere with the minor’s
schooling and conditions that will not
interfere with the minor’s health and
well-being.
FLSA section 11(c) requires all
employers covered by the FLSA to
make, keep, and preserve records of
their employees’ wages, hours, and
other conditions and practices of
employment. Section 11(c) also
authorizes the Secretary of Labor to
prescribe the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for these
records. Reg. 3 sets forth the
employment standards for 14- and 15year-olds.
Reporting Requirements: WSP
Application: In order to utilize the Reg.
3 WSP provisions, § 570.37(b)(2)
requires a local public or private school
system to file with the Administrator of
the Wage and Hour Division an
application for approval of a WSP as
one that does not interfere with the
schooling or health and well-being of
the minors involved.
Written Participation Agreement: The
regulations require preparation of a
written participation agreement for each
student participating in a WSP and that
the teacher-coordinator, employer, and
student each sign that agreement (see
§ 570.37(b)(3)(iv)). The regulation also
requires that the student’s parent or
guardian sign the training agreement, or
otherwise give consent to the agreement,
in order for it to be valid.
Recordkeeping Requirements: The
regulation requires a school system
operating a WSP to keep a copy of the
written participation agreement for each
student enrolled in the WSP at the
student’s school. Employers of WSP
participants are also required to keep a
copy of the written participation
agreement for each student employed.
These agreements shall be maintained
for 3 years from the date of the student’s
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28446
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
enrollment in the WSP (see
§ 570.37(b)(4)(ii)).
Purpose and Use: WSP Application:
Under the regulations, a local school
system shall file a letter of application
requesting the Administrator of the
Wage and Hour Division to approve a
WSP that permits the employment of
14- and 15-year-olds under conditions
that Reg. 3 would otherwise prohibit.
The Department will evaluate the
information to determine if the program
meets the requirements specified in the
regulation, in order to respond to the
request.
Written Participation Agreement: The
school system administering the WSP
and each applicable employer shall
separately maintain a copy of the
written participation agreement for each
student. The written agreement shall be
signed by the teacher-coordinator, the
employer, and the student. In addition,
the student’s parent or guardian shall
either sign or otherwise provide consent
for the participation agreement to be
valid. The written participation
agreement shall be structured to ensure
that the quality of the student’s
education, as well as his or her safety
and well-being, are not compromised.
School systems, employers, and the
Department will use these records to
document the validity of the WSP and
that the 14- and 15-year-old students
were employed in accordance with the
special WSP rules.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Information Collection Burdens
Total Number of Respondents: 1530
(30 school districts and 1500
employers).
Total Number of Responses: 3030 (30
WSP applications, 1500 school district
written participation agreements, 1500
employer written participation
agreements).
Total Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden Hours: 1586.
Total Dollar Cost Burden: $14.
The DOL has slightly increased the
total burden hour estimate from 1585
hours to 1586 to align the data with
what appears in the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Information
Service Center and the OMB, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
Combined Information System (ROCIS)
used to track the burdens imposed by
Federal government information
collections. This difference is due to
differences in how initial Departmental
efforts and ROCIS dealt with rounding
issues. The Department has also
increased the dollar cost from $13 to
$14 to account for increased postage
costs since publication of the NPRM.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
V. Executive Order 12866; Regulatory
Flexibility
This Final Rule is being treated as a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ within
the meaning of E.O. 12866 because of its
importance to the public and the
Department’s priorities. Therefore, the
Office of Management and Budget has
reviewed this rule. However, because
this rule is not ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined in section 3(f)(1)
of E.O. 12866, it does not require a full
economic impact analysis under section
6(a)(3)(C) of the Order. The new
information collection, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements subject to
the PRA being imposed with the
enactment of the new work-study
program are discussed above.
It is well established that several
characteristics of youth place adolescent
workers at increased risk of injury and
death. Lack of experience in the work
place and in assessing risks, and
developmental factors—physical,
cognitive, and psychological—all
contribute to the higher rates of
occupational injuries and deaths
experienced by young workers. CFOI
data reflect that during the period of
1994–2004, 15-year-olds experienced an
occupational fatality rate of 4.7 fatalities
per 100,000 workers—a rate that was
greater than that experienced by all
workers aged 15 and older. Older
working youth share similar risks. The
NIOSH Report notes that the fatality rate
for adolescents aged 16 and 17 was 5.1
per 100,000 full-time equivalent
workers for the 10-year period 1980–89
[Castillo et al. 1994], while the rate for
adults aged 18 and older was 6.1. As
NIOSH stated, ‘‘[t]his relatively small
difference in rates is cause for concern
because youth under age 18 are
employed less frequently in especially
hazardous jobs.’’ NIOSH reports on its
Web site (see https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
topics/youth) that in 2007, an estimated
48,600 work-related injuries and
illnesses among youth 15 to 17 years of
age were treated in hospital emergency
departments. As an estimated one-third
of work-related injuries are seen in
emergency departments, it is likely that
approximately 146,000 youth sustain
work-related injuries and illnesses each
year. The NIOSH statistics show that,
despite the fact that workers aged 15
through 17 are generally restricted from
employment in hazardous occupations
such as mining, motor-vehicle driving,
logging, sawmilling, and construction,
they have a higher rate of injuries
requiring emergency room treatment
than any other age group except 18- and
19-year-olds (who are not restricted
from performing such work). The
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
economic and social costs associated
with the deaths and serious injuries of
young workers are substantial.
The Department considers the
issuance of this rule to be an important
and necessary step in its ongoing review
of the criteria for permissible child labor
employment, a review which strives to
balance the potential benefits of
transitional, staged employment
opportunities for youth with the
necessary protections for their
education, health and safety. Because
youth often overcome the effects of
those characteristics that initially place
them at increased risk of injury and
death in the workplace only through the
maturation process, it is believed that
requiring older workers to perform those
tasks that present greater risks to
younger workers actually eliminates
injuries and deaths—rather than
delaying them or transferring them to
the older workers.
Additionally, this document revises
the child labor regulations in response
to a statutory amendment enacted by the
Congress that permits certain youth
between 14 and 18 years of age who are
excused from compulsory school
attendance beyond the eighth grade to
be employed under specific conditions
inside and outside places of business
that use machinery to process wood
products. Affecting the Reg. 3
occupations standards and both HOs 4
and 5, this statutory provision would be
available to a very small number of
minors and therefore is expected to have
little or no economic impact. The
Department believes that only a few
minors have obtained employment in
such occupations since the amendment
was enacted and doubts that the number
will increase. Moreover, the
amendment’s strong safety-affecting
requirements that such youth not
operate or assist in the operation of
power-driven woodworking machines,
use personal protective equipment to
prevent exposure to excessive levels of
noise and sawdust, and be protected
from wood particles and other flying
debris within the workplace, should
significantly reduce potential costs
resulting from accidents and injuries to
minors on the job.
The implementation of revised
subpart G of the child labor regulations,
General Statements of Interpretation of
the Child Labor Provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938, as
Amended, to incorporate all the changes
made by the agency since this subpart
was last revised in 1971, will simply
provide compliance guidance on the
child labor provisions detailed in earlier
subparts of 570 and therefore imposes
no economic costs.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
The additional changes being
implemented are also expected to have
little or no direct cost impact. The
changes affecting the types of
occupations and industries in which 14and 15-year-olds may or may not be
employed, as well as the periods and
conditions of such employment (Reg. 3
occupations and hours standards), are
largely clarifications of existing
provisions or enforcement positions,
though new occupations involving work
of an intellectual or creative nature,
lifeguarding, and the loading of personal
hand tools onto motor vehicles, are
being added to the list of permitted
occupations. The revision of several of
the nonagricultural HOs—implementing
specific recommendations made by
NIOSH or that arise from the
Department’s enforcement experience—
will, in all but one instance involving
the use of certain counter-top mixers
(HO 11), require employers to assign
older workers to perform tasks that
previously may have been performed by
16- and 17-year-olds.
Revisions resulting from the NIOSH
recommendations include the
expansion of HO 4 to prohibit the
employment of minors in forest fire
fighting and fire prevention activities
and in timber tract and forestry service
occupations; the revision of HO 7 to
prohibit the employment of minors in
the tending, servicing, and repairing of
hoisting equipment and the addition of
such equipment as cherry pickers,
scissor lifts, bucket trucks, aerial
platforms, and hoists of less than one
ton capacity to the list of prohibited
equipment; and the expansion of HO 10
to prohibit the employment of minors in
poultry slaughtering and processing
occupations. Revisions to HO 12 to
prohibit the employment of minors in
the operation of balers and compactors
not currently covered by the HO, and
the expansion of HO 14 to add
additional power-driven equipment to
the list of equipment minors may not
operate, are also the result of NIOSH
Report recommendations. The
Department’s enforcement experience
led it to incorporate into the regulations
certain long-standing enforcement
positions involving the definitions of
remanufacturing departments of
sawmills (HO 4), high-lift trucks (HO 7),
and the cleaning of power-driven meat
processing equipment (HO 10). The
Department is also, based on its
enforcement experience, amending HO
11 to incorporate the Department’s longstanding position permitting 16- and 17year-olds, under certain conditions, to
operate certain pizza-dough rollers, and
expanding HO 14 to prohibit the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
employment of minors to operate wood
chippers and reciprocating saws.
The Department has incorporated
certain provisions of the Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination Act of
2008 (GINA) into 29 CFR parts 570 and
579 to implement the legislation, which
revised the civil monetary penalties that
may be assessed under section 16(e) of
the FLSA. The regulatory changes that
implement these statutory changes do
no more than conform the previouslyexisting regulations to the recent
statutory amendments and do not
impose any economic costs on
employers that are required to comply
with the provisions of sections 12 and
13(c) of the FLSA. GINA, effective May
21, 2008, increased the maximum civil
money penalty that may be assessed for
violations that cause the death or
serious injury of a minor from $11,000
to $50,000. GINA also permits a
doubling of the civil money penalty up
to $100,000 when such violations are
determined to be willful or repeated.
The Department believes that
implementation of the Final Rule would
not reduce the overall number of safe,
positive, and legal employment
opportunities available to young
workers. In fact, employment
opportunities for 14- and 15-year-olds
would increase with creation, for
example, of a limited exemption for
certain work-study programs, allowing
youth to be employed in work of an
intellectual or creative nature, and
allowing youth to be employed in those
permitted occupations listed in
§ 570.34(a) to be performed in
additional industries, rather than just in
retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishments.
Although, as mentioned above, some
employers would need to replace
younger workers with older workers, the
impact would be minimal as relatively
few minors are currently employed to
perform these occupations. But the
Department believes that these changes
are important as they are essential to
fulfilling its charge of keeping working
youth safe by prohibiting occupations
that are particularly hazardous or
detrimental to their health or wellbeing. Any costs that might result from
using older employees to perform the
previously permitted tasks would be
more than offset by reduced health and
productivity costs resulting from
accidents and injuries to minors on the
job. Rules that limit permissible job
activities for working youth to those that
are safe do not, by themselves, impose
significant added costs on employers, in
our view. In fact, ensuring that
permissible job opportunities for
working youth are safe, healthy, and not
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28447
detrimental to their education, as
required by the statute, produces many
positive benefits in addition to fewer
occupational injuries and deaths,
including reduced health and
productivity costs that employers may
otherwise incur because of higher
accident and injury rates to young and
inexperienced workers. In any event,
the direct, incremental costs that would
be imposed by this rule are expected to
be minimal. Collectively, they would
not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy or its individual sectors,
productivity, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or state, local, or
tribal governments or communities.
Therefore, this rule is not ‘‘economically
significant’’ and no regulatory impact
analysis has been prepared.
The Department has similarly
concluded for the same reasons noted
above that this rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.). It would not likely
result in: (1) An annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; (2) a
major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; or (3)
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic or export markets.
While the impact that these regulatory
changes will have on most affected
entities has already been discussed,
even those entities that are most heavily
impacted should each spend an average
of less than $1500 to comply with the
new requirements of this rule.
Specifically, the Department believes
school districts sponsoring a WSP will
incur the greatest additional costs. An
analysis of the time it will take to
prepare the application and written
training agreements for a WSP and the
associated recordkeeping suggests these
educational institutions will each spend
an average of about 52.5 hours more to
comply with this Final Rule than might
otherwise be spent to establish a similar
work-study program. The Department
associates no additional costs for the
workplace observation requirement to
ensure compliance with the FLSA child
labor provisions, because such
monitoring will normally be conducted
when school staff visit the workplace to
see whether educational objectives are
being met. Absent any specific data on
compensation of the persons who will
actually perform the work to ensure
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28448
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
compliance, the DOL has estimated
hourly costs this rule will impose on
WSP sponsor schools by increasing the
October 2009 average annual hourly rate
for production or nonsupervisory
workers on educational and health
services payrolls of $19.59 by 40 percent
to account for the value of fringe
benefits (see The Employment Situation:
December 2009, DOL, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, January 2010, Table B–3,
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/
archives/empsit_01082010.pdf). The
Department then multiplied this rate,
which includes fringe benefits, by 52.5
hours. Accordingly, the DOL estimates
WSP sponsor school districts will incur
an average of $1440 (rounded) in
additional compliance costs. (52.5 hours
x $19.59 hourly rate x 1.4 fringe benefits
factor.) As previously noted, the
Department expects 30 school districts
will have a WSP.
The costs imposed by this rule should
not be significant for any single entity,
and they do not affect a substantial
number of small entities in a way that
would require an analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. At the time
the NPRM was published, the
Department certified to this effect to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA).
Therefore, no Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis was required. The
Department received no comments
raising concerns about the initial
certification. For the reasons discussed
in this preamble, the Department has
similarly concluded and certified to the
SBA Office of Advocacy Chief Counsel
that this Final Rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities in
a manner that would require a Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
VI. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1532, this rule does not include any
federal mandate that may result in
excess of $100 million in expenditures
by state, local and tribal governments in
the aggregate or by the private sector.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
VII. Executive Order 13132; Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications as outlined in E.O. 13132
regarding federalism. The rule does not
have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
VIII. Executive Order 13175, Indian
Tribal Governments
This rule was reviewed under the
terms of E.O. 13175 and determined not
to have ‘‘tribal implications.’’ The rule
does not have ‘‘substantial direct effects
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes.’’ As a
result, no tribal summary impact
statement has been prepared.
IX. Effects on Families
The undersigned hereby certifies that
this rule will not adversely affect the
well-being of families, as discussed
under section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999.
X. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children
E.O. 13045, dated April 23, 1997 (62
FR 19885), applies to any rule that (1)
is determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined in E.O. 12866,
and (2) concerns an environmental
health or safety risk that the
promulgating agency has reason to
believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. This rule is not
subject to E.O. 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
E.O. 12866. In addition, although this
rule impacts the child labor provisions
of the FLSA and the employment of
adolescents and young adults, it does
not impact the environmental health or
safety risks of children.
XI. Environmental Impact Assessment
A review of this rule in accordance
with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality, 40 CFR 1500 et
seq.; and the Departmental NEPA
procedures, 29 CFR part 11, indicates
that the rule will not have a significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment. There is, thus, no
corresponding environmental
assessment or an environmental impact
statement.
XII. Executive Order 13211, Energy
Supply
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13211.
It will not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution or use
of energy.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
XIII. Executive Order 12630,
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
This rule is not subject to E.O. 12630,
because it does not involve
implementation of a policy ‘‘that has
takings implications’’ or that could
impose limitations on private property
use.
XIV. Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform Analysis
This rule was drafted and reviewed in
accordance with E.O. 12988 and will
not unduly burden the federal court
system. The rule was: (1) Reviewed to
eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities; (2) written to minimize
litigation; and (3) written to provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct
and to promote burden reduction.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 570
Child labor, Child Labor occupations,
Employment, Government,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations,
Investigations, Labor, Law enforcement,
Minimum age.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 579
Child labor, Law enforcement,
Penalties.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of
May, 2010.
Nancy J. Leppink,
Deputy Administrator, Wage and Hour
Division.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Department amends Title
29, parts 570 and 579, of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
■
PART 570—CHILD LABOR
REGULATIONS, ORDERS AND
STATEMENTS OF INTERPRETATION
1. The authority citation for part 570
subpart C is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 203(l), 212, 213(c).
2. Sections 570.31 through 570.35 are
revised to read as follows:
■
Subpart C—Employment of Minors
Between 14 and 16 Years of Age (Child
Labor Reg. 3)
Sec.
§ 570.31 Secretary’s determinations
concerning the employment of minors 14
and 15 years of age.
§ 570.32 Effect of this subpart.
§ 570.33 Occupations that are prohibited to
minors 14 and 15 years of age.
§ 570.34 Occupations that may be
performed by minors 14 and 15 years of
age.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 570.35 Hours of work and conditions of
employment permitted for minors 14 and
15 years of age.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 570.31 Secretary’s determinations
concerning the employment of minors 14
and 15 years of age.
The employment of minors between
14 and 16 years of age in the
occupations, for the periods, and under
the conditions specified in § 570.34 and
§ 570.35, does not interfere with their
schooling or with their health and wellbeing and shall not be deemed to be
oppressive child labor.
§ 570.32
Effect of this subpart.
This subpart concerns the
employment of youth between 14 and
16 years of age in nonagricultural
occupations; standards for the
employment of minors in agricultural
occupations are detailed in subpart E–
1. The employment (including suffering
or permitting to work) by an employer
of minors 14 and 15 years of age in
occupations detailed in § 570.34, for the
periods and under the conditions
specified in § 570.35, shall not be
deemed to be oppressive child labor
within the meaning of the Fair Labor
Standards Act of 1938, as amended.
Employment that is not specifically
permitted is prohibited.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 570.33 Occupations that are prohibited
to minors 14 and 15 years of age.
The following occupations, which is
not an exhaustive list, constitute
oppressive child labor within the
meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act
when performed by minors who are 14
and 15 years of age:
(a) Manufacturing, mining, or
processing occupations, including
occupations requiring the performance
of any duties in work rooms or work
places where goods are manufactured,
mined or otherwise processed, except as
permitted in § 570.34 of this subpart.
(b) Occupations that the Secretary of
Labor may, pursuant to section 3(l) of
the Fair Labor Standards Act, find and
declare to be hazardous for the
employment of minors between 16 and
18 years of age or detrimental to their
health or well-being.
(c) Occupations that involve
operating, tending, setting up, adjusting,
cleaning, oiling, or repairing hoisting
apparatus.
(d) Work performed in or about boiler
or engine rooms or in connection with
the maintenance or repair of the
establishment, machines, or equipment.
(e) Occupations that involve
operating, tending, setting up, adjusting,
cleaning, oiling, or repairing any powerdriven machinery, including but not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
limited to lawn mowers, golf carts, allterrain vehicles, trimmers, cutters,
weed-eaters, edgers, food slicers, food
grinders, food choppers, food
processors, food cutters, and food
mixers. Youth 14 and 15 years of age
may, however, operate office equipment
pursuant to § 570.34(a) and vacuum
cleaners and floor waxers pursuant to
§ 570.34(h).
(f) The operation of motor vehicles;
the service as helpers on such vehicles
except those tasks permitted by
§ 570.34(k); and the riding on a motor
vehicle, inside or outside of an enclosed
passenger compartment, except as
permitted by § 570.34(o).
(g) Outside window washing that
involves working from window sills,
and all work requiring the use of
ladders, scaffolds, or their substitutes.
(h) All baking and cooking activities
except that cooking which is permitted
by § 570.34(c).
(i) Work in freezers and meat coolers
and all work in the preparation of meats
for sale except as permitted by
§ 570.34(j). This section, however, does
not prohibit the employment of 14- and
15-year-olds whose duties require them
to occasionally enter freezers only
momentarily to retrieve items as
permitted by § 570.34(i).
(j) Youth peddling, which entails the
selling of goods or services to customers
at locations other than the youthemployer’s establishment, such as the
customers’ residences or places of
business, or public places such as street
corners and public transportation
stations. Prohibited activities associated
with youth peddling not only include
the attempt to make a sale or the actual
consummation of a sale, but also the
preparatory and concluding tasks
normally performed by a youth peddler
in conjunction with his or her sales
such as the loading and unloading of
vans or other motor vehicles, the
stocking and restocking of sales kits and
trays, the exchanging of cash and checks
with the employer, and the
transportation of minors to and from the
various sales areas by the employer.
Prohibited youth peddling also includes
such promotion activities as the
holding, wearing, or waving of signs,
merchandise, costumes, sandwich
boards, or placards in order to attract
potential customers, except when
performed inside of, or directly in front
of, the employer’s establishment
providing the product, service, or event
being advertised. This provision does
not prohibit a young salesperson from
conducting sales for his or her employer
on property controlled by the employer
that is out of doors but may properly be
considered part of the employer’s
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28449
establishment. Youth may conduct sales
in such employer exterior facilities,
whether temporary or permanent, as
garden centers, sidewalk sales, and
parking lot sales, when employed by
that establishment. Youth peddling does
not include the activities of persons
who, as volunteers and without
compensation, sell goods or services on
behalf of eleemosynary organizations or
public agencies.
(k) Loading and unloading of goods or
property onto or from motor vehicles,
railroad cars, or conveyors, except the
loading and unloading of personal nonpower-driven hand tools, personal
protective equipment, and personal
items to and from motor vehicles as
permitted by § 570.34(k).
(l) Catching and cooping of poultry in
preparation for transport or for market.
(m) Public messenger service.
(n) Occupations in connection with:
(1) Transportation of persons or
property by rail, highway, air, water,
pipeline, or other means;
(2) Warehousing and storage;
(3) Communications and public
utilities;
(4) Construction (including
demolition and repair); except such
office work (including ticket office) or
sales work in connection with
paragraphs (n)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of this
section, as does not involve the
performance of any duties on trains,
motor vehicles, aircraft, vessels, or other
media of transportation or at the actual
site of construction operations.
§ 570.34 Occupations that may be
performed by minors 14 and 15 years of
age.
This subpart authorizes only the
following occupations in which the
employment of minors 14 and 15 years
of age is permitted when performed for
periods and under conditions
authorized by § 570.35 and not
involving occupations prohibited by
§ 570.33 or performed in areas or
industries prohibited by § 570.33.
(a) Office and clerical work, including
the operation of office machines.
(b) Work of an intellectual or
artistically creative nature such as, but
not limited to, computer programming,
the writing of software, teaching or
performing as a tutor, serving as a peer
counselor or teacher’s assistant, singing,
the playing of a musical instrument, and
drawing, as long as such employment
complies with all the other provisions
contained in §§ 570.33, 570.34, and
570.35. Artistically creative work is
limited to work in a recognized field of
artistic or creative endeavor.
(c) Cooking with electric or gas grills
which does not involve cooking over an
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28450
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
open flame (Note: This provision does
not authorize cooking with equipment
such as rotisseries, broilers, pressurized
equipment including fryolators, and
cooking devices that operate at
extremely high temperatures such as
‘‘Neico broilers’’). Cooking is also
permitted with deep fryers that are
equipped with and utilize a device
which automatically lowers the baskets
into the hot oil or grease and
automatically raises the baskets from the
hot oil or grease.
(d) Cashiering, selling, modeling, art
work, work in advertising departments,
window trimming, and comparative
shopping.
(e) Price marking and tagging by hand
or machine, assembling orders, packing,
and shelving.
(f) Bagging and carrying out
customers’ orders.
(g) Errand and delivery work by foot,
bicycle, and public transportation.
(h) Clean up work, including the use
of vacuum cleaners and floor waxers,
and the maintenance of grounds, but not
including the use of power-driven
mowers, cutters, trimmers, edgers, or
similar equipment.
(i) Kitchen work and other work
involved in preparing and serving food
and beverages, including operating
machines and devices used in
performing such work. Examples of
permitted machines and devices
include, but are not limited to,
dishwashers, toasters, dumbwaiters,
popcorn poppers, milk shake blenders,
coffee grinders, automatic coffee
machines, devices used to maintain the
temperature of prepared foods (such as
warmers, steam tables, and heat lamps),
and microwave ovens that are used only
to warm prepared food and do not have
the capacity to warm above 140 °F.
Minors are permitted to clean kitchen
equipment (not otherwise prohibited),
remove oil or grease filters, pour oil or
grease through filters, and move
receptacles containing hot grease or hot
oil, but only when the equipment,
surfaces, containers and liquids do not
exceed a temperature of 100 °F. Minors
are also permitted to occasionally enter
freezers momentarily to retrieve items in
conjunction with restocking or food
preparation.
(j) Cleaning vegetables and fruits, and
the wrapping, sealing, labeling,
weighing, pricing, and stocking of items,
including vegetables, fruits, and meats,
when performed in areas physically
separate from a freezer or meat cooler.
(k) The loading onto motor vehicles
and the unloading from motor vehicles
of the light, non-power-driven, hand
tools and personal protective equipment
that the minor will use as part of his or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
her employment at the work site; and
the loading onto motor vehicles and the
unloading from motor vehicles of
personal items such as a back pack, a
lunch box, or a coat that the minor is
permitted to take to the work site. Such
light tools would include, but are not
limited to, rakes, hand-held clippers,
shovels, and brooms. Such light tools
would not include items like trash, sales
kits, promotion items or items for sale,
lawn mowers, or other power-driven
lawn maintenance equipment. Such
minors would not be permitted to load
or unload safety equipment such as
barriers, cones, or signage.
(l)(1) Lifeguard. The employment of
15-year-olds (but not 14-year-olds) to
perform permitted lifeguard duties at
traditional swimming pools and water
amusement parks (including such water
park facilities as wave pools, lazy rivers,
specialized activity areas that may
include water falls and sprinkler areas,
and baby pools; but not including the
elevated areas of power-driven water
slides) when such youth have been
trained and certified by the American
Red Cross, or a similar certifying
organization, in aquatics and water
safety.
(2) Definitions. As used in this
paragraph (l):
Permitted lifeguard duties include the
rescuing of swimmers in danger of
drowning, the monitoring of activities at
poolside to prevent accidents, the
teaching of water safety, and providing
assistance to patrons. Lifeguards may
also help to maintain order and
cleanliness in the pool and pool areas,
give swimming instructions (if, in
addition to being certified as a lifeguard,
the 15-year-old is also properly certified
as a swimming instructor by the
American Red Cross or some other
recognized certifying organization),
conduct or officiate at swimming meets,
and administer first aid. Additional
lifeguard duties may include checking
in and out items such as towels and
personal items such as rings, watches
and apparel. Permitted duties for 15year-olds include the use of a ladder to
access and descend from the lifeguard
chair; the use of hand tools to clean the
pool and pool area; and the testing and
recording of water quality for
temperature and/or pH levels, using all
of the tools of the testing process
including adding chemicals to the test
water sample. Fifteen-year-olds
employed as lifeguards are, however,
prohibited from entering or working in
any mechanical room or chemical
storage areas, including any areas where
the filtration and chlorinating systems
are housed. The term permitted
lifeguard duties does not include the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
operation or tending of power-driven
equipment including power-driven
elevated water slides often found at
water amusement parks and some
swimming pools. Minors under 16 years
of age may not be employed as
dispatchers or attendants at the top of
elevated water slides performing such
tasks as maintaining order, directing
patrons as to when to depart the top of
the slide, and ensuring that patrons
have begun their ‘‘ride’’ safely. Properly
certified 15-year-old lifeguards may,
however, be stationed at the
‘‘splashdown pools’’ located at the
bottom of the elevated water slides to
perform those permitted duties listed in
this subsection.
Traditional swimming pool means a
water tight structure of concrete,
masonry, or other approved materials
located either indoors or outdoors, used
for bathing or swimming and filled with
a filtered and disinfected water supply,
together with buildings, appurtenances
and equipment used in connection
therewith, excluding elevated ‘‘water
slides.’’ Not included in the definition of
a traditional swimming pool would be
such natural environment swimming
facilities as rivers, streams, lakes, ponds,
quarries, reservoirs, wharfs, piers,
canals, or oceanside beaches.
Water amusement park means an
establishment that not only
encompasses the features of a traditional
swimming pool, but may also include
such additional attractions as wave
pools; lazy rivers; specialized activities
areas such as baby pools, water falls,
and sprinklers; and elevated water
slides. Not included in the definition of
a water amusement park would be such
natural environment swimming
facilities as rivers, streams, lakes,
reservoirs, wharfs, piers, canals, or
oceanside beaches.
(m)(1) Employment inside and outside
of places of business where machinery
is used to process wood products. The
employment of a 14- or 15-year-old who
by statute or judicial order is exempt
from compulsory school attendance
beyond the eighth grade inside or
outside places of business where
machinery is used to process wood
products if:
(i) The youth is supervised by an
adult relative of the youth or is
supervised by an adult member of the
same religious sect or division as the
youth;
(ii) The youth does not operate or
assist in the operation of power-driven
woodworking machines;
(iii) The youth is protected from wood
particles or other flying debris within
the workplace by a barrier appropriate
to the potential hazard of such wood
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
particles or flying debris or by
maintaining a sufficient distance from
machinery in operation; and
(iv) The youth is required to use, and
uses, personal protective equipment to
prevent exposure to excessive levels of
noise and saw dust.
(2) Compliance. Compliance with the
provisions of paragraphs (m)(1)(iii) and
(m)(1)(iv) of this section will be
accomplished when the employer is in
compliance with the requirements of the
applicable governing standards issued
by the U.S. Department of Labor’s
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) or, in those
areas where OSHA has authorized the
state to operate its own Occupational
Safety and Health Plan, the applicable
standards issued by the Office charged
with administering the State
Occupational Safety and Health Plan.
The employment of youth under this
section must comply with the other
sections of this subpart, including the
hours and time of day standards
established by § 570.35.
(3) Definitions. As used in this
paragraph (m):
Inside or outside places of business
shall mean the actual physical location
of the establishment employing the
youth, including the buildings and
surrounding land necessary to the
business operations of that
establishment.
Operate or assist in the operation of
power-driven woodworking machines
shall mean the operating of such
machines, including supervising or
controlling the operation of such
machines, feeding material into such
machines, helping the operator feed
material into such machines, unloading
materials from such machines, and
helping the operator unload materials
from such machines. The term also
includes the occupations of setting-up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
such machines.
Places of business where machinery is
used to process wood products shall
mean such permanent workplaces as
sawmills, lath mills, shingle mills,
cooperage stock mills, furniture and
cabinet making shops, gazebo and shed
making shops, toy manufacturing shops,
and pallet shops. The term shall not
include construction sites, portable
sawmills, areas where logging is being
performed, or mining operations.
Power-driven woodworking machines
shall mean all fixed or portable
machines or tools driven by power and
used or designed for cutting, shaping,
forming, surfacing, nailing, stapling,
wire stitching, fastening or otherwise
assembling, pressing, or printing wood,
veneer, trees, logs, or lumber.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Supervised by an adult relative or is
supervised by an adult member of the
same religious sect or division as the
youth has several components.
Supervised means that the youth’s onthe-job activities must be directed,
monitored, overseen, and controlled by
certain named adults. Such supervision
must be close, direct, constant, and
uninterrupted. An adult shall mean an
individual who is at least eighteen years
of age. A relative shall mean the parent
(or someone standing in the place of a
parent), grandparent, sibling, uncle, or
aunt of the young worker. A member of
the same religious sect or division as the
youth refers to an individual who
professes membership in the same
religious sect or division to which the
youth professes membership.
(n) Work in connection with cars and
trucks if confined to the following:
dispensing gasoline and oil; courtesy
service; car cleaning, washing and
polishing by hand; and other
occupations permitted by this section,
but not including work involving the
use of pits, racks, or lifting apparatus, or
involving the inflation of any tire
mounted on a rim equipped with a
removable retaining ring.
(o) Work in connection with riding
inside passenger compartments of motor
vehicles except as prohibited by
§ 570.33(f) or § 570.33(j), or when a
significant reason for the minor being a
passenger in the vehicle is for the
purpose of performing work in
connection with the transporting—or
assisting in the transporting of—other
persons or property. The transportation
of the persons or property does not have
to be the primary reason for the trip for
this exception to apply. Each minor
riding as a passenger in a motor vehicle
must have his or her own seat in the
passenger compartment; each seat must
be equipped with a seat belt or similar
restraining device; and the employer
must instruct the minors that such belts
or other devices must be used. In
addition, each driver transporting the
young workers must hold a State
driver’s license valid for the type of
driving involved and, if the driver is
under the age of 18, his or her
employment must comply with the
provisions of § 570.52.
§ 570.35 Hours of work and conditions of
employment permitted for minors 14 and 15
years of age.
(a) Hours standards. Except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this
section, employment in any of the
permissible occupations to which this
subpart is applicable shall be confined
to the following periods:
(1) Outside of school hours;
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28451
(2) Not more than 40 hours in any 1
week when school is not in session;
(3) Not more than 18 hours in any 1
week when school is in session;
(4) Not more than 8 hours in any 1
day when school is not in session;
(5) Not more than 3 hours in any 1
day when school is in session, including
Fridays;
(6) Between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. in any
1 day, except during the summer (June
1 through Labor Day) when the evening
hour will be 9 p.m.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Outside school hours means such
periods as before and after school hours,
holidays, summer vacations, weekends,
and any other day or part of a day when
school is not in session as determined
by the local public school district in
which the minor resides when
employed. Summer school sessions,
held in addition to the regularly
scheduled school year, are considered to
be outside of school hours.
School hours refers to the hours that
the local public school district where
the minor resides while employed is in
session during the regularly scheduled
school year.
Week means a fixed and regularly
recurring period of 168 hours—seven
consecutive 24-hour periods—that is
identical to the workweek the employer
establishes for the employee under
§ 778.105 of this title.
Week when school is in session refers
to any week the local public school
district where the minor resides while
employed is in session and students are
required to attend for at least one day
or partial day.
(c) Exceptions. (1) School is not
considered to be in session, and
exceptions from the hours limitations
standards listed in paragraphs (a)(1), (3),
and (5) of this section are provided, for
any youth 14 or 15 years of age who:
(i) Has graduated from high school;
(ii) Has been excused from
compulsory school attendance by the
state or other jurisdiction once he or she
has completed the eighth grade and his
or her employment complies with all
the requirements of the state school
attendance law;
(iii) Has a child to support and
appropriate state officers, pursuant to
state law, have waived school
attendance requirements for this minor;
(iv) Is subject to an order of a state or
federal court prohibiting him or her
from attending school; or
(v) Has been permanently expelled
from the local public school he or she
would normally attend, unless the
youth is required, by state or local law
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28452
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
or ordinance, or by court order, to
attend another school.
(2) In the case of minors 14 and 15
years of age who are employed to
perform sports-attending services at
professional sporting events, i.e.,
baseball, basketball, football, soccer,
tennis, etc., the requirements of
paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(6) of this
section shall not apply, provided that
the duties of the sports-attendant
occupation consist of pre- and postgame or practice setup of balls, items
and equipment; supplying and
retrieving balls, items and equipment
during a sporting event; clearing the
field or court of debris, moisture, etc.,
during play; providing ice, drinks,
towels, etc., to players during play;
running errands for trainers, managers,
coaches, and players before, during, and
after a sporting event; and returning
and/or storing balls, items and
equipment in club house or locker room
after a sporting event. For purposes of
this exception, impermissible duties
include grounds or field maintenance
such as grass mowing, spreading or
rolling tarpaulins used to cover playing
areas, etc.; cleaning and repairing
equipment; cleaning locker rooms,
showers, lavatories, rest rooms, team
vehicles, club houses, dugouts or
similar facilities; loading and unloading
balls, items and equipment from team
vehicles before and after a sporting
event; doing laundry; and working in
concession stands or other selling and
promotional activities.
(3) Exceptions from certain of the
hours standards contained in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(3) of this
section are provided for the
employment of minors who are enrolled
in and employed pursuant to a schoolsupervised work-experience and career
exploration program as detailed in
§ 570.36.
(4) Exceptions from certain of the
hours standards contained in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(5) of this
section are provided for the
employment of minors who are
participating in a work-study program
designed as described in § 570.37.
§§ 570.36 and 570.37 [Redesignated as
§§ 570.38 and 570.39]
3. Redesignate §§ 570.36 and 570.37
as §§ 570.38 and 570.39, respectively.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
■
§ 570.35a
■
[Redesignated as § 570.36]
4. Redesignate § 570.35a as § 570.36.
5. Revise paragraph (c)(3) introductory
text of newly redesignated § 570.36 to
read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 570.36 Work experience and career
exploration program.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Occupations other than those
permitted under § 570.34, except upon
approval of a variation by the
Administrator of the Wage and Hour
Division in acting on the program
application of the State Educational
Agency. The Administrator shall have
discretion to grant requests for special
variations if the applicant demonstrates
that the activity will be performed
under adequate supervision and training
(including safety precautions) and that
the terms and conditions of the
proposed employment will not interfere
with the health or well-being or
schooling of the minor enrolled in an
approved program. The granting of a
special variation is determined on a
case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Add a new § 570.37 to read as
follows:
§ 570.37
Work-study program.
(a) This section varies the provisions
contained in § 570.35(a)(1) and (a)(5) for
the employment of minors 14 and 15
years of age who are enrolled in and
employed pursuant to a schoolsupervised and school-administered
work-study program that meets the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section, in the occupations permitted by
§ 570.34, and for the periods and under
the conditions specified in paragraph (c)
of this section. With these safeguards,
such employment is found not to
interfere with the schooling of the
minors or with their health and wellbeing and therefore is not deemed to be
oppressive child labor.
(b)(1) A school-supervised and
school-administered work-study
program shall meet the educational
standards established and approved by
the State Educational Agency in the
respective state.
(2) The superintendent of the public
or private school system supervising
and administering the work-study
program shall file with the
Administrator of the Wage and Hour
Division a letter of application for
approval of the work-study program as
one not interfering with schooling or
with the health and well-being of the
minors involved and therefore not
constituting oppressive child labor. The
application shall be filed at least sixty
days before the start of the school year
and must include information
concerning the criteria listed in
paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The
Administrator of the Wage and Hour
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Division shall approve the application,
or give prompt notice of any denial and
the reasons therefor.
(3) The criteria to be used in
consideration of applications under this
section are the following:
(i) Eligibility. Any student 14 or 15
years of age, enrolled in a college
preparatory curriculum, whom
authoritative personnel from the school
attended by the youth identify as being
able to benefit from the program shall be
able to participate.
(ii) Instructional schedule. Every
youth shall receive, every school year he
or she participates in the work-study
program, at least the minimum number
of hours of classroom instruction, as
required by the State Educational
Agency responsible for establishing
such standards, to complete a fullyaccredited college preparatory
curriculum. Such classroom instruction
shall include, every year the youth
participates in the work-study program,
training in workplace safety and state
and federal child labor provisions and
rules.
(iii) Teacher-coordinator. Each school
participating in a work-study program
shall designate a teacher-coordinator
under whose supervision the program
will operate. The teacher-coordinator
shall generally supervise and coordinate
the work and educational aspects of the
program and make regularly scheduled
visits to the workplaces of the
participating students to confirm that
minors participating in the work-study
program are employed in compliance
with all applicable provisions of this
part and section 6 of the Fair Labor
Standards Act. Such confirmation shall
be noted in any letters of application
filed by the superintendent of the public
or private school system in accordance
with paragraph (b)(2) of this section
when seeking continuance of its workstudy program.
(iv) Written participation agreement.
No student shall participate in the workstudy program until there has been
made a written agreement signed by the
teacher-coordinator, the employer, and
the student. The agreement shall also be
signed or otherwise consented to by the
student’s parent or guardian. The
agreement shall detail the objectives of
the work-study program; describe the
specific job duties to be performed by
the participating minor as well as the
number of hours and times of day that
the minor will be employed each week;
affirm that the participant will receive
the minimum number of hours of classroom instruction as required by the
State Educational Agency for the
completion of a fully-accredited college
preparatory curriculum; and affirm that
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the employment of the minor will be in
compliance with the child labor
provisions of both this part and the laws
of the state where the work will be
performed, and the applicable minimum
wage provisions contained in section 6
of the FLSA.
(v) Other provisions. Any other
provisions of the program providing
safeguards ensuring that the
employment permitted under this
section will not interfere with the
schooling of the minors or with their
health and well-being may also be
submitted for use in considering the
application.
(4) Every public or private school
district having students in a work-study
program approved pursuant to these
requirements, and every employer
employing students in a work-study
program approved pursuant to these
requirements, shall comply with the
following:
(i) Permissible occupations. No
student shall be assigned to work in any
occupation other than one permitted
under § 570.34.
(ii) Records and reports. A copy of the
written agreement for each student
participating in the work-study program
shall be kept by both the employer and
the school supervising and
administering the program for a period
of three years from the date of the
student’s enrollment in the program.
Such agreements shall be made
available upon request to the
representatives of the Administrator of
the Wage and Hour Division for
inspection, transcription, and/or
photocopying.
(c) Employment of minors enrolled in
a program approved pursuant to the
requirements of this section shall be
confined to not more than 18 hours in
any one week when school is in session,
a portion of which may be during school
hours, in accordance with the following
formula that is based upon a continuous
four-week cycle. In three of the four
weeks, the participant is permitted to
work during school hours on only one
day per week, and for no more than for
eight hours on that day. During the
remaining week of the four-week cycle,
such minor is permitted to work during
school hours on no more than two days,
and for no more than for eight hours on
each of those two days. The
employment of such minors would still
be subject to the time of day and
number of hours standards contained in
§§ 570.35(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(6).
To the extent that these provisions are
inconsistent with the provisions of
§ 570.35, this section shall be
controlling.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
(d) Programs shall be in force and
effect for a period to be determined by
the Administrator of the Wage and Hour
Division, but in no case shall be in effect
for longer than two school years from
the date of their approval by the
Administrator of the Wage and Hour
Division. A new application for
approval must be filed at the end of that
period. Failure to meet the requirements
of this section may result in withdrawal
of the approval.
(The information collection
requirements contained in § 570.37 were
approved by the OMB under Control
No. 1215–0208.)
Subpart E—Occupations Particularly
Hazardous for the Employment of
Minors Between 16 and 18 Years of
Age or Detrimental to Their Health or
Well-Being
7. The authority citation for subpart E
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 203(l), 212, 213(c).
8. Section 570.54 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 570.54 Forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention occupations, timber tract
occupations, forestry service occupations,
logging occupations, and occupations in
the operation of any sawmill, lath mill,
shingle mill, or cooperage stock mill (Order
4).
(a) Finding and declarations of fact.
All occupations in forest fire fighting
and forest fire prevention, in timber
tracts, in forestry services, logging, and
the operation of any sawmill, lath mill,
shingle mill, or cooperage stock mill are
particularly hazardous for the
employment of minors between 16 and
18 years of age, except the following
when not prohibited by any other
section of this subpart:
(1) Work in offices or in repair or
maintenance shops.
(2) Work in the construction,
operation, repair, or maintenance of
living and administrative quarters,
including logging camps and fire
fighting base camps.
(3) Work in the repair or maintenance
of roads, railroads or flumes and work
in construction and maintenance of
telephone lines, but only if the minors
are not engaged in the operation of
power-driven machinery, the handling
or use of explosives, the felling or
bucking of timber, the collecting or
transporting of logs, or work on trestles.
(4) The following tasks in forest fire
prevention provided none of these tasks
may be performed in conjunction with
or in support of efforts to extinguish a
forest fire: the clearing of fire trails or
roads; the construction, maintenance,
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28453
and patrolling of fire lines; the piling
and burning of slash; the maintaining of
fire fighting equipment; and acting as a
fire lookout or fire patrolman.
(5) Work related to forest marketing
and forest economics when performed
away from the forest.
(6) Work in the feeding or care of
animals.
(7) Peeling of fence posts, pulpwood,
chemical wood, excelsior wood,
cordwood, or similar products, when
not done in conjunction with and at the
same time and place as other logging
occupations declared hazardous by this
section.
(8) The following additional
exceptions apply to the operation of a
permanent sawmill or the operation of
any lath mill, shingle mill, or cooperage
stock mill, but not to a portable sawmill.
In addition, the following exceptions do
not apply to work which entails
entering the sawmill building, except
for those minors whose employment
meets the requirements of the limited
exemptions discussed in §§ 570.34(m)
and 570.54(c):
(i) Straightening, marking, or tallying
lumber on the dry chain or the dry drop
sorter.
(ii) Pulling lumber from the dry chain,
except minors under 16 years of age
may not pull lumber from the dry chain
as such youth are prohibited from
operating or tending power-driven
machinery by § 570.33(e) of this part.
(iii) Clean-up in the lumberyard.
(iv) Piling, handling, or shipping of
cooperage stock in yards or storage
sheds other than operating or assisting
in the operation of power-driven
equipment; except minors under 16
years of age may not perform shipping
duties as they are prohibited from
employment in occupations in
connection with the transportation of
property by rail, highway, air, water,
pipeline, or other means by
§ 570.33(n)(1) of this part.
(v) Clerical work in yards or shipping
sheds, such as done by ordermen, tallymen, and shipping clerks.
(vi) Clean-up work outside shake and
shingle mills, except when the mill is in
operation.
(vii) Splitting shakes manually from
precut and split blocks with a froe and
mallet, except inside the mill building
or cover.
(viii) Packing shakes into bundles
when done in conjunction with splitting
shakes manually with a froe and mallet,
except inside the mill building or cover.
(ix) Manual loading of bundles of
shingles or shakes into trucks or railroad
cars, provided that the employer has on
file a statement from a licensed doctor
of medicine or osteopathy certifying the
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28454
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
minor capable of performing this work
without injury to himself, except minors
under 16 years of age may not load
bundles of shingles or shakes into trucks
or railroad cars as they are prohibited
from loading and unloading goods or
property onto or from motor vehicles,
railroad cars, or conveyors by
§ 570.33(k) of this part.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
All occupations in forest fire fighting
and forest fire prevention shall include
the controlling and extinguishing of
fires, the wetting down of areas or
extinguishing of spot fires, and the
patrolling of burned areas to assure the
fire has been extinguished. The term
shall also include the following tasks
when performed in conjunction with, or
in support of, efforts to extinguish a
forest fire: the piling and burning of
slash; the clearing of fire trails or roads;
the construction, maintenance, and
patrolling of fire lines; acting as a fire
lookout or fire patrolman; and the
maintaining of fire fighting equipment.
The prohibition concerning the
employment of youth in forest fire
fighting and fire prevention applies to
all forest and timber tract locations,
logging operations, and sawmill
operations, including all buildings
located within such areas.
All occupations in forestry services
shall mean all work involved in the
support of timber production, wood
technology, forestry economics and
marketing, and forest protection. The
term includes such services as timber
cruising, surveying, or loggingengineering parties; estimating timber;
timber valuation; forest pest control;
forest fire fighting and forest fire
prevention as defined in this section;
and reforestation. The term shall not
include work in forest nurseries,
establishments primarily engaged in
growing trees for purposes of
reforestation. The term shall not include
the gathering of forest products such as
balsam needles, ginseng, huckleberry
greens, maple sap, moss, Spanish moss,
sphagnum moss, teaberries, and tree
seeds; the distillation of gum,
turpentine, and rosin if carried on at the
gum farm; and the extraction of pine
gum.
All occupations in logging shall mean
all work performed in connection with
the felling of timber; the bucking or
converting of timber into logs, poles,
piles, ties, bolts, pulpwood, chemical
wood, excelsior wood, cordwood, fence
posts, or similar products; the
collecting, skidding, yarding, loading,
transporting and unloading of such
products in connection with logging; the
constructing, repairing and maintaining
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
of roads, railroads, flumes, or camps
used in connection with logging; the
moving, installing, rigging, and
maintenance of machinery or equipment
used in logging; and other work
performed in connection with logging.
All occupations in the operation of
any sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill, or
cooperage-stock mill shall mean all
work performed in or about any such
mill in connection with storing of logs
and bolts; converting logs or bolts into
sawn lumber, lathers, shingles, or
cooperage stock; storing drying, and
shipping lumber, laths, shingles,
cooperage stock, or other products of
such mills; and other work performed in
connection with the operation of any
sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill, or
cooperage-stock mill. The term shall not
include work performed in the planingmill department or other
remanufacturing departments of any
sawmill or remanufacturing plant not a
part of a sawmill.
All occupations in timber tracts
means all work performed in or about
establishments that cultivate, manage or
sell standing timber. The term includes
work performed in timber culture,
timber tracts, timber-stand
improvement, and forest fire fighting
and fire prevention. It includes work on
tree farms, except those tree farm
establishments that meet the definition
of agriculture contained in 29 U.S.C.
203(f).
Inside or outside places of business
shall mean the actual physical location
of the establishment employing the
youth, including the buildings and
surrounding land necessary to the
business operations of that
establishment.
Operate or assist in the operation of
power-driven woodworking machines
includes operating such machines,
including supervising or controlling the
operation of such machines, feeding
material into such machines, helping
the operator feed material into such
machines, unloading materials from
such machines, and helping the
operator unload materials from such
machines. The term also includes the
occupations of setting-up, adjusting,
repairing, oiling, or cleaning such
machines.
Places of business where machinery is
used to process wood products shall
mean such permanent workplaces as
sawmills, lath mills, shingle mills,
cooperage stock mills, furniture and
cabinet making shops, gazebo and shed
making shops, toy manufacturing shops,
and pallet shops. The term shall not
include construction sites, portable
sawmills, areas where logging is being
performed, or mining operations.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Portable sawmill shall mean a
sawmilling operation where no office or
repair or maintenance shop is ordinarily
maintained, and any lumberyard
operated in conjunction with the
sawmill is used only for the temporary
storage of green lumber.
Power-driven woodworking machines
shall mean all fixed or portable
machines or tools driven by power and
used or designed for cutting, shaping,
forming, surfacing, nailing, stapling,
wire stitching, fastening or otherwise
assembling, pressing or printing wood,
veneer, trees, logs, or lumber.
Remanufacturing department shall
mean those departments of a sawmill
where lumber products such as boxes,
lawn furniture, and the like are
remanufactured from previously cut
lumber. The kind of work performed in
such departments is similar to that done
in planing mill departments in that
rough lumber is surfaced or made into
other finished products. The term is not
intended to denote those operations in
sawmills where rough lumber is cut to
dimensions.
Supervised by an adult relative or is
supervised by an adult member of the
same religious sect or division as the
youth, as a term, has several
components. Supervised refers to the
requirement that the youth’s on-the-job
activities be directed, monitored, and
controlled by certain named adults.
Such supervision must be close, direct,
constant and uninterrupted. An adult
shall mean an individual who is at least
eighteen years of age. A relative shall
mean the parent (or someone standing
in place of a parent), grandparent,
sibling, uncle, or aunt of the young
worker. A member of the same religious
sect or division as the youth refers to an
individual who professes membership
in the same religious sect or division to
which the youth professes membership.
(c) Exemptions. (1) The provisions
contained in paragraph (a)(8) of this
section that prohibit youth between 16
and 18 years of age from performing any
work that entails entering the sawmill
building do not apply to the
employment of a youth who is at least
14 years of age and less than 18 years
of age and who by statute or judicial
order is exempt from compulsory school
attendance beyond the eighth grade, if:
(i) The youth is supervised by an
adult relative or by an adult member of
the same religious sect or division as the
youth;
(ii) The youth does not operate or
assist in the operation of power-driven
woodworking machines;
(iii) The youth is protected from wood
particles or other flying debris within
the workplace by a barrier appropriate
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to the potential hazard of such wood
particles or flying debris or by
maintaining a sufficient distance from
machinery in operation; and
(iv) The youth is required to use, and
uses, personal protective equipment to
prevent exposure to excessive levels of
noise and saw dust.
(2) Compliance with the provisions of
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii) and (iv) of this
section will be accomplished when the
employer is in compliance with the
requirements of the applicable
governing standards issued by the U.S.
Department of Labor’s Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) or, in those areas where OSHA
has authorized the state to operate its
own Occupational Safety and Health
Plan, the applicable standards issued by
the Office charged with administering
the State Occupational Safety and
Health Plan.
■ 9. In § 570.55, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 570.55 Occupations involved in the
operation of power-driven woodworking
machines (Order 5).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Off-bearing shall mean the removal of
material or refuse directly from a saw
table or from the point of operation.
Operations not considered as off-bearing
within the intent of this section include:
(i) The removal of material or refuse
from a circular saw or guillotine-action
veneer clipper where the material or
refuse has been conveyed away from the
saw table or point of operation by a
gravity chute or by some mechanical
means such as a moving belt or
expulsion roller; and
(ii) The following operations when
they do not involve the removal of
materials or refuse directly from a saw
table or point of operation: The carrying,
moving, or transporting of materials
from one machine to another or from
one part of a plant to another; the piling,
stacking, or arranging of materials for
feeding into a machine by another
person; and the sorting, tying, bundling,
or loading of materials.
Power-driven woodworking machines
shall mean all fixed or portable
machines or tools driven by power and
used or designed for cutting, shaping,
forming, surfacing, nailing, stapling,
wire stitching, fastening or otherwise
assembling, pressing or printing wood,
veneer, trees, logs, or lumber.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 570.58, paragraphs (a) and (b)
are revised to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 570.58 Occupations involved in the
operation of power-driven hoisting
apparatus (Order 7).
(a) Findings and declaration of fact.
The following occupations involved in
the operation of power-driven hoisting
apparatus are particularly hazardous for
minors between 16 and 18 years of age:
(1) Work of operating, tending, riding
upon, working from, repairing,
servicing, or disassembling an elevator,
crane, derrick, hoist, or high-lift truck,
except operating or riding inside an
unattended automatic operation
passenger elevator. Tending such
equipment includes assisting in the
hoisting tasks being performed by the
equipment.
(2) Work of operating, tending, riding
upon, working from, repairing,
servicing, or disassembling a manlift or
freight elevator, except 16- and 17-yearolds may ride upon a freight elevator
operated by an assigned operator.
Tending such equipment includes
assisting in the hoisting tasks being
performed by the equipment.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Crane shall mean a power-driven
machine for lifting and lowering a load
and moving it horizontally, in which the
hoisting mechanism is an integral part
of the machine. The term shall include
all types of cranes, such as cantilever
gantry, crawler, gantry, hammerhead,
ingot pouring, jib, locomotive, motortruck, overhead traveling, pillar jib,
pintle, portal, semi-gantry, semi-portal,
storage bridge, tower, walking jib, and
wall cranes.
Derrick shall mean a power-driven
apparatus consisting of a mast or
equivalent members held at the top by
guys or braces, with or without a boom,
for use with a hoisting mechanism or
operating ropes. The term shall include
all types of derricks, such as A-frame,
breast, Chicago boom, gin-pole, guy, and
stiff-leg derrick.
Elevator shall mean any power-driven
hoisting or lowering mechanism
equipped with a car or platform which
moves in guides in a substantially
vertical direction. The term shall
include both passenger and freight
elevators (including portable elevators
or tiering machines), but shall not
include dumbwaiters.
High-lift truck shall mean a powerdriven industrial type of truck used for
lateral transportation that is equipped
with a power-operated lifting device
usually in the form of a fork or platform
capable of tiering loaded pallets or skids
one above the other. Instead of a fork or
a platform, the lifting device may
consist of a ram, scoop, shovel, crane,
revolving fork, or other attachments for
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28455
handling specific loads. The term shall
mean and include highlift trucks known
under such names as fork lifts, fork
trucks, fork lift trucks, tiering trucks,
backhoes, front-end loaders, skid
loaders, skid-steer loaders, Bobcat
loaders, or stacking trucks, but shall not
mean low-lift trucks or low-lift platform
trucks that are designed for the
transportation of but not the tiering of
materials.
Hoist shall mean a power-driven
apparatus for raising or lowering a load
by the application of a pulling force that
does not include a car or platform
running in guides. The term shall
include all types of hoists, such as base
mounted electric, clevis suspension,
hook suspension, monorail, overhead
electric, simple drum, and trolley
suspension hoists.
Manlift shall mean a device intended
for the conveyance of persons that
consists of platforms or brackets
mounted on, or attached to, an endless
belt, cable, chain or similar method of
suspension; with such belt, cable or
chain operating in a substantially
vertical direction and being supported
by and driven through pulleys, sheaves
or sprockets at the top and bottom. The
term shall also include truck- or
equipment-mounted aerial platforms
commonly referred to as scissor lifts,
boom-type mobile elevating work
platforms, work assist vehicles, cherry
pickers, basket hoists, and bucket
trucks.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 570.59, the section heading is
revised to read as follows:
§ 570.59 Occupations involved in the
operation of power-driven metal forming,
punching, and shearing machines (Order 8).
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 570.61, the section heading
and paragraphs (a)(4), (a)(7), (b), and
(c)(1) are revised to read as follows:
■
§ 570.61 Occupations in the operation of
power-driven meat-processing machines
and occupations involving slaughtering,
meat and poultry packing, processing, or
rendering (Order 10).
(a) * * *
(4) All occupations involved in the
operation or feeding of the following
power-driven machines, including
setting-up, adjusting, repairing, or oiling
such machines or the cleaning of such
machines or the individual parts or
attachments of such machines,
regardless of the product being
processed by these machines (including,
for example, the slicing in a retail
delicatessen of meat, poultry, seafood,
bread, vegetables, or cheese, etc.): meat
patty forming machines, meat and bone
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
28456
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
cutting saws, poultry scissors or shears;
meat slicers, knives (except baconslicing machines), headsplitters, and
guillotine cutters; snoutpullers and
jawpullers; skinning machines;
horizontal rotary washing machines;
casing-cleaning machines such as
crushing, stripping, and finishing
machines; grinding, mixing, chopping,
and hashing machines; and presses
(except belly-rolling machines). Except,
the provisions of this subsection shall
not apply to the operation of those
lightweight, small capacity, portable,
countertop mixers discussed in
§ 570.62(b)(1) of this chapter when used
as a mixer to process materials other
than meat or poultry.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) All occupations involving the
handlifting or handcarrying any carcass
or half carcass of beef, pork, horse, deer,
or buffalo, or any quarter carcass of beef,
horse, or buffalo.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Boning occupations means the
removal of bones from meat cuts. It does
not include work that involves cutting,
scraping, or trimming meat from cuts
containing bones.
Curing cellar includes a workroom or
workplace which is primarily devoted
to the preservation and flavoring of
meat, including poultry, by curing
materials. It does not include a
workroom or workplace solely where
meats are smoked.
Hide cellar includes a workroom or
workplace where hides are graded,
trimmed, salted, and otherwise cured.
Killing floor includes a workroom,
workplace where such animals as cattle,
calves, hogs, poultry, sheep, lambs,
goats, buffalo, deer, or horses are
immobilized, shackled, or killed, and
the carcasses are dressed prior to
chilling.
Retail/wholesale or service
establishments include establishments
where meat or meat products, including
poultry, are processed or handled, such
as butcher shops, grocery stores,
restaurants and quick service food
establishments, hotels, delicatessens,
and meat locker (freezer-locker)
companies, and establishments where
any food product is prepared or
processed for serving to customers using
machines prohibited by paragraph (a) of
this section.
Rendering plants means
establishments engaged in the
conversion of dead animals, animal
offal, animal fats, scrap meats, blood,
and bones into stock feeds, tallow,
inedible greases, fertilizer ingredients,
and similar products.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Slaughtering and meat packing
establishments means places in or about
which such animals as cattle, calves,
hogs, poultry, sheep, lambs, goats,
buffalo, deer, or horses are killed,
butchered, or processed. The term also
includes establishments which
manufacture or process meat or poultry
products, including sausage or sausage
casings from such animals.
(c) * * *
(1) The killing and processing of
rabbits or small game in areas physically
separated from the killing floor.
*
*
*
*
*
13. In § 570.62, paragraph (a)(2) is
revised, and a new paragraph (b) is
added, to read as follows:
■
§ 570.62 Occupations involved in the
operation of bakery machines (Order 11).
(a) * * *
(2) The occupation of setting up or
adjusting a cookie or cracker machine.
(b) Exceptions. (1) This section shall
not apply to the operation, including the
setting up, adjusting, repairing, oiling
and cleaning, of lightweight, small
capacity, portable counter-top powerdriven food mixers that are, or are
comparable to, models intended for
household use. For purposes of this
exemption, a lightweight, small capacity
mixer is one that is not hardwired into
the establishment’s power source, is
equipped with a motor that operates at
no more than 1⁄2 horsepower, and is
equipped with a bowl with a capacity of
no more than five quarts. Except, this
exception shall not apply when the
mixer is used, with or without
attachments, to process meat or poultry
products as prohibited by § 570.61(a)(4).
(2) This section shall not apply to the
operation of pizza-dough rollers, a type
of dough sheeter, that: have been
constructed with safeguards contained
in the basic design so as to prevent
fingers, hands, or clothing from being
caught in the in-running point of the
rollers; have gears that are completely
enclosed; and have microswitches that
disengage the machinery if the backs or
sides of the rollers are removed. This
exception applies only when all the
safeguards detailed in this paragraph are
present on the machine, are operational,
and have not been overridden. This
exception does not apply to the setting
up, adjusting, repairing, oiling or
cleaning of such pizza-dough rollers.
14. In § 570.63, the section heading
and paragraphs (a)(2), (b) are revised,
paragraphs (a)(3) and (4) are added, and
paragraph (c)(1)(iv)(A) is revised to read
as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 570.63 Occupations involved in the
operation of balers, compactors, and paperproducts machines (Order 12).
(a) * * *
(2) The occupations of operation or
assisting to operate any baler that is
designed or used to process materials
other than paper.
(3) The occupations of operation or
assisting to operate any compactor that
is designed or used to process materials
other than paper.
(4) The occupations of setting up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
any of the machines listed in paragraphs
(a)(1), (2), and (3) of this section.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Applicable ANSI Standard means the
American National Standard Institute’s
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990 American
National Standard for Refuse Collection,
Processing, and Disposal—Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements (ANSI
S245.5–1990) for scrap paper balers or
the American National Standard
Institute’s Standard ANSI Z245.2–1992
American National Standard for Refuse
Collection, Processing, and Disposal
Equipment—Stationary Compactors—
Safety Requirements (ANSI Z245.2–
1992) for paper box compactors.
Additional applicable standards are the
American National Standard Institute’s
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1997 American
National Standard for Equipment
Technology and Operations for Wastes
and Recyclable Materials—Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements (ANSI
Z245.5–1997), the American National
Standard Institute’s Standard ANSI
Z245.5–2004 American National
Standard for Equipment Technology
and Operations for Wastes and
Recyclable Materials—Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements for
Installation, Maintenance and
Operation (ANSI Z245.5–2004), and the
American National Standard Institute’s
Standard ANSI Z245.5–2008 American
National Standard for Equipment
Technology and Operations for Wastes
and Recyclable Materials—Baling
Equipment—Safety Requirements (ANSI
Z245.5–2008) for scrap paper balers or
the American National Standard
Institute’s Standard ANSI Z245.2–1997
American National Standard for
Equipment Technology and Operations
for Wastes and Recyclable Materials—
Stationary Compactors—Safety
Requirements (ANSI Z245.2–1997), the
American National Standard Institute’s
Standard ANSI Z245.2–2004 American
National Standard for Equipment
Technology and Operations for Wastes
and Recyclable Materials—Stationary
Compactors—Safety Requirements for
Installation, Maintenance and
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Operation (ANSI Z245.2–2004), and the
American National Standard Institute’s
Standard ANSI Z245.2–2008 American
National Standard for Equipment
Technology and Operations for Wastes
and Recyclable Materials—Stationary
Compactors—Safety Requirements for
Installation, Maintenance and
Operation (ANSI Z245.2–2008) for
paper box compactors, which the
Secretary has certified to be at least as
protective of the safety of minors as
Standard ANSI Z245.5–1990 for scrap
paper balers or Standard ANSI Z245.2–
1992 for paper box compactors. The
ANSI standards for scrap paper balers
and paper box compactors govern the
manufacture and modification of the
equipment, the operation and
maintenance of the equipment, and
employee training. These ANSI
standards are incorporated by reference
in this paragraph and have the same
force and effect as other standards in
this part. Only the mandatory
provisions (i.e., provisions containing
the word ‘‘shall’’ or other mandatory
language) of these standards are adopted
as standards under this part. These
standards are incorporated by reference
as they exist on the date of the approval;
if any changes are made in these
standards which the Secretary finds to
be as protective of the safety of minors
as the current standards, the Secretary
will publish a Notice of the change of
standards in the Federal Register. These
incorporations by reference were
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of
these standards are available for
purchase from the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 West
43rd St., Fourth Floor, New York, NY
10036. The telephone number for ANSI
is (212) 642–4900 and its Web site is
located at https://www.ansi.org. In
addition, these standards are available
for inspection at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. These
standards are also available for
inspection at the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration’s Docket
Office, Room N–2625, U.S. Department
of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210, or any of
its regional offices. The telephone
number for the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration’s Docket Office is
(202) 693–2350 and its Web site is
located at https://dockets.osha.gov.
Baler that is designed or used to
process materials other than paper
means a powered machine designed or
used to compress materials other than
paper and cardboard boxes, with or
without binding, to a density or form
that will support handling and
transportation as a material unit without
requiring a disposable or reusable
container.
Compactor that is designed or used to
process materials other than paper
means a powered machine that remains
stationary during operation, designed or
used to compact refuse other than paper
or cardboard boxes into a detachable or
integral container or into a transfer
vehicle.
Operating or assisting to operate
means all work that involves starting or
stopping a machine covered by this
section, placing materials into or
removing materials from a machine,
28457
including clearing a machine of jammed
materials, paper, or cardboard, or any
other work directly involved in
operating the machine. The term does
not include the stacking of materials by
an employee in an area nearby or
adjacent to the machine where such
employee does not place the materials
into the machine.
Paper box compactor means a
powered machine that remains
stationary during operation, used to
compact refuse, including paper boxes,
into a detachable or integral container or
into a transfer vehicle.
Paper products machine means all
power-driven machines used in
remanufacturing or converting paper or
pulp into a finished product, including
preparing such materials for recycling;
or preparing such materials for disposal.
The term applies to such machines
whether they are used in establishments
that manufacture converted paper or
pulp products, or in any other type of
manufacturing or nonmanufacturing
establishment. The term also applies to
those machines which, in addition to
paper products, process other material
for disposal.
Scrap paper baler means a powered
machine used to compress paper and
possibly other solid waste, with or
without binding, to a density or form
that will support handling and
transportation as a material unit without
requiring a disposable or reusable
container.
(c)(1) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A)(1) That the scrap paper baler or
compactor meets the industry safety
standard applicable to the machine, as
specified in paragraph (b) of this section
and displayed in the following table.
ANSI
ANSI
ANSI
ANSI
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
In order for employers to take advantage of the limited exception discussed in this section, the scrap paper
baler must meet one of the following ANSI Standards:
In order for employers to take
advantage of the limited exception discussed in this section, the
paper box compactor must meet
one of the following ANSI Standards:
ANSI
ANSI
ANSI
ANSI
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Z245.5–1990
Z245.5–1997
Z245.5–2004
Z245.5–2008
................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
(2) The notice shall completely
identify the appropriate ANSI standard.
*
*
*
*
*
15. In § 570.65, the section heading
and paragraph (a)(2) are revised,
paragraph (a)(3) is added, and paragraph
(b) is revised to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 570.65 Occupations involving the
operation of circular saws, band saws,
guillotine shears, chain saws, reciprocating
saws, wood chippers, and abrasive cutting
discs (Order 14).
(a) * * *
(2) The occupations of operator of or
helper on the following power-driven
fixed or portable machines:
(i) Chain saws.
(ii) Reciprocating saws.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Standard
Standard
Standard
Standard
Z245.2–1992.
Z245.2–1997.
Z245.2–2004.
Z245.2–2008.
(iii) Wood chippers.
(iv) Abrasive cutting discs.
(3) The occupations of setting-up,
adjusting, repairing, oiling, or cleaning
circular saws, band saws, guillotine
shears, chain saws, reciprocating saws,
wood chippers, and abrasive cutting
discs.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28458
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Abrasive cutting disc shall mean a
machine equipped with a disc
embedded with abrasive materials used
for cutting materials.
Band saw shall mean a machine
equipped with an endless steel band
having a continuous series of notches or
teeth, running over wheels or pulleys,
and used for sawing materials.
Chain saw shall mean a machine that
has teeth linked together to form an
endless chain used for cutting materials.
Circular saw shall mean a machine
equipped with a thin steel disc having
a continuous series of notches or teeth
on the periphery, mounted on shafting,
and used for sawing materials.
Guillotine shear shall mean a machine
equipped with a moveable blade
operated vertically and used to shear
materials. The term shall not include
other types of shearing machines, using
a different form of shearing action, such
as alligator shears or circular shears.
Helper shall mean a person who
assists in the operation of a machine
covered by this section by helping place
materials into or remove them from the
machine.
Operator shall mean a person who
operates a machine covered by this
section by performing such functions as
starting or stopping the machine,
placing materials into or removing them
from the machine, or any other
functions directly involved in operation
of the machine.
Reciprocating saw shall mean a
machine equipped with a moving blade
that alternately changes direction on a
linear cutting axis used for sawing
materials.
Wood chipper shall mean a machine
equipped with a feed mechanism,
knives mounted on a rotating chipper
disc or drum, and a power plant used
to reduce to chips or shred such
materials as tree branches, trunk
segments, landscape waste, and other
materials.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart G—General Statements of
Interpretation of the Child Labor
Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938, as Amended
16. The authority citation for subpart
G continues to read as follows:
■
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
Authority: 52 Stat. 1060–1069 as amended;
29 U.S.C. 201–219.
17. Section 570.102 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 570.102. General scope of statutory
provisions.
The most important of the child labor
provisions are contained in sections
12(a), 12(c), and 3(l) of the Act. Section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
12(a) provides that no producer,
manufacturer, or dealer shall ship or
deliver for shipment in interstate or
foreign commerce any goods produced
in an establishment in or about which
oppressive child labor was employed
within 30 days before removal of the
goods. The full text of this subsection is
set forth in § 570.104 and its terms are
discussed in §§ 570.105 to 570.111,
inclusive. Section 12(c) prohibits any
employer from employing oppressive
child labor in interstate or foreign
commerce or in the production of goods
for such commerce. The text and
discussion of this provision appear in
§§ 570.112 and 570.113. Section 3(l) of
the Act, which defines the term
‘‘oppressive child labor,’’ is set forth in
§ 570.117 and its provisions are
discussed in §§ 570.118 to 570.121,
inclusive. It will further be noted that
the Act provides various specific
exemptions from the foregoing
provisions which are set forth and
discussed in §§ 570.122 to 570.130,
inclusive.
■ 18. In § 570.103, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 570.103 Comparison with wage and hour
provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Another distinction is that the
exemptions provided by the Act from
the minimum wage and/or overtime
provisions are more numerous and
differ from the exemptions granted from
the child labor provisions. There are
only eight specific child labor
exemptions of which only two apply to
the minimum wage and overtime pay
requirements as well. These are the
exemptions for employees engaged in
the delivery of newspapers to the
consumer and homeworkers engaged in
the making of wreaths composed
principally of evergreens.3 Apart from
these two exceptions, none of the
specific exemptions from the minimum
wage and/or overtime pay requirements
applies to the child labor provisions.
However, it should be noted that the
exclusion of certain employers by
section 3(d) 4 of the Act applies to the
child labor provisions as well as the
wage and hours provisions.
§ 570.111
[Amended]
19. In § 570.111, footnote 21 is revised
to read ‘‘However, section 12(a) contains
■
3 Both of these exemptions are contained in
section 13(d) of the FLSA.
4 Section 3(d) defines ‘employer’ as including
‘‘any person acting directly or indirectly in the
interest of an employer in relation to an employee
and includes a public agency, but does not include
any labor organization (other than when acting as
an employer) or anyone acting in the capacity of
officer or agent of such labor organization.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a provision relieving innocent
purchasers from liability thereunder
provided certain conditions are met. For
a discussion of this provision, see
§ 570.141.’’
20. Sections 570.118 through 570.120
are revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
§ 570.118
Sixteen-year minimum.
§ 570.119
Fourteen-year minimum.
§ 570.120
Eighteen-year minimum.
*
*
*
§ 570.118
*
*
Sixteen-year minimum.
The Act sets a 16-year-age minimum
for employment in manufacturing or
mining occupations, although under
FLSA section 13(c)(7), certain youth
between the ages of 14 and 18 may,
under specific conditions, be employed
inside and outside of places of business
that use power-driven machinery to
process wood products. Furthermore,
the 16-year-age minimum for
employment is applicable to
employment in all other occupations
unless otherwise provided by regulation
or order issued by the Secretary.
§ 570.119
Fourteen-year minimum.
With respect to employment in
occupations other than manufacturing
and mining and in accordance with the
provisions of FLSA section 13(c)(7), the
Secretary is authorized to issue
regulations or orders lowering the age
minimum to 14 years where he or she
finds that such employment is confined
to periods that will not interfere with
the minors’ schooling and to conditions
that will not interfere with their health
and well-being. Pursuant to this
authority, the Secretary has detailed in
§ 570.34 all those occupations in which
14- and 15-year-olds may be employed
when the work is performed outside
school hours and is confined to other
specified limits. The Secretary, in order
to provide clarity and assist employers
in attaining compliance, has listed in
§ 570.33 certain prohibited occupations
that, over the years, have been the
frequent subject of questions or
violations. The list of occupations in
§ 570.33 is not exhaustive. The
Secretary has also set forth, in § 570.35,
additional conditions that limit the
periods during which 14- and 15-yearolds may be employed. The
employment of minors under 14 years of
age is not permissible under any
circumstances if the employment is
covered by the child labor provisions
and not specifically exempt.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 570.120
Eighteen-year minimum.
To protect young workers from
hazardous employment, the FLSA
provides for a minimum age of 18 years
in occupations found and declared by
the Secretary to be particularly
hazardous or detrimental to the health
or well-being for minors 16 and 17 years
of age. Hazardous occupations orders
are the means through which
occupations are declared to be
particularly hazardous for minors. Since
1995, the promulgation and amendment
of the hazardous occupations orders
have been effectuated under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 551 et seq. The effect of these
orders is to raise the minimum age for
employment to 18 years in the
occupations covered. Seventeen orders,
published in subpart E of this part, have
thus far been issued under the FLSA
and are now in effect.
■ 21. Section 570.122 is revised to read
as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 570.122
General.
(a) Specific exemptions from the child
labor requirements of the Act are
provided for:
(1) Employment of children in
agriculture outside of school hours for
the school district where they live while
so employed;
(2) Employment of employees
engaged in the delivery of newspapers
to the consumer;
(3) Employment of children as actors
or performers in motion pictures or in
theatrical, radio, or television
productions;
(4) Employment by a parent or a
person standing in a parent’s place of
his own child or a child in his custody
under the age of sixteen years in any
occupation other than manufacturing,
mining, or an occupation found by the
Secretary to be particularly hazardous
for the employment of children between
the ages of sixteen and eighteen years or
detrimental to their health or wellbeing.
(5) Employment of homeworkers
engaged in the making of evergreen
wreaths, including the harvesting of the
evergreens or other forest products used
in making such wreaths.
(6) Employment of 16- and 17-yearolds to load, but not operate or unload,
certain scrap paper balers and paper box
compactors under specified conditions.
(7) Employment of 17-year-olds to
perform limited driving of cars and
trucks during daylight hours under
specified conditions.
(8) Employment of youths between
the ages of 14 and 18 years who, by
statute or judicial order, are excused
from compulsory school attendance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
beyond the eighth grade, under
specified conditions, in places of
business that use power-driven
machinery to process wood products.
(b) When interpreting these
provisions, the Secretary will be guided
by the principle that such exemptions
should be narrowly construed and their
application limited to those employees
who are plainly and unmistakably
within their terms. Thus, the fact that a
child’s occupation involves the
performance of work which is
considered exempt from the child labor
provisions will not relieve his employer
from the requirements of section 12(c)
or the producer, manufacturer, or dealer
from the requirements of section 12(a)
if, during the course of his employment,
the child spends any part of his time
doing work which is covered but not so
exempt.
■ 22. The undesignated center heading
preceding § 570.127 is removed.
■ 23. Section 570.127 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 570.127 Homeworkers engaged in the
making of evergreen wreaths.
FLSA section 13(d) provides an
exemption from the child labor
provisions, as well as the minimum
wage and overtime provisions, for
homeworkers engaged in the making of
wreaths composed principally of natural
holly, pine, cedar, or other evergreens
(including the harvesting of the
evergreens or other forest products used
in making such wreaths).
§ 570.128
[Redesignated as § 570.141]
24. Section 570.128 is redesignated as
§ 570.141 and a new § 570.128 is added
to read as follows:
■
§ 570.128 Loading of certain scrap paper
balers and paper box compactors.
(a) Section 13(c)(5) of the FLSA
provides for an exemption from the
child labor provisions for the
employment of 16- and 17-year-olds to
load, but not operate or unload, certain
power-driven scrap paper balers and
paper box compactors under certain
conditions. The provisions of this
exemption, which are contained in HO
12 (§ 570.63) include that the scrap
paper baler or compactor meet an
applicable standard established by the
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) and identified in the statute, or
a more recent ANSI standard that the
Secretary of Labor has found,
incorporated by reference (see § 570.63),
and declared to be as protective of the
safety of young workers as the ANSI
standard named in the statute.
(b) These standards have been
incorporated into these regulations by
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
28459
reference by the Federal Register as
discussed in § 570.63. In addition, the
scrap paper baler or paper box
compactor must include an on-off
switch incorporating a key-lock or other
system and the control of the system
must be maintained in the custody of
employees who are at least 18 years of
age. The on-off switch of the scrap paper
baler or paper box compactor must be
maintained in an off position when the
machine is not in operation.
Furthermore, the employer must also
post a notice on the scrap paper baler or
paper box compactor that conveys
certain information, including the
identification of the applicable ANSI
standard that the equipment meets, that
16- and 17-year-old employees may only
load the scrap paper baler or paper box
compactor, and that no employee under
the age of 18 may operate or unload the
scrap paper baler or paper box
compactor.
§ 570.129
[Redesignated as § 570.142]
25. Section 570.129 is redesignated as
§ 570.142
■ 26. A new § 570.129 is added to read
as follows:
■
§ 570.129 Limited driving of automobiles
and trucks by 17-year-olds.
Section 13(c)(6) of the FLSA provides
an exemption for 17-year-olds, but not
16-year-olds, who, as part of their
employment, perform the occasional
and incidental driving of automobiles
and trucks on public highways under
specified conditions. These specific
conditions, which are contained in HO
2 (§ 570.52), include that the automobile
or truck may not exceed 6,000 pounds
gross vehicle weight, the driving must
be restricted to daylight hours, the
vehicle must be equipped with a seat
belt or similar restraining device for the
driver and for any passengers, and the
employer must instruct the employee
that such belts or other devices must be
used. In addition, the 17-year-old must
hold a State license valid for the type of
driving involved in the job, have
successfully completed a Stateapproved driver education course, and
have no records of any moving
violations at the time of his or her hire.
The exemption also prohibits the minor
from performing any driving involving
the towing of vehicles; route deliveries
or route sales; the transportation for hire
of property, goods, or passengers;
urgent, time-sensitive deliveries; or the
transporting of more than three
passengers at any one time. The
exemption also places limitations on the
number of trips the 17-year-old may
make each day and restricts the driving
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
28460
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
to a 30-mile radius of the minor’s place
of employment.
■ 27. A new § 570.130 is added to read
as follows:
§ 570.130 Employment of certain youth
inside and outside of places of business
that use power-driven machinery to process
wood products.
Section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA provides
a limited exemption from the child
labor provisions for certain youths
between the ages of 14 and 18 years
who, by statute or judicial order, are
excused from compulsory school
attendance beyond the eighth grade, that
permits their employment inside and
outside of places of business that use
power-driven machinery to process
wood products. The provisions of this
exemption are contained in subpart C of
this part (§ 570.34(m)) and HO 4
(§ 570.54). Although the exemption
allows certain youths between the ages
of 14 and 18 years to be employed
inside and outside of places of business
that use power-driven machines to
process wood products, it does so only
if such youths do not operate or assist
in the operation of power-driven
woodworking machines. The exemption
also requires that the youth be
supervised by an adult relative or by an
adult member of the same religious sect
as the youth. The youth must also be
protected from wood particles or other
flying debris within the workplace by a
barrier appropriate to the potential
hazard of such wood particles or flying
debris or by maintaining a sufficient
distance from machinery in operation.
For the exemption to apply, the youth
must also be required to use personal
protective equipment to prevent
exposure to excessive levels of noise
and sawdust.
■ 28. A new center heading and a new
§ 570.140 are added to read as follows:
Enforcement
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 570.140
General.
(a) Section 15(a)(4) of the Act makes
any violation of the provisions of
sections 12(a) or 12(c) unlawful. Any
such unlawful act or practice may be
enjoined by the United States District
Courts under section 17 upon court
action, filed by the Secretary pursuant
to section 12(b) and, if willful will
subject the offender to the criminal
penalties provided in section 16(a) of
the Act. Section 16(a) provides that any
person who willfully violates any of the
provisions of section 15 shall upon
conviction thereof be subject to a fine of
not more than $10,000, or to
imprisonment for not more than six
months, or both. No person shall be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
imprisoned under this subsection
except for an offense committed after
the conviction of such person for a prior
offense under this subsection.
(b) In addition, FLSA section 16(e)
states that any person who violates the
provisions of FLSA sections 12 or 13(c),
relating to child labor, or any
regulations issued under those sections,
shall be subject to a civil penalty, not to
exceed:
(1) $11,000, for each employee who
was the subject of such a violation; or
(2) $50,000 with regard to each such
violation that causes the death or
serious injury of any employee under
the age of 18 years, which penalty may
be doubled where the violation is
repeated or willful.
(c) Part 579 of this chapter, Child
Labor Violations—Civil Money
Penalties, provides for the issuance of
the notice of civil money penalties for
any violation of FLSA sections 12 or
13(c) relating to child labor. Part 580 of
this chapter, Civil Money Penalties—
Procedures for Assessing and Contesting
Penalties, describes the administrative
process for assessment and resolution of
the civil money penalties. When a civil
money penalty is assessed against an
employer for a child labor violation, the
employer has the right, within 15 days
after receipt of the notice of such
penalty, to file an exception to the
determination that the violation or
violations occurred. When such an
exception is filed with the office making
the assessment, the matter is referred to
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
and a formal hearing is scheduled. At
such a hearing, the employer or an
attorney retained by the employer may
present such witnesses, introduce such
evidence and establish such facts as the
employer believes will support the
exception. The determination of the
amount of any civil money penalty
becomes final if no exception is taken to
the administrative assessment thereof,
or if no exception is filed to the decision
and order of the administrative law
judge.
PART 579—CHILD LABOR
VIOLATIONS—CIVIL MONEY
PENALTIES
29. The authority citation for part 579
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 203(l), 211, 212,
213(c), 216; Reorg. Plan No. 6 of 1950, 64
Stat. 1263, 5 U.S.C. App; secs. 25, 29, 88 Stat.
72, 76; Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 09–
2009 (Nov. 16, 2009): Delegation of
Authorities and Assignment of
Responsibilities to the Administrator, Wage
and Hour Division, 74 FR 58836; 104 Stat.
890 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), as amended by 110
Stat. 1321–373 and 112 Stat. 3293.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
30. In § 579.1, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
(a) Section 16(e), added to the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938, as
amended, by the Fair Labor Standards
Amendments of 1974, and as further
amended by the Fair Labor Standards
Amendments of 1989, the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, the
Compactor and Balers Safety Standards
Modernization Act of 1996, and the
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
Act of 2008, provides for the imposition
of civil money penalties in the following
manner:
(1)(i) Any person who violates the
provisions of sections 212 or 213(c) of
the FLSA, relating to child labor, or any
regulation issued pursuant to such
sections, shall be subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed:
(A) $11,000 for each employee who
was the subject of such a violation; or
(B) $50,000 with regard to each such
violation that causes the death or
serious injury of any employee under
the age of 18 years, which penalty may
be doubled where the violation is a
repeated or willful violation.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(1)(i)(B) of this section, the term
‘‘serious injury’’ means:
(A) Permanent loss or substantial
impairment of one of the senses (sight,
hearing, taste, smell, tactile sensation);
(B) Permanent loss or substantial
impairment of the function of a bodily
member, organ, or mental faculty,
including the loss of all or part of an
arm, leg, foot, hand or other body part;
or
(C) Permanent paralysis or substantial
impairment that causes loss of
movement or mobility of an arm, leg,
foot, hand or other body part.
(2) Any person who repeatedly or
willfully violates section 206 or 207 of
the FLSA, relating to wages, shall be
subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$1,100 for each such violation.
(3) In determining the amount of any
penalty under section 216(e) of the
FLSA, the appropriateness of such
penalty to the size of the business of the
person charged and the gravity of the
violation shall be considered. The
amount of any penalty under section
216(e) of the FLSA, when finally
determined, may be:
(i) Deducted from any sums owing by
the United States to the person charged;
(ii) Recovered in a civil action brought
by the Secretary in any court of
competent jurisdiction, in which
litigation the Secretary shall be
represented by the Solicitor of Labor; or
(iii) Ordered by the court, in an action
brought for a violation of section
215(a)(4) or a repeated or willful
■
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
violation of section 215(a)(2) of the
FLSA, to be paid to the Secretary.
(4) Any administrative determination
by the Secretary of the amount of any
penalty under section 216(e) of the
FLSA shall be final, unless within 15
days after receipt of notice thereof by
certified mail the person charged with
the violation takes exception to the
determination that the violations for
which the penalty is imposed occurred,
in which event final determination of
the penalty shall be made in an
administrative proceeding after
opportunity for hearing in accordance
with section 554 of title 5, United States
Code, and regulations to be promulgated
by the Secretary.
(5) Except for civil penalties collected
for violations of section 212 of the
FLSA, sums collected as penalties
pursuant to section 216(e) of the FLSA
shall be applied toward reimbursement
of the costs of determining the
violations and assessing and collecting
such penalties, in accordance with the
provision of section 202 of the Act
entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the
Department of Labor to make special
statistical studies upon payment of the
cost thereof and for other purposes’’ (29
U.S.C. 9a). Civil penalties collected for
violations of section 212 shall be
deposited in the general fund of the
Treasury.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 31. Section 579.2 is revised to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES3
§ 579.2
Definitions.
As used in this part and part 580 of
this chapter:
Act means the Fair Labor Standards
Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1060,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq.).
Administrative law judge means a
person appointed as provided in 5
U.S.C. 3105 and subpart B of part 930
of title 5 of the CFR, and qualified to
preside at hearings under 5 U.S.C. 554–
557.
Administrator means the
Administrator of the Wage and Hour
Division, U.S. Department of Labor, and
includes an authorized representative
designated by the Administrator to
perform any of the functions of the
Administrator under this part and part
580 of this chapter.
Agency has the meaning given it by 5
U.S.C. 551.
Chief Administrative Law Judge
means the Chief Administrative Law
Judge, Office of Administrative Law
Judges, U.S. Department of Labor, 800 K
Street, NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC
20001–8002.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 May 19, 2010
Jkt 220001
Department means the U.S.
Department of Labor.
Person includes any individual,
partnership, corporation, association,
business trust, legal representative, or
organized group of persons.
Repeated violations has two
components. An employer’s violation of
section 12 or section 13(c) of the Act
relating to child labor or any regulation
issued pursuant to such sections shall
be deemed to be repeated for purposes
of this section:
(1) Where the employer has
previously violated section 12 or section
13(c) of the Act relating to child labor
or any regulation issued pursuant to
such sections, provided the employer
has previously received notice, through
a responsible official of the Wage and
Hour Division or otherwise
authoritatively, that the employer
allegedly was in violation of the
provisions of the Act; or,
(2) Where a court or other tribunal has
made a finding that an employer has
previously violated section 12 or section
13(c) of the Act relating to child labor
or any regulation issued pursuant to
such sections, unless an appeal
therefrom which has been timely filed is
pending before a court or other tribunal
with jurisdiction to hear the appeal, or
unless the finding has been set aside or
reversed by such appellate tribunal.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, or an
authorized representative of the
Secretary.
Serious injury means:
(1) Permanent loss or substantial
impairment of one of the senses (sight,
hearing, taste, smell, tactile sensation);
(2) Permanent loss or substantial
impairment of the function of a bodily
member, organ, or mental faculty,
including the loss of all or part of an
arm, leg, foot, hand or other body part;
or,
(3) Permanent paralysis or substantial
impairment that causes loss of
movement or mobility of an arm, leg,
foot, hand or other body part.
Solicitor of Labor means the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, and includes
attorneys designated by the Solicitor to
perform functions of the Solicitor under
this part and part 780 of this chapter.
Willful violations under this section
has several components. An employer’s
violation of section 12 or section 13(c)
of the Act relating to child labor or any
regulation issued pursuant to such
sections, shall be deemed to be willful
for purposes of this section where the
employer knew that its conduct was
prohibited by the Act or showed
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
28461
reckless disregard for the requirements
of the Act. All of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the violation
shall be taken into account in
determining whether a violation was
willful. In addition, for purposes of this
section, an employer’s conduct shall be
deemed knowing, among other
situations, if the employer received
advice from a responsible official of the
Wage and Hour Division to the effect
that the conduct in question is not
lawful. For purposes of this section, an
employer’s conduct shall be deemed to
be in reckless disregard of the
requirements of the Act, among other
situations, if the employer should have
inquired further into whether its
conduct was in compliance with the
Act, and failed to make adequate further
inquiry.
32. In § 579.5, paragraphs (a) and (e)
are revised to read as follows:
■
§ 579.5 Determining the amount of the
penalty and assessing the penalty.
(a) The administrative determination
of the amount of the civil penalty for
each employee who was the subject of
a violation of section 12 or section 13(c)
of the Act relating to child labor or of
any regulation under those sections will
be based on the available evidence of
the violation or violations and will take
into consideration the size of the
business of the person charged and the
gravity of the violations as provided in
paragraphs (b) through (d) of this
section. The provisions of section
16(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act, regarding the assessment
of civil penalties not to exceed $50,000
with regard to each violation that causes
the death or serious injury of any
employee under the age of 18 years,
apply only to those violations that occur
on or after May 21, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An administrative determination
of the amount of the civil money
penalty for a particular violation or
particular violations of section 12 or
section 13(c) relating to child labor or
any regulation issued under those
sections shall become final 15 days after
receipt of the notice of penalty by
certified mail by the person so charged
unless such person has, pursuant to
§ 580.6 filed with the Secretary an
exception to the determination that the
violation or violations for which the
penalty is imposed occurred.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–11434 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–27–P
E:\FR\FM\20MYR3.SGM
20MYR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 97 (Thursday, May 20, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28404-28461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11434]
[[Page 28403]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Labor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wage and Hour Division
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
29 CFR Parts 570 and 579
Child Labor Regulations, Orders and Statements of Interpretation; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 28404]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Wage and Hour Division
29 CFR Parts 570 and 579
RIN 1215-AB57
RIN 1235-AA01
Child Labor Regulations, Orders and Statements of Interpretation
AGENCY: Wage and Hour Division, Labor.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Final Rule revises the child labor regulations to
incorporate statutory amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act and to
update and clarify the regulations that establish protections for youth
employed in nonagricultural occupations. These revisions also implement
specific recommendations made by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health in its 2002 report to the Department of
Labor. The Department of Labor is revising the regulations to
incorporate the 2008 amendment to section 16(e) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act that substantially increased the maximum permissible
civil money penalty an employer may be assessed for child labor
violations that cause the death or serious injury of a young worker.
DATES: Effective Dates: This rule is effective July 19, 2010. The
incorporation by reference of American National Standards Institute
standards in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 19, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur M. Kerschner, Jr., Division of
Enforcement Policy, Branch of Child Labor and Special Employment
Enforcement, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-
3510, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:
(202) 693-0072 (this is not a toll free number). Copies of this Final
Rule may be obtained in alternative formats (Large Print, Braille,
Audio Tape, or Disc), upon request, by calling (202) 693-0023. TTY/TDD
callers may dial toll-free (877) 889-5627 to obtain information or
request materials in alternative formats.
Questions of interpretation and/or enforcement of regulations
issued by this agency or referenced in this Final Rule may be directed
to the nearest Wage and Hour Division District Office. Locate the
nearest office by calling the Wage and Hour Division's toll-free help
line at (866) 4US-WAGE ((866) 487-9243) between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. in
your local time zone, or log onto the Wage and Hour Division's Web site
for a nationwide listing of Wage and Hour District and Area Offices at:
https://www.dol.gov/whd/america2.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The revisions in this Final Rule continue
the Department of Labor's tradition of fostering permissible and
appropriate job opportunities for working youth that are healthy, safe,
and not detrimental to their education.
The Regulatory Information Number (RIN) identified for this
rulemaking changed with the publication of the 2010 Spring Regulatory
Agenda due to an organizational restructuring. The old RIN was assigned
to the Employment Standards Administration, which no longer exists. A
new RIN has been assigned to the Wage and Hour Division.
I. Background
The child labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
establish a minimum age of 16 years for employment in nonagricultural
occupations, but the Secretary of Labor is authorized to provide by
regulation for 14- and 15-year-olds to work in suitable occupations
other than manufacturing or mining, and during periods and under
conditions that will not interfere with their schooling or health and
well-being. The child labor provisions of the FLSA permit 16- and 17-
year-olds to work in the nonagricultural sector without hours or time
limitations, except in certain occupations found and declared by the
Secretary to be particularly hazardous or detrimental to the health or
well-being of such workers.
The regulations for 14- and 15-year-olds are known as Child Labor
Regulation No. 3 (Reg. 3) and are contained in subpart C of part 570
(29 CFR 570.31-.37). Reg. 3 limits the hours and times of day that such
minors may work and identifies occupations that are either permitted or
prohibited for such minors. Under Reg. 3, 14- and 15-year-olds may work
in certain occupations in retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishments, but are not permitted to work in certain other
occupations (including all occupations found by the Secretary to be
particularly hazardous for 16- and 17-year-olds). Reg. 3, originally
promulgated in 1939, was revised to reflect the 1961 amendments to the
FLSA, which extended the Act's coverage to include enterprises engaged
in commerce or the production of goods for commerce and thereby brought
more working youth employed in retail, food service, and gasoline
service establishments within the protections of the Act.
The regulations concerning nonagricultural hazardous occupations
are contained in subpart E of 29 CFR part 570 (29 CFR 570.50-.68).
These Hazardous Occupations Orders (HOs) apply on either an industry
basis, specifying the occupations in a particular industry that are
prohibited, or an occupational basis, irrespective of the industry in
which the work is performed. The seventeen HOs were adopted
individually during the period of 1939 through 1963. Some of the HOs,
specifically HOs 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 17, contain limited
exemptions that permit the employment of 16- and 17-year-old
apprentices and student-learners under particular conditions to perform
work otherwise prohibited to that age group. The terms and conditions
for employing such apprentices and student-learners are detailed in
Sec. 570.50(b) and (c).
Because of changes in the workplace, the introduction of new
processes and technologies, the emergence of new types of businesses
where young workers may find employment opportunities, the existence of
differing federal and state standards, and divergent views on how best
to balance scholastic requirements and work experiences, the Department
has long been reviewing the criteria for permissible child labor
employment. A detailed discussion of the Department's review was
included in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in the Federal
Register on April 17, 2007 (see 72 FR 19339).
Congress twice amended the child labor provisions of the FLSA in
the 1990s. The Compactors and Balers Safety Standards Modernization
Act, Public Law 104-174 (Compactor and Baler Act), was signed into law
on August 6, 1996. This legislation added section 13(c)(5) to the FLSA,
permitting minors 16 and 17 years of age to load, but not operate or
unload, certain scrap paper balers and paper box compactors when
certain requirements are met. The Drive for Teen Employment Act, Public
Law 105-334, was signed into law on October 31, 1998. This legislation
added section 13(c)(6) to the FLSA which prohibits minors under 17
years of age from driving automobiles and trucks on public roadways on
the job and establishes the conditions and criteria for 17-year-olds to
drive automobiles and trucks on public roadways on the job.
The Department published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in
the Federal Register on November 30, 1999 (64 FR 67130), inviting
comments on revisions of regulations to implement
[[Page 28405]]
the 1996 and 1998 amendments and to update certain regulatory
standards.
In 1998, the Department provided funds to the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) to conduct a comprehensive
review of scientific literature and available data in order to assess
current workplace hazards and the adequacy of the current child labor
HOs to address them. This study was commissioned to provide the
Secretary with another tool to use in her ongoing review of the child
labor provisions, and of the hazardous occupations orders in
particular. The report, entitled National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommendations to the U.S. Department of
Labor for Changes to Hazardous Orders (hereinafter referred to as the
NIOSH Report or the Report), was issued in July of 2002. The Report,
which makes 35 recommendations concerning the existing nonagricultural
HOs and recommends the creation of 17 new HOs, also incorporated the
comments NIOSH submitted in response to the 1999 NPRM. The Report is
available for review on the Department's YouthRules! Web site at https://www.youthrules.dol.gov/resources.htm.
The Department recognizes NIOSH's extensive research efforts in
compiling and reviewing this data. However, it has cautioned readers
about reaching conclusions and expecting revisions to the existing HOs
based solely on the information in the Report. In the Report, NIOSH
itself recognized the confines of its methodology and included
appropriate caveats about the limitations of the available data and
gaps in research. Of those limitations, the following are worth noting.
The NIOSH Report recommendations are driven by information on high-risk
activities for all workers, not just patterns of fatalities and serious
injuries among young workers. There is little occupational injury,
illness, and fatality data available regarding minors less than 16
years of age. In addition, such data for youth 16 and 17 years of age
tend to be mixed with that of older workers whose employment is not
subject to the child labor provisions of the FLSA. Also, available
occupational injury, illness, fatality, and employment data on the
specific operations in the specific industries covered by the NIOSH
Report recommendations tend to be combined with data on other
operations and/or industries. In some cases, this may result in a
diminution of the risk by including less risky operations and
industries in the employment estimates. In other cases, the risk may be
exaggerated by including more dangerous operations/industries in the
injury, illness, or fatality estimates.
In addition, as NIOSH was tasked with examining issues within the
framework of the current HOs only, the Report did not consider the
extent to which fatalities occur despite existing HOs, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, or state laws
prohibiting the activity. If fatalities result from recognized illegal
activities, such as working with fireworks or a power-driven circular
saw, the best strategy for preventing future injuries may not be to
revise the regulations but to increase compliance with existing laws
through public awareness initiatives, targeted compliance assistance
efforts, and stepped-up enforcement activities. The Report also did not
consider potential approaches for decreasing workplace injuries and
fatalities that provide an alternative to a complete ban on employment,
such as safety training, increased supervision, the use of effective
personal protective equipment, and strict adherence to recognized safe
working practices.
Though cognizant of the limitations of the Report, the Department
places great value on the information and analysis provided by NIOSH.
Since receiving the Report, the Department has conducted a detailed
review and has met with various stakeholders to evaluate and prioritize
each recommendation for possible regulatory action consistent with the
established national policy of balancing the benefits of employment
opportunities for youth with the necessary and appropriate safety
protections. The Department's 2004 Final Rule addressed six of the
recommendations.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Public Law 108-199,
Sec. 108, which was signed into law on January 23, 2004, amended the
FLSA by creating a limited exemption from the child labor provisions
for minors 14 to 18 years of age who are excused from compulsory school
attendance beyond the eighth grade. The exemption, contained in section
13(c)(7) of the FLSA, allows eligible youth, under specific conditions,
to be employed inside and outside of places of business that use
machinery to process wood products, but does not allow such youth to
operate or assist in operating power-driven woodworking machines. This
exemption overrides the FLSA's formerly complete prohibition on the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in manufacturing occupations
contained in section 3(l).
The Department proposed revisions of the child labor regulations to
implement the 2004 legislation, address 25 of the remaining 29 NIOSH
Report recommendations dealing with existing nonagricultural hazardous
occupations orders, and revise and/or clarify the permitted and
prohibited occupations and industries and conditions and periods of
employment established for 14- and 15-year-olds by Reg. 3, in an NPRM
published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2007 (72 FR 19337). The
NPRM also proposed to incorporate into the regulations three long-
standing enforcement positions regarding the cleaning of power-driven
meat processing equipment, the operation of certain power-driven pizza-
dough rollers, and the definition of high-lift trucks. In addition, the
Department proposed to expand the HO that prohibits youth from
operating power-driven circular saws, band saws, and guillotine shears
to also prohibit the operation of power-driven chain saws, wood
chippers, and reciprocating saws. Finally, the Department proposed to
revise subpart G of the child labor regulations, entitled General
Statements of Interpretation of the Child Labor Provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938, as Amended, to incorporate all the changes
adopted by the agency since this subpart was last revised in 1971.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) (Pub.
L. 110-233) was enacted into law on May 21, 2008, after the publication
of the 2007 NPRM. GINA, among other things, amended FLSA section 16(e)
to provide that any person who violates the provisions of sections 12
or 13(c) of the FLSA, relating to child labor, or any regulation issued
pursuant to such sections, shall be subject to a civil money penalty
not to exceed $11,000 for each employee who was the subject of such a
violation. In addition, GINA also permits the assessment of a civil
money penalty up to $50,000 with regard to each violation that caused
the death or serious injury of any employee under the age of 18 years.
That penalty may be doubled, up to $100,000, when such violation is
determined by the Department to be a repeated or willful violation.
These changes in the law became effective May 21, 2008.
As mentioned, the NIOSH Report made 35 recommendations concerning
the existing nonagricultural HOs. The Department addressed six of those
recommendations in the 2004 Final Rule published December 16, 2004 (see
69 FR 75382). The Department, in the April 17, 2007 NPRM, based on its
determination that there was sufficient
[[Page 28406]]
data available, addressed 25 of the remaining 29 NIOSH Report
recommendations dealing with the existing nonagricultural hazardous
occupations orders. In an attempt to acquire additional data needed to
address the remaining nonagricultural NIOSH recommendations and to
pursue certain other issues not explored in the NIOSH Report, the
Department also published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) concurrently with the 2007 NPRM (see 72 FR 19328). Because very
little substantive information was received, the Department withdrew
the ANPRM on February 24, 2010. No proposed rule will result directly
from that information collection effort, however, the topics discussed
in the ANPRM may be the subject of a future rulemaking. The comments
submitted in response to the ANPRM may be reviewed at the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov, docket identification
number WHD-2007-0001.
The NIOSH Report also made 14 recommendations that impact the
current agricultural HOs and recommended the creation of 17 new HOs.
The Department, in the ANPRM published on April 17, 2007, requested
public comment on the feasibility of one of those recommendations
regarding the creation of a new HO that would prohibit the employment
of youth in construction occupations.
The Department is continuing to review all of the remaining NIOSH
Report recommendations, but excluded them from immediate consideration
in order to keep the size and scope of the 2007 ANPRM and NPRM
manageable. Their absence from this current round of rulemaking is not
an indication that the Department believes them to be of less
importance or that they are not being given the same level of
consideration as the recommendations addressing the current
nonagricultural HOs. In that regard, the Department is nearing
completion of its thorough review of the NIOSH recommendations that
address the agricultural hazardous occupations orders.
II. Summary of Comments
A total of 28 comments were received and are available for review
at the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. The
Docket ID for the NPRM that generated these comments is WHD-2007-0002.
Comments were received from trade and professional associations;
advocacy and occupational health and safety organizations; employers;
federal, state, and local government agencies; representatives of
schools and organizations that provide vocational training to youth;
and one private citizen. The one private citizen comment, which
concerned the issue of door-to-door sales, was incorrectly submitted to
the ANPRM docket by the commenter and was assigned a Document ID of
WHD-2007-0001-0004. One commenter, the International Association of
Amusement Parks and Attractions, included comments from three of its
member organizations along with its submission. Four of the comments do
not address any of the issues raised by the April 17, 2007 NPRM and
focus solely on topics raised by the ANPRM that was published by the
Department on that same day. One commenter, the National Children's
Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety, did not address
any specific proposal but expressed concerns that the Department has
not yet implemented the NIOSH Report recommendations for agricultural
HOs. In regards to the nonagricultural youth provisions, it stated that
``it does not appear that protection of youth workers is at the heart
of some of the proposed changes, but rather the needs of industry and
special interest groups.''
Many of the comments concerned a single issue or a cluster of
issues impacting a single industry, but two comments were quite
extensive and addressed almost every proposal raised by the NPRM. These
comprehensive comments were submitted by the Young Workers Health and
Safety Network (YWN) and the Child Labor Coalition (CLC). The
Department appreciates the time and effort all of these commenters
devoted to their submissions.
The YWN is a subcommittee of the Occupational Health and Safety
Section of the American Public Health Association. It described itself
as an informal network of public health professionals, advocates, and
government agency staff that includes individuals from academia, public
health, labor law enforcement, health and safety consultation and/or
enforcement, labor organizations, and educators. The YWN reported that,
in formulating its comments, it tried to use the following principles:
The regulations should protect youth from significant hazards; where
possible, the regulations should be kept clear and consistent, limiting
the number of exceptions or exemptions, thus fostering better
compliance and more effective enforcement; and, the regulations should
allow youth to do a broad variety of different types of potentially
rewarding work.
The CLC, which has more than 30 member organizations, described
itself as the largest grouping in the United States of advocates for
the protection of the safety, health, and education of working
children. The CLC reported that its comments are also endorsed by the
following organizations: A Better World Foundation, A Minor
Consideration, American Federation of Teachers, American Federation of
School Administrators, Americans for Democratic Action, Association of
Farmworker Opportunity Programs, Farmworker Justice, International
Initiative to End Child Labor, Migrant Legal Action Program, National
Association of State Directors of Migrant Education, National Consumers
League, Ramsay Merriam Fund, and the United Food and Commercial Workers
International Union. The CLC stated that its comments are in line with
its stated mission and objectives, which include creating a network for
the exchange of information about child labor, providing a forum and a
unified voice on protecting working minors and ending child labor
exploitation, and developing informational and educational outreach to
the public and private sectors to combat child labor abuses and to
promote progressive initiatives and legislation. The American
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO),
while submitting its own comments, also endorsed those submitted by the
CLC.
III. Regulatory Revisions
Many of the revisions being made by this Final Rule will result in
the redesignation of several sections and subsections of the
regulations. In order to prevent confusion when providing citations in
this discussion, the Department will provide, when appropriate, both
the current citation (the citation prior to the effective date of this
Final Rule) and the new citation (the citation that will apply on and
after the effective date of this Final Rule). For example, the section
of Reg. 3 that prohibits 14- and 15-year-olds from employment in
occupations in connection with warehousing and storage would be cited
as Sec. 570.33(f)(2)(old) or Sec. 570.33(n)(2)(new).
A. Occupations That Are Prohibited for the Employment of Minors Between
the Ages of 14 and 16 Years of Age (29 CFR 570.31-.34)
Section 3(l) of the FLSA defines oppressive child labor to
expressly prohibit children under the age of 16 from performing any
work other than that which the Secretary of Labor permits, by order or
regulation, upon
[[Page 28407]]
finding that it does not interfere with their schooling or health and
well-being (see 29 U.S.C. 203(l), see also 29 CFR 570.117-.119). Before
14- and 15-year-olds may legally perform work covered by the FLSA, the
Act requires that the work itself be exempt, or that the Secretary
determines that the work to be performed does not constitute oppressive
child labor. The Secretary's declarations of what work is not deemed
oppressive for children between the ages of 14 and 16 appear in Reg. 3
(29 CFR 570.31-.37).
Reg. 3 identifies a number of occupations and activities that are
specifically prohibited for these minors without regard to the industry
or the type of business in which their employer is engaged (e.g.,
operating or tending any power-driven machinery other than office
machines, see Sec. 570.33(b) (old) and Sec. 570.33(e) (new)). Reg. 3
also incorporates by reference all of the prohibitions contained in the
Hazardous Occupations Orders (29 CFR 570.50-.68), which identify
occupations that are ``particularly hazardous'' and, therefore,
prohibited for 16- and 17-year-olds (e.g., occupations involved in the
operation of power-driven metal forming, punching, and shearing
machines, see Sec. 570.33(e) (old) and Sec. 570.33(b) (new)).
As previously mentioned, Reg. 3 was revised to reflect the 1961
amendments to the FLSA which extended the Act's coverage to include
enterprises engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce
and thereby brought more working youth employed in retail, food
service, and gasoline service establishments within the protections of
the Act. The current Sec. 570.34(a) expressly authorizes the
performance of certain activities by 14- and 15-year-olds in retail,
food service, and gasoline service establishments, while Sec.
570.34(b) details those activities that 14- and 15-year-olds are
expressly prohibited from performing in such establishments. For
example, clerical work, cashiering, and clean-up work are authorized,
whereas ``all work requiring the use of ladders, scaffolds, or their
substitutes'' is prohibited. These special rules currently apply only
in the designated types of business.
Since 1961, new, positive, and safe employment opportunities have
opened up for youth in industries other than retail, food service, and
gasoline service that the existing Reg. 3 does not specifically
address. Jobs in such areas as state and local governments, banks,
insurance companies, advertising agencies, and information technology
firms all normally fall outside of the permitted establishments
declared in Reg. 3. Because these jobs are not specifically permitted
by Sec. 570.33 (old), they are prohibited. There has been some
confusion about this over the years. Some employers believe that 14-
and 15-year-olds are permitted to be employed in any industry or
occupations not expressly prohibited by Reg. 3, or that any employer in
any industry is permitted to employ such youth in the occupations
permitted by Sec. 570.34(a) (old). However, when those jobs are not
located in retail, food service, or gasoline service establishments,
the provisions of Sec. 570.34 (old) (both authorizations and
prohibitions) do not apply to the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds.
The exception to this rule is where there is some discrete operation or
division that could legitimately be characterized as such an
establishment and therefore would be subject to these rules (e.g.,
minors employed in a food service operation at a city park or a
publicly owned sports stadium). The existing Reg. 3 prohibits employers
such as state and local governments, banks, insurance companies,
advertising agencies, and information technology firms from employing
14- and 15-year-old workers in any jobs other than those that occur in
those discrete operations or divisions that could be characterized as
retail, food service, or gasoline service establishments.
In 2004, in recognition of the importance of youth employment
programs operated by public sector employers that provide safe and
meaningful developmental opportunities for young people, and in
response to specific requests received from two municipalities, the
Department adopted an enforcement position that permits state and local
governments to employ 14- and 15-year-old minors under certain
conditions. Consistent with its enforcement position, the Department
exercised its prosecutorial discretion, as authorized by 29 U.S.C.
216(e), and declined to cite Reg. 3 occupations violations for the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds by state and local governments as
long as that employment fell within the occupations authorized by Reg.
3 (Sec. 570.34(a) (old)) and did not involve any of the tasks or
occupations prohibited by Reg. 3 (Sec. Sec. 570.33 and 570.34(b)
(old)). The Department enforced all the other provisions of Reg. 3,
including the restrictions on hours of work, with respect to the
employment of such minors.
The Department's administration of this enforcement position
permitting the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds by state and local
governments has had extremely positive results. There are indications,
as reported by state and local governments and reflected in WHD
enforcement findings, that when such youth are employed under the
guidelines established by the enforcement position, that employment
does not interfere with their schooling or with their health and well-
being, and thus is in accordance with the directive of the FLSA.
Based upon the success of the above enforcement position, the
Department, in the April 17, 2007 NPRM, proposed to revise and
reorganize Sec. Sec. 570.33 and 570.34 to clarify and to expand the
list of jobs that are either permitted or prohibited for minors who are
14 and 15 years of age. The Department also proposed to remove the
language that limited the application of Sec. 570.34 to only retail,
food service, and gasoline service establishments. As proposed, the
revised Sec. 570.33 detailed certain specific occupations prohibited
for 14- and 15-year-olds. This revision also necessitates a change to
Sec. 570.35a(c)(3) (old) because it references Sec. Sec. 570.33 and
570.34 as they pertain to Work Experience and Career Exploration
Programs (WECEPs). The Department proposed to retain all the current
prohibitions contained in Sec. 570.33 but would modify the prohibition
regarding the employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in manufacturing
occupations to comport with the provisions of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2004, which enacted section 13(c)(7) of the FLSA.
The NPRM proposed to continue to allow the employment of 14- and 15-
year-olds in all those retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishment occupations in which they are currently permitted to be
employed.
The Department also proposed to apply to FLSA-covered
nonagricultural employers of minors, with certain modifications, all
the permitted occupations contained in Sec. 570.34(a) (old) and all
the prohibited occupations contained in Sec. 570.34(b) (old) that
currently apply only to retail, food service, and gasoline service
establishments. This proposal would be accomplished by revising Sec.
570.34 to identify permitted occupations. The Department also proposed
to continue to permit youth 14- and 15-years of age to perform those
occupations involving processing, operating of machines, and working in
rooms where processing and manufacturing take place, that are currently
permitted under Sec. 570.34(a) (old), as referenced in Sec.
570.34(b)(1) (old).
As mentioned, certain modifications to the existing lists of
permissible and prohibited occupations were also
[[Page 28408]]
proposed. The traditionally prohibited occupations and industries
would, after adoption of the proposal, be contained in a revised Sec.
570.33, and all the permitted occupations and industries would be
contained in a revised Sec. 570.34. The Department is aware that,
given the FLSA's mandate that before 14- or 15-year-olds may legally be
employed to perform any covered work, the Secretary of Labor must first
determine that the work to be performed does not constitute oppressive
child labor, it could choose to publish only a list of permissible
occupations and industries, and not provide a list of certain commonly
arising prohibited occupations and industries. However, the Department
believes that by continuing the long-standing Reg. 3 tradition of
publishing lists of those occupations and industries in which such
youth may be employed as well as detailed examples of those industries
and occupations in which the employment of such youth is prohibited, it
can greatly enhance the public's understanding of these important
provisions. The list of prohibited industries and occupations helps to
define and to provide clarity to the list of permitted industries and
occupations. However, the list of prohibited occupations is not
intended to identify every prohibited occupation, but rather only to
provide examples of those prohibited occupations that have historically
been the most common sources of violations or concern. As previously
explained, any job not specifically permitted is prohibited.
The Department also understands that, given the constant
development and changes occurring in the modern workplace, in
continuing to provide a definitive list of permitted occupations and
industries, it may unintentionally discourage the creation of positive
and safe employment opportunities for young workers. But the Department
believes that, by continuing its past practice of carefully reviewing
inquiries regarding individual occupations or industries not currently
addressed by Reg. 3 and then exercising its prosecutorial discretion
and issuing enforcement positions that may eventually lead to
rulemaking--as evidenced by certain revisions contained in this Final
Rule--it has developed an efficient and effective mechanism which
overcomes the limitations of a definitive list. The Department firmly
believes that the limited and public exercise of its prosecutorial
discretion is an efficient and legal tool available to the Secretary in
the administration of the child labor provisions of the FLSA.
The modifications to the list of prohibited occupations are as
follows:
1. Prohibited Machinery (Sec. Sec. 570.33-.34)
Section 570.33(b) (old) prohibits youth 14 and 15 years of age from
employment in occupations involving the operation or tending of any
power-driven machinery other than office equipment. The Department has
always interpreted the term power-driven machinery very broadly to
include machines driven by electrical, mechanical, water, or other
power such as steam or hydraulic. The term also includes battery-
operated machines and tools, but does not apply to machines or tools
driven exclusively by human hand or foot power.
Even though this prohibition is clear and quite broad, other
sections of Reg. 3 have traditionally named certain pieces of power-
driven machinery so as to eliminate any doubt or confusion as to their
prohibited status. For example, Sec. 570.34(a)(6) (old) prohibits the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in the operation of power-driven
mowers or cutters and Sec. 570.34(b)(6) (old) prohibits the employment
of such minors in occupations that involve operating, setting up,
adjusting, cleaning, oiling, or repairing power-driven food slicers,
grinders, choppers, and cutters, and bakery-type mixers.
The Department proposed to combine Sec. Sec. 570.33(b),
570.34(a)(6), and 570.34(b)(6)--all of which address power-driven
machinery--into a single paragraph located at Sec. 570.33(e) and
expand the list of examples of prohibited equipment to include power-
driven trimmers, weed-eaters, edgers, golf carts, food processors, and
food mixers. Even though Reg. 3 for many years has prohibited the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds to operate any power-driven
equipment other than office machines, the Department routinely receives
inquiries as to the status of these individual pieces of equipment
under Reg. 3. The Department believes that by continuing to reference
certain common prohibited machinery by name, both clarity and
compliance will be increased.
The Department received six comments on this proposal. The YWN,
CLC, and AFL-CIO supported the proposal to consolidate those
subsections of Reg. 3 dealing with power-driven machinery into a
single, new subsection located at Sec. 570.33(e) and to expand the
list of prohibited machinery, with certain caveats. The YWN and the
AFL-CIO recommended that 14- and 15-year-olds also be prohibited from
using espresso makers because, as the YWN reported, these machines
involve a potential for serious burns. They create steam at a
temperature that ``clearly exceeds the temperature limits established
for prohibiting use of other equipment such as anything related to hot
oil that exceeds a temperature of 100 degrees F.'' A representative of
the Billings, Montana Job Service also questioned how the Department's
proposal addresses the employment of youth who operate espresso
machines.
The AFL-CIO and the CLC recommended that all-terrain vehicles
(ATVs) be added to the list of prohibited machinery because, as the CLC
reported ``The serious hazards of operating ATVs have been extensively
documented.'' Neither commenter provided any data or insight regarding
how extensively ATVs are used by youth in nonagricultural employment or
whether the documented hazards resulted in occupational injuries. The
CLC also recommended that the proposed Sec. 570.33 include an
introductory statement reinforcing the principle detailed in Sec.
570.32 (new) that all work that is not specifically permitted is
prohibited.
The YWN also recommended that the Department specifically list
``bladed blenders used to chop food items such as cookies or candy with
ice cream to make ice cream desserts'' as a prohibited machine in the
revised Sec. 570.33(e) as that subsection already prohibits the
operating or tending of food grinders, food choppers, and cutters (see
Sec. 570.34(b)(6) (old)).
The National Council of Chain Restaurants (the Council), which
described itself as a national trade industry group representing the
interests of the nation's largest multi-unit, multi-state chain
restaurant companies, requested that the proposed Sec. 570.33(e)
include additional language which would emphasize that 14- and 15-year-
olds would continue to be permitted to operate all those pieces of
kitchen equipment listed in Sec. 570.34(a)(7) (old) once the Final
Rule becomes effective.
The Council commented that it believes table top food processors
and food mixers pose little risk of harm to the safety and well-being
of 14- and 15-year-olds and questions why the Department continues to
prohibit such youth from operating them (see Sec. 570.34(b)(6) (old)
and Sec. 570.33(e) (new)). The Council submitted no data to
substantiate this comment.
The Director of the Labor Standards and Safety Division of the
Alaska State Department of Labor and Workforce
[[Page 28409]]
Development (DOLWD) also supported the consolidation and listing of
prohibited equipment with some exceptions. The DOLWD recommended that
14- and 15-year-olds should be permitted to operate weed eaters that
use monofilament line (but not weed eaters that use metal blades)
provided adequate eye and hearing protection are in place. That same
office recommended that such youth be permitted to operate certain
small, residential-sized washing machines and dryers when all safety
equipment is properly installed.
The Department has carefully reviewed the comments and has decided
to adopt the proposal, as presented, with one modification. The
Department will add ATVs to the list of prohibited equipment presented
in the revised Sec. 570.33(e) (new) as recommended by the AFL-CIO and
CLC. As power-driven equipment, ATVs were, and continue to be, included
in the broad prohibitions of this subsection. In addition, because ATVs
are motor vehicles as defined by Sec. 570.52(c) (old and new), 14- and
15-year-olds would be prohibited from operating such equipment under
Sec. 570.33(c) (old) and Sec. 570.33(f) (new). But because greater
clarity and protections can be realized, the Department will add ATVs
to the list of named equipment.
With regard to cooking and the use of kitchen equipment, the
Department notes that it implemented new rules concerning the types of
cooking that may be performed by 14- and 15-year-olds in its Final Rule
published in the Federal Register on December 16, 2004 (69 FR 75382).
That Final Rule limited permitted cooking duties to cooking (1) with
electric or gas grills which does not involve an open flame (see Sec.
570.34(b)(5)(i) (old) and Sec. 570.34(c) (new)), and (2) cooking with
deep fryers that are equipped with and utilize a device which
automatically lowers the baskets into the hot oil or grease and
automatically raises the baskets from the hot oil or grease (see Sec.
570.34(b)(5)(ii) (old) and Sec. 570.34(c) (new)). The 2004 Final Rule,
however, did not change the types of equipment and devices that 14- and
15-year-olds were permitted to, and continue to be permitted to,
operate in accordance with Sec. 570.34(a)(7) (old) and Sec. 570.34(i)
(new). The list of permitted equipment includes, but is not limited to,
dishwashers, toasters, dumbwaiters, popcorn poppers, milk shake
blenders, coffee grinders, automatic coffee machines, devices used to
maintain the temperature of prepared foods, and microwave ovens that do
not have the capacity to warm above 140 [deg]F.
Although there may have been some confusion among employers, the
Department has long interpreted the term toaster to mean that type of
equipment that was generally found in snack bars and lunch counters
when Reg. 3 was issued and used to toast such items as slices of bread
and English muffins. This includes such equipment as the two- or four-
slice ``pop-up'' toasters similar to those manufactured for home use
and the conveyor-type bread toaster now often found at self-service
breakfast buffets. Broilers, automatic broiler systems, high speed
ovens, and rapid toaster machines used at both quick service and full-
service restaurants to toast such items as buns, bagels, sandwiches,
and muffins--all of which operate at high temperatures, often in excess
of 500 [deg]F--are not toasters under Sec. 570.34(a)(7) (old) and
Sec. 570.34(i) (new) and minors generally must be at least 16 years of
age to operate them.
There has also been some confusion among employers as to what
constitutes a milk shake blender under Reg. 3. The Department has long
interpreted this term to mean that type of equipment that was generally
found in snack bars and lunch counters when Reg. 3 was issued and used
to prepare a ``to-order'' milk shake for an individual customer. Such
equipment required that the worker place the ice cream, milk, and
flavorings in a stainless steel mixing cup that generally has a maximum
capacity of 20 ounces. The cup was then positioned on the machine so
that the single spindle--with an aeration disk or disks mounted at the
bottom--could blend the milk shake. Some permitted milk shake blenders
had more than one spindle so multiple products could be processed
simultaneously. Most of these blenders were free standing counter-top
models while others were incorporated into other equipment such as milk
dispensers. These are the types of milk shake blenders that 14- and 15-
year-olds may operate under Reg. 3.
Except as described below, other types of blenders, mixers, and
``blixers''--used for a variety of food preparation operations
including the blending of milk shakes--continue to be prohibited to
that age group. Such prohibited equipment often have containers or
mixing chambers that exceed a 20-ounce capacity--some can accommodate
up to 60 quarts. In addition, some of this prohibited equipment, when
used to process meat or mix batter--with or without the use of special
``attachments''--may not be operated by employees under the age of 18
because of the prohibitions of HO 10 or HO 11, respectively.
The Department has also included certain countertop blenders used
to make beverages such as milk shakes, fresh fruit drinks, and
smoothies within the term milk shake blender as used in Reg. 3. Such
machines generally consist of a base motor that supports a glass jar.
The blending blades are attached, often permanently, to the bottom of
the glass jar. Operators place the glass jar on top of the base, place
the ingredients in the jar, affix the lid to the jar, press the
appropriate button or switch, and blend the product. The permitted
blenders are identical to models used in private homes, generally do
not operate at more than 600 watts, and have jar capacities that do not
exceed 8 cups (64 ounces). As with the blenders discussed above, their
operation by minors under the age of 18 is prohibited under HO 10 when
used to process meat.
For these reasons, the Department does not agree with the YWN's
understanding that the existing regulation prohibits 14- and 15-year-
olds from operating blenders that create ice cream desserts as the
Department has previously opined that this equipment is a type of
``milk shake blender'' which has long been permitted by Sec.
570.34(a)(7) (old) and will continue to be permitted by Sec. 570.34(i)
(new).
The Department also notes that Reg. 3 has for many years prohibited
young workers from operating compact power mixers or blenders, also
know as ``immersible wands'' and ``immersion blenders,'' used for such
tasks as liquefying soups and sauces and pureeing fruits, meats, and
vegetables. Such equipment is often used in kitchens and by dietary
aides at hospitals and nursing homes. The use of such equipment would
also be prohibited by HO 10 when the mixer or wand is equipped with
knives, blades, or cutting tools designed for use on meat and poultry.
The Department did not propose to prohibit, and the Final Rule does
not prohibit, 14- and 15-year-olds from operating espresso machines as
recommend by the YWN, the AFL-CIO, and the representative of the
Billings, Montana Job Service. Section 570.34(a)(7) (old) specifically
includes automatic coffee machines on the list of equipment that 14-
and 15-year-olds may operate (see Sec. 570.34(i) (new)). The
Department has previously opined that espresso makers and cappuccino
makers are types of automatic coffee machines and therefore 14- and 15-
year-olds are permitted to operate them under the provisions of Reg. 3.
The Department notes that the YWN's comment that the temperature
reached by espresso makers ``exceeds the temperature limits
[[Page 28410]]
established for prohibiting use of other equipment such as anything
related to hot oil that exceeds a temperature of 100 degrees F'' does
not comport with either the previous or revised provisions of Reg. 3.
The temperature of 100[deg] F, when presented in Sec. 570.34(a)(7)
(old) and Sec. 570.34(i) (new), does not apply to the operation of
kitchen equipment or to such permitted activities as cooking with
certain grills or deep fryers. Instead, these subsections state that
the minors are permitted to ``clean kitchen equipment (not otherwise
prohibited), remove oil or grease, pour oil or grease through filters,
and move receptacles containing hot grease or hot oil, but only when
the equipment surfaces, containers, and liquids do not exceed a
temperature of 100 [deg]F.''
The Department has decided not to adopt the Council's
recommendation to revise Reg. 3 to permit 14- and 15-year-olds to
operate table top food processors and food mixers as no such proposal
was contemplated by the NPRM and no data has been received that
demonstrates that 14- and 15-year-olds can safely operate such
equipment. The Department does, however, address the issue of older
youth operating certain counter-top mixers later in this Final Rule
with regard to HO 11.
The Department does not accept the DOLWD's recommendation that Reg.
3 be revised to permit 14- and 15-year-olds to operate certain weed-
eaters because of the potential for injury associated with the
operation of such equipment. In fact, as discussed earlier, weed-eaters
are among the equipment the Department is adding as an example of
power-driven machinery such youth are prohibited from operating (see
Sec. 570.33(e) (new)). The Department continues to be concerned about
issues involving injuries to workers resulting from flying objects,
burns, fuel safety, and improper ergonomics. In its Document
5108, Weed Trimmers Can Throw Objects and Injure Eyes, the
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission estimated that, in 1989, there
were approximately 4,600 injuries associated with power lawn trimmers
or edgers that required emergency room treatment. It reported that
about one-third of those injuries were to the eye. Nor does the
Department accept DOLWD's recommendation to allow 14- and 15-year-olds
to operate certain residential-style clothes washers and dryers. Not
only is the operation of such power-driven machinery prohibited by
Sec. 570.33(b) (old) and Sec. 570.33(e) (new), the laundering of
clothes and other materials generally constitutes a ``processing
occupation'' which is prohibited under Sec. 570.33(a) (old and new).
Finally, the Department has determined that the Final Rule provides
sufficient clarity that it is not necessary to adopt the CLC's
recommended revision to the opening sentence of Sec. 570.33 to repeat
the statement contained in Sec. 570.32 (``Employment that is not
specifically permitted is prohibited.''). For the same reason, the
Department has decided not to accept the Council's recommendation that
Sec. 570.33(e) be revised to emphasize that youth will continue to be
permitted to operate all kitchen equipment they were permitted to
operate prior to the adoption of this Final Rule, as the list of
permissible kitchen equipment is set forth in Sec. 570.34(i)(new).
2. Loading of Personal Hand Tools Onto Motor Vehicles and Riding on
Motor Vehicles (Sec. Sec. 570.33(f) and 570.34(b)(8))
Section 570.33(c) (old) prohibits the employment of 14- and 15-
year-olds in the operation of motor vehicles or service as helpers on
such vehicles. The term motor vehicle is defined in Sec. 570.52(c)(1).
The Department has interpreted the Reg. 3 prohibition regarding service
as helpers on a motor vehicle to preclude youth under the age of 16
from riding anywhere outside the passenger compartment of the motor
vehicle. Such youth may not ride in the bed of a pick-up truck, on the
running board of a van, or on the bumper of a refuse truck. This
interpretation dates back to at least the 1940 enactment of HO 2, which
prohibits 16- and 17-year-olds from serving as outside helpers on motor
vehicles.
The Department does not interpret the helper prohibition as
applying to 14- and 15-year-olds who simply ride inside a motor vehicle
as passengers and, thus, Reg. 3 permits a 14- or 15-year-old, under
certain circumstances, to ride inside the enclosed passenger
compartment of a motor vehicle operated by a driver whose employment
complies with the conditions specified in HO 2. For example, a minor
may ride in a motor vehicle to reach another work site where he or she
will perform work, to receive special training or instructions while
riding, or to meet other employees or customers of the employer. While
a 14- or 15-year old may be a passive passenger in a vehicle, that same
minor is not permitted to ride in a motor vehicle when a significant
reason for the minor being a passenger is for the purpose of performing
work in connection with the transporting--or assisting in the
transporting--of other persons or property. Such work would include,
for example, delivering items to a customer or assisting passengers
with the loading and unloading of their luggage in conjunction with the
operation of an airport shuttle van. This interpretation comports with
the provision of Sec. 570.33(f)(1) (old), which prohibits the
employment of 14- and 15-year-olds in occupations in connection with
the transportation of persons or property by highway. Performing work
in connection with the transportation of other persons or property does
not have to be the primary reason for the trip for this prohibition to
apply.
The Department proposed to include its long-standing interpretation
that prohibits 14- and 15-year-olds riding outside of motor vehicles in
Reg. 3 at Sec. 570.33(f) (new). The Department also proposed to revise
Reg. 3 at Sec. 570.34(o) (new) to permit 14- and 15-year-olds to ride
in the enclosed passenger compartments of motor vehicles, except when a
significant reason for the minors being passengers in the vehicle is
for the purpose of performing work in connection with the
transporting--or assisting in the transporting--of other persons or
property. The proposal required that each minor must have his or her
own seat in the passenger compartment, each seat must be equipped with
a seat belt or similar restraining device, and the employer must
instruct the minors that such belts or other devices must be used.
These provisions mirror the requirements of the Drive for Teen
Employment Act as contained in HO 2.
In addition, the Department's interpretation of prohibited helper
services under Sec. 570.33(c) (old), since at least the mid-1950s, has
included the loading and unloading of materials from motor vehicles
when the purpose of the operation of the vehicle is the transportation
of such materials. Section 570.33(f)(1) (old) furthers this prohibition
by banning the employment of minors in occupations in connection with
the transportation of property by highway. Section 570.34(b)(8) (old)
prohibits the employment of such youth by retail, food service, and
gasoline service establishments to load or unload goods to and from
trucks, railroad cars, or conveyors. These prohibitions are designed to
protect young workers from the hazards associated with loading docks,
motor vehicles, and receiving departments; strains from lifting and
moving heavy items; and falls and falling items. Accordingly, 14- and
15-year-olds generally have been prohibited from loading and unloading
any property (not just ``goods'') onto and from motor vehicles,
including the light personal hand tools they use in performing their
duties.
[[Page 28411]]
In 2000, the Department was requested by a municipality (the City)
to review certain aspects of the prohibitions against employing 14- and
15-year-olds to load onto and unload items from motor vehicles. The
City advised the Department that, even with the adoption of the
enforcement position that permits state and local governments to employ
minors under certain conditions, it was being forced to abandon a
youth-employment program that provided 14- and 15-year-olds with
certain jobs because of the prohibition against loading materials into
vehicles. The City specifically requested permission to allow such
minors to load and unload, onto and from motor vehicles, the light,
non-power-driven tools each youth would personally use as part of his
or her employment. The Department carefully considered this request
and, again using its prosecutorial discretion, decided that it would
not assert a violation of the child labor provisions when 14- and 15-
year-old employees of state and local governments loaded and unloaded
the light non-power-driven hand tools--such as rakes, hand-held
clippers, and spades--that they personally use as part of their
employment. The City was advised that this enforcement policy did not
extend to other prohibited transportation-related work such as the
loading or unloading of materials other than the light hand tools the
minors may use on-the-job, such as trash or garbage, or power-driven
equipment such as lawn mowers, edgers, and weed trimmers--the use of
which by this age group is prohibited under Reg. 3.
The Department proposed to revise Reg. 3 at new Sec. Sec.
570.33(f) and (k) and 570.34(k) to incorporate the enforcement position
that allows 14- and 15-year-olds to be employed to load onto and unload
from motor vehicles the light non-power-driven personal hand tools they
use as part of their employment and to make it available to all covered
employers, not just state and local governments. Such light non-power-
driven hand tools would include, but are not limited to, rakes, hand-
held clippers, shovels, and brooms, but would not include items like
lawn mowers or other power-driven lawn maintenance equipment. In
addition, such minors would be permitted to load onto and unload from
motor vehicles any personal protective equipment they themselves will
use at the work site and any personal items such as backpacks, lunch
boxes, and coats their employers allow them to take to the work site.
Such minors would not be permitted to load or unload such jobsite-
related equipment as barriers, cones, or signage.
The Department received four comments addressing the proposal
regarding riding on motor vehicles. The AFL-CIO and the DOLWD supported
this proposal as written. The YWN supported the proposal with
additional requirements. The YWN recommended that the proposed
requirements that each seat occupied by a minor be equipped with a seat
belt or similar restraining device and that the employer instruct the
minors that such belts or other device must be used so that the
employer is required to ensure that the seat belt or other device is
actually used. In addition, the YWN would require that the driver of
the vehicle transporting the minors have a valid driver's license. The
CLC objected to the Department's proposal, stating that it did not have
sufficient information on the underlying rationale for the proposed
change to adequately comment on it. The CLC did, however, recommend
that the seat restraining devices should ``be required to be
manufacturer-issued and not homemade, and the employer should be
required to `ensure,' and not just `instruct' that the restraining
devices be used by the children.''
The Department received four comments concerning the loading of
personal hand tools onto motor vehicles at Sec. 570.34(k) (new). The
AFL-CIO supported the proposal as written. The CLC again stated that it
did not have enough information to adequately comment on the proposal.
The YWN agreed with this proposal with the added requirements that
``[w]ritten permission from parent or legal guardian is required to
permit employer to transport 14- and 15-year-olds and a copy of written
permission must be maintained by employer'' and ``[a] minor cannot be
abandoned at worksite without adult supervision.'' The DOLWD supported
the proposal provided adequate safety provisions were in place. The
DOLWD stated that ``[t]hese provisions would include that the vehicle
shall not be running and must be properly secured with the wheels
blocked during any loading and unloading operations.''
After carefully considering all the comments, the Department has
decided to adopt the proposal as originally written, with one
modification and minor editorial changes. The Department noted in its
2007 NPRM that it did not interpret the Reg. 3 helper prohibitions as
applying to 14- and 15-year-olds who ride inside the enclosed passenger
compartment of a motor vehicle when driven by a driver whose employment
complies with HO 2 under specified conditions (see 72 FR 19343). The
Department believes this long-standing important safety-affecting
interpretation requiring compliance with HO 2 should be included in the
regulatory language. In addition, the Department believes that the
drivers of the vehicles transporting the young workers should, as
recommended by the YWN, hold valid state drivers' licenses.
Accordingly, the Department has added the following sentence at the end
of Sec. 570.34(o): In addition, each driver transporting the young
workers must hold a State driver's license valid for the type of
driving involved and, if the driver is under the age of 18, his or her
employment must comply with the provisions of Sec. 570.52.
While the Department appreciates the remaining safety-affecting
recommendations made by the YWN, CLC, and DOLWD, it believes the
provisions of the original proposal, when coupled with other existing
state and federal provisions dealing with the safe operation of motor
vehicles, will provide ample protections to young workers. In addition,
when drafting the proposal regarding youth riding as passive passengers
in motor vehicles, the Department looked for guidance for establishing
the criteria regarding the use of seat belts or other safety
restraining devices. The most recent guidance came from Congress with
the enactment of The Drive for Teen Employment Act, Public Law 105-334,
in 1998. This legislation added section 13(c)(6) to the FLSA, which
permits 17-year-olds to perform certain limited on-the-job driving
under very specific conditions. One such condition is that the vehicle
be equipped with a seat belt for the driver and any passengers and that
the young driver's employer has instructed the youth that the seat
belts must be used when driving the vehicle. The Department believes by
adopting in Reg. 3 the identical language contained in HO 2 (see Sec.
570.52(b)), it not only provides a high degree of protection to young
workers but also avoids potential confusion.
3. Work in Meat Coolers and Freezers (Sec. 570.34(b)(7))
Section 570.34(b)(7) (old) prohibits 14- and 15-year-olds from
working in freezers and meat coolers. Since this section's inception,
the Department has interpreted it to mean that such youth are
prohibited from working as dairy stock clerks, meat clerks, deli
clerks, produce clerks, or frozen-food stock clerks where their duties
would require them to enter and remain in the freezer or meat cooler
for prolonged periods.
[[Page 28412]]
Inventory and cleanup work, involving prolonged stays in freezers or
meat coolers, are also prohibited. On the other hand, the Department
has adopted an enforcement position since at least 1981 that counter
workers in quick service establishments or cashiers in grocery stores
whose duties require them to occasionally enter freezers only
momentarily to retrieve items are not considered to be working in the
freezers. In order to provide clarification, the Department proposed to
incorporate this long-standing interpretation into the regulations at
Sec. 570.33(i) (new).
The Department received four comments on this proposal. The Council
supported the proposal as written. The YWN not only disagreed with the
proposal but suggested that the current prohibitions detailed at Sec.
570.34(b)(7) (old) be expanded to include ``any freezer or cooler
regardless of product, including but not limited to meat, seafood,
poultry or other produce.'' The AFL-CIO supported the proposal but
suggested that employers be required to keep the door open while the
minor was inside the freezer, that the freezer door be equipped with an
emergency release mechanism to ensure the youth can escape if the door
is mistakenly shut, and that the employer provide unobstructed entry to
and egress from the freezer. The CLC also made the same three
recommendations as the AFL-CIO and stated that ``[e]ven if DOL's
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has similar rules,
these should be incorporated into the child labor regulations so that a
DOL Wage and Hour Division inspector could assert a child labor
violation rather than having the employer face two inspections, one by
the Wage and Hour Division and another by OSHA.''
The Department has carefully reviewed the comments and has decided
to adopt the proposal as originally written with a conforming
clarification in Sec. 570.34(i). Even though, under this rule, 14- and
15-year-olds may only occasionally enter freezers momentarily to
retrieve items (see Sec. 570.33(i) (new) and Sec. 570.34(i) (new)),
requiring that the door be kept open while they are inside the freezer
could be unnecessarily burdensome in that, for energy efficiency and
food sanitation, most freezers are equipped with self-closing doors. We
note, as reported by the CLC, that OSHA, which is the recognized expert
in occupational safety and health issues, already has in place
important safety standards addressing emergency release mechanisms,
panic bars, and unobstructed paths in the workplace--and that these
standards protect all workers, not just those under the age of 16. The
Department believes that all these additional safety requirements, when
coupled with the provisions of the revised Sec. 570.33(i), adequately
protect young workers who momentarily enter freezers. WHD and OSHA, as
recommended by the CLC, will continue their partnership to leverage the
education and outreach efforts and enforcement actions of each agency.
Finally, the YWN's recommendation that the proposal be expanded to
include specific items being stored in the freezer or cooler, such as
seafood and poultry, is unnecessary because, as discussed above, Sec.
570.33 is a non-exhaustive list that only sets forth common examples of
prohibited occupations.
4. Youth Peddling
The Department proposed to amend Reg. 3 and create Sec. 570.33(j)
to ban the employment of 14- and 15-year-old minors in occupations
involving youth peddling, also referred to as ``door-to-door sales''
and ``street sales.'' Controversies regarding young children conducting
commercial sales of items, often on a ``door-to-door''