In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions Regarding Remedy, Bonding, and the Public Interest, 28060-28061 [2010-11973]
Download as PDF
28060
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Notices
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
submissions should be addressed to the
Secretary, and should be received not
later than 5:15 p.m., July 15, 2010. All
written submissions must conform with
the provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8
requires that a signed original (or a copy
so designated) and fourteen (14) copies
of each document be filed. In the event
that confidential treatment of a
document is requested, at least four (4)
additional copies must be filed, in
which the confidential information
must be deleted (see the following
paragraph for further information
regarding confidential business
information). The Commission’s rules
authorize filing submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
means only to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the rules (see Handbook
on Electronic Filing Procedures, https://
www.usitc.gov/docket_services/
documents/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding
electronic filing should contact the
Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any submissions that contain
confidential business information (CBI)
must also conform with the
requirements of section 201.6 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). Section 201.6
of the rules requires that the cover of the
document and the individual pages be
clearly marked as to whether they are
the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’
version, and that the confidential
business information be clearly
identified by means of brackets. All
written submissions, except for
confidential business information, will
be made available for inspection by
interested parties.
Some or all of the CBI that the
Commission receives in this
investigation may be included in the
report that the Commission sends to the
USTR. However, any confidential
business information received by the
Commission in this investigation and
used in preparing this report will not be
published in a manner that would
reveal the operations of the firm
supplying the information.
Issued: May 13, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–11971 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–669]
In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic
Devices, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing the Same; Notice
of Commission Decision Not To
Review a Final Initial Determination
Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Request for Written Submissions
Regarding Remedy, Bonding, and the
Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review a final initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative
law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding a violation of
section 337 in the above-captioned
investigation, and is requesting written
submissions regarding remedy, bonding,
and the public interest.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 10, 2009 based on a complaint
filed on February 3, 2009, by Avago
Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte.
Ltd. of Singapore; Avago Technologies
General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; and Avago Technologies Ltd.
of San Jose, California. 74 FR 10278–79
(March 10, 2009). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the United States after importation of
certain optoelectronic devices,
components thereof, or products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,359,447 (‘‘the ‘447 patent’’)
and 5,761,229 (‘‘the ‘229 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. The complaint names a single
respondent, Emcore Corporation
(‘‘Emcore’’) of Albuquerque, New
Mexico.
On December 7, 2009, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review the ALJ’s ID
granting complainants’ motion for
summary determination on ownership
of the asserted patents.
On March 12, 2010, the ALJ issued his
final ID finding a violation of section
337 by Emcore by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
2, 3, and 5 of the ‘447 patent. The ALJ
found no violation of section 337 with
respect to the ‘229 patent. He also
issued his recommendation on remedy
and bonding during the period of
Presidential review. On March 29, 2010,
Emcore and the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed
petitions for review of the final ID. The
IA and complainants filed responses to
the petitions on April 6, 2010. The
Commission has determined not to
review the subject ID.
In connection with the final
disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may issue an order that
results in the exclusion of the subject
articles from entry into the United
States. Accordingly, the Commission is
interested in receiving written
submissions that address the form of
remedy, if any, that should be ordered.
If a party seeks exclusion of an article
from entry into the United States for
purposes other than entry for
consumption, the party should so
indicate and provide information
establishing that activities involving
other types of entry either are adversely
affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain
Devices for Connecting Computers via
Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360,
USITC Pub. No. 2843 (December 1994)
(Commission Opinion).
When the Commission contemplates
some form of remedy, it must consider
the effects of that remedy upon the
public interest. The factors the
Commission will consider include the
effect that an exclusion order and/or
cease and desist orders would have on
(1) The public health and welfare, (2)
competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 19, 2010 / Notices
that are like or directly competitive with
those that are subject to investigation,
and (4) U.S. consumers. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving written submissions that
address the aforementioned public
interest factors in the context of this
investigation.
When the Commission orders some
form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the
President, has 60 days to approve or
disapprove the Commission’s action.
See section 337(j), 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) and
the Presidential Memorandum of July
21, 2005. 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005).
During this period, the subject articles
would be entitled to enter the United
States under bond, in an amount
determined by the Commission. The
Commission is therefore interested in
receiving submissions concerning the
amount of the bond that should be
imposed if a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: Parties to the
investigation, interested government
agencies, and any other interested
parties are encouraged to file written
submissions on the issues of remedy,
the public interest, and bonding, and
such submissions should address the
recommended determination by the ALJ
on remedy and bonding. The
complainant and the IA are also
requested to submit proposed remedial
orders for the Commission’s
consideration. Complainant is also
requested to state the dates that the
patents at issue expire and the HTSUS
numbers under which the accused
articles are imported. The written
submissions and proposed remedial
orders must be filed no later than close
of business on May 24, 2010. Reply
submissions must be filed no later than
the close of business on June 1, 2010.
No further submissions on these issues
will be permitted unless otherwise
ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document and 12
true copies thereof on or before the
deadlines stated above with the Office
of the Secretary. Any person desiring to
submit a document to the Commission
in confidence must request confidential
treatment unless the information has
already been granted such treatment
during the proceedings. All such
requests should be directed to the
Secretary of the Commission and must
include a full statement of the reasons
why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is sought will be treated
accordingly. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:07 May 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in
sections 210.42–46 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
210.42–46.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 13, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–11973 Filed 5–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1070B (Review)]
Certain Tissue Paper Products From
China
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited
five-year review concerning the
antidumping duty order on certain
tissue paper products from China.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of an expedited
review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on certain tissue paper
products from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of
this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keysha Martinez (202–205–2136), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28061
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 7, 2010, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (75
FR 5115, February 1, 2010) of the
subject five-year review was adequate
and that the respondent interested party
group response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on June
3, 2010, and made available to persons
on the Administrative Protective Order
service list for this review. A public
version will be issued thereafter,
pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the
Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before June 8,
2010 and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither
a party to the five-year review nor an
interested party may submit a brief
written statement (which shall not
contain any new factual information)
pertinent to the review by June 8, 2010.
However, should the Department of
Commerce extend the time limit for its
completion of the final results of its
review, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s rules do not
authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Eagle Tissue LLC, Flower City Tissue
Mills Co., Garlock Printing & Converting, Inc.,
Putney Paper Co., Ltd., and Seaman Paper Co. of
Massachusetts, Inc. to be individually adequate.
Comments from other interested parties will not be
accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28060-28061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11973]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-669]
In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic Devices, Components
Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Commission
Decision Not To Review a Final Initial Determination Finding a
Violation of Section 337; Request for Written Submissions Regarding
Remedy, Bonding, and the Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review a final initial determination
(``ID'') of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') finding a
violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation, and is
requesting written submissions regarding remedy, bonding, and the
public interest.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 10, 2009 based on a complaint filed on February 3, 2009, by
Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; Avago
Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; and Avago
Technologies Ltd. of San Jose, California. 74 FR 10278-79 (March 10,
2009). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain
optoelectronic devices, components thereof, or products containing the
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
5,359,447 (``the `447 patent'') and 5,761,229 (``the `229 patent'').
The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint
names a single respondent, Emcore Corporation (``Emcore'') of
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
On December 7, 2009, the Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review the ALJ's ID granting complainants' motion
for summary determination on ownership of the asserted patents.
On March 12, 2010, the ALJ issued his final ID finding a violation
of section 337 by Emcore by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the `447 patent. The ALJ found no violation of
section 337 with respect to the `229 patent. He also issued his
recommendation on remedy and bonding during the period of Presidential
review. On March 29, 2010, Emcore and the Commission investigative
attorney (``IA'') filed petitions for review of the final ID. The IA
and complainants filed responses to the petitions on April 6, 2010. The
Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the
Commission may issue an order that results in the exclusion of the
subject articles from entry into the United States. Accordingly, the
Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address
the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks
exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes
other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and
provide information establishing that activities involving other types
of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For
background, see In the Matter of Certain Devices for Connecting
Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843
(December 1994) (Commission Opinion).
When the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must
consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The
factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an
exclusion order and/or cease and desist orders would have on (1) The
public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S.
economy, (3) U.S. production of articles
[[Page 28061]]
that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to
investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore
interested in receiving written submissions that address the
aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this
investigation.
When the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade
Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve
or disapprove the Commission's action. See section 337(j), 19 U.S.C.
1337(j) and the Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005. 70 FR 43251
(July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject articles would be
entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined
by the Commission. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving
submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if
a remedy is ordered.
Written Submissions: Parties to the investigation, interested
government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to
file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding, and such submissions should address the recommended
determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. The complainant and the
IA are also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the
Commission's consideration. Complainant is also requested to state the
dates that the patents at issue expire and the HTSUS numbers under
which the accused articles are imported. The written submissions and
proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business
on May 24, 2010. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the
close of business on June 1, 2010. No further submissions on these
issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
and 12 true copies thereof on or before the deadlines stated above with
the Office of the Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document
to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment
unless the information has already been granted such treatment during
the proceedings. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary
of the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why
the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the Commission is sought will be
treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in sections 210.42-46 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42-46.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 13, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-11973 Filed 5-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P