National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)-Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program-Disability Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)-Center on Knowledge Translation (KT) for Employment Research (Center), 27544-27547 [2010-11716]
Download as PDF
27544
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
Space for the teleconference meeting
is limited and you are encouraged to
register early if you plan to attend. You
may register by sending an e-mail to the
following addresses:
tracy.deanna.jones@ed.gov. Please
include your name, title, affiliation,
complete address (including internet
and e-mail, if available), and telephone
and fax numbers. If you are unable to
register electronically, you may fax your
registration information to the Advisory
Committee staff office at (202) 219–
3032. You may also contact the
Advisory Committee staff directly at
(202) 219–2099. The registration
deadline is Friday, June 4, 2010.
Records are kept for Advisory
Committee proceedings, and are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Advisory Committee on Student
Financial Assistance, Capitol Place, 80 F
Street, NW., Suite 413, Washington, DC
from the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. Information regarding the
Advisory Committee is available on the
Committee’s Web site, www.ed.gov/
ACSFA.
Dated: May 7, 2010.
William J. Goggin,
Executive Director, Advisory Committee on
Student Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010–11698 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR)—
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program—
Disability Rehabilitation Research
Project (DRRP)—Center on Knowledge
Translation (KT) for Employment
Research (Center)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.133A–5.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority for
a DRRP.
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for the
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers Program
administered by NIDRR. Specifically,
this notice proposes a priority for a
DRRP. The Assistant Secretary may use
this priority for a competition in fiscal
year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take
this action to focus research attention on
areas of national need. We intend this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
priority to improve rehabilitation
services and outcomes for individuals
with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this notice to Lynn Medley, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Room 5140, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202–2700.
If you prefer to send your comments
by e-mail, use the following address:
Lynn.Medley@ed.gov. You must include
the term ‘‘Proposed Priority for a DRRP
on KT for Employment Research
Findings’’ in the subject line of your
electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Medley. Telephone: (202) 245–
7338 or by e-mail: Lynn.Medley@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at
1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of proposed priority is in concert
with NIDRR’s Final Long-Range Plan for
FY 2005–2009 (Plan). The Plan, which
was published in the Federal Register
on February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can
be accessed on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/
about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/
policy.html.
Through the implementation of the
Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the
quality and utility of disability and
rehabilitation research; (2) foster an
exchange of expertise, information, and
training to facilitate the advancement of
knowledge and understanding of the
unique needs of traditionally
underserved populations; (3) determine
best strategies and programs to improve
rehabilitation outcomes for underserved
populations; (4) identify research gaps;
(5) identify mechanisms of integrating
research and practice; and (6)
disseminate findings.
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this notice. To ensure that
your comments have maximum effect in
developing the notice of final priority,
we urge you to identify clearly the
specific topic that each comment
addresses.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority. Please let us
know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase
potential benefits while preserving the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
effective and efficient administration of
the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in Room 5142, 550
12th Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC, time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Projects and Centers Program
is to plan and conduct research,
demonstration projects, training, and
related activities, including
international activities, to develop
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and to
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended.
DRRP Program
The purpose of the DRRP program is
to improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended, by developing
methods, procedures, and rehabilitation
technologies that advance a wide range
of independent living and employment
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities. DRRPs
carry out one or more of the following
types of activities, as specified and
defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through
350.19: research, training,
demonstration, development,
dissemination, utilization, and technical
assistance. An applicant for assistance
under this program must demonstrate in
its application how it will address, in
whole or in part, the needs of
individuals with disabilities from
minority backgrounds (34 CFR
350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant
may take to meet this requirement are
found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition,
NIDRR intends to require all DRRP
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
applicants to meet the requirements of
the General Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP)
Requirements priority that it published
in a notice of final priorities in the
Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71
FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP
program can be found at: https://
www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/
res-program.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g)
and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority:
This notice contains one proposed
priority.
Center on Knowledge Translation (KT)
for Employment Research Findings
(Center).
Background:
The employment rate for individuals
with disabilities is substantially lower
than the rate for individuals without
disabilities: 18.6 percent versus 63.3
percent, respectively, as of December
2009 (U.S. Department of Labor, 2009).
This disparity in employment rates is
across all age groups and for both men
and women (U.S. Department of Labor,
2009).
To improve the employment
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities, employers, policy makers,
vocational rehabilitation (VR)
practitioners, individuals with
disabilities, and other stakeholders need
to make use of the best available
research to inform practice and policy.
With the notable exception of a body of
experimental research that demonstrates
the effectiveness of one model practice,
the Individual Placement and Support
model of supported employment for
individuals with psychiatric disabilities
(Bond, 2004; Loprest, 2007), many
findings from research related to
improving the employment outcomes of
individuals with disabilities are
preliminary in nature. Findings from
preliminary, non-experimental research
can, however, appropriately be used to
guide further research, provide
preliminary knowledge about a problem
in the field, or direct resources and
services to groups of individuals with
the greatest needs.
NIDRR has adopted the conceptual
framework of KT to help guide its effort
to promote the effective use of research
findings. KT in the NIDRR context refers
to a multidimensional, active process of
ensuring that new knowledge and
products gained via research and
development reach practitioners,
employers, policy makers, and
individuals with disabilities; are
understood by these audiences; and are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
used to improve the employment
outcomes and participation of
individuals with disabilities in society.
KT encompasses all steps from the
creation of new knowledge to the
synthesis, dissemination, and
implementation of such knowledge
(Canadian Institutes of Health Research,
2004), and is built upon continuing
interactions and partnerships within
and between different groups of
knowledge creators and users.
Knowledge synthesis is an important
step within the KT process because it
provides an understanding of a topic
based on an integration of the relevant
body of knowledge rather than a single
research study.
Research findings related to
improving employment outcomes of
individuals with disabilities have not
been extensively and systematically
examined. Appraising and synthesizing
this research can inform practice by
providing practitioners information that
can facilitate their use of currently
available research findings and help
them distinguish between promising
practices and proven interventions.
Effective research syntheses package
information in ways that can be
understood and used appropriately by
different audiences and end users, and
educate users about the strengths or
limitations of specific findings. The
identification of the best available
research will also help highlight critical
research gaps.
While research investigating effective
KT methods and strategies has been
conducted in other contexts such as
public health and healthcare (Fixsen,
Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace,
2005; Metcalfe et al., 2001; Milner,
Estabrooks, & Humphrey, 2005;
Peterson, Rogers, Cunningham-Sabo, &
Davis, 2007; Van Duyn et al., 2007),
there has been no previous research
investigating effective approaches for
identifying and promoting the use of
research related to employment of
individuals with disabilities.
Determining which approaches and
strategies are effective will be useful in
ensuring that employment-related
knowledge is incorporated into practice
by individuals with disabilities, policy
makers, employers, and VR
practitioners.
References:
Bond, G. (2004). Supported Employment:
Evidence for an Evidence-Based Practice.
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4),
345–359.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
(2004). Knowledge translation strategy
2004–2009: Innovation in action. See
https://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/26574.html.
Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A.,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27545
Friedman, R.M., & Wallace, F. (2005).
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of
the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of
South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida
Mental Health Institute, The National
Implementation Research Network
(FMHI Publication #231).
Loprest, P. (2007). Strategic assessment of the
state of the science in research on
employment for individuals with
disabilities. Washington, DC: The Urban
Institute.
Metcalfe, C., Lewin, R., Wisher, S., Perry, S.,
Bannigan, K., & Moffett, J.K. (2001).
Barriers to implementing the evidence
base in four NHS therapies: dietitians,
occupational therapists,
physiotherapists, and speech and
language therapists. Physiotherapy,
87(8), 433–441.
Milner, F.M., Estabrooks, C.A., & Humphrey,
C. (2005). Clinical nurse educators as
agents for change: Increasing research
utilization. International Journal of
Nursing Studies, 42, 899–914.
Peterson, J.C., Rogers, E.M., CunninghamSabo, L., & Davis, S.M. (2007). A
framework for research utilization
applied to seven case studies. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33 (1S),
S21–S34.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2009). Labor force
statistics from the Current Population
Survey: Employment status and
disability status, December 2009. See
https://www.bls.gov/cps/
cpsdisability_122009.htm.
Van Duyn, M.A.S., McCrae, T., Wingrove,
B.K., Henderson, K.M., Boyd, J.K.,
Kagawa-Singer, M., et al. (2007).
Adapting evidence-based strategies to
increase physical activity among African
Americans, Hispanics, Hmong, and
Native Hawaiians: A social marketing
approach. Preventing Chronic Diseases,
4(4). See https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/
2007/oct/pdf/07_0025.pdf.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
proposes a priority for a Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)
to serve as the Center on Knowledge
Translation (KT) for Employment
Research (Center). The purpose of the
Center is to conduct systematic reviews
of research findings to identify
evidence-based practices and other
information that can be used to improve
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities, to identify research
gaps, and to investigate and promote
effective strategies to increase the
appropriate use of these findings. The
Center must conduct rigorous and
relevant research, development,
technical assistance, dissemination, and
utilization activities.
These activities must contribute to: (1)
Improved knowledge of the state of
research relevant to improving
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities; (2) improved
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
27546
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
knowledge of the findings from highquality research; (3) identification of
practices that are promising or proven to
have been effective for specific purposes
or target audiences; and (4) improved
knowledge on the part of consumers and
others not only of the research findings
but of the strengths of the findings and
the appropriate use of the research
information. These outcomes will lead
to the increased use of research-based
knowledge related to improving
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities by the following user
groups: Individuals with disabilities,
employers, policy makers, and
vocational rehabilitation (VR)
practitioners. The Center must work in
partnership with organizations
representing these user groups. These
user groups must be actively engaged in
the planning, conduct, and evaluation of
all project activities.
Under this priority, the Center must
contribute to the following outcomes:
(a) Establishment of available
employment-related knowledge that can
be used to inform behavior, practices, or
policies that improve employment
outcomes of individuals with
disabilities. The Center must contribute
to this outcome by:
(1) Systematically reviewing existing
research to identify findings that can be
used by individuals with disabilities,
employers, policy makers, and VR
practitioners to improve the
employment of individuals with
disabilities. The Center must conduct
systematic reviews of individual studies
to assess their strengths and
weaknesses; summarize findings; assess
the appropriate uses of the findings;
determine the relevance of the findings;
and make the information publicly
available. In so doing, the Center must
take into account the types of research
and stages of knowledge development
(i.e., the type of research questions
being addressed and the methods
employed) in each area.
(2) Producing syntheses on topics,
including promising and proven
practices, for which the Center
determines the research to be of
sufficient quality and relevance
pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this
proposed priority. The Center must use
standards and methods that are
appropriate for the type of research, the
stage of knowledge in the identified
areas, and its intended use to categorize,
evaluate, and synthesize the research
findings identified in paragraph (a)(1) of
this proposed priority.
(3) Suggesting priorities for a future
research agenda based on the knowledge
gaps discovered through the review of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
existing research findings in paragraph
(a)(1) of this proposed priority.
(b) Establishment of effective
approaches and strategies to promote
the appropriate use of research findings
on improving the employment of
individuals with disabilities, by
individuals with disabilities, employers,
policy makers, and VR practitioners.
The Center must contribute to this
outcome by:
(1) Conducting research on factors
impeding and contributing to the use of
research findings on employment of
individuals with disabilities by
individuals with disabilities, employers,
policy makers, and VR practitioners.
(2) Identifying, selecting, refining, and
testing approaches and strategies that
can be used to promote the appropriate
use of research findings on employment
of individuals with disabilities by
individuals with disabilities, employers,
policy makers, and VR practitioners.
These approaches and strategies must be
refined and tested within each of the
user groups. The Center must use at
least one of the areas of the synthesized
knowledge from paragraph (a)(2) of this
proposed priority as a subject for further
refinement and testing of KT approaches
and strategies.
(c) Increased utilization of approaches
and strategies determined to be effective
under paragraph (b) of this proposed
priority to promote the use of research
findings on employment of individuals
with disabilities.
The Center must contribute to this
outcome by:
(1) Providing training and technical
assistance to NIDRR-funded grantees in
the employment area to facilitate the
implementation and evaluation of these
KT approaches and strategies.
(2) Coordinating KT research and
development activities with existing
NIDRR-funded KT and employment
projects through consultation with
NIDRR project officers.
(3) Using appropriate approaches and
strategies established under paragraph
(b) of this proposed priority to
disseminate the synthesized knowledge
established under paragraph (a) of this
proposed priority to individuals with
disabilities, employers, policy makers,
and VR practitioners.
(4) Organizing and hosting a state-ofthe-science conference by the end of the
fourth project year.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final priority: We will announce the
final priority in a notice in the Federal
Register. We will determine the final
priority after considering responses to
this notice and other information
available to the Department. This notice
does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements,
definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking
requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this priority, we invite applications
through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866. Under the terms
of the order, we have assessed the
potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
this proposed regulatory action are
those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively
and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this proposed regulatory
action, we have determined that the
benefits of the proposed priority justify
the costs.
Discussion of costs and benefits:
The benefits of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Programs have been well
established over the years in that similar
projects have been completed
successfully. This proposed priority will
generate new knowledge through
research, development, dissemination,
utilization, and technical assistance
projects that will enhance the lives of
individuals with disabilities by
improving their employment outcomes.
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: May 12, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
representation and on the basis of their
broad competence in areas relating to
quality management, basic science,
renewable energy, energy policy,
environmental science, economics, and
broad public policy interests.
Membership of the Board will continue
to be determined in accordance with the
requirements of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463) and
implementing regulations.
The reestablishment of the Board has
been determined to be in the public
interest, important and vital to the
conduct of the Department’s business in
connection with the performance of
duties established by statute for the
Department of Energy. The Board will
operate in accordance with the
provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), the
General Services Administration Final
Rule on Federal Advisory Committee
Management, and other directives and
instructions issued in implementation
of those acts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Bodette, U.S. Department of
Energy, Washington, DC 20585,
telephone: 202–586–6210.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 12,
2010.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–11723 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
[FR Doc. 2010–11716 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Reestablishment of the
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board
[Project No. 13693–000]
Pursuant to section 14(a)(2)(A) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act and in
accordance with title 41 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, section 102–3, and
following consultation with the
Committee Management Secretariat of
the General Services Administration,
notice is hereby given that the Secretary
of Energy Advisory Board (the Board)
has been reestablished for a two-year
period.
The Board will provide independent,
balanced, and authoritative advice to
the Secretary of Energy on matters
concerning the Department’s
management, basic science, research,
development and technology activities;
energy and national security
responsibilities; environmental cleanup
activities; energy-related economic
activities; and the operations of the
Department.
The Board members are selected to
assure well-balanced geographical
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
South Dakota Energy, L.L.C.; Notice of
Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications
May 10, 2010.
On March 29, 2010, and revised May
5, 2010, the South Dakota Energy, L.L.C.
filed an application for a preliminary
permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the
Federal Power Act, proposing to study
the feasibility of the South Dakota
Energy Hydroelectric Project located on
the Missouri River in Gregory County,
South Dakota. The proposed project’s
existing lower reservoir is owned and
operated by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps). The sole purpose of
a preliminary permit, if issued, is to
grant the permit holder priority to file
a license application during the permit
term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27547
any land-disturbing activities or
otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners’
express permission. The proposed
project boundary is partially located on
Federal lands managed by the Corps.
The proposed project would consist of
the following: (1) A new 60-foot-high,
15,700-foot long earth embankment
dam, impounding a 450-acre upper
reservoir, with 25,250 acre-feet of
storage capacity at a normal elevation of
2,090 mean sea level; (2) a 30-footdiameter, 700-foot-long vertical shaft
concrete or steel power tunnel; (3) a 30foot-diameter, 7,100-foot-long concrete
or steel conduit; (4) an underground
powerhouse containing four 300megawatt reversible pump-turbine/
generator units, discharging into Lake
Francis Case through a 40-foot-diameter,
2,200-foot-long discharge tunnel; (5) the
existing Lake Francis Case lower
reservoir; (6) a new 20-mile-long, 345kilovolt transmission line to
interconnect with an existing
transmission line at the Fort Randall
generation facility; and (7) appurtenant
facilities.
Applicant Contact: Brent Smith, Chief
Operating Officer, South Dakota Energy,
L.L.C., 975 South State Highway, Logan,
UT 84321; phone: (435) 752–2580.
FERC Contact: Joseph C. Adamson,
202–502–8085.
Deadline for filing comments, motions
to intervene, competing applications
(without notices of intent), or notices of
intent to file competing applications: 60
days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of
intent must meet the requirements of 18
CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to
intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed
electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site (https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ferconline.asp) under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link.
For a simpler method of submitting text
only comments, click on ‘‘Quick
Comment.’’ For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov; call tollfree at (866) 208–3676; or, for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659. Although the
Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and eight copies to: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
More information about this project,
including a copy of the application, can
be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link of the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27544-27547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11716]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR)--Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers
Program--Disability Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP)--Center on
Knowledge Translation (KT) for Employment Research (Center)
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.133A-5.
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority for a DRRP.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority for the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program administered by
NIDRR. Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for a DRRP. The
Assistant Secretary may use this priority for a competition in fiscal
year (FY) 2010 and later years. We take this action to focus research
attention on areas of national need. We intend this priority to improve
rehabilitation services and outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before June 16, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this notice to Lynn Medley, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Room 5140, Potomac
Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 20202-2700.
If you prefer to send your comments by e-mail, use the following
address: Lynn.Medley@ed.gov. You must include the term ``Proposed
Priority for a DRRP on KT for Employment Research Findings'' in the
subject line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Medley. Telephone: (202) 245-7338
or by e-mail: Lynn.Medley@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of proposed priority is in
concert with NIDRR's Final Long-Range Plan for FY 2005-2009 (Plan). The
Plan, which was published in the Federal Register on February 15, 2006
(71 FR 8165), can be accessed on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/nidrr/policy.html.
Through the implementation of the Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve
the quality and utility of disability and rehabilitation research; (2)
foster an exchange of expertise, information, and training to
facilitate the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the unique
needs of traditionally underserved populations; (3) determine best
strategies and programs to improve rehabilitation outcomes for
underserved populations; (4) identify research gaps; (5) identify
mechanisms of integrating research and practice; and (6) disseminate
findings.
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments regarding this notice. To ensure
that your comments have maximum effect in developing the notice of
final priority, we urge you to identify clearly the specific topic that
each comment addresses.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority. Please let us know of any further ways we could reduce
potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the
effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this notice in Room 5142, 550 12th Street, SW., PCP,
Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC, time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and
conduct research, demonstration projects, training, and related
activities, including international activities, to develop methods,
procedures, and rehabilitation technology that maximize the full
inclusion and integration into society, employment, independent living,
family support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals
with disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe
disabilities, and to improve the effectiveness of services authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended.
DRRP Program
The purpose of the DRRP program is to improve the effectiveness of
services authorized under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
by developing methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technologies that
advance a wide range of independent living and employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities, especially individuals with the most
severe disabilities. DRRPs carry out one or more of the following types
of activities, as specified and defined in 34 CFR 350.13 through
350.19: research, training, demonstration, development, dissemination,
utilization, and technical assistance. An applicant for assistance
under this program must demonstrate in its application how it will
address, in whole or in part, the needs of individuals with
disabilities from minority backgrounds (34 CFR 350.40(a)). The
approaches an applicant may take to meet this requirement are found in
34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition, NIDRR intends to require all DRRP
[[Page 27545]]
applicants to meet the requirements of the General Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP) Requirements priority that it
published in a notice of final priorities in the Federal Register on
April 28, 2006 (71 FR 25472).
Additional information on the DRRP program can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/res-program.html#DRRP.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 764(a).
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 350.
Proposed Priority:
This notice contains one proposed priority.
Center on Knowledge Translation (KT) for Employment Research
Findings (Center).
Background:
The employment rate for individuals with disabilities is
substantially lower than the rate for individuals without disabilities:
18.6 percent versus 63.3 percent, respectively, as of December 2009
(U.S. Department of Labor, 2009). This disparity in employment rates is
across all age groups and for both men and women (U.S. Department of
Labor, 2009).
To improve the employment outcomes for individuals with
disabilities, employers, policy makers, vocational rehabilitation (VR)
practitioners, individuals with disabilities, and other stakeholders
need to make use of the best available research to inform practice and
policy. With the notable exception of a body of experimental research
that demonstrates the effectiveness of one model practice, the
Individual Placement and Support model of supported employment for
individuals with psychiatric disabilities (Bond, 2004; Loprest, 2007),
many findings from research related to improving the employment
outcomes of individuals with disabilities are preliminary in nature.
Findings from preliminary, non-experimental research can, however,
appropriately be used to guide further research, provide preliminary
knowledge about a problem in the field, or direct resources and
services to groups of individuals with the greatest needs.
NIDRR has adopted the conceptual framework of KT to help guide its
effort to promote the effective use of research findings. KT in the
NIDRR context refers to a multidimensional, active process of ensuring
that new knowledge and products gained via research and development
reach practitioners, employers, policy makers, and individuals with
disabilities; are understood by these audiences; and are used to
improve the employment outcomes and participation of individuals with
disabilities in society. KT encompasses all steps from the creation of
new knowledge to the synthesis, dissemination, and implementation of
such knowledge (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2004), and is
built upon continuing interactions and partnerships within and between
different groups of knowledge creators and users. Knowledge synthesis
is an important step within the KT process because it provides an
understanding of a topic based on an integration of the relevant body
of knowledge rather than a single research study.
Research findings related to improving employment outcomes of
individuals with disabilities have not been extensively and
systematically examined. Appraising and synthesizing this research can
inform practice by providing practitioners information that can
facilitate their use of currently available research findings and help
them distinguish between promising practices and proven interventions.
Effective research syntheses package information in ways that can be
understood and used appropriately by different audiences and end users,
and educate users about the strengths or limitations of specific
findings. The identification of the best available research will also
help highlight critical research gaps.
While research investigating effective KT methods and strategies
has been conducted in other contexts such as public health and
healthcare (Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005; Metcalfe
et al., 2001; Milner, Estabrooks, & Humphrey, 2005; Peterson, Rogers,
Cunningham-Sabo, & Davis, 2007; Van Duyn et al., 2007), there has been
no previous research investigating effective approaches for identifying
and promoting the use of research related to employment of individuals
with disabilities. Determining which approaches and strategies are
effective will be useful in ensuring that employment-related knowledge
is incorporated into practice by individuals with disabilities, policy
makers, employers, and VR practitioners.
References:
Bond, G. (2004). Supported Employment: Evidence for an Evidence-
Based Practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 345-359.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge
translation strategy 2004-2009: Innovation in action. See https://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/26574.html.
Fixsen, D.L., Naoom, S.F., Blase, K.A., Friedman, R.M., & Wallace,
F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature.
Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida
Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research
Network (FMHI Publication 231).
Loprest, P. (2007). Strategic assessment of the state of the science
in research on employment for individuals with disabilities.
Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Metcalfe, C., Lewin, R., Wisher, S., Perry, S., Bannigan, K., &
Moffett, J.K. (2001). Barriers to implementing the evidence base in
four NHS therapies: dietitians, occupational therapists,
physiotherapists, and speech and language therapists. Physiotherapy,
87(8), 433-441.
Milner, F.M., Estabrooks, C.A., & Humphrey, C. (2005). Clinical
nurse educators as agents for change: Increasing research
utilization. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 899-914.
Peterson, J.C., Rogers, E.M., Cunningham-Sabo, L., & Davis, S.M.
(2007). A framework for research utilization applied to seven case
studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33 (1S), S21-S34.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2009). Labor force statistics from the
Current Population Survey: Employment status and disability status,
December 2009. See https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsdisability_122009.htm.
Van Duyn, M.A.S., McCrae, T., Wingrove, B.K., Henderson, K.M., Boyd,
J.K., Kagawa-Singer, M., et al. (2007). Adapting evidence-based
strategies to increase physical activity among African Americans,
Hispanics, Hmong, and Native Hawaiians: A social marketing approach.
Preventing Chronic Diseases, 4(4). See https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/oct/pdf/07_0025.pdf.
Proposed Priority:
The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services proposes a priority for a Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Project (DRRP) to serve as the Center on Knowledge Translation
(KT) for Employment Research (Center). The purpose of the Center is to
conduct systematic reviews of research findings to identify evidence-
based practices and other information that can be used to improve
employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities, to identify
research gaps, and to investigate and promote effective strategies to
increase the appropriate use of these findings. The Center must conduct
rigorous and relevant research, development, technical assistance,
dissemination, and utilization activities.
These activities must contribute to: (1) Improved knowledge of the
state of research relevant to improving employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities; (2) improved
[[Page 27546]]
knowledge of the findings from high-quality research; (3)
identification of practices that are promising or proven to have been
effective for specific purposes or target audiences; and (4) improved
knowledge on the part of consumers and others not only of the research
findings but of the strengths of the findings and the appropriate use
of the research information. These outcomes will lead to the increased
use of research-based knowledge related to improving employment
outcomes for individuals with disabilities by the following user
groups: Individuals with disabilities, employers, policy makers, and
vocational rehabilitation (VR) practitioners. The Center must work in
partnership with organizations representing these user groups. These
user groups must be actively engaged in the planning, conduct, and
evaluation of all project activities.
Under this priority, the Center must contribute to the following
outcomes:
(a) Establishment of available employment-related knowledge that
can be used to inform behavior, practices, or policies that improve
employment outcomes of individuals with disabilities. The Center must
contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Systematically reviewing existing research to identify findings
that can be used by individuals with disabilities, employers, policy
makers, and VR practitioners to improve the employment of individuals
with disabilities. The Center must conduct systematic reviews of
individual studies to assess their strengths and weaknesses; summarize
findings; assess the appropriate uses of the findings; determine the
relevance of the findings; and make the information publicly available.
In so doing, the Center must take into account the types of research
and stages of knowledge development (i.e., the type of research
questions being addressed and the methods employed) in each area.
(2) Producing syntheses on topics, including promising and proven
practices, for which the Center determines the research to be of
sufficient quality and relevance pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this
proposed priority. The Center must use standards and methods that are
appropriate for the type of research, the stage of knowledge in the
identified areas, and its intended use to categorize, evaluate, and
synthesize the research findings identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
proposed priority.
(3) Suggesting priorities for a future research agenda based on the
knowledge gaps discovered through the review of existing research
findings in paragraph (a)(1) of this proposed priority.
(b) Establishment of effective approaches and strategies to promote
the appropriate use of research findings on improving the employment of
individuals with disabilities, by individuals with disabilities,
employers, policy makers, and VR practitioners.
The Center must contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Conducting research on factors impeding and contributing to the
use of research findings on employment of individuals with disabilities
by individuals with disabilities, employers, policy makers, and VR
practitioners.
(2) Identifying, selecting, refining, and testing approaches and
strategies that can be used to promote the appropriate use of research
findings on employment of individuals with disabilities by individuals
with disabilities, employers, policy makers, and VR practitioners.
These approaches and strategies must be refined and tested within each
of the user groups. The Center must use at least one of the areas of
the synthesized knowledge from paragraph (a)(2) of this proposed
priority as a subject for further refinement and testing of KT
approaches and strategies.
(c) Increased utilization of approaches and strategies determined
to be effective under paragraph (b) of this proposed priority to
promote the use of research findings on employment of individuals with
disabilities.
The Center must contribute to this outcome by:
(1) Providing training and technical assistance to NIDRR-funded
grantees in the employment area to facilitate the implementation and
evaluation of these KT approaches and strategies.
(2) Coordinating KT research and development activities with
existing NIDRR-funded KT and employment projects through consultation
with NIDRR project officers.
(3) Using appropriate approaches and strategies established under
paragraph (b) of this proposed priority to disseminate the synthesized
knowledge established under paragraph (a) of this proposed priority to
individuals with disabilities, employers, policy makers, and VR
practitioners.
(4) Organizing and hosting a state-of-the-science conference by the
end of the fourth project year.
Types of Priorities:
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final priority: We will announce the final priority in a notice in
the Federal Register. We will determine the final priority after
considering responses to this notice and other information available to
the Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing
additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this priority, we invite applications through
a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been reviewed in accordance
with Executive Order 12866. Under the terms of the order, we have
assessed the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with this proposed regulatory action
are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for administering this program effectively and
efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this proposed regulatory action, we have determined
that the benefits of the proposed priority justify the costs.
Discussion of costs and benefits:
The benefits of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects
and Centers Programs have been well established over the years in that
similar projects have been completed successfully. This proposed
priority will generate new knowledge through research, development,
dissemination, utilization, and technical assistance projects that will
enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities by improving their
employment outcomes.
[[Page 27547]]
Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 20202-2550. Telephone: (202) 245-7363.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
Electronic Access to This Document: You can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the
Internet at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister. To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
this site.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/.
Dated: May 12, 2010.
Alexa Posny,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-11716 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P