Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 27599-27600 [2010-11660]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
information collected through this SGA
will be used by DOL to ensure that
grants are awarded to the applicant best
suited to perform the functions of the
grant. Submission of this information is
required in order for the applicant to be
considered for award of this grant.
Unless otherwise specifically noted in
this announcement, information
submitted in the respondent’s
application is not considered to be
confidential.
Willie E. Harris is the grant officer
overseeing this SGA.
Signed at Washington, DC this 11th day of
May, 2010.
Eric Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–11610 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0492]
Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of issuance and
availability of Regulatory Guide 6.7,
Revision 2, ‘‘Preparation of an
Environmental Report To Support a
Rulemaking Petition Seeking an
Exemption for a RadionuclideContaining Product.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine R. Mattsen, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–
6264 or e-mail
Catherine.Mattsen@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency
Meeting
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision
to an existing guide in the agency’s
‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series
was developed to describe and make
available to the public information such
as methods that are acceptable to the
NRC staff for implementing specific
parts of the agency’s regulations,
techniques that the staff uses in
evaluating specific problems or
postulated accidents, and data that the
staff needs in its review of applications
for permits and licenses.
Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 6.7
was issued with a temporary
identification as Draft Regulatory Guide,
DG–6008. This guide provides general
procedures for the preparation of
environmental reports (ERs), that are
submitted to support a rulemaking
petition for an exemption for a
radionuclide-containing product, and it
replaces Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide
6.7, issued June 1976. Use of this
regulatory guide will help to ensure the
completeness of the information
provided in the ER, assist the staff of the
NRC and others in locating pertinent
information, and facilitate the
environmental review process.
However, the NRC does not require
conformance with the procedures in the
regulatory guide, which are provided for
guidance only.
I. Introduction
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, May
20, 2010.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Briefing on Final Rule—Parts 741
and 761 of NCUA’s Rules and
Regulations, Implementation of the
Secure and Fair Enforcement for
Mortgage Licensing Act of 2008
(S.A.F.E. Act).
2. Extension of the Temporary
Corporate Credit Union Liquidity
Guarantee Program.
3. Insurance Fund Report.
RECESS: 11 a.m.
TIME AND DATE: 11:15 a.m., Thursday,
May 20, 2010.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Member Business Loan Waiver
Appeal. Closed pursuant to Exemption
(8).
2. Consideration of Supervisory
Activities (2). Closed pursuant to some
or all of the following exemptions: (8),
(9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–11879 Filed 5–13–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
II. Further Information
In November 2009, DG–6008 was
published with a public comment
period of 60 days from the issuance of
the guide. No comments were received
and the public comment period closed
on January 8, 2010. Electronic copies of
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27599
Regulatory Guide 6.7, Revision 2 are
available through the NRC’s public Web
site under ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/.
In addition, regulatory guides are
available for inspection at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR) located at
Room O–1F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852–2738. The PDR’s
mailing address is USNRC PDR,
Washington, DC 20555–0001. The PDR
can also be reached by telephone at
(301) 415–4737 or (800) 397–4209, by
fax at (301) 415–3548, and by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Regulatory guides are not
copyrighted, and NRC approval is not
required to reproduce them.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of May, 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
/RA/
Andrea D. Valentin,
Chief, Regulatory Guide Development Branch,
Division of Engineering, Office of Nuclear
Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2010–11676 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 19b–5 and Form PILOT; SEC File No.
270–448; OMB Control No. 3235–0507.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the existing collection of information
provided for in Rule 19b–5 (17 CFR
240.19b–5) and Form PILOT (17 CFR
249.821) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (‘‘Act’’) (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 19b–5 provides a temporary
exemption from the rule-filing
requirements of Section 19(b) of the Act
(15 U.S.C. 78s(b)) to self-regulatory
organizations (‘‘SROs’’) wishing to
establish and operate pilot trading
systems. Rule 19b–5 permits an SRO to
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
27600
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 94 / Monday, May 17, 2010 / Notices
develop a pilot trading system and to
begin operation of such system shortly
after submitting an initial report on
Form PILOT to the Commission. During
operation of any such pilot trading
system, the SRO must submit quarterly
reports of the system’s operation to the
Commission, as well as timely
amendments describing any material
changes to the system. After two years
of operating such pilot trading system
under the exemption afforded by Rule
19b–5, the SRO must submit a rule
filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) (15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)) of the Act in order to
obtain permanent approval of the pilot
trading system from the Commission.
The collection of information is
designed to allow the Commission to
maintain an accurate record of all new
pilot trading systems operated by SROs
and to determine whether an SRO has
properly availed itself of the exemption
afforded by Rule 19b–5, is operating a
pilot trading system in compliance with
the Act, and is carrying out its statutory
oversight obligations under the Act.
The respondents to the collection of
information are national securities
exchanges and national securities
associations.
While there are 14 national securities
exchanges and national securities
associations that may avail themselves
of the exemption under Rule 19b–5 and
the use of Form PILOT, it is estimated
that approximately three respondents
will file a total of 3 initial reports, 12
quarterly reports, and 6 amendments on
Form PILOT per year, with an estimated
total annual response burden of 126
hours. At an average hourly cost of
$307.74, the estimated aggregate related
cost of compliance with Rule 19b–5 for
all respondents is $38,775 per year (126
burden hours multiplied by $307.74/
hour = $38,775).
Written comments are invited on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimates of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to: Charles Boucher, Director/Chief
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:36 May 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission,
c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or
send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 10, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–11660 Filed 5–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Rule 17a–8; SEC File No. 270–225; OMB
Control No. 3235–0235]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 17a–8; SEC File No. 270–225; OMB
Control No. 3235–0235.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 17a–8 (17 CFR 270.17a–8) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(the ‘‘Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 80a) is entitled
‘‘Mergers of affiliated companies.’’ Rule
17a–8 exempts certain mergers and
similar business combinations
(‘‘mergers’’) of affiliated registered
investment companies (‘‘funds’’) from
prohibitions under section 17(a) of the
Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–17(a)) on purchases
and sales between a fund and its
affiliates. The rule requires fund
directors to consider certain issues and
to record their findings in board
minutes. The rule requires the directors
of any fund merging with an
unregistered entity to approve
procedures for the valuation of assets
received from that entity. These
procedures must provide for the
preparation of a report by an
independent evaluator that sets forth the
fair value of each such asset for which
market quotations are not readily
available. The rule also requires a fund
being acquired to obtain approval of the
merger transaction by a majority of its
outstanding voting securities, except in
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
certain situations, and requires any
surviving fund to preserve written
records describing the merger and its
terms for six years after the merger (the
first two in an easily accessible place).
The average annual burden of meeting
the requirements of rule 17a–8 is
estimated to be 7 hours for each fund.
The Commission staff estimates that
each year approximately 610 funds rely
on the rule. The estimated total average
annual burden for all respondents
therefore is 4270 hours.
This estimate represents a decrease of
2170 hours from the prior estimate of
6440 hours. The decrease results from a
change in the methodology used to
estimate the number of mergers between
affiliated funds or fund portfolios.
The average cost burden of preparing
a report by an independent evaluator in
a merger with an unregistered entity is
estimated to be $15,000. The average net
cost burden of obtaining approval of a
merger transaction by a majority of a
fund’s outstanding voting securities is
estimated to be $80,000. The
Commission staff estimates that each
year approximately 0 mergers with
unregistered entities occur and
approximately 15 funds hold
shareholder votes that would not
otherwise have held a shareholder vote
to comply with State law. The total
annual cost burden of meeting these
requirements is estimated to be
$1,200,000.
The estimates of average burden hours
and average cost burdens are made
solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, and are not derived from
a comprehensive or even a
representative survey or study. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Written comments are requested on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the Commission’s estimate
of the burdens of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 94 (Monday, May 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27599-27600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11660]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 19b-5 and Form PILOT; SEC File No. 270-448; OMB Control No.
3235-0507.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 19b-5 (17 CFR 240.19b-5)
and Form PILOT (17 CFR 249.821) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (``Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office
of Management and Budget for extension and approval.
Rule 19b-5 provides a temporary exemption from the rule-filing
requirements of Section 19(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78s(b)) to self-
regulatory organizations (``SROs'') wishing to establish and operate
pilot trading systems. Rule 19b-5 permits an SRO to
[[Page 27600]]
develop a pilot trading system and to begin operation of such system
shortly after submitting an initial report on Form PILOT to the
Commission. During operation of any such pilot trading system, the SRO
must submit quarterly reports of the system's operation to the
Commission, as well as timely amendments describing any material
changes to the system. After two years of operating such pilot trading
system under the exemption afforded by Rule 19b-5, the SRO must submit
a rule filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) (15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)) of the
Act in order to obtain permanent approval of the pilot trading system
from the Commission.
The collection of information is designed to allow the Commission
to maintain an accurate record of all new pilot trading systems
operated by SROs and to determine whether an SRO has properly availed
itself of the exemption afforded by Rule 19b-5, is operating a pilot
trading system in compliance with the Act, and is carrying out its
statutory oversight obligations under the Act.
The respondents to the collection of information are national
securities exchanges and national securities associations.
While there are 14 national securities exchanges and national
securities associations that may avail themselves of the exemption
under Rule 19b-5 and the use of Form PILOT, it is estimated that
approximately three respondents will file a total of 3 initial reports,
12 quarterly reports, and 6 amendments on Form PILOT per year, with an
estimated total annual response burden of 126 hours. At an average
hourly cost of $307.74, the estimated aggregate related cost of
compliance with Rule 19b-5 for all respondents is $38,775 per year (126
burden hours multiplied by $307.74/hour = $38,775).
Written comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimates of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to: Charles Boucher, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send
an e-mail to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 10, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11660 Filed 5-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P