Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, the People's Republic of China and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 27299-27300 [2010-11704]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Notices
Shrimp from Thailand, 70 FR 5145
(February 1, 2005).
International Trade Administration
On January 4, 2010, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
[A–351–838, A–533–840, A–570–893, A–549– sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
822]
orders on certain frozen warmwater
shrimp from Brazil, India, the PRC, and
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
Thailand, pursuant to section 751(c) of
from Brazil, India, the People’s
the Act. See Initiation of Five-year
Republic of China and Thailand: Final
(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 103 (January 4,
Results of the Expedited Sunset
2010) (Notice of Initiation).1
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
The Department received a notice of
Orders
intent to participate from the Ad Hoc
Shrimp Trade Action Committee
AGENCY: Import Administration,
(petitioner) and the American Shrimp
International Trade Administration,
Processors Association (ASPA) within
Department of Commerce.
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
SUMMARY: On January 4, 2010, the
351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioner claimed
Department of Commerce (the
interested party status under section
Department) initiated sunset reviews of
771(9)(C) of the Act stating that its
the antidumping duty orders on certain
individual members are each producers
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil,
in the United States of a domestic like
India, the People’s Republic of China
product. ASPA claimed interested party
(PRC), and Thailand, pursuant to
status under section 771(9)(E) of the Act
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
stating that it is a trade association, the
as amended (the Act). The Department
majority of whose members are
has conducted expedited (120-day)
sunset reviews for these orders pursuant producers and/or processors of a
domestic like product in the United
to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a
States.
result of these sunset reviews, the
The Department received complete
Department finds that revocation of the
substantive responses to the Notice of
antidumping duty orders would be
Initiation from the domestic interested
likely to lead to continuation or
parties within the 30-day deadline
recurrence of dumping.
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FOR received no substantive responses from
FURTHER INFORMATION: Kate
respondent interested parties with
Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office 2,
respect to the orders on certain frozen
Import Administration, International
warmwater shrimp from Brazil, the PRC,
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
or Thailand, nor was a hearing
of Commerce, 14th Street and
requested. We received a substantive
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, response from the Seafood Exporters
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929.
Association of India (SEAI), which is a
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
trade association whose membership
consists of Indian producers and
Background
exporters of the subject merchandise,
On February 1, 2005, the Department
within the 30-day deadline specified in
published the antidumping duty orders
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On February
on certain frozen warmwater shrimp
12, 2010, ASPA submitted rebuttal
from Brazil, India, the PRC, and
comments to SEAI’s substantive
Thailand. See Notice of Amended Final
response. We determined that SEAI’s
Determination of Sales at Less Than
substantive response was not adequate
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
because it failed to provide the volume
Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater
and value of its members’ exports of
Shrimp from Brazil, 70 FR 5143
subject merchandise to the United
(February 1, 2005); Notice of Amended
States for several specific time periods
Final Determination of Sales at Less
enumerated by 19 CFR
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 351.218(d)(3)(iii)(B–E). See the March 2,
Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater
2010, memorandum entitled ‘‘Adequacy
Shrimp from India, 70 FR 5147
Determination in Antidumping Duty
(February 1, 2005); Notice of Amended
Sunset Review of Certain Frozen
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Warmwater Shrimp from India.’’ On
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty March 4, 2010, SEAI requested that the
Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp From the People’s Republic of
1 The Notice of Initiation also announced the
initiation of the sunset review of the antidumping
China, 70 FR 5149 (February 1, 2005);
duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp
and Notice of Amended Final
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. However,
Determination of Sales at Less Than
the results of that sunset review will be discussed
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
within a separate Federal Register notice in the
context of a full sunset review in that case.
Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27299
Department reconsider its adequacy
finding. On March 30, 2010, we notified
SEAI that we continued to find that its
substantive response was inadequate.
As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on certain frozen warmwater shrimp
from Brazil, India, the PRC, and
Thailand.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the orders
include certain frozen warmwater
shrimp and prawns whether wild–
caught (ocean harvested) or farm–raised
(produced by aquaculture), head–on or
head–off, shell–on or peeled, tail–on or
tail–off,2 deveined or not deveined,
cooked or raw, or otherwise processed
in frozen form.
The frozen warmwater shrimp and
prawn products included in the orders,
regardless of definitions in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), are products
which are processed from warmwater
shrimp and prawns through freezing
and which are sold in any count size.
The products described above may be
processed from any species of
warmwater shrimp and prawns.
Warmwater shrimp and prawns are
generally classified in, but are not
limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some
examples of the farmed and wild–
caught warmwater species include, but
are not limited to, whiteleg shrimp
(Penaeus vannemei), banana prawn
(Penaeus merguiensis), fleshy prawn
(Penaeus chinensis), giant river prawn
(Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger
prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted
shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern
brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis),
southern pink shrimp (Penaeus
notialis), southern rough shrimp
(Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern
white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue
shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western
white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis),
and Indian white prawn (Penaeus
indicus).
Frozen shrimp and prawns that are
packed with marinade, spices or sauce
are included in the scope of the orders.
In addition, food preparations, which
are not ‘‘prepared meals,’’ that contain
more than 20 percent by weight of
shrimp or prawn are also included in
the scope of the orders.
Excluded from the orders are: 1)
breaded shrimp and prawns (HTSUS
subheading 1605.20.10.20); 2) shrimp
and prawns generally classified in the
2 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, which
includes the telson and the uropods.
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
27300
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Pandalidae family and commonly
referred to as coldwater shrimp, in any
state of processing; 3) fresh shrimp and
prawns whether shell–on or peeled
(HTSUS subheadings 0306.23.00.20 and
0306.23.00.40); 4) shrimp and prawns in
prepared meals (HTSUS subheading
1605.20.05.10); 5) dried shrimp and
prawns; 6) canned warmwater shrimp
and prawns (HTSUS subheading
1605.20.10.40); 7) certain dusted
shrimp; and 8) certain battered shrimp.
Dusted shrimp is a shrimp–based
product: 1) that is produced from fresh
(or thawed–from-frozen) and peeled
shrimp; 2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ layer of
rice or wheat flour of at least 95 percent
purity has been applied; 3) with the
entire surface of the shrimp flesh
thoroughly and evenly coated with the
flour; 4) with the non–shrimp content of
the end product constituting between
four and 10 percent of the product’s
total weight after being dusted, but prior
to being frozen; and 5) that is subjected
to IQF freezing immediately after
application of the dusting layer.
Battered shrimp is a shrimp–based
product that, when dusted in
accordance with the definition of
dusting above, is coated with a wet
viscous layer containing egg and/or
milk, and par–fried.
The products covered by the orders
are currently classified under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
0306.13.00.03, 0306.13.00.06,
0306.13.00.09, 0306.13.00.12,
0306.13.00.15, 0306.13.00.18,
0306.13.00.21, 0306.13.00.24,
0306.13.00.27, 0306.13.00.40,
1605.20.10.10, and 1605.20.10.30. These
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and for customs purposes
only and are not dispositive, but rather
the written description of the scope of
the orders is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from Brazil, India, the People’s
Republic of China, and Thailand’’ from
John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration
(Decision Memo), which is hereby
adopted by, and issued concurrently
with, this notice. The issues discussed
in the Decision Memo include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the orders
were revoked. Parties can find a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
complete discussion of all issues raised
in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, room 1117 of the
main Department building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil,
India, the PRC, and Thailand would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following
weighted–average percentage margins:
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
7.94 destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
4.97
results and notice in accordance with
67.80
sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of
7.05
the Act.
Weighted–Average
Margin (percent)Brazil
Netuno Alimentos S.A./
Maricultura Netuno
S.A./ Netuno USA,
Inc. (collectively,
Netuno)* ....................
Central de
Industrializacao de
Distribuicao de
Alimentos Ltda./Cia.
Exportadora de
Produtos do Mar
(Produmar) ................
Norte Pesca ..................
All–Others Rate ............
*Netuno is the successor–in-interest to
Empresa de
Armazenagem
Frigorifica Ltda./
Maricultura Netuno
S.A.India.
Devi Sea Foods Ltd. .....
Hindustan Lever Ltd. ....
Nekkanti Seafoods Ltd.
All–Others Rate ............
Allied Pacific Group ......
Hilltop International** ....
Shantou Red Garden
Foodstuff Co., Ltd. ....
PRC–Wide Rate ...........
Separate Rate ..............
**Hilltop International is
the successor–in-interest to Yelin Enterprise Hong
Kong.Thailand4.
The Union Frozen Products Co., Ltd. .............
All–Others Rate ............
Dated: May 10, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–11704 Filed 5–13–10; 8:45 am]
4.94
15.36
9.71
10.17PRC3
80.19
82.27
27.89
112.81
53.68
5.34
5.34
3 Zhanjiang
Guolian Aquatic Products Co.,
Ltd. was excluded from the antidumping duty
order because it was found to have a de minimis margin in the less–than-fair–value (LTFV)
investigation.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
4 The LTFV margins for Thailand were
amended as a result of Implementation of the
Findings of the WTO Panel in United States–
Antidumping Measure on Shrimp From Thailand: Notice of Determination Under Section
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand, 74 FR 5638, 5639 (January
30, 2009). The Rubicon Group, comprised of
Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd., Wales & Co. Universe Limited, Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co.,
Ltd., Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd., Intersia
Foods Co., Ltd. (formerly Y2K Frozen Foods
Co., Ltd.), Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd.,
Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Thailand
Fishery Cold Storage Public Co., Ltd., Thai
International Seafood Co., Ltd., S.C.C. Frozen
Seafood Co., Ltd., Sea Wealth Frozen Food
Co., Ltd., and Thai I–Mei Frozen Foods Co.,
Ltd. were revoked from the antidumping duty
order effective January 16, 2009, also as a result of this determination. See also Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Notice of Revocation in Part, 74 FR 52452 (October 13, 2009).
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XU87
Marine Mammals; File No. 15126
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
NMFS National Marine Mammal
Laboratory, (Responsible Party: Dr. John
Bengtson, Director), Seattle, WA, has
been issued a permit to conduct
research on marine mammals.
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 93 (Friday, May 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27299-27300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11704]
[[Page 27299]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-838, A-533-840, A-570-893, A-549-822]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, the People's
Republic of China and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 4, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on
certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, India, the People's
Republic of China (PRC), and Thailand, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department has
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews for these orders pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of these sunset reviews,
the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders
would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Kate Johnson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4929.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 1, 2005, the Department published the antidumping duty
orders on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, India, the PRC,
and Thailand. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, 70 FR 5143 (February 1, 2005); Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 70
FR 5147 (February 1, 2005); Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 5149
(February 1, 2005); and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand, 70 FR 5145 (February 1, 2005).
On January 4, 2010, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on
certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, India, the PRC, and
Thailand, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of
Five-year (``Sunset'') Review, 75 FR 103 (January 4, 2010) (Notice of
Initiation).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Notice of Initiation also announced the initiation of
the sunset review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen
warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. However,
the results of that sunset review will be discussed within a
separate Federal Register notice in the context of a full sunset
review in that case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department received a notice of intent to participate from the
Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (petitioner) and the American
Shrimp Processors Association (ASPA) within the deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioner claimed interested party status
under section 771(9)(C) of the Act stating that its individual members
are each producers in the United States of a domestic like product.
ASPA claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(E) of the Act
stating that it is a trade association, the majority of whose members
are producers and/or processors of a domestic like product in the
United States.
The Department received complete substantive responses to the
Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested parties within the
30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect
to the orders on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, the PRC,
or Thailand, nor was a hearing requested. We received a substantive
response from the Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI), which
is a trade association whose membership consists of Indian producers
and exporters of the subject merchandise, within the 30-day deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). On February 12, 2010, ASPA
submitted rebuttal comments to SEAI's substantive response. We
determined that SEAI's substantive response was not adequate because it
failed to provide the volume and value of its members' exports of
subject merchandise to the United States for several specific time
periods enumerated by 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(iii)(B-E). See the March 2,
2010, memorandum entitled ``Adequacy Determination in Antidumping Duty
Sunset Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India.'' On March
4, 2010, SEAI requested that the Department reconsider its adequacy
finding. On March 30, 2010, we notified SEAI that we continued to find
that its substantive response was inadequate. As a result, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited
(120-day) sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, India, the PRC, and Thailand.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by the orders include certain frozen warmwater
shrimp and prawns whether wild-caught (ocean harvested) or farm-raised
(produced by aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shell-on or peeled,
tail-on or tail-off,\2\ deveined or not deveined, cooked or raw, or
otherwise processed in frozen form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``Tails'' in this context means the tail fan, which includes
the telson and the uropods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The frozen warmwater shrimp and prawn products included in the
orders, regardless of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS), are products which are processed from
warmwater shrimp and prawns through freezing and which are sold in any
count size.
The products described above may be processed from any species of
warmwater shrimp and prawns. Warmwater shrimp and prawns are generally
classified in, but are not limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some
examples of the farmed and wild-caught warmwater species include, but
are not limited to, whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannemei), banana prawn
(Penaeus merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis), giant river
prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon),
redspotted shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern brown shrimp
(Penaeus subtilis), southern pink shrimp (Penaeus notialis), southern
rough shrimp (Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern white shrimp
(Penaeus schmitti), blue shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western white
shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), and Indian white prawn (Penaeus
indicus).
Frozen shrimp and prawns that are packed with marinade, spices or
sauce are included in the scope of the orders. In addition, food
preparations, which are not ``prepared meals,'' that contain more than
20 percent by weight of shrimp or prawn are also included in the scope
of the orders.
Excluded from the orders are: 1) breaded shrimp and prawns (HTSUS
subheading 1605.20.10.20); 2) shrimp and prawns generally classified in
the
[[Page 27300]]
Pandalidae family and commonly referred to as coldwater shrimp, in any
state of processing; 3) fresh shrimp and prawns whether shell-on or
peeled (HTSUS subheadings 0306.23.00.20 and 0306.23.00.40); 4) shrimp
and prawns in prepared meals (HTSUS subheading 1605.20.05.10); 5) dried
shrimp and prawns; 6) canned warmwater shrimp and prawns (HTSUS
subheading 1605.20.10.40); 7) certain dusted shrimp; and 8) certain
battered shrimp. Dusted shrimp is a shrimp-based product: 1) that is
produced from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) and peeled shrimp; 2) to
which a ``dusting'' layer of rice or wheat flour of at least 95 percent
purity has been applied; 3) with the entire surface of the shrimp flesh
thoroughly and evenly coated with the flour; 4) with the non-shrimp
content of the end product constituting between four and 10 percent of
the product's total weight after being dusted, but prior to being
frozen; and 5) that is subjected to IQF freezing immediately after
application of the dusting layer. Battered shrimp is a shrimp-based
product that, when dusted in accordance with the definition of dusting
above, is coated with a wet viscous layer containing egg and/or milk,
and par-fried.
The products covered by the orders are currently classified under
the following HTSUS subheadings: 0306.13.00.03, 0306.13.00.06,
0306.13.00.09, 0306.13.00.12, 0306.13.00.15, 0306.13.00.18,
0306.13.00.21, 0306.13.00.24, 0306.13.00.27, 0306.13.00.40,
1605.20.10.10, and 1605.20.10.30. These HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and for customs purposes only and are not dispositive,
but rather the written description of the scope of the orders is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil,
India, the People's Republic of China, and Thailand'' from John M.
Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration (Decision Memo), which is
hereby adopted by, and issued concurrently with, this notice. The
issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the orders were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on
file in the Central Records Unit, room 1117 of the main Department
building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper
copy and electronic version of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil, India, the PRC, and
Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Margin (percent)
Brazil
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Netuno Alimentos S.A./Maricultura Netuno S.A./ 7.94
Netuno USA, Inc. (collectively, Netuno)*...........
Central de Industrializacao de Distribuicao de 4.97
Alimentos Ltda./Cia. Exportadora de Produtos do Mar
(Produmar).........................................
Norte Pesca......................................... 67.80
All-Others Rate..................................... 7.05
*Netuno is the successor-in-interest to Empresa de
Armazenagem Frigorifica Ltda./Maricultura Netuno
S.A.India..........................................
Devi Sea Foods Ltd.................................. 4.94
Hindustan Lever Ltd................................. 15.36
Nekkanti Seafoods Ltd............................... 9.71
All-Others Rate..................................... 10.17PRC\3\
Allied Pacific Group................................ 80.19
Hilltop International**............................. 82.27
Shantou Red Garden Foodstuff Co., Ltd............... 27.89
PRC-Wide Rate....................................... 112.81
Separate Rate....................................... 53.68
**Hilltop International is the successor-in-interest
to Yelin Enterprise Hong Kong.Thailand\4\..........
The Union Frozen Products Co., Ltd.................. 5.34
All-Others Rate..................................... 5.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Zhanjiang Guolian Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. was excluded from the
antidumping duty order because it was found to have a de minimis
margin in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation.
\4\ The LTFV margins for Thailand were amended as a result of
Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in United States-
Antidumping Measure on Shrimp From Thailand: Notice of Determination
Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial
Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From Thailand, 74 FR 5638, 5639 (January 30, 2009). The Rubicon Group,
comprised of Andaman Seafood Co., Ltd., Wales & Co. Universe Limited,
Chanthaburi Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Chanthaburi Seafoods Co., Ltd.,
Intersia Foods Co., Ltd. (formerly Y2K Frozen Foods Co., Ltd.),
Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd., Phatthana Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Thailand
Fishery Cold Storage Public Co., Ltd., Thai International Seafood Co.,
Ltd., S.C.C. Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd., Sea Wealth Frozen Food Co.,
Ltd., and Thai I-Mei Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. were revoked from the
antidumping duty order effective January 16, 2009, also as a result of
this determination. See also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From
Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review and Notice of Revocation in Part, 74 FR 52452 (October 13,
2009).
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 10, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-11704 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S