Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Administrative Review in Part, 27297-27298 [2010-11602]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Notices
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 10, 2010.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–11497 Filed 5–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–820]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from India: Notice of Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission
of Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 8, 2010, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of the antidumping duty
administrative review for certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products from
India (‘‘Indian Hot-Rolled’’). See Certain
Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products
from India: Notice of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping duty
Administrative Review, and Intent to
Rescind in Part, 75 FR 1031 (January 8,
2010) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). The
review covers one respondent, Essar
Steel Limited (‘‘Essar’’). The period of
review (‘‘POR’’) is December 1, 2007,
through November 30, 2008. We invited
parties to comment on our Preliminary
Results. We did not receive any
comments and we have made no
changes for the final results of review.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
EFFECTIVE DATE:
May 14, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Zhang or James Terpstra, AD/CVD
Operations Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1168 and (202)
482–3965, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background
On January 8, 2010, the Department
published the Preliminary Results.
Since the Preliminary Results, we have
not received any comments from
interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat
products of a rectangular shape, of a
width of 0.5 inch or greater, neither
clad, plated, nor coated with metal and
whether or not painted, varnished, or
coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances, in coils (whether or
not in successively superimposed
layers), regardless of thickness, and in
straight lengths, of a thickness of less
than 4.75 mm and of a width measuring
at least 10 times the thickness.
Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled
products rolled on four faces or in a
closed box pass, of a width exceeding
150 mm, but not exceeding 1250 mm,
and of a thickness of not less than 4
mm, not in coils and without patterns
in relief) of a thickness not less than 4.0
mm is not included within the scope of
this order.
Specifically included in the scope of
this order are vacuum-degassed, fully
stabilized (commonly referred to as
interstitial-free ‘‘IF’’)) steels, highstrength low-alloy (‘‘HSLA’’) steels, and
the substrate for motor lamination
steels. IF steels are recognized as lowcarbon steels with micro-alloying levels
of elements such as titanium or niobium
(also commonly referred to as
columbium), or both, added to stabilize
carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA
steels are recognized as steels with
micro-alloying levels of elements such
as chromium, copper, niobium,
vanadium, and molybdenum. The
substrate for motor lamination steels
contains micro-alloying levels of
elements such as silicon and aluminum.
Steel products included in the scope
of this order, regardless of definitions in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’), are products
in which: i) iron predominates, by
weight, over each of the other contained
elements; ii) the carbon content is 2
percent or less, by weight; and iii) none
of the elements listed below exceeds the
quantity, by weight, respectively
indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27297
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
All products that meet the physical
and chemical description provided
above are within the scope of this order
unless otherwise excluded. The
following products, by way of example,
are outside or specifically excluded
from the scope of this order:
* Alloy hot-rolled carbon steel
products in which at least one of the
chemical elements exceeds those listed
above (including, e.g., American Society
for Testing and Materials (‘‘ASTM’’)
specifications A543, A387, A514, A517,
A506).
* Society of Automotive Engineers
(‘‘SAE’’)/American Iron &Steel Institute
(‘‘AISI’’) grades of series 2300 and
higher.
* Ball bearings steels, as defined in
the HTSUS.
* Tool steels, as defined in the
HTSUS.
* Silico-manganese (as defined in the
HTSUS) or silicon electrical steel with
a silicon level exceeding 2.25 percent.
* ASTM specifications A710 and
A736.
* United States Steel (‘‘USS’’)
Abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR 400,
USS AR 500).
* All products (proprietary or
otherwise) based on an alloy ASTM
specification (sample specifications:
ASTM A506, A507).
* Non-rectangular shapes, not in coils,
which are the result of having been
processed by cutting or stamping and
which have assumed the character of
articles or products classified outside
chapter 72 of the HTSUS.
The merchandise subject to this order
is currently classifiable in the HTSUS at
subheadings: 7208.10.15.00,
7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00,
7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00,
7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60,
7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60,
7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60,
7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60,
7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30,
7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15,
7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90,
7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60,
7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00,
7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90,
7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00,
7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00,
7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30,
7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90.
Certain hot-rolled carbon steel covered
by this order, including: vacuumdegassed fully stabilized; high-strength
low-alloy; and the substrate for motor
lamination steel may also enter under
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
27298
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Notices
the following tariff numbers:
7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00,
7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00,
7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90,
7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30,
7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00,
7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00,
7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise
may also enter under 7210.70.30.00,
7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30,
7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and
7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
Department’s written description of the
merchandise subject to this order is
dispositive.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Rescission of Review in Part
In the Preliminary Results, we found
that the claims by Ispat Industries
Limited (‘‘Ispat’’), JSW Steel Limited
(‘‘JSW’’), and Tata Steel Limited (‘‘Tata’’)
that they made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR were
consistent with import data provided by
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’). Accordingly, we stated our
intent to rescind the administrative
review with respect to these companies.
See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 1033.
We received no comment concerning
our intent to rescind. We continue to
find that Ispat, JSW and Tata had no
shipments of hot-rolled products from
India during the POR for the final
results of this review. As such we are
rescinding the review with respect to
Ispat, JSW and Tata.
Adverse Facts Available
For the final results, we continue to
find that, by failing to provide
information we requested, Essar, did not
act to the best of its ability. Thus, we
continue to find that the use of adverse
facts available (‘‘AFA’’) is warranted for
this company under sections 776(a)(2)
and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’). See Preliminary
Results, 75 FR at 1033–1036.
As we explained in the Preliminary
Results, the rate of 28.25 percent
selected as the AFA for Essar is the
highest calculated margin from the
investigation in this case as adjusted to
account for countervailing duties
imposed to offset export subsidies.
Further, as discussed in the Preliminary
Results, we continue to find that the use
of the rate of 28.25 percent as an AFA
rate is sufficiently high to ensure that
Essar does not benefit from failing to
cooperate in our review by refusing to
respond to our questionnaire. We
consider the 28.25 percent rate
corroborated ‘‘to the extent practicable’’
in accordance with section 776(c) of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 13, 2010
Jkt 220001
Act. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at
1033–1036.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
determine find that the following
dumping margin exists for the period
December 1, 2007, through November
30, 2008.
Producer/Manufacturer
Rate Adjusted for
Export Subsidies
Essar .............................
28.25 %
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.212(b). The Department
calculated importer-specific duty
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total antidumping duties
calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the examined
sales for that importer. Where the
assessment rate is above de minimis, we
will instruct CBP to assess duties on all
entries of subject merchandise by that
importer. The Department intends to
issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days
after publication of these final results of
review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This
clarification applies to POR entries of
subject merchandise produced by
companies examined in this review (i.e.,
companies for which a dumping margin
was calculated) where the companies
did not know that their merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products from
India entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a) of
the Act: (1) for companies covered by
this review, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate listed above; (2) for previously
reviewed or investigated companies
other than those covered by this review,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
the cash deposit rate will be the
company-specific rate established for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent
period for the manufacturer of the
subject merchandise; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or the investigation, the cash deposit
rate will be 23.87 percent, the all-others
rate established in the less-than-fairvalue investigation. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the
subsequent increase in antidumping
duties by the amount of antidumping
and/or countervailing duties
reimbursed.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also is the only reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: May 5, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–11602 Filed 5–13–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 93 (Friday, May 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27297-27298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11602]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-820]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice
of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Administrative Review in Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On January 8, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') published the preliminary results of the antidumping duty
administrative review for certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products
from India (``Indian Hot-Rolled''). See Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel
Flat Products from India: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping
duty Administrative Review, and Intent to Rescind in Part, 75 FR 1031
(January 8, 2010) (``Preliminary Results''). The review covers one
respondent, Essar Steel Limited (``Essar''). The period of review
(``POR'') is December 1, 2007, through November 30, 2008. We invited
parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. We did not receive any
comments and we have made no changes for the final results of review.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 14, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang or James Terpstra, AD/CVD
Operations Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
1168 and (202) 482-3965, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 8, 2010, the Department published the Preliminary
Results. Since the Preliminary Results, we have not received any
comments from interested parties.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order is certain hot-rolled carbon
steel flat products of a rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch or
greater, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal and whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic
substances, in coils (whether or not in successively superimposed
layers), regardless of thickness, and in straight lengths, of a
thickness of less than 4.75 mm and of a width measuring at least 10
times the thickness. Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled products
rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150
mm, but not exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness of not less than 4
mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief) of a thickness not
less than 4.0 mm is not included within the scope of this order.
Specifically included in the scope of this order are vacuum-
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-free
``IF'')) steels, high-strength low-alloy (``HSLA'') steels, and the
substrate for motor lamination steels. IF steels are recognized as low-
carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium
or niobium (also commonly referred to as columbium), or both, added to
stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as
steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper,
niobium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor lamination
steels contains micro-alloying levels of elements such as silicon and
aluminum.
Steel products included in the scope of this order, regardless of
definitions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS''), are products in which: i) iron predominates, by weight,
over each of the other contained elements; ii) the carbon content is 2
percent or less, by weight; and iii) none of the elements listed below
exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
2.25 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
All products that meet the physical and chemical description
provided above are within the scope of this order unless otherwise
excluded. The following products, by way of example, are outside or
specifically excluded from the scope of this order:
* Alloy hot-rolled carbon steel products in which at least one of
the chemical elements exceeds those listed above (including, e.g.,
American Society for Testing and Materials (``ASTM'') specifications
A543, A387, A514, A517, A506).
* Society of Automotive Engineers (``SAE'')/American Iron &Steel
Institute (``AISI'') grades of series 2300 and higher.
* Ball bearings steels, as defined in the HTSUS.
* Tool steels, as defined in the HTSUS.
* Silico-manganese (as defined in the HTSUS) or silicon electrical
steel with a silicon level exceeding 2.25 percent.
* ASTM specifications A710 and A736.
* United States Steel (``USS'') Abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR
400, USS AR 500).
* All products (proprietary or otherwise) based on an alloy ASTM
specification (sample specifications: ASTM A506, A507).
* Non-rectangular shapes, not in coils, which are the result of
having been processed by cutting or stamping and which have assumed the
character of articles or products classified outside chapter 72 of the
HTSUS.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in
the HTSUS at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00,
7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60,
7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60,
7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30,
7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90,
7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00,
7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00,
7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30,
7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90. Certain hot-rolled carbon steel
covered by this order, including: vacuum-degassed fully stabilized;
high-strength low-alloy; and the substrate for motor lamination steel
may also enter under
[[Page 27298]]
the following tariff numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00,
7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90,
7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00,
7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and
7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise may also enter under 7210.70.30.00,
7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and
7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the Department's written description
of the merchandise subject to this order is dispositive.
Rescission of Review in Part
In the Preliminary Results, we found that the claims by Ispat
Industries Limited (``Ispat''), JSW Steel Limited (``JSW''), and Tata
Steel Limited (``Tata'') that they made no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR were consistent with import data provided by
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP''). Accordingly, we stated
our intent to rescind the administrative review with respect to these
companies. See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 1033. We received no
comment concerning our intent to rescind. We continue to find that
Ispat, JSW and Tata had no shipments of hot-rolled products from India
during the POR for the final results of this review. As such we are
rescinding the review with respect to Ispat, JSW and Tata.
Adverse Facts Available
For the final results, we continue to find that, by failing to
provide information we requested, Essar, did not act to the best of its
ability. Thus, we continue to find that the use of adverse facts
available (``AFA'') is warranted for this company under sections
776(a)(2) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
See Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 1033-1036.
As we explained in the Preliminary Results, the rate of 28.25
percent selected as the AFA for Essar is the highest calculated margin
from the investigation in this case as adjusted to account for
countervailing duties imposed to offset export subsidies. Further, as
discussed in the Preliminary Results, we continue to find that the use
of the rate of 28.25 percent as an AFA rate is sufficiently high to
ensure that Essar does not benefit from failing to cooperate in our
review by refusing to respond to our questionnaire. We consider the
28.25 percent rate corroborated ``to the extent practicable'' in
accordance with section 776(c) of the Act. See Preliminary Results, 75
FR at 1033-1036.
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we determine find that the following
dumping margin exists for the period December 1, 2007, through November
30, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate Adjusted for
Producer/Manufacturer Export Subsidies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Essar............................................... 28.25 %
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b). The
Department calculated importer-specific duty assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales to the total entered value of the examined sales for
that importer. Where the assessment rate is above de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to assess duties on all entries of subject merchandise by
that importer. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final
results of review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This clarification applies to POR entries of
subject merchandise produced by companies examined in this review
(i.e., companies for which a dumping margin was calculated) where the
companies did not know that their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6,
2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from India
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
publication date of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)
of the Act: (1) for companies covered by this review, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate listed above; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies other than those covered by this review, the
cash deposit rate will be the company-specific rate established for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but
the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the subject merchandise;
and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the investigation, the cash deposit
rate will be 23.87 percent, the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in the presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent increase in antidumping duties by the amount of
antidumping and/or countervailing duties reimbursed.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: May 5, 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-11602 Filed 5-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
