Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 26837-26838 [2010-11312]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–11253 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6999]
Advisory Committee on Historical
Diplomatic Documentation Notice of
Meeting
The Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation
will meet on June 7 and June 8, 2010 at
the Department of State, 2201 ‘‘C’’ Street
NW., Washington, DC.
Prior notification and a valid
government-issued photo ID (such as
driver’s license, passport, U.S.
government or military ID) are required
for entrance into the building. Members
of the public planning to attend must
notify Margaret Morrissey, Office of the
Historian (202–663–3529) no later than
June 3, 2010, to provide date of birth,
valid government-issued photo
identification number and type (such as
driver’s license number/state, passport
number/country, or US government ID
number/agency or military ID number/
branch), and relevant telephone
numbers. If you cannot provide one of
the specified forms of ID, please consult
with Margaret Morrissey for acceptable
alternative forms of picture
identification. In addition, any requests
for reasonable accommodation should
be made no later than June 1, 2010.
Requests for reasonable accommodation
received after that time will be
considered, but might be impossible to
fulfill.
The Committee will meet in open
session from 1:30 p.m. through 2:30
p.m. on Monday, June 7, 2010, in the
Department of State, 2201 ‘‘C’’ Street
NW., Washington, DC, in Conference
Room 1205, to discuss declassification
and transfer of Department of State
records to the National Archives and
Records Administration and the status
of the Foreign Relations series. The
remainder of the Committee’s sessions
from 2:45 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday,
June 7, 2010 and 9 a.m. until 12 p.m. on
Tuesday, June 8, 2010, will be closed in
accordance with Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463). The agenda calls for
discussions of agency declassification
decisions concerning the Foreign
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
Relations series and other
declassification issues. These are
matters properly classified and not
subject to public disclosure under 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public interest
requires that such activities be withheld
from disclosure. Questions concerning
the meeting should be directed to
Ambassador Edward Brynn, Executive
Secretary, Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation,
Department of State, Office of the
Historian, Washington, DC 20520,
telephone (202) 663–1123, (e-mail
history@state.gov).
Dated: April 29, 2010.
Ambassador Edward Brynn,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010–11328 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0038]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking
OMB approval, Federal agencies must
solicit public comment on proposed
collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of
previously approved collections.
This document describes an
Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB
approval.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to the U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New
Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC, 20590.
Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0038.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randolph Atkins, PhD, Contracting
Officer’s Technical Representative,
Office of Behavioral Safety Research
(NTI–131), National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26837
Ave, SE., W46–500, Washington, DC,
20590. Dr. Atkins’ phone number is
202–366–5597 and his e-mail address is
randolph.atkins@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, before an agency submits a
proposed collection of information to
OMB for approval, it must publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB’s
regulations (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an
agency must ask for public comment on
the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Investigate the Use and
Feasibility of Speed Warning Devices.
Type of Request: New information
collection request—debriefing session
follow-up with participants from an
earlier on-road instrumented vehicle
study.
OMB Clearance Number: N/A.
Form Number: This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: September 17, 2011.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: In this pilot study, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) will be
conducting on-road instrumented
vehicle data collection in the Rockville,
MD area with a total of 80 participants
who have a history of speeding
violations to examine the impact of invehicle speed warning devices on their
driving speed patterns and speeding
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
26838
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 2010 / Notices
behavior. Participants will be asked to
install a speed warning device for eight
weeks. The device will provide data on
travel speeds of participants’ vehicle
coupled with GPS information that is
linked to a database with speed limits
for various sections of roads in the study
area. This data will be automatically
transmitted from the vehicle to the
research office for data analyses. After
completing their on-road phase of the
data collection, participating drivers
will be asked to participate in a short
debriefing interview while the invehicle warning device is removed from
their vehicle. The debriefing sessions
will focus on the drivers’ subjective
experience regarding the speed warning
device—how it affected their driving
behavior, any problems experienced
with the device, how they interacted
with the device, and their opinion of the
device, as well as feedback on their
experience as a participant in the
research study. This subjective data will
be coupled with the data from their
actual driving behavior to help NHTSA
develop a better understanding of
speeding and speeders and the potential
acceptance and effectiveness of using
speed warning devices as a
countermeasure to alter the speeding
behavior of habitual speeders. The
debriefing sessions are expected to
provide data relevant to implementation
issues and concerns associated with the
device, as well as the key advantages
and disadvantages associated with the
use of this device as a countermeasure.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety
Act of l970 (23 U.S. C. 101) to carry out
a Congressional mandate to reduce the
mounting number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. Speeding is one of the
primary factors leading to vehicle
crashes. In 2008, 31% of all fatal crashes
were speeding-related. The estimated
economic cost to society for speedingrelated crashes is $40.4 billion per year.
Driving at higher speeds reduces the
ability of drivers to avoid obstacles or
react to sudden changes in the roadway
environment and increases the severity
of crashes. The pervasiveness of
speeding behavior is reflected in a
recent national survey that showed that
approximately 75% of all drivers
reported speeding in the past month. Of
particular concern are the habitual
speeders and aggressive drivers for
whom other countermeasures, such as
enforcement, licenses suspensions, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 May 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
fines, are not effective deterrents. The
data collected in this study will provide
NHTSA with important information on
a countermeasure with the potential to
address an especially challenging
segment of the driving population that
poses an inordinately high safety risk to
themselves and other drivers who share
the roads with them. In support of its
mission, NHTSA will use the findings
from these debriefing sessions to
improve current programs, interventions
and countermeasures for speeding on
our Nation’s highways in order to
achieve the greatest benefit in
decreasing crashes and resulting injuries
and fatalities, and provide informational
support to States, localities, and law
enforcement agencies that will aid them
in their efforts to reduce traffic crashes.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Each of the
80 participants in the on-road
instrumented vehicle portion of the
study will be asked to participate in an
individual debriefing session while the
speed warning device is being removed
from their vehicle. These debriefing
sessions are expected to begin in
October 2010 and continue until the last
participant completes his or her on-road
portion of the study in March 2011.
Session participation would be
voluntary. Participants will be
compensated with a $150 honorarium
for data collection, including having the
device installed on their vehicle.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—Each of the individual
debriefing sessions will last
approximately 30 minutes, which is the
approximate time it will take to remove
the speed warning device from their
vehicle. Participants will be recruited
through the MVA or insurance
companies based on their driving
history, i.e. participants will have a
prior history of multiple speeding
violations. Participants will be stratified
into 40 male and 40 female participants.
Half of each gender group recruited will
be under 30 years of age and the other
half will be 30 years of age and older.
The total estimated annual burden is
approximately 40 hours for the
debriefing sessions. The respondents
would not incur any reporting cost from
the information collection and they
would not incur any record keeping
burden or record keeping cost from the
information collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–11312 Filed 5–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236, as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2010–0023
Applicant: Union Pacific Railroad
Company, Mr. William E. Van Trump,
AVP Engineering — Signal/Comm/
TCO, 1400 Douglas Street, STOP
0910, Omaha, Nebraska 68179.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
seeks approval of the proposed
modification of the Traffic Control
System (TCS) at milepost 341.5 on the
Winnemucca Subdivision, near
Chilcoot, California. The modification
consists of the discontinuance and
removal of three controlled signals: ‘‘R,’’
‘‘LA,’’ and ‘‘LB,’’ and the replacement of
a power-operated switch with a handoperated switch and a leaving signal.
The reason given for the proposed
change is that the power operation of
the switch is no longer needed.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2010–
0023) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26837-26838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-11312]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0038]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously
approved collections.
This document describes an Information Collection Request (ICR) for
which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., Washington, DC,
20590. Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0038.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph Atkins, PhD, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-131), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE., W46-500, Washington, DC, 20590. Dr. Atkins'
phone number is 202-366-5597 and his e-mail address is
randolph.atkins@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before an agency submits
a proposed collection of information to OMB for approval, it must
publish a document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment
period and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB
has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must
ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Title: Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning
Devices.
Type of Request: New information collection request--debriefing
session follow-up with participants from an earlier on-road
instrumented vehicle study.
OMB Clearance Number: N/A.
Form Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: September 17, 2011.
Summary of the Collection of Information: In this pilot study, the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will be
conducting on-road instrumented vehicle data collection in the
Rockville, MD area with a total of 80 participants who have a history
of speeding violations to examine the impact of in-vehicle speed
warning devices on their driving speed patterns and speeding
[[Page 26838]]
behavior. Participants will be asked to install a speed warning device
for eight weeks. The device will provide data on travel speeds of
participants' vehicle coupled with GPS information that is linked to a
database with speed limits for various sections of roads in the study
area. This data will be automatically transmitted from the vehicle to
the research office for data analyses. After completing their on-road
phase of the data collection, participating drivers will be asked to
participate in a short debriefing interview while the in-vehicle
warning device is removed from their vehicle. The debriefing sessions
will focus on the drivers' subjective experience regarding the speed
warning device--how it affected their driving behavior, any problems
experienced with the device, how they interacted with the device, and
their opinion of the device, as well as feedback on their experience as
a participant in the research study. This subjective data will be
coupled with the data from their actual driving behavior to help NHTSA
develop a better understanding of speeding and speeders and the
potential acceptance and effectiveness of using speed warning devices
as a countermeasure to alter the speeding behavior of habitual
speeders. The debriefing sessions are expected to provide data relevant
to implementation issues and concerns associated with the device, as
well as the key advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of
this device as a countermeasure.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety Act of l970 (23 U.S. C. 101) to
carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the mounting number of
deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle
crashes on the Nation's highways. Speeding is one of the primary
factors leading to vehicle crashes. In 2008, 31% of all fatal crashes
were speeding-related. The estimated economic cost to society for
speeding-related crashes is $40.4 billion per year. Driving at higher
speeds reduces the ability of drivers to avoid obstacles or react to
sudden changes in the roadway environment and increases the severity of
crashes. The pervasiveness of speeding behavior is reflected in a
recent national survey that showed that approximately 75% of all
drivers reported speeding in the past month. Of particular concern are
the habitual speeders and aggressive drivers for whom other
countermeasures, such as enforcement, licenses suspensions, and fines,
are not effective deterrents. The data collected in this study will
provide NHTSA with important information on a countermeasure with the
potential to address an especially challenging segment of the driving
population that poses an inordinately high safety risk to themselves
and other drivers who share the roads with them. In support of its
mission, NHTSA will use the findings from these debriefing sessions to
improve current programs, interventions and countermeasures for
speeding on our Nation's highways in order to achieve the greatest
benefit in decreasing crashes and resulting injuries and fatalities,
and provide informational support to States, localities, and law
enforcement agencies that will aid them in their efforts to reduce
traffic crashes.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Each of the 80 participants in the on-road instrumented vehicle portion
of the study will be asked to participate in an individual debriefing
session while the speed warning device is being removed from their
vehicle. These debriefing sessions are expected to begin in October
2010 and continue until the last participant completes his or her on-
road portion of the study in March 2011. Session participation would be
voluntary. Participants will be compensated with a $150 honorarium for
data collection, including having the device installed on their
vehicle.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--Each of the individual
debriefing sessions will last approximately 30 minutes, which is the
approximate time it will take to remove the speed warning device from
their vehicle. Participants will be recruited through the MVA or
insurance companies based on their driving history, i.e. participants
will have a prior history of multiple speeding violations. Participants
will be stratified into 40 male and 40 female participants. Half of
each gender group recruited will be under 30 years of age and the other
half will be 30 years of age and older. The total estimated annual
burden is approximately 40 hours for the debriefing sessions. The
respondents would not incur any reporting cost from the information
collection and they would not incur any record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-11312 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P