Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Amendments to the By-Laws of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., 25012-25013 [2010-10645]

Download as PDF 25012 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Notices For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–10646 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P (A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–62011; File No. SR– BSECC–2010–001] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Regarding Amendments to the By-Laws of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. April 30, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on April 9, 2010, the Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation (‘‘BSECC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared primarily by BSECC. BSECC filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 2 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 3 thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the rule change from interested parties. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change BSECC is filing the proposed rule change relating to amendments to the By-Laws of its parent corporation The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. (‘‘NASDAQ OMX’’).4 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, BSECC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 4 Article Eighth, Paragraph B of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NASDAQ OMX and Section 11.3 of the By-Laws provides that proposed amendments to the By-Laws are to be reviewed by the Board of Directors of each regulatory subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX and under certain circumstances be filed with the Commission. 1 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 May 05, 2010 Jkt 220001 proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. BSECC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.5 1. Purpose NASDAQ OMX has proposed making certain amendments to its By-Laws to make improvements in its governance. In SR–NASDAQ–2010–025, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ Exchange’’) sought and received Commission approval to adopt these ByLaws changes as part of the rules of NASDAQ Exchange.6 BSECC is now submitting this filing regarding these By-Law changes. The text of the changes to the By-Laws of NASDAQ OMX can be viewed at https:// nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/ NASDAQOMXBX/pdf/bsecc-filings/ 2010/SR-BSECC-2010-001.pdf. The NASDAQ OMX By-Laws previously provided that each director receiving a plurality of the votes at any election of directors at which a quorum was present was duly elected to the board of directors (‘‘Board’’). Under Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the Board, however, any director in an uncontested election who received a greater number of votes ‘‘withheld’’ from his or her election than votes ‘‘for’’ such election was required to tender his or her resignation promptly following receipt of the certification of the stockholder vote. The NASDAQ OMX Nominating & Governance Committee (‘‘Nominating & Governance Committee’’) then considered the resignation offer and recommended to the Board whether or not to accept it. Within 90 days after the certification of the election results, the Board determined whether to accept or reject the resignation. Promptly thereafter, the Board announced its decision by means of a press release. In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees exceeded the number of directors to be elected), the unqualified plurality standard controlled. Uncontested Election: NASDAQ OMX recently amended its by-laws to adopt a majority vote 5 The Commission has modified the text of the summaries prepared by BSECC. 6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61876 (April 8, 2010), 75 FR 19436 (April 14, 2010) (SR– NASDAQ–2010–025). PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 standard. Specifically By-Law Article IV, Section 4.4 was amended to provide that in an uncontested election, directors shall be elected by holders of a majority of the votes cast at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present.7 Under the majority voting standard, a nominee who fails to receive the requisite vote will not be duly elected to the Board. The By-Laws also now require that any incumbent director nominee, as a condition to his or her nomination for reelection to the Board, must submit in writing an irrevocable resignation, the effectiveness of which is conditioned upon the director’s failure to receive the requisite vote in any uncontested election and the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. Acceptance of the resignation by the Board shall be in accordance with the policies and procedures adopted by the Board for such purpose. Contested Election: NASDAQ OMX codified its process for a contested election. The directors will continue to be elected by a plurality vote in a contested election. There is no change to the process for contested elections because if a majority voting standard were to apply in a contested election, the likelihood of a ‘‘failed election’’ (i.e., a situation in which no director receives the requisite vote) would be more pronounced. Moreover, the rationale underpinning the majority voting policy does not apply in contested elections where stockholders are offered a choice among competing candidates. Directors are elected by a plurality of votes present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting convened for that purpose. The directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected. General Election Requirements: The following requirements apply to elections of directors and were not amended. Each share of common stock has one vote,8 subject to the voting limitation in NASDAQ OMX’s certificate of incorporation that generally prohibits a holder from voting in excess of 5% of the total voting power of NASDAQ OMX.9 In addition, each note holder is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such note could be converted on the record date, subject to the 5% voting 7 NASDAQ OMX also amended its Corporate Governance Guidelines to reflect the majority vote standard for uncontested director elections. 8 NASDAQ OMX Certificate of Incorporation at Article IV, C.1(a). 9 NASDAQ OMX Certificate of Incorporation at Article IV, C.1(b)2. E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 87 / Thursday, May 6, 2010 / Notices limitation contained in the certificate of incorporation. At a meeting to elect directors, the presence of holders of a majority (greater than 50%) of NASDAQ OMX voting securities constitutes a quorum. Presence may be in-person or by proxy. Any securities not voted will not impact the vote. 2. Statutory Basis BSECC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A of the Act,10 as amended, and with Section 17A(b)(3)(A) of the Act,11 in particular, because it is designed to ensure that BSECC is so organized and has the capacity to be able to facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and to enforce compliance by its participants with the rules of the clearing agency. (B) Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition BSECC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any impact or impose any burden on competition. (C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments relating to the proposed rule change were not and are not intended to be solicited or received. BSECC will notify the Commission of any written comments received by BSECC. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 13 thereunder because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. At any time within sixty days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is 10 15 U.S.C. 78q–1. U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(A). 12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 11 15 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:53 May 05, 2010 Jkt 220001 necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–BSECC–2010–001 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Elizabeth M. Murphy, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BSECC–2010–001. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of BSECC and on BSECC’s Web site at https:// nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/ NASDAQOMXBX/pdf/bsecc-filings/ 2010/SR-BSECC-2010-001.pdf. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 25013 Number SR–BSECC–2010–001 and should be submitted on or before May 27, 2010. For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2010–10645 Filed 5–5–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–62004; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2010–27] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Mid-Point Passive Liquidity Order April 29, 2010. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on April 21, 2010, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the operation of its Mid-Point Passive Liquidity Order (‘‘MPL Order’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https:// www.nyse.com, at the Exchange’s principal office, on the Commission’s Web site at https://www.sec.gov and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 87 (Thursday, May 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25012-25013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62011; File No. SR-BSECC-2010-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange Clearing 
Corporation; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 
Rule Change Regarding Amendments to the By-Laws of The NASDAQ OMX 
Group, Inc.

April 30, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on April 9, 2010, the Boston 
Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation (``BSECC'') filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule 
change described in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been 
prepared primarily by BSECC. BSECC filed the proposal pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \2\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \3\ 
thereunder so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the 
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the rule change from interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    BSECC is filing the proposed rule change relating to amendments to 
the By-Laws of its parent corporation The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. 
(``NASDAQ OMX'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Article Eighth, Paragraph B of the Restated Certificate of 
Incorporation of NASDAQ OMX and Section 11.3 of the By-Laws provides 
that proposed amendments to the By-Laws are to be reviewed by the 
Board of Directors of each regulatory subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX and 
under certain circumstances be filed with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, BSECC included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. BSECC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections (A), 
(B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of these 
statements.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries 
prepared by BSECC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ OMX has proposed making certain amendments to its By-Laws to 
make improvements in its governance. In SR-NASDAQ-2010-025, The NASDAQ 
Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ Exchange'') sought and received Commission 
approval to adopt these By-Laws changes as part of the rules of NASDAQ 
Exchange.\6\ BSECC is now submitting this filing regarding these By-Law 
changes. The text of the changes to the By-Laws of NASDAQ OMX can be 
viewed at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXBX/pdf/bsecc-filings/2010/SR-BSECC-2010-001.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61876 (April 8, 2010), 
75 FR 19436 (April 14, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NASDAQ OMX By-Laws previously provided that each director 
receiving a plurality of the votes at any election of directors at 
which a quorum was present was duly elected to the board of directors 
(``Board''). Under Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by the 
Board, however, any director in an uncontested election who received a 
greater number of votes ``withheld'' from his or her election than 
votes ``for'' such election was required to tender his or her 
resignation promptly following receipt of the certification of the 
stockholder vote. The NASDAQ OMX Nominating & Governance Committee 
(``Nominating & Governance Committee'') then considered the resignation 
offer and recommended to the Board whether or not to accept it. Within 
90 days after the certification of the election results, the Board 
determined whether to accept or reject the resignation. Promptly 
thereafter, the Board announced its decision by means of a press 
release. In a contested election (i.e., where the number of nominees 
exceeded the number of directors to be elected), the unqualified 
plurality standard controlled.
    Uncontested Election:
    NASDAQ OMX recently amended its by-laws to adopt a majority vote 
standard. Specifically By-Law Article IV, Section 4.4 was amended to 
provide that in an uncontested election, directors shall be elected by 
holders of a majority of the votes cast at any meeting for the election 
of directors at which a quorum is present.\7\ Under the majority voting 
standard, a nominee who fails to receive the requisite vote will not be 
duly elected to the Board. The By-Laws also now require that any 
incumbent director nominee, as a condition to his or her nomination for 
reelection to the Board, must submit in writing an irrevocable 
resignation, the effectiveness of which is conditioned upon the 
director's failure to receive the requisite vote in any uncontested 
election and the Board's acceptance of the resignation. Acceptance of 
the resignation by the Board shall be in accordance with the policies 
and procedures adopted by the Board for such purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NASDAQ OMX also amended its Corporate Governance Guidelines 
to reflect the majority vote standard for uncontested director 
elections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Contested Election:
    NASDAQ OMX codified its process for a contested election. The 
directors will continue to be elected by a plurality vote in a 
contested election. There is no change to the process for contested 
elections because if a majority voting standard were to apply in a 
contested election, the likelihood of a ``failed election'' (i.e., a 
situation in which no director receives the requisite vote) would be 
more pronounced. Moreover, the rationale underpinning the majority 
voting policy does not apply in contested elections where stockholders 
are offered a choice among competing candidates. Directors are elected 
by a plurality of votes present in person or represented by proxy at a 
meeting convened for that purpose. The directors who receive the 
greatest number of votes cast will be elected.
    General Election Requirements:
    The following requirements apply to elections of directors and were 
not amended. Each share of common stock has one vote,\8\ subject to the 
voting limitation in NASDAQ OMX's certificate of incorporation that 
generally prohibits a holder from voting in excess of 5% of the total 
voting power of NASDAQ OMX.\9\ In addition, each note holder is 
entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common 
stock into which such note could be converted on the record date, 
subject to the 5% voting

[[Page 25013]]

limitation contained in the certificate of incorporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ NASDAQ OMX Certificate of Incorporation at Article IV, 
C.1(a).
    \9\ NASDAQ OMX Certificate of Incorporation at Article IV, 
C.1(b)2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At a meeting to elect directors, the presence of holders of a 
majority (greater than 50%) of NASDAQ OMX voting securities constitutes 
a quorum. Presence may be in-person or by proxy. Any securities not 
voted will not impact the vote.
2. Statutory Basis
    BSECC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
Section 17A of the Act,\10\ as amended, and with Section 17A(b)(3)(A) 
of the Act,\11\ in particular, because it is designed to ensure that 
BSECC is so organized and has the capacity to be able to facilitate the 
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions 
and to enforce compliance by its participants with the rules of the 
clearing agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    BSECC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any 
impact or impose any burden on competition.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the 
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change were not and 
are not intended to be solicited or received. BSECC will notify the 
Commission of any written comments received by BSECC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective upon filing 
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \13\ thereunder because the proposed rule change does not (i) 
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on competition; 
and (iii) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the 
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. At 
any time within sixty days of the filing of the proposed rule change, 
the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to 
the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the 
public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-BSECC-2010-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Elizabeth 
M. Murphy, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSECC-2010-001. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for web site 
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between 
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be 
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of BSECC 
and on BSECC's Web site at https://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXBX/pdf/bsecc-filings/2010/SR-BSECC-2010-001.pdf.

All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission 
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You 
should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSECC-2010-001 
and should be submitted on or before May 27, 2010.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10645 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.