In the Matter of Certain Large Scale Integrated Circuit Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 24742-24743 [2010-10494]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24742
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices
ecology, an assessment of current
threats to the Mexican wolf in the wild,
and an overview and assessment of
current conservation and recovery
efforts. However, the assessment is not
intended to serve as a revised recovery
plan for the Mexican wolf. The
assessment does not contain recovery
criteria, site-specific management
actions, or time and cost estimates, the
three statutorily required elements of a
recovery plan (16 U.S.C. 1533(f)(1)(B)),
nor does it contain recommendations for
the future of our Mexican wolf program
in the southwest. Social and economic
aspects of wolf conservation are not
addressed in the document. It is a
nonregulatory document intended
solely as a compilation of current
scientific information relevant to
Mexican wolf conservation that may be
used by any interested party. We intend
to use the document as one of many
information sources guiding our
continuing conservation and recovery
efforts in the southwest.
We made the draft conservation
assessment available for public review
and comment for 60 days (74 FR 913,
January 9, 2009). We also conducted a
peer review of the assessment during
this time. After consideration of public
and peer review comments, we made
revisions to the assessment and provide
the final document to the public with
this notice.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 16, 2010.
Benjamin N. Tuggle,
Regional Director, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2010–10470 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–716]
In the Matter of Certain Large Scale
Integrated Circuit Semiconductor
Chips and Products Containing Same;
Notice of Investigation
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
April 1, 2010, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Panasonic
Corporation, Ltd. of Japan. The
complaint alleges violations of section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:02 May 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain large scale
integrated circuit semiconductor chips
and products containing same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,933,364 and 6,834,336.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and cease and desist
orders.
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2746.
ADDRESSES:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 28, 2010, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain large scale
integrated circuit semiconductor chips
or products containing the same that
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
infringe one or more of claims 1 and
4–6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,933,364 and
claims 18–21, 24–27, and 30–32 of U.S.
Patent 6,834,336, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Panasonic
Corporation, Ltd., 1006 Kadoma,
Kadoma City, Osaka 571–8501, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501
William Cannon Drive West,
Austin, Texas 78735.
Freescale Semiconductor Japan Ltd.,
ARCO Tower 15F, 1–8–1, ShimoMeguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153–
0064, Japan.
Freescale Semiconductor, Xiqing
Integrated Semiconductor,
Manufacturing Site, No. 15 Xinghua
Road, Xiqing Economic
Development Area, Tianjin, China
300381.
Freescale Semiconductor, Innovation
Center, Zhangjiang Building 20F
Unit A, No. 560 Songtao Road,
Pudong New District, Shanghai
210203, China.
Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn.
Bhd., NO. 2 Jalan SS 8/2, Free
Industrial Zone, Sungai Way, 47300
Petaling Jaya, Selengor, Malaysia.
Freescale Semiconductor Pte. Ltd., 7
Changi South Street 2, #03–00,
Singapore 486415.
Freescale Semiconductor Taiwan Ltd.,
6F, Unit 6, 66, San-Chong Road,
Taipei City 11560, Taiwan.
Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North
Main Street, Mansfield, Texas
76063.
Premier Farnell Corporation d/b/a
Newark, 7061 East Pleasant Valley,
Independence, Ohio 44131.
Motorola Inc., 1303 East Algonquin
Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 5, 2010 / Notices
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 29, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–10494 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2010).
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–715]
In the Matter of Certain Game
Controllers; Notice of Investigation
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
April 1, 2010, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Microsoft
Corporation of Redmond, Washington.
A supplement was filed on April 15,
2010. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain game controllers by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.
D521,015; D522,011; D547,763;
D581,422; D563,480; and D565,668. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:02 May 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–2734.
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 28, 2010, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain game controllers
that infringe U.S. Patent No. D521,015;
U.S. Patent No. D522,011; U.S. Patent
No. D547,763; U.S. Patent No. D581,422;
U.S. Patent No. D563,480; and U.S.
Patent No. D565,668, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
24743
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Microsoft
Corporation, One Microsoft Way,
Redmond, WA 98052.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Datel Design and Development Inc., 33
N. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, FL
33755. Datel Design and Development
Ltd., Stafford Road, Stone, Staffordshire,
ST15 ODG, United Kingdom.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Lisa A. Murray, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 29, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–10501 Filed 5–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24742-24743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-10494]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-716]
In the Matter of Certain Large Scale Integrated Circuit
Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing Same; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on April 1, 2010, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. of Japan. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain large scale integrated circuit semiconductor
chips and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,933,364 and 6,834,336. The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2746.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on April 28, 2010, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain large scale
integrated circuit semiconductor chips or products containing the same
that infringe one or more of claims 1 and 4-6 of U.S. Patent No.
5,933,364 and claims 18-21, 24-27, and 30-32 of U.S. Patent 6,834,336,
and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Panasonic Corporation, Ltd., 1006 Kadoma,
Kadoma City, Osaka 571-8501, Japan.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 William Cannon Drive West, Austin,
Texas 78735.
Freescale Semiconductor Japan Ltd., ARCO Tower 15F, 1-8-1, Shimo-
Meguro, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0064, Japan.
Freescale Semiconductor, Xiqing Integrated Semiconductor, Manufacturing
Site, No. 15 Xinghua Road, Xiqing Economic Development Area, Tianjin,
China 300381.
Freescale Semiconductor, Innovation Center, Zhangjiang Building 20F
Unit A, No. 560 Songtao Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 210203,
China.
Freescale Semiconductor Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., NO. 2 Jalan SS 8/2, Free
Industrial Zone, Sungai Way, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selengor, Malaysia.
Freescale Semiconductor Pte. Ltd., 7 Changi South Street 2,
03-00, Singapore 486415.
Freescale Semiconductor Taiwan Ltd., 6F, Unit 6, 66, San-Chong Road,
Taipei City 11560, Taiwan.
Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North Main Street, Mansfield, Texas
76063.
Premier Farnell Corporation d/b/a Newark, 7061 East Pleasant Valley,
Independence, Ohio 44131.
Motorola Inc., 1303 East Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Stephen R. Smith, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
[[Page 24743]]
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 29, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-10494 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
