Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety, 22317-22320 [2010-9739]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Dated: March 30, 2010.
Alberta Mills,
Acting Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–7667 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
23 CFR Parts 1200 and 1300
and the word WARNING shall precede
the warning statements at each location
where warnings are provided and shall
not be less than 0.2 in. (5 mm) high. The
remainder of the text shall be in letters
not less than 0.1 in. (2.5 mm) high
except as specified in 8.4.2.
(ii) [Reserved]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
[Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0054]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Small Business Impacts of
Motor Vehicle Safety
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review;
Request for comments.
SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks comments on
the economic impact of its regulations
on small entities. As required by section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we
are attempting to identify rules that may
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
We also request comments on ways to
make these regulations easier to read
and understand. The focus of this notice
is rules that specifically relate to
passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers,
incomplete vehicles, motorcycles, and
motor vehicle equipment.
DATES: You should submit comments
early enough to ensure that Docket
Management receives them not later
than June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2010–0054] by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information see the Comments heading
of the Supplementary Information
section of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
EP28AP10.013
(13) Instead of complying with section
8.4.2.1 of ASTM F 2194–07a ε1, comply
with the following:
(i) Infants have suffocated in gaps
between extra padding and side of the
bassinet/cradle and on soft bedding. Use
only the pad provided by manufacturer.
NEVER add a pillow, comforter, or
another mattress for padding.
(ii) [Reserved]
(14) In addition to the changes to
ASTM F 2194–07aε1 in paragraph
(b)(13), comply with the following:
(i) 8.4.2.2 The words ‘‘SUFFOCATION
HAZARD’’ shall be bold face type not
less than 0.2 in.
(5 mm) high. The words ‘‘Infants have
suffocated’’ shall be in characters whose
upper case is not less than 0.16 in.
(4 mm) high. The remainder of the
warning statement shall be standard
type style whose upper case shall be at
least 0.1 in. (2.5 mm) high.
(ii) [Reserved]
EP28AP10.012
(G) 7.9.7 Repeat 7.9.1 to 7.9.6 with
the Newborn CAMI Dummy.
(iii) 7.10 Fabric Release Test
Methods for Enclosed Openings.
(A) 7.10.1 Assemble and place the
bassinet/cradle in the manufacturers use
position.
(B) 7.10.2 With the torso test probe
attached to a force gauge, place the
small end of the probe against the fabric
inside wall of the product and any
structural elements in any locations
deemed most likely to fail.
(C) 7.10.3 Apply a 20 lb force to the
probe over a period of 5 seconds and
hold for an additional 5 seconds.
(D) 7.10.4 Upon completion of
7.10.3, if an opening occurs in a
location, other than the location being
tested, release the probe from the
original test location and repeat 7.10.3
at this additional location without
adjusting the fabric.
(E) 7.10.5 If the product has a
removable cover, unfasten all fasteners
and/or snaps and repeat 7.10.2 to 7.10.4.
(F) 7.10.6 Repeat 7.10.1 to 7.10.5 in
all manufacturers recommended use
positions. For multiple use products,
the test shall be performed in all
possible use modes.
(12) Instead of complying with section
8.3.1 of ASTM F 2194–07a ε1, comply
with the following:
(i) 8.3.1 In the warning statements,
the safety alert symbol
22317
22318
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of
Regulatory Analysis, Office of
Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590
(telephone 202–366–2584, fax 202–366–
3189).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354),
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), requires
agencies to conduct periodic reviews of
final rules that have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small business entities. The
purpose of the reviews is to determine
whether such rules should be continued
without change, or should be amended
or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to
minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial
number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation
(DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22,
1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each
operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12
months. Appendix D contained DOT’s
10-year review plan for all of its existing
regulations. On November 24, 2008,
NHTSA published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 71401) a revised 10-year
review plan for its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA, ‘‘we’’) has
divided its rules into 10 groups by
subject area. Each group will be
reviewed once every 10 years,
undergoing a two-stage process–an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For
purposes of these reviews, a year will
coincide with the fall-to-fall publication
schedule of the Semiannual Regulatory
Agenda. The newly revised 10-year plan
will assess years 9 and 10 of the old
plan in years 1 and 2 of the new plan.
Year 1 (2008) began in the fall of 2008
and will end in the fall of 2009; Year 2
(2009) will begin in the fall of 2009 and
will end in the fall of 2010; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will
request public comment on and analyze
each of the rules in a given year’s group
to determine whether any rule has a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities and, thus,
requires review in accordance with
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. In each fall’s Regulatory Agenda,
we will publish the results of the
analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have
subparts, or other discrete sections of
rules that do have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, we will announce that we will
be conducting a formal section 610
review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will
determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen
its impact on small entities. We will
consider: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) the nature of complaints or
comments received from the public; (3)
the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent
to which the rule overlaps, duplicates,
or conflicts with other federal rules or
with state or local government rules;
and (5) the length of time since the rule
has been evaluated or the degree to
which technology, economic conditions,
or other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule. At the end of the
Review Year, we will publish the results
of our review. The following table
shows the 10-year analysis and review
schedule:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 REVIEWS
Year
1 ..................
2 ..................
3 ..................
4 ..................
5 ..................
6 ..................
7 ..................
8 ..................
9 ..................
10 ................
Regulations to be reviewed
49
23
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
571.223 through 571.500, and parts 575 and 579 ..........................................................
parts 1200 and 1300 ........................................................................................................
parts 501 through 526 and 571.213 ................................................................................
571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 .........................................................
571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.138 and 571.139 ......................................
parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 ..........................................................
571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588 .....................................................
571.201 through 571.212 .................................................................................................
571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 ......................................................................
parts 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts .......................................................
C. Regulations Under Analysis
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
During Year 2, we will continue to
conduct a preliminary assessment of the
following sections of 23 CFR parts 1200
and 1300:
Section
1200
1204
1205
1206
1208
1210
1215
Title
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Analysis year
Uniform procedures for State highway safety programs.
[Reserved].
Highway safety programs; determinations of effectiveness.
Rules of procedure for invoking sanctions under the Highway Safety Act of 1966.
National minimum drinking age.
Operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated minors.
Use of safety belts—compliance and transfer-of-funds procedures.
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Review year
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Section
Title
1225 ...................
1235 ...................
1240 ...................
1250 ...................
1251 ...................
1252 ...................
1270 ...................
1275 ...................
1313 ...................
1327 ...................
1335 ...................
1340 ...................
1345 ...................
1346–1349 .........
1350 ...................
1351–1399 .........
Operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated persons.
Uniform system for parking for persons with disabilities.
Safety incentive grants for use of seat belts—allocations based on seat belt use rates.
Political subdivision participation in State highway safety programs.
State Highway Safety Agency.
State matching of planning and administration costs.
Open container laws.
Repeat intoxicated driver laws.
Incentive grant criteria for alcohol-impaired driving prevention programs.
Procedures for participating in and receiving information from the National Driver Register Problem Driver Pointer System.
State highway safety data improvements.
Uniform criteria for State observational surveys of seat belt use.
Incentive grant criteria for occupant protection programs.
[Reserved].
Incentive grant criteria for motorcycle safety program.
[Reserved].
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
We are seeking comments on whether
any requirements in 23 CFR parts 1200
and 1300 have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ include small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000.
Business entities are generally defined
as small businesses by Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for
the purposes of receiving Small
Business Administration (SBA)
assistance. Size standards established by
SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed
either in number of employees or
annual receipts in millions of dollars,
unless otherwise specified. The number
of employees or annual receipts
indicates the maximum allowed for a
concern and its affiliates to be
considered small. If your business or
organization is a small entity and if any
of the requirements in 23 CFR parts
1200 and 1300 have a significant
economic impact on your business or
organization, please submit a comment
to explain how and to what degree these
rules affect you, the extent of the
economic impact on your business or
organization, and why you believe the
economic impact is significant.
If the agency determines that there is
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, it
will ask for comment in a subsequent
notice during the Review Year on how
these impacts could be reduced without
reducing safety.
includes consideration of the following
questions:
• Have we organized the material to
suit the public’s needs?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
• Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rule easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
If you have any responses to these
questions, please include them in your
comments on this document.
II. Plain Language
How do I prepare and submit
comments?
A. Background and Purpose
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Executive Order 12866 and the
President’s memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all
rules in plain language. Application of
the principles of plain language
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22319
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610
reviews, we will be performing plain
language reviews over a ten-year period
on a schedule consistent with the
section 610 review schedule. We will
review 23 CFR parts 1200 and 1300 to
determine if these regulations can be
reorganized and/or rewritten to make
them easier to read, understand, and
use. We encourage interested persons to
submit draft regulatory language that
clearly and simply communicates
regulatory requirements, and other
recommendations, such as for putting
information in tables that may make the
regulations easier to use.
Comments
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) We
established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a
concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data
Quality Act, in order for substantive
data to be relied upon and used by the
agency, it must meet the information
quality standards set forth in the OMB
and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines.
Accordingly, we encourage you to
consult the guidelines in preparing your
comments. OMB’s guidelines may be
accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT’s
guidelines may be accessed at https://
dmses.dot.gov/submit/
DataQualityGuidelines.pdf.
How can I be sure that my comments
were received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit two copies,
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
22320
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you
should include a cover letter setting
forth the information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the agency consider late
comments?
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with PROPOSALS
How can I read the comments submitted
by other people?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES. The
hours of the Docket are indicated above
in the same location.
You may also see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) at https://
regulations.gov.
(2) FDMS provides two basic methods
of searching to retrieve dockets and
docket materials that are available in the
system: (a) ‘‘Quick Search’’ to search
using a full-text search engine, or (b)
‘‘Advanced Search,’’ which displays
various indexed fields such as the
docket name, docket identification
number, phase of the action, initiating
office, date of issuance, document title,
document identification number, type of
document, Federal Register reference,
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the
advanced search may be searched
independently or in combination with
other fields, as desired. Each search
yields a simultaneous display of all
available information found in FDMS
that is relevant to the requested subject
or topic.
(3) You may download the comments.
However, since the comments are
imaged documents, instead of word
processing documents, the ‘‘pdf’’
versions of the documents are word
searchable.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
16:02 Apr 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for the National
Center for Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010–9739 Filed 4–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2201
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Regulations Implementing the
Freedom of Information Act
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and
Health Review Commission (OSHRC) is
proposing to revise its regulations
implementing the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The proposed
regulations have been updated to reflect
the amendments to the FOIA from the
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our
National Government Act of 2007
(OPEN Government Act), as well as
changes in OSHRC’s own policies and
procedures.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: OSHRC encourages
electronic submission of comments. You
may submit comments by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: regsdocket@oshrc.gov.
Include ‘‘FOIA PROPOSED
RULEMAKING’’ in the subject line of
the message.
• Fax: (202) 606–5417.
• Mail: 1120 20th Street, NW., 9th
Floor, Washington, DC 20036–3457.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mailing address.
Instructions: All submissions must
include your name, return address, and
e-mail address, if applicable. Please
clearly label submissions as ‘‘FOIA
PROPOSED RULEMAKING.’’ If you
submit comments by e-mail, you will
receive a confirmation e-mail from the
system indicating that we have received
your submission. If, in response to your
comments submitted via e-mail, you do
not receive a confirmation e-mail within
five working days, please contact us
directly at (202) 606–5410.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer D. Marr, FOIA Public Liaison,
or Robert M. Kahn, Office of the General
Counsel, via telephone: (202) 606–5410,
or via e-mail: jmarr@oshrc.gov or
rkahn@oshrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
I. Background
OSHRC proposes several substantive
and technical revisions to its regulations
implementing the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552,
as amended) that fall within two general
categories. First, OSHRC proposes
modifying its existing FOIA regulations
to reflect the amendments to the FOIA
contained in the OPEN Government Act,
Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat. 2524.
The OPEN Government Act amended
various FOIA administrative
procedures, such as when an agency
may toll the statutory time for
responding to FOIA requests and how to
indicate exemptions authorizing
deletion of materials under the FOIA on
the responsive record.
Second, as a result of the Chief FOIA
Officer’s review of OSHRC’s FOIA
operations, OSHRC proposes to revise
its regulations to further clarify its
policies and procedures relating to the
processing of FOIA requests and the
administration of its FOIA operations.
These proposed revisions include
changes to the description of the
OSHRC reading rooms and to OSHRC
fee policies.
Accordingly, OSHRC proposes to
revise its regulations implementing the
FOIA and put them out for public
comment. The specific amendments that
OSHRC proposes to each section of 29
CFR part 2201 are discussed hereafter in
regulatory sequence.
II. Proposed Regulatory Revisions
In 29 CFR 2201.3, OSHRC proposes
revising the description of the Chief
FOIA Officer’s duties in paragraph (a) to
reflect the more detailed description of
those duties set forth under the OPEN
Government Act. 5 U.S.C. 552(k).
Additionally, OSHRC proposes adding a
description of the FOIA Public Liaison’s
duties in paragraph (c) to reflect the
responsibilities described in the OPEN
Government Act. 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(B)(ii), (l). In paragraph (d)
OSHRC proposes minor revisions to the
FOIA Service Center’s contact
information. OSHRC also proposes
revising paragraph (d) to add
information about status requests
provided by the FOIA Service Center. 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(7)(B).
In 29 CFR 2201.4, OSHRC proposes
revising paragraph (c) to clarify the type
of records publicly available in the eFOIA Reading Room and where to
access them. OSHRC proposes changing
paragraph (d) to explain the procedures
for using OSHRC’s on-site e-FOIA
Reading Room. OSHRC also proposes
revising its definition of ‘‘Representative
of the news media, or news media
requester’’ in paragraph (e) to reflect the
E:\FR\FM\28APP1.SGM
28APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22317-22320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9739]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
23 CFR Parts 1200 and 1300
[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0054]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of
Motor Vehicle Safety
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations
on small entities. As required by section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we are attempting to identify rules that may have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
We also request comments on ways to make these regulations easier to
read and understand. The focus of this notice is rules that
specifically relate to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles,
trucks, buses, trailers, incomplete vehicles, motorcycles, and motor
vehicle equipment.
DATES: You should submit comments early enough to ensure that Docket
Management receives them not later than June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2010-0054] by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information see the Comments heading of the Supplementary
Information section of this document. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to https://
[[Page 22318]]
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of
Regulatory Analysis, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590
(telephone 202-366-2584, fax 202-366-3189).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), requires agencies to conduct periodic
reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the
reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22, 1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D contained DOT's
10-year review plan for all of its existing regulations. On November
24, 2008, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (73 FR 71401) a
revised 10-year review plan for its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, ``we'')
has divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will
be reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process-an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year
will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. The newly revised 10-year plan will
assess years 9 and 10 of the old plan in years 1 and 2 of the new plan.
Year 1 (2008) began in the fall of 2008 and will end in the fall of
2009; Year 2 (2009) will begin in the fall of 2009 and will end in the
fall of 2010; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and
analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether
any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall's Regulatory Agenda, we
will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections
of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal
section 610 review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We
will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of
complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of
the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or
conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government
rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or
the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors
have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the end of the Review
Year, we will publish the results of our review. The following table
shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Section 610 Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulations to be
Year reviewed Analysis year Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................... 49 CFR 571.223 2008 2009
through 571.500,
and parts 575 and
579.
2................... 23 CFR parts 1200 2009 2010
and 1300.
3................... 49 CFR parts 501 2010 2011
through 526 and
571.213.
4................... 49 CFR 571.131, 2011 2012
571.217, 571.220,
571.221, and
571.222.
5................... 49 CFR 571.101 2012 2013
through 571.110,
and 571.135,
571.138 and
571.139.
6................... 49 CFR parts 529 2013 2014
through 578,
except parts 571
and 575.
7................... 49 CFR 571.111 2014 2015
through 571.129
and parts 580
through 588.
8................... 49 CFR 571.201 2015 2016
through 571.212.
9................... 49 CFR 571.214 2016 2017
through 571.219,
except 571.217.
10.................. 49 CFR parts 591 2017 2018
through 595 and
new parts and
subparts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Regulations Under Analysis
During Year 2, we will continue to conduct a preliminary assessment
of the following sections of 23 CFR parts 1200 and 1300:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1200.......................... Uniform procedures for State highway
safety programs.
1204.......................... [Reserved].
1205.......................... Highway safety programs; determinations
of effectiveness.
1206.......................... Rules of procedure for invoking
sanctions under the Highway Safety Act
of 1966.
1208.......................... National minimum drinking age.
1210.......................... Operation of motor vehicles by
intoxicated minors.
1215.......................... Use of safety belts--compliance and
transfer-of-funds procedures.
[[Page 22319]]
1225.......................... Operation of motor vehicles by
intoxicated persons.
1235.......................... Uniform system for parking for persons
with disabilities.
1240.......................... Safety incentive grants for use of seat
belts--allocations based on seat belt
use rates.
1250.......................... Political subdivision participation in
State highway safety programs.
1251.......................... State Highway Safety Agency.
1252.......................... State matching of planning and
administration costs.
1270.......................... Open container laws.
1275.......................... Repeat intoxicated driver laws.
1313.......................... Incentive grant criteria for alcohol-
impaired driving prevention programs.
1327.......................... Procedures for participating in and
receiving information from the National
Driver Register Problem Driver Pointer
System.
1335.......................... State highway safety data improvements.
1340.......................... Uniform criteria for State observational
surveys of seat belt use.
1345.......................... Incentive grant criteria for occupant
protection programs.
1346-1349..................... [Reserved].
1350.......................... Incentive grant criteria for motorcycle
safety program.
1351-1399..................... [Reserved].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in 23 CFR parts
1200 and 1300 have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. ``Small entities'' include small businesses,
not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated
and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000. Business entities are generally defined
as small businesses by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code,
for the purposes of receiving Small Business Administration (SBA)
assistance. Size standards established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are
expressed either in number of employees or annual receipts in millions
of dollars, unless otherwise specified. The number of employees or
annual receipts indicates the maximum allowed for a concern and its
affiliates to be considered small. If your business or organization is
a small entity and if any of the requirements in 23 CFR parts 1200 and
1300 have a significant economic impact on your business or
organization, please submit a comment to explain how and to what degree
these rules affect you, the extent of the economic impact on your
business or organization, and why you believe the economic impact is
significant.
If the agency determines that there is a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, it will ask for
comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these
impacts could be reduced without reducing safety.
II. Plain Language
A. Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the President's memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language.
Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration
of the following questions:
Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
If you have any responses to these questions, please include them
in your comments on this document.
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing
plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent
with the section 610 review schedule. We will review 23 CFR parts 1200
and 1300 to determine if these regulations can be reorganized and/or
rewritten to make them easier to read, understand, and use. We
encourage interested persons to submit draft regulatory language that
clearly and simply communicates regulatory requirements, and other
recommendations, such as for putting information in tables that may
make the regulations easier to use.
Comments
How do I prepare and submit comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.)
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your comments, including the
attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under
ADDRESSES.
Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet
the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/reproducible.html. DOT's
guidelines may be accessed at https://dmses.dot.gov/submit/DataQualityGuidelines.pdf.
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit two copies,
[[Page 22320]]
from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you should include a cover letter
setting forth the information specified in our confidential business
information regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the agency consider late comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are
indicated above in the same location.
You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments
on the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://regulations.gov.
(2) FDMS provides two basic methods of searching to retrieve
dockets and docket materials that are available in the system: (a)
``Quick Search'' to search using a full-text search engine, or (b)
``Advanced Search,'' which displays various indexed fields such as the
docket name, docket identification number, phase of the action,
initiating office, date of issuance, document title, document
identification number, type of document, Federal Register reference,
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the advanced search may be
searched independently or in combination with other fields, as desired.
Each search yields a simultaneous display of all available information
found in FDMS that is relevant to the requested subject or topic.
(3) You may download the comments. However, since the comments are
imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf''
versions of the documents are word searchable.
Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
Marilena Amoni,
Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2010-9739 Filed 4-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P