Petition To Modify an Exemption of a Previously Approved Antitheft Device; Porsche, 22174-22175 [2010-9704]
Download as PDF
22174
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 27, 2010 / Notices
59. Novus Operating, LLC, Pad ID:
NorthFork 1H, ABR–20100158,
Brookfield Township, Tioga County,
Pa.; Consumptive Use of up to 1.000
mgd; Approval Date: January 28, 2010.
Authority: Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509
et seq., 18 CFR parts 806, 807, and 808.
Dated: April 16, 2010.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–9654 Filed 4–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. AB 415 (Sub-No. 2X)]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad
Company—Abandonment Exemption—
in Ontonagon and Houghton Counties,
MI
On April 9, 2010, Escanaba & Lake
Superior Railroad Company (ELS) filed
with the Surface Transportation Board
(Board) a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502
for exemption from the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 10903 to abandon approximately
42.93 miles of rail line in Ontonagon
and Houghton Counties, Mich.,
extending between milepost 408.02 at
Ontonagon and milepost 365.09 at
Sidnaw. The line traverses United States
Postal Service Zip Codes 49948, 49953,
and 49961, and includes the stations of
Ontonagon at milepost 408.0, Mass at
milepost 388.8, Rockland at milepost
396.1, Rosseau at milepost 383.2, Pori at
milepost 381.2 and Frost at milepost
373.1.
The line does contain federally
granted rights-of-way. Any
documentation in the possession of ELS
will be made available promptly to
those requesting it.
The interest of railroad employees
will be protected by the conditions set
forth in Oregon Short Line Railroad and
The Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch
Between Firth and Ammon, In Bingham
and Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360
I.C.C. 91 (1979).
By issuance of this notice, the Board
is instituting an exemption proceeding
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final
decision will be issued on or before July
28, 2010. ELS has requested that its
petition be given expedited
consideration.
Any offer of financial assistance
(OFA) under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) will
be due no later than 10 days after
service of a decision granting the
petition for exemption. Each OFA must
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Apr 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
be accompanied by a $1,500 filing fee.
See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
All interested persons should be
aware that, following abandonment of
rail service and salvage of the line, the
line may be suitable for other public
use, including interim trail use. Any
request for a public use condition under
49 CFR 1152.28 or for trail use/rail
banking under 49 CFR 1152.29 will be
due no later than May 12, 2010. Each
trail request must be accompanied by a
$250 filing fee. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(27).
All filings in response to this notice
must refer to Docket No. AB 415 (SubNo. 2X) and must be sent to: (1) Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001; and (2)
Keith G. O’Brien, 2401 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Suite 300, Washington,
DC 20037. Replies to the petition are
due on or before May 12, 2010.
Persons seeking further information
concerning abandonment procedures
may contact the Board’s Office of Public
Assistance, Governmental Affairs and
Compliance at (202) 245–0238 or refer
to the full abandonment or
discontinuance regulations at 49 CFR
part 1152. Questions concerning
environmental issues may be directed to
the Board’s Section of Environmental
Analysis (SEA) at (202) 245–0305.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
An environmental assessment (EA) (or
environmental impact statement (EIS), if
necessary) prepared by SEA will be
served upon all parties of record and
upon any agencies or other persons who
commented during its presentation.
Other interested persons may contact
SEA to obtain a copy of the EA (or EIS).
EAs in these abandonment proceedings
normally will be made available within
60 days of the filing of the petition. The
deadline for submission of comments on
the EA generally will be within 30 days
of its service.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: April 20, 2010.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–9676 Filed 4–23–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition To Modify an Exemption of a
Previously Approved Antitheft Device;
Porsche
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of a petition to modify an
exemption of a previously approved
antitheft device.
SUMMARY: On April 20, 2009, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) granted in full
Porsche Cars North America’s (Porsche)
petition for an exemption in accordance
with § 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard for the Porsche Panamera
vehicle line beginning with model year
(MY 2010). On February 4, 2010,
Porsche submitted a petition to modify
its previously approved exemption for
the Porsche Panamera vehicle line
beginning with model year (MY) 2012.
NHTSA is granting Porsche’s petition to
modify the exemption in full because it
has determined that the modified device
is also likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with model
year (MY) 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Standards, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Ballard’s telephone number is (202)
366–0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
20, 2009, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting in full
a petition from Porsche for an
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR 541) for the Panamera
vehicle line beginning with its MY 2010
vehicles. The Porsche Panamera is
equipped with a passive antitheft device
(see 74 FR 10837) and an audible and
visible alarm.
On February 4, 2010, Porsche
submitted a petition to modify the
previously approved exemption for the
Panamera vehicle line. This notice
grants in full Porsche’s petition to
modify the exemption for the Panamera
vehicle line. Porsche’s submission is a
complete petition, as required by 49
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 27, 2010 / Notices
CFR 543.9(d), in that it meets the
general requirements contained in 49
CFR 543.5 and the specific content
requirements of 49 CFR 543.6. Porsche’s
petition provides a detailed description
and diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device proposed for
installation beginning with the 2012
model year.
The MY 2010 passive antitheft device
installed on the Porsche Panamera
includes a microprocessor-based
immobilizer system, electronic ignition
switch, transponder key, remote control
unit, alarm/central locking control unit,
optional keyless entry system and
electronic parking brake. Porsche stated
that the central locking system works in
conjunction with the audible and visible
alarm. Locking the doors with the
ignition key, the remote control or a
door switch (with the keyless entry
option) will activate the audible and
visible alarm. An ultrasonic sensor in
the alarm system will monitor the doors,
rear luggage compartment, front deck
lid, fuel filler door, and interior
movement. The horn will sound and the
lights will flash if there is any detection
of unauthorized use. Porsche stated that
its immobilizer prevents the engine
management system and steering system
from functioning when the system is
engaged. The immobilizer is
automatically activated when the key is
removed from the ignition switch
assembly, or the optional special keyless
entry keycard exits the vehicle with the
driver. The immobilizer then returns to
its normal ‘‘off’’ state, where engine
starting, operation, and steering are
inhibited. Starting the engine and
operation of the vehicle will be allowed
only when the correct code is sent to the
control unit by using the correct key in
the ignition switch, or by having the
correct keyless entry keycard within the
occupant compartment of the car. The
ignition key contains a radio signal
transponder which signals the control
unit to allow steering and the engine to
start. With the keyless entry system,
operation of the vehicle is allowed
when the ignition key is substituted
with the special keycard that contains a
radio signal transmitter similar to the
transponder in the standard ignition
key.
Porsche also stated that the Panamera
line is equipped with an electronic
steering column lock and an
electronically activated parking brake
which is integrated into the vehicle’s
antitheft device. If the control unit does
not receive the correct code from the
ignition key or keycard, the parking
brake will remain activated and the
vehicle cannot be towed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:09 Apr 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
In its 2012 modification, Porsche
stated that it proposes to delete the
electronic steering column lock
equipped on the exempted vehicle line
because the steering column lock is
considered redundant by the electronic
parking brake that is standard
equipment on the line. Porsche
proposes to delete the electronic
steering lock feature beginning with its
MY 2012 vehicles. Porsche stated that
its 2012 modified antitheft system will
now consist of a microprocessor based
immobilizer system which prevents
functioning of the engine management
system, an activated parking brake
system, central locking and an alarm
system.
Porsche also stated that with its 2012
modification, the normal state of the
applicable control unit is to not allow
engine starting or release of the
activated parking brake. Only by
insertion of the correct key into the
ignition switch, or by having the special
keyless entry keyfob/device with the
occupant compartment of the car is the
correct signal sent to the applicable
control units, allowing the engine to
start and activation of the parking brake
to be released. Porsche stated that when
the key is removed from the ignition, or
the ignition switch/control unit is
turned to the ignition lock position and
the keyfob exits the vehicle with the
driver, the device will return to its
normal ‘‘off’’ state, preventing the engine
from starting and the parking brake from
being released.
Porsche stated that it believes that the
planned deletion of the electronic
steering column lock from its
comprehensive device for the Panamera
vehicle line will continue to be as
effective as parts-marking and should
continue to qualify for an exemption
from parts-marking. Since the same
aspects of performance (i.e., arming of
the device and the immobilization
feature) are still provided, the agency
believes that the same level of
protection is being met. The agency
agrees that the deletion of the electronic
steering column lock feature should
have no effect on functionality of the
device’s ability to deter theft. Since the
agency granted Porsche’s exemption for
its MY 2010 Panamera vehicle line,
there has been no available theft rate
data published by the agency for the
vehicle line.
The agency has evaluated Porsche’s
MY 2012 petition to modify the
exemption for the Panamera vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of
49 CFR part 541, and has decided to
grant it. The agency believes that the
proposed device will continue to
provide the five types of performance
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22175
listed in § 543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; attracting attention to the
efforts of unauthorized persons to enter
or operate a vehicle by means other than
a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
If Porsche decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it should
formally notify the agency. If such a
decision is made, the line must be fully
marked according to the requirements
under 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking
of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: April 22, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010–9704 Filed 4–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial
of 95 applications from individuals who
requested an exemption from the
Federal vision standard applicable to
interstate truck and bus drivers and the
reasons for the denials. FMCSA has
statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions does not provide a level of
safety that will be equivalent to, or
greater than, the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for
these commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director Medical
Programs, 202–366–4001, U.S.
Department of Transportation, FMCSA,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room
W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22174-22175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9704]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition To Modify an Exemption of a Previously Approved
Antitheft Device; Porsche
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of a petition to modify an exemption of a previously
approved antitheft device.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 20, 2009, the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) granted in full Porsche Cars North America's
(Porsche) petition for an exemption in accordance with Sec.
543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard for the Porsche Panamera vehicle line beginning with model
year (MY 2010). On February 4, 2010, Porsche submitted a petition to
modify its previously approved exemption for the Porsche Panamera
vehicle line beginning with model year (MY) 2012. NHTSA is granting
Porsche's petition to modify the exemption in full because it has
determined that the modified device is also likely to be as effective
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
model year (MY) 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Standards, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 20, 2009, NHTSA published in the
Federal Register a notice granting in full a petition from Porsche for
an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541) for the Panamera vehicle line
beginning with its MY 2010 vehicles. The Porsche Panamera is equipped
with a passive antitheft device (see 74 FR 10837) and an audible and
visible alarm.
On February 4, 2010, Porsche submitted a petition to modify the
previously approved exemption for the Panamera vehicle line. This
notice grants in full Porsche's petition to modify the exemption for
the Panamera vehicle line. Porsche's submission is a complete petition,
as required by 49
[[Page 22175]]
CFR 543.9(d), in that it meets the general requirements contained in 49
CFR 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 49 CFR 543.6.
Porsche's petition provides a detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the components of the antitheft
device proposed for installation beginning with the 2012 model year.
The MY 2010 passive antitheft device installed on the Porsche
Panamera includes a microprocessor-based immobilizer system, electronic
ignition switch, transponder key, remote control unit, alarm/central
locking control unit, optional keyless entry system and electronic
parking brake. Porsche stated that the central locking system works in
conjunction with the audible and visible alarm. Locking the doors with
the ignition key, the remote control or a door switch (with the keyless
entry option) will activate the audible and visible alarm. An
ultrasonic sensor in the alarm system will monitor the doors, rear
luggage compartment, front deck lid, fuel filler door, and interior
movement. The horn will sound and the lights will flash if there is any
detection of unauthorized use. Porsche stated that its immobilizer
prevents the engine management system and steering system from
functioning when the system is engaged. The immobilizer is
automatically activated when the key is removed from the ignition
switch assembly, or the optional special keyless entry keycard exits
the vehicle with the driver. The immobilizer then returns to its normal
``off'' state, where engine starting, operation, and steering are
inhibited. Starting the engine and operation of the vehicle will be
allowed only when the correct code is sent to the control unit by using
the correct key in the ignition switch, or by having the correct
keyless entry keycard within the occupant compartment of the car. The
ignition key contains a radio signal transponder which signals the
control unit to allow steering and the engine to start. With the
keyless entry system, operation of the vehicle is allowed when the
ignition key is substituted with the special keycard that contains a
radio signal transmitter similar to the transponder in the standard
ignition key.
Porsche also stated that the Panamera line is equipped with an
electronic steering column lock and an electronically activated parking
brake which is integrated into the vehicle's antitheft device. If the
control unit does not receive the correct code from the ignition key or
keycard, the parking brake will remain activated and the vehicle cannot
be towed.
In its 2012 modification, Porsche stated that it proposes to delete
the electronic steering column lock equipped on the exempted vehicle
line because the steering column lock is considered redundant by the
electronic parking brake that is standard equipment on the line.
Porsche proposes to delete the electronic steering lock feature
beginning with its MY 2012 vehicles. Porsche stated that its 2012
modified antitheft system will now consist of a microprocessor based
immobilizer system which prevents functioning of the engine management
system, an activated parking brake system, central locking and an alarm
system.
Porsche also stated that with its 2012 modification, the normal
state of the applicable control unit is to not allow engine starting or
release of the activated parking brake. Only by insertion of the
correct key into the ignition switch, or by having the special keyless
entry keyfob/device with the occupant compartment of the car is the
correct signal sent to the applicable control units, allowing the
engine to start and activation of the parking brake to be released.
Porsche stated that when the key is removed from the ignition, or the
ignition switch/control unit is turned to the ignition lock position
and the keyfob exits the vehicle with the driver, the device will
return to its normal ``off'' state, preventing the engine from starting
and the parking brake from being released.
Porsche stated that it believes that the planned deletion of the
electronic steering column lock from its comprehensive device for the
Panamera vehicle line will continue to be as effective as parts-marking
and should continue to qualify for an exemption from parts-marking.
Since the same aspects of performance (i.e., arming of the device and
the immobilization feature) are still provided, the agency believes
that the same level of protection is being met. The agency agrees that
the deletion of the electronic steering column lock feature should have
no effect on functionality of the device's ability to deter theft.
Since the agency granted Porsche's exemption for its MY 2010 Panamera
vehicle line, there has been no available theft rate data published by
the agency for the vehicle line.
The agency has evaluated Porsche's MY 2012 petition to modify the
exemption for the Panamera vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541, and has decided to grant it. The
agency believes that the proposed device will continue to provide the
five types of performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting
activation; attracting attention to the efforts of unauthorized persons
to enter or operate a vehicle by means other than a key; preventing
defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized persons;
preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and
ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.
If Porsche decides not to use the exemption for this line, it
should formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line
must be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer contemplates making any
changes, the effects of which might be characterized as de minimis, it
should consult the agency before preparing and submitting a petition to
modify.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR
1.50.
Issued on: April 22, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-9704 Filed 4-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P