Criteria and Procedures for Proposed Assessment of Civil Penalties/Reporting and Recordkeeping: Immediate Notification of Accidents, 21990 [2010-9675]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
21990
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 27, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
motion and proposed order information
required by this rule and the
Commission’s instructions posted on
the Commission’s Web site, the
Commission will not accept for filing
the motion and proposed order. Rather,
the Commission will inform the filing
party of the need for correction and
resubmission.
(c) Final order. Any order by the
Judge approving a settlement shall set
forth the reasons for approval and shall
be supported by the record. Such order
shall become the final order of the
Commission 40 days after issuance
unless the Commission has directed that
the order be reviewed. A Judge may
correct clerical errors in an order
approving settlement in accordance
with the provisions of 29 CFR
2700.69(c).
Dated: April 21, 2010.
Mary Lu Jordan,
Chairman, Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
Agency intends that the phrase, ‘‘Any
other accident,’’ as used in paragraph (d)
of MSHA’s standard at § 50.10 refers to:
• An entrapment of an individual for
more than 30 minutes; and
• Any other accident as defined in
§ 50.2(h)(4)–(12).
After reviewing the comments, MSHA
determined that they were not
‘‘significant adverse comments.’’
Therefore, the Agency did not withdraw
the direct final rule.
The comments can be viewed on
MSHA’s Web site at
https://www.msha.gov/REGS/Comments/
E9-30608/immediatenotify.asp.
Dated: April 21, 2010.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010–9675 Filed 4–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[FR Doc. 2010–9689 Filed 4–26–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735–01–P
Regulatory Information
Coast Guard
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
33 CFR Part 165
Mine Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0271]
RIN 1625–AA00
30 CFR Parts 50 and 100
RIN 1219–AB63
Criteria and Procedures for Proposed
Assessment of Civil Penalties/
Reporting and Recordkeeping:
Immediate Notification of Accidents
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
SUMMARY: MSHA published a direct
final rule for parts 50 and 100 on
December 29, 2009. MSHA stated that
the Agency would withdraw the direct
final rule if the Agency received
significant adverse comments. Because
the Agency did not receive any
significant adverse comment, the direct
final rule became effective. This notice
confirms the effective date.
DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
MSHA, at silvey.patricia@dol.gov (email), 202–693–9440 (voice), or 202–
693–9441 (facsimile).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MSHA
received comments on the direct final
rule indicating that some members of
the mining industry misunderstood the
Agency’s intent. For clarification, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Apr 26, 2010
Jkt 220001
Safety Zone; Extended Debris Removal
in the Lake Champlain Bridge
Construction Zone (Between Vermont
and New York), Crown Point, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters immediately
surrounding the Lake Champlain Bridge
construction zone between Chimney
Point, VT and Crown Point, NY. This
rule re-establishes a safety zone that was
scheduled to expire prior to the
completion of the removal of debris
from the old Crown Point bridge
demolition. The debris must be cleared
from the navigable waterway prior to
opening the channel to vessel traffic.
This rule is necessary to provide safety
of life on the navigable waters within
this area during the demolition and
debris removal of the bridge piers
within this construction zone.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on April 27, 2010. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from 12:01 a.m. on Friday,
April 16, 2010 through 11:59 p.m. on
Saturday, May 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0271 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0271 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Junior
Grade Laura van der Pol, Coast Guard
Sector Northern New England,
Waterways Management Division;
telephone 207–741–5421, e-mail
Laura.K.vanderPol1@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. The New York
State Department of Transportation
recently requested an extension to
deadline for removing the concrete piers
(6 and 7) which line the main channel
in Crown Point, NY. These piers can
only be effectively removed by
explosive charges, and both the piers
and subsequent debris must be removed
before the Coast Guard can reopen the
channel to all vessel traffic. The Coast
Guard did not receive notification of
delays in the debris removal operations
in sufficient time to complete a
comment period prior to the expiration
of the existing safety zone. As delaying
the demolition and debris removal
process is contrary to public interest,
and there is continued need to protect
waterway users from hazardous debris
in the navigational channel, a comment
period is both impractical and
unnecessary.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM
27APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9675]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 50 and 100
RIN 1219-AB63
Criteria and Procedures for Proposed Assessment of Civil
Penalties/Reporting and Recordkeeping: Immediate Notification of
Accidents
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: MSHA published a direct final rule for parts 50 and 100 on
December 29, 2009. MSHA stated that the Agency would withdraw the
direct final rule if the Agency received significant adverse comments.
Because the Agency did not receive any significant adverse comment, the
direct final rule became effective. This notice confirms the effective
date.
DATES: Effective Date: March 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at
silvey.patricia@dol.gov (e-mail), 202-693-9440 (voice), or 202-693-9441
(facsimile).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MSHA received comments on the direct final
rule indicating that some members of the mining industry misunderstood
the Agency's intent. For clarification, the Agency intends that the
phrase, ``Any other accident,'' as used in paragraph (d) of MSHA's
standard at Sec. 50.10 refers to:
An entrapment of an individual for more than 30 minutes;
and
Any other accident as defined in Sec. 50.2(h)(4)-(12).
After reviewing the comments, MSHA determined that they were not
``significant adverse comments.'' Therefore, the Agency did not
withdraw the direct final rule.
The comments can be viewed on MSHA's Web site at https://www.msha.gov/REGS/Comments/E9-30608/immediatenotify.asp.
Dated: April 21, 2010.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-9675 Filed 4-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-43-P
