Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Circumvention Inquiry, 21241-21243 [2010-9488]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
limited to localized and temporary
displacement (Level B harassment). The
taking by harassment is not expected to
result in an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of such species for
taking for subsistence uses.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
For the reasons already described in
this Federal Register notice, NMFS has
determined that the described proposed
construction activities and the
accompanying IHA are not anticipated
to have the potential to adversely affect
species under NMFS jurisdiction and
protected by the ESA. Consequently,
NMFS has determined that a Section 7
consultation is not required. The
northern fur seal, which is the only
species of marine mammal under NMFS
jurisdiction likely to occur in the action
area, is not listed under the ESA.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS has prepared an Environmental
Assessment for Issuance of an Incidental
Harassment Authorization for
Replacement and Repair of Northern
Fur Seal Observation Towers and
Walkways on St. Paul Island, Alaska
(EA), which analyzes the direct, indirect
and cumulative environmental impacts
of the proposed specified activities on
marine mammals including those listed
as threatened or endangered under the
ESA. Based on the analysis contained in
the EA, NMFS has issued a Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
issuance of the IHA.
Determinations
Based on NMFS AKR’s application, as
well as the analysis contained herein,
NMFS has determined that the impact
of the described replacement and repair
operations will result, at most, in a
temporary modification in behavior by
small numbers of northern fur seals. The
effect of the construction activities is
expected to be limited to short-term and
localized behavioral changes.
Due to the infrequency, short timeframe, and localized nature of these
activities, the number of marine
mammals, relative to the population
size, potentially taken by harassment is
expected to be small. In addition, no
take by injury (Level A harassment),
serious injury, and/or death is
anticipated or authorized, and take by
Level B harassment will be at the lowest
level practicable due to incorporation of
the monitoring and mitigation measures
mentioned previously in this document.
NMFS has further determined that the
anticipated takes will have a negligible
impact on the affected species or stock
of marine mammals. Also, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
construction project is not expected to
result in an unmitigable adverse impact
on subsistence uses of this species.
Authorization
As a result of these determinations,
NMFS issued an IHA to NMFS AKR for
the harassment of small numbers (based
on populations of the species and stock)
of northern fur seals incidental to
construction operations on St. Paul
Island, including the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements.
Dated: April 16, 2010.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–9513 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–849]
Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate from the People’s Republic of
China: Initiation of Antidumping
Circumvention Inquiry
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Effective Date: April 23, 2010.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.; Nucor
Corporation; SSAB N.A.D., Evraz
Claymont Steel and Evraz Oregon Steel
Mills (collectively ‘‘Domestic
Producers’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is initiating
an antidumping circumvention inquiry,
pursuant to section 781(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), to
determine whether certain imports of
certain cut–to-length carbon steel plate
(‘‘CTL plate’’) are circumventing the
antidumping duty order on CTL plate
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). See Suspension Agreement on
Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate From the People’s Republic of
China; Termination of Suspension
Agreement and Notice of Antidumping
Duty Order, 68 FR 60081 (October 21,
2003) (‘‘Order’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Pandolph or Howard Smith,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–3627 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21241
Background
On February 17, 2010, Domestic
Producers requested that the
Department make a final circumvention
ruling within 45 days pursuant to 19
CFR 351.225(c)(2) and (d) with respect
to CTL plate produced by Wuyang Iron
and Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuyang’’),
regardless of the exporter or importer, or
imported by Stemcor USA Inc.
(‘‘Stemcor’’), regardless of the producer
or exporter, which contain 0.0008
percent or more, by weight, of boron.
Domestic Producers maintain that
such plates are circumventing the Order
on CTL plate from the PRC because of
minor alterations thereto. See 781(c) of
the Act; see also Letter from Domestic
Producers regarding, ‘‘Certain Cut–toLength Carbon Steel Plate From the
People’s Republic of China: Request for
Circumvention Ruling,’’ dated February
17, 2010 (‘‘Domestic Producers’
Request’’). As evidence, Domestic
Producers submitted a mill test
certificate from Wuyang for ASTM A830
steel plate and a letter from a non–
petitioning U.S. steel producer, stating
that Stemcor was importing steel plate
from PRC producers containing small
amounts of boron resulting in the
classification of the plate as ‘‘alloy’’ steel
plate and, thus, circumventing the
Order. See id. at 7–8 and Exhibits 1 and
2.
Domestic Producers note that the
Department has made a previous ruling
that CTL plate produced by Tianjin Iron
and Steel Co., Ltd. and/or imported by
Toyota Tsusho America with small
amounts of boron added, but otherwise
fitting the description of subject CTL
plate, are circumventing the Order on
CTL plate from the PRC. See id. at 9; see
also, Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon
Steel Plate From the People’s Republic
of China, 74 FR 40565 (August 12,
2009). Moreover, Domestic Producers
argue that there is an incentive for PRC
producers to add insignificant amounts
of boron to their steel products for the
purpose of securing a higher export
rebate, which further confirms the
evidence that circumvention is
occurring. See Domestic Producers’
Request at 8 and Exhibit 4; see also,
Letter from Domestic Producers,
regarding ‘‘Certain Cut–to-Length
Carbon Steel Plate From the People’s
Republic of China: Clarification of
Request for Circumvention Ruling,’’
dated March 23, 2010 (‘‘Domestic
Producers’ Response’’) at 8–9 and
Exhibit 4. Furthermore, Domestic
Producers note that Wuyang’s
production and export of CTL plate with
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
21242
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
boron follows the imposition of the
Order on CTL plate from the PRC and
occurs as the PRC government changed
its own tariff system to favor exporters’
shift from exporting non–alloy steel
products to alloy steel products. See
Domestic Producers’ Request at 18.
On March 10, 2010, the Department
identified various issues in the
Domestic Producers’ Request that
required clarification. On March 18, and
March 23, 2010, Domestic Producers
submitted their responses. In their
responses, Domestic Producers clarified
that the ASTM A830 specification is not
for alloy steels, but for carbon and
manganese carbon steels. See Domestic
Producers’ Response at 4. Domestic
Producers further assert that the
submitted mill test certificate presented
none of the characteristics that would be
expected for steel to which boron has
been added for hardenability. See id. at
5–7 and Exhibits 1 and 3.
On March 23, and March 26, 2010,
Stemcor submitted comments on
Domestic Producers’ Request and
responses to the Department’s March 10,
2010, request for clarification. In its
March 23, 2010, comments, Stemcor
asserts that, contrary to Domestic
Producers’ allegation, it is not involved
in circumventing the Order on CTL
plate from the PRC. See letter from
Stemcor regarding, ‘‘Certain Cut–toLength Steel Plate from the People’s
Republic of China: Initial Comments on
Request for Circumvention Ruling,
dated March 23, 2010 at 2. Moreover,
Stemcor claims that the facts of this case
are distinct from the previous
circumvention ruling. See id. at 3.
Specifically, Stemcor notes that boron is
not mentioned in the ASTM A36
specification, the specification of CTL
plate which was examined in the
previous circumvention ruling, whereas
the CTL plate it imports is made to the
ASTM A830 specification, which
explicitly mentions boron. See id. at 3–
4. In its March 26, 2010, comments,
Stemcor asserts that boron is included
in the ASTM A830 plate that it imports
because boron imparts certain desirable
physical properties, which enhances the
wearability of the steel. See letter from
Stemcor regarding, ‘‘Certain Cut–toLength Steel Plate from the People’s
Republic of China: Further Comments
on Request for Circumvention Ruling,
dated March 26, 2010 at 2–3. Stemcor
further asserts that the ASTM A830
plate meets its customers’ requirements
with regard to wear characteristics of
steel. See id. at 7–8. Moreover, Stemcor
asserts that the ASTM A830 steel plate
is used for making metal molds for the
automotive industry, and not for
structural steel as Domestic Producers
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
allege. See id. at 9–10. Stemcor also
notes that the Domestic Producers’
allegation concerning the role of the
PRC government’s rebate program for
exports of alloy steel is wrong because
the timing of the rebate program does
not match the timing of Stemcor’s
imports of alloy steel plates. See id. at
12. The Department intends to explore
the issues raised in Stemcor’s comments
after initiation.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order
include hot–rolled iron and non–alloy
steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat–
rolled products rolled on four faces or
in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding
1250 mm and of a thickness of not less
than 4 mm, not in coils and without
patterns in relief), of rectangular shape,
neither clad, plated nor coated with
metal, whether or not painted,
varnished, or coated with plastics or
other nonmetallic substances; and
certain iron and non–alloy steel flat–
rolled products not in coils, of
rectangular shape, hot–rolled, neither
clad, nor coated with metal, whether or
not painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other nonmetallic substances,
4.75 mm or more in thickness and of a
width which exceeds 150 mm and
measures at least twice the thickness.
Included as subject merchandise in the
order are flat–rolled products of
nonrectangular cross-section where
such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process (i.e.,
products which have been ‘‘worked after
rolling’’) - for example, products which
have been beveled or rounded at the
edges. This merchandise is currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’)
under item numbers 7208.40.3030,
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030,
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060,
7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000,
7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000,
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000,
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000. Although
the HTS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive. Specifically
excluded from subject merchandise
within the scope of the order is grade X–
70 steel plate.
Merchandise Subject to the Minor
Alterations Antidumping
Circumvention Inquiry
The merchandise subject to this
antidumping circumvention inquiry
consists of CTL plate from the PRC
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
produced by Wuyang containing 0.0008
percent or more boron, by weight, and
otherwise meeting the requirements of
the scope of the Order as listed under
the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’ section above,
with the exception of merchandise
meeting all of the following
requirements: (1) aluminum level of
0.02 percent or greater, by weight; (2) a
ratio of 3.4 to 1 or greater, by weight, of
titanium to nitrogen; and (3) a
hardenability test (i.e., Jominy test)
result indicating a boron factor of 1.8 or
greater. The Department also intends to
address whether its circumvention
ruling will apply to particular
producers, exporters, and/or importers
(e.g., Stemcor) or to U.S. imports of all
CTL plate from the PRC.
Initiation of Minor Alterations
Antidumping Circumvention
Proceeding
Section 781(c)(1) of the Act provides
that the Department may find
circumvention of an antidumping duty
order when products which are of the
class or kind of merchandise subject to
an antidumping duty order have been
‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor
respects . . . whether or not included in
the same tariff classification.’’ The
Department notes that, while the statute
is silent as to what factors to consider
in determining whether alterations are
properly considered ‘‘minor,’’ the
legislative history of this provision
indicates there are certain factors which
should be considered before reaching a
circumvention determination. In
conducting a circumvention inquiry
under section 781(c) of the Act, the
Department has generally relied upon
‘‘such criteria as the overall physical
characteristics of the merchandise, the
expectations of the ultimate users, the
use of the merchandise, the channels of
marketing and the cost of any
modification relative to the total value
of the imported products.’’ See S. Rep.
No.71, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 100 (1987)
(‘‘In applying this provision, the
Commerce Department should apply
practical measurements regarding minor
alterations, so that circumvention can be
dealt with effectively, even where such
alterations to an article technically
transform it into a differently designated
article.’’)
Overall Physical Characteristics
Domestic Producers maintain that
CTL plate with the addition of boron is
produced in the same manner and to the
same specifications as subject CTL
plate. See Domestic Producers’ Request
at 13. Domestic Producers note that
while boron can improve steel’s
hardenability, there are certain other
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
parameters that must be met. See id. at
13–14. Specifically, Domestic Producers
maintain that if CTL plate is to be used
as an alloy steel plate (i.e., boron steel
plate), then an aluminum level of 0.02
percent or greater, by weight; a ratio of
3.4 to 1 or greater, by weight, of
titanium to nitrogen; and a
hardenability test (i.e., Jominy test)
result indicating a boron factor of 1.8 or
greater must be present. See id.
Expectations of the Ultimate Users
Domestic Producers indicate that they
are unaware of any instances where
customers expect or request CTL plate
with small amounts of boron added,
other than to potentially avoid the
added expense to the plate products that
result from the antidumping duties in
place. See id. at 15. Domestic Producers
argue that without the proper amounts
of aluminum and titanium and
sufficient hardenability, there would be
no reason to request the addition of
boron nor would there be a basis for
concluding that the presence of small
amounts of boron added any special
properties to CTL plate. See id.
Use of the Merchandise
Domestic Producers state the product
at issue is used for the same purposes
as subject merchandise. See id. at 16.
Moreover, Domestic Producers assert
that CTL plate with small amounts of
boron is not suitable for different or
additional uses compared to subject
CTL plate without boron. See id.
Domestic Producers conclude, therefore,
that Wuyang’s customers would have no
basis for concluding that the presence of
small amounts of boron imparts any
special properties to the CTL plate
beyond those already present in ASTM
A830 plate without boron. See id.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Channels of Marketing
Domestic Producers state the channels
of marketing for the boron–added CTL
plate and the subject CTL plate are the
same, noting that both products are
marketed in the same manner, appeal to
the same end users, and are used for the
same end uses. See id.
Cost of Modification
Domestic Producers indicate that the
addition of boron at levels recognized as
alloy amounts by the tariff schedule
involve minimal additional cost. In
addition, Domestic Producers cite the
Department’s finding in a previous
ruling that reaching the 0.0008 percent
threshold for boron involved a cost
amounting to considerably less than
one–third of one percent of the sales
price. See Domestic Producers’ Request
at 16–17.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
Based on the information provided by
Domestic Producers, the Department
finds there is sufficient basis to initiate
an antidumping circumvention inquiry,
pursuant to section 781(c) of the Act, to
determine whether the merchandise
subject to the inquiry (identified in the
‘‘Merchandise Subject to the Minor
Alterations Antidumping
Circumvention Inquiry’’ section above)
involves a minor alteration to subject
merchandise that is so insignificant as
to render the resulting merchandise
(classified as ‘‘alloy’’ steel under the
HTS) subject to the Order on CTL plate
from the PRC. As noted above, in
making this determination the
Department also intends to address
whether its circumvention ruling
applies to particular producers,
exporters, and/or importers or to all U.S.
imports of CTL plate from the PRC.
Although Domestic Producers requested
that the Department make a final ruling
within 45 days, additional time is
needed for further inquiry into Domestic
Producers’ allegations and Stemcor’s
comments.
The Department will not order the
suspension of liquidation of entries of
any additional merchandise at this time.
However, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.225(l)(2), if the Department issues a
preliminary affirmative determination,
we will then instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to suspend
liquidation and require a cash deposit of
estimated duties, at the applicable rate,
for each unliquidated entry of the
merchandise at issue, entered or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption on or after the date of
initiation of the inquiry.
We intend to notify the International
Trade Commission in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination of
circumvention, in accordance with
781(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.225(f)(7)(i)(C). The Department will,
following consultation with interested
parties, establish a schedule for
questionnaires and comments on the
issues. The Department intends to issue
its final determination within 300 days
of the date of publication of this
initiation notice.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 781(c) and (d)
of the Act and 19
CFR 351.225(i).
Dated: April 16, 2010.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010–9488 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21243
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XS60
Marine Mammals; Subsistence Taking
of Northern Fur Seals; St. George
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt
of a petition for rulemaking under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The Pribilof Island Community of St.
George Island, Traditional Council
(Council) petitioned NMFS to revise
regulations governing the subsistence
taking of northern fur seals to allow
residents of St. George Island to take
male fur seal young of the year during
the fall. NMFS solicits public comments
on this request.
DATES: Written comments must be
received at the appropriate address or
fax number by June 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Information related to the
request for rulemaking is available on
the Internet at the following address:
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/
protectedresources/seals/fur.htm.
Send comments to Kaja Brix,
Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division, Alaska
Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian.
Comments may be submitted by:
• Email: furseal@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following document
identifier: Northern Fur Seal St. George.
Email comments with or without
attachments are limited to 5 megabytes;
• Mail: Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Protected Resources
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802;
• Hand Delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK; or
• Fax: 907 586 7557.
All comments received are a part of
the public record. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name,
address) voluntarily submitted by the
commenter may be publicly accessible.
Do not submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Williams, (907) 271–5006,
email Michael.Williams@noaa.gov; Kaja
Brix, (907) 586–7235, email
Kaja.Brix@noaa.gov; or Tom Eagle, (301)
713–2322, ext. 105, email
Tom.Eagle@noaa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21241-21243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9488]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-849]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's
Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Circumvention Inquiry
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Effective Date:
April 23, 2010.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.; Nucor
Corporation; SSAB N.A.D., Evraz Claymont Steel and Evraz Oregon Steel
Mills (collectively ``Domestic Producers''), the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') is initiating an antidumping circumvention inquiry,
pursuant to section 781(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
``Act''), to determine whether certain imports of certain cut-to-length
carbon steel plate (``CTL plate'') are circumventing the antidumping
duty order on CTL plate from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').
See Suspension Agreement on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
From the People's Republic of China; Termination of Suspension
Agreement and Notice of Antidumping Duty Order, 68 FR 60081 (October
21, 2003) (``Order'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Pandolph or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
3627 or (202) 482-5193, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 17, 2010, Domestic Producers requested that the
Department make a final circumvention ruling within 45 days pursuant to
19 CFR 351.225(c)(2) and (d) with respect to CTL plate produced by
Wuyang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (``Wuyang''), regardless of the
exporter or importer, or imported by Stemcor USA Inc. (``Stemcor''),
regardless of the producer or exporter, which contain 0.0008 percent or
more, by weight, of boron.
Domestic Producers maintain that such plates are circumventing the
Order on CTL plate from the PRC because of minor alterations thereto.
See 781(c) of the Act; see also Letter from Domestic Producers
regarding, ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's
Republic of China: Request for Circumvention Ruling,'' dated February
17, 2010 (``Domestic Producers' Request''). As evidence, Domestic
Producers submitted a mill test certificate from Wuyang for ASTM A830
steel plate and a letter from a non-petitioning U.S. steel producer,
stating that Stemcor was importing steel plate from PRC producers
containing small amounts of boron resulting in the classification of
the plate as ``alloy'' steel plate and, thus, circumventing the Order.
See id. at 7-8 and Exhibits 1 and 2.
Domestic Producers note that the Department has made a previous
ruling that CTL plate produced by Tianjin Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. and/
or imported by Toyota Tsusho America with small amounts of boron added,
but otherwise fitting the description of subject CTL plate, are
circumventing the Order on CTL plate from the PRC. See id. at 9; see
also, Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From
the People's Republic of China, 74 FR 40565 (August 12, 2009).
Moreover, Domestic Producers argue that there is an incentive for PRC
producers to add insignificant amounts of boron to their steel products
for the purpose of securing a higher export rebate, which further
confirms the evidence that circumvention is occurring. See Domestic
Producers' Request at 8 and Exhibit 4; see also, Letter from Domestic
Producers, regarding ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From
the People's Republic of China: Clarification of Request for
Circumvention Ruling,'' dated March 23, 2010 (``Domestic Producers'
Response'') at 8-9 and Exhibit 4. Furthermore, Domestic Producers note
that Wuyang's production and export of CTL plate with
[[Page 21242]]
boron follows the imposition of the Order on CTL plate from the PRC and
occurs as the PRC government changed its own tariff system to favor
exporters' shift from exporting non-alloy steel products to alloy steel
products. See Domestic Producers' Request at 18.
On March 10, 2010, the Department identified various issues in the
Domestic Producers' Request that required clarification. On March 18,
and March 23, 2010, Domestic Producers submitted their responses. In
their responses, Domestic Producers clarified that the ASTM A830
specification is not for alloy steels, but for carbon and manganese
carbon steels. See Domestic Producers' Response at 4. Domestic
Producers further assert that the submitted mill test certificate
presented none of the characteristics that would be expected for steel
to which boron has been added for hardenability. See id. at 5-7 and
Exhibits 1 and 3.
On March 23, and March 26, 2010, Stemcor submitted comments on
Domestic Producers' Request and responses to the Department's March 10,
2010, request for clarification. In its March 23, 2010, comments,
Stemcor asserts that, contrary to Domestic Producers' allegation, it is
not involved in circumventing the Order on CTL plate from the PRC. See
letter from Stemcor regarding, ``Certain Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from
the People's Republic of China: Initial Comments on Request for
Circumvention Ruling, dated March 23, 2010 at 2. Moreover, Stemcor
claims that the facts of this case are distinct from the previous
circumvention ruling. See id. at 3. Specifically, Stemcor notes that
boron is not mentioned in the ASTM A36 specification, the specification
of CTL plate which was examined in the previous circumvention ruling,
whereas the CTL plate it imports is made to the ASTM A830
specification, which explicitly mentions boron. See id. at 3-4. In its
March 26, 2010, comments, Stemcor asserts that boron is included in the
ASTM A830 plate that it imports because boron imparts certain desirable
physical properties, which enhances the wearability of the steel. See
letter from Stemcor regarding, ``Certain Cut-to-Length Steel Plate from
the People's Republic of China: Further Comments on Request for
Circumvention Ruling, dated March 26, 2010 at 2-3. Stemcor further
asserts that the ASTM A830 plate meets its customers' requirements with
regard to wear characteristics of steel. See id. at 7-8. Moreover,
Stemcor asserts that the ASTM A830 steel plate is used for making metal
molds for the automotive industry, and not for structural steel as
Domestic Producers allege. See id. at 9-10. Stemcor also notes that the
Domestic Producers' allegation concerning the role of the PRC
government's rebate program for exports of alloy steel is wrong because
the timing of the rebate program does not match the timing of Stemcor's
imports of alloy steel plates. See id. at 12. The Department intends to
explore the issues raised in Stemcor's comments after initiation.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order include hot-rolled iron and non-
alloy steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on
four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not
exceeding 1250 mm and of a thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in
coils and without patterns in relief), of rectangular shape, neither
clad, plated nor coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished,
or coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances; and certain
iron and non-alloy steel flat-rolled products not in coils, of
rectangular shape, hot-rolled, neither clad, nor coated with metal,
whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other
nonmetallic substances, 4.75 mm or more in thickness and of a width
which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness.
Included as subject merchandise in the order are flat-rolled products
of nonrectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process (i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'') - for example, products which have been
beveled or rounded at the edges. This merchandise is currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTS'') under item numbers 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030,
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000. Although the
HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Specifically excluded from subject merchandise within the scope of the
order is grade X-70 steel plate.
Merchandise Subject to the Minor Alterations Antidumping Circumvention
Inquiry
The merchandise subject to this antidumping circumvention inquiry
consists of CTL plate from the PRC produced by Wuyang containing 0.0008
percent or more boron, by weight, and otherwise meeting the
requirements of the scope of the Order as listed under the ``Scope of
the Order'' section above, with the exception of merchandise meeting
all of the following requirements: (1) aluminum level of 0.02 percent
or greater, by weight; (2) a ratio of 3.4 to 1 or greater, by weight,
of titanium to nitrogen; and (3) a hardenability test (i.e., Jominy
test) result indicating a boron factor of 1.8 or greater. The
Department also intends to address whether its circumvention ruling
will apply to particular producers, exporters, and/or importers (e.g.,
Stemcor) or to U.S. imports of all CTL plate from the PRC.
Initiation of Minor Alterations Antidumping Circumvention Proceeding
Section 781(c)(1) of the Act provides that the Department may find
circumvention of an antidumping duty order when products which are of
the class or kind of merchandise subject to an antidumping duty order
have been ``altered in form or appearance in minor respects . . .
whether or not included in the same tariff classification.'' The
Department notes that, while the statute is silent as to what factors
to consider in determining whether alterations are properly considered
``minor,'' the legislative history of this provision indicates there
are certain factors which should be considered before reaching a
circumvention determination. In conducting a circumvention inquiry
under section 781(c) of the Act, the Department has generally relied
upon ``such criteria as the overall physical characteristics of the
merchandise, the expectations of the ultimate users, the use of the
merchandise, the channels of marketing and the cost of any modification
relative to the total value of the imported products.'' See S. Rep.
No.71, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 100 (1987) (``In applying this provision,
the Commerce Department should apply practical measurements regarding
minor alterations, so that circumvention can be dealt with effectively,
even where such alterations to an article technically transform it into
a differently designated article.'')
Overall Physical Characteristics
Domestic Producers maintain that CTL plate with the addition of
boron is produced in the same manner and to the same specifications as
subject CTL plate. See Domestic Producers' Request at 13. Domestic
Producers note that while boron can improve steel's hardenability,
there are certain other
[[Page 21243]]
parameters that must be met. See id. at 13-14. Specifically, Domestic
Producers maintain that if CTL plate is to be used as an alloy steel
plate (i.e., boron steel plate), then an aluminum level of 0.02 percent
or greater, by weight; a ratio of 3.4 to 1 or greater, by weight, of
titanium to nitrogen; and a hardenability test (i.e., Jominy test)
result indicating a boron factor of 1.8 or greater must be present. See
id.
Expectations of the Ultimate Users
Domestic Producers indicate that they are unaware of any instances
where customers expect or request CTL plate with small amounts of boron
added, other than to potentially avoid the added expense to the plate
products that result from the antidumping duties in place. See id. at
15. Domestic Producers argue that without the proper amounts of
aluminum and titanium and sufficient hardenability, there would be no
reason to request the addition of boron nor would there be a basis for
concluding that the presence of small amounts of boron added any
special properties to CTL plate. See id.
Use of the Merchandise
Domestic Producers state the product at issue is used for the same
purposes as subject merchandise. See id. at 16. Moreover, Domestic
Producers assert that CTL plate with small amounts of boron is not
suitable for different or additional uses compared to subject CTL plate
without boron. See id. Domestic Producers conclude, therefore, that
Wuyang's customers would have no basis for concluding that the presence
of small amounts of boron imparts any special properties to the CTL
plate beyond those already present in ASTM A830 plate without boron.
See id.
Channels of Marketing
Domestic Producers state the channels of marketing for the boron-
added CTL plate and the subject CTL plate are the same, noting that
both products are marketed in the same manner, appeal to the same end
users, and are used for the same end uses. See id.
Cost of Modification
Domestic Producers indicate that the addition of boron at levels
recognized as alloy amounts by the tariff schedule involve minimal
additional cost. In addition, Domestic Producers cite the Department's
finding in a previous ruling that reaching the 0.0008 percent threshold
for boron involved a cost amounting to considerably less than one-third
of one percent of the sales price. See Domestic Producers' Request at
16-17.
Based on the information provided by Domestic Producers, the
Department finds there is sufficient basis to initiate an antidumping
circumvention inquiry, pursuant to section 781(c) of the Act, to
determine whether the merchandise subject to the inquiry (identified in
the ``Merchandise Subject to the Minor Alterations Antidumping
Circumvention Inquiry'' section above) involves a minor alteration to
subject merchandise that is so insignificant as to render the resulting
merchandise (classified as ``alloy'' steel under the HTS) subject to
the Order on CTL plate from the PRC. As noted above, in making this
determination the Department also intends to address whether its
circumvention ruling applies to particular producers, exporters, and/or
importers or to all U.S. imports of CTL plate from the PRC. Although
Domestic Producers requested that the Department make a final ruling
within 45 days, additional time is needed for further inquiry into
Domestic Producers' allegations and Stemcor's comments.
The Department will not order the suspension of liquidation of
entries of any additional merchandise at this time. However, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.225(l)(2), if the Department issues a
preliminary affirmative determination, we will then instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation and require a cash
deposit of estimated duties, at the applicable rate, for each
unliquidated entry of the merchandise at issue, entered or withdrawn
from warehouse for consumption on or after the date of initiation of
the inquiry.
We intend to notify the International Trade Commission in the event
of an affirmative preliminary determination of circumvention, in
accordance with 781(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f)(7)(i)(C).
The Department will, following consultation with interested parties,
establish a schedule for questionnaires and comments on the issues. The
Department intends to issue its final determination within 300 days of
the date of publication of this initiation notice.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 781(c) and (d)
of the Act and 19
CFR 351.225(i).
Dated: April 16, 2010.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-9488 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S