Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 21385-21386 [2010-9379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6977]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations:
‘‘Cleopatra: The Search for the Last
Queen of Egypt’’
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Cleopatra:
The Search for the Last Queen of Egypt,’’
imported from abroad for temporary
exhibition within the United States, are
of cultural significance. The objects are
imported pursuant to loan agreements
between the National Geographic
Society, Washington, DC, and the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at the Franklin
Institute, Philadelphia, PA, from on or
about June 5, 2010, until on or about
December 31, 2010; at Discovery Times
Square Exposition, New York, NY, from
on or about February 1, 2011, until on
or about August 31, 2011; at the Field
Museum, Chicago, IL, from on or about
October 15, 2011, until on or about
April 15, 2012; at the California Science
Center, Los Angeles, CA, from on or
about May 15, 2012, until on or about
December 1, 2012; at the Fort
Lauderdale Museum of Art, Fort
Lauderdale, FL, from on or about
January 1, 2013, until on or about May
31, 2013; and at possible additional
exhibitions or venues yet to be
determined, is in the national interest.
Public Notice of these Determinations is
ordered to be published in the Federal
Register.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional
and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[FR Doc. 2010–9470 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Carol B.
Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State
(telephone: 202–632–6473). The address
is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD,
Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522–
0505.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
21385
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Applications of Atlas Air, Inc. for
Certificate Authority
AGENCY:
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause
(Order 2010–X–X), Dockets DOT–OST–
2009–0267 and DOT–OST–2009–0268.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Transportation is directing all interested
persons to show cause why it should
not issue an order finding Atlas Air,
Inc., fit, willing, and able, and awarding
it a certificate of public convenience
and necessity to engage in foreign
charter air transportation of persons,
property, and mail.
DATES: Persons wishing to file
objections should do so no later than
April 25, 2010.
Objections and answers to
objections should be filed in Dockets
DOT–OST–2009–0267 and DOT–OST–
2009–0268 and addressed to U.S.
Department of Transportation Dockets,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, and should be
served upon the parties listed in
Attachment A to the order.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Scott Faulk, Air Carrier Fitness Division
(X–56, Room W86–487), U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–9721.
Dated: April 15, 2010.
Christa Fornaratto,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Aviation and
International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010–9297 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00166
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2010–0023]
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections. This document describes
one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to U.S. Department of Transportation
Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Docket No.
NHTSA–2010–0023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Laurie Flaherty, Program Analyst, Office
of Emergency Medical Services,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
NTI–140, Room W44–322,Telephone:
(202) 366–2705, or via e-mail at
laurie.flaherty@dot.gov.
Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
21386
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 2010 / Notices
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses. In
compliance with these requirements,
NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of
information:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Information, National
9–1–1 Program
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: N/A.
FORM Number: This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: NHTSA is proposing to
issue annual RFIs seeking comments
from all sources (public, private,
governmental, academic, professional,
public interest groups, and other
interested parties) on operational
priorities for the National Program.
The National 9–1–1 Program currently
provides:
Program and policy coordination
across Federal agencies. Support to
Public Safety Answering Points and
related State and local agencies for 9–1–
1 deployment and operations. NHTSA
intends to use the National 9–1–1
Program to work cooperatively with
public and private 9–1–1 stakeholders
to establish a vision for the future of 9–
1–1 services in the Nation. The RFIs
will solicit comments on the priorities
and strategies of the National 9–1–1
Program to accomplish its functions,
goals and vision. In addition, the RFIs
will obtain expressions of interest in
participating as partners and will
request responses to specific questions,
including critical 9–1–1 issues, benefits
to stakeholders, available data and
methods of collection, etc. These RFIs
will NOT seek comment on the 9–1–1
grant program administered by the
NHTSA. The RFIs will not include
requests for proposals or invitations for
bids.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: The 9–1–1 constituency is
a diverse group of entities, including:
Government Agencies:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Apr 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Local, State and Federal policy,
regulation, and funding agencies.
• Local and State emergency
communications agencies.
• Local, State and Federal emergency
response agencies.
Non-Governmental Organizations:
• Professional and industry
associations.
• Standards Development
Organizations.
• Citizen and special interest
advocacy organizations.
• Private emergency response and
recovery organizations.
• Research and academic
organizations.
IT/Telecommunications Service
Providers:
• ‘‘Traditional’’ telecommunication
service providers.
• ‘‘Public Safety/emergency’’ service
providers.
• ‘‘Other’’ IT/telecommunication
application service providers.
• IP-network access infrastructure/
service providers.
IT/Telecommunications Equipment
Providers:
• Equipment and support service
suppliers to ‘‘traditional’’
telecommunication companies.
• Equipment and support service
suppliers to IT network providers.
• ‘‘Public Safety/emergency services
network’’ equipment providers.
• Personal communication device
providers.
Third Party Emergency Call Centers:
• Third party service providers such
as telematics, poison control, medical
alert, central alarm monitoring, relay
services, and N9–1–1 services.
In order to collect information needed
to develop and implement effective
strategies for the National 9–1–1
Program to provide leadership,
coordination, guidance and direction to
the enhancement of the Nation’s 9–1–1
services, NHTSA must utilize efficient
and effective means of eliciting the
input and opinions of its constituency
groups. If approved, the proposed
annual RFIs would assist the National
9–1–1 Program in addressing the myriad
of issues posed by implementing new
technologies in 9–1–1 services in a
systematic, prioritized fashion, with
active involvement of its constituency
in this process. The results of the
proposed annual RFIs would be used to:
(1) Identify areas to target programs
and activities to achieve the greatest
benefit;
(2) Develop programs and initiatives
aimed at cooperative efforts to enhance
9–1–1 services nationwide; and
(3) to provide informational support
to States, regions, and localities in their
own efforts to enhance 9–1–1 services.
PO 00000
Frm 00167
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): Under this
proposed effort, the National 9–1–1
Program would issue annual RFIs,
seeking responses to specific questions
and soliciting comments on the
priorities and strategies used by the
National 9–1–1 Program to accomplish
its functions, goals and vision, and to
obtain expressions of interest in
participating as partners. The various
entities included in the constituency of
the National 9–1–1 Program would be
notified of the issuance of each RFI.
Likely respondents would include
companies, agencies and organizations
from all of the constituency groups
listed above, particularly local and State
emergency communications agencies,
professional and industry associations,
‘‘traditional’’ telecommunication service
providers, ‘‘public safety/emergency’’
service providers and special interest
advocacy organizations. The total
number of respondents is estimated at
30 to 40.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of
Information: NHTSA estimates that
responses to the questions included in
the proposed RFIs would require an
average of one hour to complete, for a
total of 40 to 50 hours. The respondents
would not incur any reporting costs
from the information collection. The
respondents also would not incur any
recordkeeping burden or recordkeeping
costs from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 47
U.S.C. 942.
Issued on April 19, 2010.
Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator for Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–9379 Filed 4–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Philadelphia International Airport,
Capacity Enhancement Program,
Environmental Impact Statement,
Announcement of a Preferred
Alternative
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) DOT.
ACTION: Announcement.
SUMMARY: The FAA has identified
Alternative A as the Preferred
Alternative for the Philadelphia
International Airport, Capacity
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21385-21386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0023]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This
document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to U.S. Department of
Transportation Dockets, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590. Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Flaherty, Program Analyst,
Office of Emergency Medical Services, National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, NTI-
140, Room W44-322,Telephone: (202) 366-2705, or via e-mail at
laurie.flaherty@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the
[[Page 21386]]
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA
asks public comment on the following proposed collection of
information:
Request for Information, National 9-1-1 Program
Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: N/A.
FORM Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information: NHTSA is proposing to
issue annual RFIs seeking comments from all sources (public, private,
governmental, academic, professional, public interest groups, and other
interested parties) on operational priorities for the National Program.
The National 9-1-1 Program currently provides:
Program and policy coordination across Federal agencies. Support to
Public Safety Answering Points and related State and local agencies for
9-1-1 deployment and operations. NHTSA intends to use the National 9-1-
1 Program to work cooperatively with public and private 9-1-1
stakeholders to establish a vision for the future of 9-1-1 services in
the Nation. The RFIs will solicit comments on the priorities and
strategies of the National 9-1-1 Program to accomplish its functions,
goals and vision. In addition, the RFIs will obtain expressions of
interest in participating as partners and will request responses to
specific questions, including critical 9-1-1 issues, benefits to
stakeholders, available data and methods of collection, etc. These RFIs
will NOT seek comment on the 9-1-1 grant program administered by the
NHTSA. The RFIs will not include requests for proposals or invitations
for bids.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: The 9-1-1 constituency is a diverse group of entities,
including:
Government Agencies:
Local, State and Federal policy, regulation, and funding
agencies.
Local and State emergency communications agencies.
Local, State and Federal emergency response agencies.
Non-Governmental Organizations:
Professional and industry associations.
Standards Development Organizations.
Citizen and special interest advocacy organizations.
Private emergency response and recovery organizations.
Research and academic organizations.
IT/Telecommunications Service Providers:
``Traditional'' telecommunication service providers.
``Public Safety/emergency'' service providers.
``Other'' IT/telecommunication application service
providers.
IP-network access infrastructure/service providers.
IT/Telecommunications Equipment Providers:
Equipment and support service suppliers to ``traditional''
telecommunication companies.
Equipment and support service suppliers to IT network
providers.
``Public Safety/emergency services network'' equipment
providers.
Personal communication device providers.
Third Party Emergency Call Centers:
Third party service providers such as telematics, poison
control, medical alert, central alarm monitoring, relay services, and
N9-1-1 services.
In order to collect information needed to develop and implement
effective strategies for the National 9-1-1 Program to provide
leadership, coordination, guidance and direction to the enhancement of
the Nation's 9-1-1 services, NHTSA must utilize efficient and effective
means of eliciting the input and opinions of its constituency groups.
If approved, the proposed annual RFIs would assist the National 9-1-1
Program in addressing the myriad of issues posed by implementing new
technologies in 9-1-1 services in a systematic, prioritized fashion,
with active involvement of its constituency in this process. The
results of the proposed annual RFIs would be used to:
(1) Identify areas to target programs and activities to achieve the
greatest benefit;
(2) Develop programs and initiatives aimed at cooperative efforts
to enhance 9-1-1 services nationwide; and
(3) to provide informational support to States, regions, and
localities in their own efforts to enhance 9-1-1 services.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
Under this proposed effort, the National 9-1-1 Program would issue
annual RFIs, seeking responses to specific questions and soliciting
comments on the priorities and strategies used by the National 9-1-1
Program to accomplish its functions, goals and vision, and to obtain
expressions of interest in participating as partners. The various
entities included in the constituency of the National 9-1-1 Program
would be notified of the issuance of each RFI. Likely respondents would
include companies, agencies and organizations from all of the
constituency groups listed above, particularly local and State
emergency communications agencies, professional and industry
associations, ``traditional'' telecommunication service providers,
``public safety/emergency'' service providers and special interest
advocacy organizations. The total number of respondents is estimated at
30 to 40.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information: NHTSA estimates that
responses to the questions included in the proposed RFIs would require
an average of one hour to complete, for a total of 40 to 50 hours. The
respondents would not incur any reporting costs from the information
collection. The respondents also would not incur any recordkeeping
burden or recordkeeping costs from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 47 U.S.C. 942.
Issued on April 19, 2010.
Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-9379 Filed 4-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P