Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation, 20861-20862 [2010-9205]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 21, 2010 / Notices
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
TPV Technology Limited, Suite 1023,
10th Floor, Ocean Centre, Harbour
City, 5 Canton Road, Tsim Sha Tsui,
Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Top Victory Electronics (Taiwan) Co.,
Ltd., 10F, No. 230, Liancheng Road,
Zhounghe City, Taipei County,
Taiwan.
TPV International (USA), Inc., 3737
Executive Center Drive, Suite 261,
Austin, Texas 78731.
Envision Peripherals, Inc., 47490
Seabridge Drive, Fremont, California
94538.
Top Victory Investments Ltd., Suite
1023, 10th Floor, Ocean Centre,
Harbour City, Tsim Sha Tsui,
Kowloon, Hong Kong.
TPV Electronics (Fujian) Co., Ltd., Yuan
Hong Road, Shang-zheng, Fuqing
City, Fujian Province, China.
TPV Display Technology (Wuhan) Co.,
Ltd., Unique No. 11 of Zhuankou
Development, District of Economic
Technological, Development Zone,
Wuhan City, China.
TPV Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., No.
10, Jiuxianqiao Road, Chaoyang
District, Beijing, China 100016.
Chimei Innolux Corporation, No. 160
Kesyue Road, Jhunan Science Park,
Miaoli County 350, Taiwan.
Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton
Drive, Suite 300, Austin, Texas 78758.
ViewSonic Corporation, 381 Brea
Canyon Road, Walnut, California
91789.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Mareesa A. Frederick, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC
20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a),
such responses will be considered by
the Commission if received not later
than 20 days after the date of service by
the Commission of the complaint and
the notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: April 16, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–9201 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–712]
Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and
Components Thereof; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 16, 2010, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Verizon
Communications Inc. of New York, New
York and Verizon Services Corp. of
Arlington, Virginia. An amended
complaint was filed on April 6, 2010.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain digital set-top
boxes and components thereof that
infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent
Nos. 5,666,293; 5,635,979; 6,381,748;
6,367,078; and 7,561,214. The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20861
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2580.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 14, 2010, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain digital set-top
boxes and components thereof that
infringe one or more of claim 38 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,666,293; claim 14 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,635,979; claim 13 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,381,748; claim 14 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,367,078; and claim 5 of
U.S. Patent No. 7,561,214 and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are—
Verizon Communications Inc., 140 West
Street, New York, NY 10007. Verizon
Services Corp. 1320 North Court
House Road, Arlington, VA 22201.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
20862
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 21, 2010 / Notices
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Cablevision Systems Corp., 1111
Stewart Avenue, Bethpage, NY 11714.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: April 16, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–9205 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1178
(Preliminary)]
ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject
investigation.
DATES:
Effective Date: April 16, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sherman (202–205–3289), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on
202–205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
On March
31, 2010, the Commission established a
schedule for the conduct of the subject
investigation (75 FR 17768, April 7,
2010). Subsequently, the Department of
Commerce extended the date for its
initiation of the investigation from April
20, 2010 to May 10, 2010. The
Commission, therefore, is revising its
schedule to conform with Commerce’s
new schedule.
The Commission’s new schedule for
the investigation is as follows: The
deadline for filing written briefs is May
4, 2010, the administrative deadline for
transmitting the determination to
Commerce is June 4, 2010, and the
Commission’s views are due to be
transmitted to Commerce on June 11,
2010. For further information
concerning the conduct of this
investigation and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A and B (19
CFR part 207).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: This investigation is being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.12 of the
Commission’s rules.
Issued: April 16, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
Glyphosate From China
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1059 (Review)]
Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof
From China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on hand trucks and certain parts
thereof from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on November 2, 2009 (74 FR
56661) and determined on February 5,
2010 that it would conduct an expedited
review (75 FR 8745, February 25, 2010).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on April 15,
2010. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4138
(April 2010), entitled Hand Trucks and
Certain Parts Thereof: Investigation No.
731–TA–1059 (Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 15, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–9207 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on April
15, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree
(the ‘‘Consent Decree’’) in United States
v. Wall Herald Corporation, Civil Action
No. 3:07–cv–04345 was lodged with the
United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey.
In this action, the United States
sought the recovery of response costs
pursuant to Section 107(a) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Recovery
Act, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C.
[FR Doc. 2010–9206 Filed 4–20–10; 8:45 am]
United States International
Trade Commission.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
AGENCY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Apr 20, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20861-20862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-9205]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-712]
Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes and Components Thereof; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on March 16, 2010, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Verizon Communications Inc. of New York, New York and Verizon Services
Corp. of Arlington, Virginia. An amended complaint was filed on April
6, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain digital set-top boxes and
components thereof that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
5,666,293; 5,635,979; 6,381,748; 6,367,078; and 7,561,214. The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and a cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2580.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on April 14, 2010, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital set-
top boxes and components thereof that infringe one or more of claim 38
of U.S. Patent No. 5,666,293; claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 5,635,979;
claim 13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,748; claim 14 of U.S. Patent No.
6,367,078; and claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,561,214 and whether an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are--
Verizon Communications Inc., 140 West Street, New York, NY 10007.
Verizon Services Corp. 1320 North Court House Road, Arlington, VA
22201.
[[Page 20862]]
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served:
Cablevision Systems Corp., 1111 Stewart Avenue, Bethpage, NY 11714.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J.
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: April 16, 2010.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-9205 Filed 4-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P